Arborist Structural failure profile: Monterey Cypress (Hesperocyparis macrocarpa)

Similar documents
Second Wednesdays 1:00 2:15 pm ET USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

ZANDER ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants

AFTER THE STORM DISPUTING SOME COMMON TREE FAILURE BELIEFS

Pebble Beach Community Services District Fire Department 3101 Forest Lake Road, Pebble Beach, CA

HAZARD TREE ANAYLSIS

Chaska Oaks Preservation Plan September 29, 2017

Get help from landscape experts.

Date Received: File Number: Staff Reviewer: 1. PROPERTY OWNER: Name: Address: Telephone: Fax:

This Hazard Tree Recognition Training is dedicated to Gwen Saltis Trail Crew Leader, Inyo National Forest. July 19, 2003 Think about the future but

Hazard Tree Awareness

Appendix 1 Using the ISA Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form

Structural pruning shade trees

PRUNING STANDARDS FOR TREES CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO JUNE 27, 2006

City of Sebastopol Tree Board Staff Report

Urban Forest Hurricane Recovery Program.

TREE INVENTORY LIST. Treatment Tag Dbh Height Dripline Species Condition Notes

Basic Pruning Techniques

Tree Risk Assessment. San Leandro Creek Location 2 Cary Dr. Alameda County Flood Control

Chapter 12 of the ISA s Study Guide based on the 2010 edition

Integration of Tree Spacing, Pruning and Rootstock Selection for Efficient Almond Production

How to Recognize - and Prevent - Hazard Trees By Tree City USA

MASONIC AVENUE STREETSCAPE Community Workshop. Masonic Avenue Streetscape Improvement Project

Pruning Trees. David S. Bienemann Municipal Arborist March 11, 2008

Introduction. Figure q

(This is a reprint of the original document.) By: Duane R. Durgee Alachua County Urban Forester

Memorandum Planning. Thursday, January 8, 2015

Developing a Preventive Pruning Program: Young Trees

INTRODUCTION. 1.1 What is a General Plan? 1.2 Requirements for a General Plan. 1.3 Introduction to Monterey County


PRUNING LANDSCAPE TREES. By Larry Figart, Urban Forestry Extension Agent Duval County Extension Service

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation December 13, 2007 COASTAL TRAIL AT LAND S END. File No Project Manager: Joan Cardellino

RECREATION, OPEN SPACE AND GREENWAYS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Identify and Manage Hazardous Defects in Your Trees

Unit E: Urban Forestry. Lesson 4: Pruning Trees in Urban Settings

TRCA Field Staking Protocol December 2016

Thursday, February 25, :00 pm to 3:00 pm. Classes will be held at: City Hall Annex Multi Purpose Room 300 N Lee Street Valdosta, GA 31601

Nate Hough-Snee ESRM 412 Plant Propagation Protocol One 11 APR 2007

A. Contractor shall provide product data for each type of product indicated.

International Tree Failure Database. User Manual. Prepared to accompany the International Tree Failure Database.

PROTECTED TREE REPORT

Sweet Cherry Rootstock Traits Lynn E. Long, Oregon State University

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Master Plan Objectives and Policies

Appendix 3 Photographs of Surveyed Trees

Pruning of Mature Trees. Some Basic Principles

University of Washington Botanic Gardens Collections Policy Revised February 6, 2018

Imua Landscaping Co. Inc.

International Green Roof City Network Case Study Seattle, Washington USA

TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH SAN MATEO COUNTY

University of Washington Botanic Gardens Collections Policy January 1, 2009

TAXONOMY Family Names Family Scientific Name: Scientific Names

RESOLUTION NO

Tree Compartmentalization: CODIT Model

Project Summary. Rationale

SECTION 4(f) DE MINIMIS DOCUMENTATION

Update for City Council 7 Years of Progress. May 2013

Coast Redwood Responses to Pruning

NOTICE OF INTENT TO REMOVE DECLINING CITY STREET TREES

Pebble Beach Community Services District

Pruning Landscape Plants

CMG GardenNotes #613 Structural Training of Young Shade Trees

trunks. The main difference between shrubs and trees is size; trees are typically larger than shrubs.

