Note: Staff reports can be accessed at

Similar documents
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division

Project Name: MELWOOD HOTEL. Date Accepted: 1/12/04. Waived. Planning Board Action Limit: Plan Acreage: 1.7 Zone: Dwelling Units:

Note: Staff reports can be accessed at Zone: I-3. Tier:

TCPII/193/ Project Name: BELMONT CREST SUBDIVISION. Date Accepted: 03/08/04. Planning Board Action Limit: Waived. Plan Acreage: 62.

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division

Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Conservation Plan

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division

DEPARTURE FROM DESIGN STANDARDS DDS-586

1. Request: The subject application requests the construction of a single-family home in the R-R Zone.

SPECIFIC DESIGN PLAN

R E S O L U T I O N. Single-Family Residence/ Church. 2,488 sq. ft. 2,488 sq. ft. Area Parking Required: Church

1. Request: The subject application is for approval of a gymnasium addition to an existing private school and church.

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George s County Planning Department Development Review Division

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division

Planning Board Action Limit: 2/1/06 Plan Acreage: Location: R-R Southwest of Ritchie Marlboro Road, Dwelling Units: Zone:

WHEREAS, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing on January 14, 2010, the Prince George's County Planning Board finds:

R E S O L U T I O N. 2. Development Data Summary:

WHEREAS, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing on January 27, 2011, the Prince George's County Planning Board finds:

Alternative Compliance

Note: Staff reports can be accessed at Special Permit Application No.

R E S O L U T I O N. Zone(s) C-S-C C-S-C Gas Station (6 fueling positions) with 3 Service Bays & Convenience Store

Project Name: Manokeek, Lot 1, Parcel A. Date Accepted: 2/8/2007 Planning Board Action Limit: Waived. Plan Acreage: 1.24 Zone: Dwelling Units:

R E S O L U T I O N. 2. Development Data Summary:

Note: Staff reports can be accessed at Special Exception Application No. SE Tier:

R E S O L U T I O N. Zone(s) C-M C-M Vehicle Rental, Retail

CITY OF ZEELAND PLANNING COMMISSION

1. Request: This application proposes to construct a 171,069-square-foot building supply store.

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 2010 Legislative Session. Council Members Dernoga and Olson

ARTICLE VI: SITE PLAN REVIEW

ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE TO ADD A NEW SECTION 4.N. IN THE ZONING CODE FOR THE TOWN OF MIDDLETOWN, RELATING TO MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT

Special Exception Departure from Parking and Loading Standards Departure from Design Standards

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND, SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL ORDER AFFIRMING PLANNING BOARD DECISION, WITH AMENDED CONDITIONS

4 January 11, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

Appendix I. Checklists

R E S O L U T I O N. 2. Development Data Summary:

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017

R E S O L U T I O N. Parking requirements per the 2009 Approved Port Towns Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment:

Westwood Shopping Center Sketch Plan, Plan # February 23, 2017 Item # 9

Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan

M E M O R A N D U M. Chair and Members of North West Planning Advisory Committee

SPECIFIC DESIGN PLAN

CHEBOYGAN COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

12 January 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: TAILWIND DEVELOPMENT GROUP,LLC PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

COMMUNITY DESIGN. GOAL: Create livable and attractive communities. Intent

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, :30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

GENERAL INFORMATIONaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

WHEREAS, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing on September 21, 2006, the Prince George's County Planning Board finds:

1. Request Construction of a second phase of the Oak Creek Club development to include 86 single-family residential units.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George s County Planning Department Development Review Division

VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT. Single Family Residential, Townhomes

PLANNING APPROVAL & SIDEWALK WAIVER STAFF REPORT Date: December 1, 2016

WHEREAS, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing on September 11, 2008, the Prince George's County Planning Board finds:

The subject site plan amendment proposes the following revisions to the approved site plan:

General Location Courtyard at LMH Final Development Plan and Final Plat

Request Conditional Rezoning (R-15 Residential to Conditional A-24 Apartment) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

PART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY. The application is Attachment A. The site plan is Attachment B.

