Planning Roles. Responsibilities

Similar documents
Lesson 6. Corridor Planning

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION

Complete Streets in Lancaster County

A Region Transformed The Fourth Regional Plan

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

TENNESSEE STATE ROUTE 109 CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT ALONG STATE ROUTE 109

5.0 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

1.0 Circulation Element

Harlem Avenue Corridor Plan: Corridor Planning Across Municipal Boundaries

PD&E STUDY SR 9/I-95 FROM SOUTH OF SR 870/COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD TO NORTH OF CYPRESS CREEK ROAD FM # ETDM 14222

OFFICIAL CONTROLS IMPLEMENTATION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

State Highway 121 Southwest Parkway. Fort Worth s Transportation Success Story in Design and Cooperation

Purpose of the Master Plan

Route 1 Corridor Study

This page left intentionally blank.

Overview of Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission s (SPC) 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)

Executive Summary. NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

Benchmark Nonpoint Source Management Approaches In Other States

Purpose of the Master Plan

Transportation in 2030

Transfer of Development Rights

Atlanta BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study. Scoping Meeting August 2008

Street Flooding Mitigation Plan KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission. Presented to AMPO National Conference October 18, 2017

GUIDEBOOK ON LOCAL PLANNING FOR HEALTHY COMMUNITIES (2014)

Making TOD Work in the Heart of Suburban Sprawl

May U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

DISCUSSION TOPIC: ST JOHNS RIVER & ITS TRIBUTARIES (BPII) 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICES AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

NORTH-SOUTH CORRIDOR STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Executive Summary

Transportation Systems and Utility Infrastructure

County Transportation Plan Workshop

Onondaga County Sustainable Streets Project. Onondaga County Planning Federation June 7, Onondaga County Sustainable Streets Project 1

This chapter describes the purpose of the Plan, introduces how the Plan is organized and provides contextual background for the Plan.

PREPARED FOR: PLATTEVIEW ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Welcome to the LYNX Blue Line Extension Transit Station Area Plans Public Workshop No. 3. Presentation will begin at 6:00 P.M.

Walkable Urban Thoroughfares in Illinois Steps for Understanding and Overcoming Barriers

Iowa s Statewide Urban Design Standards Promote Improved Access Management

GAINING LEVERAGE through

A BLUEPRINT FOR BROCKTON A CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Joint Meeting City Council and the Plan Commission. September 1st, 2015

Chapter 2: Vision, Goals and Strategies

Redevelopment of Downtown

JANUARY 19, 2011 CENTRAL AVENUE-METRO BLUE LINE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMMUNITY FORUM

2040 LUP is a part of the Comprehensive Plan and carries the same legal authority. Economic Challenges

Transportation. Strategies for Action

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA AGENDA ITEM

Office of Greenways & Trails Providing Statewide Leadership and Coordination. Southeast Greenways and Trails Summit October 1-3, 2017

Best Practices Appendix: Waterfront Communities

Warren County/Bowling Green Focus 2030 Comprehensive Plan VOLUME 1 INDEX

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

Asset-Based Development Scenario

Transportation Land Use Integration & Regional Planning. Don Kostelec, AICP Senior Planner, Louis Berger Group February 1, 2010

1.0 PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 28, 2017 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

DRAFT Subject to Modifications

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Chapter 1: Introduction

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

IMPLEMENTING SOMERSET COUNTY S INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK

2030 Comprehensive Plan VISION STATEMENT

Ridgefield and the Growth Management Act

South Davis County COMMUNITY SPOTLIGHT

T H A T E V E R Y O N E

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 5H

Presentation Item C Annotated Model Outline for a Framework for a Green Infrastructure Plan

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 TH 14 WEST STUDY AREA Project Description Functional Classification Purpose of the Project

Scope of Services. River Oaks Boulevard (SH 183) Corridor Master Plan

Palm Beach County (University Drive Removal) and Broward County (Transportation Element) Remedial Amendments

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

LAND USE ELEMENT. Purpose. General Goals & Policies

CHAPTER 2 GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES

Branch Avenue Corridor

Huntersville 2030 Community Plan Implementation Schedule

The transportation system in a community is an

Table L-1 Summary Action Strategy. Action Item Timing Status Responsible Agency

6 Growth Management Challenges and Opportunities

Transit / Housing Oriented Redevelopment

The Illinois Department of Transportation and Lake County Division of Transportation. Route 173, including the Millburn Bypass

