What We Heard Report: Westmount Architectural Heritage Area Rezoning Drop-in Workshop

Similar documents
Mill Woods Town Centre Proposed Rezoning LDA

JASPER PLACE. Area Redevelopment Plan

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

Crofton Manor 2803 West 41st Avenue WHAT WE HEARD. Public Consultation: Phase 1

WHAT WE HEARD REPORT - Summary Bonnie Doon Mall Redevelopment Application (LDA )

1120 Haist Street - Pelham Arena Community Co-Design Recommendation Report Haist Street - Pelham Arena Community Co-Design Recommendation Report

June 19th Public Workshop #3 Summary

In surveys, Dallas residents say what they want to change most

Bylaw A Bylaw to amend Bylaw 12800, as amended, The Edmonton Zoning Bylaw Amendment No. 1592

4- PA - LD - LIVELY DOWNTOWN. LD - Background

Waverley West B Secondary Planning Process. Open House South Pointe School April 25, 2018

Urban Planning and Land Use

Chapter 2: Vision, Goals and Strategies

POLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT TUXEDO PARK (WARD 9) CENTRE STREET N AND 26 AVENUE NE BYLAWS 36P2017 AND 234D2017

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

Building Great Neighbourhoods. Strathcona

CDAC. Update: Downtown Dartmouth Update: CDAC July 25 th Motion

Coliseum Station Area Area Redevelopment Plan. Public Engagement #1 June 12, 2017

One said, without a clear understanding of what will be annexed, this is an exercise in futility.

Draft Masterplan Consultation Report Summer 2015 Spring (Updated following community review)

ROAD CLOSURE AND LAND USE AMENDMENT SILVER SPRINGS (WARD 1) NORTHEAST OF NOSEHILL DRIVE NW AND SILVER SPRINGS ROAD NW BYLAWS 2C2018 AND 29D2018

Attachment 1 TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH. Manual for the Preparation of an Urban Design Report

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

BENSON / HUNT TERTIARY PLAN

178 Carruthers Properties Inc.

Local Growth Planning in North Central Green Line Communities

HERITAGE ACTION PLAN. Towards a renewed Heritage Conservation Program. What is the Heritage Action Plan? Key areas of work. A Collaborative Approach

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION

Denton. A. Downtown Task Force

Don Mills Crossing Study and Celestica Lands Development Application Community Meeting, Open House, and Breakout Discussions

LUNDY S LANE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN STUDY

Long Branch Neighbourhood Character Guidelines Final Report

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

The Five Components of the McLoughlin Area Plan

Welcome to Our Open House

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2018 January 25. That Calgary Planning Commission recommend APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

Secondary Plan - Annexed Lands. Vision Workshop Summary March 14th 2011

MINUTES OAK BAY ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, JUNE 6, 2017 AT 5:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL HALL, 2167 OAK BAY AVENUE

Urban Growth Boundaries

King-Spadina Secondary Plan Community Consultation Meeting. Michelle Knieriem, City Planner October 11, 2017

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

Municipal Development Plan 2013

Duplex Design Guidelines

Town of Cobourg Heritage Master Plan. Statutory Public Meeting

AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN THE WAY WE GROW

Public Open House. Overview of the Downtown Plan Official Plan Amendment April 23, 2018

Workshop 3. City of Burlington Waterfront Hotel Planning Study. September 14, The Planning Partnership

Status Report: MD 355 Project

The Cambie Corridor 2015 Fall workshop series. What we heard WORKSHOP OUTLINE

City of Le Sueur DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN

Downtown Whitby Action Plan

Unique. Livable. Connected. Sustainable. Anticipate and Manage Change. Variety of Housing Choices. Enhanced Arterial Corridors

Public Open House #1

Port Lavaca Future Land Use

Vision Workshop Summary Report

Blood Alley Square/Trounce Alley Redesign

LANEWAYS 2.0. Laneway opportunities in the West End

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

CITY CLERK. Parkland Acquisition Strategic Directions Report (All Wards)

TOWN OF BRUDERHEIM Report to the capital region board

Loved hearing what others shared and having a dialogue about the possibilities/opportunities

FOUR MILE RUN VALLEY WORKING GROUP AND CHARGE

A COMMUNITY VISION. For the County of Brant

KING-SPADINA COMMERCIAL HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN COMMUNITY CONSULTATION MEETING #1

MOUNT PLEASANT COMMUNITY PLAN

Cookstown Heritage Conservation District Study Public Consultation March 26, 2013

