Semiannual Maintenance and Calibration Report Prepared by Air Resource Specialists, Inc. Client: National Park Service Field Personnel: Mike Slate Site: Canyonlands National Park (CANY-IS) Service Date(s): 12/15/215 to 12/16/215 Site Operator: Joe Carlson Subject: Semi-Annual Maintenance All site visit and calibration forms are attached, detailing the pre- and post-maintenance calibrations and test results. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS GASEOUS POLLUTANT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT Zero-Air System (Werther / Panther Compressor PC7/4E): Maintenance - No maintenance for the pump or compressor was required at this time. The media for the zero-air system was replaced. Station Temperature: Pre-Maintenance Testing - The sensor was compared against a certified temperature transfer standard. The sensor was found to be responding within calibration acceptance criteria. GASEOUS POLLUTANT ANALYZERS Ozone Analyzer (Thermo 49c): Pre-Maintenance Testing - The ozone analyzer was compared against a Level 2 ozone transfer standard. The ozone analyzer was found to be responding within calibration acceptance criteria. Maintenance - This analyzer was removed and replaced with 49i to match the onsite transfer standard which is a 49i. Post-Maintenance Testing - The ozone analyzer was compared against a Level 2 ozone transfer standard. The ozone analyzer was found to be responding within calibration acceptance criteria. Ozone Station Reference (Thermo 49i): Pre-Maintenance Testing - The ozone station reference was compared against a Level 2 ozone transfer standard. The ozone station reference was found to be responding within calibration acceptance criteria. Maintenance - The photometer lamp intensity was increased, the tubes were cleaned, and the cooling fan filter was replaced. Post-Maintenance Testing - The ozone station reference was compared against a Level 2 ozone transfer standard. The ozone station reference was found to be responding within calibration acceptance criteria.
METEOROLOGICAL SENSORS Ambient Temperature and Vertical Temperature Difference (Climatronics 193): Pre-Maintenance Testing - The sensor was compared against a certified temperature transfer standard in three water baths controlled at temperatures between and 5 degrees Celsius. The sensor was confirmed to be responding within calibration acceptance criteria. Relative Humidity (Rotronic MP61): Pre-Maintenance Testing - The sensor was collocated with a certified relative humidity transfer standard. The sensor was confirmed to be responding within calibration acceptance criteria. The aspirator fan was functioning correctly. Maintenance - The sensor was replaced with a recently refurbished unit. Post-Maintenance Testing - The sensor was collocated with a certified relative humidity transfer standard. The sensor was confirmed to be responding within calibration acceptance criteria. Wind Speed (Climatronics 175): Pre-Maintenance Testing - The sensor was challenged with a certified anemometer drive. The sensor was confirmed to be responding within calibration acceptance criteria. The starting threshold test for the sensor was within acceptance criteria. The heater for the sensor was found to be functioning incorrectly. Maintenance - The sensor was replaced with a recently refurbished unit. Post-Maintenance Testing - The sensor was challenged with a certified anemometer drive. The sensor was confirmed to be responding within calibration acceptance criteria. The starting threshold test for the sensor was within acceptance criteria. The heater for the sensor was functioning correctly. Wind Direction (Climatronics 176): Pre-Maintenance Testing - The reference alignment for the sensor was checked using a compass. The reference alignment for the sensor was confirmed to be within acceptable limits. The accuracy of the sensor was tested by comparison to a reference. The sensor was confirmed to be responding within calibration acceptance criteria. The linearity of the sensor was within acceptable limits. The starting threshold test results were within acceptance criteria. The heater for the sensor was confirmed to be functioning incorrectly. Maintenance - The sensor was replaced with a recently refurbished unit. Post-Maintenance Testing - The reference alignment for the sensor was checked using a compass. The reference alignment for the sensor was confirmed to be within acceptable limits. The accuracy of the sensor was tested by comparison to a reference. The sensor was confirmed to be responding within calibration acceptance criteria. The linearity of the sensor was within acceptable limits. The starting threshold test for the sensor was within acceptance criteria. The heater for the sensor was functioning correctly. Solar Radiation (Li-Cor Pyranometer): Pre-Maintenance Testing - The sensor was collocated with a certified solar radiation transfer standard. The sensor was confirmed to be responding within calibration acceptance criteria. The sensor was found to be level and clean. Maintenance - No maintenance was required.
