APPENDIX A 6 CONCEPTUAL PRELIMINARY PLAN GUIDE AND CHECKLIST FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS CARRBORO DEVELOPMENT GUIDE APPENDIX A

Similar documents
THREE-STEP DESIGN PROCESS FOR OPEN SPACE SUBDIVISIONS

Exhibit A. 8:9 Scuffletown Rural Conservation District

CHAPTER 22 Rural Open Space Community Developments

IV. Development in the Rural Overlay District

ARTICLE VI AGRICULTURAL PROTECTION DISTRICT

Major Subdivision Sketch Plan Checklist

ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 404 MASTER PLANNING

Chapter 5: Natural Resources and Environment

COMMUNITY DESIGN. GOAL: Create livable and attractive communities. Intent

Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan

Sanford/Lee County Technical Review Committee (TRC) DEADLINES & MEETING DATES

PART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY. Proposed Land Use: 120 single-family lots. The application is Attachment A. The site plan is Attachment B.

Design Guidelines. for Conservation Subdivisions For Conservation Subdivisions. Town of Wallkill New York. in Wallkill, NY. in Wallkill, New York

Zoning Ordinance Chapter 10

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 2010 Legislative Session. Council Members Dernoga and Olson

E. RURAL COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PARK MODEL

PART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY. The application is Attachment A. The site plan is Attachment B.

AMENDMENT NO. 30 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWN OF MILTON

Procedures IV. V. Rural Road Design Option

CONSERVATION SUBDIVISIONS & SITE DESIGN

E. Natural areas include habitats such as wetlands, tidal marshes, waterways, natural drainage-ways, woodlands and grassland meadows.

Planning for and Managing Open Space and Natural Areas

Draft Stillwater 2030 Comprehensive Plan- Goals and Policies

Zoning Ordinance Article 3

Applicant Name Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code . Property Owner Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code

EXHIBIT B PROJECT NARRATIVE POULSBO MEADOWS

STREAM BUFFERS

City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission

A Guide to Open Space Design Development in Halifax Regional Municipality

Mitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative. Introduction

Approved 8/18/94 Revised 3/21/02 Revised 5/14/09

Environmental Protection Ordinances (Performance Zoning) Bedminster Township, Bucks County

ARTICLE 17 SITE PLAN REVIEW

2.1 Principles & Objectives

City of Lafayette Staff Report

BISCUIT RUN PARK MASTER PLAN

Conservation Development

Chapter IV: Development Pattern

MODEL ORDINANCE FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATURAL, CULTURAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES IN MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS. Hunterdon County, New Jersey

2.0 AREA PLANS. Lakeside Business District. Lakeside Business District Land Use Categories:

CHAPTER 4 FUTURE LAND USE AND URBAN SERVICES DISTRICTS

Tennessee Stormwater Management Program. Stormwater Management Site Assessment and Inventory Checklist. Quick Check o Vicinity Map within Watershed

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

Chapter 131 GENERAL REFERENCES

AREASTRUCTURE PLAN AMENDMENT COCHRANE NORTH

ARTICLE 9: Landscaping

OVERMOUNTAIN VICTORY TRAIL BURKE CALDELL CORRIDOR FEASIBLITY STUDY REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS CALDWELL COUNTY PATHWAYS

RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT / SUBDIVISION AND REZONING CONCEPT AND DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE

Chapter 10 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS

Vision Statement for the Town of Flower Mound Master Plan The Town of Flower Mound Master Plan furthers the established community based vision to:

PRELIMINARY REPORT. HIGHWAY 18 CORRIDOR NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN VILLAGE OF DOUSMAN November, 2014

ARTICLE 13 STREETS General

City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission

Planned Residential Neighborhoods Land Use Goals

General Location Annex, Rezone & Preliminary Plat Lansdowne Addition, Unit Three

CITY OF ZEELAND PLANNING COMMISSION

II. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

BROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION

Plat Requirements CHECKLIST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division

WELCOME. Land North of STEVENAGE. We would like to thank you for attending our public exhibition today.

