Severn River Sub-Watershed: BMP 09-Retrofit

Similar documents
Old Mill Community Association Bioretention Facility

Bioretention cell schematic key

R1a: REINFORCED TURF TO REPLACE GRAVEL /GRASS PARKING ADJACENT TO SOUTH PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE.

The use of low head weirs to. perennial streams with their floodplains:

Maryland Association of Floodplain and Stormwater Managers. State of the State - Stormwater Management October 12, 2017

Pollutant Removal Benefits

Draft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

Storm Water Quality and Shoreline Restoration Improvements - Grant Funding Request City of Mound Carlson Park Bolton & Menk Project No.

VA DCR STORMWATER DESIGN SPECIFICATION NO. 11 WET SWALE. VERSION 2.0 January 1, 2013 SECTION 1: DESCRIPTION

WQ-07 INFILTRATION TRENCH

North Branch of Cypress Creek Ecological Restoration: A Comprehensive Approach to Stream Restoration

Stormwater Retrofitting: The Art of Opportunity. Presented by the Center for Watershed Protection

When planning stormwater management facilities, the following principles shall be applied where possible.

ST. MARY S SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT (SMSCD) AND DPW&T CONCEPT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES AND CHECKLIST

CHAPTER 102 REQUIREMENTS CRITCAL STAGES DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES

Patrick E. Lindemann INGHAM COUNTY DRAIN COMMISSIONER. Towar Rain Garden Drains A Low-Impact Urban Retrofit

Alternatives Analysis Summary Memorandum

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY STORMWATER PROGRAM

4. Contractor (and subcontractors if applicable) certification statement(s)

Action Plan for Retrofitting Structural BMPs

2E-4 Bioretention Cells

2I-5 Bioswales (Numbering pending)

Baltimore, MD Lt. Gov. Boyd Rutherford

Going Green with the NYS Stormwater Design Standards

Inspection and Maintenance of Stormwater Best Management Practices

C-12. Dry Pond. Design Objective

Town of West Point Plan of Development

ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Anne Arundel County s Severn River Watershed Implementation Strategy. Severn River Association

CHECKLIST FOR PHASE II DRAINAGE REPORT

4.6. Low Impact and Retentive Grading

DCBP APPENDIX B Action Plan for Retrofitting Structural BMPs

The Flow. Green Infrastructure Taking Root in Cities 3/23/2015. Green Infrastructure Evolution City Plans/Projects Measureable and Holistic Benefits

SOP 6: Erosion and Sedimentation Control SOP 6: EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL

Rain Gardens Water Quality the Way Mother Nature Intended

MANUAL OF DESIGN, INSTALLATION, AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS

GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGNS RAIN GARDEN

Checklists. Project Name: Location: File Number: Date of Submittal: Reviewer: Date: Applicant: Contact Name: Phone Number:

Appendix K. Stormwater Management Plan

6.5 Lakewood Gulch. Basin Snapshot

Final Report: Appendix G. LID Driveway Retrofit and Teaching Tool at Bristol County Agricultural High School, Dighton - Supporting Information

DEALING WITH STORM WATER MANAGEMENT

FACT SHEET: Pervious Pavement with Infiltration

Key elements : Filter Strips must be designed within parameters required by the Fort Wayne s Development Standards/Criteria Manual.

CITY OF TUMWATER 555 ISRAEL RD. SW, TUMWATER, WA (360) (360) (FAX)

Final Report: Appendix F. LID Driveway Retrofit at Ocean Spray Processing Facility, Middleboro Supporting Information

Bioretention. Matt Scharver Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District. #ProjectCleanLake

Attachment 2: Permeable Pavement Design Guidelines

A. Regional Detention Requirements

SUPPORTING DOCUMENT STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE

Use of Best Management Practices

APPENDIX E DESIGN CRITERIA FOR POST-CONSTRUCTION WATER QUALITY BMPS

Huntington Stormwater Utility

Three Rivers Park District Administration Center Rain Garden

POST CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FOR "WHITE OAK SEWER INTERCEPTOR"

2.1.4 Roof Downspout Rain Gardens

A: Downtown Diversion Pipe

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT SWM GUIDELINES FOR STATE AND FEDERAL PROJECTS. 1.0 Purpose and Authority Incorporation by Reference

Planning the BMP. Region 2000 Planning District Commission Lynchburg, VA December 13, 20013

Evaluating Urban Stormwater Retrofits in the SE US Coastal Plain

Neighborhood-Scale Water Quality Improvements The Broadway Neighborhood Stormwater Greenway Project

