WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION PROJECT. Addendum to the Visual and Aesthetic Impacts Technical Report

Similar documents
WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION August 13, 2010 Page 4-25

There are no buildings on the site, which is entirely paved. Buildings east of the site consist of one- to three-story industrial-type buildings.

Archaeological Resources Supplemental Survey Technical Report

Final Land Use and Development Opportunities Report 5.0 Environmental Impact/Environmental Consequences

WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION. Visual and Aesthetics Impacts Technical Report

Table of Contents. Land Use and Development Opportunities Report Table of Contents

4.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES

VISUAL RESOURCES 1. INTRODUCTION 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS. a. Visual Character

TRANSIT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANS PROGRAM OVERVIEW

The impacts examined herein take into account two attributes of aesthetic values:

5.4.6 Cumulative Operational Impacts

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

appendix and street interface guidelines

Division of Land / Environmental Review. Volume I FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT WEST LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY PLAN AREA

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

IV. Environmental Impact Analysis B. Aesthetics. 1. Visual Quality/Views. a. Introduction

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. VIEWS

lot flankage Y street 16m 6m landscape strip for large site 3m landscape strip for small medium site

Urban Design Manual 2.0 DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITIES. Background. Urban Design Challenges

4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines

4.1 AESTHETICS INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. SHADE/SHADOW

FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist

Nob Hill Pipeline Improvements Project EIR

Visual and Aesthetic Resources

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A. AESTHETICS 1. INTRODUCTION

Visual and Aesthetics

PROJECT SITE The Proposed Project includes the Allen and Pike Street malls between Delancey and South Streets (see Figure 2C-1).

5.8 Visual Resources and Aesthetic Qualities

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

IV.B. VISUAL RESOURCES

Clairtrell Area Context Plan

Figure East End of 2 nd Street Tunnel

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

APPENDIX D: Visual and Aesthetic Conditions for NCCU Station Refinement. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

Carlsbad Village Redevelopment Concept Summary of Features

Ballston Station Multimodal Study. Stakeholder Meeting October 5, 2010

Urban Design Guidelines for Large-Format Retail

R STREET CORRIDOR NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Supplemental Guidelines Checklist

EXPO LINE COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS NOVEMBER 27 TH & DECEMBER 3 RD Los Angeles Department of City Planning

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

6.14 Visual Quality and Aesthetics

Meeting Display Boards for Public Hearing on the Wilson Transfer Station Project held Tuesday, February 18, 2014.

VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use

Tonight s Agenda. Summary Presentation Open House. Group Discussion Next Steps: online community wide survey

THEMES, VISION, + PRINCIPLES

Errata 1 Landmark Apartments Project Final Environmental Impact Report

5.2 LAND USE AND ZONING

VISION AND GUIDING DESIGN PRINCIPLES

The open space system should provide connective elements, relate to natural resources, and enhance the suburban character of the landscape..

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines

Stephanie Eyestone-Jones l President Matrix Environmental l 17 September 2013

FREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT

New-Cast Mixed-use Development Proposal King Street West, Newcastle, Ontario

4.1 Aesthetics Setting. a. Visual Character

3.1 AESTHETICS Background and Methodology

Gas Stations ottawa.ca

Chapter 2, Section C: Urban Design and Visual Resources A. INTRODUCTION

A. Background Summary of Existing Challenges and Potential Possibilities. 1. Summary of Existing Assets and Potential Opportunities

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Review of Opportunity Area C Draft Comprehensive Plan and Draft BOS Follow-On Motions. Special Working Group Meeting March 4, 2015

CHAPTER 15 AESTHETICS. Setting. Introduction. Impacts and Mitigation Measures of the 2015 Plan Alternatives

RIVERSIDE, Newton MA June 9, 2011

DRAFT. October Wheaton. Design Guidelines

Third Community Meeting Summary June 22, 2016 Focus: La Cienega Subway Station Area and Robertson and La Cienega Corridors

Fiscal Impact Statement: There is no General Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.

ELK GROVE TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES

BUILDING SCALE AND SETBACKS 5 ELEMENTS:... 5 FAÇADES (COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL) 5

Chapter PEDESTRIAN COMMERCIAL (PC) ZONING DISTRICT

4.1 AESTHETICS. A. Regulatory Framework

Welcome. Comprehensive Plan & Transportation Plan Open House November 7, 2012

Town Center. Block 5 Existing multifamily residential units are expected to remain.

