Joe Pool Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 23, 2017

Similar documents
Lewisville Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 2 & 4, 2017

Canyon Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting March 18, 2016

Lake O the Pines Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting April 25 & 27, 2017

Public Information Meeting

Joe Pool Lake Lake Master Plan Public Information Meeting Presentation of Final Draft Revision July 31, 2018

EAU GALLE PROJECT MASTER PLAN APPENDIX C PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District Prado Basin Project Updates

Raystown Lake Master Plan Revision. Public Meeting April 25 & 26, 2018 How does the revision process work?

Pine Flat Lake Master Plan Update FACT SHEET September 2014

G. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT. The following summarizes the Recreation and Open Space Element:

Parks and Open Space Preservation and Dedication. January 26, 2016 Fort Worth City Council Pre-Council Meeting Randle Harwood and Richard Zavala

Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Draft Vers

Chapter 5: Natural Resources and Environment

Summary of Changes in the DRAFT Rivers Project Natural Resource Master Plan from the 2001 approved plan to 2014 plan

This page intentionally blank.

RECREATION, OPEN SPACE AND GREENWAYS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Chapter 5: Recreation

Welcome. to the Bull Shoals Lake Master Plan Revision Open House

Preface. Erie. Scranton. Allentown. Pittsburgh. Harrisburg. Philadelphia

Provide and maintain sufficient public parks, recreation facilities, and open space to meet the recreational needs of County residents and visitors.

SCC PRD (2016) COUNTY PARK MASTER PLAN

PARKS AND RECREATION

PARTF Scoring System for Grants

Master Plan Objectives and Policies

The City shall enhance and improve the accessibility of parks and recreational facilities while protecting their quality. by:

2.4 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Goals, Objectives and Policies

Yadkin River Greenway Feasibility Study Fact Sheet Village of Clemmons, Town of Lewisville, Town of Bermuda Run

Town of Peru Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary

STEWARDSHIP OF LONG ISLAND SOUND S ECOLOGICAL AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCES

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Department of Community Development. Planning and Environmental Review Division Revised Notice of Preparation

CONSERVATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

ADDENDUM TO BIOLOGICAL SCOPING SURVEY REPORT, BOTANICAL SURVEY AND WETLAND DELINEATION

Chapter PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS

Draft Stillwater 2030 Comprehensive Plan- Goals and Policies

2011 ASLA Design Awards. Westside Creeks Restoration Plan Merit Award AECOM, Fort Collins. Planning & Urban Design

City of Missoula and Missoula County Open Space Planning Open House

Shoreline Master Program Town of La Conner, Washington

Pinellas County Greenways

DISCUSSION TOPIC: ST JOHNS RIVER & ITS TRIBUTARIES (BPII) 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICES AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

DRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

STREAM BUFFERS

Support the implementation of Cape Coral's Comprehensive Plan. Protect and utilize the unique natural resources in the City.

EL DORADO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT PRINCIPLE INTRODUCTION STATE AUTHORIZATION

Arkansas River Corridor

San Diego River Coalition 2012 Work Plan

Please read the entire document

Appendices. Contents. Appendices - Sep 1997 CP-1 AP-1

Lake Arlington Master Plan. Presented by Randle Harwood, Planning and Development Director October 27, 2015

Parks, Trails, and Open space Element

Town of Lyons Parks Flood Recovery Planning Process. Photograph courtesy of Ed Bruder

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

City of Nogales General Plan

{Best Practices. Summary of Tools, Strategies and Best Practices from 11 Michigan Case Study Communities

The Trust for Public Land. in Minnesota

Community Conservation Workshop. Lake Placid

CHAPTER 1 Introduction

LAND USE MANAGEMENT PLAN ARTICLE

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

SECTION FOUR: MISSION STATEMENT, GOALS & OBJECTIVES

Mark Greenig Recreation and Land Use Planner CH2M Hill

Silverwood Masterplan Kickoff Meeting. Jim Neidhart Dane County Parks Planning

Zoning Ordinance Article 3

Central Lake Ontario Conservation Conservation Lands Master Plan

SALISBURY TOMORROW Our Vision

Chapter 10 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS

Wisconsin downtown action council Downtown project case study profile

CHAPTER 4 FUTURE LAND USE AND URBAN SERVICES DISTRICTS

Staff will be providing an overview of the project need, purpose and intent for consideration as part of the Amendment cycle.

