A guide to preparing the land use element of a local comprehensive plan. Land Use. Resource guide

Similar documents
Chapter 10 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS

2010 Plan of Conservation and Development

Town of Janesville Comprehensive Plan-2035

Branch Avenue Corridor

Preliminary Port Towns Sector Plan and Proposed Sectional Map Amendment March 2009

Preparing New Hampshire for Projected Storm Surge, Sea-Level Rise, and Extreme Precipitation

Land Use. Chapter 8: Introduction. Land Use Vision. Section I: Current Land Use 8-1

Open House Schedule min to Visit Stations, Ask Questions and Contribute Your Thoughts min Presentation

GUIDEBOOK ON LOCAL PLANNING FOR HEALTHY COMMUNITIES (2014)

Receive recommendations from representatives of the Future Land Use Plan Advisory Committee regarding their review of the Land Use Element of the

LOS ANGELES CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

General Plans. Tom Dansie, AICP Steve Pastorik, AICP

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

Subregion I. Proposed Sectional Map Amendment, August Preliminary Master Plan and

Subject: City of Richfield Cedar Avenue Corridor Plan Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Review File No

HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN

PDS June 1, 2016 Page 1. Planning and Development Committee. MEETING DATE: Wednesday, June 01, 2016

Ottawa County Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan. February, 2006

What Planners Do. Heather Wade, Coastal Planning Specialist Texas Sea Grant

IC Chapter Severe Weather Warning Sirens

Westport Master Plan. Town of Westport. Master Plan Master Plan Update Committee. Westport, Massachusetts

Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE

Division F Of G Of The 1987 Standard Industrial Classification Manual

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Transportation Chapter 1 - Introduction and Purpose of Planning to 1-3. Utilities

City Center Specific Plan Amendments And Background Report City of Richmond. PLANNING COMMISION FINAL DRAFT January, 2001

HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT: Planning and Programming Division: An Inventory of Its Transportation Planning Studies

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

THE NATIONAL CODE SERVICES ASSOCIATION (NCSA)

Chapter 7 LAND USE ELEMENT

BRAMPTON FLOWERTOWN SECONDARY PLAN Area 6

VILLAGE OF BOLTON HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

Table IX-1 LAND USES IN WASHINGTON COUNTY: 2006

Snohomish County Planning and Development Services

The Town of Hortonia shares borders with: the Town of Ellington, Town of Greenville, Town of Dale, New London, Hortonville and Waupaca County.

WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 2. Michael Grochala, Community Development Director

Presentation Item C Annotated Model Outline for a Framework for a Green Infrastructure Plan

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

May U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

Blackfriars/Petersville Heritage Conservation District Study

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2009 Phase 2 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Designation Process: Step One

DOCKET & STATUS UPDATE

Strategies to Connect and Integrate Urban Planning and Environmental Planning Through Focusing On Sustainability : Case Study of Cheongju City, Korea.

Summary of Action Strategies

Outdoor Recreation and Conservation Careers Toolkit WEBINAR: OUTDOOR RECREATION AND CONSERVATION CAREERS TOOLKIT 1

Youth in Governance st Street West Altoona, WI (FAX) WHY YOUTH IN GOVERNANCE? PURPOSE

2900 Steeles Avenue East at Don Mills Road in the Town of Markham

ATTACHMENT A. Town of Lebanon Village Center Study Proposal Cover Sheet (to be included with Proposal) Contract shall not exceed $48,500.

DANE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 5-YEAR UPDATE. Madison Area Surveyors March 12, 2014 Resource Protection Corridors

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT

Rhode Island Shoreline Change Special Area Management Plan

The protection of the agricultural resources of the Province;

VILLAGE OF WESTON, 5500 Schofield Ave, Weston WI RESOLUTION OF THE PLAN COMMISSION

ADOPTION OF THE REVISED OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN

Westmoreland County Greenways Plan

Washington State s Growth Management Act

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

Arlington County Retail Plan

I. INTRODUCTION. Project Background and Study Area

St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Focused Area - Official Plan Amendment Status Report

Acknowledgments. City of East Peoria. City of Washington. Aldermen. Commissioners. Staff. Staff. Planning Consultant. David Mingus, Mayor

KALAMAZOO METROPOLITAN COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (KMCPC)

TASK FORCE MEETING #10 SUMMARY

MORAGA HILLSIDES AND RIDGELINES PROJECT

Plan Overview. Manhattan Area 2035 Reflections and Progress. Chapter 1: Introduction. Background