Gratigny Parkway East Extension Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study

THE GARDEN CITY PLAN. City of St. Catharines Official Plan. City of St. Catharines

Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. Pathways to Urban Sustainability

CENTERS CORRIDORS WEDGES GLOSSARY

Prepared for the Citizens of Forsyth County by the City-County Planning Board

Woodburn Comprehensive Plan Growth Management Goals and Policies

Existing Transportation System 5-1

Local Access Management. Brent Sweger, P.E. Division of Planning Kentucky Transportation Cabinet June 2, 2006

Civic Greenway Natural Features Map. Astoria Riverfront Vision Plan The City of Astoria, Oregon December 2009

When Main Street Is a Highway: Addressing Conflicts Between Land Use and Transportation

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 28, 2017 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT-2

Concord Community Reuse Project Goals and Guiding Principles. Overarching Goals (OG)

READING AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY FFY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Section 2 HIGHWAY AND BRIDGE PROJECTS

CHAPTER 2 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )

DOMINION BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN A MODEL FOR CHESAPEAKE S FUTURE

Comprehensive Plan. Faribault, Minnesota. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Claybaugh Preservation Architecture Inc. Howard R. Green Company Bonz/REA

12 February 9, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: WILDLIFE RESPONSE, INC.

Creating Complete Roadway Corridors:

Definitions. Average Daily Traffic Demand (ADT): The actual number or projected number of cars that pass a point in a 24-hour period.

Transcription:

Lesson 3 Planning Roles & Responsibilities 3-1

Learning Outcomes Identify and describe transportation and land use planning processes Describe the relationships among these processes and how they can be linked Identify the players in transportation and land use planning and development and explain their roles and responsibilities Recognize the legitimacy of politics and the impact political views have on the process 3-2

Overview of Planning Process Land Use Transportation Local Comprehensive Plan Transportation Plan Public Facility Plans Area/ Neighborhood Plans Corridor and Area Plans Functional Plans Zoning/Development Regulations and Guidelines Project Programming Development Review and Permitting Project Development Project Implementation Project Implementation 3-4

Lesson 3: Planning Roles & Responsibilities 3.1 Transportation Planning & Project Development Roles 3.2 Land Use Planning 3.3 Linkages & Coordination Among Processes 3-5

Key Players State departments of transportation (DOTs) Transportation/regional mobility authorities Transit agencies Metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) and regional planning agencies Local jurisdictions Tribal governments U.S. government agencies 3-6

Transportation Planning Process Current Transportation System Monitoring and Evaluation Visioning and Goals Land Use Forecasts Project Solutions Non-Project Solutions Future Needs STIP/TIP Potential Solutions Long-Range Plan 3-7

Major Provisions of Federal Code Mandates transportation planning in urbanized areas and statewide Designates MPO as metropolitan planning agency Identifies planning factors to consider Requires fiscally constrained plans and programs Provides for early and continuous public involvement 3-8

Who Pays for It? Federal funds SAFETEA-LU FHWA (STP, PL, SPR, TCSP, Bridge, Interstate Maintenance, Recreation Trails, etc.) FTA (Section 5303, 5307, 5309, 5311, etc.) State and local match and other discretionary funds State gas tax and/or general funds Sales tax dedication Property tax levy Bonding Development fees Toll, fares and other user fees 3-9

Other Transportation Planning Activities Corridor planning Subarea planning Business district/ activity center Interchange Neighborhood Modal planning Transit Bicycle & pedestrian Water & airports Other topics ITS Freight Highway safety 3-11

Lesson 3: Planning Roles& Responsibilities 3.1 Transportation Planning & Project Development Roles 3.2 Land Use Planning 3.3 Linkages & Coordination Among Processes 3-12

Land Use Control in the U.S. All 50 states have adopted zoning and enabling legislation, relegating land use control to local jurisdictions States vary in how they award planning authority Home-rule provisions State constitutions Legislation Adoption of municipal charters 3-14

