WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE OPEN HOUSE?

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE OPEN HOUSE? OPEN HOUSE PURPOSE The purpose of the open house is to provide an update on the study process and introduce the preliminary concept alternatives. The open house provides an opportunity to display the preliminary concept alternatives and ask for input before screening the concepts down to three alternatives for more detailed evaluation. YOUR COMMENTS Comment forms are available for you to provide input regarding the study. These can be placed in the comment box upon completion or mailed back within one week of this open house. CONTACT INFORMATION Jeff Holstein, City Transportation Engineer City of 5200 85th Avenue N., MN 55443 763-493-8102 jeff.holstein@brooklynpark.org Open house information can be found on the project website: http://projects.srfconsulting.com/hwy169and101st/

WHY ARE WE CONDUCTING THIS STUDY? STUDY PURPOSE To determine the ultimate geometry of TH 169 between TH 610 and nue, which may include a new interchange near 101st Avenue, and to identify a supporting roadway system for the area that can be implemented over time. STUDY OUTCOMES A range of system alternatives will be developed, evaluated, and scoped for implementation by the study partners. This effort will enable us to guide future land use and local infrastructure improvements, as well as garner support for the adoption of official maps. Products will include transportation system alternatives for future implementation.

WHO IS GUIDING THE STUDY? PROJECT PROCESS 1 2 3 4 BASELINE INPUT DEVELOP SYSTEM NEEDS ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT & REFINEMENT DOCUMENTATION OF SYSTEM PLANS FUTURE PHASES ISSUES & CONSTRAINTS GOALS REQUIREMENTS & STANDARDS Traffic Forecasts BASELINEALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT & EVALUATION Additional Forecasts DEVELOP SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES Additional Screening Detailed Analysis SCREEN TO THREEALTERNATIVES Additional Refinement STUDY OUTCOME CORRIDOR VISION IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Preliminary Layout Project Scoping & Programming Design, Engineering & Implementation Environmental Documentation ONGOINGPUBLIC &AGENCYINVOLVEMENT PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS City of City of City of City of MnDOT Hennepin County Metropolitan Council Metro Transit Three Rivers District Area Residents, Businesses, and Land Owners PROJECT SCHEDULE Base Alternatives... Winter 2013 Public Open House... Winter 2014 Alternatives Refinement... Spring 2014 Public Open House... Summer 2014 Documentation of System Plan...Summer/Fall 2014

HOW DO EXISTING INTERSECTIONS CURRENTLY OPERATE? A.M. PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS Dayton 114th Ave Coon Rapids Zachary Ln + Oak Pkwy Hampshire Ave Zane Ave Under Capacity At/Near Capacity Over Capacity P.M. PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS Dayton 114th Ave Coon Rapids Zachary Ln + Oak Pkwy Hampshire Ave Zane Ave Under Capacity At/Near Capacity Over Capacity

WHERE ARE THE FUTURE INTERSECTION CAPACITY PROBLEMS WITHOUT IMPROVEMENTS? 2030 NO BUILD A.M. PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS 114th Ave Dayton Coon Rapids Zachary Ln + Oak Pkwy Hampshire Ave Zane Ave Under Capacity At/Near Capacity Over Capacity 2030 NO BUILD P.M. PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS 114th Ave Dayton Coon Rapids Zachary Ln + Oak Pkwy Hampshire Ave Zane Ave Under Capacity At/Near Capacity Over Capacity Notes: Assumes nue as a four-lane facility south of nue and intersection improvements at nue and Oak way to accommodate planned development. Traffic signal, intersection and capacity improvements will be analyzed in the detailed evaluation of the three selected alternatives.

HOW WILL THE PRELIMINARY CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES BE SCREENED? The initial set of interchanges and supporting roadway alternatives will be evaluated using the following preliminary screening criteria, in order to identify up to three alternatives that best meet the overall study goals: PRELIMINARY SCREENING CRITERIA DESCRIPTION A Ability to accommodate key (major) traffic movements Assess the ability to accommodate major traffic movements to and from the south at existing and proposed interchanges and key arterial intersections B Limits impact to adjacent properties Visual inspection of alignments to determine scale of impact to existing developed and planned properties C Limits impact to key environmental features Visual inspection of alignments to determine scale of impact to environmental features such as wetlands and 4f/6f properties D E F Ability to enhance how the transportation system functions Ability to serve regional trips and support existing and future land use Ability to support future plans for Bottineau LRT in the area Assess the ability to enhance mobility, continuity and connectivity Assess the ability to balance trips at the regional access points (TH 169 and TH 610) and provide adequate local access and circulation to adjacent properties Assess how the alternative aligns and works with future Bottineau LRT operations in the study area, including a potential park and ride lot and an operations and maintenance facility G Cost/feasibility Consider constructability of the interchange, as well as magnitude of initial costs associated with adjacent arterial and local street connections H Ability to stage improvements over time Assess the ability to stage the construction of future infrastructure improvements I Ability to maintain the Rush Creek Regional Trail while providing an acceptable alignment, access, crossings and user-experience Assess how the alternative aligns and facilitates the in the study area, including the bridge crossing at TH 169 near nue J Limits impact to TH 169 and TH 610 Assess how the alternative minimizes impacts to the TH 169/610 Interchange and accommodates weaving along TH 169 Note: Traffic operations and safety will be analyzed in the detailed evaluation of the three selected alternatives.

