THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK BYLAW NO A bylaw to adopt Amendment No. 6 to the Official Plan for The Regional Municipality of York

Similar documents
1 STATUTORY PUBLIC MEETING INFORMATION REPORT PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO 6 TO THE YORK REGION OFFICIAL PLAN, 2010 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES

Chapter 6 cultural heritage

TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND CONSERVATION PLANS GUIDE

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK BY-LAW NO. OP

MONITORING STRATEGY. CRM Lab Archaeological Services

Municipal Obligations Archaeological Heritage Screening. Heritage Conservation Branch Ministry of Parks, Culture and Sport November 14, 2018

CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES POLICIES

a) buildings, structures and artifacts of historical significance;

STAGE 1 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF YONGE STREET SUBWAY EXTENSION, LOTS 37-41, CONCESSION EYS, TOWNSHIP OF MARKHAM, CITY OF TORONTO, YORK COUNTY

Purpose of Report...1. Planning Framework Provincial Policy Statement Draft PPS...2. Ontario Heritage Act...3

High Speed Rail (London- West Midlands)

Foreword. Síle de Valera, TD, Minister for Arts, Heritage, Gaeltacht and the Islands

A Guide to Cultural Heritage Resources in the Land Use Planning Process. Review Draft (65 Pages) October 2017 Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport

THE CITY OF VAUGHAN BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER

Archaeology and Planning in Greater London. A Charter for the Greater London Archaeology Advisory Service

Planning Justification Brief

Revised License Report

TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM STRATEGY APPENDIX F: MODEL POLICIES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TARGET TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL BY-LAW NUMBER

Cultural Heritage Resources

COUNTY OF LAMBTON OFFICIAL PLAN UPDATE BACKGROUND REPORT NO.

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF OAKVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER

Town of Cobourg Heritage Master Plan. Statutory Public Meeting

Environmental Assessment for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre

1 Introduction. Chapter. In this chapter:

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WINDSOR Office of the City Solicitor Planning Department

Planning and Growth Management Committee Item No. as adopted by City Council at its meeting of. CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No

TOWN OF AURORA ARCHITECTURAL SALVAGE PROGRAM GUIDE

Official Plan Amendment to Further Protect Heritage Views of City Hall, Old City Hall and St. James Cathedral - Preliminary Report

HERITAGE WESTERN CAPE. 10 June 2015 Version 13 for Comment

The protection of the agricultural resources of the Province;

9 CITY OF VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO BOCA EAST INVESTMENTS LIMITED

Peel Region. Greenbelt Plan Conformity. Plan Review. Background & Approach

Detritus Consulting Ltd.

Ontario Heritage Trust. Strategic Plan

HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES POLICIES

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 2010 Legislative Session. Council Members Dernoga and Olson

The Regional Municipality of Halton. Chair and Members of the Planning and Public Works Committee

APPENDIX G. Historical Resources Overview Documentation

Stock-Taking on Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in the Black Sea IMPLEMENTATION AUDIT QUESTIONNAIRE 2010

TABLE OF CONTENTS HISTORIC PRESERVATION ELEMENT I. INTRODUCTION HP. A. Purpose HP B. Assessment and Conclusions...

A Technical Guideline for Cultural Heritage Resources. for Projects Planned Under the

AMENDMENT NO. 41 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN FOR THE TOWN OF MONO

FORMER CANADIAN FORCES BASE (CFB) ROCKCLIFFE SECONDARY PLAN. Official Plan Amendment XX to the Official Plan for the City of Ottawa

Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment

MEMORANDUM. Date: January 16, Planning & Development Committee. From: Michael Di Lullo, City Clerk

COBOURG Cobourg Heritage Advisory Committee. Alison Torrie Lapaire Planner I - Heritage

CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No To adopt a new City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 470, Fire Safety Boxes.

