Washington State Growth Management Act: The Basics. Kitsap County Department of Community Development

Similar documents
Ridgefield and the Growth Management Act

Washington State s Growth Management Act

LU Encourage schools, institutions, and other community facilities that serve rural residents to locate in neighboring cities and towns.

Chapter 1 - Land Use

ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES

Introduction. Chapter Introduction Statement of Purpose and Intent

Growth Management Planning in the Central Puget Sound Region. Today s Presentation. Puget Sound Region. New Partners for Smart Growth

Potential Annexation Areas And Annexation

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

l D. The proposed amendments to the GPP are consistent with and advance the 2 Countywide Planning Policies (CPP), in particular:

PSRC REVIEW REPORT & CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION

City of Richland Comprehensive Plan: Integrated Non-project Final Environmental Impact Statement

Staff Report & Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Amendments to the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan

Urban Fringe Subarea Plan

DOCKET & STATUS UPDATE

Introduction. Chapter 2 Land Use

Growth Area within the City of Gig Harbor s Potential Annexation Area in the East Bay area Pierce County Planning and Public Works

LAND USE ELEMENT. Purpose. General Goals & Policies

COUNTY-WIDE PLANNING POLICIES

GREATER EAST WENATCHEE AREA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CITY OF EAST WENATCHEE WASHINGTON

Rural issues need to be addressed in a comprehensive manner, with clear criteria for identification, development, and use of these lands

Rural Land Use Designations Kittitas County December 6, 2007 Draft

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

Exhibit A Comprehensive Plan Amendments

Public Visioning City of Kelso Planning Commission

Introduction to the Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Update. City of Bellingham Planning Department 2005

Keeping the Rural Vision. Protecting Rural Character & Planning for Rural Development

This page is intentionally left blank.

POLICIES & REGULATIONS

Shoreline Master Program Town of La Conner, Washington

Chapter 2: Land Use Element

Source: Albemarle County Community Development 2010

Envision Skagit 2060 Citizen Committee Briefing Paper

Countywide Planning Policies. for Pierce County, Washington

Skagit County. Countywide Planning Policies

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

Purpose of the Master Plan

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

Purpose of the Master Plan

2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments C OMPREHENSIVE P LAN T EXT AND M AP A MENDMENT

This page intentionally blank.

Woodburn Comprehensive Plan Growth Management Goals and Policies

Chapter 10 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

INTRODUCTION. b. The extent to which such problems and objectives have been reduced or have increased subsequent to such date.

LEGAL NOTICE. City of Tacoma Determination of Environmental Nonsignificance. Fred Wagner, Wagner Development. Demolition of Manitou school buildings

Manchester. Vision for Manchester

Attachment Land Use Element. Land Use Element

Town of Castle Rock DRCOG 2013 Annual Growth and Development Report. Introduction. Section 1 Metro Vision 2035

City of Gig Harbor. Comprehensive Plan

2015 Comprehensive Plan

RESOLUTION NUMBER Kitsap County Public Works Stormwater Division Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan

The protection of the agricultural resources of the Province;

Town of Washington Master Plan & Regulatory Audit: Interim Results

GREATER EAST WENATCHEE AREA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CITY OF EAST WENATCHEE WASHINGTON

Chapter 14. Shorelines

Meta-Analysis of Project Effectiveness: Learning at the Regional Scale

Page 1 ORDINANCE NO. 974

WHEREAS, the Des Moines Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the City Council on December 7, 1995 by enactment of Ordinance No.

Silver Line CPAM UPDATE. Transportation and Land Use Committee October 14, 2016

Glenmont III Parking Garage: Approval of Supplemental Public Hearing Staff Report and Staff Recommendations

EXECUTIVE/COUNCIL APPROVAL FORM OTHER

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services Department

ORDINANCE NO. City of Bellingham City Attorney 210 Lottie Street Bellingham, Washington INFILL HOUSING ORDINANCE Page 1

Rezoning Issues Setting a Foundation for Zoning Decisions

City of Mahtomedi Park System Plan Public Hearing Draft: September 13, 2006

Sorted citizen input comments in review of Blount County plans July, August, and September 2007

Erik Rundell, Project Manager

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL State of Washington 60th Legislature 2007 Regular Session

Living in Albemarle County s Urban Places

Stafford County Strategic Plans

FAQ S about Restoration Planning FROM THE Department of Ecology WEBSITE:

E O L A F I V E. Location Map SUMMARY G M P Z O N I T E M S # 1 A. & B.

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 2010 Legislative Session. Council Members Dernoga and Olson

CITY OF BELLINGHAM PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

Outlawing Sprawl. Pennsylvania Chapter American Planning Association October 6, 2009

Keyport. Vision for Keyport

Urban Fringe Subarea Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Element September 1997

This chapter describes the purpose of the Plan, introduces how the Plan is organized and provides contextual background for the Plan.

