J,1. Newmarket INFORMATION REPORT DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES/PLANNING &BUILDING SERVICES PLANNING REPORT Purpose of this Report

Similar documents
Town of Newmarket 395 Mulock Drive P.O. Box 328, Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 4X7. Website: newmarket.ca Phone:

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

CITY CLERK. Parkland Acquisition Strategic Directions Report (All Wards)

ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD

Report to: Development Services Committee Report Date: September 11, 2017

PROPOSED SOUTHWEST SUTTON DEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN & A SETTLEMENT PROPOSAL RESPECTING AN OMB APPEAL AGAINST THE SUTTON/JACKSON S POINT SECONDARY PLAN

The Regional Municipality of Halton. Chair and Members of the Planning and Public Works Committee

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

Official Plan Review

6 Growth Management Challenges and Opportunities

Development Services Committee Update. Markham Parks Acquisition, Development and. Improvement Plan

Transforming Saint John s Urban Heart -

8 Oak Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

South of Eastern Strategic Direction Status Update

Re: Hazeldean Road - Minto Potters Key Subdivision Responses to Resident Concerns

Leonard s Beach Secondary Plan (Alcona North) Official Plan Amendment

Planning and Growth Management Committee. Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division. Pg12013 (File No NNY 34 OZ)

Urban Design Review Panel Terms of Reference

Executive Summary.. 1. Introduction

Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act 844 Don Mills Road and 1150 Eglinton Avenue East

The Corporation of the TOWN OF MILTON

646 Kingston Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

MAYFIELD WEST SECONDARY PLAN PHASE 2

5 TOWN OF MARKHAM OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 144 MILLIKEN MAIN STREET SECONDARY PLAN

Area-Specific Amendment to Chapter 694 Concerning the Display of Topiary Signs at Woodbine Racetrack. Planning and Growth Management Committee

6 CATHEDRAL COMMUNITY SECONDARY PLAN OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT 123 TOWN OF MARKHAM

REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

9 CITY OF VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO BOCA EAST INVESTMENTS LIMITED

Chair and Members of the Planning, Public Works and Transportation Committee. Tara Buonpensiero, Senior Planner Policy, MCIP, RPP

Eco-Roof Incentive Program application: 77 Glen Rush Boulevard

Parks Master Plan Implementation: Phase I Waterfront Use and Design REPORT #: September 7, 2016 File #

SUBJECT: Proposed Downtown Mobility Hub Precinct Plan and Proposed Official Plan Policies

Tippett Road Area Regeneration Study Final Report. Planning and Growth Management Committee

Queen Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

LAND USE AMENDMENT CORNERSTONE (WARD 3) COUNTRY HILLS BOULEVARD AND STONEY TRAIL NE BYLAW 9D2017

The Corporation of the Town of Milton

REPORT SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MEETING DATE: MAY 2, Five Year Review of the 2012 Parks, Recreation and Library Facilities Master Plan

REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT

Hamilton Pier 7&8 Draft Urban Design Plan

11 APPEAL BY LEBOVIC ENTERPRISES INC. AND REVLIS LTD. TO OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT D , TOWN OF AURORA

REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT

MOUNT PLEASANT SECONDARY PLAN & VILLAGE BLOCK PLAN. Wednesday, March 5, 2008 Informal Public Open House

ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD

12 AMENDMENT NO. 149, TOWN OF MARKHAM HIGHWAY 404 NORTH SECONDARY PLAN

112 College Street Zoning Amendment Application Preliminary Report

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION 2016 November 03. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

John M. Fleming Managing Director, Planning and City Planner. Old East Village Dundas Street Corridor Secondary Plan Draft Terms of Reference

City Council - Planning Meeting Agenda

333 College Street and 303 Augusta Avenue - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

KANATA CENTRUM 255 KANATA AVENUE OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT

THAT the attached Terms of Reference for the Thornhill Centre Street Study be approved.

