Landmark Ordinance Task Force. Meeting 7 October 9, 2018

Similar documents
Landmark Ordinance Update Task Force. March 9, 2018

Review of Demolitions and Certificates of Non-Historic Status

Designation Information

Steering Committee Meeting

CITY OF GENEVA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 22 S. FIRST STREET GENEVA, ILLINOIS 60134

Historic Preservation Element

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Historic Resources. San Mateo has a Historic Building Survey that identified roughly 200 historically significant

HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES POLICIES

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Fredericksburg Historic Resources Survey

a) buildings, structures and artifacts of historical significance;

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

WHEREAS, a number of these buildings are potentially historic structures;

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

New Jersey and National Registers of Historic Places. Jonathan Kinney Senior Historic Preservation Specialist NJ Historic Preservation Office

Urban Design and Preservation Element

ABOUT HISTORIC DISTRICTS

Architectural Inventory Form

NEW CASTLE COUNTY S ZONING DISTRICTS

Hendersonville Historic Preservation Commission Main Street Local Historic District Design Guidelines

5.0 Historic Resource Survey

Architectural Inventory Form

Architectural Inventory Form

IMPORTANT NOTICE. Architectural Inventory Form COLORADO CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY I. IDENTIFICATION th Street 5WL.5601

Historic Resources. HORIZON Historic Resources

DRAFT FOR COMMENT: EASTLAKE AVENUE PEDESTRIAN DISTRICT OVERLAY ORDINANCE

Architectural Inventory Form

May 11, Re: Draft Environmental Impact Report for 6250 Sunset Project, ENV EIR. Dear Mr. Ibarra,

THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LOCAL LANDMARK NOMINATION INSTRUCTIONS

Historic Preservation in Charlottesville 2011

California Preservation Foundation Historic Resources 101 HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP

Architectural Inventory Form

Illustration of Eastlake Farmer s Cooperative Grain Elevator. Chapter 5: implementation 5-1

October 26, Re: Draft Environmental Impact Report for Paramount Pictures Master Plan, ENV EIR. Dear Mr. Villani,

CITY OF DES MOINES LANDMARK REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Tuesday, June 13, 2017

CITY OF TORRANCE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE AND TORRANCE TRACT HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN. City Council Tuesday, December 5, 2017 PAGE & TURNBULL

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Draft Historic Preservation Vision, Goals, and Policies

DOWNTOWN FACADE GUIDELINES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

Town of Peru Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary

Protecting Scenic Views

FINAL WEST OAKLAND SPECIFIC PLAN & FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

2.0 AREA PLANS. Lakeside Business District. Lakeside Business District Land Use Categories:

Chapter 9. Historic Preservation Element

II-5. Narrowmoor Addition Conservation District

Chapter 10 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Front Yard Terracing PLNHLC South 1200 East Meeting Date: August 7, 2014

Mary Norwood. Mayoral Forum on Greenspace Responses

MAPLE RIDGE HERITAGE INVENTORY REVIEW & UPDATE. This current review involves determining which sites should remain on the listing and what new

Urban Planning and Land Use

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Downtown Storefronts

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION

Youth Category Award

CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE OF DESIGN GUIDELINES

WEST OAKLAND SPECIFIC PLAN & DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

District 9, Albus Brooks Blueprint Denver: Area of Change City and County of Denver, National Western Center

CEQA and Historic Preservation: A 360 Degree Review

Chapter 19: Cultural Resources

HISTORIC PRESERVATION: Community Identity Economic Development Sustainability

SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE TO DESIGNATE A LANDMARK DISTRICT OVERLAY FOR THE CRAWFORDS VISTA LANDMARK DISTRICT

Analysis of Environs of Clinton Park located at 901 W 5 th Street

CHAPTER 9. Community Character

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE34.30, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on August 25, 26, 27 and 28, 2014 CITY OF TORONTO

GRAND PRAIRIE SIGNIFICANT LANDMARK APPLICATION / INFORMATION FORM Please read guidelines and instructions before completing form

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION

Historic Preservation:

