ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Similar documents
Rosslyn Sector Plan Implementation

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Background

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

SP #94, AREP Rosslyn City Center

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

1401 Wilson Boulevard SP #429

Courthouse Square Implementation Comment/Response Matrix

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING, HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT Planning Division. Arlington County Planning Commission

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ROSSLYN GATEWAY URBAN DESIGN MANUAL JULY 15, 2011 REVISED JANUARY 30, KOHN PEDERSEN FOX ASSOCIATES PC. All rights reserved.

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Appendix I ARLINGTON COUNTY SECTOR PLANS SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS RELATED TO PUBLIC SPACES

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

DRAFT. October Wheaton. Design Guidelines

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

Adoption of the Rosslyn Sector Plan Site Plan Review Committee (SPRC) Meeting October 26, 2015

SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA. Courthouse Plaza 2100 Clarendon Boulevard Cherry and Dogwood Rooms (C&D) Arlington, VA 22201

MIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT

Highland Village Green Design Guidelines

Incentive Zoning Regulations Florida Municipal City of Orlando

Rosslyn Plaza PDSP (SP #422) SPRC Staff Presentation

ASPEN HILL Minor Master Plan Amendment

PLANNING IN ARLINGTON. Briefing to Katie Cristol

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this Ordinance is consistent with the City of Winter Garden Comprehensive Plan; and

AN ORDINANCE THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA HEREBY ORDAINS:

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

S I T E P L A N R E V I E W C O M M I T T E E M E E T I N G A G E N D A

MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 23, 2019

Housing and Coach House Guidelines - Ladner

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

Realizing Rosslyn: a new era of opportunity GOODY CLANCY WITH KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES RHODESIDE & HARWELL FARR ASSOCIATES W-ZHA

The broad range of permitted and special uses allowed in the district remain, but some descriptions have been clarified.

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

appendix and street interface guidelines

Executive Summary General Plan Amendment Initiation

SECTION 21. MU-VS MIXED USE VIRGINIA SQUARE DISTRICTS

Arlington County Retail Plan

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 16, 2018

SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Clarendon Boulevard Conference Room 311 Arlington, VA 22201

Location and Field Inspection: History: Master Plan Recommendation:

SITE PLAN AREA. Met Park 6 Site Area (122,368 sf) Met Park 4/5 The Bartlett. Met Park 3 The Acadia. Met Park 2 The Millennium.

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

Planning Commission Report

ROLL CALL Member Anthony, Member Avdoulos, Member Greco, Member Lynch, Member Maday, Chair Pehrson

DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS MEDICAL DISTRICT

ARLINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PLAN CHAIR GUIDE

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission

CONTENTS 8.0 LAND USE 8.1 GENERAL LAND USE 8.2 RESIDENTIAL 8.3 MIXED USE 8.4 COMMERCIAL 8.5 EMPLOYMENT LANDS

M i s s i o n B a y W a t e r f r o n t

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Pentagon Centre (SP#297) Phase I Site Plan Amendments SPRC #3

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion

Clairtrell Area Context Plan

REQUEST Current Zoning: O-15(CD) (office) Proposed Zoning: TOD-M(CD) (transit oriented development mixed-use, conditional)

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 13, 2015

OCEAN BOULEVARD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PD-5)

DRAFT FOR COMMENT: EASTLAKE AVENUE PEDESTRIAN DISTRICT OVERLAY ORDINANCE

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

1. Avoid extensive blank walls that would detract from the experience and appearance of an active streetscape.

CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF OAKVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER

Sign Regulations. for Urban Regional Shopping Centers. County Board Meeting November 5, CPHD, Planning Division

Narcoossee Roadway Corridor

Highway Oriented Commercial Development Criteria

Yonge Eglinton Centre Urban Design Guidelines

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of March 15, 2014

CITY CLERK. Consolidated Clause in North York Community Council Report 8, which was considered by City Council on October 26, 27 and 28, 2004.

DRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES

McDonald s Restaurant - Purcellville Town of Purcellville Special Use Permit Statement of Justification July 24, 2014

PLANNING STAFF REVIEW

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

Commercial Development Standards. City of Homestead

SP # Carlin Springs Road The Springs

4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of March 15, 2014

CHAPTER 13 DESIGN GUIDELINES

Downtown / Ballough Road Redevelopment Board

(Ord. No. 743, )

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )

5.1 Site Plan Guidelines

14 April 9, 2014 Public Hearing

(DC1) Direct Development Control Provision DC1 Area 4

5.1.1 The streetscape along US Highway 64 (Brevard Road); and, The built environment within new residential developments; and,

Slot Home Task Force Meeting #5 Phase 2 June 8, 2017

Urban Design Brief to 1557 Gordon Street & 34 Lowes Road West

CPD Rules and Regulations. Arapahoe Square Zoning and Design Standards/Guidelines

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Realizing Rosslyn: a new era of opportunity GOODY CLANCY WITH KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES RHODESIDE & HARWELL FARR ASSOCIATES W-ZHA

Seneca Meadows. Block 4 Locate office, technology, and medical development adjacent to I Screen views of garage structures from I-270.