Figure 1- Site Plan Concept

13 THORNHILL YONGE STREET STUDY IMPLEMENTATION CITY OF VAUGHAN OPA 669 AND TOWN OF MARKHAM OPA 154

5959 Yonge Street Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report

PG18.2 REPORT FOR ACTION. Eco-Roof Incentive Program application: 50 Drummond Street SUMMARY

Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission

Planning Primer Legislative Background, Policy Documents and Development Review Processes. Presented by: Planning Services Date: April 6, 2017

Paul D. Ralph, BES, RPP, MCIP, Commissioner, Development Services Department. Proposed Storm Water Pond Maintenance Fee

599 Kennedy Road Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment Request for Directions Report

Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building. Land Use Review- Former Parkway Belt West Lands- Fieldgate Drive and Audubon Boulevard

By Only to

PRIORITIES COMMITTEE MEETING

350, 370, and 390 Queens Quay West Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

and Richmond Street West - Official Plan Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

30 and 44 Zorra Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Update on Angus Glen. Community Park. Development Services Committee. December 6, Part A ANGUS GLEN PARK MASTER PLAN. Town of Markham & LA+ED

ADOPTION OF THE REVISED OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN

114 Richmond Road Les Soeurs De La Visitation D'Ottawa. Community Discussion

SUBJECT: Supplementary Information and Directions Regarding the Proposed Downtown Mobility Hub Precinct Plan and Proposed Official Plan Policies

150 Eighth Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 6, 2014

LAND USE AMENDMENT CORNERSTONE (WARD 3) 60 STREET NE AND COUNTRY HILLS BOULEVARD NE MAP 26NE BYLAW 22D2017

Amendment to the Green Roof Bylaw for Public and Separate School Board Buildings

2900 Steeles Avenue East at Don Mills Road in the Town of Markham

6 AMENDMENT NO. 637 TO THE VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN (VAUGHAN 400 NORTH EMPLOYMENT AREA SECONDARY PLAN)

60-64 Queen Street East and Church Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WINDSOR Office of the City Solicitor Planning Department

Draft Amendment Provides details regarding ROPA 47 s purpose and effect. Related Processes Highlights other ongoing processes of note in the area

Don Mills Crossing Study and Celestica Lands Development Application Community Meeting, Open House, and Breakout Discussions

Mill Woods Town Centre Proposed Rezoning LDA

Community Consultation Meeting

SUMMER VILLAGE OF SUNRISE BEACH

PARKS AND RECREATION

Committee of the Whole Report

Silver Line CPAM UPDATE. Transportation and Land Use Committee October 14, 2016

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE GEORGE KOTSIFAS MANAGING DIRECTOR, DEVELOPMENT & COMPLIANCE SERVICES & CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL

Report to: Development Services Committee Report Date: April 24, 2017

SUBJECT: GO Station Mobility Hubs Preferred Concepts: Aldershot GO, Burlington GO and Appleby GO. Planning and Development Committee - Public Meeting

PDS June 1, 2016 Page 1. Planning and Development Committee. MEETING DATE: Wednesday, June 01, 2016

49 to 51 Camden St - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER

Report Regarding Site Plan Control for 55 Wellspring Way (File No. SP-06-16)

STAFF REPORT. December 20, North York Community Council. Director, Community Planning, North York District

1120 Haist Street - Pelham Arena Community Co-Design Recommendation Report Haist Street - Pelham Arena Community Co-Design Recommendation Report

PO Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada. Mayor Kelly and Members of Halifax Regional Council

TOWN OF INNISFIL SPECIAL COUNCIL AGENDA OUR JOBS INNISFIL HEIGHTS WORKSHOP WEDNESDAY JANUARY 20, :30 P.M.

Eco-Roof Incentive Program application: 6 Curity Avenue

Master Environmental Servicing Plan & Secondary Plan

Rowntree Mill Road Zoning and Plan of Subdivision Applications Final Report

Transcription:

J,1 Newmarket DEVELOPMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES/PLANNING & BUILDING SERVICES TOWN OF NEWMARKET 395 M ulock Drive www.newmarket.ca P.O. Box 328 planning@newmarket.ca Newmarket, ON L3Y 4X7905.895.5193 INFORMATION REPORT DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES/PLANNING &BUILDING SERVICES PLANNING REPORT 2014-47 December 15, 2014 TO: Mayor Van Bynen Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer SLT SUBJECT: ORIGIN: Alternative Parkland Dedication Scenarios Planning and Building Services Purpose of this Report The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of how future parkland in the Newmarket Urban Centres Secondary Plan and other planned intensification may be required and funded. This information will assist Council in its consideration of strategic property acquisitions, particularly within the Urban Centres. The report provides a comparison of the land and/or cash in lieu generated by the current residential 5 % parkland dedication vs a number of possible alternative parkland dedication scenarios. This information is being circulated in anticipation of a Parkland Dedication Bylaw being presented for Council's consideration in 2015 to meet the needs of existing and future residents within the Urban Centres and other new developments within th e Town. In accordance with the Procedural By-law, any member of Council may request that this Information Report be placed on an upcoming Committee of the Whole Agenda for discussion. Background Planning Act was amended in 1990 to provide for alternative parkland dedication in recognition that the 5 % parkland dedication, which typically applied to ground related greenfield plans of subdivision, was not sufficient for higher density urban form development. It was apparent that parkland inequities was being created as significantly less park space was being provided to higher density development, notwithstanding the reduced private open space associated with