PRELIMINARY CONDITIONAL USE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS

ROAD CLOSURE AND LAND USE AMENDMENT SILVER SPRINGS (WARD 1) NORTHEAST OF NOSEHILL DRIVE NW AND SILVER SPRINGS ROAD NW BYLAWS 2C2018 AND 29D2018

STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION CLARKSBURG PREMIUM OUTLETS AT CABIN BRANCH NORTH DISTRICT, PHASE

VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT

ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE ZONED UNINCORPORATED AREAS ARTICLE 1150 OF PUTNAM COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA Page 95 ARTICLE 1150 SITE PLAN REVIEW

SECTION 1 Introduction...1. SECTION 2 Regional Context Criteria for Planning Districts Description of Planning District...

14 October 10, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MPB, INC

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George s County Planning Department Development Review Division

R E S O L U T I O N. Parking Required:

ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 404 MASTER PLANNING

Gadsden County Planning Commission Agenda Request

GRAND COUNTY Planning Commission April 27, :00 P.M. Regular Meeting GRAND CENTER North End Meeting Room 182 No. 500 W.

Request Conditional Use Permit (Automobile Service Station) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Bill Landfair

PART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY. Proposed Land Use: 120 single-family lots. The application is Attachment A. The site plan is Attachment B.

Riverview Road Fort Washington, MD. 163 Waterfront Street, Suite #450 National Harbor, MD (301)

Site Development Plan (SDP) Checklist

Request Conditional Rezoning (R-10 Residential & I-1 Light Industrial to Conditional I-1 Light Industrial) Staff Recommendation Approval

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

PGCPB No File No R E S O L U T I O N

APPENDIX A 6 CONCEPTUAL PRELIMINARY PLAN GUIDE AND CHECKLIST FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS CARRBORO DEVELOPMENT GUIDE APPENDIX A

SPECIFIC PLAN Requirements

Agenda Item. Applicant Logan Virginia Properties, LLC Property Owners Byler Azalea, LLC & Gateway Free Will Baptist Chuch

R E S O L U T I O N. APPROVED PHASE III APPROVED OVERALL Zone(s) M-X-T M-X-T Single-family attached residential Commercial/Retail

R E S O L U T I O N. Zone(s) C-S-C C-S-C. with 2 Service Bays. Parcels 1 1 Square Footage/GFA 2,079 2,580

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form- Based Code. Staff Recommendation Approval

13. PRELIMINARY PLAT NO MILLS FARM - Vicinity of the southeast corner of 159 th Street and Quivira Road

Example Codes. City of Brentwood, Tennessee Brentwood Hillside Protection Overlay District Summary

EXHIBIT B PROJECT NARRATIVE POULSBO MEADOWS

Drexel, Barrell & Co.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM: C STAFF: ROBERT TEGLER FILE NO: CPC PUD QUASI-JUDICIAL

SUBDIVISION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING APPROVAL, REZONING & SIDEWALK WAIVER STAFF REPORT Date: February 7, 2013

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

CITY OF CYPRESS 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California (714) DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PERMIT PROCESS

WHEREAS, the staff of The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission recommended APPROVAL of the application with conditions; and

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

ST. MARY S SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT (SMSCD) AND DPW&T CONCEPT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES AND CHECKLIST

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

STAFF REPORT. April 30, 2018 May 9, 2018

#8) T-1409 CENTENNIAL & LAMB TENTATIVE MAP

Transcription:

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division 301-952-3530 Note: Staff reports can be accessed at www.mncppc.org/pgco/planning/plan.htm. DETAILED SITE PLAN Application Project Name: Our Place Learning Center, LLC Location: Northwest corner of Pennsylvania Avenue and Forestville Road Applicant/Address: Our Place Learning Center, LLC 3300 Marlo Lane Unit E District Heights, Maryland 20747 General Data DSP-05029 Date Accepted: 3/13/2006 Planning Board Action Limit: waived Plan Acreage: 8.75 Zone: I-1 Dwelling Units: NA Square Footage: 7,425 Planning Area: Tier: 75A Council District: 06 Municipality: Developed NA 200-Scale Base Map: 205SE07 Purpose of Application Request for a day care center for children 90 students. Notice Dates Adjoining Property Owners Previous Parties of Record Registered Associations: (CB-12-2003) Sign(s) Posted on Site and Notice of Hearing Mailed: 2/6/2006 5/23/06 Staff Recommendation Staff Reviewer: Lareuse APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS X DISAPPROVAL DISCUSSION

June 15, 2006 MEMORANDUM TO: VIA: FROM: SUBJECT: Prince George s County Planning Board Steve Adams, Urban Design Supervisor Susan Lareuse, Urban Design Section Detailed Site Plan, DSP-05029 Our Place Learning Center, LLC The Urban Design staff has reviewed the detailed site plan for the subject property and presents the following evaluation and findings leading to a recommendation of APPROVAL with conditions as described in the Recommendation section of this report. EVALUATION The detailed site plan was reviewed and evaluated for conformance with the following criteria: a. The requirements of the Zoning Ordinance in the I-1 Zone. b. The requirements of Record Plat WWW 78@75. c. The requirements of the Landscape Manual. d. The requirements of the Prince George s County Woodland Conservation Ordinance. e. Referral comments. FINDINGS Based upon the analysis of the subject application, the Urban Design staff recommends the following findings: 1. Request: To review the proposal for a day care center with a proposed enrollment of 90 children within the Penn-Ville shopping center.

2. Development Data Summary EXISTING PROPOSED Zone I-1 I-1 Use(s) Day Care Day Care Acreage 11.2 11.2 Parcel 3 3 Square Footage 7,425 7,425 OTHER DEVELOPMENT DATA PARKING REQUIRED PROPOSED Showroom (74,496 sq. ft.) Warehouse (112,900 sq. ft.) Retail-low parking generator (23,000 sq. ft.) Day Care center Total Parking 149 73 46 12 280 341 3. Location: The site is in Planning Area 69, Council District 6. More specifically, it is located at the northeast intersection of Pennsylvania Avenue and Forestville Road and directly south of Old Marlboro Pike. 4. Surroundings and Use: The subject property is bounded to the northeast by Old Marlboro Pike, to the east by a self-storage development, to the south by Pennsylvania Avenue and Forestville Road, and to the west by another shopping center. 5. Previous Approvals: The property is the subject of Record Plat WWW 78@75. 6. Design Features: The subject site is accessed from Old Marlboro Pike. The day care center is proposed near the entrance into the site. The play area is proposed directly across the sidewalk from the entrance into the center. COMPLIANCE WITH EVALUATION CRITERIA 7. Zoning Ordinance: The subject application has been reviewed for compliance with the requirements in the I-1 Zone, the site plan design guidelines and the provisions regarding day care establishments of the Zoning Ordinance. a. The subject application is in conformance with the requirements of Section 27-475.02, which governs permitted uses in commercial zones. The proposed day care is a permitted use in the I-1 Zone. b. The proposal is also in conformance with the requirements of Section 27-474, Regulations, regarding additional regulations for development in industrial zones. c. The proposed day care is in conformance with Section 27-475.02 regarding day care centers in industrial areas except as indicated below. Section 27-475.02, day care center for children, states (in part): 2 DSP-05029