Post-Maintenance Testing - The sensor was collocated with a certified solar radiation transfer standard. The sensor was confirmed to be responding within calibration acceptance criteria. Precipitation (Climatronics 158): Pre-Maintenance Testing - The sensor was challenged using a known volume of water. The sensor was found responding within calibration acceptance criteria. The sensor was found to be level and clean. The heater was found to be functional. PARTICULATE MONITORS AND SAMPLERS CASTNET Filter Pack Flow: Pre-Maintenance Testing - A leak check on the system was performed and results were within acceptable limits. The flow was checked using a certified flow standard measuring flow in standard conditions. The measured flow was found to be within calibration acceptance criteria. Maintenance - The pump was rebuilt, the fittings were cleaned, and the inline filter was replaced. Post-Maintenance Testing - The flow was checked using a certified flow standard measuring flow in standard conditions. The measured flow was confirmed to be within calibration acceptance criteria. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS The shelter is showing its age. This shelter is an old custom wooden shelter. A park electrician recently added some additional outlets to minimize and electrical safety issues in the shelter.
SITE INFORMATION ABBR. CANY SITE NAME NETWORK TYPE CLIENT NPS FIELD SPECIALIST M. Slate DATE 12/15/215 Boneyard DATE OF LAST VISIT 6/8/215 NPS LATITUDE LONGITUDE North West Deg Min Sec --CALCULATE-> Decimal Decimal 38.6251 19.8213 --CALCULATE-> Deg Min Sec 38 37 3.4 19 49 16.7 ELEVATION Meters --CALCULATE-> Feet Feet 5869 --CALCULATE-> Meters 1789 DAY TIME IN TIME OUT 12/15/215 14 18 12/16/215 83 15 SITE STANDARDS PM Flow Reference Please verify site standards used by the site operator MANUFACTURER MODEL SERIAL # NA Calibration Expiration Date NOTES:
TEMPERATURE / VERTICAL TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCE SYSTEM VERIFICATION & CALIBRATION ABBR. CANY CLIENT NPS FIELD SPECIALIST M. Slate DATE 12/15/215 SITE NAME Boneyard DATE OF LAST VISIT 6/8/215 Network type NPS MANUFACTURER MODEL SERIAL NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE Temperature Reference Eutechnics 44 38288 2/23/216 Serial Number Climatronics 188-2 578 List sensors according to height on tower, from highest to lowest. Serial Number 188-2 578 Temp. Deltas CALIBRATION ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (<=) Ambient Temperature Difference ( o C).2 Vertical Temperature Difference ( o C).1 Bath Temp ( o C).1.23.22 14.15 14.14 -.1 46.4 46.44.4 MAX ABS Difference.22 MAX ABS Difference Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Each sensor was verified against its data channel? Yes No N/A Each Temperature Difference = Upper - Lower? Yes No N/A Bath Temp ( o C) MAX ABS Difference MAX ABS Difference NOTES:
STATION TEMPERATURE SENSOR VERIFICATION & CALIBRATION ABBR. CANY CLIENT NPS FIELD SPECIALIST M. Slate DATE SITE NAME Boneyard DATE OF LAST VISIT Network type NPS 12/15/215 6/8/215 Temperature Reference MANUFACTURER Eutechnics MODEL SERIAL NUMBER 44 38288 EXPIRATION DATE 2/23/216 CALIBRATION ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (<=) Temperature Difference ( o C) 2. Temperature Reference ( o C) DAS ( o C) Difference Reference ( o C) 22.8 22.29 -.5 22.5 21.91 -.6 DAS ( o C) Temperature Difference NOTES:
RELATIVE HUMIDITY SENSOR VERIFICATION & CALIBRATION ABBR. CANY CLIENT NPS FIELD SPECIALIST M. Slate DATE SITE NAME Boneyard DATE OF LAST VISIT Network type NPS 12/15/215 6/8/215 RH SENSOR REFERENCE MANUFACTURER Rotronic MODEL Hygroclip SERIAL NUMBER 239863 EXPIRATION DATE 7/13/216 Serial Number Rotronic MP61A 5264 Serial Number Rotronic MP61A 526 FIELD CALIBRATION ACCEPT. CRITERIA (<=) Relative Humidity Difference (%) 5% Hour 4 5 6 7 Relative Humidity (%) Relative Humidity (%) STD DAS Difference V Hour STD DAS Difference 7.1% 65.9% -4.2% 1 52.5% 57.1% 4.6% 66.9% 65.4% -1.5% 11 53.4% 58.4% 5.% 66.5% 66.2% -.3% 68.4% 68.1% -.3% V Average -1.6% Average 4.8% Aspirator fan functional? Yes No N/A NOTES: RH replaced at 93 logger time on 12/16/15.