this form of development (e.g., apartments and townhomes typically have limited private amenity space in the form of balconies of backyards and therefore would have more reliance on public spaces). OPA # 7 to the Town's Official Plan In August 2012, Amendment# 7 to the Town's Official Plan was approved and included the provision for alternative parkland dedication up to 1 ha per 300 dwelling units for "parks or other public recreational purposes" as provided for in the Planning Act( Section 42(3). This provision is required to be contained in Official Plans to enable municipalities to implement an Alternative Parkland Dedication By-law. The inclusion of this provision in the Official Plan received no appeals to the OMB. An Alternative Parkland Dedication By-law is under preparation by staff and is expected to be brought forward in 2015 for Council's approval. There is no appeal to the OMB of Council's decision to adopt a Parkland Dedication By-law. The Parks Policy Development Manual The Parks Policy Development Manual was adopted by Council in November 2012 and establishes standards for parkland to apply Townwide, as follows: Town Parks - 1.0 ha per 1,000 residents Community Parks - 0.5 ha per 1,000 residents Neighbourhood Parks - 0.7 ha per 1,000 residents Urban Squares and Plazas - combined with Neighbourhood Parks Passive Green Space - by opportunity (not at the expense of active parkland) Within the Urban Centres, only the Neighbourhood Parks standard has been applied for the purpose of determining the minimum Neighbourhood Parks required to serve the planned 33,000 residents within the Urban Centres. Based on the Parks Policy Development Manual standard of 0. 7 ha per 1000 residents, approximately 23.1 ha will be required in the form of Neighbourhood Parks to serve the future residents. Additional Community and Town Parks will be required to meet the Town wide standard, which will serve the Town as a whole, including the Urban Centre residents. Comments Table 1 provides a summary of the parkland requirements and cash in lieu equivalent within the Urban Centres based on the existing 5 % parkland dedication in comparison to a number of Alternative Parkland Dedication scenarios. The salient points of Table 1 are summarized below: 1 The minimum Neighbourhood Parkland requirement is 23.1 ha in keeping with the Neighbourhood Parkland standard (0. 7 ha per 1000 residents). 2

2 Based on 2013 cost of land assumptions the cost of the land alone would be in the range of $86.7 /$92.4 million. 3 The application of the current 5 % parkland dedication provisions would only require that 8 ha of parkland be dedicated (well below the parkland standard) - a shortfall of 15.1 ha, and a cash equivalent of $30 mill - a shortfall of $66. 7 million. 4 The 5 % parkland dedication would not generate the required Neighbourhood Parkland to meet the Parkland standard of 0.7 ha per 1000 residents by build-out. 5 The cost of the 23.1 ha of parkland identified in Table 1 ($86. 7/92.4 million) is the cost of land only and does not include: the cost of developing the park and associated landscaping, or land required for other recreational purposes. 6. The Alternative Parkland scenarios are provided to demonstrate the potential land requirement and equivalent cash in lieu under four (4) potential alternative parkland dedication by-law provisions. Scenario 4 approximates the land requirement for Neighbourhood Parks only and does not include the cost of the other components identified in item 5 above. 7. The scenarios are provided for demonstration purposes only and have not considered the cost of developing the parks and or "other public recreational purposes". The Parkland Dedication Bylaw, prepared for Council's consideration, will be supported by a clear rationale for the recommended provisions of the by-law to meet the needs and associated costs for parkland and "other public recreational purposes". However, it is apparent from Table 1 that substantially more land and revenue will be generated through an Alternative Parkland Dedication By-law than the current 5 % approach and will provide more assurance that the parkland and other public recreational needs as defined by the Town will be met. Table 2 illustrates how the 4 alternative parkland dedications scenarios would compare to the current 5 % parkland dedication for 3 higher density development scenarios within the Urban Centres. HUMAN RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS None applicable to this report. BUDGET IMPACT None applicable to this report. 3