Page 1 of 6. Table 1a Structural BMPs

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY STORMWATER PROGRAM

2008 SWMM, 2010 Revision City of Tacoma

Glencoe Elementary School Parking Lot Retrofit 825 SE 51 st Street

Table 4.7.1: Swales Potential Application and Storm Water Regulation

SECTION 6. Routine Maintenance Activity Details

City of Waco Stormwater Management Regulations

Section 3 Non-Structural BMPs

DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE

Design Considerations for Open Channel and Detention Pond Design. Howard Redfearn, City of Mansfield

Guidance on Preparation of Construction and Maintenance Costs

MATHEWS COUNTY RURAL DITCH ENHANCEMENT STUDY

Project Location. Jay and Patty Baker Park and Gordon River Greenway Connector Bridge. Naples Beach Golf Club. Gordon River. East. Naples.

WQ-23 MOUNTAINOUS AND STEEP SLOPE SITES

Public Meeting for the Redevelopment of. July 17,2018 7pm to 9pm Rolling Knolls Elementary School

LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN. APPENDIX G - Stormwater Study Findings & Stormwater Solutions

URBANIZED STREAM CORRIDOR: COMMUNITY APPROACH TO ADDRESS EROSION

Table of Contents. Preface... xv

Urban Conservation Practice Physical Effects ESTABLISHMENT, GROWTH, AND HARVEST NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

2018 Annual Landfill Inspection Report

Development of LID Design Guide in Edmonton

Erosion & Sediment Control Plan Application Form & Checklist

Post Construction BMPs

The Art and Science of Stormwater Retrofitting

Standard for Bioretention Systems

4.5 City of Indianapolis Stormwater Green Infrastructure Guidance: Bioretention (rain gardens) Bioretention Fact Sheet Bioretention Technical Design

Review Zone Application for D&R Canal Commission Decision

Local Stormwater Retrofit Case Studies. Westmoreland County Conservation District Updated 11/2011

6.1 Bioretention Areas

4.3.5 Bioretention Areas

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT LATHAM 200 MMSCFD GAS PROCESSING PLANT

Chapter 14. Stormwater Quality Introduction

Small Town Sustainable Stormwater Solutions

Construction Site Erosion Control

City of Stoughton Erosion Control Permit Application (effective 2/6/2018)

Preliminary Sediment & Stormwater Management Plan Review Checklist DATE RECEIVED: PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME:

There is an ongoing regulatory concern that

RETAINING RUNOFF AT ITS SOURCE

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CODES ANALYSIS RICHLAND COUNTY, SC SITE PLANNING ROUNDTABLE

Transcription:

Project ID: BMP_09 Total Treated Drainage Area: 4.57 acres Total Treated Impervious Area: 2.9 acres Total Water Quality Volume (WQv): ~10,300 cubic feet; 0.236 acre-foot Rainfall Depth Treated (Pe): 1 inch Annual Nutrient Removal: TN: 17.6 lbs TP: 1.6 lbs TSS: 0.5 ton Existing Site Description The existing pond is located at the BayWoods of Annapolis cooperative retirement community, east of the intersection of Bay Front Drive and Bembe Beach Road. A 24-inch corrugated polyethylene drainage pipe discharges to the pond and collects runoff from the BayWoods of Annapolis property. The pond has a perforated standpipe that drains to a non-tidal wetland filtering area via a 6-inch PVC pipe. Overflow is accommodated by a concrete weir upstream of gabion baskets and filter fabric to reduce runoff velocity and provide preliminary treatment prior to entering the wetland filtering area. The wetland filtering area drains directly to the Chesapeake Bay. The pond is located in the FEMA 100-year floodplain with a static base flood elevation of 5 feet North American Vertical Datum of 1988. The pond has an aerator and a fountain, although during field investigation water was brown and murky. There is ornamental vegetation around the pond and a footbridge crossing the pond. Neither sanitary sewer lines nor water lines were identified in the vicinity of the existing pond. The soils in the drainage area are hydrologic soil groups C and D, and the pond is located over hydrologic group D soils. The pond is located within the Limited Development Area (LDA); however, Anne Arundel County does not have additional requirements for stormwater management in the LDA. Figure 11 shows the existing conditions map with drainage area. Proposed Project Description The proposed project includes upgrading the existing pond to meet current stormwater management standards. The retrofitted wet pond will be designed using MDE s Stormwater Design Manual. Sediment will be removed from the pond as needed to reestablish the design volume, and a pretreatment sediment forebay will be created by installing a weir under the existing bridge. Placing a weir under the bridge will minimize negative aesthetic impacts, and given the high visibility of the pond, an aesthetically pleasing weir (e.g., a sinuous shape) is recommended. Maintenance access will be provided to the sediment forebay so sediment can be removed periodically. This will improve the water quality in the pond while meeting current BMP 09 D-23