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. AESTHETICS/VIEWS

Final Environmental Impact Statement/Final Environment Impact Report Appendix K Responses to Comments Received

RESEDA - WEST VAN NUYS COMMUNITY PLAN

B. PROPOSED REFINEMENTS POTENTIALLY AFFECTING URBAN DESIGN AND VISUAL RESOURCES

Urban Design Brief. 875 Wellington Road. Proposed One-Storey Fast Food Restaurant and Two-Storey Restaurant. Wellington Harlech Centre Inc.

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

4.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL QUALITY

Commercial Development Standards. City of Homestead

Seneca Meadows. Block 4 Locate office, technology, and medical development adjacent to I Screen views of garage structures from I-270.

NOVEMBER 2016 AARP IN ST. LOUIS & CITIZENS FOR MODERN TRANSIT PLACEMAKING STRATEGIES FOR ST. LOUIS TRANSIT DRAFT

THE 355/270 CORRIDOR:

TSAWWASSEN TOWN CENTRE REDEVELOPMENT BLOCK A 004

3.1 community vision. 3.3 required plan elements

Landscape and Streetscape Design 2.5

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Environmental Assessment. Appendix E Visual And Aesthetic Conditions Technical Report

Community Design Plan

Appendix D Community Impact Assessment

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

McDonald s Restaurant - Purcellville Town of Purcellville Special Use Permit Statement of Justification July 24, 2014

(c) DH-3 - Dixie Highway High Intensity Mixed-Use District (i) DH-3 - Dixie Highway High Intensity Mixed-Use District Use Table.

Appendix A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

The Lincoln Neighborhood Corridor Plan. The LiNC

SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Transcription:

PROJECT to the Visual and Aesthetic Impacts Technical Report August 2011

Visual and Aesthetic Impacts Technical Report SUMMARY On October 28, 2010, the Metro Board selected the Westwood/VA Hospital Extension (Alternative 2 in the Draft EIS/EIR) as the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) and authorized the preparation of the Westside Subway Extension Final EIS/EIR (the Final EIS/EIR) to analyze the LPA. This alternative would extend HRT, in subway, approximately nine-miles from the existing Metro Purple Line Wilshire/Western Station to a Westwood/VA Hospital Station. A detailed description of the LPA is provided in Chapter 2 of the Final EIS/EIR. This addendum supplements materials in the Westside Subway Extension Project Visual and Aesthetics Impacts Technical Report (the Report) dated August 2010 and supports the Final EIS/EIR. The LPA is referred to as Alternative 2 in this addendum and the Report. Modifications to the Report incorporated into this addendum reflect responses to comments on the Draft EIS/EIR and refinements to Alternative 2 as described in Chapter 2 of the Final EIS/EIR. 1.0 INTRODUCTION No Change. 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Change The Project description has been refined as part of the Final EIS/EIR. On October 28, 2010, the Metro Board selected the Westwood/VA Hospital Extension (Alternative 2 in the Draft EIS/EIR) as the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) and authorized the preparation of the Westside Subway Extension Final EIS/EIR (the Final EIS/EIR) to analyze the LPA. This alternative would extend HRT, in subway, approximately nine-miles from the existing Metro Purple Line Wilshire/Western Station to a Westwood/VA Hospital Station. The extension would include a total of seven new stations: Wilshire/La Brea Wilshire/Fairfax Wilshire/La Cienega Wilshire/Rodeo Century City (Century City Santa Monica or Century City Constellation) Westwood/UCLA (Westwood/UCLA On-Street or Westwood/UCLA Off-Street) Westwood/VA Hospital (Westwood/VA Hospital South or Westwood/VA Hospital North) The estimated one-way running time for the project would be approximately 15 minutes from the Wilshire/Western Station to the Westwood/VA Hospital Station. The extension would operate at headways of 4 minutes during peak periods and 10 Page 2 August 2011