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN:

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

Baumgarten MPUD. Exhibit 3 Evaluation Criteria

Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Conservation Plan

ARTICLE VI: SITE PLAN REVIEW

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Kalama has many areas of timberland and open areas inside its City limits adjacent to residential areas;

Checklists. Project Name: Location: File Number: Date of Submittal: Reviewer: Date: Applicant: Contact Name: Phone Number:

CROWN POINT SUBDIVISION

17.18 SENSITIVE AREAS

Rural Land Use Designations Kittitas County December 6, 2007 Draft

O l so n M e morial Highway, S t e , G o l d e n V a l l e y, MN Delano Laketown Homes Concept Plan

Note: Staff reports can be accessed at Zone: I-3. Tier:

Note: Staff reports can be accessed at

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Division 13 Local Business and Industry Buffer Zone: Assessment Criteria and Assessment Tables

KASPER. City of Georgetown, Texas PUD Planned Unit Development. December 30, 2015 Revised January 27, 2016

Santa Cruz River Master Plan. Presented to the Arizona Floodplain Management Association Spring Conference June 8-10, 2011

2. Would the proposed project comply with the Land Use map? 3. Would the proposed project require a rezoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning district?

Example Codes. City of Brentwood, Tennessee Brentwood Hillside Protection Overlay District Summary

Richton Park Western Development Corridor Green Infrastructure Development Plan August 18, 2017

APPENDIX C. Architectural and Environmental Design Standards. Environmentally sensitive areas should be protected.

Planning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008

ARTICLE 13 STREETS General

Description of Preferred Alternative

R E S O L U T I O N. Single-Family Residence/ Church. 2,488 sq. ft. 2,488 sq. ft. Area Parking Required: Church

INTEGRATING NATURAL RESOURCES INTO A DEVELOPMENT, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ROLES

Town of Washington Master Plan & Regulatory Audit: Interim Results

GENERAL INFORMATIONaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Regulation Changes for Open Space and Similar Uses

CHAPTER FIVE COMMUNITY DESIGN

Section 9 NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN


Woodland Conservation and the Master Plan

APPENDIX A 20 PROCESS GUIDE AND CHECKLIST FOR VILLAGE MIXED USE REZONINGS, MASTER PLANS AND CUP S CARRBORO DEVELOPMENT GUIDE APPENDIX A

The Rootstown Township Zoning Commission met in a public hearing on Tuesday September 6, 2016, at 7 p.m. at Rootstown Town Hall.

Application Number: SD Project Name: Walton Farms Preliminary Subdivision (acting as Master Plan)

Minnesota Department of Natural Resource - Natural Resource Guidance Checklist Conserving Natural Resources through Density Bonuses

ARTICLE 9: LANDSCAPING AND FENCING REQUIREMENTS

Transcription:

6 CONCEPTUAL PRELIMINARY PLAN GUIDE AND CHECKLIST FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS Conceptual Preliminary Guide/Checklist for Major Subdivisions Page 1

FORM: REVIEW DATE: CONCEPTUAL PLAN REVIEW 2000 REVIEWED BY: REVIEW #: PROJECT NAME: DATE OF PREVIOUS REVIEW: CONCEPTUAL PRELIMINARY PLAN GUIDE AND CHECKLIST FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS (All Subdivision Projects Requiring a CUP or SUP) PRELIMINARY INFORMATION/ELEMENTS (Address all Items and Elements) 1. HOLD A PRESUBMITTAL CONFERENCE WITH TOWN STAFF a. Attend a meeting with Town Staff at Development Review. b. We will discuss the information necessary to proceed with the Site Analysis Plan, the walk-about and the 4-step approach to designing subdivisions, all of which will yield your Conceptual Preliminary Plan. 2. SUBMIT A SITE ANALYSIS PLAN DRAWN TO SCALE [SECTION 15-50]. Please submit three (3) standard size and twenty (20) reduced size (11 x 17 ) sets of site analysis plan. The site analysis plan must contain the following elements: a. Name and address of the proposed developer. b. Name and location of the proposed project. c. Vicinity map showing the location of the proposed project in relation to the surrounding street network. d. Acreage of the tract/lot proposed for development. e. Topo lines for the project site (USGS or field shot/verified). f. Location of primary and secondary constraints [Section 15-198(b)(4&5)]. g. Location of any existing or proposed road connections from adjacent properties (existing street stub-outs or streets proposed on the Town s Connector Road Plan) 3. SCHEDULE AN ON-SITE WALK-ABOUT WITH ZONING DIVISION FOLLOWING SUBMITTAL OF SITE ANALYSIS PLAN [Section 15-50(c)] Walk-abouts are tentatively scheduled for the first (1 st ) and third (3 rd ) Thursdays of each month. In order to be placed on the schedule for a walkabout, all information requested above must be submitted and a written request must be received by the preceding walk-about date (i.e., to have a third (3 rd ) Thursday walk-about, you must have all information to the Zoning Division by the first (1 st ) Thursday). a. The purpose of the walk-about is to familiarize Town officials with the property s special features and to provide an informal opportunity for an Conceptual Preliminary Guide/Checklist for Major Subdivisions Page 2