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION CHAPTER MBMC PROCEDURES FOR HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION

Planning Commission. DATE: February 9, 2017

Table L-1 Summary Action Strategy. Action Item Timing Status Responsible Agency

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION

City Center Specific Plan Amendments And Background Report City of Richmond. PLANNING COMMISION FINAL DRAFT January, 2001

Cookstown Heritage Conservation District Study Public Consultation March 26, 2013

Incentive Zoning Regulations Florida Municipal City of Orlando

CPD Rules and Regulations. Arapahoe Square Zoning and Design Standards/Guidelines

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

Arlington County Retail Plan

Staff Report and Recommendation

Architectural Inventory Form

Principle 7. Architectural Style and Historic Preservation PRINCIPLE 7

Architectural Inventory Form

SECTION II SECTION II STATEMENT OF GOALS, OBJECTIVES, PRINCIPLES, ASSUMPTIONS, POLICIES AND STANDARDS

THE POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR WALKABLE COMMUNITIES. Community Technical Assistance Program Building Active Communities Institute March 2016

Status Update (2006 vs. Now) Citizen s Advisory Committee February Plan for Prosperity

HAHN BUILDING 140 N.E. 1 ST AVENUE

In surveys, Dallas residents say what they want to change most

Chapter LANDMARKS AND HISTORIC SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICTS A.120 Enforcement A.130 Severability. Tacoma Municipal Code

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

CHAPTER 3 VISION, GOALS, & PLANNING PRINCIPLES. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Vision Statement. Growth Management Goals.

40 Years of Smart Growth Arlington County s Experience with Transit Oriented Development in the Rosslyn-Ballston Metro Corridor

Architectural Inventory Form

TOD IMPLEMENTATION BEST PRACTICE TOOLBOX Leveraging Transit for City Shaping

World Heritage Cultural Landscapes

CALL FOR ARTIST QUALIFICATIONS SUBMISSIONS. DIA Urban Arts Projects Phase One

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PINELLAS COUNTY MPO LIVABLE COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS

Transcription:

Landmark Ordinance Task Force Meeting 7 October 9, 2018

Tools for Character Preservation National Register State Register Arts Districts Tools Summary Administration Easements (perpetuity) or Covenants (time limit) Conservation Overlay Design Overlay National recognition of significance (individual or district). Honorary historic designation Federal No State recognition of significance (individual or district). Honorary historic designation State No Specialized state designation that encourages revitalization and helps retain character of neighborhood State of Colorado No Legal agreement that runs with deed Non-profit (easement) or SHPO (covenant) Yes Zoning tool that encourages conservation of existing features or character Local No Zoning tool that reinforces desired character Local No Design Review What it does Eligible for Federal and State Tax Credits and Colorado State Historic Fund grants. Consideration in Federal environmental review process Eligible for State Tax Credits and Colorado State Historic Fund grants. Consideration in state environmental review process Promotes economic vitality, pride of place. Eligible for grants and state economic programs Demolition prohibition. Design review by easement or covenant holder. Allows for compatible change, with protection of key features Modify building form and design standards through zoning review. May include new restrictions or additional allowances on building form, site design, materials, and architectural style (materials and arch. style not currently used in Denver). Modify limitation on permitted uses Modify building form and design standards through zoning review. May include new restrictions and standards What it does not do Does not protect from demolition or alteration Does not protect from demolition or alteration Does not protect from demolition or alteration Does not regulate use or new zoning measures. Does not require design review by local government Does not change the permitted uses in the underlying zone district. Does not add design review commission. Does not protect from demolition or alteration Does not change the permitted uses in the underlying zone district, or modify limitation on permitted uses. Does not add design review commission. Does not protect from demolition or alteration

