City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering staff report - dated October 14, 2009 and the Hearing Examiner Report signed October 21, 2009.

Similar documents
Regarding Case Number: VTT CN-1A ~ 2.01 H ~ H ^ Project Address: 3321, 3351 S. La Cienega Boulevard, W. Jefferson Boulevard

SBCAG STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: March 17, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 5I

Planning Commission Report

Honorable Members: C. D. No. 9

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

ANTONIO R. VILLARAIGOSA MAYOR. Transmitted herewith, is the City Engineer's report dated September 28, 2006 for Council review and approval of:

EXPO LINE COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS NOVEMBER 27 TH & DECEMBER 3 RD Los Angeles Department of City Planning

- INVITATION - COURTESY INFORMATIONAL MEETING

STREET DESIGNATIONS AND STANDARD ROADWAY DIMENSIONS

CALIFORNIA ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR NOTICE OF PREPARATION. Responsible Agencies, Trustee Agencies, Stakeholders, and Interested Parties

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

CITY CLERK. Consolidated Clause in North York Community Council Report 8, which was considered by City Council on October 26, 27 and 28, 2004.

Appendix L 2006 LADOT Pedestrian and Traffic Counts

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

PROJECT STATEMENT LOCATION/DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING. 19 th AVENUE NORTH EXTENSION PROJECT FROM SPRINGDALE DRIVE TO NORTH 2 ND STREET/U.S.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Environmental Review Process

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 23, 2019

- INVITATION - COURTESY INFORMATIONAL MEETING

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

Convention Center Proposal Supplement January 2015 CURRENT RELATED PLANS & PROJECTS

Gratigny Parkway East Extension Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study

Whittier Greenway Trail. Est. 2009

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

County of Los Angeles

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

City of Toronto. Emery Village Transportation Master Plan

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUREAU OF STREET SERVICES REPORT NO.1 Page 1 of 5. Date: October 7,2016 CD# 14

Report to City Council

ARGENTA TRAIL (CSAH 28/63) REALIGNMENT SOUTH PROJECT (CP 63-25)

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE GEORGE KOTSIFAS MANAGING DIRECTOR, DEVELOPMENT & COMPLIANCE SERVICES & CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL

Errata 1 Landmark Apartments Project Final Environmental Impact Report

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 5H

D3 January 14, 2015 Public Hearing

December 18, January 14, 2019, 5:00 P.M. 7:00 P.M. See below for additional information.

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

People who are members of historically disenfranchised racial, ethnic, cultural, and other identity groups are encouraged to apply.

A. INTRODUCTION B. PROJECT LOCATION

The subject site plan amendment proposes the following revisions to the approved site plan:

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 16, 2018

Venice Pumping Plant Dual Force Main Project Draft EIR

SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY MIMP Condition Status Matrix: July 1, 2015 June 30, 2016

Urban Planning and Land Use

Ripley East. Sketch Plan Amendment No A Preliminary Plan No Site Plan No MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Eric Angstadt, Director, Planning and Development

1.0 PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED

Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk Final EIS Appendix D - Supplemental Draft EIS Comments and Responses October 2016.

Project facts that will help me to understand the I-710 Corridor Project and DEIR/EIS

PLANNING COMMISSION Work Session Meeting Agenda

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 3I

PLANNING APPROVAL & SIDEWALK WAIVER STAFF REPORT Date: December 1, 2016

Memorandum Planning. Thursday, January 8, 2015

Tips on Writing to the Planning Commission

RECIRCULATED NOTICE OF PREPARATION/NOTICE OF PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING

Silver Line CPAM UPDATE. Transportation and Land Use Committee October 14, 2016

Services Department F May 28, 2007

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND SCOPING MEETING FOR THE LAND PARK COMMERCIAL CENTER PROJECT

CHARLES PUTMAN CHARLES PUTMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC

G. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT. The following summarizes the Recreation and Open Space Element:

TOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION

Sea Level Rise Workshop #4 May 22, 2018 Venice Local Coastal Program SUMMARY

ALI-ABA Course of Study Land Use Institute: Planning, Regulation, Litigation, Eminent Domain, and Compensation

Regarding actual construction when development occurs, the following applicable guidelines are provided to address public safety issues:

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

CITY PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Call to Artists Public Art for Los Angeles Metro Stations

Tonight s Agenda. Summary Presentation Open House. Group Discussion Next Steps: online community wide survey

Historical Perspectives for Hydrogen Safety, Regulations, Codes and Standards (California and U.S.A.)

