ii

Similar documents
Summary of Other State Archeological Guidelines

2.1.8 Cultural Resources Regulatory Setting. Affected Environment, Environmental

TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND CONSERVATION PLANS GUIDE

Appendix E Memorandum of Agreement between FHWA and the SHPO

PennDOT. single spann lanes and 3- mayy need to be to accommodate. any bridge. addition to III. Date: CRP 07/27/2015 CRP.

Section 106 Consulting Party Meeting Summary Report March 29, 2018

AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR THE RICHARDS, TEXAS FARM-TO-MARKET ROAD 149 FIBER OPTIC CABLE PROJECT IN MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS

P-3819 MOA Page 1 of 22

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 15, 2016

VILLAGE OF BOLTON HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

Required Materials For complete material(s) information, refer to

National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 Compliance

Heritage Capital Projects Fund: PRESERVATION STANDARDS HCPF Biennium Application Workshops Olympia Spokane Mount Vernon Yakima

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Preparation of National Register of Historic Places. Nominations for the following:

San Francisco General Plan Preservation Element: Objectives 7-9. Historic Preservation Commission August 20, 2014

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

TABLE OF CONTENTS. iii iv vi. vii. xii xiii xvii xix

Phase One Archaeological Investigation Results, James Madison Park Master Development Plan Project, City of Madison, Dane County, Wisconsin

Table of Contents for the REGULATION (EU) 2017/745 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 5 April 2017

Corridor Management Committee. September 29, 2017

ER# /22/03

DRAFT NFPA 805 TRANSITION PILOT PLANT OBSERVATION GUIDANCE

HuNAHS s Cemeteries and Graves Program Plan

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

Historic and Archaeological Resources

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

CULTURAL LANDSCAPES: IDENTIFICATION, EVALUATION, IN 106 PROCESS

HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES POLICIES

OHIO UNIVERSITY RADIATION SAFETY REVIEW

Western Pennsylvania Conservancy Clairton & Harrison Community Greening Assessment Projects Request for Proposals July 2018

January 29, 2015 Page 1 of Annual Status Report St. Elizabeths Programmatic Agreement. PA Ref. Line Begin End. Description Timeframe Category

This chapter describes the purpose of the Plan, introduces how the Plan is organized and provides contextual background for the Plan.

Steering Committee Meeting

ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED PROJECTS: SECTION 106 AND SECTION 4(F)

2017/11/02. Assessment and Resolution of Adverse Effects. Objectives 32 CFR 800

STATE OF NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL AFFAIRS HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION

Red Deer County Heritage Management Plan

Introduction. Preservation Planning

Purpose of Report...1. Planning Framework Provincial Policy Statement Draft PPS...2. Ontario Heritage Act...3

Policies and Procedures for the Missouri Master Gardener Program

SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT MIRAMAR COLLEGE ASSOCIATE DEGREE COURSE OUTLINE

Mary Bradford, Director of Parks Mike Riley, Deputy Director of Parks John E. Hench, Ph.D., Chief, Park Planning & Stewardship Division

APPENDIX I PUBLIC MEETING AT PROJECT INCEPTION

CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES POLICIES

Chapter 19: Cultural Resources

City of San Ramon. Zoning Ordinance. Adopted: October 27, Latest Revisions Effective: March 28, 2018

2013 Annual Status Report St. Elizabeths Programmatic Agreement. January 29, 2014 Page 1 of 8. PA Ref. Line Begin End. Description Timeframe Category

Whitemarsh Township Greenway Plan

Transportation Improvements

OVERMOUNTAIN VICTORY TRAIL BURKE CALDELL CORRIDOR FEASIBLITY STUDY REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS CALDWELL COUNTY PATHWAYS

Decision Notice. Proposed Action

~!VAUGHAN NOV Z November 21, Mr. Denis Kelly, Regional Clerk The Regional Municipality of York Yonge Street Newmarket, ON L3Y 6Z1

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK BYLAW NO A bylaw to adopt Amendment No. 6 to the Official Plan for The Regional Municipality of York

