Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 76. Mossburn

Similar documents
Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 11. Pukemutu

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 8. Sobig

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No Waiau

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 23. Waikiwi

2014 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam

2018 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam 1. Landscape positions characterizes the location of the soil on the landscape and identifies potential risks.

Examining soils in the field. Examining soils in the field. Environment Agency thinksoils examining soils in the field

2016 Iowa FFA Soils Evaluation CDE Exam

2012 FINAL SOILS AREA 2 Envirothon Questions Answer KEY

The entire site supports grass on which sheep had been grazing recently.

DO YOU KNOW YOUR SOILS? (Rev. 10/11)

Soil Horizons cont. Oa- highly decomposed Oi-undecomposed

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION WITTON PARK, COUNTY DURHAM PROPOSED QUARRY EXTENSION DECEMBER 1992

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

PROPOSED OPEN CAST COAL SITE SEPTEMBER 1992

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS BIRCH PIT, NEAR COLCHESTER ESSEX

Iowa FFA Soil Career Development Event 2008

Land Capability Classifications

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS LAND NEAR SHIRE HILL FARM SAFFRON WALDEN ESSEX

Pits 1 & 3 Questions. 7. Subsurface: Texture (5 pts) A. Coarse B. Moderately course C. Medium D. Fine E. Very Fine

Loam: About 40% sand, 40% silt, 20% clay. Mixture of pore sizes to balance water retention and aeration. Considered the best soil for growing crops.

Mature basalt volcanic soils

Soil Physical Properties

2016 Area 3 Envirothon Muskingum County Soils Test ANSWER KEY

THE TENNESSEE VEGETABLE GARDEN

SOIL SURVEY OF PORTIONS 81 AND 82 OFTHE FARM VAALBANK 512JQ, NEAR MAGALIESBURG, SOUTH-WEST OF PRETORIA

Soil Geography Notes JC-Learn. JC-Learn. Geography Notes Soil. 1 P a g e

AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND NEAR MINDALE HOUSE PRESTATYN. Report 762/1

Soil Interpretations Erosion and Sedimentation Control Planning and Design Workshop

Agricultural Land Classification and Statement of Physical Characteristics Higbfield Farm Whitley Bridge North Yorkshire October 1996

Soil resources in upper Basho Valley.

IOWA FFA STATE SOILS CDE SATURDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2007 AMES, IOWA

Report on the soil evaluation at Harakeke 2015 Ltd Properties, Tasman District, Nelson

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

1. Position (2 pts.) 2. Parent Material (2 pts.) 3. Slope Characteristics (2 pts.) 4. Surface Stoniness or Rockiness (2 pts.)

5 RESULTS FOR THE REJECT EMPLACEMENT AREA

PHYSICAL CHAtlACTERISTICS REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED SAND AND GRAVEL SITE AT MANOR FARM, UFFINGTON

AGRONOMY NOTES. Vol. 29, No. 5, 1996

Terminology & Soil Science. Andy Spetch

27/01/2017. This event is being run by SAC Consulting. What is Soil?

EDULABZ. Ans. (b) 7. The soft, porous layer with a good water-retaining capacity forms the

Soil Properties in the Rai/Pelorus Catchment. MDC Technical Report No:

Soil characteristics that influence nitrogen and water management

SOILS AND AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND OFF HOLT ROAD, ROSSETT. Report 1067/1

Soil Requirements of. Healthy Urban Trees

Restoration of Degraded Soils

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching

The issue of Protection of class I and class II soils in the One Plan

Site Selection. The #1 Most Important Step in Planting Anything Soils a major component. Physical Characteristics. Chemical Composition

Using Land Capability Classifications

Soil Properties in the Koromiko Area

Report on a soil survey and agricultural suitability investigation of the property known as Erf 660, De Doorns.

STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MISSOURI ASSESSOR MANUAL

Soils and Land Use Test

CORNFORTH EAST QUARRY COUNTY DURHAM

Unearthing problem soils in the Lachlan Valley

URBAN SOILS & SEATTLE EXAMPLES

Soils and plant nutrients

CONNECTICUT ENVIROTHON 2012 SOILS QUESTIONS

Horner-McLaughlin Woods: Soil Types

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS TYTTENHANGER QUARRY EXTENSION, LONDON COLNEY, HERTFORDSHIRE

5.1 Introduction to Soil Systems IB ESS Mrs. Page

2017 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam

Soil Structure, Density, and Porosity. Laboratory #4

Girtridge Monitor Farm Meeting

The Nature of Soil Soil Conservation Sustainable Ag.

