Foam Solutions, LLC Performance Parkway, Columbus, Ohio Ph ; Fax

Similar documents
WILLIAM HICKS. MSc, CFEI, CFPS, IAAI-CFI, MIFireE, EFO, CFOD, F-IAFI. Associate Professor Eastern Kentucky University

Foam Products ENGLISH

TECHNICAL DATA OBSOLETE

SECURITY BLANKET Foam Fire Protection Products

Foam Systems U.S. Quick Reference Guide

Technical Article. High Expansion Foam Systems. Martin Workman Viking Product Manager. September,

A.U.P.C.I ASOCIACIÓN URUGUAYA DE PROTECCION CONTRA INCENDIO AUPCI

TECHNICAL DATA 3% AR-AFFF

Self Expanding Foam Fire Suppression System SPECIFICATION SHEET Rev

A Building Manager s Guide to Maintaining Fire Code Compliance

II Brazilian Sprinkler Conference October 27-28, 2016

Second Revision No. 11-NFPA [ Section No. 2.4 ] Submitter Information Verification. Committee Statement

Module 3. Water-Based Suppression Systems (WBSS) Part II: Highlights of Code Requirements

POLY extinguishing systems. The high-performance, unique, and versatile extinguishing system for initial, effective fire fighting.

MODULE 2. Water-Based Suppression System Basics

Water Mist Fire Suppression

The Next Generation of Foam Fire Suppression. Automatic CAF Fire hose reel system FEATURES

UFGS (June 2006) UNIFIED FACILITIES GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS

INSTRUCTOR GUIDE COURSE: FIREFIGHTER PRE-BASIC SESSION REFERENCE: 1 TOPIC: ORIENTATION AND FIRE BEHAVIOR LEVEL OF INSTRUCTION:

Hazard Control Technologies, Inc.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HANDBOOK COVERED STORAGE 1. THE FOLLOWING PAGES OF MIL-HDBK-1032/2 HAVE BEEN REVISED AND SUPERSEDE THE PAGES LISTED:

Technical Article. Foam Systems - Low Expansion, Medium Expansion, High Expansion. Martin Workman, Product Manager Special Hazards Division

Airport Firefighter Recertification Core Competency Task Book

UNIFIED FACILITIES GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS

FOAM CHAMBER MODEL - FCA & FCA-S HD FIRE PROTECT PVT. LTD. TECHNICAL DATA FEATURES APPLICATION

Chapter 3 FF II Fire Department Communications

MSC Guidelines for Foam Fire Suppression Systems

Reducing the Cost and Risk of Dust Collection in Coal

Table OUT OF SERVICE. Building Fire Video 1/15/ Inspection, testing and maintenance. Standards Further Referenced by FCNYS

The Combustion Process THE FIRE TETRAHEDRON FUEL TEMPERATURE

5.0 CONTINGENCY PLAN. It is necessary to amend the plan if:

FOAM CHAMBER MODEL - FCA & FCA-S TECHNICAL DATA FEATURES APPLICATION. Carbon Steel Construction FCA-65, FCA-80 & FCA-100. Stainless Steel Construction

The requirements of BS Watermist Fire System standard and how to demonstrate compliance

FoamFatale INTRODUCTION OF A NOVEL HIGH END TECHNOLOGY FOR LARGE ATMOSPHERIC STORAGE TANK FIRES. TFEX 1 Ltd.

The Antifreeze Fire Sprinkler System Dilemma Eliminating One Issue has Opened the Door to Another. Jennifer Poynter, Esq. Charles B.

SPECIFICATION: CARBON DIOXIDE ENGINEERED FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM

A HISTORICAL REVIEW OF FLUORINATED FOAM FIREFIGHTING AGENTS, PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS/ ENVIRONMENTAL SAFEGUARDS REVIEW

D. Reference Standards (Utilize latest editions available):

The development Of the new CEN standard For fire fighting foam systems EN13565 Part 2

SPECIFICATION: ECS SERIES CLEAN AGENT FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM

SPECIFICATION: ARGONITE Engineered Fire Suppression System

Design & Construction Standards, Revised January

TWO TIMES THE FIGHT Twin-Agent Fire Suppression Systems

Antibiotic production by fermentation

Revision May All designs must be submitted to FM Global for review and approval prior to issuing such for bids.