13 THORNHILL YONGE STREET STUDY IMPLEMENTATION CITY OF VAUGHAN OPA 669 AND TOWN OF MARKHAM OPA 154

Central Village Design Guidelines Westport, MA

Resolution : Exhibit A. Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003

Transcription:

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of March 20, 2007 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT #2 Additional and Revised Information DATE: March 20, 2007 SUBJECT: Request to Advertise Public Hearings on Amendments to Section 25B. C-O Rosslyn Commercial Office Building, Retail, Hotel and Multiple-Family Dwelling Districts, to allow additional height up to a maximum of four hundred seventy (470) feet above sea level for properties within the boundaries of Central Place, defined as the blocks bounded by 19 th Street North, North Lynn Street, Wilson Boulevard, and Fort Myer Drive, by the Planning Commission on April 9, 2007, and the County Board on April 21, 2007. C.M. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize advertisement of public hearings on amending, reenacting, and recodifying Section 25B. C-O Rosslyn Commercial Office Building, Retail, Hotel and Multiple- Family Dwelling Districts, to allow additional height up to a maximum of four hundred seventy (470) feet above sea level for properties within the boundaries of Central Place, by the Planning Commission on April 9, 2007, and the County Board on April 21, 2007. DISCUSSION: At their meeting on March 17, 2007, the County Board held a public hearing on the subject proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment language. In discussing this item, the County Board raised several questions and concerns regarding the proposed amendment to be advertised, and requested that staff provide responses to the issues raised and provide any necessary revisions at their March 20, 2007, recessed meeting. Rooftop Signs A question raised by the County Board was whether a guideline or provision to restrict rooftop signs in Central Place could be included in the proposal. To enable consideration of such a provision, staff proposes additional language in the ordinance that would prohibit all rooftop signs for any project within Central Place (See Attachment 1, E.4.). This broad language would provide flexibility in the final action by the County Board, but does not necessarily reflect staff s final recommendation. If advertised, staff would evaluate the potential impacts and consider County Manager: County Attorney: Staff: Anthony Fusarelli, Jr., DCPHD Planning PLA-4652 Supplemental Report #2

approaches that restrict the location of such signs rather than prohibiting rooftop signs entirely. These different approaches would be within the scope of this advertising. Goals for Additional Height The proposed ordinance amendment identifies an Enhanced Rosslyn Skyline as the principal County objective to be achieved by permitting additional height in Central Place. As suggested by the County Board, there may be instances where achieving other goals in addition to an enhanced skyline may be a desired outcome of the additional height. To incorporate this concept, staff has revised the proposed amendment language to indicate that an enhanced skyline may be one of several desired goals attained by permitting additional height (see Attachment 1, E.3.). Urban Design Guidelines Another matter discussed by the County Board was the proposed resolution s expectation that developments achieve the highest feasible urban design standards. In particular, clarification was needed to identify those standards and indicate that the County has urban design principles in a variety of locations, including sector plans, special area studies, and a variety of other plans and policies. With regard to Rosslyn specifically, the Rosslyn Station Area Plan Addendum provides a set of urban design principles, which is complemented by the efforts of the Rosslyn Working Group s urban design guidelines. To further clarify the principle s intent, staff has proposed additional language in the resolution to indicate that County plans and policies would be the primary source of such guidelines (See Attachment 2). These plans and policies get revised over time, and therefore could be expected to reflect the County s current standards. Implications of the Resolution The County Board asked whether, since the resolution establishes specific urban design expectations for Central Place that are referenced by the C-O Rosslyn district, would it restrict what the County could require in zoning districts that do not reference specific guidelines? Staff concludes that this approach would not limit the County s ability to expect that pertinent design guidelines be met by special exception developments in other areas of the County. Through the special exception site plan process, the County could continue to reference relevant adopted plans and policies to identify the desired planning and urban design principles that proposals are expected to satisfy. Relationship Between Community Benefit and Additional Height Although not part of the County Board discussion, questions had been raised regarding the relationship between community benefit and additional height. Consistent with the County s policy on special exception site plan projects, it is anticipated that additional density and height for any project within C-O Rosslyn would be permitted only in exchange for important community benefits commensurate with the extent of additional density and height. Sec 25B. C-O Rosslyn - 2 -