(A) An ample outdoor play or activity area shall be provided, in accordance with the following: (i) All outdoor play areas shall have at least seventy-five (75) square feet of play space per child for fifty percent (50%) of the licensed capacity or seventy-five (75) square feet per child for the total number of children to use the play area at one (1) time, whichever is greater; Comment: The plans and photos provided in support of this case indicate an existing play area of 2,032 square feet. A play area of this size will only support 54 students, if only 50 percent of the licensed capacity use the play area at one time. The staff recommends a condition that reduces the proposed enrollment from 90 to 54 students, or that the plans be revised prior to signature approval to enlarge the play area to a minimum of 3,375 square feet of area. (ii) All outdoor play areas shall be located at least twenty-five (25) feet from any dwelling on an adjoining lot, and shall be enclosed by a substantial wall or fence at least four (4) feet in height; Comment: There are no adjacent dwellings on any of the lots and the play area is enclosed with a six-foot high fence. (iii) A greater setback from adjacent properties or uses or a higher fence may be required by the Planning Board if it determines that it is needed to protect the health and safety of the children utilizing the play area; Comment: A greater setback is not necessary from the adjacent property. (iv) An off-premises outdoor play or activity area shall be located in proximity to the day care center and shall be safely accessible without crossing (at grade) any hazardous area, such as a street or driveway; Comment: The play areas are not located off-premises and are located within a safe distance of the center. Crossing of vehicular pathways is not required to access the play area. (v) The play area shall contain sufficient shade during the warmer months to afford protection from the sun; Comment: An existing 18-inch diameter shade tree is shown on the plan within the play area. This tree will provide ample shaded area within the play area. Additional shade area will be provided with a pavilion. (vi) Sufficient lighting shall be provided on the play area if it is used before or after daylight hours to ensure safe operation of the area; and 3 DSP-05029

Comment: The plans indicate the hours of the play area will be limited between 9:00 a.m. and dusk. (vii) Outdoor play shall be limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 9 p.m. Comment: The plans indicate the hours of the play area will be limited between 9:00 a.m. and dusk. With the proposed conditions, the proposal is consistent with the requirements of Section 27-475.02 regarding screening, safety and shade requirements of the play areas. 8. Record Plat WWW 75@78 - The property is the subject of a final plat which was approved on March 23, 1972, for Penn-Ville Center, Parcels A & B. The plat is recorded in land records as WWW 78@75 with no plat notes. Since the applicant is only proposing an outdoor play area and no additions to the existing footprint of the building are proposed, a new preliminary plan of subdivision is not required in accordance with Section 24-111(c) of the Subdivision Regulations. The proposed detailed site plan is in conformance with the record plat. 9. Landscape Manual: The proposed development is subject to the requirements of Section 4.2, Commercial and Industrial Landscaped Strip Requirements, and Section 4.3, Parking Lot Landscape strip. The Permit Review staff reviewed the proposed revised site and landscape plan and found that the submittals are not in compliance with the applicable sections of the Landscape Manual. The plan does not reflect previous permit approvals that demonstrated conformance to the Landscape Manual. Permit 11459-1989 was the last approved permit requiring a 10-foot landscape strip to be provided along Forestville Road and Old Marlboro Pike. The site plan must be revised to demonstrate compliance. A recommended condition below ensures compliance. 10. Woodland Conservation Ordinance: This property is not subject to the provisions of the Prince George s County Woodland Conservation Ordinance because although the gross tract area of the subject property is greater than 40,000 square feet, there are less than 10,000 square feet of existing woodland. A Type I Tree Conservation Plan was not submitted with the review package and is not required. A Standard Letter of Exemption from the Ordinance from the Environmental Planning Section will be required as part of the application for any grading and building permit. Comment: A Standard Letter of Exemption from the Woodland Conservation Ordinance should be obtained from the Environmental Planning Section prior to application of any building or grading permit. 11. Referral Comments: The subject application was referred to the concerned agencies and divisions. The referral comments are summarized as follows: Community Planning Division reviewed the application and in a memorandum dated April 13, 2006, provided the following comments: This application is not inconsistent with the 2002 General Plan Development Pattern policies for the Developed Tier corridors. This application conforms to the land use 4 DSP-05029

