North Branch of Cypress Creek Ecological Restoration: A Comprehensive Approach to Stream Restoration

Similar documents
The use of low head weirs to. perennial streams with their floodplains:

When planning stormwater management facilities, the following principles shall be applied where possible.

Public Meeting for the Redevelopment of. July 17,2018 7pm to 9pm Rolling Knolls Elementary School

Severn River Sub-Watershed: BMP 09-Retrofit

Guiding Landowners in Stream Restoration. The Science, Practice & Art of Restoring Native Ecosystems 2015

ST. MARY S SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT (SMSCD) AND DPW&T CONCEPT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES AND CHECKLIST

VA DCR STORMWATER DESIGN SPECIFICATION NO. 11 WET SWALE. VERSION 2.0 January 1, 2013 SECTION 1: DESCRIPTION

Urban Conservation Practice Physical Effects ESTABLISHMENT, GROWTH, AND HARVEST NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

Learning from Nature: Reducing Urban Stormwater Impacts

Old Mill Community Association Bioretention Facility

Draft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

Working Group Meeting

Stream Restoration: Working with Nature?

Stream Restoration: Working with Nature? Greg Jennings, PhD, PE

Post Construction BMPs

Regenerative Stormwater Conveyances: Giving Old, Perched Outfalls New Life APWA NC Stormwater Management Division Conference

Chapter 3 Site Planning and Low Impact Development

Chapter 14. Stormwater Quality Introduction

A. Regional Detention Requirements

Baltimore, MD Lt. Gov. Boyd Rutherford

PAVING PARKING AREAS AND ROADS DESCRIPTION. Alternate Names: Pavement Practices, Impervious Paving

Tentatively Selected Plan within Harlem River, East River and Western Long Island Sound Planning Region. First Level Costs. Federal Non-Federal Total

MANUAL OF DESIGN, INSTALLATION, AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS

Use of Best Management Practices

4.6. Low Impact and Retentive Grading

Department of Agriculture. Conservation Service. United States. Natural Resources REVISED 8/26/16

Stormwater Retrofitting: The Art of Opportunity. Presented by the Center for Watershed Protection

SECTION 5: REACH RECOMMENDATIONS/MAPS

Anne Arundel County s Severn River Watershed Implementation Strategy. Severn River Association

Construction Progress Report

Design Considerations for Open Channel and Detention Pond Design. Howard Redfearn, City of Mansfield

Restoring Floodplain Capacity and Hyporheic Function in an Urban Setting Thornton Confluence and Kingfisher Projects Mike (Rocky) Hrachovec, P.E.

STREAM BANK STABILIZATION THORPS MORTIMER RECREATION AREA Grandfather Ranger District SITE LOCATION & DRAINAGE AREA

Vegetated Filter Strips and Buffers

Big Thompson River Restoration Master Plan. Stakeholder Kick off Meeting and Workshop April 12, 2014

Washington County, Maryland Division of Public Works Policy Manual

DEALING WITH STORM WATER MANAGEMENT

STORMWATER GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND PLANNING/ZONING BOARDS

MINNEHAHA GLEN FEASIBILITY STUDY

5. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS

Bioretention cell schematic key

Lake and Stream Restoration Project

Lesson 2: Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs)

Maryland Association of Floodplain and Stormwater Managers. State of the State - Stormwater Management October 12, 2017

Restoring Water Ecosystems in NYC Parks

APPENDIX E. Flood Plain Management

West Virginia Stormwater Management Manual: Methods.

BASS PONDS, MARSH, & WETLAND HABITAT RESTORATION PROJECT

WQ-23 MOUNTAINOUS AND STEEP SLOPE SITES

DRAFT DESIGN CRITERIA STORMWATER TREATMENT STANDARDS CITY OF OVERLAND PARK

RECONNECTING A COMMUNITY TO THE CREEK

Lincoln 270. City of Lincoln. Stormwater Management Plan. April 2, 2013

SUPPORTING DOCUMENT STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE

City of Waco Stormwater Management Regulations

Guidelines for Streambank Protection

BRISBANE BAYLANDS INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FEBRUARY 2011 APPENDIX O DRAFT

Why a new Food & Farm Ordinance?

The Napa River Flood Protection Project

IMPLEMENTING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT

AWR Engineering, LLC

LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN. APPENDIX G - Stormwater Study Findings & Stormwater Solutions

Checklists. Project Name: Location: File Number: Date of Submittal: Reviewer: Date: Applicant: Contact Name: Phone Number:

Colorado Watershed Protection Fund - Project Grant Application Fountain Creek Restoration Shryver Park Reach Including Shryver Pond

MDOT Stormwater BMPs: The Challenge of Design. Janeen McDermott, PE Dan DeVaun, PE

Rule D Wetland and Creek Buffers

6.5 Lakewood Gulch. Basin Snapshot

C-12. Dry Pond. Design Objective

Vegetated Filter Strips and Buffers

VALLEY VIEW POND Q&A. This item will be discussed under the First Reading portion of the agenda at the July 17, 2012 Village Council meeting.