Summary. firefighter training in Since that time the firefighter had attended semi-annual

BUILDING CODE INTERPRETATION

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT of FORESTRY and FIRE PROTECTION OFFICE OF THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL UL 300

MAINTENANCE AND INPSECTION OF FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND APPLIANCES

New Construction Fire Inspection Process

Public Comment No. 2-NFPA [ Section No ]

Based on NFPA 1001: Standard for Fire Fighter Professional Qualifications, 2013 Edition.

SPECIFICATION: Kidde Engineered Fire Suppression System Designed for use with 3M Novec 1230 Fire Protection

High-expansion foam plant UNI EN 13565

A. NFPA 2001 Standard for Clean Agent Fire Extinguishing Systems 2004 edition.

Setting the Standard in Third-party Certification

Summary. Introduction

HIGH-EXPANSION FOAM GENERATORS

TN-25 Tunnel Fire Protection System. Safer. Smarter. Tyco.

CAN/ULC-S INTEGRATED SYSTEMS TESTING OF FIRE PROTECTION AND LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS

Tel Web: dyayan.com

EXHIBIT G REFRIGERANT MANAGEMENT POLICY

Title: Fire Protection Effective Date: 7/1/2013 Control Number: THG_0039 Revision Number: 1 Date: 10/23/2015 Annual Review Completed: 5/13/2015

junctioncrew.com FR28 INNOVATIVE PERFORMANCE MADE SIMPLE SUREFIRE SUREFIRE BLOCK HEATER THE INDUSTRY S STRONGEST WARRANTY HOSE HEATER

C. All components of the systems described shall meet the requirements as stated herein and shall be approved by the Architect and Consultant.

Above Ground Fuel Tank Requirements

Linear Heat Detection Engineering Specifications

Storage Protection Using Horizontal Barriers and Large K-Factor, Extended Coverage In-Rack Sprinklers

International Fire Code 2006 Requirements for Construction Plan Reviews of Commercial and Multi-Family Structures

CAN/ULC S Integrated Systems Testing of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems and Fire Protection Commissioning

AUTOMATIC FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS

150 & 200 RT MG-SERIES GAS FIRED DOUBLE-EFFECT EFFECT ABSORPTION CHILLER-HEATER

The 2012 Fire Suppression Rating Schedule (FSRS)

Portable Fire Extinguishers

The Science Behind Water Mist Protection of Typical Building Hazards

Making sense of risk Risk engineering. Metalworking operations

SPECIFICATION: DRY CHEMICAL FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM FOR INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS MODEL IND

NFPA 2001: Standard for Clean Agent Fire Extinguishing Systems NFPA 70: National Electrical Code (NEC) NFPA 72: National Fire Alarm Code

Talking about NFPA History of NFPA NFPA Standard 1710: Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, EMS

Minimum Standards for Engineers Practicing Fire Protection Engineering in the State of Oklahoma September 14, 2016

HKIE CPD Training Course (II) 23, 25 June and 7, 9 July 2009

RIM SEAL SYSTEMS E-BOOK

MINIMAX FIRE PRODUCTS WHITE PAPER THE COST-BENEFIT ADVANTAGES OF REPLACING HALON WITH 725 PSI MX 1230 CLEAN AGENT FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS

Handling Petroleum Products & Static Ignition Hazards Introduction

Economic Impact of Building Regulations

SECTION FM-200 FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM

Twin-Agent Fire Fighting/Securing Systems Specifications

The metering orifice is sized according to the type and percentage of concentrate used and is also secured with a stainless steel retaining ring)

NEBOSH International Technical Certificate in Oil and Gas Operational Safety

The regulatory section first discusses codes and standards and then Federal and State legislative and local requirements.