WIND SPEED SENSOR VERIFICATION & CALIBRATION ABBR. CANY CLIENT NPS FIELD SPECIALIST M. Slate DATE 12/15/215 SITE NAME Boneyard DATE OF LAST VISIT 6/8/215 Network type NPS MANUFACTURER MODEL SERIAL NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE Wind Speed Reference RM Young 1882 CA 387 2/26/216 Wind Speed Torque Gauge RM Young 1831 NA and Climatronics - 175 / and Climatronics - 175 / Heavy Duty Aluminum Heavy Duty Aluminum Sensor Serial # 152 Sensor Serial # 1478 / NPS 985 Cups Serial # 1144 Cups Serial # 1144 CALIBRATION ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (<=) Wind Speed Difference (m/s) Wind Speed Difference (%).2 5.% if wind speed <= 5 m/s if wind speed > 2 m/s Wind Speed Threshold (m/s vs % Diff.) 5. 2. Select UNITS m/s Motor Speed (rpm) Target Speed. 3 7.274 6 14.325 9 21.375 12 28.426 18 42.527 Wind Speed DAS Difference.23 N/A N/A N/A 7.298.3% 14.58 1.8% 22.38 4.7% 28.47.2% 42.63.2% Starting Threshold Torque <=.3 g-cm TORQUE.1 NO ACTION REQUIRED Heater sleeve functional? Yes No N/A Wind Speed Motor Speed (rpm) Target Speed DAS Difference..25 N/A N/A N/A 3 7.274 7.288.2% 6 14.325 14.36.2% 9 21.375 21.34 -.2% 12 28.426 28.43.% 18 42.527 42.55.1% Starting Threshold Torque <=.3 g-cm TORQUE.1 NO ACTION REQUIRED NOTES: Heaters were not plugged in upon arrival.
WIND DIRECTION SENSOR VERIFICATION & CALIBRATION ABBR. CANY CLIENT NPS FIELD SPECIALIST M. Slate DATE 12/15/215 SITE NAME Boneyard DATE OF LAST VISIT 6/8/215 Network type NPS Direction Alignment Reference Direction Linearity Reference Direction Torque Gauge MANUFACTURER MODEL SERIAL NUMBER Brunton 56LM 5645265 RM Young 18212 NA RM Young 18331 NA EXPIRATION DATE & Sensor Serial # Vane Serial # Climatronics - 176 & Climatronics - 176 15 / NPS 9833 Sensor Serial # 2228 / NPS 9124 351 Vane Serial # 351 Local Magnetic Declination (degrees) 1.5 Method Sun Azimuth CALIBRATION ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (<=) Cross-arm Alignment Error (degrees) N/A Total Align. Diff (degrees) 5 Sensor Linearity (degrees) 3 Mag. Dec. from NOAA (deg/min/sec) 1.5 1.5 http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/geomag-web/#declination Landmarks Degrees From the North From the South 18 From the East 9 From the West 27 Is the Reference Alignment intended to be N-S? YES Is the Reference Alignment intended to be N-S? YES Reference Alignment (degrees). Reference Alignment (degrees). SENSOR ALIGNMENT N-S Reference Degrees DAS From the North 359. From the South 18 179. From the East 9 88. From the West 27 269. Total Alignment MAX ABS Diff OR SENSOR ALIGNMENT Landmark Degrees DAS Difference Landmark Degrees DAS Difference OR Difference -1. -1. -2. -1. 2. SENSOR ALIGNMENT N-S Reference Degrees DAS From the North 358.5 From the South 18 179.5 From the East 9 89. From the West 27 27. Total Alignment MAX ABS Diff SENSOR ALIGNMENT SENSOR ALIGNMENT X Reference Degrees DAS Difference X Reference Degrees DAS Align with Ref (N) 18 Align with Ref (S) 18 9 Perp with Ref (E) 9 27 Perp with Ref (W) 27 Total Alignment MAX ABS Diff Total Alignment MAX ABS Diff OR SENSOR ALIGNMENT From the North From the North From the South 18 From the South 18 From the East 9 From the East 9 From the West 27 From the West 27 Total Alignment MAX ABS Diff Total Alignment MAX ABS Diff OR Difference -1.5 -.5-1.. 1.5 Difference SENSOR LINEARITY Point DAS 1 74. 2 118.7 3 164.2 4 29.7 5 165.4 6 12.2 7 75.9 8 3.8 1 347.6 MAX Difference Difference N/A 1 1 1 2 2 SENSOR LINEARITY Point DAS Difference 1 73.7 N/A 2 31.1 2 3 345. -1 4 31. 1 5 255. -1 6 21.1 7 165. 8 118.7-1 1 73.6 MAX Difference 2 NO ACTION REQUIRED NO ACTION REQUIRED Starting Threshold TORQUE Starting Threshold Torque <= 6. g-cm 5. Torque <= 6. g-cm NO ACTION REQUIRED TORQUE 5. NO ACTION REQUIRED Heater sleeve functional? Yes No N/A NOTES:
SOLAR RADIATION SENSOR VERIFICATION & CALIBRATION ABBR. CANY CLIENT NPS FIELD SPECIALIST M. Slate DATE 12/15/215 SITE NAME Boneyard DATE OF LAST VISIT Network type NPS 6/8/215 Solar Radiation Reference MANUFACTURER MODEL SERIAL NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE LICOR Li-2 PY 82749 8/19/216 MULTIPLIER Serial Number Translator Logger Type ESC Climatonics 157-1 PY 46778 65 High Input (V) 5. Low Input (V). High Output 1396. Low Output. Climatonics 157-1 Serial Number PY 46778 Translator 65 Logger Type High Input (V) 5. ESC Low Input (V). High Output 1396. Low Output. CALIBRATION ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (<=) Difference from CTS (%) 5% Solar Radiation Hour CTS (W/m 2 ) DAS (W/m 2 ) Difference 14 27 22 6.3% 15 137 136 -.7% 16 32 34 6.3% V DARK RESPONSE DAS (W/m 2 ) 1 MEAN ABS % DIFF 4.4% Sensor found clean? Yes No Sensor found level? Yes No Solar Radiation Hour CTS (W/m 2 ) DAS (W/m 2 ) Difference 7 17.7 19 6.9% 8 168.4 167 -.8% 9 329.8 323-2.1% 1 455.5 446-2.1% 11 526.1 516-1.9% MEAN ABS % DIFF 2.8% V DAS (W/m 2 ) DARK RESPONSE 1 NOTES:
PRECIPITATION SENSOR VERIFICATION & CALIBRATION ABBR. CANY CLIENT NPS FIELD SPECIALIST M. Slate DATE 12/15/215 SITE NAME Boneyard DATE OF LAST VISIT 6/8/215 Network type NPS MANUFACTURER MODEL SERIAL NUMBER Precipitation Reference Novalynx drip bottle NA EXPIRATION DATE Serial Number Climatonics 158 NPS 987 Serial Number Climatonics 158 CALIBRATION ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (<=) Difference from Input Volume (%) 5% X Reference Chart Input Volume (ml) Climatronics Climatronics Met One 197-1-G-H 158 37 Diameter (in.) 8 9.66 8 mm/tip.254.1.254 ml/tip 8.24 4.73 8.24 Met One 385 12.254 18.53 RM Young 5222 6.2825.1 2. Texas Electronics TR-525I-HT 6.6.254 4.73 946 DAS target 29.17 2.1 29.17 12.96 47.3 5.84 Conversions Value Units Value 1. inch 25.4 25.4 mm 1. Units mm inch Reference (ml) Target (mm) 946 2.1 Precipitation DAS (mm) Difference 19.2-4.% Heater functional? Yes No N/A Sensor found level? Yes No Sensor found clean? Yes No Precipitation Reference (ml) Target (mm) DAS (mm) Difference 946 NOTES:
CASTNET FLOW SYSTEM VERIFICATION & CALIBRATION ABBR. CANY CLIENT NPS FIELD SPECIALIST M. Slate DATE 12/15/215 SITE NAME Boneyard DATE OF LAST VISIT 6/8/215 Network type NPS MFC High Flow Reference MANUFACTURER MODEL SERIAL NUMBER BIOS Definer 22 12798 EXPIRATION DATE 1/19/216 MFC Serial Number Tylan FC-28 AW94322 MFC Serial Number Tylan FC-28 AW94322 Pump Thomas 17CAB18A Serial Number 7965251 Flow Target 3. ENTER FLOWS IN SLPM Pump Thomas 17CAB18A Serial Number 7965251 MFC Display Linear Regression Date Setpoint Slope Intercept 6/8/215 2.77 1.78.15 MFC VDC Linear Regression Setpoint 2.8 Slope 1.84 Intercept -.7 ESC Logger Scaling High Input (V) Low Input (V) High Output (LPM) Low Output (LPM) 5.. 5.329.55 Operational Checks Vacuum DAS Flow MFC Flow Flow Standard Target 3. 2.8 3. Flow Standard Rotometer MFC Display MFC Volts DC DAS Display Difference Value % Pump Off. SLPM. -.1.17.74 Leak Test. SLPM..1.29.75 1 2. SLPM 1.65 1.9 1.52 1.53 1.667.17 1.