Tools for Character Preservation Tools Summary Administration Design Review What it does What it does not do Individual Landmark Individual structure. Protects character of that property. Local Yes Highly discourages demolition. Design review on exterior. Eligible for State Tax Credits. Publiclyowned buildings eligible for Colorado State Historic Fund grants. Does not prohibit changes, alteration, or additions. Does not regulate use, interiors, exterior paint colors, vegetation, or general maintenance. Historic District Multiple structures. Protects historic character of neighborhood. Local Yes Highly discourages demolition of contributing buildings. Design review on exterior and infill. Eligible for State Tax Credits Does not prohibit changes, alteration, or additions. Does not regulate use, interiors, exterior paint colors, vegetation, or general maintenance. Cultural Heritage Individual or District (ex: Five Points Historical Cultural District) Individual or multiple structures. Preserves historic character and highlights culture of property or area Local Yes Often structure or district specific design guidelines used for design review. Protects historic character and culture of structure or neighborhood. Design review on exterior and infill Typically, does not require design review for work on interiors or general maintenance Streetside Districts (ex: Raleigh, NC) Multiple structures. Design review of readily visible portions of structures Local Yes Design review only on front 50% of property and anything visible in rear 50%. Design review on infill construction. Demolition review Typically, does not require design review for work on interiors or general maintenance Districts with Flexible Guidelines (ex. Gansevoort Market, NYC) Flexibility in additions, infill, and alterations based on district character Local Yes Preserves structures. Design review allows for creative additions or infill, while respecting character of district Typically, does not require design review for work on interiors or general maintenance Sign Designation (ex. Los Angles, CA and Miami, FL) Designation of sign, or sign and the building Local Yes Design review of signs, and building, if also designated May not protect building from demolition or alteration

National Register of Historic Places Honorary historic designation Eligible for Federal and State Tax Credits Colorado State Historic Fund grants Consideration in Federal environmental review process Section 106 Review Does not protect from demolition or alteration State Register of Historic Properties Honorary historic designation Eligible for State Tax Credits Colorado State Historic Fund grants Consideration in State environmental review process State Register Act Does not protect from demolition or alteration

Arts Districts Specialized state designation that encourages revitalization and helps retain character of neighborhood Promotes economic vitality, pride of place. Eligible for grants and state economic programs Does not protect from demolition or alteration

Easements Perpetuity Runs with deed Legal agreement managed by nonprofit Demolition prohibition Design review by easement holder More comprehensive review Covenants Time limit Runs with deed Legal agreement managed by SHPO Colorado State Historic Fund grant Demolition prohibition Design review by covenant holder Targeted review

Streetside Districts Review readily visible portions 50% of front façade 50% of side on corner lot 100% infill construction Districts with Flexible Guidelines Preserve structures Design review allows for creative additions or infill Must respect character of district

Sign Designation Two Examples Survey LA Historic-Cultural Monument Evaluate individually significant signs Sign types that may be significant character-defining features of buildings Miami Historic signs may possess intrinsic importance Acquire that importance as a result of their association with the historic building

CONSERVATION OVERLAYS

CRITERIA DISCUSSION

Definition of Culture Cultural resources can include structures, objects, or districts. Cultural heritage is rooted in a community s history. It helps define the beliefs, customs, and practices of a particular community. Culture can encompass businesses, institutions, organizations, events, traditions, arts, crafts, and practices.

1. History 30 years old, and shall: a. Have direct association with the historical development of the city, state or nation; b. Be the site of a significant historic event; or c. Have direct & substantial association with a person or group of persons who had influence on society. 2. Architecture design quality and integrity, and: a. Embody distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style or type; b. Be the significant work of a recognized architect or master builder; c. Contain elements of architectural design which represent a significant innovation d. Portray the environment of a group of people or physical development of an area in an era of history characterized by a distinctive architectural style. 3. Geography: a. Have a prominent location or be an established, familiar and orienting visual feature of the contemporary city; b. Promote understanding and appreciation of the urban environment by means of distinctive physical characteristics or rarity; c. Make a special contribution to Denver s distinctive character

Option 1a Rename Category and Insert Culture 3. Geography or Culture: a. Have a prominent location or be an established, familiar and orienting visual feature of the contemporary city; b. Promote understanding and appreciation of the urban environment by means of distinctive physical characteristics or rarity; c. Make a special contribution to Denver s distinctive character or is a source of pride or cultural significance

