EFFECT OF SELECTED FACTORS ON THE VALUE OF FORCE NECESSARY FOR REMOVING INDIVIDUAL SUGAR BEET ROOTS FROM SOIL. Józef Gorzelany

Similar documents
Denitrification and N 2 O production in subsoil in wheat-maize rotation field in North China Plain

Sugarbeets Enjoy Warm Winter

Wheat variety response to dry sowing and seeding depth

THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY

Pan-African Soybean Variety Trial Protocol Training. I

Identifying the SIX Critical Control Points in High Tunnel Production

Effect of Method of Application of Double Superphosphate on the Yield and Phosphorus Uptake by Sugar Beets 1

Hawaii Agriculture Research Center -1- Vegetable Report 2. Hawaii Agriculture Research Center Vegetable Report 2 January 2000

Agritechnica 2016 Soil Compaction in Grassland. John Maher Teagasc, Ireland

Oskars Balodis, Zinta Gaile Latvia University of Agriculture Abstract

Growth and Quality of Oriental Lilies at Different Fertilization Levels

Research on the influence of seed tuber size and planting density on the yield of potato grown on sandy soils

Water content at pf2 as a characteristic in soil-cultivation research in the Netherlands

Comparison Blackberry Production Under High Tunnels and Field Conditions. High Tunnels

Assessing Soil Health: Building Resilience Following a Wet Harvest

Getting Started with Your Vegetable Garden

Effects of Phosphorus and Calcium on Tuber Set, Yield, and Quality in Goldrush Potato

Crop Management Details Start from Parameters settings Emergence Planting Seed brand: Settings Parameter settings Hybrid-specific Generic

Section 5: Vegetables and Bulbs

The Kalahari Melon Seed Breeding Project FARMERS FIELD TESTING OF IMPROVED KMS CROSSES. GUIDELINES, January 2009

APPLICATION METHOD AND RATE OF QUADRIS FOR CONTROL OF RHIZOCTONIA CROWN AND ROOT ROT. Jason R. Brantner and Carol E. Windels

Mechanisms of Nutrient Uptake: Is Fertilization Enough?

Examining soils in the field. Examining soils in the field. Environment Agency thinksoils examining soils in the field

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

INFLUENCE OF LOW FREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION ON SUNFLOWER SEEDS GERMINATION

Radish VEGETABLE CROPS PRODUCTION GUIDE FOR THE ATLANTIC PROVINCES. Prepared by the ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON VEGETABLE CROPS

Fall Vegetable Gardening

Agronomy of Castor Beans. Crop Research Unit Research & Development Division Ministry of Industry Commerce Agriculture & Fisheries

ROTATION CROP EFFECTS ON RHIZOCTONIA DISEASES OF SUGARBEET IN INFESTED FIELDS. Carol E. Windels and Jason R. Brantner

PLANTING RECOMMENDATIONS

CERCOSPORA BETICOLA INSENSITIVITY IN MICHIGAN AND MICHIGAN SUGAR COMPANY S RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES

USE OF SOME SELECTED WASTES AS SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL INPUTS

Tilth: Tilth: Soil Structure and its Management. Tilth: Soil Structure and its Management

Impact of strategic tillage methods on water infiltration into repellent sands

Information Note Choosing a Cover Crop. Crimson Clover

The Nature of Soil Soil Conservation Sustainable Ag.

Effects of Planting Dates and Varieties on Growth and Yield of Broccoli During Rainy Season

AN ASSESSMENT OF STRENGHT PROPERTIES OF. Diti Hengchaovanich and Nimal S. Nilaweera 1

Pistachio Project Planning, Irrigation Systems and Irrigation Management. Trevor Sluggett Irrigation Agronomist AgriExchange Pty Ltd

EFFECT OF COMPACTION ON THE UNSATURATED SHEAR STRENGTH OF A COMPACTED TILL

Soil Structure, Cultivations and Crop Establishment: CSF, Thetford January Why is soil structure important? Philip Wright

Soil quality indicators & plant growth

Effects of Seedling Container Size and Nursing Period on the Growth, Flowering, and Yield of Cut Flowers in Snapdragons (Antirrhinum majus L.

