Similar documents
Pits 1 & 3 Questions. 7. Subsurface: Texture (5 pts) A. Coarse B. Moderately course C. Medium D. Fine E. Very Fine

IOWA FFA STATE SOILS CDE SATURDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2007 AMES, IOWA

Iowa FFA Soil Career Development Event 2008

2018 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam 1. Landscape positions characterizes the location of the soil on the landscape and identifies potential risks.

2016 Iowa FFA Soils Evaluation CDE Exam

2014 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam

Land Capability Classifications

Team number Page 1 of Canon Envirothon Soils Station Test. Soils and Climate Change

1. Position (2 pts.) 2. Parent Material (2 pts.) 3. Slope Characteristics (2 pts.) 4. Surface Stoniness or Rockiness (2 pts.)

Lesson 3: Understanding Soil Color

Horner-McLaughlin Woods: Soil Types

2017 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam

LAND JUDGING AND SOIL EVALUATION

Soil Survey of San Luis Obispo County, California Paso Robles Area

California FFA Soil and Land Evaluation Manual

2011 Wisconsin Envirothon Soils and Land Use Exam

PHYSICAL CHAtlACTERISTICS REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED SAND AND GRAVEL SITE AT MANOR FARM, UFFINGTON

STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MISSOURI ASSESSOR MANUAL

Using Land Capability Classifications

Examining soils in the field. Examining soils in the field. Environment Agency thinksoils examining soils in the field

Land Judging in West Virginia

Land Judging and Homesite Evaluation Guidebook

Unit E: Basic Principles of Soil Science. Lesson 3: Understanding Soil Color

Soil Maps for Production Agriculture. Jarrod O. Miller, Extension Agronomist

A GUIDE FOR LAND JUDGING IN MICHIGAN. D. L. Mokma, E. Dersch and D. Kesselring

Parent Material & some of Seattle s soils

THE SCORE CARD. Observed Soil Properties. Interpretive Soil Properties

1 Describe the concept of soil texture and its importance. 2 Determine the texture of a soil sample.

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION WITTON PARK, COUNTY DURHAM PROPOSED QUARRY EXTENSION DECEMBER 1992

4H HPS 101 Land Judging In Oklahoma

TAXONOMIC CLASS: Loamy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Vitrandic Durochrepts

Land Judging and Homesite Evaluation in Florida 1

2012 FINAL SOILS AREA 2 Envirothon Questions Answer KEY

2016 Area 3 Envirothon Muskingum County Soils Test ANSWER KEY

A Guide for High School Land Judging Contests

Soils and Land Use Test

Soil Colors, Texture & Structure

DO YOU KNOW YOUR SOILS? (Rev. 10/11)

4-H Land Judging in Kentucky

Soil types of lake county

EXPERIMENT 6 PREPARATION OF LAND CAPABILITY CLASS MAP

Urban Soils Career Development Event

Soil Geography Notes JC-Learn. JC-Learn. Geography Notes Soil. 1 P a g e

Unit II Soil Management

Lesson 1: Identifying Texture in Soil

Soil Horizons cont. Oa- highly decomposed Oi-undecomposed

AND Homesite Judging in North Dakota

The entire site supports grass on which sheep had been grazing recently.

Waipu clay - YU Waipu peaty sand - YUay

List of Equipment, Tools, Supplies, and Facilities:

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 8. Sobig

Alluvium Bedrock Chemical Weathering Climate Glacial Till Loess Native Vegetation

Soils and the Environment. A Summary of RI Envirothon Study Materials Compiled by Sally Paul

CB1 Moderately undulating landscape with slight gilgai (few inches) formation: broad ridge tops and upper slopes of moderately shallow grey cracking

Sydney Road Reclaimed Water Main, Plant City, Florida. Prepared for: Jones Edmunds & Associates, Inc.

ONSITE EFFLUENT DISPOSAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN.

3.44b. Soil Classification AK & BR

During the field surveys, several species of wading birds and ducks were observed using permanently ponded areas.

