Market to Market Update MISO-SPP JOA Stakeholder Meeting August 13, 2015 MISO Office Carmel, IN 1
Outline Status of how Market-to-Market (M2M) is working Objectives of M2M Number of M2M flowgates On-going M2M Resettlement Discussions M2M Event Issue Next Steps 2
Market to Market (M2M) Objectives More efficient re-dispatch solution for coordinated constraints across multiple systems More consistent pricing profile across the two (2) Markets Enhanced system reliability by pooling Resources from both RTOs to jointly control transmission constraints near the RTO border Compensation mechanism provided for two-market congestion management 3
Market-to-Market Stats 1 Currently 135 SPP-MISO M2M permanent flowgates 46 SPP, 89 MISO Currently 45 SPP-MISO M2M temporary flowgates 32 SPP, 13 MISO Total number of M2M events: 243 MISO as MRTO: 117, SPP as MRTO: 126 Total number of hours in M2M: 1024 MISO as MRTO: 526, SPP as MRTO: 656 Total dollar flow from SPP to MISO: $2.2 Million Total dollar flow from MISO to SPP: $10.4 Million 1 Data as of July 27 2015 4
Market-to-Market Stats 1 1 Data as of July 27 2015 5
Market-to-Market Stats 1 Top 10 Flowgates MISO pays SPP Flowgate Description FG ID FG Owner Settled Dollars No. of Hours CouncilBluffs_Sub3456_345_ftlo_RollingHills_MadisonCounty345 5501 SWPP $3,115,305 43 Arkansas_PleasantHills500kv_ftlo_Arkansas_Mabelvale500kv 1967 MISO $1,305,401 201 Cooper_St_Joe_345kV_ftlo_Cooper_Fairport_345kV 20835 SWPP $1,230,621 94 S1226_Tekamah_161kV_flo_S3451_Raun_345kV 6126 SWPP $1,127,920 37 IATSTRSTJHAW 5228 SWPP $648,727 80 Fort_Smith_500_161_XF_ftlo_Lydia_Valliant_345_kV 21076 SWPP $622,906 33 Bull_Shoals_Midway_161_ftlo_Norfork_Buford_161 6723 MISO $612,003 12 COOPER_S 6009 SWPP $422,825 48 Lacygne_W_Gardner_345_kV_FLO_Lacygne_Stillwell_345_kV 21087 SWPP $256,208 56 TEMP03_Fort_Smith_500_161_kV_XFR_flo_Fort_Smith_500_345_k V_XFR 21012 SWPP $247,291 15 1 Data as of July 27 2015 6
Market-to-Market Stats 1 Top 10 Flowgates SPP pays MISO Flowgate Description FG ID FG Owner Settled Dollars No. of Hours TubularDobbin_138_ftlo_GrimesBentwater_138 6542 MISO $930,247 140 Cheetah_HotSprings_115kV_FLO_ANO_FtSmith500kV 6323 MISO $204,344 31 Tubular Dobbin_138_flo_GrimesWyntexHuntsvil_138 6546 MISO $174,563 15 Ringold_138_115_kV_AT1_flo_Sarepta_Longwood_345_kV 20734 MISO $128,436 15 Taylor_Springhill_115kV_flo_Eldorado_500_345_AT2 20983 MISO $125,955 6 S3458_S3456_345kV_FTLO_3458_103RD_Rokeby_345kV 20987 SWPP $101,651 36 Buckner_Spearvil_345kV_flo_Finney_Hitchland_345kV 20700 SWPP $93,180 62 Raun345_161kV_TR2_flo_Raun_SiouxCity_345 20852 MISO $88,363 10 SareptaMinden_115_ftlo_Dolet_Hills_345_230_T1 6334 MISO $69,466 9 Woodward_Altheimer_115kV_flo_Stuttgart_Woodward_230kV 21099 MISO $67,432 16 1 Data as of July 27 2015 7
M2M Weekly After-the Fact (ATF) Call SPP and MISO have weekly After-the-Fact (ATF) review calls where we both approve M2M events In addition to reviewing real-time operations of M2M events there is a review of the required data sharing processes to ensure MISO and SPP have the correct data to perform M2M settlements Example: Data exchange issues resulting in missing Firm Flow Entitlements required to perform M2M settlements MISO and SPP must agree before performing any settlements or adjustments 8
M2M Settlement Adjustments through 7/27 FG Operating Day M2M Settlement Adjustment after issuing S7 Reason for Adjustment SWPP_5426 3/3/2015 ($2,053) SWPP_20517 3/3/2015 $4,231 SWPP_5501 3/3/2015 $174,962 MISO_1967 3/16/2015 $30,002 SWPP_20517 3/16/2015 $11 MISO_1967 4/2/2015 $6,815 MISO_6723 4/2/2015 $74,515 SWPP_5228 4/5/2015 ($39,259) SWPP_20517 4/5/2015 $27,113 SWPP_20835 4/5/2015 $111,075 MISO_20852 4/8/2015 ($84,474) MISO_6723 4/8/2015 $478,654 SWPP_20835 5/10/2015 $99,490 Delayed exchange of M2M settlement data preventing review and approval before the S7 settlement statement. SWPP_20822 3/13/2015 $4,865 Corrected Market Flow value. MISO_20978 5/22/2015 ($7,101) Corrected FFE value. Positive values indicate MISO pays SPP 9