Laberge Group. Town of Coeymans. Draft Comprehensive Plan. Overview of Planning Process

Chapter 14: Community Services and Public Utilities

Institutional Master Plan The Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University

Source: Albemarle County Community Development 2010

TOWN OF BRUDERHEIM Report to the capital region board

Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council (G/FLRPC) February Webinar Series. Regional Planning Councils. G/FLRPC - February 10, 2016, 12:00-1:00

CAO Update Status Work continues on products: Draft ordinance BAS report CAO process summary (2002 to present) Comprehensive e Plan policy review Some

Goal 14 Urbanization

North Salt Lake General Plan Update 2013

The South Macleod Trail Community and Employment Centre

The Floyds Fork Area Study A Framework for Growth

Cumberland Comprehensive Plan Town Council adopted August 2003, State adopted June 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Implementation Vision

FOR COUNTY LAND USE PLANNING: COLORADO PRICE $1.00. Cooperative Extension Service Colorado State University

Urban Planning and Land Use

LU Encourage schools, institutions, and other community facilities that serve rural residents to locate in neighboring cities and towns.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A COMPREHENSIVEC PLAN CITY : 2035 FOR THE OF KENOSHA: 2035 COMPREHENSIVE ADOPTED 19, 2010 ORDINANCE BY THE COMMON

Rural Land Use Designations Kittitas County December 6, 2007 Draft

Riparian Buffer on the Bushkill Creek. Policies

Full Plan Document. Adopted October 4, 2011

Urbanization in Developing Countries

Cooperative Extension s Role in Land Use Planning and Conservation. Sabrina Drill UCCE- Los Angeles/Ventura Integrated Hardwood Range Mgmt.

South Central Connecticut Region Plan of Conservation & Development 2018 Update. Municipal Planners

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE

Request for Proposals A Revised Master Plan for Waterfront Planning Area, City of Lynn

A New Plan For The Calgary Region June calgary.ca call 3-1-1

Preserving Recreational & Commercial Working Waterfronts. Jennifer Z. Carver, AICP August 2007

THE SMOKING-MATERIAL FIRE PROBLEM

Niagara Region Official Plan. Table of Contents

R:\PPMENOTES2002\PPME NOTES TOC.DOC September 6, Physical Planning and Municipal Engineering

REVISION RECORD FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SUPPLEMENT

J,1. Newmarket INFORMATION REPORT DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES/PLANNING &BUILDING SERVICES PLANNING REPORT Purpose of this Report

Transcription:

Chapter 0 A guide to preparing the land use element of a local comprehensive plan Title Land Use Resource guide A strong economy, a healthy environment, and an enjoyable quality of life all depend on the land. -Diamond and Noonan

Land Use Resource guide A guide to preparing the land use element of a local comprehensive plan Great things are not done by impulse, but by a series of small things brought together. -Vincent van Gogh June 2005

Acknowledgements Land Use Resource Guide Team Team Members: Primary Authors: Anna Haines, Ph.D. (Chair), Director, Center for Land Use Education, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point/Extension Kassandra Walbrun, Programming and Planning Analyst, Department of Transportation Sarah Kemp, Associate Researcher, Applied Population Lab, University of Wisconsin- Madison Mark Roffers, Principal Planner, Vandewalle & Associates Lance Gurney, Planning Director, Sauk County Mel Erickson, Planning Director, Eau Claire County Lynn Markham, Land Use Specialist, Center for Land Use Education, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point/Extension Rebecca Roberts, Land Use Specialist, Center for Land Use Education, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point/Extension Chin-Chun Tang, Project Planner, Center for Land Use Education, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point/Extension/Global Environmental Management Education Center Reviewers: Brian Ohm, Associate Professor, University of Wisconsin-Extension & Department of Urban & Regional Planning, University of Wisconsin-Madison Dennis Lawrence, AICP, Executive Director, North Central Wisconsin Regional Plannning Commission Amy Knox, Project Manager, Southwestern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission Amy Emery, Principal Planner, OMNNI Associates Douglas Miskowiak, Project Planner, Center for Land Use Education, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point/Extension/Global Environmental Management Education Center ii Players: Sally Kefer, Land Use Team Leader, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Kevin Pomeroy, Planning Director, 1000 Friends of Wisconsin Erich Schmidtke, Planning Analyst, Municipal Services Team, Wisconsin Department of Administration George Hall, Advanced Analyst, Municipal Services Team, Wisconsin Department of Administration Greg Landretti, Director, Bureau of Assessment Practices, Wisconsin Department of Revenue Paul Benjamin, Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection Richard Bernstein, Smart Growth Coordinator, Wisconsin Historical Society Bruce Brown, Geologist, Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey

David Hart, GIS Outreach Specialist, University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute Thomas Larson, Director of Regulatory and Legislative Affairs,Wisconsin Realtors Association Tom Wilson, Town Administrator, Town of Westport 2005, Center for Land Use Education, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point/Extension iii

iv

Table of Contents Wisconsin s Comprehensive Planning Law in Briefv iii Chapter 1 Introduction and Overview 1 Introduction 1 Purpose of the Guide 2 Land Use Trends 3 Definition and Purpose of Planning for Land Use 4 Challenges to Planning for Land Use 6 Chapter The Land Use Element within the Comprehensive Planning Process 9 Introduction 9 The Land Use Element: Framework and Requirements 10 Using the Land Use Element to Integrate Elements 14 Developing Consistency Between Plan Elements 14 Designing a Public Participation Plan 15 Chapter 3 Conducting a Land Use Inventory 19 Introduction 19 Determining Current Land Use Conditions 19 Preparing a Base Map 20 Deciding on Land Use Categories 21 Collecting Current Land Use Data 22 Preparing the Current Land Use Map 22

Table of Contents Chapter 4 Land Use Analysis 25 Introduction 25 Overview of Analysis Techniques 26 Description of Eleven Analysis Techniques 26 Completing the Analysis 38 Chapter 5 Creating Land Use Goals, Objectives, Policies and Programs 39 Introduction 39 Defining Goals, Objectives, Policies and Programs 40 Involving the Public to Build Consensus 41 Writing Land Use Goals, Objectives, Policies and Programs 42 Integrating the Goals of Other Elements 45 Implementing Goals and Objectives 45 Chapter 6 Land Use Alternatives or Scenarios 47 Introduction 47 Definition of Land Use Alternatives or Scenarios 48 Purpose of Creating Alternatives 48 Guiding Principles 48 Scenario Building 49 Public Involvement 49 Chapter 7 Preparing a Future Land Use Map 59 Introduction 59 Future Land Use Map: A Definition 60 Producing a Future Land Use Map 60 Designating Smart Growth Areas 61 Examples of Future Land Use Maps 62 Chapter 8 Implementation Tools 65 Introduction 65 Roles and Responsibilities for Plan Implementation 66 Types of Implementation Tools 67 Developing a Strategy 71 Checking for Consistency 73 Chapter 9 Monitoring and Future Updates and Revisions 75 The Importance of Monitoring Progress 75 Techniques to Monitor Your Plan 76 Updating the Land Use Plan 76 vi

Table of Contents Appendix A Land Use Planning Principles 79 Appendix B An Example of a Land Use Element 83 Appendix C Land-Based Classification Standards Color Codes for Activity and Function 117 Appendix D Land Use Resources 121 Index 123 vii

Wisconsin s Comprehensive Planning Law in Brief Wisconsin s comprehensive planning law (Wisconsin Statute Section 66.1001), passed under the 1999 Budget Act, requires that by January 1, 2010, zoning, subdivision and official map ordinances of a community be consistent with an adopted local comprehensive plan. The law defines a comprehensive plan to: Include at least nine elements (issues and opportunities; housing; economic development; transportation; utilities and community facilities; agricultural, natural and cultural resources; land use; intergovernmental cooperation; and implementation) Include public participation throughout the planning process. Be adopted in whole by ordinance by the elected body. Land Use Element ( 66.1001(2)(h)) A compilation of objectives, policies, goals, maps and programs to guide the future development and redevelopment of public and private property. The element shall contain a listing of the amount, type, intensity, and net density of existing uses of land in the local governmental unit, such as agricultural, residential, commercial, industrial, and other public and private uses. The element shall analyze trends in the supply, demand and price of land, opportunities for redevelopment and existing and potential land-use conflicts. The element shall contain projections, based on the background information specified in par. (a), for 20 years, in 5-year increments, of future residential, agricultural, commercial and industrial land uses including the assumptions of net densities or other spatial assumptions upon which the projections are based. The element shall also include a series of maps that shows current land uses and future land uses that indicate productive agricultural soils, natural limitations for building site development, floodplains, wetlands and other environmentally sensitive lands, the boundaries of areas to which services of public utilities and community facilities, as those terms are used in par. (d), will be provided in the future, consistent with the timetable described in par. (d), and the general location of future land uses by net density or other classifications. viii