ATTACHMENT 1 SECTION 25B. "C-O ROSSLYN" COMMERCIAL OFFICE BUILDING, RETAIL, HOTEL AND MULTIPLE-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICTS * * * E. Provision for Additional Density and Height. 1. In considering the approval of a site plan, the County Board may permit additional density, above 3.8 floor area ratio (FAR) for office, retail and service commercial uses, above 4.8 FAR for hotels and multiple-family dwellings, and above the existing density on a site when it is already greater than 3.8 FAR for office, retail and service commercial uses, or above 4.8 FAR for hotels and multiple-family dwellings, up to maximum of 10.0 FAR and/or height up to a maximum of three hundred (300) feet. Increases in density and height may be approved when the County Board finds that the development proposal offers important community benefits identified in approved plans for the area and meets the other special exception criteria of the Zoning Ordinance. In considering such modification, the County Board may also consider characteristics of the site and the area as described in Section 36.H.5. of this ordinance and the plans and policies adopted for the area. Provisions of Section 36.H.7. for the approval of additional height and density shall not be applicable in the "C-O Rosslyn" district. In no case shall application of the modification of use provisions of Section 36.H.5. be applied to permit a density of more than 10.0 FAR or a height of more than three hundred (300) feet except as described below. 2. To enable the County to provide for adequate streets the County Board may grant additional density (FAR) within the height limit up to an amount that would be permitted if any area dedicated from the site for street purposes were permitted to be counted in calculating density. 3. To enable the County to achieve, among other things, an enhanced Rosslyn skyline the County Board may grant additional height up to maximum of four hundred seventy (470) feet above sea level for projects within Central Place (defined as the area bounded by 19 th Street N., North Lynn Street, Wilson Boulevard, and North Fort Myer Drive). Site plan projects within Central Place may be approved when the County Board finds a project is generally consistent with the April 21, 2007 County Board Resolution on Urban Design Principles for Rosslyn Central Place, and additionally meets the standards of Section 36.H.3. of this ordinance. 4. In no case shall rooftop signs be permitted on any building located within Central Place that receives additional density and height by application of either Section 25B.E.1 or Section 25B.E.3. of this ordinance. * * * Sec 25B. C-O Rosslyn - 3 -

ATTACHMENT 2 DRAFT 3/16/2007 Resolution on Urban Design Principles for Rosslyn Central Place Adopted by the County Board April, 2007 WHEREAS the Rosslyn Coordinated Redevelopment District ( RCRD ) was adopted by the County Board in 1996 and designated on the County's General Land Use Plan; and WHEREAS sites within the RCRD have been rezoned to C-O Rosslyn" and on such rezoned sites special exception site plans, with building heights up to 300 feet, may be approved by the County Board; and WHEREAS the policies of the Arlington County General Land Use Plan and the Rosslyn Station Area Plan generally call for the greatest building heights to be focused closest to the Metro Station with building heights tapering down as locations are farther away from the station; and WHEREAS the Rosslyn Station Area Plan calls for the creation of a Central Place that is the hub of pedestrian and retail activity in Rosslyn with a unique character to its architecture and streetscape design; WHERAS the Arlington County Board passed a 2002 Resolution Governing Building Heights in Rosslyn that established general principles for considering height and design of future site plans within the RCRD; and WHEREAS the Rosslyn Working Group was established by the County Manager to further consider planning principles relating to building height, land use and urban design within Central Place (defined as the two blocks bounded by North Lynn Street, 19 th Street N., Fort Myer Drive, and Wilson Boulevard) and to make specific recommendations based on a thorough analysis of these principles; THEREFORE the Arlington County Board hereby resolves that the following major principles shall be used in considering future site plans within Central Place: Building, site, and streetscape designs should create clearly recognizable mid-block pedestrian connections that enhance connectivity to the Rosslyn Metro Station; Project design should maximize, to the extent possible, retail, restaurant, entertainment, and commercial uses within the first two floors of the building; Despite existing variations in local topographic conditions, building bases across the Central Place blocks should possess heights at approximately equal elevations above sea level; Sec 25B. C-O Rosslyn - 4 -

The number of curb cuts should be minimized, especially along North Moore Street, and parking entrances should be consolidated to maximize storefronts and retail continuity; Building design should maximize active retail and other pedestrian-oriented uses by maximizing the extent of clear glazing and ground level façade transparency along public street frontages; and Buildings should achieve the highest feasible urban design standards, as reflected in County plans and policies, with regard to such elements as: curb-cuts, parking entrance consolidation, sidewalk clear width, retail activation, pedestrian-oriented units, and ground level façade transparency along public street frontages; and IN ADDITION, the Arlington County Board further resolves that the following major principles shall be used in considering additional building height above 300 feet for future site plans within Central Place: Buildings should include distinctive architectural features such as sculpted rooftop designs or significant tapering in its building form and massing; Any additional building height should be constructed with sensitivity to not adversely impact the panoramic view shed from any public observation deck (approved or built) within Central Place; Projects should otherwise be consistent with the principles included in the September 2002 County Board Resolution Governing Building Heights in Rosslyn; Buildings should receive confirmation from the Federal Aviation Administration (F.A.A.) that the project is not a hazard to air navigation or that the project does not require notice to or approval by the F.A.A. Sec 25B. C-O Rosslyn - 5 -