ALTERNATIVE #1 - Overpass at nue Alternative #1 Overpass at nue TH 169 access closure at nue Maintains current trail alignment Summary )y The overpass alternative is defined as a future scenario in which access to TH 169 would be closed at nue and a bridge over TH 169 would be constructed. Does not accommodate projected build-out traffic demands to and from the south. Does not impact the. Oxbow Creek Dr Limits the function of Oak way in the overall street network. Requires trips to and from the regional transportation system to use current access points at TH 169/109th Avenue and/or TH 610/nue. These access points are expected to require significant improvements to address operational problems. Potential LRT O&M Facility Accommodates future plans for Bottineau LRT with modifications to the local street system. Results in a slight loss of access to and from the regional transportation system. Oak Pkwy Trails s [ Wetlands Parcels Proposed Project Improvements Other Supporting Roadway Improvements Proposed Trail Improvements

ALTERNATIVE #2 - Folded Diamond Interchange at nue Alternative #2 Folded Diamond Interchange at nue TH 169 auxiliary lanes (TH 610 to nue) Maintains current trail alignment )y Summary Accommodates projected build-out traffic demands to and from the south. Limited impacts to existing and planned development. Minimizes impacts to the. Oxbow Creek Dr Balances trips at the regional access points while providing reasonable local access and circulation. Accommodates future plans for Bottineau LRT with modifications to the local street system. Potential to stage improvements as redevelopment/ development occurs, but requires temporary loss of access at nue. Concerns with close spacing to the TH 610 interchange. Potential LRT O&M Facility Oak Pkwy Trails s [ Wetlands Parcels Proposed Project Improvements Other Supporting Roadway Improvements Proposed Trail Improvements

ALTERNATIVE #3 - Folded Diamond North Interchange at 103rd Avenue Alternative #3 Folded Diamond Interchange North at 103rd Avenue TH 169 northbound auxiliary lane (Interchange to 109th Avenue) Overpass at nue )y Maintains current trail alignment Summary Accommodates projected build-out traffic demands to and from the south. Limited impacts to existing and planned development. Oxbow Creek Dr Does not impact the. Limits the function of Oak way in the overall street system. Balances trips at the regional access points while providing reasonable local access and circulation. Accommodates future plans for Bottineau LRT with modifications to the local street system. Potential LRT O&M Facility Oak Pkwy Concerns with higher costs due to two bridges. Potential to stage improvements as redevelopment/ development occurs, but requires temporary loss of access at nue. Provides better spacing to the TH 610 interchange, while requiring a northbound auxiliary lane along TH 169 to address spacing to nue. Creates additional major intersections at nue and Jefferson Highway, which results in heavy turning movements at some intersections. Trails s [ Wetlands Parcels Proposed Project Improvements Other Supporting Roadway Improvements Proposed Trail Improvements

ALTERNATIVE #4 - Buttonhook Interchange at nue Alternative #4 Buttonhook Interchange at nue TH 169 auxiliary lanes (TH 610 to Interchange) Overpass at Oak way )y Maintains current trail alignment Summary Accommodates projected build-out traffic demands to and from the south. Limited impacts to existing and planned development. Oxbow Creek Dr Does not impact the. Balances trips at the regional access points while providing reasonable local access and circulation. Accommodates future plans for Bottineau LRT with modifications to the local street system. Potential to stage improvements as redevelopment/ development occurs, without loss of nue access. Concerns with close spacing to the TH 610 interchange. Potential LRT O&M Facility Oak Pkwy Trails s [ Wetlands Parcels Proposed Project Improvements Other Supporting Roadway Improvements Proposed Trail Improvements

ALTERNATIVE #5 - Buttonhook Interchange North at 103rd Avenue Alternative #5 Buttonhook Interchange North at 103rd Avenue TH 169 northbound auxiliary lane (Interchange to 109th Avenue) Overpass at nue )y Maintains current trail alignment Summary Accommodates projected build-out traffic demands to and from the south, but requires increased travel to access the nue overpass. Oxbow Creek Dr Minimal impacts to existing and planned development. Minimizes impacts to the. Limits the function of Oak parkway in the overall street system. Balances trips at the regional access points, but requires circuitous travel for adjacent properties. Potential LRT O&M Facility Oak Pkwy Accommodates future plans for Bottineau LRT with modifications to the local street system. Potential to stage improvements as redevelopment/ development occurs, but requires temporary loss of 101st Avenue access. Provides better spacing to the TH 610 interchange, while requiring a northbound auxiliary lane along TH 169 to address spacing to nue. Creates additional major intersections at nue and Jefferson Highway, which results in heavy turning movements at some intersections. Trails s [ Wetlands Parcels Proposed Project Improvements Other Supporting Roadway Improvements Proposed Trail Improvements

ALTERNATIVE #6 - Diamond Interchange at 105th Avenue and Overpass at nue Alternative #6 Diamond Interchange at 105th Avenue and Overpass at nue Re-alignment of nue Overpass at nue )y Maintains current trail alignment Summary Does not accommodate projected build-out traffic demands to and from the south and eliminates access at nue. Similar to existing conditions with no increase in TH 169 access. Oxbow Creek Dr Significant impacts to planned development in and existing development in. Does not impact to the. Eliminates north-south continuity on County road system (nue and nue) Limits the function of Oak parkway in the overall street system. Potential LRT O&M Facility Oak Pkwy Requires trips to and from the regional transportation system to access the future TH 169 interchange and/or the nue interchange at TH 610. Removal of access at nue will impact nearby intersections. Accommodates future plans from Bottineau LRT. Potential to stage improvements as redevelopment/ development occurs, without loss of nue access. Concerns with higher costs due to two bridges. Provides better spacing to the TH 610 interchange. Creates additional major intersections at nue and Jefferson Highway, which results in heavy turning movements at some intersections. Trails s [ Wetlands Parcels Proposed Project Improvements Other Supporting Roadway Improvements Proposed Trail Improvements

WHAT ARE THE NEXT STEPS? SCREENING OF CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES DETAILED EVALUATION OF THREE ALTERNATIVES THIRD OPEN HOUSE