2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 AUTHORITY 2.2 PURPOSE AND INTENT 2.3 SITE LOCATION

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Executive Summary. NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor

Transit / Housing Oriented Redevelopment

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 28, 2017 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO

LAND USE AMENDMENT DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL CORE (WARD 7) MACLEOD TRAIL SE AND 5 AVENUE SE BYLAW 254D2017

OCEANSIDE DEVELOPER S CONFERENCE. 1. 9:30-10:30 a.m. Proposed hotel on a 12,000 sq. ft. site at the northeast corner of Topeka St. and Tremont St.

CITY OF CYPRESS 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California (714) DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PERMIT PROCESS

At Your Disposal CUP Amendment, Lot 20, Village Service Commercial, at 128 Bastille Dr. (PLN17-208)

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 28, 2017 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT-2

Town of Windham. Planning Department 8 School Road Windham, ME voice fax

County of Fairfax, Virginia

ITEM #8. Regional Smart Growth Program. Regional Smart Growth Program. Presentation Overview. Coast Highway Vision and Stategic Plan.

CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION

12 January 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: TAILWIND DEVELOPMENT GROUP,LLC PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH

City Council Special Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO. C.

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

Agenda Item. Applicant Logan Virginia Properties, LLC Property Owners Byler Azalea, LLC & Gateway Free Will Baptist Chuch

Green Line North Centre City Alignment

Pine Avenue Improvement Project

Executive Summary General Plan Amendment Initiation

PLNPCM Carl s Jr. Commercial Parking Lot at Redwood Road and 1700 South

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BUSINESS MEETING ACTION ITEM. Endorsement of Design for Route 7/George Washington Boulevard Overpass. Algonkian and Broad Run

CURRICULUM VITAE L. EARLE GRAHAM

No comments related to land use and planning issues were received in response to the Notice of Preparation.

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division

CITY OF WESTERVILLE, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT. BASSEM BITAR / (614) /

Redevelopment of Ajax Plaza Area Public Open House Meeting February 19, 2015 Questions and Answers

A. OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

Transcription:

- the Rifkin Transportation Los Feliz Towers 4455 Los Feliz Boulevard Suite 1403 Planning Group E-mail allynrifkin@gmail.com Telephone and fax -- (323) 664-2805 Mobile phone - (323) 697-1594 February 3, 2010 Rick Gunderson 712 Pacific Ave. Venice, CA 90291 Re: Use of Lot Adjacent to 702 Pacific Avenne Mr. Gunderson: Date: _---"le"-:~j.;..l-1 Sul;lmittedin P lfj Committee CouncilFileNo:~19J;:(g_-_1Ib"-,,,--p,--1 -- Item No.:_~4-;;-:--;---c---- Deputy:_..Jf.:::Vf)~\A:::..::..V This letter summarizes my independent review of the potential Coastal Access uses of the lot at 702 Pacific Avenue, immediately adjacent and north of your property. The City of Los Angeles has approved the vacation of the City Street easement adjacent to your property; however, that decision may be appealed to the California Coastal Commission. I understand that yon have requested my expert opinion about the traffic implications of the street vacation and in particular want me to address the assertion that the parcel could be used for public parking. I am qualified to respond to that request because of my history as a 30 plus year employee of the City of Los Angeles, Department of Transportation, and, in particular, my experience as the Chief of the Transportation Planning Bureau which oversaw the design, development and operation of the City's off-street parking program. My resume is attached. CONDITIONS I visited the site on January 12,2010 and reviewed the following documents: City of Los Angeles Department December 21, 2009 of Public Works - Approval of Permit 9-01, dated City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering staff report - dated October 14, 2009 and the Hearing Examiner Report signed October 21, 2009. City of Los Angeles, Department of City Planning - Venice Community Plan, adopted September 29, 2000. City of Los Angeles, Department of City Planning - Venice Coastal Land Use Plan and Coastal Access Policies - approved by the California Coastal Commission, November 14, 2000. City of Los Angeles Ordinance 142,306 - Minimum design standards for public parking lots. City of Los Angeles, Department of Transportation- Manual of Policies and Procedures- Approval of public parking facilities. The subject lot is located between Royal Court and Pacific Avenue adjacent to the previously dedicated right of way for Thornton Place (see vicinity map, Exhibit I and site map, Exhibit 2). Between Royal