Summary of Other State Archeological Guidelines

Memorials, Plaques & Interpretive Signs Policy

April 4, 2013 Rana Ahmadi San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency 1 South Van Ness Avenue, 7th Floor San Francisco, CA 94103

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 6, 2014

Municipal Heritage Bridges Cultural, Heritage and Archaeological Resources Assessment Checklist Revised April 11, 2014

SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:

Town of Whitby By-law #

1.0 PLANNING MARKHAM S FUTURE CONTENTS

NEW YORK CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT. Notice of Public Hearing and Opportunity to Comment on Proposed Rule

Original License Report. Submitted to: New Horizon Development Inc. 69 John Street South, Suite 304 Hamilton, Ontario L8N 2B9 Phone (905)

ORDINANCE NO

Russell Avenue-Range Road

Planning Department. Director of Planning. Manager of Planning. Planning Technician/ Sustainability Coordinator. Planner II/ Heritage Coordinator

City of Kingston Heritage Commemoration Program Guidelines: 7 May 2010

Subject: Identification and Confirmation Procedure for Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest Compiled by Branch Ontario Parks

Slope Stability Management Framework

Public Notice of Amendment to New Shoreham General Ordinances Chapter 5 Fire Prevention and Protection New Article IV Fire Alarm Ordinance

Director, Community Planning, North York District

Heritage Action Zone. Explanatory Notes and Guidance

Fire Sprinklers Working Group Final Report

Fostering Indigenous Relationships Within Canada - How Far We Have Come: A View from Walpole Island First Nation

District of Sicamous. Fire Department Bylaw No. 126, Effective Date February 26, 1996

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

Policy Discussion Paper CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES

PROJECT INFORMATION. The type of development

VANCOUVER ISLAND HIGHWAY AGREEMENT

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION. Environmental Guide for Built Heritage and Cultural Heritage Landscapes

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

Report to Council. Date: December 15, 2014 Jeff Watson, Policy Planner

Cultural Landscape Heritage Impact Statement Terms of Reference

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

1407 Military Trail Zoning Amendment Application Final Report

Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Land at Kent Cottage, 19 Chapel Street, Hythe, Kent

Summary of Heritage Input

CHAPTER The title of P.L.1983, c.337 is amended to read as follows:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Preparation of National Register of Historic Places. Nominations for the following:

L 2-1 HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION. Cheyne Family Cemetery. Main Street South

~!VAUGHAN NOV Z November 21, Mr. Denis Kelly, Regional Clerk The Regional Municipality of York Yonge Street Newmarket, ON L3Y 6Z1

Cultural Heritage Landscapes Strategy

European code of good practice: "ARCHAEOLOGY AND THE URBAN PROJECT"

Chapter 8: Cultural Heritage Assessment

Stage 2: WestConnex M5 King Georges Road Interchange Upgrade. Appendix B5 Construction Heritage Management Plan

2.1.8 Cultural Resources Regulatory Setting. Affected Environment, Environmental

6 AMENDMENT NO. 637 TO THE VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN (VAUGHAN 400 NORTH EMPLOYMENT AREA SECONDARY PLAN)

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 15, 2016

LU Encourage schools, institutions, and other community facilities that serve rural residents to locate in neighboring cities and towns.

ORDINANCE NO

OTC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP

CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS ORDINANCE NO. 12, 2002

Florida Senate SB 982 By Senator Bennett

6 Growth Management Challenges and Opportunities

Transcription:

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK BILL NO. 13 BYLAW NO. 2014-13 A bylaw to adopt Amendment No. 6 to the Official Plan for The Regional Municipality of York WHEREAS the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.p.13, as amended, permits The Regional Municipality of York to adopt an Official Plan or amendments thereto; AND WHEREAS Regional Council at its meeting on February 20, 2014 decided to adopt Regional Official Plan Amendment No. 6 to the York Region Official Plan 2010; The Council of The Regional Municipality of York HEREBY ENACTS as follows: 1. Regional Official Plan Amendment No. 6 to the York Region Official Plan 2010 (ROPA No. 6) consisting of text and figures in the attached Schedule A is hereby adopted. 2. ROPA No. 6, by virtue of Ontario Regulation 525/97, is exempt from approval by the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing. 3. Schedule A shall form part of this Bylaw. ENACTED AND PASSED on February 20, 2014. Denis Kelly Regional Clerk Bill Fisch Regional Chair Authorized by Clause 3, Report 3, of the Committee of the Whole, adopted by Regional Council at its meeting on February 20, 2014. 5382560

Schedule A Proposed Amendment 6 to the Official Plan for the Regional Municipality of York