FIRE SAFETY DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION AND DEMOLITION

Beneficial Use of Landfill Gas for Leachate Evaporation and Power Generation

JET-X HIGH-EXPANSION FOAM GENERATORS Data/Specifications

FANERGY Far more than just a fan.

ICC Update - Laboratory Issues Code Changes / Proposals / Trends of Interest 10/2005

Emergency shutdown systems. Procedures for bypassing ESD s

CERTIFICATION SAFETY & BEYOND

POSITION PAPER ON WATER MIST FOR FIRE FIGHTING APPLICATIONS

COUNTY OF BERGEN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY INSTITUTE POLICE, FIRE & EMS ACADEMIES 281 Campgaw Road Mahwah, N.J.

Waste Recycling. Korn Recycling GmbH. Stationary Fire Protection Case Study

Transcription:

Foam Solutions, LLC 2251 Performance Parkway, Columbus, Ohio 43207 Ph 614-586-1326; Fax 614-586-1278 Foam Proportioner Test Manual Aqua Foam Test Method U.S. Patent 7,080,694/7,513,315. Other patents pending Jan. 10, 2010

CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 Foam Fire Protection... 1 1.2 Requirements for Foam System Testing... 1 1.3 Foam System Inspection and Testing... 2 2.0 AQUA FOAM TEST METHOD... 3 2.1 General Description of the Method... 3 2.2 Attributes of the Method... 4 2.3 A Complete Foam System Inspection and Testing Program... 4 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE HARDWARE AND FORMS FOR AQUA FOAM TESTING... ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. 3.1 Components for an Aqua Foam Test...Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.2 Test Form...Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.3 Care and Maintenance of the Equipment...Error! Bookmark not defined. 4.0 INSTRUCTIONS FOR CONDUCTING AN AQUA FOAM TEST...ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. 4.1 Bladder Tank Systems... 9 4.2 ILBP System...Error! Bookmark not defined. 5.0 EXAMPLE OF AQUA FOAM TESTING... ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. 6.0 EQUIPMENT REQUIRED.. 19 6.1 Bladder Tank Systems... 19 6.2 ILBP Systems 19

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Foam Fire Protection FOAM PROPORTIONER TEST MANUAL AQUA FOAM TEST METHOD Foam fire protection systems are installed in many high hazard/high value locations. These systems are intended to suppress or extinguish very challenging Class B (flammable liquid) fires. Flammable liquid fires can grow extremely rapidly with tremendous heat output and must be rapidly controlled before building systems, contents and structures are destroyed. Foam fire protection systems discharge a foam solution (a mixture of foam concentrate at 1-6 percent concentration in water). The foam solution also is mixed with air at the discharge device or picks up air as the foam solution stream is applied. This water/concentrate/air mixture generates a mass of stable bubbles that form a foam blanket on the surface of a flammable liquid. The foam blanket extinguishes the fire primarily by sealing off and halting the vaporizing flammable liquid. The foam blanket also cools the fuel and fire exposed structure or contents. The foam blanket must be applied to and/or be able to flow over the entire flammable liquid surface to extinguish it. Flammable liquid firefighting relies on the foam blanket, which can only be generated when the proper ratio of foam concentrate is added to the water stream. It is imperative for the proper operation of a foam system, and the ability to provide flammable liquid fire protection, that the foam proportioning system is functioning properly. 1.2 Requirements for Foam System Testing The annual foam test is a crucial part of plant maintenance, these systems in most cases protect the most hazardous and flammable part of the facility. There are many cases where the systems are not flushed after the original acceptance testing. These systems tend to have blockages and corrosion in concentrate supply and proportioning equipment. NFPA 11 requires annual inspection and testing. The goal of this inspection and testing is to ensure that the system is in full operating condition and that it remains in that condition until the next inspection (section 11.1.4). NFPA 409 (section 11.1.1) requires an operational test with actual foam discharge on the foam proportioning device every 5 years. NFPA 16 also requires annual testing. In addition, most states have made testing part of their revised codes. 1

