PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT NOVEMBER 15, 2012

Similar documents
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT SEPTEMBER 1, 2016

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT FEBRUARY 1, Maureen Tamuri, Community Development Director, AICP Michael Klein, Senior Planner

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT APRIL 7, 2016

P.C. RESOLUTION NO

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. Members of the Planning Commission. Andrew Cohen-Cutler, Associate Planner

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

Infill Residential Design Guidelines

RESOLUTION NO

County of Loudoun. Department of Planning MEMORANDUM. SUBJECT: ZMOD , Dulles North Business Park Comprehensive Sign Plan, 2 nd Referral

CITY OF LOMPOC PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Planning Commission Staff Report February 19, 2009

Planning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008

Request Conditional Use Permit (Automobile Repair Garage) Staff Planner Kevin Kemp

14825 Fruitvale Ave.

Architectural Review Board Report

City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission

PC RESOLUTION NO ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC)

Development and Engineering Services

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

Architectural and Appearance Design Manual. Town of Lexington, SC 1

COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES MANUAL

2 January 13, 2010 Public Hearing APPLICANT: AUTOBELL CAR WASH, INC

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

Community Character and Design Guidelines Questionnaire

AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD IBOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Coast Highway APN

- INVITATION - COURTESY INFORMATIONAL MEETING

CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G.3 STAFF REPORT August 18, 2015 Staff Contact: Peyman Behvand (707)

PRESENTED: April 15, 2008 FILE: DP No. 273/ Development Permit No Government Road Townhomes

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

8 February 9, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: 7-ELEVEN, INC.

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division

Design Review Commission Report

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

6 November 13, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT: CAH HOLDINGS, LLC

4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN

Request Conditional Use Permit (Automobile Service Station) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Bill Landfair

CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING ZONING INFORMATION FILE Z.I. NO POTRERO CANYON

12 January 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: TAILWIND DEVELOPMENT GROUP,LLC PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH

Division 9 Southwood Ranch (CR 484/475/475A Corridor-Gateway Development Overlay) Purpose and Intent Applicability.

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

PLNPCM Carl s Jr. Commercial Parking Lot at Redwood Road and 1700 South

LITTLETON CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES

City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

M E M O R A N D U M July 27, 2018

1. Consideration of a Notice of Exemption pursuant to Section 15301(e) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.

Narcoossee Roadway Corridor

Staff Planner Ashby Moss. Location 4752 Virginia Beach Boulevard GPIN Site Size acres AICUZ Less than 65 db DNL

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

R E S O L U T I O N. Single-Family Residence/ Church. 2,488 sq. ft. 2,488 sq. ft. Area Parking Required: Church

Resolution : Exhibit A. Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003

Chapter 11. Industrial Design Guidelines 11.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 11.3 SITE PLANNING GUIDELINES 11.2 GENERAL DESIGN OBJECTIVES

SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS. An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation

Architectural Review Board Report

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

Residential Design Guidelines

SPECIFIC PLAN Requirements

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion

Chapter 4: Jordan Road Character District

14 October 10, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MPB, INC

D1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

MEMORANDUM. This memo deals with proposed amendments to previously issued Development Permit No for Park Royal North.

TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: MARCH 23,2009

ITEM 7-A. CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum. Honorable President and Members of the Planning Board. Supervising Planner. Date: August 26, 2013

CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G. 1 STAFF REPORT August 4, Staff Contact: Tricia Shortridge (707)

Thanksgiving Point Office Site Plan Approval Planning Commission Report

CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

Request Conditional Use Permit (Religious Use) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jonathan Sanders

APPENDIX MATAKANA COMMERCIAL URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Site Design (Table 2) Fact Sheet & Focus Questions:

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 23, 2019

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN BAUTISTA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

The impacts examined herein take into account two attributes of aesthetic values:

36.1. PURPOSE APPLICABILITY DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES

Request Conditional Use Permit (Car Wash Facility) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jonathan Sanders

13. New Construction. Context & Character

COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ MEMORANDUM. To: Don Bussey, Zoning Administrator From: Lawrence Kasparowitz, Project Planner

Bayshore Boulevard Home Improvement District Design Guidelines

Agenda Report Meeting Date 08/01/18

Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004, Amendment Bylaw No. 4897, 2016 (Sewell s Landing)

general corridor design guidelines gen-0.0

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

WHEREAS, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing on September 11, 2008, the Prince George's County Planning Board finds:

Retail Signage Options. Planning Commission Special Meeting February 19, 2015

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW ORDINANCE DESIGN GUIDELINES DECEMBER 2000 PREPARED FOR THE MEREDITH PLANNING BOARD BY CHRISTOPHER P. WILLIAMS, ARCHITECTS

DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES

U.S. Highway 377 North Overlay District. 1. General Purpose and Description

6 May 14, 2014 Public Hearing

Design Guidelines and Development Standards for Southwood Ranch. Prepared February, 2016 by

SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')

Concrete Flat Tile Roofs Large Exposed Overhangs Oversized Bracing Predominately Gable Roofs With Non-Plaster Gable End Treatments.

SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT E. COLORADO BOULEVARD (PASEO COLORADO)

Transcription:

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT NOVEMBER 15, 2012 TO: FROM: Members of the Planning Commission Michael Klein, Associate Planner FILE NO.: 120000890 PROPOSAL: APPLICANT: Request for an Administrative Plan Review, Scenic Corridor Permit and Sign Permit to convert the existing Volvo car dealership to a Mini car dealership. The proposed changes include adding 2,836 square feet to the existing building, and modification of the existing façade, landscape and signage. The subject site is located at 24400 Calabasas Road, within the Commercial Retail (CR) zoning district, Scenic Corridor overlay zone and the West Calabasas Road Planning Guidelines. Tim Smith, Bob Smith BMW RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2012-534 approving File No. 120000890. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Commission adopt Resolution No. 2012-534 approving File No. 120000890. REVIEW AUTHORITY: The Planning Commission is reviewing this project because Section 17.62.050 of the Calabasas Municipal Code stipulates that Scenic Corridor Permits require review by the Commission. BACKGROUND:

Page 2 On September 14, 2012, Tim Smith from Bob Smith BMW, filed an Administrative Plan Review and Scenic Corridor permit to convert the existing Volvo car dealership, located at 24400 Calabasas Road, to a Mini car dealership. The project was reviewed by the Architectural Review Panel (ARP) on September 28, 2012, and the Development Review Committee (DRC) on October 2, 2012. Following the aforementioned meetings, the application was deemed incomplete on October 2, 2012, and the applicant was duly notified. Subsequently, the applicant filed for a sign permit on October 23, 2012. After addressing all incomplete items, the application was deemed complete on October 30, 2012, and scheduled for a public hearing with the Planning Commission. STAFF ANALYSIS: A. Existing Conditions: The subject site is an irregularly shaped lot located at 24400 Calabasas Road, within the Commercial Retail (CR) zoning district, Scenic Corridor overlay zone and the West Calabasas Road Planning Guidelines area. The Commercial Retail zoning district generally allows for a variety of retail uses and conditionally permits auto dealerships and associated services. The 2.79 acre lot was part of a larger parcel that has been subdivided and a large portion dedicated as open space. The narrow site is bound by Calabasas Road to the north, the former Pelican s Retreat restaurant to the west, the remainder of the CR-zoned subdivided parcel to the east, and open space to the south. The site is developed with a 34,126 square-foot building comprised of two levels and roof-top parking, two driveways, asphalt parking, retaining walls, landscaping and signage; and is currently being used as a Volvo car dealership. The existing dealership was approved on September 17, 2003, via a conditional use permit, oak tree permit, and variance (to allow the exit driveway access grade to be 11.2% instead of the maximum 8% allowed by the CMC). The approvals allowed for construction of the two-story dealership, removal of two heritage oak trees and the right to operate a car dealership inclusive of car repair services. As a result, the subject site has all the required permits to operate a full-service car dealership. Construction for the dealership was completed on August 3, 2005, and has remained in operation as a Volvo car dealership. B. Proposed Project: The subject site will remain a car dealership in conformance with current entitlements, and the proposed project does not involve a change or expansion of use. However, the applicant is requesting to make exterior changes in order to bring the existing structure and site into compliance with Mini s corporate design image. The proposed changes include: 1,700 square-foot addition to the showroom on the first floor, to create a more functional showroom.

