Memorandum. Introduction

Similar documents
Andrew Nichols Remediation Division Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155

LAB ID and/or LABORATORY NAME: ASSESSOR NAME: ALPHA TRACK. Method Number: ELAP method number SOP Number: Revision Number: SOP Date:

WATER QUALITY TESTING FOR SCHAUMBURG COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT 54 HOOVER SCHAUMBURG, ILLINOIS OCTOBER 3, 2017 PROJECT NUMBER:

C-NRPP Quality Assurance Guidance for Radon Test Devices

Siloxanes: Quantifying a New Emergent Pollutant in Water, Air and Soil

CHARCOAL CANISTER (Activated Charcoal Adsorption Device) by Proportional Counting

LAB ID and/or LABORATORY NAME: ASSESSOR NAME: ELECTRET by Voltametry. Method Number: ELAP method number SOP Number: Revision Number: SOP Date:

Comprehensive Short-Term Radon Survey Report

Quality Assurance/ Quality Control. Topic 4 - Audio 46. Key Points

Radon Detection Specialists, Inc.

Certificate of Completion

Process and Air Monitoring. Online GC systems for continuous monitoring of organic compounds in air and gaseous samples

Imagine the result. Dear Ms. Vanderlaan:

Certificate of Completion

Certificate of Completion

Radon Detection Specialists, Inc. Love the Lungs You re With

Radon Detection Specialists, Inc. Love the Lungs You re With

C-NRPP Quality Control and Quality Assurance Manual for Radon Sampling and Analysis conducted by Radon Measurement Professionals and Laboratories

RADON SCREENING SURVEY FOLLOW-UP SPRINGBROOK HIGH SCHOOL

Radon Detection Specialists, Inc.

RADON PLAN. Eugene School District 4J Facilities Management 715 West Fourth Avenue Eugene, OR

Radon Measurement Survey Report. McKnight School Service Center 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Radon Detection Specialists, Inc.

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Waldo Middle School 56 Jackson Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Field Validation of an On-Line FTIR Analyzer for Measuring Total Siloxane Content in Landfill Gas

Automated Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) of EPA Method 1694 for Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in Large Volume Water Samples

Radon Detection Specialists, Inc.

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Rollins Elementary School 950 Kane Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Quality Assurance Plan for Conducting Radon Measurements

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Oak Park Elementary School 1200 Front Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Woodlin Elementary School Date of Report March 14, 2018

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Fred Rodgers Magnet Academy 501 College Avenue Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Evaluation of the Incon TS-LLD Line Leak Detection System

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Krug Elementary School 240 Melrose Avenue Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Adjustable Back Pressure Flow Controller Instructions

Radon Detection Specialists, Inc.

Ohio Department of Health, Bureau of Environmental Health and Radiation Protection, Radon Licensing Program. School Radon Testing Checklist

ALL RADON TESTS WERE SIGNIFICANLY BELOW

CHAPTER 240. RADON CERTIFICATION

Evaluation of the Red Jacket Fx1, Fx2, Fx1V and Fx2V Line Leak Detectors For Hourly Monitoring on Rigid Pipelines. Final Report


Bethel School District Radon Testing Plan

RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR RADON CONTROL

SENTRY-MS Mono-static Multi-gas Open Path Analyzer

MW-401B Area Soil Remediation Report

Title: Standard Operating Procedure for Measurement of Total Hydrocarbon Using a Flame Ionization Detection

SOP SF SOP for LN2 Freezers

RADON SCREENING SURVEY FOLLOW-UP GREAT SENECA CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Dairymaid Drive, Germantown, Maryland 20874

Environmental Resources Group, LLC (ERG) has completed the Radon Testing for the referenced property in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

MAINTENANCE AND TESTING OF FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS

Radon Testing and Reporting Plan. Tillamook School District #9 Tillamook, Oregon

COMPLIANCE INSPECTION CHECKLIST. Date: 12/20/12 Time In: 1:00PM Time Out: 1:30PM

ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY

2.3 Definitions, General Provisions, and Radon Standards

900 S. Colorado Blvd. - 5,609 square ft building (new automobile sales showroom and offices) built in 2000/2001; and

RADON SCREENING SURVEY FOLLOW-UP CONCORD CENTER Hidden Creek Rd, Bethesda, Maryland 20817

MCPS RADON TESTING. Executive Summary: Festival Center. Date of Test Report: 4/15/2016 Round of Testing: Initial Follow-up Post Remediation