Visual and Aesthetics Impacts Technical Report minutes during off-peak periods. As part of the project, Metro is also planning several enhancements to the Division 20 Maintenance and Storage Facility. The construction schedule for the Project is partially dependent on the timing of Federal funding availability. Two LPA construction scenarios are considered. Both scenarios will contain the same elements with differences only in the timing of when they are built and operational. The first construction scenario assumes that under the America Fast Forward (30/10) Scenario (Concurrent Construction), the LPA would open in its entirety to the Westwood/VA Hospital Station in 2022 with the three construction segments built concurrently (Wilshire/Western to Wilshire/La Cienega, Wilshire/La Cienega to Century City and Century City to Westwood/VA Hospital). The second construction scenario assumes that under the Metro Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Scenario (Phased Construction), the LPA would open in three consecutive phases (Phase 1 to Wilshire/La Cienega, Phase 2 to Century City, and Phase 3 to Westwood/VA Hospital), with the entire LPA operational to the Westwood/VA Hospital Station in 2036. A detailed description of the LPA is provided in Chapter 2 of the Final EIS/EIR. 3.0 APPLICABLE GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS No Change. 4.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONEMNT No Change. 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT/ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES Change The following is a modification of and replaces Section 5.2.3.2 Wilshire/La Brea Station The station entrance will be at the northwest corner of the Wilshire Boulevard and S. La Brea Avenue intersection on Metro-owned property or at the southwest corner as shown in Figure 5-2. Design of the entrance plaza area is expected to complement the Art Deco aesthetic of this commercial and residential neighborhood. The station will also include a one-story structure for the emergency generator along the east side of S. Detroit Street. The generator structure will fit within the visual context of the other station components and nearby three- to six-story buildings. The existing view of the Metro Service Center and Blockbuster Video building and a simulated view showing the building replaced by the station entrance and canopy are shown on Figure 5-3. The canopy would be a prominent visible structure on the corner of Wilshire Boulevard and S. La Brea Avenue but would blend with the varied scale of existing streetscape elements. Other aboveground station components that would be visible include signage; defining lighting; streetscape amenities such as benches, landscaping, and art. The belowground station components visible to viewers would include escalators, elevators, and stairs, as well as the station waiting and boarding areas. August 2011 Page 3

Visual and Aesthetic Impacts Technical Report The station would be within the section of Wilshire Boulevard that is designated scenic (the Miracle Mile); however, no adverse impacts to the scenic highway would occur. The canopy design is expected to complement the aesthetic of the area. Overall, the station entrance may contribute to improving visual quality along the Miracle Mile section of Wilshire Boulevard. Scenic vistas of the Santa Monica Mountains would not be adversely altered by any of the potential entrances. The existing Metro customer service center would be incorporated into the new station design. Several existing buildings will be removed to accommodate construction staging areas. However, removal of these buildings is not expected to adversely affect the areas visual character or quality. Figure 5-2. Wilshire/La Brea Station Page 4 August 2011

Visual and Aesthetics Impacts Technical Report Figure 5-3. Wilshire/La Brea Station Entrance, Replacing the Metro Service Center and Blockbuster Video (Existing View (top) and Visual Simulation (bottom)) August 2011 Page 5

Visual and Aesthetic Impacts Technical Report Change The following is a modification of and replaces Section 5.2.3.3 Wilshire/Fairfax Station The station entrance will be west of Johnie s Coffee Shop or at alternate entrance options at the northeast corner of Wilshire Boulevard and S. Fairfax Avenue or the southeast corner of Wilshire Boulevard and S. Orange Grove Avenue as shown in Figure 5-4. The aboveground station components are expected to complement the regional visual resources along Wilshire Boulevard, such as the LACMA West building and Petersen Automotive museum buildings, within the Miracle Mile Corridor. Figure 5-5 shows existing and simulated views of the potential entrance west of Johnie s Coffee Shop. This section of Wilshire Boulevard is also designated scenic (the Miracle Mile); however, no adverse impacts to the scenic highway would occur. The station entrance may contribute to improving visual quality along the Miracle Mile Corridor. Scenic vistas of the Santa Monica Mountains would not be adversely altered by any of the potential entrances. Several existing buildings will be removed to accommodate construction staging areas. However, removal of these buildings is not expected to adversely affect the areas visual character or quality. Figure 5-4. Wilshire/Fairfax Station Page 6 August 2011