Page 3 1,136 square-foot addition to the second floor, to create a Jewel Box to display new vehicle models. Removal of the green faux hip-roofs and lowering the overall height of the building from 44 feet to 39 feet above grade. Exterior façade remodel to include black aluminum composite metal panels, black frames, LED illuminated color accent frames, increased glass elements and faux mini vehicles. New building mounted signs, directional signs and a monument sign to identify the Mini brand. New entry wall features to compliment the architectural design of the building. Landscape improvements to enhance the vehicle display area and customer parking in front of the dealership, along Calabasas Road. C. Architecture: The proposed project involves transforming the architecture of the current building into a Modern style building, consistent with Mini s corporate image. The smooth stucco, which is currently painted orange, yellow and white, will be replaced with black aluminum composite metal panels, and the glass elements of the building will be increased. Exposed structural elements, LED illuminated color accent frames, and the Jewel Box will add significant visual interest to the building. The Jewel Box is a structural glass box that will cantilever over the front entrance, and will be used to display cars. The existing building uses a parapet roof to screen the roof-top parking, and includes two green faux hip-roofs. The green faux hip-roofs will be removed to create a uniform parapet roof, and the overall height of the building will be lowered from 44 feet to 39 feet above grade (with the exception of the elevator shaft, which will remain at 44 feet tall). The proposed parapets will be tall enough to screen the roof-top parking from public view. The modern design is a minimalistic approach that articulates Mini s image. The Architectural Review Panel reviewed this project On September 28, 2012. Although one member was concerned about the compatibility of the proposed modern design in this particular location, all panelists found that the building is very well designed. The panel noted that the proposed design is an improvement over the existing building and recommended approval of the design to the Planning Commission with a 2 to 1 vote. D. Scenic Corridor: The subject site is located within the Ventura Freeway Scenic Corridor overlay zone. The purpose of the Scenic Corridor overlay zoning district is to protect the economic and cultural base of the City by preventing the destruction of the natural beauty and environment of the City. The Scenic Corridor applies to major roadways identified in the General Plan as Scenic Corridors, from which the public may enjoy views of the hills and mountains within and surrounding the City. In order to protect the visual character of the Scenic Corridor, all development must comply with the City s

Page 4 Urban Design Guidelines in Section 17.20.070 of the CMC and the City s adopted Scenic Corridor Development Guidelines. As stated in the Scenic Corridor Development Guidelines, All structures within the Scenic Corridor shall avoid large straight, blank facades. Additionally, the Urban Design Guidelines in Section17.20.070 of the CMC includes similar requirements. Because the current building has a very wide freeway facing façade, the proposed design will help to break up the mass by creating vertical elements and using interesting building materials such as black aluminum composite metal panels. The proposed colors and materials will comply with the Guidelines by utilizing dark non-glare building and roof colors. Furthermore, in conformance with the Urban Design Guidelines, the Modern design, colors and materials will be incorporated throughout the entire building, not just the front façade. Other Mini dealerships in the area tend to stick out due to their boxy design and flat surroundings. In order to avoid another boxy design, the architect took advantage of the existing building shape to design a more interesting Mini dealership than you would typically see. Furthermore, the existing building is nestled into a hillside rather than sticking up from a flat ground. Thus, the black color of the proposed building is compatible with the background of the hillside, which is either green or yellow/brown depending on the time of the year. Finally, the proposed landscape will tie the site together with the natural vegetation on the adjacent hillside by utilizing similar plant material. As a result, the proposed project conforms to both the Scenic Corridor Development Guidelines and the Urban Design Guidelines. E. West Calabasas Road Planning Guidelines: The subject site is located within the West Calabasas Road Planning Guidelines (the Guidelines). The purpose of the Guidelines is to provide clear recommendations for the design, construction, review and approval of development within the West Calabasas Road area. While not adopted as law, the Guidelines are a tool to help achieve attractive functional projects that realize the goals of both the City and the community. The Guidelines specify that the portion of Calabasas road between Mureau Road and Parkway Calabasas should accommodate vehicular dealerships and similar uses. Dealerships should be designed to attract and appeal to customers who are in the market for luxury vehicles. The following design elements are outlined in the Guidelines: 1. Use high-quality authentic materials that are structurally heavy in appearance. Stucco is discouraged. 2. Each structure should reflect a single architectural style. 3. Blank walls are strongly discouraged.