PRIORITIES COMMITTEE MEETING

LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

Quarterly Report & Code Evaluation

New-Cast Mixed-use Development Proposal King Street West, Newcastle, Ontario

Welcome to the Oakridge Centre Open House

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )

Blackfriars Heritage Conservation District Plan

SECTION E. Realizing the Plan

280 Manse Road - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report

SUMMERSIDE / MT. CARMEL REINVESTMENT CORRIDOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

Executive Summary. NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor

South Central Connecticut Region Plan of Conservation & Development 2018 Update. Municipal Planners

New Street Proposed Redevelopment Architecture & Urban Design Brief

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT POLICY DRAFT. City Planning and Development Department Kansas City, Missouri

Further input invited as Colchester Growth Strategy nears final phase

Housing and Coach House Guidelines - Ladner

LAND USE AMENDMENT DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL CORE (WARD 7) MACLEOD TRAIL SE AND 5 AVENUE SE BYLAW 254D2017

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

FORMER CANADIAN FORCES BASE (CFB) ROCKCLIFFE SECONDARY PLAN. Official Plan Amendment XX to the Official Plan for the City of Ottawa

... on the draft Arden Vision & Framework

Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Roncesvalles Avenue

Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool

Gulf Islands National Park Reserve Management Plan Newsletter #3

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Steering Committee Meeting

hello! Backgrounder Design Jams September 17-19, 2018 Sidewalk Toronto: Backgrounder

Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building. SUBJECT: Draft Lakeview Local Area Plan (January 2014)

Chapter 3 Community Involvement

Welcome. Comprehensive Plan & Transportation Plan Open House November 7, 2012

ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD

Courtice Main Street Study Community Vision Workshop PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT

June To Whom It May Concern:

Port Marigny TND Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop September 1, 2015 Preliminary Observations - David Bailey, AIA, AICP

Transcription:

What We Heard Report: Westmount Architectural Heritage Area Rezoning Drop-in Workshop August 2018

What We Heard Report: Westmount Architectural Heritage Area Rezoning Drop-in Workshop Executive Summary This report summarizes input that was received in relation to Phase 1 of the Westmount Architectural Heritage Area (WAHA) Rezoning. The public was invited to attend a drop-in workshop held on March 13, 2018 to start the conversation and discuss what they value about the area, the opportunities and challenges related to preserving the neighbourhood s historic character, as well as what the project team should consider as we move forward in the rezoning process. Tuesday, 6-9 pm Westmount Community League Hall 10970 127 Street NW Edmonton Information boards outlining the preliminary findings of the City s character analysis of the WAHA were provided at the drop-in workshop. A total of seven City of Edmonton staff from Heritage Management, Planning Coordination, and Communications and Engagement and one representative from Green Space Alliance, the consultant providing support to the project, were in attendance and were available for one-on-one discussion. 77 Drop-in workshop participants 48 Online number of respondents 2 What We Heard Report: Westmount Architectural Heritage Area Rezoning Drop-in Workshop

A number of key themes, which are explored in greater detail later in this report, were identified from participant feedback: Values we asked What do you value about the Westmount Architectural Heritage Area? What aspects of the WAHA are important to you? what we heard + Architectural Heritage: The unique characteristics of historic homes + Community: A shared sense of community and pride amongst neighbours + Streetscape: The look and feel of the WAHA + History: The WAHA as a reflection of Edmonton s past Challenges we asked What challenges do you anticipate in trying to preserve the historic character of the WAHA? what we heard + Development Pressure: Increasing development pressure and erosion of neighbourhood character + Perceived Lack of City Support: A lack of support from the City and conflicts with broader City policy direction + Voluntary Guidelines: Limited protections afforded by existing voluntary guidelines + Challenges of Preserving Heritage Homes: The challenges of rehabilitation and ongoing maintenance Opportunities we asked What opportunities do you see in this exercise to preserve what you value about the WAHA? what we heard + Heritage Protection: Celebrating the character of the WAHA + Clarity: Developing clear direction and consensus + Architectural Character: Ensuring new development is consistent with the architectural character of the WAHA Zoning Considerations we asked What should we be considering as we develop zoning options for the WAHA?? what we heard + Mandatory Regulations: Mandatory regulations are necessary to preserve the heritage character of the WAHA + Character Preservation: Balancing heritage preservation with future redevelopment + Redevelopment Opportunities: Accommodating a diversity of housing options + Development and Design Criteria: Establishing clear development and design criteria + Use: Maintaining the residential nature of the WAHA What We Heard Report: Westmount Architectural Heritage Area Rezoning Drop-in Workshop 3