Visual and Aesthetics Impacts Technical Report Figure 5-5. Wilshire/Fairfax Station Entrance West of Johnie s Coffee Shop (Existing (top) and Simulation (bottom)) Change The following is a modification of and replaces Section 5.2.3.4 Wilshire/La Cienega Station The Wilshire/ La Cienega Station entrance would require the removal of the existing Citi Bank building and a restaurant behind the Citi Bank. The entrance would be an open site that could eventually be part of a joint-development project (Figure 5-6). The station entrance will change the setting and visual character at the Wilshire Boulevard and S. La Cienega Boulevard intersection However, this change will not be significant and the station entrance may contribute to improving visual quality along this section of the Wilshire Boulevard corridor. The existing view of the Citi Bank site and a simulated view showing the potential plaza and entrance are provided in Figure 5-7. As August 2011 Page 7

Visual and Aesthetic Impacts Technical Report shown by the simulated view, the station entrance would be a prominent feature on the corner. Aboveground station components would include the station entrance structure, signage, defining lighting, benches, landscaping, special paving, art, and bike facilities. Scenic vistas along S. La Cienega Boulevard to the Santa Monica Mountains would not be adversely altered by the station. Several existing buildings will be removed to accommodate construction staging areas. However, removal of these buildings is not expected to adversely affect the areas visual character or quality. Figure 5-6. Wilshire/La Cienega Station Page 8 August 2011

Visual and Aesthetics Impacts Technical Report Figure 5-7. Wilshire/La Cienega Station (Existing View (top) and Visual Simulation (bottom)) Change The following is a modification of and replaces Section 5.2.3.5 Wilshire/Rodeo Station The station entrance will be located on the southwest corner of S. Beverly Drive and Wilshire Boulevard at the current site of the Ace Gallery or at alternate entrance at the Bank of America building at the northwest corner of Wilshire Boulevard and N. Beverly Drive or the Union Bank building on the south side of Wilshire Boulevard (Figure 5-8). Metro will select one of these options. The design of the station entrance is expected to complement the eclectic, Modern, Neo-Traditional, International, Art Deco, and less distinguishable buildings that contribute to the area s visual character. Aboveground station components would include the station entrance structure, signage, defining lighting, benches, landscaping, special paving, art, and bike facilities. The belowground station components visible to viewers would include escalators, elevators, and stairs, as well as the station waiting and boarding areas and impacts will be minimal. The existing view of the potential entrance at the south west corner of South Beverly Drive and Wilshire Boulevard and the simulated view are shown in Figure 5-9. Scenic vistas east and west down Wilshire Boulevard would not be adversely altered by any of the potential entrances, and no impacts to scenic highways would occur. Several existing buildings will be removed to accommodate construction staging areas. However, removal of these buildings is not expected to adversely affect the areas visual character or quality. August 2011 Page 9

Visual and Aesthetic Impacts Technical Report Figure 5-8. Wilshire/Rodeo Station Figure 5-9. Wilshire/Rodeo Station Station Entrance at the Southwest Corner of South Beverly Drive and Wilshire Boulevard (Existing View (top) and Visual Simulation (bottom)) Page 10 August 2011

Visual and Aesthetics Impacts Technical Report Change The following is a modification of and replaces Section 5.2.3.6 Century City Station There are two options for the Century City Station, one at Santa Monica Boulevard and the other at Constellation Boulevard. Metro will select one alignment and station location. The station option at Santa Monica Boulevard is shown on Figure 5-10. The Santa Monica Boulevard station entrance is at the southwest corner of Santa Monica Boulevard and Century Park East and would be incorporated into the sidewalk along Santa Monica Boulevard. Consistent with Metro s canopy design, the entrance would include a plaza with a canopy-covered entrance that would be highly visible and prominent in this area of mid- and high-rise buildings, including from the Los Angeles Country Club golf course on the north side of Santa Monica Boulevard. Other aboveground station components that would be visible include signage; defining lighting; streetscape amenities such as benches, landscaping, special paving, and art; and bike facilities such as racks or lockers. The belowground station components visible to viewers would include escalators, elevators, and stairs, as well as the station waiting and boarding areas. The designs for the aboveground station components are expected to complement the prominent buildings that contribute to the area s visual character. Figure 5-10. Century City Santa Monica Boulevard Station The potential entrances for the Constellation Option are shown on Figure 5-11. The Constellation Boulevard station entrance either would be incorporated into the landscaped area of the Hyatt Regency Hotel plaza or at the northeast corner of Constellation Boulevard and Avenue of the Stars. Visual impacts would be similar to the potential entrance for the Santa Monica Boulevard option, since each would include a plaza with a canopy-covered entrance that would be highly visible from the street and upper floors of surrounding buildings. However, the Constellation Option is located at a busy intersection that is surrounded by office towers, and the canopy in this setting would be less prominent than the canopy for the Santa Monica Boulevard Option. The design for the above-ground August 2011 Page 11