interchange of information and idea s about the developer s plans and the Town s requirements. 4. SUBMIT THE CONCEPTUAL PRELIMINARY PLAN [Section 15 50(f)]. Upon completion of items 1 through 3 above, the developer shall submit a Conceptual Preliminary Plan prepared in accordance with the four (4) step approach outlined below and in Section 15-50(f) of the LUO. Please note that this plan shall constitute a preliminarily engineered sketch plan shown to illustrate initial thoughts about conceptual layouts for open space, house sites and street alignments. As a result, changes in layout are more easily accommodated since heavy engineering costs have not been incurred. Each step should be shown as a separate plan sheet, with each new step building upon the previous step(s) [i.e., step #4 should show the information from all four (4) steps]. The four (4) steps are as follows: a) For the first step (Step #1), show all primary and secondary conservation areas (as show on the site analysis, as modified during the walk-about ). Additionally, show the recommended 100 primary constraint setback and the recommended 50 secondary constraint setback. b) In the second step (Step #2), potential home sites, open space site, recreation sites, etc. are tentatively located using bubble diagrams to represent the various pods. Please remember that all house sites should generally be located 100 from all primary constraints and 50 from all secondary constraints. c) The third step (Step #3) consists of aligning proposed streets through the various pods to provide vehicular access to each home site pod. The proposed streets should connect to existing connection points or provide stub-outs for future connections, per Section 15-217(a) of the LUO. Please examine the Town s Connector Roads Policy for other possible planned/anticipated street connections across the subject property. Additionally, the street alignments should: 1. Avoid/minimize adverse impacts to primary/secondary constraints; 2. Avoid wetlands and excessively steep slopes (over 15%). d) The fourth step (Step #4) consists of drawing in conceptual lot lines. Please note that the number of lots will be based on the adjusted tract acreage provisions found in Section 15-182.3 of the LUO. 5. SUBMIT DOCUMENTATION DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN OBJECTIVES OF THE LUO [Section 15-50(g)] The Conceptual Preliminary Plan shall demonstrate an attempt to satisfy the design objectives of 15-50(g)(1-14) of the LUO. Please note that on some projects, certain design objectives will not apply, while on other projects, some of the design objectives will be in direct conflict. As a result, please provide a Design Narrative explaining the design choices that were made and how the project meets the intent of the design process [including any justifications for any compromises or design decisions made]. a) Protects and preserves all floodplains, wetlands, and steep slopes from clearing, grading, filling, or construction (except as may be approved by Conceptual Preliminary Guide/Checklist for Major Subdivisions Page 3