Project Goals The goal of the Westmount Architectural Heritage Area (WAHA) Rezoning Project is to build consensus in relation to the appropriate amendments to the West-Ingle Area Redevelopment Plan (ARP) and WAHA Direct Development Control (DC1) Provision. Objectives: + Encourage the retention of and appropriate alterations to historically and architecturally significant properties + Implement architectural controls to guide new development + Ensure that, where feasible, the DC1 Provision is consistent with current zoning standards and broader City policies and objectives + Clarify development requirements in order to provide certainty to the community and developers and mitigate the potential for conflict what is a direct development control (dc1) provision? DC1 Provisions are custom zoning provisions which may be applied to sites or areas of unique architectural or historic character. DC1 Provisions are often founded on the regulations of the underlying standard land use zone and augmented by a variable mix of additional regulations and/or guidelines to ensure that development respects and enhances an area s character. 4 What We Heard Report: Westmount Architectural Heritage Area Rezoning Drop-in Workshop

Workshop Objectives The objective of this drop-in workshop was to initiate a dialogue with stakeholders in order to better understand what they value about the WAHA and identify challenges and opportunities to be addressed through the proposed amendments to the West-Ingle Area Redevelopment Plan and WAHA DC1 Zone. In addition, preliminary findings from the City s character analysis of the WAHA were presented to establish a common starting point for all stakeholders involved in the rezoning exercise. project phases Phase 1 Development of Concept ARP and DC1 Amendments Phase 2 Development of Proposed ARP and DC1 Amendments Phase 3 Final ARP and DC1 Amendments proposed to Council We are here Project Launch Spring 2018 Validation of Concept ARP and DC1 Amendments Fall 2018 Validation of Final ARP and DC1 Amendments Spring 2019 Public Hearing Summer 2019 Engagement 1 Drop-in Workshop What We Heard Report Engagement 2 Drop-in Workshop Engagement 3 Drop-in Workshop City Council will consider the Final DC1 and ARP amendments Your Feedback Participants were asked to provide their feedback on four broad questions: 1 2 3 4 What do you value about the Westmount Architectural Heritage Area? What aspects of the WAHA are important to you? What opportunities do you see in this exercise to preserve what you value about the WAHA? What challenges do you anticipate in trying to preserve the historic character of the WAHA? What should we be considering as we develop zoning options for the WAHA? Feedback was provided by participants via post-it notes and a questionnaire that was collected at the drop-in workshop. The same questionnaire was available online from March 13, 2018 - March 27, 2018. 58 individuals in total provided feedback via the questionnaires. All participant feedback in response to the questions was consolidated and recorded electronically. Feedback was grouped according to four categories: Values, Opportunities, Challenges, and Zoning Options. Within each category, feedback provided was reviewed in detail and key themes were identified from recurring comments from participants. These key themes are outlined for each category in this report. What We Heard Report: Westmount Architectural Heritage Area Rezoning Drop-in Workshop 5

Values Architectural Heritage Community Streetscape History The WAHA is broadly valued for its concentration of heritage homes, quiet, leafy streets and its close proximity to downtown Edmonton. Residents of the WAHA value a shared sense of community and pride for their neighbourhood. The WAHA is also valued as a way to connect Edmonton s past to its present. Architectural Heritage Participants broadly valued the architectural heritage and character of the WAHA, in particular, the concentration of well preserved historic homes. In addition, participants valued a diversity of housing styles and the unique characteristics of individual homes within the neighbourhood. Finally, the consistency of historic built forms was identified as creating a unified and celebrated appearance that is distinct to the WAHA. In addition, participants valued: + A diversity of large and small homes on varied lot sizes + Homes with consistent rooflines, and in particular, pitched or peaked roofs + The diversity of bungalows, two-storey, and three-storey homes + Unique, character homes with minimal intrusion of cookie-cutter homes + Open front verandahs + Craftsman and Foursquare style homes and influences + High standard of construction and architectural integrity of heritage homes The beautiful character of the homes and the mature streets are what make this area so special. 6 What We Heard Report: Westmount Architectural Heritage Area Rezoning Drop-in Workshop

