Early Suppression Fast Response Sprinklers and Obstructions

Similar documents
Obstructions and ESFR Sprinklers Phase 2 FINAL REPORT

Storage Protection Using Horizontal Barriers and Large K-Factor, Extended Coverage In-Rack Sprinklers

Protection of Rack Stored Exposed Expanded Group A Plastics with ESFR Sprinklers and Vertical Barriers

Obstructions and ESFR Sprinklers Phase 1

Today's Topics & Sustainability Themes

Warehouse Protection of Exposed Expanded Group-A Plastics with Electronic Sprinkler Technology

Requirements for the protection of High-Piled Combustible Storage (HPCS) Effective Date: January 2011

Tire Storage. Michigan Fire Inspectors Society Fall Conference

Protection of Rack Stored Exposed Expanded Group A Plastics with ESFR Sprinklers and Vertical Barriers

Significant Advancements in Water Based Fire Suppression for Storage Occupancies

High challenge warehouse case study Summary

SFPE Austin/San Antonio Chapter Meeting

Storage Sprinkler U.S. Quick Reference Guide

Plan Submittal Checklist

The Effect of Large Orifice Sprinklers on High-Challenge Fires

Model ESFR K-factor Pendent Sprinkler Early Suppression, Fast Response General Description. Sprinkler Identification Number (SIN)

Redlands Fire Department Fire Protection Standard

Box-in-Box Cold Storage Fire Protection Options

TECHNICAL DATA. Refer to the Approval Chart and Design Criteria for UL and FM Listing/Approval requirements that must be followed.

The Loss prevention Council. Phase 1 report

Large-scale fire sprinkler tests with the AutoStore compact storage system

TECHNICAL DATA. * Refer the Approval Charts and Design Criteria on pages 3-5 for culus Listing and FM Approval requirements that must be followed.

NFPA Edition. NFPA 13 (2016 Edition) Hot Topics and NFPA 13 FAQ s. Highlights of 2016 Changes. Storage Commodity Classification 4/29/2014

esfr pendent sprinkler vk510 (k25.2)

Sprinkler Solutions for Storage Applications

Antifreeze Solutions and Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems. March 12, 2013

Model ESFR-17 Dry Type Pendent Sprinklers Early Suppression Fast Response 16.8 K-factor General Description

Model ESFR K-factor Dry Type Pendent Sprinklers Early Suppression, Fast Response General Description

Model ESFR K-factor Dry Type Pendent Sprinklers Early Suppression, Fast Response General Description

ESFR PENDENT SPRINKLER VK510 (K25.2) TECHNICAL DATA

Model ESFR-17 Dry Type Pendent Sprinklers Early Suppression Fast Response 16.8 K-factor General Description

High-Piled Combustible Storage

esfr dry pendent sprinkler Vk502 (k14.0)

esfr pendent sprinkler vk510 (k25.2)

TECHNICAL DATA OBSOLETE. * Refer the Approval Chart on page 121c and Design Criteria on page 121d for FM approval requirements that must be followed.

esfr dry pendent sprinkler Vk501 (k14.0)

NOT YOUR AVERAGE K-FACTOR: A NOVEL SPRINKLER COMPARISON TOOL

TECHNICAL DATA. * Refer the Approval Chart on page 120c and Design Criteria on page 120d for culus and FM approval requirements that must be followed.

Developing a Fire Test Strategy for Storage Protection Under Sloped Ceilings

SCHULTE & ASSOCIATES Building Code Consultants 880D Forest Avenue Evanston, IL /

SANTA ROSA FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU INSPECTION CHECKLIST HIGH PILED STORAGE

ATTIC UPRIGHT SPECIFIC APPLICATION SPRINKLER VK696 TECHNICAL DATA

RESEARCH TECHNICAL REPORT. SMART Sprinkler Protection for Highly Challenging Fires - Phase 2: Full-Scale Fire Tests in Rack Storage

culus Listed: Category VNIV Refer to the Approval Chart on page 3. VK697 Attic Upright Sprinkler Specifications:

HVLS Fans and Sprinkler Operation Phase 1 Research Program

Model ESFR-17 Early Suppression, Fast Response Upright Sprinklers 16.8 K-factor General Description

Protection of Storage Under Sloped Ceilings Phase 2 Full Scale Test Matrix

ESFR PENDENT SPRINKLER VK500 (K14.0) TECHNICAL DATA

Impact of a High Volume Low Speed Fan on Sprinkler Performance in Rack Storage Fires

Fire Prevention Coffee Break Training. May 2017

COSTCO, SAN FRANCISCO A PRESCRIPTIVE AND PERFORMANCE BASED ANALYSIS OF FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND DESIGN