Oregon s Planning Program History. Oregon s Planning Program History. Oregon s Planning Program History. Oregon s Planning Program History

12 February 9, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: WILDLIFE RESPONSE, INC.

9 CITY OF VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO BOCA EAST INVESTMENTS LIMITED

Silverdale Regional Center

Location. Need GOAL 14 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY. Urban Planning in Oregon 7/8/2015

AGENDA Wednesday June 14, :30 PM Douglas County Public Services Building Hearing Room th Street NW, East Wenatchee, WA

Planning Roles. Responsibilities

10 Implementation. Implementation. Responsibility for Implementation. Blueprint for Bloomsburg. Town of Bloomsburg Comprehensive Plan 10-1

4.1 LAND USE AND HOUSING

1 Introduction. Chapter. In this chapter:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Open House Schedule min to Visit Stations, Ask Questions and Contribute Your Thoughts min Presentation

Welcome to the Oakridge Centre Open House

Implementation Vision

City Center Neighborhood Plan

2 August 14, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT: CRESCENT COMMUNITY CENTER CORP. PROPERTY OWNER: S. L. ETHERIDGE, LLC

Best Practices Appendix: Waterfront Communities

IC Chapter Severe Weather Warning Sirens

CITY OF HAWTHORNE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CITY OF HAWTHORNE

Transcription:

Washington State Growth Management Act: The Basics Kitsap County Department of Community Development

Purpose/History Enacted in 1990 Amended virtually every year since Manage Growth Concentrating population in urban areas Efficiency of public services Preserve Rural Areas Protect Critical Areas Conserve Resource Lands

Hierarchy of Planning Countywide Planning Policy (CPPs) Regional framework developed by county and cities; ensures consistency among plans Comprehensive land use plan Goals, policies and future land use map Land use designations Development regulations Implements comprehensive plan goals and policies; Zoning code & map; CAO; other land use regulations (e.g., subdivision)

Key GMA Provisions GMA Goals RCW 36.70A.020 overarching / not prioritized Comprehensive plan elements -.070 Urban Growth Areas -.110 Comprehensive plan & development regulations amendments/updates -.130 Countywide Planning Policy -.210 Review and Evaluation Program -.215

Comprehensive plan Required Elements Land use Housing Capital facilities Utilities Rural Transportation Economic Development (optional) Parks & Recreational

Urban Growth Areas RCW 36.70A.110 Areas within which urban growth shall be encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature. Each city shall be included within an UGA Urban facility and service capacities Urban services cannot extend outside UGA

Urban Growth Areas Sizing UGAs Based on a 20-year population projection The land speaks first Identify resource and critical areas first Urban growth first in areas already characterized by urban growth; second in areas characterized but not yet with urban services; and third adjacent to such areas UGA based upon projected population at urban densities, public service provision, greenbelt and open spaces Do this through a land capacity analysis

Comprehensive plan Housing Sufficient land, variety of housing types, Land use element Including densities, uses, public facilities, open space, stormwater Capital facilities plan LOS, Location, capacity, and funding Requirement to reassess land use if funding is not adequate

Comprehensive plan Utilities Element Gas, electricity, telecommunications Rural Element Variety of rural densities, uses, essential public facilities, rural governmental services Limited Areas of More Intense Rural Development (LAMIRD) Three types

Comprehensive plan Transportation Element LOS; traffic forecast, concurrency Economic Development Optional Parks & Recreation Optional Subarea Plans

Development Regulations Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO) Zoning Regulations Subdivision Regulations Shoreline Management Act All must implement and be consistent with the comprehensive plan

Review and Update Required under RCW 36.70A.130 A single 8 year review consideration of critical area ordinances analysis of the projected population in most recent OFM UGAs Permitted densities in UGAs Extent of urban growth occurring within UGAs Revise UGAs and densities to accommodate the projected urban growth for the succeeding twenty-year period. Revise implementing development regulations as needed

Review and Update Buildable Lands Report (BLR) Required of certain jurisdictions A look back at how we are doing Where we need to focus on update to meet GMA goals and County vision Whether we need any additional reasonable measures

Issues Consistency With GMA goals and substantive requirements Capital budget decisions Internal w/in itself and development regulations External with CPPs; city plans Concurrency Public Participation -- enhanced

Growth Board Appeals Growth Management Hearing Board Jurisdiction to hear petitions alleging: (a) A county is not in compliance with the requirements of GMA, SMA (plans) or SEPA relating to plans, development regulations or amendments thereto (b) That the twenty-year growth management planning population projections adopted by OFM should be adjusted;

Growth Board Appeals Appeals must be brought within 60 days of publication of a notice of adoption Plans, amendments and development regulations are presumed valid Growth Hearing Board is to give deference to local jurisdiction