values (cont) Community Participants valued the shared sense of community within the WAHA and their connections among neighbours. Participants noted that neighbours often interact with one another as a result of historic architecture, specifically open, front verandahs. Finally, participants highlighted that the unique history of the WAHA has generated a tight-knit community with a mutual respect for the neighbourhood. Participants also valued: + The diversity of residents in the neighborhood + A shared sense of pride in the WAHA + Residents who maintain their homes and yards + Neighbourhood interactions such as saying Hello + Connections between neighbours generated over preservation efforts and renovation projects Streetscape Participants valued the overall look and feel of streetscapes within the WAHA. A number of participants identified mature boulevard trees as highly valued elements of the neighbourhood. Participants also valued that homes are situated closer to the street through consistent front yard setbacks, facilitating connections to the sidewalk. In addition, participants valued: + The walkability of the streetscapes in the WAHA + Garages located at the rear + Rear lanes for parking + The absence of front driveways + The scale of the homes History Participants valued the WAHA as a reflection of Edmonton s heritage and as a way to connect Edmonton s history to its present. Many participants viewed the WAHA as a valuable historic and architectural resource to Edmonton as a whole. Participants also valued: + The unique history of the WAHA + Preservation of historic homes + The feeling of stepping back in time when within the WAHA What We Heard Report: Westmount Architectural Heritage Area Rezoning Drop-in Workshop 7

Opportunities Heritage Protection Architectural Character Clarity Participants viewed this exercise as a way to protect the heritage character of the neighbourhood and ensure that the WAHA is preserved for future generations. This exercise was also viewed as an opportunity to provide clarity for builders and the community by developing a regulatory framework to ensure that redevelopment is consistent with the existing historic built forms throughout the neighborhood. Heritage Protection Participants frequently noted that historic buildings should be protected, preserved, and maintained. This exercise was seen as an opportunity to preserve the unique character of the neighbourhood while celebrating and promoting Edmonton s history. In addition, participants identified this exercise as an opportunity to: + Encourage enhanced protection of heritage properties through Municipal Historic Resource designation + Preserve the neighbourhood as a valuable historic resource in Edmonton + Promote Edmonton s built heritage + Ensure that Edmonton s history is preserved for future generations + Ensure that redevelopment does not compromise the value of historic resources + Create more interest, awareness, and commitment to preserve heritage This exercise is an opportunity for the people of the WAHA and the City to work together to preserve Edmonton s history for future generations. 8 What We Heard Report: Westmount Architectural Heritage Area Rezoning Drop-in Workshop

opportunities (cont) Architectural Character Participants recognized the need for a diversity of housing options within the neighborhood and generally expressed that they are not opposed to new development, provided that it is respectful of the existing character of the area. Participants identified this exercise as an opportunity to establish architectural criteria for infill to ensure that new development respects the historical nature of the WAHA. In addition, participants identified this exercise as an opportunity to: + Preserve the look and feel of the WAHA + Allow for a diversity of old and new homes + Ensure that materials used for new development are reflective of existing materials in the WAHA + Allow for renovations of existing homes while retaining original architecture + Encourage new development which fits with the character of the WAHA + Protect and preserve the architectural character of the WAHA Clarity Participants identified that existing voluntary guidelines have been ineffective in preserving the heritage character of the WAHA and viewed this exercise as an opportunity to develop a consistent regulatory framework for the area. Participants emphasized the need to develop mandatory regulations to ensure that redevelopment is reflective of the existing historic character of the neighbourhood. Participants also identified this exercise as an opportunity to reduce conflict by providing clear and specific direction for builders and the community. Participants also viewed this exercise as an opportunity to: + Establish mandatory architectural regulations for features such as verandahs, windows, and housing style + Establish regulations which will preserve the character of the area + Provide regulations for redevelopment and renovations of existing homes + Strengthen the existing voluntary guidelines + Open a dialogue between neighbours about what aspects of the neighbourhood character are valued + Create a collaborative relationship between the community and the City What We Heard Report: Westmount Architectural Heritage Area Rezoning Drop-in Workshop 9