Elements of Land Use Planning Comprehensive plan Subarea/neighborhood/ specific plans Zoning ordinance and map Subdivision regulations Design guidelines Parking requirements 3-16

Available Guidance Fourth in a series of transportation/ land use guidebooks produced by PennDOT Publication 688 Training offered 3-17

Available Guidance Pending PennDOT document Publication 622 3-18

Related Municipal Tools Other land use ordinances Adequate public facilities ordinances Transfer of development rights Major thoroughfare plan/official map Sewer and water master plans Capital Improvement Program 3-19

Other Types of Plans Watershed plans Federal land management plans Resource management plans Vermont Division for Historic Preservation Historic districts Center for Watershed Protection and Maryland Department of Natural Resources 3-20

Decision-Makers in Land Use Planning Local governing body holds most power and responsibility Planning commission reviews plans Board of zoning appeals or adjustment grants variances Planning staff review and support 3-21

Other Players Other review boards Design review Historical commission, etc. Other city departments Public works Fire chief School board, etc. The public Property owners and developers Neighbors/abutters Interest groups 3-22

The Developer 3-23

State Involvement Environmentally sensitive areas Major development review Comprehensive plan review, crossacceptance Florida State approval New Jersey State Development and Redevelopment Plan consistency Washington consistency with State growth management policies 3-24

Case Study Interagency Coordination: Blue Ball Properties 3-27

Blue Ball Properties Wilmington, Delaware World headquarters for AstraZenica Delaware Economic Development Office offered over $40 million in grants and tax credits Case Study Department of Natural Resources held nearby land for state park Source: McCormick Taylor, Inc. 3-28

Multi-Agency Effort DelDOT developed $100 million of roadway improvements Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Control held nearby land for state park Case Study Source: McCormick Taylor, Inc. 3-29

Master Plan Improvements to: Transportation Recreation Historic Resources Environmental Resources Case Study Source: McCormick Taylor, Inc. 3-30

Lesson 3: Planning Roles & Responsibilities 3.1 Transportation Planning & Project Development Roles 3.2 Land Use Planning 3.3 Linkages & Coordination Among Processes 3-31

Transportation Planning Process Current Transportation System Monitoring and Evaluation Visioning and Goals Land Use Forecasts Project Solutions Non-Project Solutions Future Needs STIP/TIP Potential Solutions Long-Range Plan 3-32

Transportation Planning Process Land Use Impacts Monitored Current Transportation System Land Use Goals Projects Designed for Land Use Context Monitoring and Evaluation Project Solutions Non-Project Solutions Visioning and Goals Future Needs Land Use Forecasts and Scenarios Land Use Criteria in Project Selection STIP/TIP Land Use Solutions Solutions Potential Solutions Long-Range Plan 3-33

Case Study Regional Planning & Visioning: Charlotte, North Carolina 3-35

Centers and Corridors Plan Case Study Source: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Commission. 3-36

Corridor and Subarea Planning Case Study Source: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Commission 3-37

Comprehensive Planning and Zoning Transit Area Policies Case Study Source: City of Charlotte. 3-39

Roadway and Streetscape Design Case Study Source: City of Charlotte. 3-40

Transit-Oriented Development Case Study Source: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Commission 3-41

Individual Modes Offer Unique Opportunities to Plan 3-42

Overview of Planning Process Land Use Transportation Local Comprehensive Plan Transportation Plan Public Facility Plans Area/ Neighborhood Plans Corridor and Area Plans Functional Plans Zoning/Development Regulations and Guidelines Project Programming Development Review and Permitting Project Development Project Implementation Project Implementation 3-43

Champions For Linking Land Use & Transportation MPO staff, board members State DOT staff City staff planning, public works, etc. Local elected officials and planning boards Citizens/interest groups Developers Other parties 3-44

Additional NHI Training NHI-142043 The CMAQ Program: Purpose & Practice NHI-152069 Metropolitan Transportation Planning 3-45

Additional NTI Training Introduction to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Introduction to Statewide Transportation Planning State and Metropolitan Transportation Programming 3-46

Review List at least four agencies that are responsible for transportation planning, and identify their geographic or functional area of responsibility List at least four key players involved at the local level in land use decisionmaking List at least four processes through which transportation and land use can be coordinated 3-47