Soil is the Key (Chapter 3)

Effects of the Bupa retirement complex on the soil resources at 25 & 35 Ulyatt Road, Napier

Drainage & wet soil management. Dr Bill Cotching

Soils and the Environment. A Summary of RI Envirothon Study Materials Compiled by Sally Paul

3.44b. Soil Classification AK & BR

Introduction to Environmental Science. Soil Characteristics. Chapter 11 Soil

Section 1. Judging the soil pit (questions 1-4)

Tilth: Tilth: Soil Structure and its Management. Tilth: Soil Structure and its Management

P/2014/00830 Received 27/06/2014 SOIL RESOURCES AND AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND AT ROLLESTON PARK FARM TUTBURY, STAFFORDSHIRE.

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

Area 3 Envirothon Soils Questions Key

PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS REPORT INCORPORATING AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION LAND AT BOLE INGS, WESTBURTON, NOTTINGHAMSHIRE (SK805875)

List of Equipment, Tools, Supplies, and Facilities:

Appendix 22 Soils and Land Capability

HEALTHY SOILS LANDHOLDER SERIES PROPERTY PLANNING GUIDE CHARACTERISTICS OF A HEALTHY SOIL LANDHOLDER SERIES - PROPERTY PLANNING GUIDE HEALTHY SOILS

Soil Chemistry. Key Terms.

1 Describe the concept of soil texture and its importance. 2 Determine the texture of a soil sample.

3. What are the five master horizons? Give distinguishing features of each. 5. List three means by which plant roots come into contact with nutrients.

If you are not able to turn in your notebook see me or Dan ASAP

2011 Wisconsin Envirothon Soils and Land Use Exam

Waipu clay - YU Waipu peaty sand - YUay

EARTH SCIENCE CONCEPTS -Geologic time scale

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS EXTENSION TO CLOUD HILL QUARRY, BREEDON ON THE HILL, LEICESTERSHIRE

Soil Management: the basis of sustainable agriculture

Assessing and Amending Your Garden Soil Craig Cogger, Soil Scientist Emeritus Washington State University Puyallup

Lesson 1: Recognizing the Characteristics of Soils and the Soil Requirements for Fruit and Nut Crops

SOIL CHARACTERIZATION USING DIAGNOSTIC PROPERTIES

CAVIL HEAD OCCS ACKLINGTON NOVEMBER 1997

Site Selection. The #1 Most Important Step in Planting Anything Soils a major component. Physical Characteristics. Chemical Composition

Level 1 Agricultural and Horticultural Science, 2011

SUMMARY. alcholnie.doc\ih\jk

ASCE - Philadelphia. Soils & Stormwater Management. Matthew C. Hostrander, CPSS, SEO Soil Scientist. Gilmore & Associates, Inc.

PASTURE AND HAY FIELDS: SOIL FUNDAMENTALS. Sanders County April 8, Clain Jones

Transcription:

This Technical Data Sheet describes the typical average properties of the specified soil. It is essentially a summary of information obtained from one or more profiles of this soil that were examined and described during the Topoclimate survey or previous surveys. It has been prepared in good faith by trained staff within time and budgetary limits. However, no responsibility or liability can be taken for the accuracy of the information and interpretations. Advise should be sought from soil and landuse experts before making landuse decisions on individual farms and paddocks. The characteristics of the soil at a specific location may differ in some details from those described here. No warranties are expressed or implied unless stated. Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 76 Soil name: Mossburn Overview Mossburn soils occupy about 5,700 ha on high terraces, fans and colluvial slopes flanking hill country in the Aparima and Oreti river valleys. They are formed into predominantly deep loess, sometimes mixed with colluvium from the adjacent hill country. They have silty textures and are poorly drained, with a dense fragipan at a depth of about 50cm which restricts water drainage. These soils respond well to mole and tile drainage, and are presently used for pastoral farming with sheep, deer and beef cattle. Climate is cool temperate with cold winters and regular rainfall. Soils seldom dry out. Soil classification NZ Soil Classification (NZSC): Fragic Perched-gley Pallic; stoneless, silty Previous NZ Genetic Classification: Weakly to moderately gleyed yellow-grey earth Classification explanation The NZSC of the Mossburn soils is consistent with the previous classification. Mossburn soils are poorly drained, due to perching of water on a dense fragipan. The subsoil above the fragipan also typically has high density, which limits root growth. Mossburn soils also have silty textures and P- retention of <30% throughout the profile, and are typically stone free Soil phases and variants Identified units in the Mossburn soils are: Mossburn undulating deep (MqU1): has no gravel within 90cm depth; occurs on slopes of 0 7 Mossburn rolling deep (MqR1): has no gravel within 90cm depth; occurs on slopes of 7 15 Mossburn undulating moderately deep (MqU2): has gravel between 45 and 90cm depth; occurs on slopes of 0 7 Mossburn rolling moderately deep (MqR2): has gravel between 45 and 90cm depth; occurs on slopes of 7 15 Mossburn hilly moderately deep (MqH2): has gravel between 45 and 90cm depth; occurs on slopes of 15 25 The soil properties described in this Technical Data Sheet are based on the most common phase, Mossburn undulating deep (MqU1). Values for other phases and variants can be taken as being similar. Where they differ significantly they are recorded with a separate versatility rating, e.g., Mossburn hilly moderately deep (MqH2). 1/5 Last updated 26/03/2003

Associated soils Some soils that commonly occur in association with Mossburn soils are: Tauringatura: well drained shallow soil formed on mixed greywacke and tuffaceous greywacke bedrock and colluvium of the Taringatura Hills Lintley: well drained shallow soil, formed from gravelly fan alluvium Makarewa: poorly drained gley soil, formed in floodplain alluvium Similar soils Some soils that have similar properties to Mossburn soils are: Pukemutu: has silty clay subsoil with a fragipan that occurs below 60cm depth. Waikoikoi: occurs on terraces and downlands in the Gore, northern Southland, west and south Otago areas; formed in loess, with no influence of colluvium. Hokonui: has clayey textures, and formed in mixed loess and alluvium on fans from the Hokonui Hills; has perch-gley properties but no fragipan Sobig: moderately deep to shallow soil, occuring on high terraces and fans; has perch-gley properties, but this is due to gravels being clay-bound Typical profile features The following is a generic or composite profile description representing the most common combination of characteristics for this soil type. The actual profiles for which descriptions and data are are listed at the end of this Technical Data Sheet. Mossburn profile Horizon Depth (cm) Description Apg Bg BCx(g) Apg 0 26 Greyish yellow-brown silt loam; few bright brown mottles; weak soil strength; moderately developed medium to coarse prismatic and fine to medium polyhedral structure; abundant roots Bg 26 45 Light yellow silt loam; common bright brown and few light grey mottles; common worm casts; weak soil strength; moderately developed very fine to medium polyhedral and coarse prismatic structure; abundant roots BCx(g) 45 90+ Yellowish brown silt loam; few light grey mottles and veins; few bright brown mottles and selvedges; firm soil strength; massive structure; few roots Key profile features Mossburn soils have a 18 25cm deep topsoil that has moderately developed structure. Subsoil structure is moderate to weak in the upper subsoil, abruptly changing in the lower subsoil to the massive structure of the fragipan. Greyish colours are dominant in the upper subsoil, indicating the poor drainage caused by water perching on the fragipan. 2/5

Typical physical properties Note: values in Italics are estimates Horizon Depth (cm) Bulk density Permeability Texture Gravel content Apg 0 26 Moderate High Moderate Silt loam Gravel free Bg 26 45 Moderate High Slow Silt loam Gravel free BCx(g) 45 90+ Moderate High Slow Silt loam Gravel free Profile drainage: Poor Plant readily water: Moderately high Potential : Rooting restriction: Slightly deep Fragipan Key physical properties Mossburn soils have a slightly deep potential that is severely restricted by the fragipan at 45 60cm depth. The soils are poorly drained, with slow permeability in the subsoil and limited aeration during sustained wet periods. Textures are typically silt loams, and topsoil clay content is typically 25 30%. Deep phases are stone free, but gravel occurs between 45 and 90cm in moderately deep phases. Typical chemical properties Depth Horizon ph P retention CEC BS Ca Mg K Na (cm) Apg 0 26 Moderate Moderate Moderate Low Moderate Low Very low Low Bg 26 45 Low Moderate Moderate Low Low Moderate Very low Low BCx(g) 45 90+ Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Low High Very low Low Key chemical properties Topsoil organic matter content is 5.0 6.5%; P-retention 25 35% and ph moderate (mid high 5s). Cation exchange is moderate with base saturation low. Available calcium levels are moderate with magnesium and potassium levels low. Reserve phosphorus and sulphur levels are also low. Micro nutrient levels are generally adequate although molybdenum responses in legumes and boron responses in brassicas can occur. 3/5