Page 5 4. Divide the structure mass of wide buildings by using a change of roof or wall plane, projecting or recessing elements, or varying rooflines. 5. Use vertical elements on large structures to break up massing. 6. Emphasize the main entrance using lighting landscaping and architecture. The current building (Volvo) does not comply with all of the above mentioned design elements. Most notably, the current building is stucco and emphasizes horizontal lines on a very wide building; thus, increasing the perceived mass of the structure. Furthermore, the existing building borrows from Prairie style architecture but does not incorporate appropriate rustic colors and materials that are typically used in Prairie designs, resulting in a building that is a mismatch of architectural styles. In contrast, the proposed Mini dealership will feature consistent Modern style architecture, break up the horizontal mass with vertical elements such as the Jewel Box addition and aluminum composite metal panels that will have a structurally heavy appearance. The use of accent colors and the Jewel Box will emphasize the main entrance. As a result, the proposed project is more consistent with the West Calabasas Road Planning Guidelines than the current building. F. Signage: On March 25, 2004, the Planning Commission approved a sign program and variance to allow for the subject site to have three (3) building-mounted signs with a total of 140 square feet, two (2) monument signs and two (2) directional signs. In comparison, the applicant is proposing to install two (2) building-mounted signs (totaling 76 square feet), one (1) 20-foot tall monument sign and three (3) directional signs. The design of the signs, including the monument sign, will be similar to the BMW dealership signs except that Mini s signs will have a black background. The proposed buildingmounted signs are consistent with the previously approved variance for building mounted signs, and the monument sign and directional signs comply with the City s sign ordinance. G. Landscaping: The proposed project involves enhancing the landscape along the front of the property, adjacent to Calabasas Road. Such improvements include replacing the existing ledge stone walls with new decorative walls, replacing the landscape and adding new trees. The proposed landscape improvements will complement the Modern architectural style of the building, use drought tolerant plants, and help to better blend the project with the surrounding native vegetation. REQUIRED FINDINGS: The findings required in Section 17.62.050(D), 17.62.090(E) and 17.30.050(F) of the Calabasas Municipal Code for Scenic Corridor Permit, Administrative Plan Review and Sign Permit, respectively, are contained in the resolution attached as Exhibit A.

Page 6 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This project is Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15301, 15311 and 15332 of the California CEQA Guidelines. A Notice of Exemption has been prepared and is attached as Exhibit D. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: See conditions contained in the resolution attached as Exhibit A. PREVIOUS REVIEWS: Development Review Committee (DRC): October 2, 2012 No major issues were brought up. Architectural Review Panel (ARP): September 28, 2012 The panel majority recommends approval of the project. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-534 Exhibit B: Site Plans and Elevations Exhibit C: Photos and Color Renderings Exhibit D: LEED Checklist Exhibit E: Notice of Exemption

Page 7 TECHNICAL APPENDIX Location Map: Items shown in Italics in the Development Standards section below are identified as issues which are further analyzed in the Staff Analysis section of the staff report Development Standards: Code Limit Meets Code Lot Size: 121,749 Sq. Ft. Floor Area: Existing: 34,131 Sq. Ft. Proposed: 2,836 Sq. Ft. Total: 36,967 Sq. Ft. Floor Area Ratio (FAR): 0.30 0.20-0.40 Yes Setbacks:

Page 8 Development Standards: Code Limit Meets Code Front: Ft. Rear: Ft. Side: Ft. Side: Ft. Height: 39 Ft. 35 Ft. No* Site Coverage: Existing: 35,260 Sq. Ft. 30 % Proposed: 36,960 Sq. Ft. 30 % 78% of the net site area maximum Yes Parking Calculations # of Spaces Provided: 57 54 min Yes Proposed Color Palette: Body Color: Trim Color: Accent Color: Accent Color: Accent Color: Black Aluminum Composite Metal Panel Black Metal Frame Mini Red Lighted Color Frame Mini Yellow Lighted Color Frame Mini Green Lighted Color Frame Surrounding Properties: Existing Land Use Zoning General Plan Designation Site Auto Dealership Commercial Retail Business Retail West Restaurant Commercial Limited Business Limited Intensity East Vacant Commercial Retail Business Retail North Vehicle Storage Commercial Retail Business Retail South Open Space Open Space Development Restricted Open Space Resource Protected *Note: The original building was approved and constructed under the 1998 Land Use and Development Code which measured height differently. Adoption of the 2010 Land Use and Development Code resulted in a new way to measure height; and thus resulted in a building that is now legal non-conforming as to height. The proposed 39-foot tall building will be shorter than the current non-conforming 44-foot tall building.