Learning Objectives Part 1. Chapter 4 Soil Physical Properties. Soil Physical Properties. Color. Physical properties part 1

Effect of soil works and sowing time on yield in winter two-row barley

USE OF PRECISION AGRICULTURE TECHNOLOGY TO EVALUATE SOIL COMPACTION

Eco new farmers. Module 2 Soil and Nutrient Cycling. Section 1 Soils and soil fertility

0.40 Argent-Loblolly Pine. Clarksville-Shortleaf Pine 0.20 Dome-Ponderosa Pine Cohasset-Ponderosa Pine

EFFECT OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS AND STAGES OF SPRAY ON SEED QUALITY OF RIDGE GOURD (Luffa acutangula L. ROXB)

The Effect of Potassium Humate, Chicken Feathers and Vermicompost on the Water Retention Curve

2016 Tillage Radish Planting Date x Seeding Rate Trial

J. Natn. Sci. Coun. Sri Lanka (2):

Effects of the Bupa retirement complex on the soil resources at 25 & 35 Ulyatt Road, Napier

A water dispersible granule formulation containing 75% w/w amidosulfuron, a sulfonylurea.

Avocado sensitivity to salinity revisited Akko Experiment

Swelling Treatment By Using Sand for Tamia Swelling Soil

CROP HUSBANDRY AND HORTICULTURE

EFFECT OF INCLUSION OF BIORAISER POWDER IN GROWING MEDIA ON GRASS GROWTH AND WATER RETENTION OF THE GROWING MEDIA

1. Describe three hazards and/or limitations of using tractors with implements attachments on hilly ground. Answer:

The Potash Development Association Potash for Sugar Beet

Soil Structure in Relation to Beet Growth

Forcing Containerized Roses in a Retractable Roof Greenhouse and Outdoors in a Semi-Arid Climate

Paul Vossen University of California Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor. Dealing with Drought

R2113 UNDERSTANDING THE PRODUCTION OF OUTDOOR VEGETABLES & FRUIT

The comparison of thermal and mechanical systems of weed control

Soil Loading Effects of Planter Depth-Gauge Wheels on Early Corn Growth

2016 Iowa FFA Soils Evaluation CDE Exam

Effects of seed-applied fungicides on root growth of wheat under controlled conditions and in open fields

conditions, GA 3 50 ppm treated plants took maximum number of days for flower formation while the plants under control recorded delayed flowering.

Eggplant Production IDEA-NEW

The contributions to the amelioration of the industrial quality of Virginia type tobacco cultivated on low productive soils

TISSUE ANALYSIS. Elmer G. Terrell I/ New York Conservation Department

Plant Tissue Testing as a Guide to Side-Dressing Sugar Beets 1

Comparison of establishment of seeded couch vs sprigged couch cultivars

OPTIMISING CROP ESTABLISHIMENT IN PROCESSING CARROTS

IMPROVE YIELDS Increasing the production from your homestead garden. Home Gardening and Nutrition Training Material

Save My Exams! The Home of Revision For more awesome GCSE and A level resources, visit us at Ecosystems.

Unit B: Establishing a Fruit Garden. Lesson 3: Growing and Maintaining Small Fruits

A study of the plants produced by different methods of vegetative propagation in mango (cvs. Amrapali and Gopalbhog)

Summary: Introduction: Selecting lavender cultivars for the Okanagan valley of British Columbia, Canada

Vegetable Gardening. Courtney Keck, M.S. Horticulture Horticulture/4-H Educator Canadian County OSU Extension

THE ROLE OF SUCTION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CLAY FILL RONALD F. REED, P.E. 1 KUNDAN K. PANDEY, P.E. 2

The Study on the Plant Growth Hormones in EM A Case Study

Effect of planting time on growth and flowering of Gladiolus

Appendix D: Soil Depletion Model

4. How to Make a Trench Bed

Establishment, growth and development of plantain and chicory under grazing

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching this

Comparison of Field Seeding of Sugar Beets and Mangel Wurzels with Two Methods of Transplanting 1

