AGGRESSIVENESS OF RHIZOCTONIA SOLANI AG 2-2 ON SUGARBEET AND ROTATION CROPS. Carol E. Windels and Jason R. Brantner

Similar documents
ROTATION CROP EFFECTS ON RHIZOCTONIA DISEASES OF SUGARBEET IN INFESTED FIELDS. Carol E. Windels and Jason R. Brantner

RHIZOCTONIA CROWN AND ROOT ROT ON SUGARBEET FOLLOWING CORN

APPLICATION METHOD AND RATE OF QUADRIS FOR CONTROL OF RHIZOCTONIA CROWN AND ROOT ROT. Jason R. Brantner and Carol E. Windels

EFFECT OF IN-FURROW FUNGICIDE APPLICATION METHOD ON CONTROL OF RHIZOCTONIA AND SUGARBEET STAND ESTABLISHMENT. Jason R. Brantner and Jeffrey D.

Update on Root Rot Research: Aphanomyces and Rhizoctonia

Control of Rhizoctonia from Planting to Harvest

BEAN ROOT ROT EVALUATION PROTOCOLS

Spring Barley Seed Treatment Trial, Hettinger County, North Dakota, 2005

Seed rots and Seedling diseases and what to look for in 2013?

THE POSSIBILITY OF CONTROLLING SCLEROTIUM ROLFSII ON SOYBEAN (GLYCINE MAX) USING TRICHODERMA AND TEBUCONAZOLE*) OKKY S.

Seed tuber-borne inoculum of Rhizoctonia significantly contributes to Rhizoctonia disease epidemics on potato and pathogen population genetic changes

PHYTOPHTHORA ROOT AND RUNNER ROT OF CRANBERRY IN WISCONSIN- THE CURRENT SITUATION

Clubroot of Canola: Overview of an Emerging Problem

COMPARISON OF VARIOUS METHODS FOR THE ISOLATION OF PHYTOPHTHORA CINNAMONI FROM AVOCADO SOILS

CERCOSPORA BETICOLA INSENSITIVITY IN MICHIGAN AND MICHIGAN SUGAR COMPANY S RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES

EFFECTS OF AMMONIUM LIGNOSULFONATE ON SOIL MICROBIAL POPULATIONS, VERTICILLIUM WILT, AND POTATO SCAB.

Strategies to Reduce Damage from Aphanomyces Root Rot on Alfalfa

Raspberry Root Rot Sampling Guidelines for Phytophthora fragariae rubi Identification using PCR

Managing Seedling Disease Problems on Rice Through Fungicides, Adapted Cultivars, and Cropping Systems

Seed & Soil-borne Diseases - What s New? 2012 Agronomy Update Crop Establishment

Tomato Bacterial canker- Clavibacter michiganensis pv. michiganensis

Southern Blight Cliff Notes- 2017

Bacterial Vascular Necrosis and Rot of Sugarbeet: Genetic Vulnerability and Selecting for Resistance E. D. Whitney and R. T.

STRAWBREAKER FOOT ROT OR EYESPOT OF WHEAT

Minnesota State Florists Bulletin

Fusarium wilt of lettuce. Michael E. Matheron Extension Plant Pathologist Yuma Agricultural Center

2. Prepare a suspension of 500 ppm dichloran. The method has only been validated using Botran 5F, but other formulations may be effective.

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FINAL REPORT FUNDING CYCLE

Root Rot in Pulses. Faye Dokken-Bouchard, Provincial Specialist, Plant Disease 2/19/2015 1

VENTURA COUNTY AVOCADO ROOT ROT RESISTANCE PLOT

TRENDS. Acanopy is often thought of as the leafy. Turf Grass. The turfgrass canopy and its environment

The aim of this pamphlet is to provide more information about the disease Late Root Rot and precautions to reduce the damage.