% 2 (low) 2.5 SLPM 2.455 2.7 2.25 2.262 2.446 -.9 -.4% 3 (target) 3. SLPM 3.6 3.4 2.8 2.81 3.17.11.4% 4 (high) 3.5 SLPM 3.32 3.7 3. 3.11 3.239 -.81-2.4% 5 4. SLPM 3.668 4. 3.33 3.381 3.611 -.57-1.6% MAX > 4. SLPM 3.824 4.2 3.45 3.492 3.744 -.8-2.1% Leak Test Results Flow (SLPM).2 *Note: A leak is present if the difference between the zero and leak test value is greater than.1 lpm Recalibration Not Required *Note: A calibration is required if the difference between the transfer standard and the DAS value is greater than +/- 2.% at the target setting or greater than +/- 2.5% at either the low or high point NEW CALIBRATION FACTORS MFC Display Linear MFC VDC Linear Regression Regression ESC Logger Scaling Setpoint 2.742 Setpoint 2.763 High Input (V) 5. Slope 1.113 Slope 1.96 Low Input (V). Intercept -.51 Intercept -.29 High Output (LPM) 5.452 Correlation.999 Correlation.999 Low Output (LPM) -.29 Target Flow Standard Rotometer MFC Display MFC Volts DC DAS Display Value % Pump Off. SLPM...19 -.7 Leak Test. SLPM. -.1.17 -.3 1 2. SLPM 2.443 2.7 2.22 2.225 2.41 -.33-1.4% 2 (low) 2.5 SLPM 2.782 3.1 2.52 2.531 2.75 -.32-1.2% 3 (target) 3. SLPM 3.41 3.4 2.76 2.774 3.7 -.34-1.1% 4 (high) 3.5 SLPM 3.365 3.7 3.6 3.68 3.335 -.3 -.9% 5 4. SLPM 3.542 3.9 3.21 3.221 3.59 -.33 -.9% MAX > 4. SLPM 3.87 4.2 3.48 3.463 3.789 -.18 -.5% Leak Test Results Flow (SLPM) -.1 *Note: A leak is present if the difference between the zero and leak test value is greater than.1 lpm Operational Checks Vacuum -19. DAS Flow 3. MFC Flow 2.8 Flow Standard 3. NOTES: Rebuilt pump, cleaned fittings, adjusted scaling, replaced filter. Difference
OZONE ANALYZER VERIFICATION & CALIBRATION () ABBR. CANY CLIENT NPS FIELD SPECIALIST M. Slate DATE 12/15/215 SITE NAME Boneyard DATE OF LAST VISIT 6/8/215 Network type NPS Logger Slope Correction.9928 Logger Intercept Correction.1382 TRANSFER STANDARD AMBIENT ANALYZER STATION REFERENCE Thermo Thermo Thermo 49i 49C 49i DATA ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (<=) Serial Number 11345195 Serial Number 7732-384 Serial Number 1374584 Mean Absolute Difference (%) 1% Coefficient 1. Coefficient 1.28 Coefficient 1. Maximum Absolute Difference (%) 1% Background. Background -2.7 Background. Linearity % of Fullscale 2% Cell A Intensity (Hz) 1264 Cell A Intensity (Hz) 74546 Cell B Intensity (Hz) 13698 Cell B Intensity (Hz) 85521 Cell B Intensity (Hz) 8256 Flow A (lpm).64 Flow A (lpm).623 Flow A (lpm).671 Flow B (lpm).64 Flow B (lpm).687 Flow B (lpm).664 Pressure (mmhg) 69.5 Pressure (mmhg) 62.5 Pressure (mmhg) 618.3 CALIBRATION ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (<=) Mean Absolute Difference (%) 3% Maximum Absolute Difference (%) 3% Linearity % of Fullscale 1% Cell A Intensity (Hz) 76881 SLOPE INT Transfer Standard Correction Factors Full Scale (ppb) 25 Linear Regression Plot 1.53 -.1915 Bench Temp ( C) 27.9 Bench Temp ( C) 34.3 Bench Temp ( C) 31.6 Bench Lamp Temp ( C) 53.8 Bench Lamp Temp ( C) 56.4 Bench Lamp Temp ( C) 53.9 Ozone Lamp Temp ( C) 68.8 Ozone Lamp Temp ( C) 71 Ozone Lamp Temp ( C) NA Ozone Source Yes Ozone Source No Transfer Standard Level LEVEL 2 Transfer Standard Level LEVEL 3 Analyzer DAS (ppb) 5 4 3 2 ZERO -.9 -.7.5 1.2 1 225 42.% 237 235.9 241.7 2 15 35.7% 148.1 147.5 3 1 31.5% 97.9 97.6 99.5 1.9 2.%.2% 4 5 6 26.6% 58.5 58.4 59.2.8 1.4%.3% 58.5.1.2%.3% ZERO.1.3.7.4 N/A.