Court and Pacific Avenue, a substandard sidewalk exists for pedestrian access. To the best of my knowledge, there are no plans to construct this connection as a standard street. The pedestrian-way along the Thornton Place right of way is snbstandard because it is 4 feet wide and there is no handicap ramp, with stair only access from this sidewalk elevation to the existing sidewalk on Pacific Avenue. I observed traffic circulation on tbe existing Royal Court and Thornton Place. These roads are constructed as alleyways (approximately 14 to 15 feet wide and less than 10 feet wide behind some of the residences) and serve local traffic only to the adjacent multiple family residences. According to the requirements contained in the Bureau of Engineering and Department of Public Works reports, your request to vacate the previously dedicated right-of-way has been approved snbject to a condition that you re-dedicate tbe pedestrian walkway as a 5-foot sidewalk, including handicap accessible ramps to Pacific Avenue. The remaining parcel, after the sidewalk dedication, is 15 feet by 75 feet. CONCLUSIONS 1. The remaining parcel cannot be used for the extension of Thornton Place as a complete street. The minimum standard (alleyway) would require a 20 foot right of way. The alignment of any potential street would create an unsafe off-set intersection at Pacific Avenue with the existing Thornton Avenue. 2. The remaining parcel cannot be used for public parking. City standards require a minimum width of27.5 feet to account for parked vehicles and circulation around the parked vehicles (see Minimum Parking Bay Width Table, Exhibit 3). The internal circulation requirements of the Los Angeles Department of Transportation could not be satisfied on the remaining parcel, meaning that cars conld not turn around and one would expect backing of vehicles onto the adjacent public streets. During my visit to the site, Iobserved that two-way travel at the existing intersection of Royal Court and Thornton Place to be constrained by limited site distance and minimal roadway width. 3. The Venice Coastal Land Use Plan identifies the potential for creating a public parking garage on the MTA Maintenance facility, immediately north of the subject parcel (see Venice LUP map- Exhibit 4). Your requirement to provide an improved 5- foot pedestrian way provides the necessary pedestrian connection between that proposed parking structure and the beaches to the west. 4. Policy I.G.9 of the Venice Coastal Land Use Plan provides, in order to preserve coastal access, that public rights of way in the Venice Coastal Zone shall be reserved for public transportation uses inclnding use by private vehicles, pedestrians and bicyclists. Given my observation about the infeasiblity of using this right of way for automobile access (see conclusion #1 above), yonr action to construct the sidewalk, inclnding ramp, will provide for bicyclists and pedestrians and is consistent with the satisfaction of this policy. - 2-4455 Los Feliz Blvd, Suite #1403 allynrifkin<{u.gmail.com

In my opinion, the City of Los Angeles appeared to fully consider the Coastal Access issues and applied appropriate findings and conditions to your request for the street right of way vacation. Please feel free to call me at should you have further questions or need for additional analysis. Very truly yours, f Allyn D. Rifkin, P.E.lPTOE Transportation EngineerlPlanner Registered Traffic Engineer - State of Califomia - TR-1112-3 - 4455 Los Feliz Blvd, Suite #1403 allynrifkin@gmail.com