Pruning Blueberry Plants in Florida 1

TREES AND VIEWS: TREE MANAGEMENT + PRUNING

SOUTH SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT INTRODUCTION

DOWNLOAD OR READ : UNDER THE WEEPING TREE PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

San Francisco Bay Area Upland Habitat Goals Project

ecopro Sustainable Landscape Professional Certification REQUIRED READING LIST, SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS, & ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

Morro Shoulderband Snail Protocol Survey Report for the Parcel at 3093 Beachcomber Drive, Morro Bay, San Luis Obispo County, California

ATLAS, NEWCASTLE. (SP)A004 Scale ATLAS CONCEPT DESIGN FOR OCCUPANCY ARCHITECTURE, LLC. MATT KIRKPATRICK 1705 SE ASH STREET CONCEPT PAGE

PROTECTIVE MEASURES FOR TREES DURING CONSTRUCTION

Wisconsin NRCS Direct Volume Method Bank Recession Rate Categorizations

UNIT 1 SUSTAINING ECOSYSTEMS

City of Elmhurst. City of Elmhurst. Storm Sewer System Workshop November 22, 2010

Japanese Crape Myrtle Lagerstroemia fauriei 'Fantasy' Champion Crepe Myrtle. Pictures used with permission. Arboretum

Visual and Aesthetics

Water Wise Gardening. Jennifer Dornbush Sonoma County Master Gardener

Natural Target Pruning. Making Proper Pruning Cuts

AVONDALE ESTATES GREENSPACE AD-HOC COMMITTEE

SECTION TREE AND PLANT PROTECTION

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Spurge Laurel(Daphne laureola) (Family Thymelaeaceae Daphne Family)

2008 Annual report of the UT Presidents Commission on the River

Hydrologic Assessment of using Low Impact Development to Mitigate the Impacts of Climate Change. Chris Jensen, AScT Master of Science Thesis

Selecting Quality Trees from the Nursery. Created from research by Dr. Edward F. Gilman and Traci Partin (University of Florida)

SECTION 808 PLANTING TREES, SHRUBS AND OTHER PLANTS

Comprehensive Plan ADOPTED APRIL 2014

Goals of the Program 4/24/2014

DUPAGE COUNTY WASTE AND RECYCLING REPORT 2017

CONSERVATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

MORE POINSETTIAS are grown than any

DATE: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 24, 2016

ARTICLE II. LANDSCAPING

Practicum Division of Herbaceous Perennials. Division of Hosta

SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT

IV.B. VISUAL RESOURCES

2007 GREAT SOUTHERN TREE CONFERENCE

GREATER CHARLOTTE CHAPTER

6H NDJ H6L biotic abiotic biomes Evidence

Evaluation of How O&M Costs Vary for Alternative Flood Control Strategies

California Avocado Society 1955 Yearbook 39: PHOSPHATE RESPONSE IN AVOCADO TREES

Transcription:

Structural failure profile: Monterey Cypress (Hesperocyparis macrocarpa) L. R. Costello and K. S. Jones Each year, the structural failure of trees in urban and forested recreation areas results in personal injuries and property damage. A key objective of a tree management program is to reduce the potential for failure to the extent possible. One important element of failure reduction strategies is to prevent or mitigate conditions that may lead to failure, such as pruning branches weakened by wood decay, cabling or bracing, and avoiding root damage. All tree species do not fail in similar ways, however. Some are prone to fail as a result of weak architecture, such as codominant stems. Others have a greater propensity to fail because they develop large end-weights on branches exceeding the load tolerance of the wood. Knowing the particular failure patterns or traits of species can help tree managers identify key defects that may lead to failure. By collecting detailed information following the failure of a tree, data can be compiled and then used to develop structural failure profiles for a species. Such a profile has been developed here for Monterey cypress (Hesperocyparis macrocarpa, formerly Cupressus macrocarpa) using data from the California Tree Failure Report Program (CTFRP). s and foresters can use this information to develop structural management strategies for coast live oak. The development of this profile was commissioned by the Britton Fund of the Western Chapter of ISA. Monterey cypress distribution A California native tree, Monterey cypress occurs on the Pacific Coast in two groves, at Cypress Point (Pebble Beach) and Point Lobos (Carmel). It is a commonly planted landscape tree in California, performing best near the coast (Fig. 1). Monterey cypress is included in the California Native Plant Society s Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants. General statistics Tree failures can be divided into 3 groups based on the part that fails: branch, trunk, and root. Of the 463 reports for Monterey cypress, 222 are branch failures (48%), 82 trunk failures (18%), and 159 root failures (34%). The majority of failures (80%) occur on trees ranging from 26 to 100 years old (Table 1). Although failures were reported in 12 counties, 72% were from San Francisco, with the majority (67%) occurring during the months of November, December, and January. Failed trees occurred principally in groups (69%) in medium to high use areas (78%). Aside from decay, key defects across all types include heavy lateral limbs (27%), multiple trunks/codominant stems (15%), and dense crown (11%). A. BRANCH FAILURE Branch failure was the principal type of failure for Monterey cypress: 222 cases or 48% of all failures. Branch failure location Branch failures can occur either at the point of attachment to the trunk or along the branch (Fig. 2). The majority of failures occurred along the branch for Monterey cypress (69%), while the remainder occurred at the attachment. For failures along the branch, distance from the point of attachment ranged from 1 to 12 feet for 72% of cases. Diameter of failed branches was highest (63%) in the 5- to 12-inch diameter range. s and branch failures Heavy lateral limbs (end weight), multiple branches/ codominant stems, and dense crown were the leading Table 1. General statistics for all failure types. Table 2. s reported associated with branch failures. Variable Mean Age Height DBH Crown spread 66 years 68 feet 40 inches 42 feet Heavy lateral limbs 54% Multiple branches/codominant stems 15% Dense crown 9% None 4% 50

Figure 1. (Left) Although native stands are very limited in California, Monterey cypress is commonly planted in parks, golf courses, and urban landscapes. Figure 2. (Center) Many branch failures of Monterey cypress occur along the branch (arrow), commonly associated with heavy end weights and dense crowns. Figure 3. (Right) The majority of branch failures are sound wood failures. By collecting detailed information following the failure of a tree, data can be compiled and then used to develop structural failure profiles for a species. structural defects associated with branch failures (Table 2). Acting in concert with these defects, additional loads caused by wind and rain contribute substantially to branch failures. Decay and branch failures No decay was reported in the majority (74%) of branch failures (Fig. 3). Ostensibly, these failures occur along the branch and are associated with heavy end-weights. Assessments of the cross-sectional area with decay are given in 45 reports. Of these, the majority of cases (60%) indicate that less than 25% of the cross-sectional area was decayed (Table 3). Wind and branch failures The majority of Monterey cypress branch failures (50%) occur during high wind conditions, while 34% occur during moderate wind, and 16% during low wind (Table 4). Precipitation and branch failures Most branch failures (78%) occurred during wet conditions (rain, fog or mist). The remainder occurred during dry conditions. B. TRUNK FAILURE Of the 3 failure types, trunk failure was least frequently reported, amounting to 18% of all reports. Most failures occurred above ground level (79%), with the remainder occurring at ground level (Fig. 4). Trunk diameter at the Table 3. Cross-sectional area of branch with decay and failure occurrence. < 25% 59% 26-50% 22% 51-76% 17% > 76% 2% 51

Figure 4. (Left) Most trunk failures of Monterey cypress occur above the ground line, typically associated with high wind and rainfall. Figure 5. (Right) Multiple stems is a key structural defect leading to trunk failure in Monterey cypress. break ranged from 6 to 54 inches, with the majority (63%) in the 13- to 30-inch diameter range. Key defects associated with trunk failures include multiple stems/codominant stems (Fig. 5), dense crown, and cracks/splits (Table 5.) Decay and trunk failure Decay was reported to be a contributing factor in 63% of all trunk failures. Assessments of the cross-sectional area Table 4. Wind speed and branch failure. Low wind (<5 mph) 16% Moderate wind (5-25 mph) 34% High wind (>25 mph) 50% of occurrence Table 6. Cross-sectional area of trunk with decay and failure occurrence. < 25% 41% 26-50% 37% 51-76% 17% > 76% 5% with decay were given in 46 reports. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the trunk affected by decay varied considerably from less than 25% to greater than 76% (Table 6). Over 78% of failures occurred when decay was less than 50% of the cross-sectional area (Fig. 6) Precipitation and trunk failures Most trunk failures (75%) occurred during rainfall events, Table 5. s reported to be associated with trunk failures. Multiple stems/codominant stems 47% Dense crown 10% Cracks/splits 10% Table 7. Wind speed and trunk failure. Low wind (<5 mph) 11% Moderate wind (5-25 mph) 28% High wind (>25 mph) 61% of occurrence 52