MDE standards. The existing perforated standpipe may need to be replaced, although no changes to the overflow weir are proposed. Minimal excavation will be required within the pond, although some of the existing vegetation will need to be removed. A maximum slope of 3:1 (Horizontal: Vertical) is recommended for all proposed embankments. Geotechnical analysis will be required to identify the location of the groundwater table. Retrofitting the existing wet pond would reduce pollutants such as TN, TP, and TSS. This project will help the City of Annapolis achieve approximately 2.9 acres of impervious area credits toward its upcoming NPDES MS4 requirements. Figure 12 provides the schematic of the wet pond and Figure 13 provides the grading from the design plans. Based on the drainage area and site conditions at the existing pond a pocket wet pond appears to be the most appropriate retrofit at thesite, and Figure 14 provides the typical profile of a pocket pond. Feasibility Assessment Property Ownership Construction Access Utility Conflicts Environmental Impacts Design/Construction The property is owned by BayWoods of Annapolis, a cooperative retirement community. The City would need to coordinate with BayWoods of Annapolis to obtain permission to implement this project. The site can be accessed from the open grass areas south of the BayWoods of Annapolis building. Open area is available to stage construction activities. Existing slopes are navigable by construction equipment. There are no sanitary sewer lines or water lines in the project area. Though there were no indicators of underground electric service at the project site (i.e., no light poles or utility boxes), confirmation should be obtained during final design. No tree impacts are anticipated as part of this project. Geotechnical investigation will be required to determine the groundwater elevation in the project area during final design. If the pond qualifies as an MD-378 pond, any retrofit would also require upgrading the pond to meet the current MD-378 small pond standards. Plans and Permits The following plans and permits may be required for the implementation of this project: Site/Schematic Development Application Stormwater Management Plan Grading and Erosion Sediment Control Plan Temporary Traffic Control Plan MD-378 Pond Approval BMP 09 D-24

Cost Estimate Table 7: Cost Estimate for BMP 09 Retrofit Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Total Clear and Grub 350 SY $2.00 $700.00 Excavation and Hauling 350 CY $50.00 $17,500.00 Grading 350 SY $3.50 $1,225.00 Flow Diversion Structure 1 EA $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Rip-Rap 20 CY $130.00 $2,600.00 Stabilized Construction Entrance 1 EA $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Grass Seeding 350 SY $0.75 $262.50 Concrete Weir 30 CY $900.00 $27,000.00 Principle Spillway Riser Structure 1 EA $1,850.00 $1,850.00 CY - Cubic Yards SY - Square Yards EA - Each Initial Project Costs $63,138 LF - Linear Feet Contingency 20% $12,628 Erosion and Sediment Control 15% $9,471 Base Construction Costs $85,236 Mobilization 10% $8,524 Total Construction Cost 7 $93,760 20 Years Life Cycle Maintenance Cost 8 (Average Annual Maintenance Cost of $763) $15,260 Computations Table 8: Water Quality Volume (WQv) Calculations Design Parameters Site Value Treated Drainage Area (acres), A 4.57 Percent Impervious Cover, I 63% Rainfall Depth (inches), P 1 Volumetric Runoff Coefficient, R v 0.62 Water Quality Volume (acre-feet), WQ v 0.236 Water Quality Volume (cubic-feet), WQ v 10,300 7 Additional cost of approximately $100,000 for design, environmental services, geotechnical investigation, survey, and permitting is assumed. 8 University of Maryland. October 2011. Cost of Stormwater Management Practices in Maryland Counties. BMP 09 D-25

Figure 11: Existing Conditions and Drainage Area BMP 09 D-26

Figure 12: Proposed Retrofit Concept Design BMP 09 D-27

Figure 13: Site Grading from BayWoods of Annapolis 2000 Design Plans Figure 14: Typical Profile of a Pocket Pond (MDE 2000 Stormwater Design Manual) BMP 09 D-28

Site Photographs Existing Pond at BayWoods of Annapolis (facing east) Existing Pond at BayWoods of Annapolis Overflow Weir and Outfall Protection (facing northwest) BMP 09 D-29