Emissioni convogliate in atmosfera: Sistemi di monitoraggio in continuo delle emissioni SME

Saying Mahalo to Solar Savings: A Billing Analysis of Solar Water Heaters in Hawaii

Datalogging as standard

RADON SCREENING SURVEY FOLLOW-UP WHITTIER WOODS CENTER Whittier Boulevard, Bethesda, Maryland 20817

Specifications for Fluorocarbon Refrigerants

OPEN PATH DETECTION OF ACROLEIN LEAKS

A D D E N D U M N O. 1 To The Contract Documents Date: Project: Facilities Development & Planning Portable Building Relocation

Multnomah Education Service District

Brine Generation Study

POLICY. Carbon Monoxide (CO) is an odorless, colorless gas that can cause sudden illness and death. 1

OBSERVATIONS AND RESPONSES

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

intrinsically safe detector for hydrocarbon gases

Displacement Ventilation in Classrooms

The Louis Berger Group, Inc. 15 January 2016

A Notification under Article 12 of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 1

ATTACHMENT L. Provision C.3.c.i.(1)(b)(vi) Specification of soils for Biotreatment or Bioretention Facilities

Results of Vacuum Attachment Efficiency Evaluation MBX Bristle Blaster Power Tool Dust Collection System KTA Project No

UV Sentry. Cost Effective Perimeter & LDAR Monitoring. ...Precise, Species Specific Fugitive Emissions Quantification

Specifications for Fluorocarbon Refrigerants

CHARCOAL CANISTER RADON SURVEY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN

d. Portable water heaters used exclusively for underwater diving operations.

FORM ACCL-PC1 ACCL WITNESS TEST PROCEDURE AND CHECKLIST

SAMPLE SPECIFICATIONS CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEM (Insitu)

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Turn-Key Environmental Consultants, Inc. 790 Barnhart Rd. 714 Monument Ave. Phone: Troy, OH Dayton, OH Fax:

2009 International Fire Code Errata. SECOND PRINTING (Posted April 6, 2010)

STUDY #3 IN A SERIES OF REPORTS ON RADON IN BC HOMES. Castlegar: COMMUNITY-WIDE RADON TESTING RESULTS AS PART OF ITS. PROGRAm

Indoor Air Quality Testing. Horry County Schools

Lead in Priority Area Sampling Report Naval Air Station Patuxent River

SIEMENS ULTRAMAT 6 IR CARBON MONOXIDE ANALYZER METHOD VALIDATION FOR TESTING CARBON MONOXIDE IN NITROGEN, NF

Failure Modes, Effects and Diagnostic Analysis

Silicon-Lined Canister Cleaning Practices and Blank VOC Concentrations. Jason S. Herrington, Gary Stidsen, Trent Sprenkle, Steve Kozel

Specification of Soils for Biotreatment or Bioretention Facilities

Can Short Term ARRA Stimulus Funding Achieve Long Term Market Transformation? 1

Emis. Unit Description:

COMPLIANCE INSPECTION CHECKLIST. Date: 5/14/2011 Time In: 12:30PM Time Out: 1:00PM

Conducting and Assessing Radon Surveys in Schools & Commercial Buildings

1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA

Advancing the power of SPE. Intelligent Automated Solid Phase Extraction. SmartPrep Brochure

PRODUCT CONFORMITY CERTIFICATE

Advancing the power of SPE. Intelligent Automated Solid Phase Extraction. SmartPrep Brochure

Soil and Plant Methods List for Automated Ion Analyzers. Flow Injection Analysis

Transcription:

5670 Greenwood Plaza Blvd Suite 540 Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 PH 720.509.8901 www.geosyntec.com Memorandum Date: November 1, 2017 To: CC: From: Kelly Weidenbach, Natrona County Health Department (NCHD) Doug Tunison, Dennis Bay, Natrona County School District#1 (NCSD #1) Joe Nicholas, FDL Operating, LLC Dave Folkes, Eric Lovenduski, Geosyntec Anne Woodland and Stephen Foster, Geosyntec Subject: Summary of Quarterly Air Quality Sampling Data from October 7, 2017, Collected at the Midwest School, Midwest, Wyoming, with an Operational Mitigation System. Introduction The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the quarterly air quality sampling results conducted on October 7, at the Midwest School, Midwest, Wyoming. The previous four, monthly rounds of air quality sampling were conducted on April 3, May 15, June 23 and July 25. The sampling frequency changed from monthly to quarterly after the July sampling event. The results were compared to action levels presented in the approved Indoor Air Monitoring Plan (IAMP), and the results for all samples were below the action levels for all analytes. Consistent with the approved IAMP and the past four, monthly sampling rounds, six indoor air and two outdoor air samples were collected on October 7, from the locations shown on Figure 1 of the IAMP. In addition, one sample was collected from Room 105, based largely on the presence of an unidentified smell in that room. The samples were collected over a period of eight hours, and are intended to represent air quality during a school day. The samples were submitted to Eurofins Air Toxics Laboratory for analysis. The quarterly sampling event was changed from the original scheduled date of October 21 to October 7, based on the presence of an unidentified smell in Room 105, and fluctuations in carbon dioxide concentrations. (Note that the October 4 memorandum summarizes the issues surrounding Room 105.) Students were moved out of that classroom on Wednesday September 20, and the classroom remains closed to students at this time. In addition, one fan on the mitigation system, fan F3 controlling suction points SP-10 and SP-11, was not working at the time of the October 7 1

Midwest School Project October Air Sampling Results air sampling, and replacement of the fan was anticipated. The fan was restarted the following week and continues to work at this time, and the school has a new fan as a spare. Carbon Dioxide As a separate task that arose since school resumed in August, weekly reviews of the carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations at the school have been conducted over the last five weeks, in order to determine whether trends are identifiable. (CO2 data are not included in this memorandum.) Subsequent to the October 7 air sampling event, the audible and email alarms on the CO2 monitoring system were activated. As such, a weekly review of the CO2 data is no longer necessary. Any exceedances of the 1,000 or 1,500 ppm CO2 limit that aren t resolved within an hour or two will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Laboratory Data Quality Review The Eurofins Air Toxics Laboratory data package of results was received on October 27, and reviewed by Geosyntec in accordance with the items specified in Section 4 of the IAMP, including criteria such as the sample holding time, and quality control items, including blank sample quality, laboratory control sample quality, and surrogate recoveries to determine sample quality. The data package review revealed that all items were acceptable and within the stated acceptance limits, as discussed below. The chain of custody (COC) was reviewed to ensure that the samples were accurately labeled, handled and tracked from the sampling location to the analyzing laboratory, and to verify that the final canister pressures were within the acceptable range for analysis. The samples were collected on October 7 and analyzed on October 18, indicating that the standard holding time of 30 days or less was met. The laboratory indicated that there was no sample identification on the canister tag for Weather Station, however they were able to obtain the sample ID from the chain of custody. The initial canister vacuum readings and final pressures were sufficient to meet the project reporting limits. The laboratory method blank is used to determine whether background contamination exists at the laboratory. The method blank was non-detect for all analytes. Surrogate compounds are added to each sample prior to analysis to evaluate overall laboratory performance and the efficiency of the analytical technique. The surrogate recoveries were within acceptable limits for all samples. The laboratory control sample and duplicate are used to assess the accuracy and precision of the analytical method, and the results must fall within a stated range. The percent recoveries on the laboratory control sample and duplicate were within the acceptable limits, and the relative percent difference between the two samples was acceptable. The field duplicate is used to assess the overall precision of the field sampling procedures and analytical method, and to assess the variability within one location. For analytes detected in both 2

Midwest School Project October Air Sampling Results samples, the relative percent difference between the two results is calculated and should generally be less than 50 percent. A field duplicate was collected from the library, and that sample was labeled BD-100717. The results were non-detect for the analytes in both samples. The relative percent difference is not calculated when one or more sample results are non-detect. Overall, the primary and field duplicate showed good agreement between the two samples. Results and Comparison of Data to Action Levels Table 1 summarizes the indoor and outdoor air sample results of monitoring with the operational vapor mitigation system, for all of the sampling rounds conducted to date. The indoor air data from the October sampling event are compared with the approved action levels presented in the IAMP for each chemical; summarized in Table 1. The comparison indicates that all indoor air results are below the corresponding action levels. The outdoor air sample results provide an indication of the potential impacts of outdoor air on indoor air quality. The outdoor air samples from October are non-detect for all analytes. All compounds were non-detect in October, except for the following: Concentrations of toluene were non-detect in six of the seven locations sampled. A toluene concentration of 0.94 µg/m 3 was reported in the Preschool; this result is well below the action level of 3,800 µg/m 3. Conclusion These data indicate that indoor air quality meets the action levels specified in the IAMP for all samples collected during the second quarterly sampling event in October 2017, at the Midwest school. The data collected from April through October indicate that the concentrations in the building are relatively homogenous and currently appear consistent from one month to the next. Consistent with the approved IAMP, air sampling will continue on a quarterly basis, with an approximate date of January 13, 2018 for the next sampling round. This date may shift slightly, based on scheduling availability of TriHydro. Sampling will continue in the original locations; based on the October results for Room 105, no further sampling is warranted in that location. In addition, weekly reviews of the CO2 data are no longer necessary, because the audible and email alarm systems were activated. To the extent possible, contractors and employees conducting abatement and repair/refurbishing activities should provide the school district with a list of chemicals, commercial products and 3