Challenges Development Pressure Perceived Lack of City Support Voluntary Guidelines Challenges of Preserving Heritage Homes Participants identified a number of potential challenges in trying to preserve the historic character of the WAHA, including increasing development pressure and a lack of community consensus. One of the key challenges recognized by participants is the voluntary nature of the existing WAHA DC1, resulting in demolitions of historic homes and new development that is not consistent with the heritage character of the WAHA. Development Pressure Participants identified increasing development pressure as a challenge to preserving the historic character of the WAHA. In particular, participants identified increasing demolitions of existing historic homes and redevelopment that is not sympathetic to the existing character of the WAHA as key challenges. If mandatory architectural regulations are not put in place, the unique character of our neighbourhood will be destroyed lot by lot. Additional challenges identified by participants included: + Infill development + Development of modern homes which do not respect the character of the area + Homeowners undergoing renovations which are not consistent with the original features of the home + Subdivision of lots + Increasing animosity towards developers 10 What We Heard Report: Westmount Architectural Heritage Area Rezoning Drop-in Workshop 3

challenges (cont) Perceived Lack of City Support Participants identified a lack of support from the City as a challenge to preserving the historic character of the WAHA. Broader City policy direction promoting densification and infill were specifically identified as challenges to heritage preservation within the area. In addition, participants identified that: + Demolitions and inappropriate redevelopment will continue to occur prior to the proposed amendments to West-Ingle ARP and the WAHA DC1 Voluntary Guidelines Participants identified the voluntary nature of guidelines within the existing WAHA DC1 as perhaps the leading challenge in preserving the historic character of the WAHA. Some related challenges noted by participants included: + Inconsistent application of the existing guidelines + Development that does not adhere to the guidelines and is not consistent with the existing characteristics of the WAHA + Animosity directed towards homeowners who have already built homes that do not conform to the existing guidelines Challenges of Preserving Heritage Homes Participants noted a number of challenges associated with the preservation of heritage homes, including financial commitments required for rehabilitation and ongoing maintenance. Participants identified additional challenges including: + A lack of financial incentives to encourage homeowners to rehabilitate heritage homes + The high cost of upgrading heritage homes so that they are energy efficient and safe + The perception that it is easier to demolish and rebuild rather than to restore heritage homes What We Heard Report: Westmount Architectural Heritage Area Rezoning Drop-in Workshop 11

Zoning Considerations Character Preservation Redevelopment Opportunities Development and Design Criteria Use Participants collectively called for the new WAHA DC1 to include mandatory design and development regulations in order to protect the heritage character of the neighbourhood and provide clear and specific direction for builders and the community alike. In addition, participants recognized that new zoning must balance heritage preservation with opportunities for moderate increases in density. Mandatory Regulations Participants overwhelmingly identified that the existing voluntary guidelines are largely ineffective in preserving the heritage character of the WAHA and should, therefore, be amended to mandatory regulations. Participants also asked us to consider: + Regulating only the exterior features of homes within the WAHA + Regulating key architectural features and elements which contribute to the character of the streetscape + Establishing enforceable regulations Diversify and densify the community without losing the feel and style of the area s heritage. 12 What We Heard Report: Westmount Architectural Heritage Area Rezoning Drop-in Workshop

zoning considerations (cont) Character Preservation Participants recognized that the new WAHA DC1 will need to balance heritage preservation with future redevelopment. Participants emphasized that new WAHA DC1 must ensure that new development is sympathetic to the historic character of WAHA. In addition, participants emphasized that new WAHA DC1 should: + Preserve original features of historic homes + Preserve the heritage character of the streetscape Redevelopment Opportunities Participants identified that the new WAHA DC1 should provide opportunities for moderate densification in the neighbourhood and accommodate a diversity of compatible housing options while preserving the heritage character of the WAHA. Participants asked us to consider: + Balancing development potential with heritage preservation + Opportunities to allow for secondary, garage, and basement suites within the WAHA + The perception that regulations will detract from future investment in the neighbourhood and negatively impact future sales of properties in the WAHA Development and Design Criteria Participants expressed that the new WAHA DC1 should establish clear and specific development and design criteria for new development as well as renovations to existing homes within the WAHA. Participants emphasized that development and design criteria should guide development to be consistent with the heritage character of the WAHA. Participants suggested that design and development criteria should: + Regulate roofs to ensure pitched or peaked roofs are mandatory + Regulate window size and ensure that windows reflect historic styles + Maintain current front and side-yard setbacks + Ensure that development is scaled appropriately to existing homes + Allow for the use of new materials as long as they are sympathetic to the character of existing homes + Ensure that any new materials are consistent with the appearance of traditional materials Use Participants expressed that the residential nature of WAHA should be maintained and suggested that the new WAHA DC1 should reflect the underlying (RF1) Single Detached Residential Zone. Additionally, participants asked us to consider: + Preventing the intrusion of commercial uses into the WAHA + Enhancing development criteria in relation to permitted uses in the existing WAHA DC1 What We Heard Report: Westmount Architectural Heritage Area Rezoning Drop-in Workshop 13