the Town for essential infrastructure or active or passive recreation amenities). b) Preserves and maintains mature woodlands, existing fields, pastures, meadows, and orchards, and creates sufficient buffer areas to minimize conflicts between residential and agricultural uses. For example, locating houselots and driveways within wooded areas is generally recommended, with two exceptions. The first involves significant wildlife habitat or mature woodlands which raise an equal or greater preservation concern, ad described in #5 and #8 below. The second involves predominantly agricultural areas, where remnant tree groups provide the only natural areas for wildlife habitat. c) If development must be located on open fields or pastures because of greater constraints in all other parts of the site, dwellings should be sited on the least prime agricultural soils, or in locations at the far edge of a field, as seen from existing public roads. Other considerations include whether the development will be visually buffered from existing public roads, such as by a planting screen consisting of a variety of indigenous native trees, shrubs and wildflowers (specifications for which should be based upon a close examination of the distribution and frequency of those species, found in a typical nearby roadside verge or hedgerow). d) Maintains or creates an upland buffer of natural native species vegetation of at least 100 feet in depth adjacent to wetlands and surface waters, including creeks, streams, springs, lakes and ponds. e) Designs around existing hedgerows and treelines between fields or meadows. Minimizes impacts on large woodlands (greater than five acres), especially those containing many mature trees or a significant wildlife habitat, or those not degraded by invasive vines. Also, woodlands of any size on highly erodible soils with slopes greater than 10 percent should be avoided. However, woodlands in poor condition with limited management potential can provide suitable location for residential development. When any woodland is developed, great care shall be taken to design all disturbed areas (for buildings, roads, yards, septic disposal field, etc) in locations where there are no large trees or obvious wildlife areas, to the fullest extent that is practicable. f) Leaves scenic views and vistas unblocked or uninterrupted, particularly as seen from public roadways. (For example, in open agrarian landscapes, a deep, no-build, no-plant buffer is recommended along the public roadway where those views or vistas are prominent or locally significant. In wooded areas where the sense of enclosure is a feature that should be maintained, a deep no-build, no-cut buffer should be respected, to preserve existing vegetation. g) Avoids siting new construction on prominent hilltops or ridges, by taking advantage of lower topographic features. h) Protects wildlife habitat areas of special species listed as endangered, threatened, or of special concern by the state or federal government. i) Designs around and preserves sites of historic, archaeological, or cultural value, and their environs, insofar as needed to safeguard the character of the feature, including stone walls, spring houses, barn foundations, cellar holes, earthworks, burial grounds, etc. j) Protects rural roadside character and improves public safety and vehicular carrying capacity by avoiding development fronting onto Conceptual Preliminary Guide/Checklist for Major Subdivisions Page 4

existing public roads. Establishes buffer zones along the scenic corridor of rural roads with historic buildings, stone walls, hedgerows, etc. k) Landscapes common areas (such as community greens), and both sides of new streets with native specie shade trees and flowering shrubs with high wildlife conservation value. l) Provides active recreational areas in suitable locations offering convenient access by residents, & screened from nearby houselots. m) Includes a pedestrian circulation system designed to assure that pedestrians can walk safely and easily on the site, between properties and activities or special features within the neighborhood open space system. All roadside footpaths should connect with off-road trails, which in turn should link with potential open space on adjoining undeveloped parcels (or with existing open space on adjoining developed parcels). n) Provides open space that is reasonably contiguous, and whose configuration is in accordance with the guidelines contained in the Design and Management Handbook for Preservation Areas, produced by the Natural Lands Trust (available in the Planning Department). For example, fragmentation of open space should be minimized so that these resource areas are not divided into numerous small parcels located in various parts of the development. To the greatest extent practic able, this land shall be designed as a single block with logical, straightforward boundaries. Long thin strips of conservation land shall be avoided, unless the conservation feature is linear or unless such configuration is necessary to connect with other streams or trails. The open space shall generally abut existing or potential open space land on adjacent parcels, and shall be designed as part of larger, contiguous, and integrated greenway systems, as per the policies in the Open Space and Recreation section of the Town s Ordinance. 6. STAFF REVIEW AND FURTHER SUBMITTALS/INFORMATION Staff will review the proposed Conceptual Preliminary Plan for compliance with each of the four (4) steps and the Design Narrative explaining how the proposed project complies with each of the fourteen (14) design objectives. If staff is satisfied with the information submitted, you will receive a letter informing you that the project may proceed to the heavy engineering portion of the project design. Please see the Standard Subdivision Checklist available in the Zoning Division for specific plan and submittal requirements. If any changes are needed to the Conceptual Preliminary Plan or the Design Narrative, you will receive a letter informing you of the necessary changes. Once the requested changes have been completed, please resubmit the packet to the Town for further review. NOTE: THIS CHECKLIST IS INTENDED TO SERVE AS A GUIDE FOR PREPARING SITE PLANS FOR REVIEW BY THE TOWN OF CARRBORO AND IT SUPPLEMENTS THE TOWN S LAND USE ORDINANCE. EACH APPLICATION MUST COMPLY WITH ALL LAND USE ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS, NOT JUST THE CHECKLIST Conceptual Preliminary Guide/Checklist for Major Subdivisions Page 5