recommendations of the 1986 Approved Master Plan and Sectional Map Amendment for Suitland-District Heights and Vicinity, Planning Areas 75A and 75B. The environmental features map shows the entire site in a perceptually sensitive area. Perceptual liabilities are negative features that detract from an area. These include aircraft and highway noise intrusion, air pollution, aircraft accident potential, and negative visual impacts (p.67). The site is within the Andrews Air Force Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ), Accident Potential Zone II (APZ II), and aircraft noise impact zone. Noise Control is recommended on the open space implementation map. Every consideration should be given in the design of the play area to minimize the disturbing influences of the surrounding commercial uses. Specifically, the play area should provide suitable protective buffering and screening; and the orientation of amenities should be away from surrounding commercial uses. The proximity of the Marlow Furniture Showroom and home furnishings and related stores truck routes and parking spaces may create a hazardous situation, with little room to maneuver through the congested areas between the play area and the parking area. Special attention should be given to pedestrian movement and the impact of vehicular traffic on the safety of children in the play area. The application should demonstrate adequate access and internal circulation with respect to the surrounding uses. Comment: The plans indicate a safe movement of the children to the play area. Vehicular and pedestrian access to this site is particularly important to ensure safe and convenient access for walk-in children and for those arriving by bus or other vehicles. Walking distances and various barriers to pedestrian movement and the influence of automobile traffic on the safety of children at the facility should be carefully considered. The application should demonstrate adequate access and internal circulation with respect to the surrounding uses. Comment: The subject site is located in an industrial zone. It is unlikely that walk-in children will be patrons of the site, particularly since there are not any residences in the immediate area. Potential Zone II (APZ II), and aircraft noise impact zone: The noise contour map (pg. 60) shows the site within an area with maximum possible traffic and or aircraft noise levels that exceed 65 decibels (65 dba). Accordingly, page 59 of the master plan states: An average noise level exceeding 65 dba is generally considered to be unacceptable for receptors such as residences, schools, hospitals and the outdoor environment reasonably pleasant for recreation and social activities. Comment: The Environmental Planning Section has reviewed the application for noise issues and a pavilion will be provided to protect the children from overhead noise intrusions when the children are under the pavilion structure. Additionally, the subject property is located in Accident Potential Zone II. This is an area that has a significant aircraft accident potential, according to the 1998 AICUZ study. Although the aircraft accident potential is not so great as to warrant acquisition by the Air 5 DSP-05029

Force (with five percent of the accidents studied), land use planning and controls are strongly encouraged in these areas for the protection of the public. Comment: The current legislation found within the Zoning Ordinance, Part 10B, Airport Compatibility does not address the issue of uses within the AICUZ study area, Accident Potential Zone II for Andrews Air Force Base. No referral has been received by this office for the subject application. Transportation In a memorandum dated March 14, 2006, the Transportation Section stated that there are no trip caps or other conditions that would affect the development of this use. Permits In a memorandum dated March 15, 2006, the Permit Review Section stated the following: a. The parking schedule must be updated. The play area that the day care will now occupy should be deducted from the retail space. The parking required for the day care should be provided with an overall required and provided parking tabulation. b. This applicant has an approved use and occupancy permit for tutoring, before and after care, and a school for self-defense. If any of these activities continue, additional parking may be required. If not, a note should be placed on the site plan. Comment: The application should be amended prior to signature approval if any of the above activities are planned to continue. Environmental Planning The Environmental Planning Section has reviewed the abovereferenced detailed site plan for Our Place Learning Center, DSP-05029, stamped as received by the Countywide Planning Division on June 5, 2006. The plans as submitted have been found to require additional information and/or revisions. Complete comments cannot be provided until revised plans and the requested information have been submitted. The Environmental Planning Section reserves the right to make additional comments once the required information has been submitted. Background The Environmental Planning Section has no record of any previous applications for the subject property. This application seeks the approval of a detailed site plan for a day care facility to be established within an existing structure, on a parcel totaling 8.75 acre, in the I-1 Zone. Site Description The subject property is located on the south side of Marlboro Pike west of Forestville Road on Marlo Lane, approximate 400 feet east of Forestville Road. The site is relatively flat and characterized with terrain sloping toward the southwest portion of the site and drains into unnamed tributaries of Henson Creek watershed in the Potomac River Basin. The predominant soil types found to occur on the site according to the Prince George s County Soils Survey are Beltsville, Sassafras and Croom. These soils generally exhibit slight to moderate limitations to development due to perched water table, impeded drainage and steep slopes. Based on information obtained from the Maryland Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage Program publication entitled Ecologically Significant Areas in Anne Arundel and Prince George s Counties, December 1997, there are no rare, threatened or endangered species found to 6 DSP-05029