% -.1 -.4 N/A.1% Analog Test Analyzer DAS Zero Full Scale Line Loss Test Span (site tubing) 8 29.5% 79.7 79.5 Analyzer Display 197.5 Span (bypass tubing) 2 O3 LAMP TRANSFER STANDARD AMBIENT ANALYZER STATION REFERENCE POINT TARGET % or mv Display Corrected DAS -.2 25 Reference DAS -.1 25 % P/F -1.3% 151.2 Diff %Diff Linearity % DAS Diff %Diff 5.8 2.4% -.1% 3.7 2.5% 81.5 2. 2.6% N/A -.3% -.1% 15.5.%..7 N/A 239.8 3.9 98.9 1.3 8.1.6 1.6% 1.4%.1%.8%.2% Mean ABS % Diff 2.2% Mean ABS % Diff 1.2% Y-Intercept.36 Y-Intercept -.18 Correlation 1. Correlation 1. Linearity % -.4%.% 3. 2.% -.3% Max ABS % Difference 2.6% Max ABS % Difference 2.% Slope 1.21 Slope 1.17 1 5 1 15y = 1.216x 2 +.3394 25 Transfer Standard (ppb) R² =.9999 Residuals Plot 15 1 Residual (ppb) 5-5 -1-15 1 2 3 Regression Concentration Value (ppb) NOTES:
OZONE ANALYZER VERIFICATION & CALIBRATION () ABBR. CANY CLIENT NPS FIELD SPECIALIST M. Slate DATE 12/15/215 SITE NAME Boneyard DATE OF LAST VISIT 6/8/215 Network type NPS Logger Slope Correction.9966 Logger Intercept Correction.1848 CALIBRATION ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (<=) TRANSFER STANDARD AMBIENT ANALYZER STATION REFERENCE Mean Absolute Difference (%) 3% Thermo Thermo Thermo Maximum Absolute Difference (%) 3% Linearity % of Fullscale 1% 49i 49i 49i DATA ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (<=) Serial Number 11345195 Serial Number 13748586 Serial Number 1374584 Mean Absolute Difference (%) 1% Coefficient 1. Coefficient 1.16 Coefficient 1. Maximum Absolute Difference (%) 1% Background. Background -.2 Background. Linearity % of Fullscale 2% Cell A Intensity (Hz) 11692 Cell A Intensity (Hz) 9193 Cell A Intensity (Hz) 97953 Cell B Intensity (Hz) 13198 Cell B Intensity (Hz) 96482 Cell B Intensity (Hz) 1268 Transfer Standard Correction Factors 1.53 Flow A (lpm).638 Flow A (lpm).77 Flow A (lpm).667 Flow B (lpm).639 Flow B (lpm).72 Flow B (lpm).664 Full Scale (ppb) 25 Pressure (mmhg) 69.2 Pressure (mmhg) 597.7 Pressure (mmhg) 618.9 Linear Regression Plot Bench Temp ( C) 32.3 Bench Temp ( C) 29.3 Bench Temp ( C) 33.5 Bench Lamp Temp ( C) 53.8 Bench Lamp Temp ( C) 53.8 Bench Lamp Temp ( C) 53.9 Ozone Lamp Temp ( C) 68.6 Ozone Lamp Temp ( C) 67.2 Ozone Lamp Temp ( C) NA Ozone Source Yes Ozone Source No Transfer Standard Level LEVEL 2 Transfer Standard Level LEVEL 3 POINT TARGET O3 LAMP TRANSFER STANDARD AMBIENT ANALYZER STATION REFERENCE % or mv Display Corrected DAS Diff %Diff Linearity % DAS Diff %Diff Linearity % ZERO.2.1 -.1 N/A -.3%.3.1 N/A -.1% 1 2 25.5% 22 21.1 21.5.4.2%.% 22.4 1.3.6%.2% 2 15 22.2% 153.2 152.6 152.5 -.1 -.1%.1% 153.8 1.2.8%.% 3 1 18.7% 1.4 1.1 1.8.7.7% -.4% 11.8 1.7 1.7% -.4% 4 8 17.% 77.6 77.4 77.2 -.2 -.2% -.1% 77.6.2.3%.1% 5 6 15.7% 6.4 6.3 59.1-1.2-1.9%.3% 6.5.2.4%.% ZERO.5.7 -.8-1.5 N/A.3% -.3-1. N/A.3% Mean ABS % Diff.6% Mean ABS % Diff.8% Max ABS % Difference 1.9% Max ABS % Difference 1.7% Analog Test Analyzer DAS Reference DAS Slope 1.6 Slope 1.1 Zero -.6 Full Scale 25 -.1 25 Y-Intercept -.8 Y-Intercept -.29 Correlation 1. Correlation 1. 5 4 3 2 1 Residuals Plot Residual (ppb) Analyzer DAS (ppb) 15 1-5 -1 SLOPE INT -.1915 5 1 15 2 25 y =.8655x + 9.3689 Transfer Standard (ppb) R² =.9798 5-15 5 1 15 2 25 Regression Concentration Value (ppb) NOTES: Replaced analyzer with a 49i. Increased lamp setting in 3rd level. Cleaned tubes. Cleaned fan filters.