AMENDMENT 6 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN FOR THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK PART A - THE PREAMBLE 1. Purpose of the Amendment: This amendment establishes specific policies to ensure the responsible management of archaeological resources, as required by Provincial policy and legislation. 2. Location: This amendment applies throughout the Regional Municipality of York. 3. Basis: The Ontario Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990 identifies conservation of features of significant archaeological interest as areas of provincial interest, and requires that decisions of municipal Councils and Boards and the Ontario Municipal Board be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement. The PPS 2005 cultural heritage and archaeology policies, the Ontario Heritage Act, and other legislation, govern the handling of archaeological resources, areas of archaeological potential and burial sites. The PPS 2005 requires that significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved, and that significant archaeological resources must be conserved prior to development and site alteration being permitted on lands containing archaeological resources or areas of archaeological potential. It also requires that where significant archaeological resources are preserved on site, the heritage integrity of the site must be maintained through any development or site alteration. The Regional Municipality of York (York Region) recognizes the importance of protecting archaeological resources, which contribute to an understanding of the Region s heritage, identity and sense of place. These fragile, non-renewable resources have been lost at an ever-increasing rate in southern Ontario for the past 60 years, as a result of extensive land development. Existing policies within the ROP 2010 demonstrate York Region s commitment to responsible archaeological management practices, continued dialogue with First Nations and Metis Nation representatives, and the investigation of appropriate reinterment, interpretive and commemoration strategies.

Updated policies which reflect changing provincial directions, local Official Plans, and the outcome of the Archaeological Management Plan Study are needed. This will ensure archaeological assessments are carried out at the appropriate stage or stages of the development review process so that archaeological resources can be protected in the same way that natural heritage resources are currently identified and protected through the development process. The Policies are intended to clarify the responsibilities and processes involved in archaeological management in York Region, and to create a consistent process across the local municipalities. PART B - THE AMENDMENT All of the Amendment entitled PART B - THE AMENDMENT, consisting of the following Policies, constitutes Amendment 6 to the Official Plan for the Region of York. 1. That Chapter 3 Healthy Communities, Section 3.4 Cultural Heritage is hereby amended by deletion of Policies 3.4.10, 3.4.11 and 3.4.12, and renumbering of subsequent policies 3.4.13 and 3.4.14 to 3.4.10 and 3.4.11. 2. That the following section and policies be added following policy 3.4.11 (formerly policy 3.4.14): Archaeological Resources First Nations, Métis and European archaeological resources contribute to York Region s unique, local identity. They include sites that may contain scatters of artifacts, the remains of structures, cultural deposits or subsurface strata of human origin. Archaeological sites are both highly fragile and non-renewable. This Plan recognizes the importance of conserving archaeological resources and the potential to commemorate significant archaeological discoveries in recognition of their contribution to the municipality s unique community identity. Objective To ensure conservation of archaeological resources occurs in situ or in an alternate location by proper excavation, documentation and preservation of recovered cultural materials and site documentation, to the satisfaction of the local municipality in compliance with Provincial requirements, standards or guidelines. It is the Policy of Council: 12. To require local municipal official plans to contain policies dealing with archaeological resources that require their identification, appropriate documentation and/or protection in accordance with the following:

a. that upon receiving information that land proposed for development may include archaeological resources or contain an area of archaeological potential, the proponent of the development shall undertake studies by a provincially licensed archaeologist to: i) Complete the applicable level of archaeological assessment of the land in compliance with current Provincial requirements, standards and guidelines for consultant archaeologists; ii) Assess the impact of the proposed development on any archaeological resources identified. b. That First Nation or Métis significant archaeological resources shall be considered resources that are preferably to be protected in place unless it is demonstrated that preservation in situ is not reasonable in the circumstances. The consultant archaeologist shall engage those First Nations or Métis with the closest cultural affiliation and in whose traditional territories the significant archaeological resource is situated to identify commemorative approaches to assist in maintaining the heritage integrity of the site. c. That where archaeological resources are documented during a Stage 2 archaeological assessment and found to be First Nations or Métis in origin, the proponent is encouraged, through their consultant archaeologist, to ensure that those First Nations or Métis with the closest cultural affiliation and in whose traditional territories the archaeological resources were found receive a copy of the Stage 2 archaeological assessment report prior to the development proceeding. d. That where First Nations or Métis significant archaeological resources are identified during a Stage 2 archaeological assessment, and preservation in their current location is not possible, the proponent should engage with the First Nations or Métis with the closest cultural affiliation and in whose traditional territories the significant archaeological resource is situated to address their interest in the resource and define interpretive and commemorative opportunities related to the resource. e. The proponent is encouraged, through their consultant archaeologist, to ensure that where a Stage 3 archaeological assessment of such an archaeological resource is being undertaken to define the nature and extent of the Resource, those First Nations or Métis with the closest cultural affiliation and in whose traditional territories the archaeological resource is located, be notified in advance of onsite assessment work. f. The proponent shall provide the municipality with a copy of the Provincial letters confirming that the reports have been filed into the Provincial Register. g. That where significant archaeological resources are preserved in situ the area subject to on-site preservation shall be excluded from the land development and the municipality shall consider regulatory tools such as zoning restrictions, designation and heritage easements or open space land dedications to protect the resources;