Bureau for Historic Preservation s Guidance for Historic Preservation Planning

MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES BUILDING

Fire Protection Systems FST 209. COURSE SYLLABUS Fire Protection Systems FST 209 [Semester] CRN 3 Credits

APPENDIX J SHPO COORDINATION

2018 WORK PLAN. Land Use & Ethics Training presented by: Assistant City Attorney, Natasha Zimmerman

RADIATION CONTROL GUIDE

CPA , Bristoe Station and Kettle Run Preservation Study Comprehensive Plan Amendment

SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

PUBLIC HEARING May 18, 2010 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION

Cumberland Comprehensive Plan Town Council adopted August 2003, State adopted June 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Project Memo. IDNR State Revolving Fund

SUMMARY. Support the Southeast Arkansas Regional Intermodal Facility.

ATTACHMENT A. Town of Lebanon Village Center Study Proposal Cover Sheet (to be included with Proposal) Contract shall not exceed $48,500.

Request for Proposals (RFP) Consultant Services for the Muckleshoot Placemaking and Landscape Visual Design Services; Campus/Village Planning Project

Local Authority Involvement in the Historic Environment

CEQA and Historic Preservation: A 360 Degree Review

THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) AND HISTORICAL AND TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES

SECTION 4(f) DE MINIMIS DOCUMENTATION

PURPOSE: The purpose is to provide commercial facilities in the Vancouver and Clark County vicinity.

Environmental Resources Branch

RE: 2018 CENTRAL STATES ASLA AWARDS PROGRAM CALL FOR ENTRIES

Institutional Master Plan The Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University

RESOLUTION NO

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL RFP PRESERVATION MASTER PLAN FOR THE ELAM MARTIN FARMSTEAD CITY OF WATERLOO RIM PARK TERMS OF REFERENCE

CAC OVERVIEW. CAC Roles and Responsibilities CAC Operations CAC Membership CAC DAC Relations

CECW-AG 11 June 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR MAJOR SUBORDINATE COMMANDS AND DISTRICT COMMANDS

April 4, 2013 Rana Ahmadi San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency 1 South Van Ness Avenue, 7th Floor San Francisco, CA 94103

Goal 1 To establish and follow land use patterns for the long-range development of the campus.

LANCASTER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING AGENDA. Monday, August 27, 2018

Development Reviews. An overview of the Commission s review process, primarily in Klickitat County. March 13, 2018

SECTION 7A: WHAKARONGO RESIDENTIAL AREA

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Zoning Ordinance Article 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE PAGE DECLARATION DEDICATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT ABSTRAK

DRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4

TABLE OF CONTENTS HISTORIC PRESERVATION ELEMENT I. INTRODUCTION HP. A. Purpose HP B. Assessment and Conclusions...

Beautification Advisory Committee Mission Statement and Goals & Objectives

APPENDIX 2 NORTHEAST AIR ALLIANCE. SMOKE MANAGEMENT PLAN For Butte, Lassen, Modoc, Plumas, Shasta, Siskiyou, Tehama

City Council Special Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO. C.

Historic Asset Management A Decision Support Process for Balanced Consideration of Mission Utility, Historic Value, and Facility Condition

Loss Prevention Standard

RUTH STANBRIDGE. Consultant * Historic/Environmental Researcher * Grant Writer. RE: Final Environmental Impact Statement - All Aboard Florida Project.

Public Information/Cultural Resources Committee Workshop August 15, Florida Department of Transportation District One

Chapter 6 cultural heritage

Master Gardener Volunteer Expectations Guidelines

January 02, 2019 RE: 2019 CENTRAL STATES ASLA AWARDS PROGRAM CALL FOR ENTRIES

Transcription:

ii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 1975, the Iowa State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) distributed the first draft of Guidelines for Archaeological Investigations in Iowa. Over the past 24 years, several versions of this document have been conveyed. The intent of this document focused on documentation issues for reports resulting from archaeological investigations. Over the years, the State Historical Society of Iowa (SHSI), Office of the State Archaeologist (OSA), and the Association of Iowa Archaeologists (AIA) have recognized the need for guidelines defining the different types of archaeological investigations and appropriate field methods for conducting field investigations. The Iowa SHPO has held federal agency training sessions, public comment periods, a public seminar, and committee meetings to receive input, discuss, and update progress with the Guidelines for Archaeological Investigations in Iowa. Since 1998, there has been a concerted effort on the part of the Iowa SHPO to distribute the Guidelines for Archaeological Investigations in Iowa in a more global and comprehensive format. The following is a summary of public and agency participation within the last year and a half. In April 1998, the 1998 Draft of the Guidelines for Archaeological Investigations in Iowa was sent for comment to 312 individuals, agencies, and organizations. Nineteen people responded with comments for this draft. There were two round table meetings of the previous authors (May 28 & July 7, 1998) held to review, discuss, and incorporate comments from the first 1998 Draft of the Guidelines for Archaeological Investigations. Two representatives from the Iowa SHPO, one representative from AIA, and one representative from OSA attended these meetings. In August 1998, the second 1998 Draft of the Guidelines for Archaeological Investigations in Iowa was sent for comment. Fifty-two copies were sent to 21 different federal agencies, 16 sent to 8 different state agencies, 64 sent to AIA members, 38 sent to non AIA consultants, 99 sent to county engineers, 41 sent to environmental firms, 13 sent to Council of Government offices, 13 sent to 12 different Native American Tribal contacts, 5 sent to professional geomorphologists, 2 sent to 2 different State Historic Preservation Offices, 1 sent to other interested parties. A total of 344 copies were sent with 14 people having responded with comments. iii

On September 17, 1998, the Iowa SHPO hosted a Section 106 Partnering Seminar held at The State Historical Building, Des Moines, IA. The Iowa SHPO presented an overview of the Section 106 process, the Archaeological Guidelines, and Historical and architectural issues relating to Section 106. One hundred sixteen individuals representing at least 11 different federal agencies, 6 different state agencies, 13 different archaeological consulting firms, 2 different Native American Interests, and 33 other different interested parties attended the seminar. This seminar encouraged any interested person, or agency to participate in the formation of a committee to review the Guidelines for Archaeological Investigations in Iowa and the comments generated from the second 1998 draft. The committee formed to review further comments from the second 1998 Draft of Guidelines for Archaeological Investigations in Iowa met two times (November 19 & December 1, 1998). The committee consisted of 15 individuals representing 4 federal agencies, 3 state agencies, 1 professional archaeologist organization, 0 archaeological consulting firms, 2 Native American Interests, and 1 other interested party. The results of all the public and agency input are the Guidelines for Archaeological Investigations in Iowa (1999). This document details recommendations for archaeological research for various agencies, interest groups, and private landowners. The Guidelines explain the differences between regulatory and non-regulatory archaeology and how this document may be used pertaining to the needs of the project. This document also presents a brief overview of culture history in Iowa and examples of different archaeological sites. This document is a living document and will be reviewed annually to accommodate changes in federal laws, state laws, archaeological technology, and other factors that may affect the constructive use of this document. The Iowa SHPO will use this document to assist in review of archaeological projects undertaken in the state. This document is not regulatory in nature and implies no regulatory authority written or otherwise. iv