Midwest School Project October Air Sampling Results activities to help minimize, or at least to understand the potential for adverse impacts on future air quality sample results due to remodeling. 4

Table 1. Midwest School Indoor and Outdoor Air Concentrations April to October, 2017 Location Sample Date Benzene Ethylbenzene m,p-xylene o-xylene 1,2,3- Trimethylbenzene 1,2,4- Trimethylbenzene 1,3,5- Trimethylbenzene October Results Indoor Samples (µg/m3) Library 10/7/2017 <0.66 <0.78 <0.89 <0.89 <0.89 <5.1 <1.0 <1.0 Duplicate (Library) (BD 100717) 10/7/2017 <0.69 <0.82 <0.94 <0.94 <0.94 <5.3 <1.1 <1.1 Room 101 10/7/2017 <0.64 <0.76 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <4.9 <0.99 <0.99 Pool 10/7/2017 <0.68 <0.80 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <5.2 <1.0 <1.0 Preschool 10/7/2017 <0.66 0.94 <0.89 <0.89 <0.89 <5.1 <1.0 <1.0 Kitchen 10/7/2017 <0.64 <0.76 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <4.9 <0.99 <0.99 Room 105 10/7/2017 <0.66 <0.78 <0.89 <0.89 <0.89 <5.1 <1.0 <1.0 Outdoor Samples (µg/m3) Swingset 10/7/2017 <0.69 <0.82 <0.94 <0.94 <0.94 <5.3 <1.1 <1.1 Weather Station 10/7/2017 <0.68 <0.80 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <5.2 <1.0 <1.0 Action Levels (µg/m3) 9.6 3,800 260 220 220 22 31 22 July Results Indoor Samples (µg/m3) Library 7/25/2017 <0.66 1.0 <0.9 <0.9 <0.9 <5.1 <1.0 <1.0 Duplicate (Library) (BD 7-25) 7/25/2017 0.66 0.98 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <4.8 <0.96 <0.96 Room 101 7/25/2017 1.2 1.8 <0.83 1.1 <0.83 <4.7 <0.94 <0.94 Pool 7/25/2017 1.1 2.1 <0.89 2.1 <0.89 <5.1 <1.0 <1.0 Preschool 7/25/2017 0.71 1.2 <0.82 <0.82 <0.82 <4.6 <0.92 <0.92 Kitchen 7/25/2017 <0.66 1.2 <0.90 <0.90 <0.90 <5.1 <1.0 <1.0 Outdoor Samples (µg/m3) Swingset 7/25/2017 <0.64 0.79 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <4.9 <0.98 <0.98 Weather Station 7/25/2017 <0.63 <0.74 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <4.8 <0.96 <0.96 Action Levels (µg/m3) 9.6 3,800 260 220 220 22 31 22 June Results Indoor Samples (µg/m3) Library 6/23/2017 <0.66 <0.78 <0.89 <0.89 <0.89 <5.1 <1.0 <1.0 Duplicate (Library) 6/23/2017 <0.64 <0.76 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <4.9 <0.99 <0.99 Room 101 6/23/2017 <0.63 <0.74 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <4.8 <0.96 <0.96 Pool 6/23/2017 <0.64 1.2 <0.87 1.0 <0.87 <4.9 <0.99 <0.99 Preschool 6/23/2017 <0.61 <0.72 <0.83 <0.83 <0.83 <4.7 <0.94 <0.94 Kitchen 6/23/2017 <0.64 5.5 <0.87 1.8 <0.87 <4.9 <0.99 <0.99 Outdoor Samples (µg/m3) Weather Station 6/23/2017 <0.63 <0.74 <0.85 <0.85 <0.85 <4.8 <0.96 <0.96 Swingset 6/23/2017 <0.61 <0.72 <0.83 <0.83 <0.83 <4.7 <0.94 <0.94 Action Levels (µg/m3) 9.6 3,800 260 220 220 22 31 22 May Results Indoor Samples (µg/m3) Library 5/15/2017 <0.69 <0.81 <0.94 <0.94 <0.94 <5.3 <1.1 <1.1 Duplicate (Library) 5/15/2017 <0.67 1.3 <0.91 0.98 <0.91 <5.2 <1.0 <1.0 Room 101 5/15/2017 <0.68 1.2 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <5.2 <1.0 <1.0 Pool 5/15/2017 0.98 <0.82 <0.95 <0.95 <0.95 <5.4 <1.1 <1.1 Preschool 5/15/2017 <0.66 <0.78 <0.90 <0.90 <0.90 <5.1 <1.0 <1.0 5