MODEL V-BB SPECIFIC APPLICATION TECHNICAL DATA

SCHULTE & ASSOCIATES Building Code Consultants 880D Forest Avenue Evanston, IL /

The Situation. Modeling Storage Occupancies Under Sloped Ceilings. Concerns (Elevation View) The Concerns 4/29/ NFPA Conference & Expo

FEMA Recommendations for Protection of Curtained Limited Finishing Workstations using UL 1254 Listed Pre engineered Dry Chemical Systems

Certificate of Compliance

SUMMARY. Building receiving sprinkler credit: SPRINKLERED. Grade: 68. Percent of Building Sprinklered: 100% Sprinkler Demand Met: 91%

Model JL-14 (SIN RA1812) K14.0 (200 metric) Early Suppression Fast Response Sprinkler

SPRINKLER TECHNOLOGY:

FEMA RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROTECTION OF CURTAINED LIMITED FINISHING WORKSTATIONS USING UL 1254 LISTED PRE-ENGINEERED DRY CHEMICAL SYSTEMS

TECHNICAL DATA NOTICE

Moving Target: A Case Study in Providing Fire Protection Below a Reconfigurable Concert Hall Seating System. Part 1: Concept Design

Model ESFR-25 Early Suppression, Fast Response Pendent Sprinklers 25.2 K-factor General Description

TECHNICAL DATA OBSOLETE

The Science Behind Water Mist Protection of Typical Building Hazards

FIRE PROTECTION FOR NON-STORAGE OCCUPANCIES WITH HIGH CEILING CLEARANCES

IMO. 4 June 1999 GUIDELINES FOR THE APPROVAL OF ALTERNATIVE FIXED WATER-BASED FIRE-FIGHTING SYSTEMS FOR SPECIAL CATEGORY SPACES

The Worldwide Use of Fire Sprinklers

RESIDENTIAL SPRINKLER INSTALLATION GUIDE

First Revision No. 632-NFPA [ Global Input ] Supplemental Information. Submitter Information Verification. Committee Statement

National Fire Protection Association. 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA Phone: Fax:

Sprinkler System Installer Level 2

American Fire Sprinkler Association. An Introduction to the IBC and IFC

Koffel Associates, Inc.

STORAGE FIRE PROTECTION SPRINKLERS

Model MBEC-14. Extended Coverage Ordinary & Extra Hazard Horizontal Sidewall Sprinklers for Metal Building Applications. Model MBEC-14 (SIN R6932)

Sprinkler Identification Numbers

2016/2017 Fee Schedule

9/15/ Cantara Lane Vista, CA (760)

By: Russell Bainbridge March 18th, 2016 FPE 596

Table EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE a OCCUPANCY SYSTEM SYSTEM. A, E, F-1, I-1, M, b,d R, S-1. B c. F-2, S-2, U c

Using FDS Modelling to Establish Performance Criteria for Water Mist Systems on Very Large Fires in Tunnels

1.0 INTRODUCTION. Shaw Industries Group 2 SwRI Project No c

J. R. Qualey III, L. Desmarais, J. Pratt Simplex Time Recorder Co., 100 Simplex Drive, Westminster, MA 01441

MOBILE FIRE - RESCUE DEPARTMENT FIRE CODE ADMINISTRATION

Factors Affecting Efficiency of Water Mist Suppression of Solid Combustible Fires in Open Environment

CLT Adhesive Tests in Support of Mass Timber Buildings

Firefighter Safety in Battery Energy Storage System Fires

Fire Safety Evaluation of Existing Manufactured Educational Building Covered by Section 423 of the Florida Building Code

Protection of Combustible Liquids Stored In Composite Intermediate Bulk Containers (IBCs) Research Project. Phase II Final Report.

Models BB, SD, HIP, and AP Specific Application Sprinklers For Protecting Attics General Description

freedom residential flush pendent sprinkler vk476 (K4.9)

Zurn Pex, Inc. Residential Fire Protection Presentation. PEX Plumbing, Radiant Heating and Residential Fire Protection Systems

SECTION WET PIPE FIRE PROTECTION SPRINKLER SYSTEM

Statue of Liberty: A Risk Analysis

B. Section Identification for Fire Suppression Piping and Equipment.

SECTION (13900) - FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS

SANTA ROSA FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST FIRE ALARM SYSTEM INSTALLATION

Osceola County Department of Fire Rescue and Emergency Medical Services

EMERGENCY VENTILATION FOR SMOKE CONTROL IN ROADWAY TUNNELS (NCHRP PROJECT TASK 363)

Transcription:

Early Suppression Fast Response Sprinklers and Obstructions Presented at SUPDET 2016 March 1, 2016 San Antonio, Texas Presented by: Garner Palenske, P.E. Senior Vice President Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation

Outline Introduction ESFR Sprinkler Design Concept Actual Delivered Density Testing Full-scale Testing Questions 1

Introduction Project Goal: Develop a tool which can be used to provide a reliable analysis of the impact of obstructions on ESFR sprinkler performance. Existing data New fire testing/analysis Phase I of the project included: Literature review GAP analysis Test plan development Phase II of the project included: Actual Delivered Density testing Full-scale fire testing The results of the project will be provided to the NFPA 13 Technical Committee to develop requirements for inclusion in the standard. 2

Actual Delivered Density (ADD) Testing Goal: Determine the ESFR K17 sprinkler to be used in the full scale testing. ADD Testing of three different manufacturer s ESFR sprinklers: Tyco Reliable Viking Apparatus UL Third Generation ADD Apparatus Fire Size 2.5 MW fire to simulate the heat release rate of the 30 Ft. Group A plastic commodity in full scale test 3

Actual Delivered Density (ADD) Apparatus 4

Bar Joist Obstruction ADD Testing 5

Bar Joist Obstruction ADD Testing 6

Bar Joist Obstruction ADD Testing 7

Bar Joist and Bridging Member Diagram 8

Actual Delivered Density (ADD) Testing ESFR Sprinkler Comparison Testing - Each of the 3 sprinklers (Tyco, Viking, Reliable) were tested as follows (12 ADD tests total): Test Number Obstruction Horizontal Offset (Tip of Joist to Sprinkler Centerline) Fire Location Clearance from Ceiling to Top of Apparatus 1 Baseline None None 2 22 In. deep bar joist 3 In. 3 30 In. deep bar joist 3 In. Under one sprinkler Under one sprinkler Under one sprinkler 10 Ft. 10 Ft. 10 Ft. 4 22 In. deep bar joist with 1½ In. x 1½ In. bridging member positioned on joist centered under sprinkler 3 In. Under one sprinkler 10 Ft. 9

Actual Delivered Density (ADD) Testing Sprinkler A was selected. Selection Criteria: Lowest ADD with obstruction Largest percent difference (Obstructed vs. Non-Obstructed) Most number of collection pans with 0 discharge 10

ESFR Full Scale Testing Overview Test Array Standard Group A commodity 30 ft. storage, 40 ft. ceiling Double row racks, 6 in longitudinal and transverse flue space ESFR K17 sprinklers, 52 psi 4 ft. aisles 4 bay target arrays Sprinkler spacing 10 ft. x 10 ft. The ignition point will be under one sprinkler offset in the transverse flue space. 11

Full Scale Testing Logic- Sample TEST 1 Joist Depth: 22" OFFSET: 3" PASS Joist Depth: 30" OFFSET: 3" FAIL Joist Depth: 22" OFFSET: 6" PASS Joist Depth: 36" OFFSET: 3" FAIL Joist Depth: 30" OFFSET: 6" PASS Joist Depth: 30" OFFSET: 3" FAIL Joist Depth: 22" OFFSET: 9" PASS STOP PASS STOP FAIL Joist Depth: 36" OFFSET: 6" FAIL Joist Depth: 36" OFFSET: 9" STOP PASS Continue with Joist Depth: 36" OFFSET: 3" Path FAIL Joist Depth: 30" OFFSET: 9" PASS/FAIL Continue with Joist Depth: 36" OFFSET: 3" Path PASS STOP PASS Joist Depth: 36" OFFSET: 3" FAIL Joist Depth: 36" OFFSET: 6" FAIL Joist Depth:30" OFFSET: 9" FAIL Joist Depth: 30" OFFSET: 6" PASS Joist Depth: 36" OFFSET: 3" PASS/FAIL Continue with Joist Depth: 30" OFFSET: 3" Path PASS STOP FAIL Joist Depth: 36" OFFSET: 9" STOP PASS/FAIL Contiue with Joist Depth: 36" OFFSET 3" Path PASS STOP FAIL Joist Depth: 36" OFFSET: 9" STOP FAIL Joist Depth: 36" OFFSET: 6" PASS STOP 12