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The State Historical Society wishes to extend its gratitude and appreciation for the assistance received from the interested public, federal and state agencies, and colleagues in the preparation of these guidelines. The State Historical Society would also like to thank the many individuals, organizations, and agencies who over the years have provided constructive comments and valuable insights to the formation of these guidelines. The State Historical Society would like to specifically note the contributions of the initial 1998 guidelines author group consisting of William Green (State Archaeologist), Douglas Jones (SHPO), Kira Kaufmann (SHPO), and Leah Rogers (president of the Association of Iowa Archaeologists) as well as contributors to previous versions of the Guidelines for Archaeological Investigations in Iowa such as Art Bettis (IDNR), Kathy Gourley (SHPO), Shirley Schermer, (OSA), Kay Simpson (SHPO), and Tim Weitzel (OSA). The State Historical Society would also like to specifically note the contributions of the most recent following committee members and their sponsoring agency or affiliation: Harold Budd (Iowa Department of Transportation), Jonathan Buffalo (Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa), James Carroll (Rural Development), Ron Deiss (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers), Jeff Joens (Iowa Department of Natural Resources), Martin Konrad (Iowa Department of Natural Resources), Randall Faber (Iowa Department of Transportation), Scott Hemingway (Iowa Rural Water Association), Gerry Kennedy (Federal Highway Administration), Judy McDonald (Iowa Department of Transportation), Kerry McGrath (Iowa State Historic Preservation Office), Patricia Ohlerking (Iowa Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer), Richard Rogers (National Resource Conservation Service), and Dawn Wanatee (Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa). The State Historical Society would also like to specifically note the contributions of Jane Kaufmann, Lynda Wessel, and Mitch Overton for their efforts in proofreading, formatting, and editing this document. The State Historic Preservation Office will continue to review and revise this document when necessary to enhance the quality and usefulness of this document. In accordance with this philosophy, any additional comments on this document should be directed to the State Historic Preservation Office, State Historical Society of Iowa, 600 East Locust Street, Des Moines, IA 50319-0290. v

vi

IOWA ARCHAEOLOGICAL GUIDELINES COMMENT SHEET This form is intended for the users of these guidelines to submit comments and suggestions to the State Historical Society concerning the enclosed Guidelines for Archaeological Investigations in Iowa. Please return constructive comments to the State Historical Society Community Programs Bureau at 600 East Locust Street, Des Moines, IA 50319-0290. Name: Organization (if any): Address: City: State: Zip: Phone: e-mail: General Evaluation: 1. Were these guidelines informative? Yes No 2. Are the objectives and goals for the guidelines clear? Yes No 3. Do the goals and objectives appear to be met? Yes No 4. Are these guidelines worthwhile to you? Yes No 5. Were these guidelines helpful to you? Yes No In what way: 6. What do you like most about these guidelines? What do you like least about these guidelines? Any additional comments or suggestions to improve these guidelines (please use additional sheets as necessary): vii

viii

GUIDELINES FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN IOWA TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary.. Acknowledgements... Comment Sheet. Table of Contents.. iii v vii ix Section 1 General Applications. 1-1 Chapter 1: Introduction.. 1-3 Authority... 1-3 Scope and Purpose.... 1-3 Chapter 2: A Brief Culture History of Iowa. 1-5 Paleo-Indian.. 1-5 Archaic (General).. 1-5 Early Archaic Middle Archaic Late Archaic Woodland (General).. 1-6 Early Woodland Middle Woodland Late Woodland Late Prehistoric.. 1-8 Oneota Historic Indians and Euro-Americans 1-9 Mesquakie Historic Euro-Americans General References for Cultural Overview 1-11 Paleo-Indian Archaic Woodland Mill Creek and Great Oasis Glenwood (Central Plains) Oneota and Ioway Chapter 3: Guidelines Audience... 1-15 Regulatory Archaeology 1-15 Agencies and Regulatory Archaeology Federal Agencies State Agencies ix

TABLE OF CONTENTS continued Chapter 3: Guidelines Audience continued 1-15 Grant Programs Certified Local Government Program Historic Preservation Commissions Historic Preservation Commissions and the Use of These Guidelines Special Considerations for the CLG program HRDP Grant Program Historic Site Preservation Grant program Native American Tribes Other Ethnic Groups Non-Regulatory Archaeology... 1-19 Historic Preservation Commissions City and County HPC s Private Grant Programs Stewardship Programs Private Landowners Academic Research Native American Tribes and Other Ethnic Groups Chapter 4: Choosing a Consultant and Professional Standards 1-23 Selection of Archaeological Consultants... 1-23 Qualifications for a Project Archaeological Consultant.... 1-24 Principal Investigator Qualifications for a Project Geomorphological Consultant.. 1-25 Volunteers for Archaeological Projects.... 1-26 Certification Program for Avocational Archaeologists Section 2 Cultural Resources, Research Designs, Historic Contexts, and Modeling 2-1 Chapter 1: Types of Cultural Resources. 2-3 Archaeological Resources..... 2-3 Prehistoric Native American Archaeological Resources Historical American Archaeological Resources Inundated Archaeological Resources Nautical Archaeological Resources Rock Art Cultural Resources 2-5 Traditional Cultural Properties..... 2-5 Native American Interests and Concerns..... 2-6 Native American Tribes Historically in Iowa Other Ethnic Group Interests and Concerns.. 2-8 Cultural and Historic Landscapes..... 2-8 Cultural Landscapes Historic Landscapes Rural Historic Landscapes Farmsteads, Homesteads, and Standing Structures (Buildings & Bridges)... 2-10 Other Standing Structures Bridge Renovation or Replacement Projects x