Table 1. Midwest School Indoor and Outdoor Air Concentrations April to October, 2017 Location Sample Date Benzene Ethylbenzene m,p-xylene o-xylene 1,2,3-1,2,4-1,3,5- Trimethylbenzene Trimethylbenzene Trimethylbenzene Kitchen 5/15/2017 <0.67 2.2 <0.91 <0.91 <0.91 <5.2 <1.0 <1.0 Outdoor Samples (µg/m3) Weather Station 5/15/2017 <0.69 <0.82 <0.94 <0.94 <0.94 <5.3 <1.1 <1.1 Swingset 5/15/2017 <0.68 <0.80 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <5.2 <1.0 <1.0 Action Levels (µg/m3) 9.6 3,800 260 220 220 22 31 22 April Results Indoor Samples (µg/m3) Library 4/3/2017 0.75 <0.78 <0.90 <0.90 <0.90 <5.1 1.7 <1.0 Room 101 4/3/2017 <0.61 <0.72 <0.82 <0.82 <0.82 <4.7 0.99 <0.93 Boys Locker Room 4/3/2017 0.77 <0.73 <0.84 1.30 <0.84 <4.7 <0.95 <0.95 Pool Crawl Space 4/3/2017 <0.69 <0.81 <0.93 <0.93 <0.93 <5.3 6.2 2.6 Preschool 4/3/2017 0.64 <0.75 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <4.9 2.7 1.5 Boiler Room 4/3/2017 0.63 J <0.76 <0.87 1.0 <0.87 <4.9 12 6.8 Outdoor Samples (µg/m3) Weather Station 4/3/2017 <0.64 <0.76 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <4.9 <0.99 <0.99 Swingset 4/3/2017 1.0 <0.75 <0.87 <0.87 <0.87 <4.9 <0.98 <0.98 Action Levels (µg/m3) 9.6 3,800 260 220 220 22 31 22 Notes: Detected analytes are highlighted. Action levels originate from the Indoor Air Monitoring Plan and were approved by the Natrona County Health Department. Non-detected chemicals are shown as "<" followed by the reporting limit, which is specific to each sample collected, and varies with the final canister pressure. J - an estimated value that is detected below the reporting limit Benzene value of 9.6 µg/m3 corresponds to the ATSDR Chronic MRL (ATSDR 2017) Action levels for toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes correspond to the ATSDR Chronic MRL (ATSDR 2017) Action levels for 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene are based on the RSLs for Industrial exposure (EPA 2016), because there are no ATSDR Chronic MRLs. Action level for 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene is based on 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene. 6

10/27/2017 Mr. Joe Nicholas FDL Operating, LLC 38250 North Gas Plant Rd., Country 131 PO Box 10 Midwest WY 82643 Project Name: Midwest School Project #: 44W-001-002 Workorder #: 1710193 Dear Mr. Joe Nicholas The following report includes the data for the above referenced project for sample(s) received on 10/10/2017 at Air Toxics Ltd. The data and associated QC analyzed by Modified TO-15 are compliant with the project requirements or laboratory criteria with the exception of the deviations noted in the attached case narrative. Thank you for choosing Eurofins Air Toxics Inc. for your air analysis needs. Eurofins Air Toxics Inc. is committed to providing accurate data of the highest quality. Please feel free to contact the Project Manager: Brian Whittaker at 916-985-1000 if you have any questions regarding the data in this report. Regards, Brian Whittaker Project Manager Page 1 of 19