Visual and Aesthetic Impacts Technical Report station components at either location is expected to complement the prominent buildings that contribute to that area s visual character. Both of the Century City station options are located along scenic highways. However, no adverse visual impacts to the scenic attributes of either highway would occur. The station entrance components, including the canopy, may improve visual quality in Century City. Scenic vistas of the Santa Monica Mountains and the iconic Hollywood sign would not be adversely altered by any of the potential entrances. Several existing buildings will be removed to accommodate construction staging areas for either station location. However, removal of these buildings is not expected to adversely affect the areas visual character or quality. Figure 5-11. Century City Constellation Boulevard Station Change The following is a modification of and replaces Section 5.2.3.7 Westwood/UCLA Station There are two options for the Westwood/UCLA Station, one off-street and the other on-street. Page 12 August 2011

Visual and Aesthetics Impacts Technical Report Given the high ridership projections for Westwood/UCLA, two entrances are proposed for each station location. The Off-Street Option would be north of Wilshire Boulevard, between Veteran Avenue and Gayley Avenue (Figure 5-12). The entrance at Wilshire Boulevard and Gayley Avenue for the Off Street Station would be visual prominent. The aboveground station components that would be visible with all of these entrances include signage; defining lighting; streetscape amenities such as benches, landscaping, special paving, and art; and bike facilities such as racks or lockers. The belowground station components visible to viewers would include escalators, elevators, and stairs, as well as the station waiting and boarding areas. Figure 5-12. Westwood/UCLA Off-Street Station The entrance at the northwest corner of the Wilshire Boulevard and Westwood Boulevard intersection for the On-Street Station (Figure 5-13) would be retrofitted into the existing structure and therefore would not be as prominent as the other entrances being considered. Alternatively, the entrance option on the southwest corner of the Wilshire Boulevard and Westwood Boulevard intersection would be located in the plaza outside of high-rise office buildings. Designs of the aboveground station components for both options would complement the surrounding mid- to highrise residential towers, hotels, and office buildings. Views in the Westwood area are limited by highrise buildings. No scenic vistas would be adversely altered by either station option. In addition, none of the potential station entrances are located in Westwood Village, where they could contrast with the village character created by wide sidewalks, street-facing retail shops, and shade trees. Several existing buildings will be removed to accommodate construction staging areas for either station location. However, removal of these buildings is not expected to adversely affect the areas visual character or quality. August 2011 Page 13

Visual and Aesthetic Impacts Technical Report Figure 5-13. Westwood/UCLA On-Street Station Change The following is a modification of and replaces Section 5.2.4.1 Westwood/ VA Hospital There are two options for the Westwood/VA Hospital Station: one north of Wilshire Boulevard and the other south of Wilshire Boulevard. The entrance for the South Station would be in the parking lot at the southeast corner of Wilshire Boulevard and Bonsall Avenue (Figure 5-14). The South Station would also include a one-story structure for the emergency generator east of the entrance and a three-story parking structure on the site of an existing parking lot east of the VA Hospital. The generator structure would fit within the visual context of the other station components and would not alter any scenic vistas. The parking structure would block some territorial views to the east from the first- through third-story windows of the VA Hospital. Page 14 August 2011

Visual and Aesthetics Impacts Technical Report Figure 5-14. Westwood/VA Hospital South Station The entrance for the North Station would be along the north side of Wilshire Boulevard just west of Bonsall Avenue (Figure 5-15). The North Station would also include a one-story structure for the emergency generator east of the entrance, near the I-405 ramps. The generator structure would fit within the visual context of the other station components and would not alter any scenic vistas. The canopy at each entrance would be highly visible and prominent along Wilshire Boulevard. The other aboveground station components such as signage; defining lighting; streetscape amenities such as benches, landscaping, special paving, and art; and bike facilities such as racks or lockers would be integrated into the station design and would not be as visible. Most open-space areas surrounding the parking lot sites are well-landscaped with palms or other mature trees and lawn. Designs of the above-ground station components for both station options will complement the surroundings. None of the components for either option will conflict with the area s character, which includes large parking lots and other buildings on the VA property. Views in this area are limited by the I-405 overpass over Wilshire Boulevard. However, views to the north include the Santa Monica Mountains and Hollywood Hills. Views to the south include the taller buildings in Century City. No scenic vistas would be adversely altered by any of the potential entrances. August 2011 Page 15