Virginia Tech VIRGINIA POLYTEHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY

Group 2 Herbicide Interactions and Approaches to Detection in Soils

PRODUCTION OF HIGH QUALITY BULBOUS FLOWERS IN POTHWAR

Full Season Comparison of Weather Based Smart Controllers

SOIL LOADING EFFECTS OF PLANTER DEPTH GAUGE WHEELS ON EARLY CORN GROWTH

Asparagus Response to Water and Nitrogen

EFFECT OF IN-FURROW FUNGICIDE APPLICATION METHOD ON CONTROL OF RHIZOCTONIA AND SUGARBEET STAND ESTABLISHMENT. Jason R. Brantner and Jeffrey D.

Journal of Engineering Studies and Research Volume 23 (2017) No. 2 16

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT

Soil moisture extraction and physiological wilting of cotton on Mississippi River alluvial soils

EFFECT OF TUBER PLACEMENT ON YELLOW NUTSEDGE REPRODUCTION

Transcription:

TEKA Kom. Mot. Energ. Roln., 006, 6A, 53 60 EFFECT OF SELECTED FACTORS ON THE VALUE OF FORCE NECESSARY FOR REMOVING INDIVIDUAL SUGAR BEET ROOTS FROM SOIL Department of Production Engineering, Rzeszów University M. Ćwiklińskiej Str., 35-60 Rzeszów, Poland e-mail: zipr@univ.rzeszow.pl Summary. Force measurements, taken in the process of sugar beet roots removing from soil, served as the basis for determining the effect of selected geometric features of beet roots on the value of that force. The variation of the value of that force was studied on three selected plots depending on cultivar, soil compactness and soil moisture content. Irrespectively of root size, cultivar and plot, the average values of these forces were differed and were within 399 690 N. In several cases these force values exceeded 900 N. Key words: sugar beet, geometric features, soil, energy INTRODUCTION Despite using modern techniques in sugar beet cultivation, especially in the process of beet root harvesting, there is a persistent risk of quantitative and qualitative losses of biological material. According to many authors [Bzowska-Bakalarz 994, Byszewski et al. 997, Malec 997, Ostrowska and Wzorek 998], the level of these losses, as well as that of the energy input during harvest are determined by, in addition to soil and climatic conditions, the physical properties of sugar beet roots. For the economic and strength considerations of harvesting machines, the characteristic of basic importance for the designers is the knowledge about energy consumption/demand in the process of root extraction from the soil [Gorzelany and Noworól 998]. Soil conditions, such as soil compaction and soil moisture, combined with meteorological conditions during harvest, affect the changes of forces necessary for beetroot extraction most significantly [Bzowska-Bakalarz and Szklarz 987, Gorzelany and Bzowska-Bakalarz 999, Gorzelany and Noworól 998, Gorzelany 00]. The value of the force necessary for sugar-beetroot pullout is also affected by the differences in their structure, geometric shape characteristics and the height to which they grow above the soil level. The relationships between those characteristics and the sugar-beetroot cultivar, cultivation technology, fertilization, irrigation and environmental conditions have al-