WORK ORDER #: 1710193 Work Order Summary CLIENT: PHONE: FAX: DATE RECEIVED: 10/10/2017 DATE COMPLETED: 10/21/2017 Mr. Joe Nicholas FDL Operating, LLC 38250 North Gas Plant Rd., Country 131 PO Box 10 Midwest, WY 82643 307-437-9480 BILL TO: P.O. # PROJECT # CONTACT: Mr. Joe Nicholas FDL Operating, LLC 38250 North Gas Plant Rd., Country 131 PO Box 10 Midwest, WY 82643 44W-001-002 Midwest School Brian Whittaker RECEIPT FRACTION # NAME TEST VAC./PRES. FINAL PRESSURE 01A Library Modified TO-15 10.5 "Hg 5 psi 02A BD-100717 Modified TO-15 11.5 "Hg 5 psi 03A Room 101 Modified TO-15 10.0 "Hg 5 psi 04A Pool Modified TO-15 11.0 "Hg 5 psi 05A Room 105 Modified TO-15 10.5 "Hg 5 psi 06A Preschool Modified TO-15 10.5 "Hg 5 psi 07A Kitchen Modified TO-15 10.0 "Hg 5 psi 08A Weather Station Modified TO-15 11.0 "Hg 5 psi 09A Swingset Modified TO-15 11.5 "Hg 5 psi 10A Lab Blank Modified TO-15 NA NA 11A CCV Modified TO-15 NA NA 12A LCS Modified TO-15 NA NA 12AA LCSD Modified TO-15 NA NA CERTIFIED BY: DATE: 10/21/17 Technical Director Certification numbers: AZ Licensure AZ0775, NJ NELAP - CA016, NY NELAP - 11291, TX NELAP - T104704434-16-11, UT NELAP CA0093332016-7, VA NELAP - 8113, WA NELAP - C935 Name of Accreditation Body: NELAP/ORELAP (Oregon Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program) Accreditation number: CA300005, Effective date: 10/18/2016, Expiration date: 10/17/2017. Eurofins Air Toxics Inc.. certifies that the test results contained in this report meet all requirements of the NELAC standards This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Eurofins Air Toxics, Inc. 180 BLUE RAVINE ROAD, SUITE B FOLSOM, CA - 95630 (916) 985-1000. (800) 985-5955. FAX (916) 985-1020 Page 2 of 19

LABORATORY NARRATIVE Modified TO-15 FDL Operating, LLC Workorder# 1710193 Nine 6 Liter Summa Canister samples were received on October 10, 2017. The laboratory performed analysis via modified EPA TO-15 using GC/MS in the full scan mode. This workorder was independently validated prior to submittal using 'USEPA National Functional Guidelines' as generally applied to the analysis of volatile organic compounds in air. A rules-based, logic driven, independent validation engine was employed to assess completeness, evaluate pass/fail of relevant project quality control requirements and verification of all quantified amounts. modifications taken to run these samples are summarized in the table below. Specific project requirements may over-ride the ATL modifications. Requirement TO-15 Initial Calibration </=30% RSD with 2 compounds allowed out to < 40% RSD ATL Modifications </=30% RSD with 4 compounds allowed out to < 40% RSD Blank and standards Zero Air UHP Nitrogen provides a higher purity gas matrix than zero air Receiving Notes Sample identification for sample Weather Station was not provided on the sample tag. Therefore the information on the Chain of Custody was used to process and report the sample. Analytical Notes The reported CCV for each daily batch may be derived from more than one analytical file due to the client's request for non-standard compounds. Non-standard compounds may have different acceptance criteria than the standard TO-14A/TO-15 compound list as per contract or verbal agreement. Definition of Data Qualifying Flags Eight qualifiers may have been used on the data analysis sheets and indicates as follows: B - present in laboratory blank greater than reporting limit (background subtraction not performed). J - Estimated value. E - Exceeds instrument calibration range. S - Saturated peak. Q - Exceeds quality control limits. U - analyzed for but not detected above the reporting limit, LOD, or MDL value. See data page for project specific U-flag definition. UJ- Non-detected compound associated with low bias in the CCV N - The identification is based on presumptive evidence. File extensions may have been used on the data analysis sheets and indicates as follows: a-file was requantified Page 3 of 19

b-file was quantified by a second column and detector r1-file was requantified for the purpose of reissue Page 4 of 19