LEVELS OF SEED AND SOIL BORNE

Biological Control of Pythium Root Rot in Container Flower Production Using Microbial Inoculants

Population Increase of Pratylenchus hexincisus on Corn as Related to Soil Temperature and Type 1

Common Diseases of North Central US Hops & Diagnostic Support Updates

Further Evaluation of Biological Control Agents for Verticillium Wilt in Peppermint. Sai Sree Uppala, Bo Ming Wu, Mark Hagman and Jim Cloud

Laura E. Kaderabek, Emma C. Lookabaugh, W. Garrett Owen, Lesley A. Judd, Brian E. Jackson, H. David Shew, and D. Michael Benson

Overview of Findings at the Santa Cruz Nursery Research Site. Steve Tjosvold University of California Cooperative Extension

Soilborne Root and Stem Diseases of Dry Beans in Nebraska

CHAPTER 4 EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE AND SOIL MOISTURE CONTENT ON CUTTING ESTABLISHMENT

STALK ROTS. When to look for: Mid-August to Early October

Bioassay for comparing levels of pythium graminicola in soils

Field and Storage Diseases of Sweet Potatoes

The Root Rot of Black Walnut Seedlings Caused by

Rice Sheath Blight Disease Management

Management of blackleg caused by Dickeya. Amy Charkowski Professor BioAgricultural Sciences and Pest Management

Effect of a Garlic Extract on Growth of Select Soil-borne Fungal Organisms in Culture

Fungicidal Seed Treatment for Pulse Crops.

Characterization and Survival of Rhizoctonia solani AG2-2 LP Associated with Large Patch Disease of Zoysia Grass

Appendix 2. Methodology for production of Pochonia chlamydosporia and Pasteuria penetrans (Dudutech K Ltd.)

Cereal Seed Health and Seed Treatment Strategies: Exploiting new seed testing technology to optimise seed health decisions for wheat.

Isolation of novel plant-beneficial soil bacteria to enhance legume crop productivity

Anthracnose of Strawberry. Production Guideline. In This Issue

Vegetable Transplant Health John Damicone, Extension Plant Pathologist

Effect of Soil Amendment with Dry and Wet Distillers Grains on Growth of Canola and Soil Properties

Black Rot of Crucifers

Realities of Disease Management in Wheat. Paul Esker Extension Plant Pathologist UW Madison

Quick Facts. Gary D. Franc, Extension Plant Pathologist University of Wyoming Department of Plant Sciences

Establishing a Source of Disease Free, True-to- Type Muscadine Vines

Pests of Ornamentals and Turfgrass

Comparison of Field Seeding of Sugar Beets and Mangel Wurzels with Two Methods of Transplanting 1

Important Lettuce Diseases and Their Management

Declared out of print June Some facts and recommendations in this publication are no longer endorsed by WSU Extension.

Temperature and Dose influence Phoma macrostoma efficacy on seedling broadleaf weeds.

Grafting of Tomatoes for Soil-based Production in Greenhouse and High Tunnels Judson Reid, Kathryn Klotzbach and Nelson Hoover

BIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF STAND-DECLINE DISEASES OF IRRIGATED ALFALFA IN THE WESTERN U.S. Fred A. Gray, Charla R. Hollingsworth and David W.

Starting Your Garden Indoors. Coppell Environmental Education December 8, 2012

Management of Field Pea Diseases

Phytophthora Root Rot

Impact of Major Cotton Diseases on Yield and Their Management in Turkey. Ms. Sergül ÇOPUL Cotton Research Station Msc. Agricultural Engineer

Bioassay Phytophthora sojae-soybean

Seed Quality and Guidelines for Seed Borne Diseases of Pulse Crops

MANAGEMENT OF INSECT-VECTORED PATHOGENS OF PLANTS

MAJOR DISEASES OF LETTUCE GROWN BY COMMERCIAL NUTRIENT FILM TECHNIQUE IN THAILAND

Redbanded Stink Bug Research

Kern County Vegetable Crops

Managing Race 4 FOV (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vas infectum) in California Cotton. Cotton field infected with Race 4 Fusarium

Bacterial Wilt and Bacterial Leaf Scorch on Blueberry in Florida. Deanna Bayo Ph.D. Student Phil Harmon, Ph.D. UF/IFAS Plant Pathology Department

What in the soil is going on with prairie field pea production?

CRP Conversion: Missouri

Welcome to the Iowa Certified Nursery Professional Training program Module 9: Managing Plant Diseases and Insects.

Rhizomania on Sugar Beet Importance, identification, control

SILVER SCURF AND BLACK DOT. Compiled and published by Potatoes South Africa (Department: Research and Development) June 2015

Plant Breeding and Propagation

Wilt diseases of tomatoes can be caused

ORNAMENTALS NORTHWEST ARCHIVES

Steven R. James and Gary L. Reed

Disclaimer. Use of pesticides. Further information

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF CITRUS ROOT ROT IN CAMBODIA

FIELD TRIALS FOR RESISTANCE TO PHYTOPHTHORA ROOT ROT

Plant Tissue Testing as a Guide to Side-Dressing Sugar Beets 1

Bacterial Soft Rot: New Name. New Pathogen? New Problem?