Figure 6. (Left) Decay is associated with 63% of trunk failures, but less than half of the cross-sectional area is decayed in 78% of cases. Figure 7. (Center) Root failures are the second most frequent failure type for Monterey cypress. High wind and rain commonly contribute to root failures. Figure 8. (Right) Dense crown and kinked/girdling roots frequently contribute to root failures. while the remainder (25%) occurred when conditions were dry. Wind and trunk failures As with branch failures, the majority of trunk failures occurred under high wind conditions (61%). During moderate and low wind conditions, 28% and 11% of failures were reported to have occurred (Table 7). C. ROOT FAILURE Following branch failure, root failure was the second most common failure type reported for Monterey cypress (Fig. 7). Failed trees ranged in age from less than 10 years to more than 200 years, with the majority (79%) being 26 to 100 years old. decay ranged from less than 25% to more than 76%, with the majority (69%) having less than 50% (Table 9). Wind and root failures High winds (> 25 mph) contributed to 79% of root failures (Table 10). Few cases occurred during low wind conditions (4%), while 17% occurred during moderate wind conditions. Figure 9. Rainfall and high winds contribute to many root failures of Monterey cypress. s and root failures No defects were noted in 25% of all root failures for Monterey cypress. Where defects were noted, dense crown and kinked/girdling roots were the most common type (Table 8) (Fig. 8). Decay and root failures Decay was associated with 39% of root failures. The majority of failures (61%) occurred with no signs of decay noted. For roots with decay, the cross-sectional area (CSA) of Table 8. Structural defects associated with root failures. Dense crown 19% Kinked/girdling roots 19% One-sided crown 9% Multiple trunks 9% Table 9. Cross-sectional area of root with decay and frequency of occurrence. < 25% 30% 26-50% 39% 51-75% 18% > 76% 13% 53

Table 10. Wind and root failure Low (<5 mph) 4% Moderate (5-25 mph) 17% High (>25 mph) 79% Precipitation and root failures The majority of root failure cases (87%) in Monterey cypress are associated with rainfall events (Fig. 9). Few failures (17%) occur when conditions are dry. Summary of key findings: Branch failure (48%) was the most common type of failure for Monterey cypress, followed by root (34%) and trunk (18%). High wind was reported in 79% of root failures, 61% of trunk failures, and 50% of branch failures. Precipitation was reported to contribute to 87% of root failures, 75% of trunk failures, and 78% of branch failures. Although decay was associated with 63% of trunk failures, no decay was reported in 74% of branch failures and 61% root failures. Less than 50% of the cross-sectional area was noted to be decayed in 81% of branch failures, 78% of trunk failures, and 69% of root failures. Branch failures occur most frequently along the branch (69%), and less frequently at the attachment (31%). Heavy lateral limbs, multiple branches/codominant stems, and dense crown are key defects associated with branch failure. Most trunk failures occur above the ground line (79%) in the 13- to 30-inch DBH size class. Key defects associated with trunk failures include multiple stems/codominant stems, dense crown, and cracks/splits No defects were reported for many root failures (61%). When defects were noted, dense crown and kinked/girdling roots were most common. L. R. Costello Oracle Oak K. S. Jones CTFRP Database Manager 2014 ASCA Annual Conference December 3 6, 2014 Westin Mission Hills Resort Palm Springs, California Co-Sponsors Pacific Northwest Chapter ISA Western Chapter ISA Make plans now to attend ASCA s Annual Conference the only conference designed to help you expand your career as a Consulting. Not only will you be exposed to education you can t find anywhere else, but you also will gain access to the best resources in the industry our attendees. Western Chapter ISA members receive a discounted registration fee. asca2014.org 54