TABLE OF CONTENTS continued Section 2 Cultural Resources, Research Designs, Historic Contexts, and Modeling 2-1 Chapter 2: Research Designs and Historical Contexts.... 2-13 Research Designs... 2-13 Purpose and Objective of Research Designs Research Designs for Phase IA or Phase I Survey Research Designs for Phase II Evaluations Research Designs for Phase III Data Recovery Steps to Write a Research Design 2-15 Objectives of Study Project Location Description Methods and Techniques Description Expected Results from Study Supporting Documentation Historic Contexts.... 2-16 The Purpose of a Historic Context Steps to Write a Historic Context Specific Criteria to Define a Historic Context Background research for a Historic Context Interpretation of Research for a Historic Context Definition of Property Types Application of a Historic Context Goals Specific to a Historic Context Chapter 3: Predictive Models and Sampling Strategies... 2-21 Definitions & Types of Predictive Models and Sampling Strategies 2-21 Purpose of Predictive Models & Sampling Strategies.. 2-22 Applications of Predictive Models & Sampling Strategies...... 2-23 Applications of Predictive Models Pertaining to Regulatory Archaeology.. 2-23 Chapter 4: New or Advanced Technology.. 2-25 Global Positioning System (GPS) 2-25 Geographic Information System (GIS). 2-25 Section 3 Archaeological Guidelines Procedures. 3-1 Chapter 1: Definitions of Levels of Archaeological Investigations 3-3 Secretary of the Interior s Standards for Identification... 3-3 Standard I Reconnaissance Surveys v.s. Intensive Surveys.. 3-3 Archaeological Reconnaissance Surveys. 3-3 Reconnaissance Surveys Should Document xi

TABLE OF CONTENTS continued Section 3 Archaeological Guidelines Procedures. 3-1 Chapter 1: Definitions of Levels of Archaeological Investigations 3-3 Intensive Archaeological Surveys and Investigations.. 3-5 Intensive Surveys Should Document Phase I Archaeological Surveys (Identification) Phase II Testing (Evaluation) Comments on Phase I Surveys (identification) and Phase II Testing (Evaluation) Treatment of Significant Archaeological Sites 3-7 Chapter 2: Archaeological Reconnaissance Surveys.... 3-11 Phase IA Archaeological Reconnaissance.. 3-11 Phase IA Archaeological Reconnaissance Applications 3-11 Chapter 3: Intensive Archaeological Surveys and Investigation.. 3-13 Procedures Prior to Implementation of Archaeological Fieldwork 3-13 Pre-Field Stage.... 3-13 Research Designs Documenting the Area of Potential Effect (APE) Documentary Research Archaeological Site Inventory Obtaining Archaeological Site Forms Important Note on Site File Checks Resources at the Office of the State Archaeologist Resources at the State Historical Society Iowa SHPO Website NADB Website State Historical Society Library Examples of Other Documentary Sources Preliminary Ethnographic Assessment Geomorphology and Archaeological Research Preliminary Geomorphological Assessment Federal Permits Required for Archaeological Research Iowa One Call State Permits Required Pertaining to Archaeological Research Contact with Landowners and Local Residents Contact with Native American Tribes or Other Ethnic Groups Geomorphological Field Work 3-20 Assessments of Impact Scope of Geomorphological Investigations Geomorphology in Valley Landscapes Geomorphological Interpretations and Recommendations Geomorphological and Archaeological Concurrent Investigations Geomorphological Investigation Methods Strategy for Geomorphology Investigations xii