h. Where human burial sites are encountered during any land-disturbing activity, all work must immediately cease and the site be secured, in accordance with legislated requirements. The appropriate provincial and municipal authorities must be notified and the required provisions under the Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act, 2002, along with other applicable protocol or policy must be followed. 13. That local municipalities encourage the communication of appropriate archaeological discoveries and/or cultural narratives to residents in development proposals through innovative architectural and/or landscape architectural design, public art, or other public realm projects. 14. To encourage local municipalities, with the advice of a provincially licensed archaeologist and the Province, to develop a contingency plan for the protection of archaeological resources in urgent situations, this may include a funding resource to be accessed in emergency situations to protect archaeological resources that are discovered by chance or are under imminent threat. 15. That should previously undocumented archaeological resources be discovered during undertaking of Regional public works, including but not limited to the construction of streets and ancillary structures, sewer and water mains and associated structures, they may be an archaeological site and therefore subject to Section 48 (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The proponent or person discovering the archaeological resources must cease alteration of the site immediately and engage a licensed consultant archaeologist to carry out archaeological fieldwork in compliance with Section 48 (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act. 16. To investigate the potential for a secure re-interment site for human remains where preservation in their current location is not possible and an interpretation centre for First Nations and the Métis artifacts recovered from archaeological investigations in the Region. 17. To review in partnership with First Nations, the Métis Nation and other stakeholders, the Archeological Management Plan on the same review schedule as this Plan to ensure that archaeological resources information is kept up-to date. 18. To develop in conjunction with First Nations and Métis having traditional territories in or an interest in the cultural heritage of York Region, local municipalities, and the Province, a First Nations and Métis Consultation Tool. 19. That the York Region Archaeological Management Plan and Archaeological Potential Map provide guidance on addressing the policies of this Section. New development and site alteration shall meet all items required by this Plan, and shall strive to achieve all items encouraged in this Plan. 3. That the DEFINITIONS section is hereby amended by the addition of the following:

archaeological assessment A survey undertaken by a provincially licensed archaeologist to identify an archeological site and, to the extent required, the cultural heritage value or interest of the site and applicable mitigation measures. There are four levels of archeological assessment that are specific to the circumstances, a Stage 1, Stage 2, Stage 3 or Stage 4 archaeological assessment, each of which as required is completed by a provincially licensed archaeologist in accordance with the current Provincial requirements, standards and guidelines applicable to provincially licensed archaeologists. archaeological fieldwork Any activity carried out on, above or under land or water for the purpose of obtaining and documenting data, recovering artifacts and remains or altering an archaeological site and includes monitoring, assessing, exploring, surveying, recovering and excavating. archaeological resources Includes artifacts, archaeological sites and marine archaeological sites. The identification and evaluation of such resources are based upon archaeological fieldwork undertaken in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act. archaeological site Any property that contains an artifact or any other physical evidence of past human use or activity that is of cultural heritage value or interest. artifact Any object, material or substance that is made, modified, used, deposited or affected by human action and is of cultural heritage value or interest. in situ In situ means remaining in place in the original location where something was found. marine archaeological site An archeological site that is fully or partially submerged or that lies below or partially below the high-water mark of any body of water. significant archaeological resources Resources that, in the opinion of a licensed archaeologist (and confirmed by the Province through acceptance of the archaeological assessment report into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports) meet the criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest set out in the Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists, as amended, and are to be protected from impacts of any sort. traditional territories The geographic area traditionally occupied or used regularly by a First Nation and/or their ancestors.