MEASURE AND MANAGE. Plant Sampling and Testing Information

Method for the Detection of Septoria apiicola on Celery and Celeriac Seed. Celery (Apium graveolens) and Celeriac (Apium graveolens var.

Diseases in Alfalfa Seed Production. Faye Dokken-Bouchard Provincial Specialist, Plant Disease Crops Branch, Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture

USING EARTHWORMS TO IMPROVE SOIL HEALTH AND SUPPRESS DISEASES

Short report: An in vitro method to rescue embryos of horseradish (Armoracia

Finding the Balance: Calcined Clay Rate Effects in Pine Bark Substrates

PROPAGATION AND RETESTING OF WALNUT ROOTSTOCK GENOTYPES PUTATIVELY RESISTANT TO PESTS AND DISEASES

Transcription:

AGGRESSIVENESS OF RHIZOCTONIA SOLANI AG 2-2 ON SUGARBEET AND ROTATION CROPS Carol E. Windels and Jason R. Brantner Professor and Research Fellow, respectively University of Minnesota, Northwest Research and Outreach Center, Crookston Rhizoctonia crown and root rot (RCRR) of sugarbeet, caused by the soilborne fungus Rhizoctonia solani, is increasing in prevalence in the United States, Europe, and other countries (1,2). The fungus is composed of 13 genetically isolated populations called anastomosis groups or AGs (8). The primary population attacking sugarbeet is R. solani AG 2-2, which is further divided into the intraspecific groups (ISGs) AG 2-2 IV and AG 2-2 IIIB. Both ISGs occur in Minnesota and North Dakota (1) and produce identical symptoms of RRCR on sugarbeet. The ISGs of AG 2-2 are identified by growth on culture media at 95 0 F; AG 2-2 IIIB grows at this temperature but AG 2-2 IV does not (8). According to the literature, AG 2-2 IIIB is more aggressive and has a wider host range (e.g., bean crops, corn) than AG 2-2 IV (3-6, 8). The Sugarbeet Plant Pathology Laboratory at the University of Minnesota, Northwest Research and Outreach Center (NWROC), Crookston, has collected nearly 1,000 cultures of R. solani AG 2-2 from sugarbeet with RCRR throughout the Red River Valley (RRV) and southern Minnesota. The collection has been identified to ISG by differential grown at 95 0 F. In 2009, collaborations were initiated with plant pathologists Dr. Frank Martin (USDA- ARS, Salinas, CA) and Dr. Linda Hanson (USDA-ARS, Michigan State University, East Lansing) to develop molecular markers to analyze genetic population structure of the collection. A subset of 48 cultures was selected to represent maximum diversity and preliminary evidence indicates considerable genetic variability within each ISG. This likely occurs because R. solani has multiple nuclei in each cell. Population structure of the cultures (based on molecular markers), will be correlated with their aggressiveness/pathogenicity on sugarbeet and rotation crops. OBJECTIVES Experiments were conducted to evaluate 48 cultures of R. solani AG 2-2 collected in Minnesota and North Dakota (24 cultures each of AG 2-2 IV and AG 2-2 IIIB) for: 1.) temperature range of growth and 2.) aggressiveness/pathogenicity on seedling and adult plants of sugarbeet and several rotation crops. MATERIALS AND METHODS A subset of 48 cultures of R. solani from sugarbeet with RCRR were confirmed as AG 2-2 by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and identified to ISG by growth on agar media at 95 F; 24 cultures were AG 2-2 IV and 24 were AG 2-2 IIIB. Within each ISG, cultures originated in different geographic areas, from near the Canadian border to the Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative (~280 miles, Fig. 1). Fields had been sown to various crops the previous season (corn, sweet corn, edible bean, potato, soybean, spring wheat). Cultures were isolated from sugarbeet varieties differing in susceptibility to RCRR and from different parts of the root (crown or tap root). Temperature range and optimal temperature for growth. Five-millimeter diameter disks were removed from margins of R. solani AG 2-2 cultures actively growing on potato dextrose agar (PDA) and transferred to 9-cm diameter petri dishes containing 20 ml PDA. Plates were transferred to controlled environment chambers set at 46, 50, 54, 57, 61, 64, 68, 73, 77, 79, 84, 86, 90, 91.4, 93.2, 95, and 96.8 F (= 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, and 36 C, respectively). After 24 hr, lines were drawn at the margin of growth. Plates were incubated for another 48 hr and growth was measured from the 24-hr line to the margin of culture growth. There were four plates prepared per culture per temperature. Pathogenicity tests. Each culture of R. solani was tested for pathogenicity on seedlings and roots of adult plants of sugarbeet, soybean, pinto bean and wheat. Evaluations also were done on corn seedlings but have not yet been done on adult corn roots. Inoculum of R. solani AG 2-2 for tests on seedlings of all crops and adult sugarbeets was prepared by growing each culture on sterilized barley grain for 3 weeks. Then, the grain was dried and ground in a Wiley mill with a 3-mm round screen. Inoculum for adult rotation crops was grown on sterilized whole corn kernels