TABLE OF CONTENTS continued Section 3 Archaeological Guidelines Procedures... 3-1 Chapter 3: Intensive Archaeological Surveys and Investigation. 3-13 Phase I Identification Archaeological Survey for Project Areas... 3-25 Field Methods for Survey Pedestrian Surface Survey Cutbank and Rodent Hole Examination Archaeological Subsurface Testing Documentation of Subsurface Testing Collection and Curation of Artifacts Collection of Artifacts from Private Land Identification, Definition, and Evaluation of Archaeological Sites Site Definitions Site Number Assignment Process Preliminary Evaluations of Archaeological Sites Phase II Testing (Evaluation). 3-29 The National Park Service & The S. I. Standards for Evaluation Standard I Standard II Standard III Standard IV Applying The S. I. Standards to Evaluate Archaeological Sites for Section 106 Phase II Personnel, Facilities, and Equipment.. 3-31 Phase II Pre-Field Methods.. 3-32 Research Designs for Phase II Evaluations.. 3-32 Archaeological Evaluation Field Methods 3-32 Previously Plowed Sites Previously Undisturbed Sites Deeply Buried Sites The Use of Power Equipment.. 3-34 Phase II Site Definitions and Site Number Assignment Process. 3-34 Phase II Collection of Artifacts and Curation of Specimens 3-34 Phase II Reports and Data Management.. 3-35 Determination of Site Significance... 3-35 Application of Criteria of Effect 3-36 Chapter 4: Treatment of Significant Archaeological Resources. 3-39 Treatment of Significant Archaeological Resources. 3-39 Preservation or Protection of Archaeological Sites... 3-39 Incentives for Preservation and Protection of Resources Preservation Management Planning... 3-39 Designing and Implementing a Preservation Management Plan Legal Preservation or Protection Options.. 3-40 Local Environmental Review and Local Designation or Historic Overlay Zoning Other Local Zoning and Ordinance Options xiii

TABLE OF CONTENTS continued Section 3 Archaeological Guidelines Procedures 3-1 Chapter 4: Treatment of Significant Archaeological Resources.. 3-39 Preservation or Protection Through Legal Agreement Documents 3-41 No Adverse Effect Determinations (NAE) Memoranda of Agreement (MOA) Programmatic Agreements (PA) On-Site Preservation or Protection Options.. 3-44 Conservation Easements Protected Open Space and Buffer Zones Reburial Revegetation Other On-Site Strategies to Assure Site Protection Monitoring for Protection 3-45 Fencing 3-45 Avoidance 3-45 On-Site Preservation or Protection Alternatives 3-46 Monitoring to Recover Archaeological Information Additional Archaeological Investigation Mitigation or Phase III Archaeological Data Recovery The National Park Service and S.I. Standards for Archaeological Documentation. 3-47 The S.I. Standards for Archaeological Documentation Standard I Standard II Standard III Standard IV Advisory Council on Historic Preservation: Consultation on Recovery of Significant Information From Archaeological Sites.. 3-49 Applying Secretary of Interior s Standards for Data Recovery and The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Recommendations. 3-50 Data Recovery and Relation to State Historic Preservation Plan and Other Plans. 3-50 Qualified Supervision for Data Recovery Projects. 3-50 Personnel, Facilities, and Equipment for Data Recovery Projects. 3-51 Public Benefit from Data Recovery 3-51 Public Participation for Data recovery 3-52 Cost minimization for Data Recovery. 3-52 Data Recovery Plan. 3-52 Suggested Format for Data Recovery Plan Title Page Introduction Site Description Why Data Recovery Is Appropriate Data Needs for Data Recovery & Example Methods for Data Recovery & Example Public Participation for Data Recovery & Example Budget for Data Recovery xiv