OPEN SPACE CHAPTER 7: OVERVIEW. Preserve open space to protect natural resources, enhance character and provide passive recreation opportunities

McArthur Swamp Planning Unit. Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat MCARTHUR SWAMP PLANNING UNIT

BUDGETING FOR OUTCOMES TRINITY RIVER CORRIDOR

CHAPTER 13 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT

Sacramento County Regional Parks American River Parkway Group Activity & Special Event Procedures

RIDGES TO RIVERS OPEN SPACE NETWORI< OF THE MID-COLUMBIA DRAFT ACTION PLAN

1. Parks & Recreation Neighborhood Parks Community Parks Special Use Sites 2. Open Space 3. Trails

Rocky Areas Project Guidance HABITAT

Parks, Trails, and Open Space Element

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) ; TDD (651)

Dwelling Units Max 12 dwelling units per acre/min 8 dwelling units per acre. Development Mix 80% non residential/20% residential

WELCOME! 8 8:30 6: TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Open House. Presentation & Q&A

The Trinity River Corridor Project Update

SUSTAINABILITY PLAN OTTAWA COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION FALL 2017

WATERLOO RECREATION AREA PHASE 2 LONG-RANGE ACTION GOALS. September 2012

13 Maintenance and Operations Plan 223

Auke Bay Area Plan. Complete List of Goals and Policies for the Auke Bay Area Plan

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Section 4: Goals, Objectives, and Strategies

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

LICENSES FOR UTILITY CROSSINGS OF PUBLIC LANDS AND WATERS ACCORDING TO MINNESOTA RULES CHAPTER [Rules Effective July 1, 2004]

RESPONSES TO PUBLIC CONCERNS AND QUESTIONS

ADOPTION OF THE REVISED OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN

Chapter 6: Community Character

glenwood canyon design process I-70 Statement of Direction TRG Recreation Subcommittee Colorado Division of Highways August 11, 1976 prepared by the

Atlanta BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study. Scoping Meeting August 2008

Ottawa County Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan. February, 2006

City of Fort Lupton Site Plan Process

Member Service Plan Sierra Nevada AmeriCorps Partnership

Transcription:

Joe Pool Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 23, 2017 Presented By Jason Owen Lake Manager U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Fort Worth District US Army Corps of Engineers

Purpose of this Meeting Describe Purpose of Master Plan Describe the Revision Process Answer Questions Seek Your Participation & Input Explain Why Revision is Needed

The Corps Vision for Joe Pool Lake The land, water surface and recreational resources of Joe Pool Lake will be managed to protect, conserve, and sustain natural and cultural resources, especially environmentally sensitive resources, and provide outdoor recreation opportunities that complement overall project purposes for the benefit of present and future generations.

Purpose of Master Plans The Corps defines a Master Plan as The strategic land use management document that guides the comprehensive management and development of all project recreational, natural and cultural resources throughout the life of the water resource development project. Source: Chapter 3 of EP 1130-2-550 available at www.usace.army.mil/library/publications

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 Applies to federal actions that affect the environment such as Master Plan revisions Requires federal agencies to CONSIDER and DOCUMENT the environmental impacts of their proposed actions as part of an agency s OVERALL planning and decision-making Requires federal agencies to cooperate with other federal, state and local governments as well as with organizations and citizens during project planning Scoping is where the federal agency asks for initial input from other agencies, citizens and organizations regarding project area, resources and uses

Key Points Regarding Master Plans Main focus is stewardship of natural and cultural resources and operation of quality outdoor recreation areas Proposed effective life of a Master Plan is 25 years Recreational use of the water surface is addressed

Additional Key Points Key sections of the Master Plan Revision include resource management objectives revised land use classifications management plan for each land classification Potential outcomes could be designation of lands for utility corridors, environmentally sensitive areas Protection of environmentally sensitive areas is given priority

What Master Plans Are Not Master Plans do not address in detail the technical aspects of Regional water quality Water management for flood risk management, Water supply or water level management Shoreline management

What Will Not be Addressed National policy places strict limitations on the proposed construction of new public roads on Corps lands. With few exceptions road proposals that would cross federal land will not be addressed. Shoreline policy governing mowing, removal of vegetation and debris as well as pedestrian paths will not be addressed in the Master Plan.