Option 1b Rename Category and Insert Culture 3. Geography or Culture: a. Have a prominent location or be an established, familiar and orienting visual feature of the contemporary city; b. Promote understanding and appreciation of the urban environment by means of distinctive physical characteristics or rarity; c. Make a special contribution to Denver s distinctive character or is a source of pride or cultural significance d. Represents an era of architectural, social, or economic history that allows an understanding of how the place or area was used by past generations

Option 2 Add Culture Category 1. History 2. Architecture 3. Geography 4. Heritage and Culture A. Represents an era of architectural, social, or economic history that allows an understanding of how the place or area was used by past generations B. Be a feature of a neighborhood, community, or the city that is a source of pride or cultural significance C. Associated with social movements, groups, institutions, achievements, or patterns of growth or change that contributed significantly to the heritage, culture, or development of Denver

Option 3a Remove Categories and Insert Culture 1. Have direct association with the historical development of the city, state or nation; 2. Be the site of a significant historic event; or 3. Have direct & substantial association with a person or group of persons who had influence on society. 4. Embody distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style or type; 5. Be the significant work of a recognized architect or master builder; 6. Contain elements of architectural design which represent a significant innovation 7. Portray the environment of a group of people or physical development of an area in an era of history characterized by a distinctive architectural style. 8. Have a prominent location or be an established, familiar and orienting visual feature of the contemporary city; 9. Promote understanding and appreciation of the urban environment by means of distinctive physical characteristics or rarity; 10. Make a special contribution to Denver s distinctive character or is a source of pride or cultural significance

Option 3b Remove Categories and Add Culture 1-10 Remain the same 11. Represents an era of architectural, social, or economic history that allows an understanding of how the place or area was used by past generations 12. Be a feature of a neighborhood, community, or the city that is a source of pride or cultural significance 13. Associated with social movements, groups, institutions, achievements, or patterns of growth or change that contributed significantly to the heritage, culture or development of Denver

R and R Bar LGBTQ+ Bar since 1960s Meet Landmark Criteria? History Long running gay bar Architecture Commercial Geography Colfax, identifiable sign Rare Integrity Permastone within Period of Significance

1378 Mariposa Paul and Lawrence Martinez Important figures in the Westside Chicano movement Meet Landmark Criteria? History Chicano movement Architecture Terrace Geography Corner property Integrity Stucco within Period of Significance

LOWER DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD

LDDRB Members - Current 7 members, appointed by Mayor A real estate developer A practicing architect A historic preservationist A preservation architect A resident of the district A property owner of the district An owner or operator of a business in the district 2 of the first 4 listed above shall not live in, own property in, own or operate a business in, maintain an office in or otherwise represent interests in the district.

LDDRB Members - Proposal 9 members, appointed by Mayor A real estate developer A practicing architect A historic preservationist A preservation architect A resident of the district A property owner of the district An owner or operator of a business in the district + 2 At-Large members 2 of the first 4 listed above shall not live in, own property in, own or operate a business in, maintain an office in or otherwise represent interests in the district.

Powers of Commission vs Board Commission is typically regulatory Ex: Landmark Preservation Commission may approve or deny design review or demolition project, but for designations it is primarily advisory (to City Council) Board is typically advisory Ex: Planning Board is advisory to City Council for rezoning applications Lower Downtown Design Review Board has regulatory powers like a Commission

Formalization of Existing Powers Commission is typically regulatory Ex: Landmark Preservation Commission may approve or deny design review or demolition project, but for designations it is primarily advisory (to City Council) Board is typically advisory Ex: Planning Board is advisory to City Council for rezoning applications Lower Downtown Design Review Board has regulatory powers like a Commission Proposal to change LDDRB to a Commission based on its current regulatory powers

LDDRB Purview - Current

LDDRB Purview - Proposed Larimer Square Downtown Historic District Downtown Historic Preservation Commission

Resulting Membership Change 9 members, appointed by Mayor A real estate developer A practicing architect A historic preservationist A preservation architect A resident of the districts A property owner of the districts An owner or operator of a business in the districts + 2 At-Large members