On-Going M2M Resettlement Discussions Flowgate Dates Description of Event 1 CouncilBluffs_Sub3456_345_ftl o_rollinghills_madisoncounty 345 (FG 5501) March 2-4, 6, 8, 11 Using market flow instead of total flow to control flowgate 2 Using different rating (close breaker rating) in real time as defined in Operating Guide than FFE calculation (open breaker rating) 3 4 Cooper South (FG 6009) March 18-22, 28-30, May 17 5 Cooper_St_Joe_345kV_ftlo_Co oper_fairport_345kv (FG 20835) 6 Bull_Shoals_Midway_161_ftlo_ Norfork_Buford_161 (FG 6723) April 11 April 8 Outage that impact the congestion was not included in the NNL/FFE calculation due to model issue Using lower rating in real time than indicated in operating guide. Same rating used in RT was used in NNL/FFE/AFC and planning models. Using market flow instead of total flow to control flowgate Declining to implement part of a standing operating guide to reconfigure the system due to other reliability concerns. Declining to call TLR when external parties have impacts on the flowgate. 7 S1226_Tekamah_161kV_flo_S3 451_Raun_345kV (FG 6126) May 19-20 Using flowgate (1226) as proxy to manage congestion on a different flowgate. It was also used to manage RT loading of the monitored facility. 10
Item Additional Discussion Items 1 M2M Flow Control Oscillation during M2M events 2 Flowgate Rating practices used in real-time versus Firm Flow Entitlement calculation 3 Firm Flow Entitlement recalculation criteria/procedure 4 Using M2M on flowgates that regularly relax during M2M events 5 M2M Flowgates where one or both RTOs have limited generation to move during M2M events 6 Changing Shadow Price Limits to alleviate competing constraints 7 M2M events where resource(s) is selfscheduled or offline 8 Level of detail to include in voltage/stability limited flowgate operating guides Description When the MRTO stops binding, MRTO sends a message to the NMRTO to stop binding. The NMRTO can then reload on the flowgate causing the MRTO to bind on the flowgate again. When this happens repeatedly, it can cause flowgate loading oscillations Develop best practices when an RTO should use a different real-time rating than the rating use in NNL/AFC/FFE/Planning Models Develop criteria when it is appropriate to recalculate FFE due to modeling issues, outages, etc. Develop criteria over the usage of M2M when one or both RTOs do not have effective control of the flowgate (continuously relaxing) causing constant price separation Develop criteria over the usage of M2M when one or both RTOs do not have effective control of the flowgate (does not continuously relax) causing oscillation price separation Develop criteria over the usage of M2M when multiple flowgates compete with each other. For example, relieving congestion on one flowgate causes an congestion on another flowgate Develop criteria over the usage of M2M when a resource or fleet of resource that contribute to congestion or can provide relief are offline (via outage or not committed) or not dispatchable by SCED The MRTO should provide sufficient detail in op guides of voltage/stability limited flowgates such that the NMRTO can verify the flowgates are not being used as proxies during M2M. 9 M2M Settlement Invoice and Payment Timeline There are differences in the MISO and SPP settlement billing cycles that introduces challenges for M2M settlements to ensure SPP remains revenue neutral. MISO and SPP have and will continue to discuss solutions to address SPP s concerns. 11
Contact Information MISO Yong Jiang (yjiang@misoenergy.org) SPP Gerardo Ugalde gugalde@spp.org) 12