N. Dakota O O O O O O O O OO O O OO O O O Minnesota IV = IIIB = o Fig. 1. Source of 24 cultures of Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-2 IV (noted by ) and 24 cultures of AG 2-2 IIIB (noted by o ). ================================== for 3 weeks. Pathogenicity tests were arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replicates. Experiments included a non-inoculated control and were repeated. Sugarbeet seedlings. Seed of Beta 87RR38 treated with fungicides (standard rates of Apron Thiram 20 g Tachigaren/unit) was sown in 4.5-inch 3 plastic pots (25 seeds/pot) filled with a commercial soil (Berger BM2, fertilized with 2g/Liter Osmocote 14-14-14 slow release fertilizer) mixed with ground barley inoculum of R. solani (15 mg/pot). Soil was watered to keep moist and pots were incubated 4 wk in a controlled environment chamber at 75 F with a 14-hr photoperiod. Seedling stands were counted three times per week and dying seedlings were removed and assayed in the laboratory to verify infection by R. solani. After 4 wk, remaining seedlings were removed from soil, washed, and rated on a 0 to 3 scale where 0 = no disease and 3 = root completely rotted and plant dead. These ratings, along with the number of dying seedlings, were used to calculate a root rot index (0 to 100 scale; 0 = no disease, 100 = all plants dead at 4 weeks after planting). Rotation crop seedlings. Seed of LaPaz pinto bean, NK05RM304030 soybean, Fuller wheat, and Pioneer 139D81 corn (not treated with fungicide) were sown in 4.5-inch 3 plastic pots (10 seeds/pot) filled with a commercial soil (Berger BM2, fertilized with 2g/Liter Osmocote 14-14-14 slow release fertilizer) and mixed with ground inoculum of R. solani at a rate of 1:500 by volume (modified from Sumner and Bell [10]). Soil was watered to keep moist and pots were incubated in a controlled environment chamber at 75 F with a 14-hr photoperiod. After 12 days, plants were removed from soil, washed, and rated. Pinto bean and soybean were rated on a 1 to 5 scale where 1 = no symptoms and 5 = shoot dead with 75-100% of stem girdled (7). Corn was rated on a 1 to 5 scale where 1 = < 2% root surface rotted and 5 = plant dead (10). Wheat subcrown internodes were rated on a 0 to 3 scale where 0 = healthy and 3 = more than 50% of surface with lesions and discoloration (11). Sugarbeet adult plants. Seed of the variety used in the seedling trial also was sown in 6-inch diameter plastic pots (three seeds/pot) filled with commercial soil mix (Berger BM2). Pots were watered as needed and incubated in the greenhouse from 70 to 80 F with a 14-hr photoperiod. After 3 wk, plants were thinned to one per pot and fertilized with Osmocote 14-14-14 slow release fertilizer (6 g/pot). At 8 wk after planting, soil was scraped from the root surface to a 1-inch depth, one-half teaspoon of ground barley inoculum of R. solani was placed on the root surface and then recovered with soil. An additional 250 cc of soil was added around the sugarbeet crown. Pots were watered and placed in a controlled environment chamber at 75 F with a 14-hr photoperiod. After 12 days, roots were removed from soil, washed, and rated on a 0 to 7 scale (0= no disease, 7 = root completely rotted and plant dead). Rotation crop adult plants. Soybean and pinto bean seed of the varieties used in the seedling trials also were sown in 6-inch diameter plastic plots (four seeds/pot) filled with commercial soil mix (Berger BM2). Pots were watered