Stakeholders Stakeholder input is very important to the process. They include: The general public Surrounding cities Agencies that manage lands and resources, such as State and Federal wildlife agencies Concessionaires Tribes Historical and Cultural Societies Visitors and residents of the Lake

What About Drought/Flood? Master Plans cannot change how water in the lake is managed addressed in separate Water Control Plan Natural resources and recreation management must be implemented within the constraints of the primary missions of flood risk management and water supply

Why Revise the Joe Pool Lake Master Plan? Current Master Plan is dated June 1979 with major supplements in 1981 and has exceeded its useful life. Given the rapid pace of development and population growth surrounding the lake it is time to take a fresh look at the management of Federal lands around the lake. The Master Plan needs to reflect the current management status of Federal lands including the shift in park management from Trinity River Authority to the City of Grand Prairie, expansion of Cedar Hill State Park, and recognition of possible Environmentally Sensitive Areas

Joe Pool Lake Missions Flood Risk Management a primary mission Water Supply a primary mission Environmental Stewardship an inherent mission Recreation a secondary mission

Fast Facts about Joe Pool Lake Created by the construction of Joe Pool Dam in 1986. The main body of the lake is in Dallas County with the upper ends of the two arms extending into Tarrant and Ellis counties TRA is the local sponsor for the lake and controls the water rights. TRA has committed 100% of the available water supply to the cities of Cedar Hill, Duncanville, Grand Prairie and the Midlothian Water District. At conservation (normal) pool elevation 522.0 NGVD the lake covers 7,470 acres At the flood control pool elevation 536.0 NGVD the lake covers 10,940 acres

Fast Facts about Joe Pool Lake Highly urbanized lake bordered by the cities of Grand Prairie and Cedar Hill Excellent full service park areas operated through lease agreements with TPWD and City of Grand Prairie Popular hike and bike trail over the dam Joe Pool Lake is a major contributor to public recreation space in Dallas and Tarrant Counties where per capita acres of public recreation land is approximately.01 and.02 acres respectively* * 2012 Texas Outdoor Recreation Plan

Master Plan Revision Process Accomplished by a team of Corps employees with input from other agencies Public and stakeholder input will be carefully considered An Environmental Assessment of the Master Plan will be prepared and included as an appendix

The Master Planning Process Data Collection Agency/Public Scoping 23 May 2017 Resource Analysis Development of Land Classifications and Resource Objectives Agency/Public Review Finalize Master Plan Based on Comments Received Adoption of Master Plan Revision Where we are today

Possible Changes Needed in the Current Master Plan Re-examine the classification of project lands and the water surface Portions of currently designated parks and even non-park areas could be reclassified as environmentally sensitive area Establish utility corridors to reduce environmental and aesthetic damage Updates to existing park development plans

Additional Changes Needed Prepare new Resource Objectives Need current recreation objectives that reflect recreational use trends identified by 2012 Texas Outdoor Recreation Plan (by TPWD) and through public and stakeholder input Need current natural resource objectives that reflect habitat and open space needs identified in the 2012 Texas Conservation Action Plan (by TPWD) and public input and stakeholder input

Joe Pool Lake Land Classification Current Land Classifications Proposed New Land Classifications Project Operations Recreation High Use Project Operations High Density Recreation Recreation / Wildlife Management Low Use Interim Wildlife Management Environmentally Sensitive Areas Multiple Resource Management -Low Density Recreation -Wildlife Management -Vegetation Management -Future/Inactive Recreation Specific Recreation Lands Water Surface High Speed Boating Low Speed Boating Restricted Water Surface - Open Recreation - Designated No Wake - F & W Sanctuary - Restricted