54 ready been studied [Byszewski et al.. 98, 997], but comprehensive measurements of the effects of these factors on energy demand for beetroot extraction from soil are not available. RESEARCH OBJECTIVE AND RANGE The research aimed at defining the effect of soil conditions on the geometric characteristics of sugar beetroots and the value of the force necessary to pull out individual beetroots from soil. The research was conducted in 004 on a farm in the Zarzecze village in Podkarpackie province. Three objects (fields, plots) with sugar beetroot cultivation of approx. 0.5 ha each, were selected. Plot I was a loess soil of class IIIa on clay substrate, with onion as preceding crop; plot II silt soil of class IIIb, with winter wheat as the preceding crop, plot III loess soil of class IIIa, with winter wheat as the preceding crop. Two sugar beetroot cultivars, (Strube Dickmann) and (Advanta), were sown on each plot. Once the preceding crops were harvested on the studied plots, subsoil ploughing was carried to the depth of approx. 50 cm. Mustard, Metex cultivar, was sown at mid August on plots II and III in a quantity of 0 kg ha -. On the 9 th Oct. 003 all plots were ploughed for winter to a depth of approx. 8 cm. In the spring (9 th April 004), upon fertilizing the field prior to sowing, cultivation aggregator was used to even and loosen the soil. Sugar beetroot seeds were sown with single seeder on the next day. After beetroot sowing (from the st May 004) chemical treatments against weeds, diseases and pests were carried out on the studied plots. The last such treatment (against Cercospora beticola Sacc.) was performed on the 7 th Aug. 004. RESEARCH MATERIALS AND METHODS In autumn 004, just before beetroot harvesting, the soil moisture and compaction were measured individually for each plot. The moisture of soil samples was determined with drier method. Manual, spring-load soil probe (compaction meter), designed and made by the Polish Academy of Sciences Institute of Agro-physics in Lublin, was utilized to measure soil compactness at the depth of 0 0 cm. Then, 60 roots in three sizes (fractions; small roots of 6 9 cm, medium roots of 9 cm and large roots of more than cm) from two neighboring rows on each of the studied plots, were topped with the use of manual striper/topper. The height of root head above the soil surface was measured after topping. The measurements of the force necessary for pulling individual beetroots from soil were taken with an instrument designed in the Department of Agricultural Engineering of Rzeszow University. The instrument consists of a stand supported on four vertical supports with a pulley and steel line connected to servo-cylinder of 0 KN range. Roots are pulled out of soil with a screw that is screwed into root head and connected, through a holder, with a force gauge. Individual roots were pulled out manually using a crank with slow force incrementing. Once the roots were removed from soil the value of the used force was read from the force-gauge scale and their length and diameter was measured with a slide caliper.

EFFECT OF SELECTED FACTORS ON THE VALUE... 55 On the basis of the measurements, the mean height of beetroot head above the soil surface, mean root length and the mean soil penetration by beetroots were determined. Also, the number of plants per hectare and the theoretical sugar beetroot crop yield on the studied plots were determined. RESEARCH RESULTS The soil moisture, as measured and calculated at the depth of 0 5 cm, was found to be the highest on the plot II (silt soil) with mean level of.6%. The lowest soil moisture was recorded on plot I (loess on clay) 6.4%. The mean value of soil moisture on plot III (loess soil) was at 9.3%. The subsoil ploughing of the studied plots in autumn, as well as favorable climatic conditions on the harvest day, contributed to soil loosening, with the resulting low soil compaction of 0.5 MPa. Table presents the number of plants per hectare on individual plots and the theoretical sugar beetroot crop yield, with seeds sown in rows, 8 cm from each other, with row spacing of 45 cm. I II Object Table. Planting (density) and theoretical yield of sugar beet roots Variety Density tys. szt ha - 95.3 86.6 8.5 80.3 9.8 87.0 Yield t ha - 68.4 64.5 54. 49.9 66.7 63.8 At harvest time the highest number of plants per hectare was recorded for the cultivar on plots I and III (more than 9 thousand plants per hectare). These same plots produced also the highest crop yield per hectare for that cultivar. Plot I 68.4 t ha - and plot III 66.7 t ha -. The lowest number of plants per hectare and crop yield per hectare was found on plot II with the cultivar, 80.3 and 49.9 t ha -, respectively. Refer to Table for selected geometric characteristics of sugar beetroots on the studied plots, as well as mean values of forces necessary for pulling them out of soil. Roots on plot III had the longest mean lengths (33.4 cm), while those on plot II were the shortest (with the mean of 3.5 cm). On plots I and III the differences in root lengths between cultivars were small, whereas on plot II the roots of the cultivar were observed to be longer on average by 3.4%, compared to the cultivar. The mean value of root diameter for both cultivars on the three plots differed slightly and ranged within 0.4 and 0.7 cm. The height of sugar beetroot head projection above the soil surface ranged from 3.0 cm on plot II to 4.0 cm on plot I. The greatest root penetration depth was recorded on the plot III.3 cm for the cultivar, whereas on plot II beetroots of the cultivar penetrated their soil to the mean depth of 4. cm. The mean depth of root penetration on the studied plots was 8.3 cm for the two analyzed cultivars. Independently of the plot and the root size the mean values of force