Actual Delivered Density (ADD) Testing Results 0-inch Offset Center 4 Pans Center 16 Pans Bar Joist Depth No OBST OBST % Diff No OBST OBST % Diff 22-inch 1.24 0.14-89% 0.84 0.17-80% 30-inch 1.24 0.28-77% 0.84 0.35-58% 36-inch 1.24 0.25-80% 0.84 0.39-54% 3-inch Offset Center 4 Pans Center 16 Pans Bar Joist Depth No OBST OBST % Diff No OBST OBST % Diff 22-inch 1.24 0.93-25% 0.84 0.56-33% 30-inch 1.24 0.71-43% 0.84 0.51-39% 36-inch 1.24 0.73-41% 0.84 0.55-34% 6-inch Offset Center 4 Pans Center 16 Pans Bar Joist Depth No OBST OBST % Diff No OBST OBST % Diff 22-inch 1.24 1.37 11% 0.84 0.71-15% 30-inch 1.24 1.42 15% 0.84 0.72-14% 36-inch 1.24 0.98-21% 0.84 0.62-26% 13

Plan View of Test Arrangement 4 Bay Targets with Single Line Obstruction 14

BIM 15

Pass/Fail Criteria for Full Scale ESFR Tests The following pass/fail criteria were established: A maximum of eight sprinklers activate The fire is generally contained to the ignition array Ceiling gas temperatures are such that exposed structural steel would not be endangered (peak one minute average temperatures less than 1,000 F) 16

ESFR Full Scale Testing Overview Test Number 1 2 3 4 5 Primary Obstruction 36 inch deep steel joist, tip of lower chord 6 inches from centerline of sprinkler 30 inch deep steel joist, tip of lower chord 3 inches from centerline of sprinkler 36 inch deep steel joist, tip of lower chord 6 inches from centerline of sprinkler 36 inch deep steel joist, tip of lower chord 6 inches from centerline of sprinkler 22 inch deep steel joist, tip of lower chord 6 inches from centerline of sprinkler Secondary Obstruction None None 1-1/2 in. by 1-1/2 in. bridging member; 1-1/2 in. away from sprinkler 1-1/2 in. by 1-1/2 in. bridging member; Centered below sprinkler 1-1/2 in. by 1-1/2 in. bridging member; Centered below sprinkler 17

ESFR Full Scale Testing Overview Test 1-36-inch Bar Joist, 6 Inch Horizontal Offset 18

ESFR Full Scale Testing Overview Test 1-36-inch Bar Joist, 6 Inch Horizontal Offset Length of Test, minutes 31 First Sprinkler Operation Time, min:sec 0:56 Last Sprinkler Operation Time, min:sec 6:08 Number of Operated Sprinklers 3 Peak Gas Temperature at Ceiling Above Ignition, F 294 Maximum 1 minute Average Gas Temperature at Ceiling Above Ignition, F Peak Steel Temperature at Ceiling Above Ignition, F Maximum 1 minute Average Steel Temperature at Ceiling Above Ignition, F Ignition Time of Target Array, min:sec 129 128 126 3:36 (North Target) Fire Travel to Extremities of Test Array No 19

Test 1 Sprinkler Activation 20

Test 1: 36-inch Deep Bar Joist with 6-inch Offset ADD Data Overlay 21

Show video test 1 22

Test 1 Main Array North Side 23

ESFR Full Scale Testing Overview Test 2 30-inch Bar Joist, 3 Inch Horizontal Offset 24

ESFR Full Scale Testing Overview Test 2-30-inch Bar Joist, 3 Inch Horizontal Offset. Length of Test, minutes 32 First Sprinkler Operation Time, min:sec 1:42 Last Sprinkler Operation Time, min:sec 7:37 Number of Operated Sprinklers 12 Peak Gas Temperature at Ceiling Above Ignition, F Maximum 1 minute Average Gas Temperature at Ceiling Above Ignition, F Peak Steel Temperature at Ceiling Above Ignition, F Maximum 1 minute Average Steel Temperature at Ceiling Above Ignition, F Ignition Time of Target Array, min:sec Fire Travel to Extremities of Test Array 256 * 157 * 157 * 3:24 (North Target) No 25

Test 2: 30-inch Deep Bar Joist with 3-inch Offset ADD Data Overlay 26

dno dno dno dno dno dno dno dno Test 2 Sprinkler Activation dno dno dno 4:04 4:08 7:34 dno dno dno dno dno dno 7:37 4:14 dno dno dno dno 4:14 1:42 4:35 4:07 dno dno dno dno dno dno 3:56 4:11 dno dno dno dno dno dno 4:03 dno dno dno 27

Show video Test 2 and Gopro 28

Test 2 Main Array North Side 29

Test 1\2 Damage Comparison Test 1 Main Array North Side Test 2 Main Array North Side 30

ESFR Full Scale Testing Overview Test 4-36-inch Bar Joist, 6 Inch Horizontal Offset, Bridging Member Centered Below Sprinkler 31