Visual and Aesthetic Impacts Technical Report Figure 5-15. Westwood/VA Hospital North Station Change The following is a modification of and replaces Section 5.3 Construction Impacts Common to All Build Alternatives Construction impacts include temporary changes in views of and from the construction area. Construction activities, at station and staging areas and the selected maintenance and operations facility, may introduce considerable heavy equipment such as cranes and associated vehicles, including bulldozers, backhoes, graders, scrapers, and trucks, into the view corridor of public streets, sidewalks, and properties. Viewers in the construction area may experience inconveniences due to the presence of this equipment, as well as stockpiled construction-related materials. Mature vegetation, including trees, will be removed from some areas. Views of construction staging activities may be possible from residential land uses on some of the adjacent parcels, either directly through fencing, through entrance gates, or over fencing from second story and higher windows. If not screened from view, construction staging activities could temporarily affect adjacent viewers. Lighting of the construction staging areas at night could also affect viewers. The current estimate for the cut-and-cover station construction is 72 to 84 months. The primary visual impact to the local neighborhood will be associated with the time it takes to install piles and decking for the station box support system, visible for a three-to-four-month period. Construction of the station will continue while traffic travels on the decking so visual impacts during this period will be reduced. The Wilshire/Fairfax Station and the Wilshire/La Brea Station may require raised decking for station construction to minimize impacts to paleontological resources. The raised decking may temporarily increase the visual impacts to adjacent properties. No Change to Section 5.3.1 Page 16 August 2011

Visual and Aesthetics Impacts Technical Report 6.0 MITIGATION MEASURES Change The following is a modification of and replaces Section 6.1 Mitigation for Operational Impacts The Project will be designed consistent with Metro Design Criteria (Transit Design Criteria and Standards [Metro 2010]). Mitigation measures, as listed below, are proposed for the Build Alternatives to avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts related to conflicts between scale and visual character, building removal and right-of-way acquisition, removal of mature vegetation, location of ancillary facilities, and introduction of new sources of light and glare. To minimize visual clutter, system components should be integrated and the potential for conflicts reduced between the transit system and adjacent communities; design of the system stations and components will follow the recommendations and guidance developed in the urban design analysis conducted for the Project (Station Planning & Urban Design Concept Report, Metro 2009). These guidelines include the following: (1) preserve and enhance the unique cultural identity of each station area and its surrounding community by implementing art and landscaping; and (2) promote a sense of place, safety, and walkability by providing street trees, walkways or sidewalks, lighting, awnings, public art, and/or street furniture. Where mature trees are removed, replacement with landscape amenities of equal value will be incorporated into final designs, where feasible, to enhance visual integrity of the station area. Source shielding in exterior lighting at stations and maintenance facilities will be used to limit spillover light and glare. Station designs will be integrated with area redevelopment plans. The objective is to create a unified visual setting where the station components such as entrances complement redevelopment plans. Change The following is a modification of and replaces Section 6.2 Mitigation for Construction Impacts To reduce impacts related to construction activities, the following mitigation measures are recommended to be implemented: Visually obtrusive erosion-control devices, such as silt fences, plastic ground cover, and straw bales, should be removed as soon as the area is stabilized. Stockpile areas should be located in less visibly sensitive areas and, whenever possible, not be visible from the road or to residents and businesses. Limits on heights of excavated materials will be developed during design based on the specific area available for storage of material and visual impact. Lighting should be directed toward the interior of the construction staging area and be shielded so that it will not spill over into adjacent residential areas. In addition, temporary sound walls of August 2011 Page 17

Visual and Aesthetic Impacts Technical Report Metro approved design will be installed at station and work areas. These will block direct light and views of the construction areas from residences. Construction staging areas could be screened where possible, to reduce visual effects on adjacent viewers. 7.0 CEQA DETERMINATION No Change. Page 18 August 2011