ALLYN D. RIFKIN, PE, PTOE TRANSPORTATION PLANNERJENGINEER 4455 Los Feliz Blvd, Suite 1403-323-697 1594 (cell) allynrifkin@gmailcom Mr. Rifkin has over 30 years experience in the field of transportation engineering and planning. Included in that experience are assignments in both the private and public sectors, ranging from consultant for developers to research for the Automobile Club of Southern California. Until recently, he was the CHIEF OF THE BUREAU OF PLANNING AND LAND USE DEVELOPMENT for the Los Angeles Department of Transportation, responsible for managing a staff of 38 professionals and serving as the key department liaison between the development community and City Council on traffic mitigation and transportation planning issues. Rifkin was also in charge of the development of off-street parking for the City, which involved the management of 115 parking facilities with a budget of $32.7 million. As a private consultant, Mr. Rifkin is assisting the Community Redevelopment Agency in a "complete streets" initiative; the City Planning Department in its revision to the City's Mobility Element of the General Plan, the Eagle Rock neighborhood in the formation of the Colorado Boulevard Pilot Community Parking program and County Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky in a proposal to convert Olympic and Pico Boulevards into a one-way pair. Professionally, Allyn is active in the Urban Land Institute and the Institute of Transportation Engineers - he has served as the president of the ITE'S largest Chapter of ITE, the Southern California Chapter, with over 1,100 members. In addition to serving on the National Transit and Transportation Planning committees, he has been instrumental on national steering committees for the ITE Trip Generation Committee and the Urban Goods Movement Committee. He has lectured extensively on the topics of traffic impact mitigation and on neighborhood traffic controls. His college education began with a B.S. in Systems Engineering at UCLA and led to an M.S. in Transportation Engineering at Northwestern University. Rifkin is nationally recognized for his expertise in travel demand forecasting. His more recent work has involved traffic plans to relieve congestion in various hot spots of development in Southern California including the South Coast Plaza area of Orange County, Downtown Los Angeles, Westwood, the LAX Transportation Corridor (the initial area in Los Angeles to adopt a traffic impact mitigation fee), and Warner Center. He was involved in the creation of five transportation trust funds with current balances exceeding $23 million for transportation improvements. In his role as mediator of development traffic impact Mr. Rifkin launched a program currently exceeding $1.5 million in neighborhood traffic controls. -4-4455 Los Feliz Blvd, Snite #1403 ;illynrifkin(ajgmai 1.com

Bing Maps 702 Pacific Ave, Venice, CA 90291-3253 EXHIBIT 1 VICINITY MAP.'j,, (." B.'! Y 1ge1es t north Allyn D. Rifkin, PE/PTOE - 5-4455 Los Feliz Blvd, Suite #1403 a IIynri fkin(illgmai I.com

EXHIBIT 2 - SITE MAP Pi /,re" to be retaeec fo! coaster access 75 feet 702 PACIFIC AVE t north \ \ Proposed Street Vacation (not to scale) 704 PACIFIC AVE Coastal Act Requirements As directed by motion of the City Council (Council File 06-2821) and on behalf of Rick Gunderson, the Bureau of Engineering (BOE) has applied to the City Engineer for a Coastal Development Permit as required by the Municipal Code (Section 12.20.2 et seq.). Public hearing notices were mailed to interested parties on September 10. 2009. and a public hearing was held on September 23. 2009 at the Venice-Abbot Kinney Branch Library. In addition to staff, four people attended the hearing, The only oral comment was a request for information about the street vacation and the coastal permitting processes. In addition, James Murez submitted a written comment on October 1. 2009, Mr. Murez felt the area proposed for vacation should be converted into a parking area with landscaping. -6-4455 Los Feliz Blvd, Suite #1403 allynri fkin@gll1ail.coll1