occur in the vicinity of this site. There are no floodplains, streams, Waters of the US, or wetlands associated with the site. There are no Marlboro clays or scenic or historic roads located on or adjacent to the subject property. The site is located in close proximity to major noise generators including Andrews Air Force Base operations. However, the severity of noise impact is reduced due to the I-1 zoning designation. Forestville Road and Marlboro Pike Road are both countymaintained collectors and generally not regulated for noise impacts. This property is in the Developed Tier as delineated on the approved 2002 General Plan. Environmental Review Based on the most recent Air Installation Compatible Use Zone Study released to the public in August 1998 by the Andrews Air Force Base, aircraft-related noise is significant on this property. The study indicates that the noise levels on this site are between 75 and 80 dba Ldn. These noise levels are above the state noise standards for residential-type uses (65 dba Ldn). Although the use of a child care center in the I-1 Zone is allowed, attention should be given to the frequent high levels of aircraft noise. The building materials for the existing structure are likely sufficient to reduce interior noise levels to acceptable levels. Outdoor activity areas must be shielded from aircraft noise through the provision of a structure with a solid roof at least 10 feet by 10 feet in size. The revised plan shows a structure in the play area with a solid roof that addresses this concern. Forestville Road is a county-maintained collector roadway. Due to the distance between the roadway and the outdoor play area, the noise from the roadway will not impact the platy area. No further information is required with regard to noise mitigation. Urban Design The pavilion, proposed as a 10 by 10-foot structure, should be enlarged to a 10 by 12-foot structure in order to allow for the placement of a typical eight-foot-long handicapaccessible picnic table. The plan should be revised prior to signature approval to allow for sufficient room to maneuver and place a wheel chair at the end of the table. Department of Environmental Resources (DER) Stated that they had no objection to the proposed plan. Maryland Department of Human Resources At the time of this writing, staff has not received comment from the Maryland Department of Human Resources. District Heights and Morningside At the time of this writing, these municipalities have not offered comment on the proposed project. 12. As required by Section 27-285(b) of the Zoning Ordinance, the detailed site plan represents a reasonable alternative for satisfying the site design guidelines of Subtitle 27, Part 3, Division 9 of the Prince George s County Code without requiring unreasonable cost and without detracting substantially from the utility of the proposed development for its intended use. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the foregoing evaluation and analysis, the Urban Design staff recommends that the Planning Board adopt the findings of this report and APPROVE Detailed Site Plan DSP-05029, subject to the following conditions: 7 DSP-05029

1. Prior to signature approval of the proposed detailed site plan, the following revisions shall be made to the plans or required items shall be submitted: a. The plans shall be revised to either reduce the enrollment from 90 to 54 students or the plans shall be revised to enlarge the play area to a minimum of 3, 375 square feet. b. The plans shall be revised to indicate conformance to Sections 4.2 and 4.3 of the Landscape Manual. c. The general notes and parking schedule should be amended to include any additional activities, such as tutoring, before and after care, and/or a school for self-defense. d. The plans shall be revised to delineate conveniently located parking spaces to be used by the patrons of the day care center. The spaces shall be clearly marked in the field for use by the patrons of the day care center. e. A note shall be added to the plans indicating that no more than 50 percent of the children can use the play area at any one time. f. The pavilion shall be increased in size from 10 by 10 to 10 by 12 feet. 8 DSP-05029