1.3 Foam System Inspection and Testing A. Background of foam system test difficulties: 1. The cost of concentrate is in the range of $20 to $40 per gallon. 2. A test on a 1000 Gallon Bladder Tank could use from 50 to 200 Gallons of foam concentrate for a foam only cost of $1500 to $6,000 3. The disposal of the foam consists of three parts. Capturing the foam Transportation / Clean up Disposal 4. Capturing the foam / Trucks, Tankers, Drivers ($800 per day) 5. Disposal of foam / Waste water treatment Plant/ Incineration/ Recycling (.20 to 2.00 per gallon) 6. Clean up and spillage / Vacuum tanks and Trucks, Labor ($500 - $5000) 7. The ongoing testing has several obstacles The Facility management and the A.H.J having proper knowledge and training of the system. Coordinating a test that can involve: Plant, Environmental department, Safety, Maintenance, Production. Outside, AHJ, Underwriter, Fire Protection Contractor, Foam Manufacturer, Transport Company, Offsite disposal facility. The overall cost. 2

2.0 AQUA FOAM TEST METHOD 2.1 General Description of the Method In this document, the word system is used to refer to the actual installed foam system. An Aqua Foam test is a single run of the system with water used in place of foam concentrate. The word method is used to refer to the overall process of testing a foam system; including the initial foam system discharge test, the first Aqua Foam test, the Aqua Foam test apparatus and the follow on Aqua Foam tests. The method relies on an initial foam system discharge test to establish that the system is working properly and to determine the concentration the proportioner is developing. This test is conducted in the same fashion as any other foam proportioning system acceptance test. This test is immediately followed by an Aqua Foam test (AFT) at the exact same conditions as the initial foam discharge test. This is a patented method, U.S. Patent 7,080,694/7,513,315 and other patents pending. An Aqua Foam test essentially replaces the foam concentrate supply to the proportioner with water, see Figure 1 and Figure 2. The flow rate of the system and the flow rate of the water used in place of the concentrate are both measured with precision flow meters, and an AFT proportioning rate is established. The proportioning system can then be tested in the future by repeating an AFT and comparing the results to the initial AFT. Flow of foam concentrate is not necessary. As long as the water proportioning rate from the original AFT and the new AFT are within +/- 5 percent, or a limit established by the Authority Having Jurisdiction, the system is considered to be proportioning within the bounds of the original foam concentrate acceptance test. For a complete test of the operation of the foam system, the following would also typically be performed; a concentrate test (sample sent to the manufacturer or other test lab), a concentrate delivery test (the foam pump would be run and tested for pressure and flowrate at the proportioner the concentrate being returned to the tank), and a valve operation test (ensure all valves are operating properly), etc 3

2.2 Attributes of the Method After the initial foam system acceptance test, this method of foam proportioning system testing has several positive attributes over continuing tests with foam concentrate. These include: A. Cost savings of the foam concentrate. B. Water only testing which has no environmental or clean up concerns. C. Ability to allow the system to operate for longer period of time while only flowing water. D. Ability to vary the system operating parameters over a wide range of flow rates. E. Simple set-up of equipment and ease of conducting the tests. F. Meeting manufactures requirements for flushing the system with water. Currently, discharge testing of foam systems (outside of system acceptance testing) is rarely performed because of the cost, clean up, and complications. The advantages of this method could lead to a significant increase in the frequency of system testing and also to more thorough and complete testing. An increase in system reliability would be expected. For a new foam system installation (or possibly even for some existing systems), the required piping and/or instrumentation for Aqua Foam testing could be permanently included as part of the system. This would result in very efficient and inexpensive testing of the system, along the lines of a sprinkler system flow test. A cost comparison is shown in Table 1. 2.3 A Complete Foam System Inspection and Testing Program A. Describe as part of a complete test program for a foam system. 1. The foam concentrate sample must be sent to certified lab for testing 2. The foam pump flow rate and pressure which must meet manufactures specifications 3. All controllers and activation equipment must be tested 4. The system total water flow must be tested and verified 5. The level of the foam concentrate tank must be verified 6. All foam makers and nozzles must be inspected 7. The foam proportioning system must be tested 4

5

6