Radial growth (mm) as needed and incubated in the greenhouse from 70 to 80 F with a 14-hr photoperiod. Wheat seed of the same variety as in the seedling trial was sown in 4 x 4 x 5-inch pots (four seeds per pot) and placed in a controlled environment chamber at 75 F with a 14-hr photoperiod. After 3 wk, plants were thinned to two per pot and fertilized with Osmocote 14-14-14 slow release fertilizer (6 g/pot). At 8 wk after planting soybean and pinto bean (5 wk after planting in the repeated trial), soil was scraped from the root surface to a 1-inch depth, one R. solaniinfested corn kernel was placed along the root surface, and soil was pushed back to cover the root. Pots were returned to the greenhouse and watered regularly to maintain high soil moisture. Wheat plants were inoculated at 6 wk after planting by the same method and returned to a controlled environment chamber. After 12 days, roots were removed from soil and washed. Soybean, pinto bean, and wheat were rated for disease as previously described. For all trials, subcrown internodes of wheat and basal stems/roots from pinto beans and soybean (from at least one replicate) were assayed in the laboratory to verify infection with R. solani. Pieces were excised from the margin of diseased and healthy tissue, surface-treated in 0.5% bleach, rinsed twice in sterile deionized water, and placed on modified tannic acid medium. Plates were examined for growth of R. solani AG 2-2 from 7 to 14 days later. Statistical analysis. Radial growth of cultures was plotted against temperature and a best-fit line was determined. For each crop (seedling and adult tests), pathogenicity data were combined for repeated experiments and subjected to analysis of variance to determine if AG 2-2 IV cultures differed from AG 2-2 IIIB (P = 0.05). In addition, correlation coefficients were calculated for pathogenicity relationships between plant age and crops. RESULTS Temperature range and optimal temperature for growth. Growth of R. solani AG 2-2 IV and AG 2-2 IIIB was negligible at 46 F, the minimum temperature tested (Fig. 2). Both ISGs grew an equal rate until about 64 F, when AG 2-2 IV began to slow down and growth of AG 2-2 IIIB continued to increase in a linear matter. Between 90 and 95 F, R. solani AG 2-2 IV stopped growing, while AG 2-2 IIIB continued to grow, but at a lower rate. At 96.8 ºF, AG 2-2 IIIB stopped growing. 40 35 30 y = 0.7766x - 34.575 R² = 0.9515 25 20 15 IIIB IV 10 5 0 y = -0.0092x 2 1.7742x - 60.549 R² = 0.9304 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 Temp ( F) Fig. 2. Growth of Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-2 IV and AG 2-2 IIIB from 46 to 95 0 F on potato dextrose agar. Each data point is an average of 24 cultures replicated four times.