Vulnerability to environmental degradation Note: the vulnerability ratings given in the table below are generalised and should not be taken as absolutes for this soil type in all situations. The actual risk depends on the environmental and management conditions prevailing at a particular place and time. Specialist advice should be sought before making management decisions that may have environmental impacts. Where vulnerability ratings of Moderate to Very severe are indicated, advice may be sought from Environment Southland or a farm management consultant. Vulnerability factor Rating Vulnerability compared to other Southland soils Structural compaction severe These soils have a severe vulnerability to structural degradation by long-term cultivation, or compaction by heavy stocking and vehicles. This rating reflects the poor drainage, low clay and P-retention in the topsoil that results in low structural stability. Nutrient leaching slight These soils have a slight vulnerability to leaching to groundwater. This rating reflects the moderately high waterholding capacity and slow permeability of the fragipan, but leaching risk can be increased by lateral mole and tile drains. Topsoil erodibility by water moderate Due to the moderate to low clay content, topsoil erodibility in these soils is moderate. Erodibility is highly dependent on management, particularly when there is no vegetation cover. Organic matter loss slight Vulnerability to long-term decline in soil organic matter levels is partly dependent on soil properties and highly dependent on management practices (e.g., crop residue management and cultivation practices). Waterlogging severe These soils have a severe vulnerability to waterlogging during wet periods. This rating reflects the poor drainage and slow permeability of the subsoil. General landuse versatility ratings for Mossburn soils Note: The versatility ratings in the table below are indicative of the major limitations for semi-intensive to intensive landuse. These ratings differ from those used in the past in that sustainability factors are incorporated in the classification. Refer to the Topoclimate district soil map or property soil map to determine which of the soil symbols listed below are applicable, then check the versatility ratings for that symbol in the appropriate table. MqU1 (Mossburn undulating deep) MqU2 (Mossburn undulating moderately deep) Versatility evaluation for soil MqU1, MqU2 Non-arable horticulture Arable Inadequate aeration during wet periods; risk of shortterm waterlogging after heavy rain. Intensive pasture Risk of short-term waterlogging after heavy rain 4/5

MqR1 (Mossburn rolling deep) MqR2 (Mossburn rolling moderately deep) Versatility evaluation for soil MqR1, MqR2 Non-arable horticulture Arable Inadequate aeration during wet periods; rolling slopes. Intensive pasture Risk of short-term waterlogging after heavy rain MqH2 (Mossburn hilly moderately deep) Versatility evaluation for soil MqH2 Non-arable horticulture Unsuitable Hilly slopes Arable Unsuitable Hilly slopes Intensive pasture Risk of short-term waterlogging after heavy rain; hilly slopes Management practices that may improve soil versatility Careful management after heavy rain and wet periods will reduce the impact of short-term waterlogging. Intensive stocking, cultivation and heavy vehicular traffic use should be minimised during these periods. Installation and maintenance of subsurface mole and tile drainswill reduce the risk of short-term waterlogging. If compaction occurs, aeration at the correct moisture condition and depth can be of benefit. Soil profiles for Mossburn soils Soil symbol Profile ID Topoclimate map sheet Profile description Physical data Chemical data Profile photo MjU1 ONT6 25 MjU2 ZT10 43 MjR2 159/75/51 25 MjR1 159/75/5 43 Published by Crops for Southland with financial support from Environment Southland. Copyright 2002, Crops for Southland This Technical Data Sheet may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. Crops for Southland and Environment Southland would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this Technical Data Sheet as a source. No use of this Technical Data Sheet may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from Crops for Southland. Crops for Southland PO Box 1306, Invercargill. New Zealand www.cropssouthland.co.nz 5/5