TABLE OF CONTENTS continued Section 3 Archaeological Guidelines Procedures. 3-1 Chapter 4: Treatment of Significant Archaeological Resources.. 3-39 Pre-Field Methods for Data Recovery 3-57 Field Stage for Data Recovery 3-58 Recording Architectural Characteristics Within a Data Recovery Plan Collection of Artifacts and Curation of Specimens in Data Recovery Reports and Data Management for Data Recovery 3-59 Procedures After Data Recovery: Site Management Plan and Recommendations. 3-60 Negating Adverse Effect: Documenting No Adverse Effect Chapter 5: Laboratory Work.. 3-63 Processing.. 3-63 Analysis. 3-63 Curation Standards 3-63 When Landowners Request the Return of Artifacts. 3-64 State Archaeological Repository.. 3-64 Other Repositories 3-64 Chapter 6: Report Preparation. 3-65 Information to Include in an Archaeological Report 3-65 Title Page Table of Contents Acknowledgements Abstract Introduction Environmental Context Geomorphological Context Historical/Cultural Context Research Design Methods Results Management Recommendations References Cited Figures Tables Appendix (ices) Chapter 7: Treatment of Mounds and Sites Containing Ancient Human Remains 3-73 Previously Known Burial Site.. 3-73 Newly Discovered Burial Site Encountered Prior to Construction. 3-74 Newly Discovered Burial Site Encountered During Construction.. 3-75 Historical Burial Sites.. 3-75 Obviously Recent Human Remains. 3-75 xv

TABLE OF CONTENTS continued Section 3 Archaeological Guidelines Procedures. 3-1 Chapter 8: Guidelines for Underwater Archaeological Investigations in Iowa.. 3-77 The Abandoned Shipwreck Act; Final Guidelines 3-77 Part II of the Abandoned Shipwreck Act. 3-78 Personnel, Facilities, and Equipment.. 3-78 Pre-Field Methods for Underwater Archaeological Investigations. 3-79 Field Methods for Underwater Archaeological Investigations 3-79 Site Definition, Number Assignment Process, and Evaluation 3-80 Collection of Artifacts.. 3-80 Conservation and Curation of Artifacts 3-80 Final Report Preparation.. 3-81 Chapter 9: Rock Art Sites... 3-83 Pre-Field Methods for Rock Art Sites 3-83 Field Methods and Survey for Rock Art Sites... 3-84 Landscape Survey Adjacent to Rock Art Sites.. 3-84 Documenting Rock Art Sites. 3-84 Recordation of Rock Art Specifically.... 3-85 Conservation of Rock Art Sites. 3-86 Chapter 10: Special Considerations.... 3-87 Safety and Emergency Procedures.... 3-87 Recommendations for Safety with Recovered Hazardous Waste. 3-87 Recommendations for Safety with Recovered Ammunitions... 3-87 Emergency Salvage Safety Considerations... 3-87 Monitoring During Construction.. 3-88 Unanticipated Discoveries.... 3-88 Section 4 Background Information. 4-1 Chapter 1: Laws and Regulations Protecting Cultural Resources.... 4-3 International Conventions and Treaties Protecting Cultural Resources International Charters to Protect Cultural Resources Federal Laws Protecting Cultural Resources Federal Regulations Protecting Cultural Resources Conventions Relating to Cultural Resources Executive Orders Relating to Cultural Resources National Historic Preservation Act and Section 106.. 4-6 Section 106 Definition of a Federal Undertaking Determination of the Area of Potential Effects xvi