CALIBRATION AND VERIFICATION STANDARDS ABBR. CANY SITE NAME Network type CLIENT NPS Boneyard NPS FIELD SPECIALIST M. Slate DATE DATE OF LAST VISIT 12/15/215 6/8/215 MANUFACTURER MODEL SERIAL # Calibration Expiration Date Ozone Transfer Standard Thermo 49i 11345195 1/26/216 MFC High Flow Reference BIOS Definer 22 12798 1/19/216 MFC Low Flow Reference Temperature Reference Eutechnics 44 38288 2/23/216 AT/RH Sensor Reference Rotronic Hygroclip 239863 7/13/216 Barometric Pressure Reference Wind Speed Reference (high rpm) RM Young 1882 CA 387 2/26/216 Wind Speed Reference (low rpm) Wind Speed Torque Gauge RM Young 1831 NA Wind Direction Alignment Reference Brunton 56LM 5645265 Wind Direction Linearity Reference RM Young 18212 NA Wind Direction Torque Gauge RM Young 18331 NA Solar Radiation Reference Multiplier W/m2 / mv LICOR Li-2 PY 82749 8/19/216 UV Radiation Reference Multiplier W/m2 / mv Precipitation Reference Volume 946 ml Novalynx drip bottle NA Voltage Measurement Reference Voltage Source PM Flow Standard #1 PM Flow Standard #2 PM Flow Standard #3 PM Flow Standard #4 PM Temperature Standard #1 PM Temperature Standard #2 PM Temperature Standard #3 PM Temperature Standard #4 PM Barometric Pressure Standard #1 PM Barometric Pressure Standard #2 PM Barometric Pressure Standard #3 PM Barometric Pressure Standard #4 TEOM MTV Standard
REPORT OF VERIFICATION U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division Technical Services Branch 19 T.W. Alexander Drive RTP, NC 27711 Primary Standard Guest Information U.S. EPA Agency: EPA RTP Agency: Air Resource Specialists Scott Moore Contact: Scott Moore Contact: Christian Kirk 493 Old Page Rd. Make: NIST Make: Thermo Scientific RTP, NC 2779 : SRP : 49i (919) 541-514 S/N: 1 S/N: 11345195 moore.scott@epa.gov NIST Ver. May 8, 215 Offset: Level 2 Status: m %RSD.17% Slope Intercept R 2 b STDEV.7 Averages: 1.53 -.1915.99999968 Upper Limit: 1.3 3. NA Lower Limit.97-3. NA Date Time Date Time Start Start End End File Slope Intercept R 2 1/16/15 21:31 1/17/15 :16 c1161.xls.9996 -.4139.99999947 DAY 1 1/17/15 :16 1/17/15 3:4 c1162.xls 1.7 -.1518.99999938 DAY 2 1/17/15 3:4 1/17/15 5:55 c1163.xls 1.18 -.2281.99999925 DAY 2 1/17/15 5:55 1/17/15 8:4 c1164.xls 1.23 -.1181.99999974 DAY 2 1/17/15 8:41 1/17/15 11:26 c1165.xls 1.28 -.121.99999962 DAY 2 1/17/15 11:26 1/17/15 14:25 c1166.xls 1.37 -.3369.99999987 DAY 2 1/17/15 14:25 1/17/15 17:24 c1167.xls 1.38 -.1568.99999974 DAY 2 1/17/15 17:24 1/17/15 2:13 c1168.xls 1.37 -.143.99999971 DAY 2 1/17/15 2:13 1/17/15 23:3 c1169.xls 1.38 -.139.99999982 DAY 2 1/17/15 23:4 1/18/15 1:58 c1161.xls 1.45 -.2654.99999979 DAY 2 1/18/15 1:58 1/18/15 4:57 c11611.xls 1.46 -.1784.99999979 DAY 3 1/18/15 4:57 1/18/15 7:45 c11612.xls 1.46 -.193.99999977 DAY 3 1/18/15 7:46 1/18/15 1:38 