Sam Houston Ranger District West/Central WUI Fuels Reduction Project Soil and Water Resources

Unknown 1. Unknown 2 TEXTURE ANALYSIS

EDULABZ. Ans. (b) 7. The soft, porous layer with a good water-retaining capacity forms the

Land Capability Class

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No Waiau

S-33 Revised May Minnesota Land ROGER S. HARRIS. /J U N I V E. R S I T Y 0 F M I N N E S 0 T A -H~ c~ geludce U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Science II Soil Science Soil Structure 50 minutes

PROPOSED OPEN CAST COAL SITE SEPTEMBER 1992

SOIL CHARACTERIZATION USING DIAGNOSTIC PROPERTIES

Instructions on Land Judging in Mississippi

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

2/10/2011. Arizona FFA Soil CDE Reference

FFA Urban Soil CDE. Items necessary for soil judging. FFA Land Judging Contest 2015

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

Section 1. Judging the soil pit (questions 1-4)

II We Fall-plow or Spring-plow

The Nature of Soil Soil Conservation Sustainable Ag.

AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND NEAR MINDALE HOUSE PRESTATYN. Report 762/1

Rural Soils Career Development Event

URBAN SOILS & SEATTLE EXAMPLES

27/01/2017. This event is being run by SAC Consulting. What is Soil?

Mature basalt volcanic soils

S-33 March Minnesota Land ROGER S. HARRIS HAROLD E. JONES

PERMANENT SEEDING. Overview of Sedimentation and Erosion Control Practices. Practice no. 6.11

LANDPKS TEACHING MANUAL

SOIL DATA: Avondale. in Allen, TX. This information was taken from NRCS web soil survey of Collin County, Texas.

P/2014/00830 Received 27/06/2014 SOIL RESOURCES AND AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND AT ROLLESTON PARK FARM TUTBURY, STAFFORDSHIRE.

SUMMARY. alcholnie.doc\ih\jk

DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL TAPI

The issue of Protection of class I and class II soils in the One Plan

SOILS AND AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND OFF HOLT ROAD, ROSSETT. Report 1067/1

Land Judging. in North Dakota

Soil Water Relationships

List of Equipment, Tools, Supplies, and Facilities:

AY-362-W. INDIANA SOIL Evaluation Field Book. Don Franzmeier, Gary Steinhardt, Cathy Egler Purdue University Department of Agronomy

Land Judging. in North Dakota

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching this lesson:

SUBSURFACE DRIP DISPERSAL OF EFFLUENT for LARGE SYSTEMS. Presented by: David Morgan and Rodney Ruskin

Guide for Applying Conservation Treatments for Land Evaluation (Last updated by Erika Hill, NARD) LAND TREATMENT

SETEC SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, INC

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

Swan Coastal Plain - Reading

Transcription:

*2301001* Pit #1 ontestant #1 Team #1 alifornia DE - Soil and Land Evaluation Group: 1 ontestant: 1 SURFE SOIL (Fill in ONE bubble for each item). D 1. OLOR (5) 2. TEXTURE (5) 3. GRVEL ND ROK (3) 4. THIKNESS (3) Very Dark lack, Very Dark Gray, Very Dark rown,or Dusky Red Medium or right rown, Yellowish or Reddish rown, rown Yellow, or Red Very Light White, Light Grey, Pale rown, Pale Yellow, Pale Red Drab or Mottled Dull Gray, Olive, luish Gray, Grey rown, Yellow Spotted oarse ourse, Medium, Fine or Loamy Sands Medium Sandy Loam, Loam, Silt Loam or Silt Fine Sandy lay Loam, lay Loam, or Silty lay Loam Very Fine Sandy lay, lay, or Silty lay SU SOIL (Fill in ONE bubble for each item or if no SUSOIL is present mark NONE for EH item. None to Few <15% by Volume Moderate ffects Farming Operation 15-35% Severe From 36-60% Extreme Prevents Farming Operation > 60% Very Thick 20 Inches or more Thick 10 through 19 Inches Thin 4 through 9 Inches Very Thin Less Than 4 Inches 5. OLOR (5) 6. TEXTURE (5) 7. THIKNESS (3) None (no Subsoil) D D None (no Subsoil) D None (no Subsoil) D E Very Dark lack, Very Dark Gray, Very Dark rown,or Dusky Red Medium or right Dark rown, Yellowish or Reddish rown, rown Yellow, or Red Very Light White, Light Grey, Pale rown, Pale Yellow, Pale Red Drab or Mottled Dull Gray, Olive, luish Gray, Grey rown, Yellow Spotted D E oarse ourse, Medium, Fine or Loamy Sands Medium Sandy Loam, Loam, Silt Loam or Silt Fine Sandy lay Loam, lay Loam, or Silty lay Loam Very Fine Sandy lay, lay, or Silty lay D E Very Thick 20 Inches or more Thick 10 through 19 Inches Thin 4 through 9 Inches Very Thin Less Than 4 Inches INTERPRETTION OF SOIL FETIURES (Fill in ONE bubble for each item). D 8. Type of Material that Limits Depth (5) None No Limiting Material edrock Soft or Hard Hardpan emented Extremely Gravelly Material or high water table D 9. Parent or Underlying Material (5) Hard edrock Soft edrock Loose or Mixed Material Organic Materials Peat or Muck D 10. Depth of Soil Favorable for Roots Water Penetration (5) Very Deep 60 inches or more Deep 40 through 59 inches Moderately Deep 20 through 39 inches Shallow Less than 20 inches D 11. ir and Water Movement (5) Very Rapid Open: Single Grain Rapid Open and Porous: Granular or rumb Structure Moderate Slightly ompact: Granular or locky Structure Slow ompact: locky Prismatic Structure or Massive D 12. vailable Water Holding apacity to 60 Inches (5) High > 7.5 inches Medium 5 to 7.5" Low 3.5 to 5 inches Very Low Less Than 3.5 inches