56 necessary for their extraction differed widely within 399 and 690 N. In several cases the recorded force exceeded 900 N (the maximum force was 90 N). A large standard deviation from the mean value of force for a certain fraction of roots and penetrations are the evidence to a wide range of forces necessary for pulling beetroots from soil (Fig., ). Table. Geometrical characteristics of sugar beetroots on the objects and average values of F force required for extracting sugar beetroots from the soil. Object Variety I I Measurement of roots Height Soil Force Root Lenght Diameter Weight topping penetration F max size cm cm g cm cm N Small 30.8 8.4 55 3.6 0.0 505 Medium 9.6 0.4 835 3.3 0.8 57 Big 30.8.9 63 4. 0.6 655 Small 6.5 7.9 486 4. 6.9 406 Medium 30.5 0.6 9 4.3 9.5 50 Big 3.9 3. 638 4.7 9.4 557 Average 30. 0.5 997 4.0 9.5 533 value Small 9. 8.0 40.4.6 408 Medium 3. 0.4 796 3. 5. 478 Big 3.3.8 496 3.4 4.9 533 Small.8 8.0 36.48 4.4 399 Medium 7.7 0. 758 3. 6.8 48 Big 5. 3.0 493 3.3 6. 53 Average 3.5 0.4 884 3.0 5.0 47 value Small 3.6 8.0 499.9 0. 40 II Medium 3.6. 894 3. 0.3 570 Big 36.0.9 679 4.5 3.3 690 Small 3. 8.0 459 3. 9.3 404 II Medium 3.3 0.4 849 3.4 9. 473 Big 35.0.7 67 4.7 0.7 585 Average value 33.4 0.7 00 3.6 0.5 54 Overall Small 7.3 8.0 453 3. 7. 44 Medium 9.3 0.7 840 3.4 8.6 5 Big 30.5.9 59 4. 9. 59 Average 9.0 0.5 96 3.5 8.3 509 value The trend lines for the force F necessary for pulling individual beetroots from soil, depending on their diameter and soil penetration on the studied plots, are presented in Fig. 4. The curve of the relationship of force necessary for pulling beetroots from soil versus beetroot diameter and soil penetration is described with the square function of the second degree. The analysis of the relationship between the force F necessary for pulling individual beetroots from soil and their diameters on three studied plots (Fig. 3) shows

EFFECT OF SELECTED FACTORS ON THE VALUE... 57 that the determination coefficients, R, were high and ranged from 0.7 for the cultivar on plot I to 0.97 for the cultivar on plot III. The effect of root penetration on the value of force necessary for pulling beetroots from soil on the studied plots was also significant, as reflected by the values of the determination coefficients, R, within 0.46 and 0.75. 7 8 9 0 3 4 Small Medium Big 6 7 8 9 0 Soil penetration [cm] I 00 7 8 9 0 3 4 Small Medium Big 00 3 4 5 6 7 8 Soli penetration[cm] II 7 8 9 0 3 4 8 9 0 3 4 Soil penetration [cm] Small Medium Big Fig.. The average values of force F necessary to remove individual roots from soil as well as standard deviations from their average values depending on root diameter and root soil penetration

58 ) y = 0,495x + 3,0x + 75,43 R = 0,966 y = -6,7679x + 70,5x - 495,66 R = ) 0,759 6 7 8 9 0 3 4 5 Średnica [cm] ( I y = -0,0745x + 7,93x + 96,66 R = 0,873 () y = -,4456x + 57,07x + 38,789 R = 0,934 6 7 8 9 0 3 4 5 Średnica II y = -,953x + 93,403x - 98,3 R = 0,9709 y = 4,4577x - 53,3x + 54,57 R = 0,9545 6 7 8 9 0 3 4 5 Średnica [cm] () Variety:, Fig.. Force F necessary for removing individual sugar beetroots from soil on the selected plots versus root size and cultivar.