EXHIBIT 3 - MINIMUM PARKING IlAY WIDTHS CITY OF LOS ANGELES PARKING BA Y WIDTHS FOR ONE-WA Y TRAFFIC AND SINGLE LOADED AISLES, BASED ON CHART NO. 21N ORDINANCE NO. 142,306 Parking 8'-4" 8'-6" 8'-8" 8' 10" 9'.<)" 9' 2" 9'-4" Angle Stalls Stalls" Stalls Stalls* Stalls Stalls" Stalls 30 27'-6" 27'-6" 27'-6" 27' 6" 27'-6" 27' 6" 27' 6" 32.5 28'-1" 28'~1" 28' 1" 28' 1" 28'-1" 28',1" 28'-1" 35 28' 7" 28'-7" 28'-7" 28' 7" 28'-7" 28'-7" 28' 7" 37,5 ~ 29' 1" 29'-1" 29' 1" 29' 1" 29' 1" 29' 1" 40 29' 11" ~ ~ 29' 6" 29' 6" 29' 6" 29' 6" 42.5 30'-11" 30' 6" 30'-1" 29' 10" 29' 10" 29' 10" 29' 10" 45 31'-11" 3"-6" 31'-1" 30' 8" 30' 3" 30' 3" 30' 2" 47,5 32' 11" 32' 6" 32'-1" 31' 8" 31'-3" 31'-10" 30' 5" 50 33' 10" 33' 5" 33' 0" 32' 7" 32' 2" 31' 9" 31'-4" 52.5 34'-9" 34' 3" 33' 9" 33'4" 32'-11" 32'-6" 32'-1" 55 35' 7" 35'-1" 34'-7" 34' 2" 33' 8" 33' 3" 32'-10" 57,5 36' 5" 35' 11" 35' 5" 35' 0" 34'-6" 34' 0" 33' 7" 60 3"(' 3" 36' 9" 36' 3" 35' 9" 35' 3" 34' 9" 34'-4" 62,5 38' 0" 37'-6" 37'-0" 36'-6" 36' 0" 35' 6" 35'-0" 65 38' 9" 38' 2" 37' 8" 37' 2" 36'-8" 36' 2" 35' 8" 67,5 39' 6" 38'-11" 38' 5" 37' 11" 37'4" 36' 10" 36'-4" 70 40' 3" 39' 8" 39' 2" 38' 7" 38' 1" 37' 6" 37' 0" 72,5 40'-11" 40'-4" 39' 10" 39' 3" 38' 9" 38' 2" 37' 8" 75 41'-8" 41' 1" 40'-7" 40'-0" 39' 5" 38' 10" 38'4" 77.5 42'-5" 41'-10" 41'-3" 40'-8" 40' 1" 39' 6" 39' 0" 80 43' 1" 42'.(5" 41'-11" 41'-4" 40' 9" 40' 2" 39' 7" 82,5 43'-9" 43'-1" 42' 6" 41'-11" 41'-1" 40'-9" 40'-2" 85 44' 6" 43' 10" 43' 3" 42' 7" 42' 0" 41'-4" 40' 9" 87,5 45' 3" 44'-7" 43' 11" 43'-4" 42' 8" 42' 0" 41' 5" 90 46' 0" 45'-4" 44'.(5" 44'-0" 43'-4" 42' 8" 42' 0" PARKING BAY DIMENSIONS CHART NO.2 ONE WAY TRAFFIC SINGLE LOADED AISLES Allyn PartIng Bay Width allynri tkin(i:ogmaij.com

VENICE LUP POl.lr"! ES (approved by Coastal Commission November!4, 1000) Page 3-5 Exhibit 4 - Venice LUP Map '.! Potential Facilitv Beach Impact Zone Expanded Beach Impact Zone Existing Public Parking Potential New or Expanded Surface Parking Site...,.,,... * Exhibit 17a Coastal Access Map Parking and Beach Impact Zone Potential Public Parking Structure Site Privately Owned Public Parking 4455 Los Feliz Blvd, Suite #1403 allynrifkin@gmail.com

-~--: 'i"" U!Z... --'-,,=- \.1