BUILDING STRONG

Land Classification Project Operations High Density Recreation Multiple Resource Management Environmentally Sensitive Areas Easement Lands Definition Those lands required for the dam, operations center, office, maintenance compound and other areas that are used solely for project operations Land developed for intensive recreational activities by the visiting public, including developed recreation areas and areas for marinas and related concessions, and resorts Recreation Low Density: Activities such as hiking, primitive camping, wildlife observation, and hunting Wildlife Management General: Fish and wildlife management activities Vegetative Management: Management activities for the protection and development of a specific vegetative cover Inactive and/or Future Recreation Areas: Recreation areas planned for the future or that have been temporarily closed Areas where scientific, ecological, cultural or aesthetic features have been identified. These areas must be considered by management to ensure they are not adversely impacted All land for which USACE holds an easement interest but not fee title. Planned use and management of easement lands will be in strict accordance with the terms and conditions of the easement estate acquired for the project Definitions from USACE Engineer Pamphlet 1130-2-550: Recreation Operations and Maintenance Guidance and Procedures

Water Surface Classification Restricted Designated No-Wake Fish and Wildlife Sanctuary Open Recreation Definition Water areas restricted for project operations, safety, and security purposes To protect environmentally sensitive shoreline areas, recreational water access areas from disturbance, and for public safety Annual or seasonal restrictions on areas to protect fish and wildlife species during periods of migration, resting, feeding, nesting, and/or spawning Those waters available for year round or seasonal water-based recreational use Definitions from USACE Engineer Pamphlet 1130-2-550: Recreation Operations and Maintenance Guidance and Procedures

Land Classifications Project Operations - This category includes those lands required for the dam and spillway, levees, dikes, offices, maintenance facilities, and other areas that are used solely for the operation of the project Insert Image of dam

Land Classifications High Density Recreation - Lands developed for intensive recreational activities for the visiting public such as day use parks, campgrounds as well as concessions like marinas and resorts. Insert image of HDR @ LE

Land Classifications Environmentally Sensitive Areas - Areas where scientific, ecological, cultural or aesthetic features have been identified. Designation of these lands is not limited to just lands that are otherwise protected by laws such as the Endangered Species Act, the National Historic Preservation Act or applicable State statutes. These areas must be considered by management to ensure they are not adversely impacted. Examples may include mature bottomland forests, river and stream corridors, scenic bluffs, and native prairie. Insert image of ESA @ LE

Land Classifications Low Density Recreation - Lands with minimal development or infrastructure that support passive public recreational use (e.g. primitive camping, fishing, hunting, trails, wildlife viewing, etc.)

Land Classifications Wildlife Management - Lands designated for stewardship of fish and wildlife resources

Land Classifications Vegetative Management - Lands designated for stewardship of forest, prairie, and other native vegetative cover

Water Classifications Water Surface- Restricted Water Surface-Designated No Wake Insert images Water Surface-Fish and Wildlife Sanctuary Water Surface- Open Recreation Designated Beaches are Restricted Water Surface

Utility Corridors Linear strips of federal land used for consolidation of multiple utility lines Establish only where no viable alternative to crossing Federal land exists Main purpose is to reduce negative environmental Impacts Generally follow existing roads or utility lines Examples of Existing Corridors at Lewisville Lake

Recreation Objective: Potential Resource Objectives Expand existing trails and create new trails for a variety of users Extend key boat ramps to accommodate low lake levels Leasing lands to other entities Adjustment to the lake s boating capacity Natural Resource Objective: Restore degraded prairie sites to support a diversity of native grasses and forbs Implement invasive species control programs Identify and protect environmentally sensitive areas Refine wildlife management programs General Objective: Reduce encroachments and trespass through improved boundary marking and surveillance

Attend Meetings Visit our website at: http://www.swf.usace.army.mil/about/lakes-and- Recreation-Information/Master-Plan-Updates Send us an e-mail: joepool-mp@usace.army.mil Use the comment form provided Visit with Corps personnel Tell your friends How Can I Participate? Fill out a comment card now or take it home and send later (30 days)

Master Plan Next Steps Typical lake master plan update will take 18-36 months to finalize. Joe Pool Lake Master Plan revision is in the early stage of development First 30-day public comment 23 May thru 23 June 2017 Draft MP / EA public meeting in Spring of 2018, followed by another 30-day Public/Agency comment period Final document: 6-8 months after release of draft (Fall 2018)

The End Please feel free to visit with staff members, view the maps, ask questions and help us produce an excellent Master Plan Insert image