Pathogenicity tests. Sugarbeet seedlings. Cultures of R. solani AG 2-2 IIIB were significantly more aggressive than AG 2-2 IV in causing disease by 4 weeks after planting (Table 1). Root rot ratings (0 to 100 scale) for AG 2-2 IIIB averaged 78 and for AG 2-2 IV averaged 51. There was considerable variability in aggressiveness within each ISG; cultures of AG 2-2 IV ranged in root rot ratings from 5 to 100 and AG 2-2 IIIB ranged from 42 to 100. The non-inoculated control was disease-free and averaged a rating of 0.8. Cultures of R. solani were isolated from 85% of sugarbeet seedlings in Rhizoctonia-infested soil and were not isolated in the control. Rotation crop seedlings. On both pinto bean and soybean, R. solani AG 2-2 IIIB was significantly more aggressive in causing basal stem rot and root rot than AG 2-2 IV (Table 1). Disease ratings for pinto bean and soybean averaged 4.4 and 4.1 for AG 2-2 IIIB, respectively, and 2.7 and 3.2 for AG 2-2 IV, respectively. On both bean crops, individual cultures of R. solani AG 2-2 IV and AG 2-2 IIIB ranged from low to high aggressiveness in causing disease. Cultures of R. solani were isolated from 88% of pinto beans and 54% of soybean basal stems in inoculated soil; the fungus was not isolated in non-inoculated controls. On wheat seedlings, the ISGs caused virtually no root rot, as noted by the very low disease ratings (Table 1). Statistically, R. solani AG 2-2 IIIB caused more disease than AG 2-2 IV, but severity levels were so low, they were of no biological significance. Cultures of R. solani, however, were re-isolated from 96% of subcrown internodes in inoculated soil and were not isolated in the non-inoculated control. On corn, R. solani AG 2-2 IIIB caused significantly more root rot on seedlings than AG 2-2 IV (Table 1). The average disease rating for AG 2-2 IIIB on corn was 3.1 and individual cultures caused a range of disease ratings from 1.8 to 4.1. The average disease rating for AG 2-2 IV was 2.1 and individual cultures resulted in a range of disease ratings from 1.2 to 3. Cultures of R. solani were isolated from 100% of plants in infested soil and were not isolated in the non-inoculated control. Sugarbeet adult plants. Both ISGs were equally aggressive in causing RCRR on adult plants at 12 days after inoculation (P = 0.1002, Table 1). Ratings for RCRR (0 to 7 scale) for AG 2-2 IV averaged 5.0 (ranged from 3.3 to 5.6) and for AG 2-2 IIIB averaged 4.9 (ranged from 3.8 to 5.9) (Table 1). The non-inoculated control was diseasefree and averaged a rating of 0.3. Cultures of R. solani were isolated from 96% of roots in inoculated soil and were not isolated in the non-inoculated control. Rotation crop adult plants. On soybean, R. solani AG 2-2 IV and AG 2-2 IIIB were equally aggressive in causing stem and root rot and averaged the same disease rating of 3.5 (Table 1). Individual cultures within AG 2-2 IIIB varied in pathogenicity and values ranged from 2.3 to 4.1, which was similar to the range of variability within AG 2-2 IV (3 to 4.3). Cultures of R. solani were isolated from 56% of basal stems in inoculated soil and were not isolated in the non-inoculated control. Both ISGs were somewhat less aggressive on pinto bean than on soybean (Table 1). On pinto bean, the AG 2-2 IIIB population was statistically more aggressive in causing stem and root rot than AG 2-2 IV, but average values were nearly identical for both ISG s. The average disease rating for AG 2-2 IIIB was 3.1 (range from 2.3 to 3.8) and for AG 2-2 IV was 2.9 (range was from 2.5 to 3.4). Cultures of R. solani were isolated from 50% of basal stems in inoculated soil and were not isolated in the non-inoculated control. On wheat, disease was of no consequence for AG 2-2 IV and AG 2-2 IIIB. The average root rot value for AG 2-2 IIIB was very low (= 0.3), but was significantly higher than the average value for AG 2-2 IV (= 0.1). In this case, statistical significance was inconsequential. Cultures of R. solani were isolated from 80% of subcrown internodes in inoculated soil and were not isolated in the non-inoculated control. Relationships: Aggressiveness on seedlings and adult plants of all crops. Wheat was excluded from this analysis because R. solani AG 2-2 was non-pathogenic. Aggressiveness of cultures of R. solani AG 2-2 was positively correlated for all seedling crop combinations (P < 0.001, Table 2). Cultures of R. solani AG 2-2 that were most aggressive in causing crown and root rot on adult sugarbeet plants were negatively correlated with those causing basal stem and root rot on adult soybean and edible bean, however, cultures aggressive on soybean also were aggressive on pinto bean (Table 2). Overall, there was no correlation between aggressiveness of cultures of R. solani AG 2-2 on adult sugarbeet and aggressiveness on seedlings of sugarbeet, soybean, pinto bean or corn (Table 2). In general, there was a positive correlation for aggressiveness of cultures of R. solani AG 2-2 on adult soybean and pinto bean with seedlings of sugarbeet, soybean, pinto bean, and corn (Table 2).