CONTACT For more information on this report, contact Marion Plaunt, Senior Planner, Policy at 905 953 5300 x 2459 or at mplaunt@newmarket.ca. Marion Plaunt, MES, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner - Policy Planning & Building Services nger, B.E.S. Assistant Director of Planning Planning & Building Services Richar~ S., MCIP, RPP Peter Noehammer, P.Eng Director of Planning & Building Services Commissioner Development and Infrastructure Services 4

Table 1 Newmarket Urban Centres Parkland Requirements and Potential Cash in Lieu Generated by Future Development Based on Alternative Parkland Dedication By-law Scenarios Time Frame Projected Residents Units Neighbourhood Parkland 1 Standard 0.7 ha/1000 residents Developable Area 160 ha Current 5 % Parkland Dedication based of 160 ha of developable area Scenario 1 1ha/300 units (Maximum standard permitted by the Planning Act) Scenario 2 1ha/400 units Scenario 3 1 ha/500 units Scenario 4 1ha/600. 2 units Build-out Cost of Land Assumption (2013) 33,000 residents 15,900 units Build out 23.1 ha $86.7 /$92.4 Mill 8.0 ha $30/32 Mill 53 ha $193.75/$212 Mill 39. 75 ha $149 /$1 59 Mill 31.8 ha $119.25 /$127.2 Mill 26.5 ha $100/$106 Mill $3. 75 Mill 1$4 Mill per ha 1 Only the Neighbourhood Parkland standard of 0.7 ha per 1000 residents from the Parks Policy Development Manual has been applied in this chart as la rger scale Community and Town Parks will generally need to be accommodated outside the Urban Centres. 2 The above chart includes 4 Scenarios as examples of the revenue generated through an Alternative Pa rkland Dedication By-law. For the purpose of this illustration, the complete cost of parks and "other public recreational purposes" permitted by the Planning Act have not been included. Only the cost of the Neighbourhood Parkland acquisition has been include for this exercise. The analysis for t he Parkland Dedication Bylaw will need to take into consideration the cost of the actual development of the parks, (e.g., park facilities, landscaping, etc.), other the land or development for "public recreational purposes" such as recreational facilities, or the cost of trails and their development. A complete analysis will be required for the development of the Parkland Dedication By-law to finally determine the appropriate parkland dedication standards for Newmarket. The need and cost of other public recreational uses will be based primarily on the Recreational Master Plan currently under study, and trail development e.g. trails proposed through the Active Transportation Network, Trail Master Plan(to be developed) and the connectivity required by the Secondary Plan.

Table 2 Examples of the Application of the Current 5 %Parkland Dedication Relative to an Number of Alternative Parkland Dedication Scenarios that may be Included in the Future Alternative Parkland Dedication By-law Examples of Proposed Development Cash in Lieu is based on the following ranges (2013): $3. 75 mill. /$4.0 mill. per ha Current 5 % Parkland Designation Scenario 1 1 ha/300 units (Maximum standard permitted by the Planning Act) I Scenario 2 I 1 ha/400 units Scenario 3 1 ha/500 units Scenario 4 1 ha/600 units 200 Unit Development on 1 ha I I - - I I Parkland Dedication in ha I o.o5 ha 0.666 ha 0.5 ha 0.4 ha 0.333 ha Cash in Lieu ($3. 75 mill. /$4.0 mill. per ha) $187,500 I $200,000 $2. 5 / $2.66 Mill $1.875 / $2.0 Mill $1.5 /$1.6 Mill $1.25 / $1.33 Mill 40 Unit Development on 0.3 ha Parkland Dedication in ha I o.015 ha 0.1333 ha 0.1 ha I0.08 ha I0.06 ha Cash in Lieu ($3. 75 mill. /$4.0 mill. per ha ) I S56,25otS6o,ooo $500,000/ $533,200 $375,000/$400,000 $300,000/ $320,000 $225,000/ $240,000 360 unit on 1 ha Parkland Dedication in ha Cash in Lieu ($3. 75 mill. /$4.0 mill. per ha ) 0.05 ha $187,500/$200,000 1.2 ha $4. 5/$4.8 Mill 0.9 ha $3.375 / $3.6 Mill 0.72 ha $2.7/$2.88 Mill 0.6 ha $2. 25 / $2.4 Mill 7