c11613.xls 1.46 -.1317.99999982 DAY 3 1/18/15 1:38 1/18/15 13:35 c11614.xls 1.5 -.276.9999997 DAY 3 1/18/15 13:35 1/18/15 16:29 c11615.xls 1.48 -.1874.99999969 DAY 3 1/18/15 16:29 1/18/15 19:22 c11616.xls 1.51 -.2545.99999976 DAY 3 1/18/15 19:22 1/18/15 22:1 c11617.xls 1.52 -.237.99999976 DAY 3 1/18/15 22:1 1/19/15 1:2 c11618.xls 1.54 -.2364.99999976 DAY 3 1/19/15 1:2 1/19/15 3:52 c11619.xls 1.55 -.2437.99999985 DAY 4 1/19/15 3:52 1/19/15 6:46 c1162.xls 1.56 -.1664.99999975 DAY 4 1/19/15 6:46 1/19/15 9:39 c11621.xls 1.56 -.1636.99999952 DAY 4 1/19/15 9:39 1/19/15 12:27 c11622.xls 1.58 -.191.99999952 DAY 4 1/19/15 12:27 1/19/15 15:2 c11623.xls 1.57 -.241.99999987 DAY 4 1/19/15 15:21 1/19/15 18:9 c11624.xls 1.56 -.468.99999971 DAY 4 1/19/15 18:9 1/19/15 2:57 c11625.xls 1.55 -.2118.99999975 DAY 4 1/19/15 2:58 1/19/15 23:45 c11626.xls 1.6 -.2489.99999966 DAY 4 1/19/15 23:46 1/2/15 2:4 c11627.xls 1.63 -.2894.99999979 DAY 4 1/2/15 2:4 1/2/15 5:28 c11628.xls 1.6 -.2231.99999974 DAY 5 1/2/15 5:28 1/2/15 8:16 c11629.xls 1.65 -.2737.99999912 DAY 5 1/2/15 8:16 1/2/15 11:5 c1163.xls 1.61 -.1416.99999968 DAY 5 1/2/15 14:55 1/2/15 17:41 c121.xls 1.61 -.1889.99999972 DAY 5 1/2/15 17:41 1/2/15 2:34 c122.xls 1.61 -.1571.99999979 DAY 5 1/2/15 2:34 1/2/15 23:24 c123.xls 1.62 -.163.99999976 DAY 5 1/2/15 23:24 1/21/15 2:17 c124.xls 1.64 -.2187.99999992 DAY 5
1/21/15 2:17 1/21/15 5:13 c125.xls 1.65 -.1579.99999986 DAY 6 1/21/15 5:13 1/21/15 8:5 c126.xls 1.66 -.2384.99999973 DAY 6 1/21/15 8:5 1/21/15 1:58 c127.xls 1.64 -.435.9999996 DAY 6 1/21/15 1:58 1/21/15 13:46 c128.xls 1.68 -.1594.99999974 DAY 6 1/21/15 13:46 1/21/15 16:36 c129.xls 1.69 -.1491.99999982 DAY 6 1/21/15 16:36 1/21/15 19:28 c121.xls 1.69 -.2363.99999972 DAY 6 1/21/15 19:28 1/21/15 22:16 c1211.xls 1.69 -.1783.99999975 DAY 6 1/21/15 22:16 1/22/15 1:6 c1212.xls 1.68 -.67.99999972 DAY 6 1/22/15 1:6 1/22/15 3:55 c1213.xls 1.72 -.1486.99999961 DAY 7 1/22/15 3:55 1/22/15 6:55 c1214.xls 1.72 -.1438.99999893 DAY 7 1/22/15 6:55 1/22/15 9:49 c1215.xls 1.73 -.2894.99999942 DAY 7 Comments: The verification was run for 7 days due to an extended holiday weekend. A total of 45 complete cycles were run, whereas only six (one per day) are required. The Ozone Concentrations were run, on an average, at 959, 883, 89, 735, 663, 59, 515, 438, 364, 31, 231, 152, 74 and 22 ppb with a Zero at the start and at the end of each cycle. The instrument Slope was set at Y = 1.X +. and was not altered. The %RSD of all the Slopes should not exceed 3.7% and the Standard Deviation for all the Intercepts should be less than 1.5. (Transfer Standard for Calibration of Air Monitoring Analyzers for Ozone Technical Assistance Document, October 213, see Table 3 1) The next Re Verification will be due by 1/22/16. Scott A. Moore DATE: January 26, 215