ESFR Full Scale Testing Overview Test 4-36-inch Bar Joist, 6 Inch Horizontal Offset, Bridging Member Centered Below Sprinkler. Length of Test, minutes 32 First Sprinkler Operation Time, min:sec 1:11 Last Sprinkler Operation Time, min:sec 1:11 Number of Operated Sprinklers 1 Peak Gas Temperature at Ceiling Above Ignition, F 250 Maximum 1 minute Average Gas Temperature at Ceiling Above Ignition, F Peak Steel Temperature at Ceiling Above Ignition, F Maximum 1 minute Average Steel Temperature at Ceiling Above Ignition, F Ignition Time of Target Array, min:sec Fire Travel to Extremities of Test Array 115 84 83 N/A No 32

Test 4 Sprinkler Activation 33

Show video Test 4 and Gopro 34

Show video Side By Side Test 2 and 3 Gopro 35

Test 4 Main Array North Side 36

Test 1,2, 4 Damage Comparison Test 1 Main Array North Side Test 2 Main Array North Side Test 4 Main Array North Side 37

ESFR Full Scale Testing Overview Test 5-22-inch Bar Joist, 6 Inch Horizontal Offset, Bridging Member Centered Below Sprinkler 38

ESFR Full Scale Testing Overview Test 5-22-inch Bar Joist, 6 Inch Horizontal Offset, Bridging Member Centered Below Sprinkler. Length of Test, minutes 32 First Sprinkler Operation Time, min:sec 1:01 Last Sprinkler Operation Time, min:sec 6:42 Number of Operated Sprinklers 23 Peak Gas Temperature at Ceiling Above Ignition, F 1264 Maximum 1 minute Average Gas Temperature at Ceiling Above Ignition, F Peak Steel Temperature at Ceiling Above Ignition, F Maximum 1 minute Average Steel Temperature at Ceiling Above Ignition, F Ignition Time of Target Array, min:sec Fire Travel to Extremities of Test Array 979 248 246 2:26 (North Target) Yes (North Target) 39

Test 5 Sprinkler Activation 40

Show video Test 5 and Gopro 41

Test 5- North Array 42

Test 5 North Target 43

Test Number 1 2 3 4 5 Primary Obstruction 36 inch deep steel joist, tip of lower chord 6 inches from centerline of sprinkler 30 inch deep steel joist, tip of lower chord 3 inches from centerline of sprinkler 36 inch deep steel joist, tip of lower chord 6 inches from centerline of sprinkler 36 inch deep steel joist, tip of lower chord 6 inches from centerline of sprinkler 22 inch deep steel joist, tip of lower chord 6 inches from centerline of sprinkler Secondary Obstruction Length of Test, minutes First Sprinkler Operation Time, (min:sec) Number of Operated Sprinklers Peak Gas Temp. at Ceiling Above Ignition ( F) Fire Travel to Extremities of Test Array None None 1-1/2 in. by 1-1/2 in. BM; 1-1/2 in. away from sprinkler 1-1/2 in. by 1-1/2 in. BM; Centered below sprinkler 1-1/2 in. by 1-1/2 in. BM; Centered below sprinkler 31 32 32 32 32 0:56 1:46 1:19 1:11 1:01 3 12 1 1 23 294 406* 238 250 1264 No No No No Yes (North Target) North Target Array Ignition Time 3:36 3:24 N/A N/A 2:26 44

Temperture ( c) Test Fire Growth Rate Comparison: Temperature Profiles Temperature Profiles 140 120 100 80 60 40 Test 1 Test 3 Test 4 Test 5 Test 2 20 0 0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 Time (sec) 45

Show video Test 1/2 Side by Side 46

Vertical Growth Tier Number Sprinkler Operation Ceiling 8 7 6 Time from top of 3rd Tier of Storage to Sprinkler Operation, seconds: 14 10 12 10 14 Test 1 - April 14, 2015 Test 2 - April 16, 2015 Test 3 - April 20, 2015 Test 4 - April 22, 2015 Test 5 - April 24, 2015 5 4 3 2 1 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Time, Seconds 47

BIM Sprinkler Model 48

Conclusion K-17 ESFR sprinkler obstructed by a bar joist with 6-inch offset produced acceptable results. K-17 ESFR sprinkler obstructed by a bar joist with 3-inch offset controlled the fire with 12 sprinklers operating. Regardless of horizontal offset, a bridging member with vertical separation of 19.5 inches produced acceptable results. A bridging member directly underneath the sprinkler with a vertical separation of 6 inches produced unacceptable results. Data is still needed for various other obstruction situations such as miscellaneous piping, light fixtures or duct work. 49

Questions and Answers Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 50