Table 1. Pathogenicity of 24 cultures of Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-2 IV and 24 cultures of AG 2-2 IIIB on seedlings and adult plants of sugarbeet and several rotation crops. Each value is averaged across two trials of the 24 cultures (range = minimum to maximum disease ratings for individual cultures). Average disease ratings (range: minimum-maximum) Crop Seedlings u Adult plants v (Disease scale) Control AG 2-2 IV AG 2-2 IIIB Control AG 2-2 IV AG 2-2 IIIB Sugarbeet (0-100 scale) w 0.8 51 a 78 b 0.3 5.0 a 4.9 a adults (0-7 scale) (5-100) (42-100) (3.3-5.6) (3.8-5.9) Pinto bean (1-5 scale) x 1.0 2.7 a 4.4 b 1.0 2.9 a 3.1 b (1.8-4.5) 3.5-5.0) (2.5-3.4) (2.3-3.8) Soybean (1-5 scale) x 1.0 3.2 a 4.1 b 1.0 3.5 a 3.5 a (1.9-4.6) (2.7-5.0) (3.0-4.3) (2.3-4.1) Wheat (0-3 scale) y 0.0 0.7 a 1.0 b 0.0 0.1 a 0.3 b (0.4-1.1) (0.5-1.6) (0.0-0.7) (0.1-0.7) Corn (1-5 scale) z 1.0 2.1 a 3.1 b - - - (1.2-3.0) (1.8-4.1) u v w x y z For seedlings of each crop, values followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P=0.05). For adult roots of each crop, values followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P=0.05). Sugarbeet seedling root rot index = 0 to 100 scale, 0 = no disease, 100 = all plants dead at 4 weeks after planting; adult root rot index 0 to 7 scale, 0 = no disease, 7 = root completely rotted and plant dead. Pinto bean and soybean (seedlings and adult plants) rated on a 1 to 5 scale, 1 = no symptoms, 5 = shoot dead with 75-100% of stem girdled. Wheat (seedling and adult plants) subcrown internodes rated on a 0 to 3 scale, 0 = healthy and 3 = more than 50% of surface with lesions and discoloration. Corn seedlings rated on a 1 to 5 scale, 1 = <2% root surface rotted and 5 = plant dead. ================================== Table 1. Correlation coefficients of 48 cultures of Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-2 (24 of AG 2-2 IV and 24 of AG 2-2 IIIB) for seedling pathogenicity among various crops, adult plant pathogenicity among various crops, and relationship among pathogenicity of seedlings and adult plants of various crops. Disease severity Seedlings Adult roots Variable Sugarbeet Soybean Pinto bean Corn Sugarbeet Soybean Pinto bean Seedlings Sugarbeet 1.000 0.484*** 0.581*** 0.599*** -0.266 0.317* 0.364* Soybean 1.000 0.711*** 0.714*** -0.041 0.324* 0.277 Pinto bean 1.000 0.825*** -0.311* 0.388** 0.512*** Corn 1.000-0.158 0.327* 0.360* Adult plants Sugarbeet 1.000-0.381** -0.348* Soybean 1.000 0.717*** Pinto bean 1.000 Y Pathogenicity tests for each crop averaged across two trials (four replicates per culture per trial). Z P < 0.05 = *, P < 0.01 = **, P < 0.001 = ***; unmarked correlation coefficients are not significant.