EFFECT OF SELECTED FACTORS ON THE VALUE... 59 () y = -7,0494x + 78,04x - 50,4 R = 0,779 (3) y =,868x -,57x + 36,33 R = 0,8674 3 y = -,708x + 83,495x - 9,93 R = 0,994 7 8 9 0 3 4 Diameter Średnica [cm] () y = -0,4973x + 63,68x - 497,47 R = 0,683 y = -5,647x + 9,09x - 0,6 R = 0,468 y = -7,3983x + 380,4x - 449,4 R = 0,757 4 6 8 0 4 (3) Soil Zagłębienie penetration [cm] 3 object I object II object III 3 Fig. 3. Trend lines of the values of force F necessary for removing individual sugar beetroots from soil depending on root diameter and root soil penetration CONCLUSIONS. The soil compaction on the studied plots to a depth of 5 cm did not exceed 0.5 MPa, whereas the mean values of soil moisture at the depth of 0 cm were: 6.4,.6 and 9.3% for plots I, II and III, respectively.. Roots of sugar beets of the two studied cultivars differed in their geometric characteristics. Roots from plot III were the longest, 33.4 cm on average, while those from plot II had the shortest average of 3.5 cm. Roots from plot III exhibited the maximum mean soil penetration of 0.5 cm and those from the plot II penetrated the soil only by 5 cm (the minimum mean).

60 3. The mean values of forces necessary to pull out individual undisturbed roots of sugarbeets from soil were within the range of 399 and 690 N. In single cases the values of these forces exceeded 900 N. 4. The value of force necessary to pull a beetroot out of its soil was affected by root diameter (correlation coefficients were 0.88, 0.99 and 0.9 on plots I, II and III, respectively) as well as the soil penetration (correlation coefficients of 0.68, 0.8 and 0.86 for plots I, II and III, respectively). 5. On plots I and III beetroots of cultivar were found to penetrate the soil deeper and required higher mean forces for pulling them out. REFERENCES Byszewski W., Haman J., Ostrowska D., Wzorek H. 98: Podstawowe właściwości fizyczne przemysłowych buraków cukrowych. Post. Nauk Roln., 3, 3 0. Byszewski W., Kalinowska-Zdun M., Ostrowska D., Szklarska J. 997: Wpływ sposobu uprawy na waŝniejsze właściwości buraków cukrowych. Post. Nauk Roln., 77, 3, 37 5. Bzowska-Bakalarz M., Szklarz J. 987: Badania niektórych właściwości fizycznych korzeni buraków cukrowych. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln., 36, 9 4. Bzowska-Bakalarz M. 994: Właściwości mechaniczne korzeni buraków cukrowych. Rozprawa habilitacyjna. AR Lublin. Gorzelany J., Bzowska-Bakalarz M. 999: Effect of soil conditions and mechanical characteristics of sugar beet roots on the value of force necessary for pulling them out. Int. Agrophysics, 3, 439 444. Gorzelany J., Noworól M. 998: Badanie zmienności cech fizycznych korzeni buraków cukrowych mających wpływ na wartość siły potrzebnej do ich wyciągnięcia z gleby. Zesz. Nauk. AR w Krakowie, 54, 573 577. Gorzelany J. 00: Determination of force neccesery for pulling out of sugar beet roots during harvest [in:] Agricultural engineering on the beginning of st century. Agrotech. Nitra, 43 47. Malec J. 997: Starty przy zbiorze buraków cukrowych. Mech. Roln., 0, 30 33. Ostrowska D., Wzorek H. 998: Właściwości fizyczne korzeni buraków cukrowych. Gazeta Cukrownicza,, 8.