Summary of Detected s Client Sample ID: Library Lab ID#: 1710193-01A No Detections Were Found. Client Sample ID: BD-100717 Lab ID#: 1710193-02A No Detections Were Found. Client Sample ID: Room 101 Lab ID#: 1710193-03A No Detections Were Found. Client Sample ID: Pool Lab ID#: 1710193-04A No Detections Were Found. Client Sample ID: Room 105 Lab ID#: 1710193-05A No Detections Were Found. Client Sample ID: Preschool Lab ID#: 1710193-06A 0.21 0.25 0.78 0.94 Client Sample ID: Kitchen Lab ID#: 1710193-07A No Detections Were Found. Client Sample ID: Weather Station Lab ID#: 1710193-08A No Detections Were Found. Page 5 of 19

Summary of Detected s Client Sample ID: Swingset Lab ID#: 1710193-09A No Detections Were Found. Page 6 of 19

File Name: v101807 Dil. Factor: 2.06 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Benzene Ethyl Benzene m,p-xylene o-xylene Client Sample ID: Library Lab ID#: 1710193-01A Date of Collection: 10/7/17 8:00:00 AM Date of Analysis: 10/18/17 01:44 PM 1.0 Not Detected 5.1 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 1.0 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 1.0 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.66 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.89 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.89 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.89 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.78 Not Detected Container Type: 6 Liter Summa Canister Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene 98 70-130 97 70-130 102 70-130 Page 7 of 19

File Name: v101808 Dil. Factor: 2.17 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Benzene Ethyl Benzene m,p-xylene o-xylene Client Sample ID: BD-100717 Lab ID#: 1710193-02A Date of Collection: 10/7/17 8:01:00 AM Date of Analysis: 10/18/17 02:23 PM 1.1 Not Detected 5.3 Not Detected 0.22 Not Detected 1.1 Not Detected 0.22 Not Detected 1.1 Not Detected 0.22 Not Detected 0.69 Not Detected 0.22 Not Detected 0.94 Not Detected 0.22 Not Detected 0.94 Not Detected 0.22 Not Detected 0.94 Not Detected 0.22 Not Detected 0.82 Not Detected Container Type: 6 Liter Summa Canister Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene 101 70-130 99 70-130 101 70-130 Page 8 of 19

File Name: v101810 Dil. Factor: 2.01 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Benzene Ethyl Benzene m,p-xylene o-xylene Client Sample ID: Room 101 Lab ID#: 1710193-03A Date of Collection: 10/7/17 8:08:00 AM Date of Analysis: 10/18/17 04:03 PM 1.0 Not Detected 4.9 Not Detected 0.20 Not Detected 0.99 Not Detected 0.20 Not Detected 0.99 Not Detected 0.20 Not Detected 0.64 Not Detected 0.20 Not Detected 0.87 Not Detected 0.20 Not Detected 0.87 Not Detected 0.20 Not Detected 0.87 Not Detected 0.20 Not Detected 0.76 Not Detected Container Type: 6 Liter Summa Canister Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene 97 70-130 98 70-130 101 70-130 Page 9 of 19

File Name: v101811 Dil. Factor: 2.12 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Benzene Ethyl Benzene m,p-xylene o-xylene Client Sample ID: Pool Lab ID#: 1710193-04A Date of Collection: 10/7/17 8:15:00 AM Date of Analysis: 10/18/17 04:38 PM 1.1 Not Detected 5.2 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 1.0 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 1.0 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.68 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.92 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.92 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.92 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.80 Not Detected Container Type: 6 Liter Summa Canister Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene 98 70-130 98 70-130 100 70-130 Page 10 of 19

File Name: v101812 Dil. Factor: 2.06 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Benzene Ethyl Benzene m,p-xylene o-xylene Client Sample ID: Room 105 Lab ID#: 1710193-05A Date of Collection: 10/7/17 8:23:00 AM Date of Analysis: 10/18/17 05:23 PM 1.0 Not Detected 5.1 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 1.0 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 1.0 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.66 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.89 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.89 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.89 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.78 Not Detected Container Type: 6 Liter Summa Canister Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99 70-130 100 70-130 103 70-130 Page 11 of 19

File Name: v101813 Dil. Factor: 2.06 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Benzene Ethyl Benzene m,p-xylene o-xylene Client Sample ID: Preschool Lab ID#: 1710193-06A Date of Collection: 10/7/17 8:32:00 AM Date of Analysis: 10/18/17 06:08 PM 1.0 Not Detected 5.1 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 1.0 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 1.0 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.66 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.89 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.89 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.89 Not Detected 0.21 0.25 0.78 0.94 Container Type: 6 Liter Summa Canister Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene 100 70-130 96 70-130 102 70-130 Page 12 of 19