ELERTED EROSION (Fill in ONE bubble for each item). 13. mount of Erosion or Evidence of Deposition (3) D None to Slight Less than or equal to 10% Moderate Less than or equal to 25% High or Severe Greater than 25% Evidence of Damaging Deposition 14. Kind of Erosion (3) None Evidence of Sheet or Rill Erosion ctive Gully or Streambank Erosion Evidence of Wind Erosion 17. LND PILITY LSSIFITION (Fill in ONE bubble ONLY). (8) LSS I No Special Problems - Very Good Land TOPOGRPHY or LY OF LND (Fill in ONE bubble for each item). 15. Landscape Position (3) 16. Steepness of Slope (5) Upland Soil Developed From Underlying edrock Terrace, Foot Slope, Dune Land, Old lluvial Fans Soil From Transported Materials ----------Land Suitable for ultivated rops --------- ---------- Land Suitable for Permanent Vegetation -------- D LSS II LSS III LSS IV Some Limitations or Problems-Good Land Many Limitations or omplex Problems Very Limited in rop Use or Very omplex Problems 19. MJOR PROLEMS IN USE (5) (Fill in ONE to THREE bubbles for identifying the MOST IMPORTNT PROLEMS(S). D E F G H None Erosion Slope Shallow Soil Problems Fineness or ompaction Dense or Hard Pan ourseness or Dryness Wetness or Flooding D LSS V LSS VI LSS VII LSS VIII LND MNGEMENT NEEDS None ottomland Recent lluvial Fans, Flood Plains asin Irrigation Management or Drainage Erosion ontrol Fertility Improvement Pratices hiseling or Ripping Grazing Management Flat, Ponded or Lake ed Deposits, Playas Nearly Level Grazing Land, Few Grazing Limitations Grazing or Woodland- Some Restrictions Range or Woodland - Severe Limitations Wildlife, Recreation, or Watershed 20. gricultural Management Pratices (3) Woodland Management URN LND LIMITTION (5) Fill in one bubble on each line for Slight, Moderate, or Severe SLIGHT MODERTE SEVERE 23. Limitation for Septic Tank Filter Fields 24. Limitations for Shrink-Swell 25. Limations for Foundations without asement 26. Limations for Local Roads and Streets 27. Limitations for Top Soil D E F G E F G H D 18. LND USE (5) Irrigated rops uilding Sites Non-Irrigated rops Range Woodland Nearly Level Less than or equal to 2% Gently Sloping Less than or equal to 5% Moderate Sloping Less than or equal to 15% Strongly Sloping Less than or equal to 25% Steep Greater then 25% Wildlife, Recreation, Watershed (Fill in 1-3 bubbles for each item Indicating the PRIORITY for the Practice(s) Needed) 21. Erosion ontrol Practices (3) D None D E F Vegetative over and Mulches ontour Farming and/or Terraces and Waterways Gully or Streambank Stabilization D E (Fill in bubbles for ONE to THREE lines to identify the most intensive use(s).) 22. Irrgation Method (3) D E F None Flood Furrow Sprinkler Drip Sub-Irrigation Soil and Land Evaluation Pit #1 (Side 2) ontestant: 1