Feedback on Engagement how will my feedback be used? Feedback from this drop-in workshop will be used to guide the development of amendments to the West-Ingle ARP and WAHA DC1. 14 What We Heard Report: Westmount Architectural Heritage Area Rezoning Drop-in Workshop

Feedback on Engagement A Drop-In Workshop Evaluation Survey was available at the drop-in workshop to evaluate the engagement and provide feedback as to how we may continue to improve our events and content. In total, 33 survey responses were received. Q.1 How did you hear about the Westmount Architectural Heritage Area rezoning Drop-in Workshop? #OF RESPONSES 0 5 10 15 20 25 Facebook Twitter City of Edmonton Website Family/friend Post Card Westmount Community League Personal Invitation 48 Total number of responses Q.2 I felt welcome and respected in this space. #OF RESPONSES 0 5 10 15 20 25 Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 33 Total number of responses Q.3 I felt safe sharing my input at different project tables. #OF RESPONSES 0 5 10 15 20 25 Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 31 Total number of responses What We Heard Report: Westmount Architectural Heritage Area Rezoning Drop-in Workshop 15

feedback on engagement (cont) Q.4 I feel that the input provided will be used by the City. #OF RESPONSES 0 5 10 15 20 25 Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 33 Total number of responses Q.5 The purpose of this Drop-in Workshop was clearly explained. #OF RESPONSES 0 5 10 15 20 25 Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 33 Total number of responses Q.6 I understand how the input from the Drop-in Workshop will be used. #OF RESPONSES 0 5 10 15 20 25 Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 33 Total number of responses Q.7 The Drop-in Workshop was well organized. #OF RESPONSES 0 5 10 15 20 25 Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 32 Total number of responses 16 What We Heard Report: Westmount Architectural Heritage Area Rezoning Drop-in Workshop

feedback on engagement (cont) Q.8 The information boards were eady to understand and informative. #OF RESPONSES 0 5 10 15 20 25 Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 33 Total number of responses Q.9 The event set-up was appropriate. #OF RESPONSES 0 5 10 15 20 25 Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 32 Total number of responses A majority of respondents also told us: + The workshop was a good opportunity to speak directly with Heritage Planners and share their input + They were glad the event was held and that the project was happening + The information boards were useful as they provided detailed, clear information and were well organized + They liked the ability to move through the room and interact at their own pace + They preferred a drop-in workshop as opposed to a town hall style meeting + There were enough staff to answer questions and engage in one-on-one discussions and staff were friendly + They would have liked a presentation by a Heritage Planner during the drop-in workshop, as it would have been helpful to introduce the rezoning exercise + They would have liked to have a Q+A session with a Heritage Planner + They would like to know how their feedback will be used What We Heard Report: Westmount Architectural Heritage Area Rezoning Drop-in Workshop 17

Next Steps Concept ARP and DC1 amendments will be developed by Heritage Planners to respond to the values, challenges and opportunities as identified by participants in Phase 1 of the rezoning exercise. Concept ARP and DC1 amendments will be informed by feedback gathered from Phase 1 of the rezoning exercise, heritage management best practices, current zoning standards and broader City policies and objectives. You can provide your feedback on the Concept ARP and DC1 amendments at our next Drop-in Workshop on September 25, 2018 at the Westmount Community League Hall. 18 What We Heard Report: Westmount Architectural Heritage Area Rezoning Drop-in Workshop

Thank You! The project team would like to thank everyone who participated in the drop-in workshop and the Westmount Community League for their feedback and ongoing support of this rezoning exercise. What We Heard Report: Westmount Architectural Heritage Area Rezoning Drop-in Workshop 19

for more information Scott Ashe, Principal Heritage Planner Telephone: 780-442-5045 Fax: 780-401-7052 Email: scott.ashe@edmonton.ca 6th Floor, Edmonton Tower, 10111-104 Avenue NW, Edmonton AB T5J 0J4 Please visit edmonton.ca/westmountarchitecturalheritagearea