File Name: v101814 Dil. Factor: 2.01 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Benzene Ethyl Benzene m,p-xylene o-xylene Client Sample ID: Kitchen Lab ID#: 1710193-07A Date of Collection: 10/7/17 8:34:00 AM Date of Analysis: 10/18/17 06:43 PM 1.0 Not Detected 4.9 Not Detected 0.20 Not Detected 0.99 Not Detected 0.20 Not Detected 0.99 Not Detected 0.20 Not Detected 0.64 Not Detected 0.20 Not Detected 0.87 Not Detected 0.20 Not Detected 0.87 Not Detected 0.20 Not Detected 0.87 Not Detected 0.20 Not Detected 0.76 Not Detected Container Type: 6 Liter Summa Canister Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene 102 70-130 97 70-130 106 70-130 Page 13 of 19

File Name: v101815 Dil. Factor: 2.12 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Benzene Ethyl Benzene m,p-xylene o-xylene Client Sample ID: Weather Station Lab ID#: 1710193-08A Date of Collection: 10/7/17 8:45:00 AM Date of Analysis: 10/18/17 07:18 PM 1.1 Not Detected 5.2 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 1.0 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 1.0 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.68 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.92 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.92 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.92 Not Detected 0.21 Not Detected 0.80 Not Detected Container Type: 6 Liter Summa Canister Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99 70-130 98 70-130 107 70-130 Page 14 of 19

File Name: v101816 Dil. Factor: 2.17 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Benzene Ethyl Benzene m,p-xylene o-xylene Client Sample ID: Swingset Lab ID#: 1710193-09A Date of Collection: 10/7/17 8:50:00 AM Date of Analysis: 10/18/17 07:54 PM 1.1 Not Detected 5.3 Not Detected 0.22 Not Detected 1.1 Not Detected 0.22 Not Detected 1.1 Not Detected 0.22 Not Detected 0.69 Not Detected 0.22 Not Detected 0.94 Not Detected 0.22 Not Detected 0.94 Not Detected 0.22 Not Detected 0.94 Not Detected 0.22 Not Detected 0.82 Not Detected Container Type: 6 Liter Summa Canister Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene 98 70-130 98 70-130 102 70-130 Page 15 of 19

File Name: v101806a Dil. Factor: 1.00 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Benzene Ethyl Benzene m,p-xylene o-xylene Client Sample ID: Lab Blank Lab ID#: 1710193-10A Date of Collection: NA Date of Analysis: 10/18/17 12:13 PM 0.50 Not Detected 2.4 Not Detected 0.10 Not Detected 0.49 Not Detected 0.10 Not Detected 0.49 Not Detected 0.10 Not Detected 0.32 Not Detected 0.10 Not Detected 0.43 Not Detected 0.10 Not Detected 0.43 Not Detected 0.10 Not Detected 0.43 Not Detected 0.10 Not Detected 0.38 Not Detected Container Type: NA - Not Applicable Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene 101 70-130 98 70-130 105 70-130 Page 16 of 19

Client Sample ID: CCV Lab ID#: 1710193-11A File Name: v101802 Dil. Factor: 1.00 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Benzene Ethyl Benzene m,p-xylene o-xylene Container Type: NA - Not Applicable Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene 84 97 94 100 100 96 98 102 Date of Collection: NA Date of Analysis: 10/18/17 08:37 AM 101 70-130 102 70-130 98 70-130 Page 17 of 19

Client Sample ID: LCS Lab ID#: 1710193-12A File Name: v101803 Dil. Factor: 1.00 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Benzene Ethyl Benzene m,p-xylene o-xylene Container Type: NA - Not Applicable Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene Date of Collection: NA Date of Analysis: 10/18/17 09:26 AM Not Spiked 104 70-130 99 70-130 104 70-130 109 70-130 101 70-130 108 70-130 108 70-130 101 70-130 101 70-130 100 70-130 Page 18 of 19

Client Sample ID: LCSD Lab ID#: 1710193-12AA File Name: v101804 Dil. Factor: 1.00 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Benzene Ethyl Benzene m,p-xylene o-xylene Container Type: NA - Not Applicable Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene Date of Collection: NA Date of Analysis: 10/18/17 10:16 AM Not Spiked 105 70-130 100 70-130 107 70-130 110 70-130 102 70-130 108 70-130 108 70-130 104 70-130 100 70-130 100 70-130 Page 19 of 19