DISCUSSION Both ISGs grew at a similar rate until about 65 to 70 0 F, when AG 2-2 IV grew slower and AG 2-2 IIIB continued to grow in a linear pattern until 90 0 F. Between 90 and 95 0 F, growth of AG 2-2 IV stopped and AG 2-2 IIIB declined. This is not unexpected since the two populations were separated by their ability to grow at 95 0 F (8). It is possible that the ability of AG 2-2 IIIB to grow more vigorously than AG 2-2 IV, especially at high temperatures, allows it to be more aggressive in causing disease. In our trials, R. solani AG 2-2 IIIB was more aggressive in causing disease on seedlings of sugarbeet and other crops than AG 2-2 IV but on average, both populations were equally aggressive on adult roots of other crops (Table 1). Temperatures during seedling pathogenicity trials were at 75 0 F in growth chambers and during adult plant trials were 70 to 80 0 F in the greenhouse. These temperatures would be reasonably favorable for both population of R. solani AG 2-2 to cause disease. Perhaps seedlings of all crops were more prone to infection because of immature root tissues. The data reported here are the first to document uniform aggressiveness of cultures of R. solani AG 2-2 IV and 2-2 IIIB in causing severe RCRR on adult sugarbeet roots. This is in contrast to Panella (6), who determined R. solani AG 2-2 IIIB was more aggressive than AG 2-2 IV in causing RCRR on sugarbeet. We isolated all cultures from sugarbeet roots/crowns with RCRR and both ISGs produced identical symptoms. In 1987, Ogoshi (5) reported AG 2-2 IV caused RCRR of sugarbeet while AG 2-2 IIIB caused root diseases on a wide range of other crops including beans. Occurrence of both AG 2-2 IV and AG 2-2 IIIB on sugarbeet in the United States (1,6,9) and AG 2-2 IIIB in Europe (2,4) indicates that AG 2-2 IIIB is becoming a predominate pathogen of sugarbeet. This trend may reflect more intensive surveying and understanding of RCRR in the last two decades, but also suggests possible shifts in ISGs associated with long-term cultivation of sugarbeet and susceptible rotation crops. Both ISGs are pathogenic on adult sugarbeet roots, so this may account for increases in prevalence of RCRR worldwide. Individual cultures of R. solani AG 2-2 varied in aggressiveness in causing disease on sugarbeet and other crops (seedlings and adult roots), except spring wheat, which was a non-host and minimally affected by the pathogen. Cultures of R. solani were isolated from superficial, external tissues of wheat (epidermis) at nearly 100%. This delicate tissue decomposes quickly in soil, and as tissue decomposes, R. solani dies. Based on our trials, spring wheat is a non-host of R. solani AG 2-2. Our correlation data indicates complicated relationships between aggressiveness of R. solani AG 2-2 on seedlings and adult roots, depending upon the crop. For instance, cultures of R. solani AG 2-2 (IV and IIIB) that are highly aggressive on sugarbeet seedlings also are aggressive on soybean, pinto bean and corn seedlings. Cultures of R. solani AG 2-2 pathogenic to adult sugarbeet roots are negatively correlated with pathogenicity on adult soybean and pinto bean roots. Overall, there was no correlation in pathogenicity of cultures of R. solani AG 2-2 on adult sugarbeet roots with seedlings of sugarbeet, bean crops, or corn, but cultures pathogenic to adult soybean and pinto bean were positively correlated with pathogenicity of seedlings of sugarbeet, soybean, pinto bean and corn. Despite these complicated relationships, it is clear that planting back-to-back crops susceptible to R. solani AG 2-2 is illadvised and should be avoided. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank the Sugarbeet Research and Education Board of Minnesota and North Dakota and the University of Minnesota for funding of this research; Jeff Nielson University of Minnesota, Northwest Research and Outreach Center, Crookston for technical assistance and data analysis; and student workers Chloe Danielson, Chelsie Solheim, Katie Baird, and Anthony Diaz for technical assistance. LITERATURE CITED 1. Brantner, J.R., and C.E. Windels. 2009. Prevalance and distribution of Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-2 ISGs in sugar beet-growing areas of Minnesota and North Dakota. (Abstr.). Phytopathology 99:S15.

2. Buhre, C., C. Kluth, K. Bürcky, B. Märländer, and M. Varrelmann. 2009. Integrated control of root and crown rot in sugar beet: Combined effects of cultivar, crop rotation, and soil tillage. Plant Dis. 93:155-161. 3. Engelkes, C.A., and C. E. Windels. 1994. Relationship of plant age, cultivar, and isolate of Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-2 to sugar beet root and crown rot. Plant Dis. 78:685-689. 4. Ithurrart, M.E., G. Buttner, and J. Petersen. 2004. Rhizoctonia root rot in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. altissima) Epidemiological aspects in relation to maize (Zea mays) as a host plant. J. Plant Disease Protection 111:302-312. 5. Ogoshi, A. 1987. Ecology and pathogenicity of anastomosis and intraspecific groups of Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 25:125-143. 6. Panella, L. 2005. Pathogenicity of different anastomosis groups and subgroups of Rhizoctonia solani on sugarbeet (Abstr.) J. Sugar Beet Res. 42:53. 7. Shehata, M.A., D.W. Davis, and N.A. Anderson. 1981. Screening peas for resistance to stem rot caused by Rhizoctonia solani. Plant Dis. 65:417-419. 8. Sneh, B., L. Burpee, and A. Ogoshi. 1991. Identification of Rhizoctonia species. American Phytopathological Society, APS Press, St. Paul, MN. 133 pp. 9. Strausbaugh, C.A., I.A. Eujayl, L.W. Panella, and L.E. Hanson. 2009. Genetic diversity and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia on sugarbeet. (Abstr.) J. Sugar Beet Res. 46:94. 10. Sumner, D.R. and D.K. Bell. 1982. Root diseases induced in corn by Rhizoctonia solani and Rhizoctonia zeae. Phytopathology 72:86-91. 11. Tinline, R.D., R.J. Ledingham, and B.J. Sallans. 1975. Appraisal of loss from common root rot in wheat. Pages 22-26 in: Biological Control of Soil-borne Plant Pathogens. G.W. Bruehl, ed., American Phytopathological Societiey, St. Paul, MN.