TABLE OF CONTENTS continued Section 4 Background Information. 4-1 Chapter 1: Laws and Regulations Protecting Cultural Resources.... 4-3 Federal Agencies and the Section 106 Process.. 4-7 Agencies with Counterpart Regulations Agencies without Counterpart Regulations Steps in the Section 106 Process Step 1 in Section 106 Step 2 in Section 106 Step 3 in Section 106 Step 4 and Step 5 in Section 106 Federal Agencies and Other Legal Responsibilities State Agencies/Cities and Section 106 State Laws and Concerns.. 4-12 State Agencies and the Iowa Code Chapter 303 of the Iowa Code: 28E Agreement Between State Agencies Chapter 314.24 Of the Iowa Code: Cities, Counties, And the Iowa Department of Transportation Chapter 67 of the Iowa Code: Development and Management of Recreational Trails on State Lands Chapter 263 of the Iowa Code: The Office of the State Archaeologist Chapter 263B Iowa Code: Protecting Ancient Human Remains and Burials Section 685 of the Iowa Administrative Code: Protecting Ancient Human Remains and Burials Iowa Code (144.34): State Permits Relating to Cultural Resources OSA Indian Advisory Committee Chapter 303.20-303.34 Cities, Counties, Land Use Districts, and Historic Property Designation Sections 358A and 303 of the Iowa Code: Counties and Protection of Historic Properties (Zoning Overlay Districts) Sections 414.1-414.2 and 303 of the Iowa Code: Cities and Protection of Historic Properties (Historic District Designations and Zoning Districts) Section 303.41-303.68 of the Iowa Code: Land Use Districts County Ordinances Protecting Cultural Resources and Ancient Human Remains Chapter 2: Historic Property Registrations.. 4-19 Historic Properties and the National Register of Historic Places... 4-19 National Register Bulletins Addressing Archaeological Sites National Historic Landmarks... 4-20 Laws that Specifically Pertain to National Historic Landmarks Benefits of National Historic Landmark Status Misconceptions About National Register or National Historic Landmark Listed Sites Criteria for National Historic Landmarks National Historic Landmarks in Iowa xvii

TABLE OF CONTENTS continued Section 4 Background Information. 4-1 Chapter 3: The Consultation Process. 4-25 Federal Agencies and Consultation with the SHPO/THPO State Agencies and Consultation with the SHPO Local Communities and Historic Preservation Commissions Native American Tribes and Consultation with the SHPO and Federal Agencies Other Interested Parties and Consultation with the SHPO Procedures to Participate in Consultation with the Iowa SHPO 4-26 Chapter 4: State Historic Preservation Office Role and Review Procedures 4-27 State Historic Preservation Office in Iowa.. 4-27 SHPO Responsibility for Consultation and Review 4-27 Iowa SHPO Preliminary Assessment Forms for Project Review 4-27 Information to Include with a Determination Sent to the Iowa SHPO for Review. 4-28 Special Considerations Regarding Determinations Sent to the Iowa SHPO for Review 4-29 Iowa SHPO Review Procedures and Time Frames on Information Submitted for Non-Regulatory Projects 4-29 Iowa SHPO Review Procedures and Time Frames on Information or Reports Submitted for Regulatory Projects 4-29 Advisory Council Participation in the Review Process for Regulatory Projects 4-30 Verbal Concurrence Procedures for the Iowa SHPO. 4-30 Chapter 5: Site Interpretation and Public Outreach.. 4-33 Site Interpretation.. 4-33 Public Outreach.. 4-33 Public Outreach and the NHPA Methods of Public Outreach Public Archaeology 4-34 OSA Public Archaeology Program 4-35 Section 5 Examples and Appendices 5-1 Appendix A: Example Research Design Appendix B: Example Scope of Work Appendix C: Example Memorandum of Agreement Appendix D: Example Programmatic Agreement Appendix E: Iowa State 28E Agreement Appendix F: Example Cultural Resources Management Plan Appendix G: Example Archaeological Data Recovery Plan Appendix H: Example Figures for Archaeological Reports Appendix I: Example Tables for Archaeological Reports xviii

TABLE OF CONTENTS continued Section 5 Examples and Appendices 5-1 Appendix J: Instructions for Completing the Iowa SHPO Review and Compliance Form, Blank Form, and an Example Appendix K: Instructions for Completing Archaeological Survey Short Report (ASSR) Forms in Iowa, Blank Forms, and an Example Appendix L: Instructions for Completing NADB Forms in Iowa, Blank Forms, Supporting Information, and an Example Appendix M: Instructions for Completing Iowa Archaeological Site Forms, Blank Forms, and an Example Appendix N: Iowa Advocate Archaeological Certification Application Appendix O: Blank Sample Letter for Project Consultation with American Indian Tribes and an Example Appendix P: Definitions of Terms Used in Guidelines Appendix Q: List of Abbreviations Used in These Guidelines Appendix R: Sources of Additional Information Appendix S: Sources of Additional Contacts xix

xx