Pollutant Removal Benefits

CHECKLIST FOR PHASE II DRAINAGE REPORT

Jill Stachura STORMWATER BMP AND STREAM RESTORATION IN A CITY PARK. October 2013 Southeast Stormwater Association Annual Conference, Charlotte, NC

The Restoration of Reading Creek & Model Stream Buffer Ordinances/ Zoning Regulations for Alabama Streams

Appendix I. Checklists

Tale of Two Cities: Exploring How Two Communities are Using Green Infrastructure to Reduce Flood Risk

Urban Stormwater Management. Rebecca Leonardson Rui Teles Brooke Ray Smith

KENT COUNTY STORMWATER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT STORMWATER BMPs MAINTENANCE TASKS AND RESPONSIBILITIES GUIDANCE DOCUMENT BIO-RETENTION FACILITIES

Alternatives Analysis Summary Memorandum

Northern Branch Corridor DEIS December 2011

WET PONDS INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST

Appendices: Glossary. General Terms. Specific Terms. Low Impact Development Approaches Handbook

Level 1 Downstream Analysis

Caledon Villas Corp. c/o Mr. John Spina 55 Blue Willow Drive Woodbridge, ON L4L 9E8 May 14, Floodplain Characteristics, Old Church Road

Chapter 4 - Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans

Stormwater BMP and Stream Restoration in a City Park. Jeff Herr P.E., D.WRE Jill Stachura

Stormwater Management Techniques WMPF LAND USE TRAINING INSTITUTE MARCH 14, 2018

Banking on Natural Fibers Products made from coir and jute play a key role in stabilizing a restored stream for a commercial stream mitigation bank.

7.0 SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

A: Downtown Diversion Pipe

ATTACHMENT 1 WILSON MINE LECROY AREA SEMIPERMANENT DEWATERING SYSTEM

Rainwater Management an issue for the 21 st Century. Hydrological Cycle

Storm Water Quality and Shoreline Restoration Improvements - Grant Funding Request City of Mound Carlson Park Bolton & Menk Project No.

RAIN GARDEN ILLINOIS URBAN MANUAL PRACTICE STANDARD. (feet) CODE 897 DEFINITION

The Flow. Green Infrastructure Taking Root in Cities 3/23/2015. Green Infrastructure Evolution City Plans/Projects Measureable and Holistic Benefits

County Council Of Howard County, Maryland

Executive Committee Meeting Addendum. #7/15 July 3, :30 A.M. HEAD OFFICE, 101 EXCHANGE AVENUE, VAUGHAN Members:

Article 20 Stormwater Management

URBANIZED STREAM CORRIDOR: COMMUNITY APPROACH TO ADDRESS EROSION

Using the Past to Understand the Present Emerging Lessons for Environmental Planning in the Santa Clara Valley

Development and Design of Cost-Effective, Real-Time Implementable Sediment and Contaminant Release Controls

Transcription:

North Branch of Cypress Creek Ecological Restoration: A Comprehensive Approach to Stream Restoration Rocky Powell Clear Creeks Consulting, LLC Keith D. Tate, P.E. BayLand Consultants & Designers, Inc. Mid-Atlantic Stream Restoration Conference October 31, 2013 Consultants & Designers, Inc. Integrating Engineering and Environment 1321 Mercedes Drive, Suite A Phone: (410) 694-9401 Hanover, Maryland 21076 Fax: (410) 694-9405

Project Location

Project Location - Severna Park, MD Anne Arundel County 9 Acre Restoration Site

Primary Design Constraints Highly impervious watershed with altered hydrology. Limited stormwater management. Highly efficient conveyance system stormwater pipes and concrete channels.

Watershed - 40% Impervious 475 Acre Watershed

Primary Design Constraints A series of on-line ponds were constructed in the 1930s. 1960 s urbanization increased sediment loadings to the creek causing sedimentation of the ponds. The resulting down-valley floodplain elevations varied significantly from one impoundment area to the next. Pond embankments breached in the1970s stream downcut through the pond deposits. By the 1990s, the creek was deeply incised, with active head-cuts and severe bank erosion.

Ponds 1943

Pond sedimentation, drastic floodplain elevation changes, dams breach, channel incision, bank erosion and filling of tidal creek

Headwater Wetland Design Approach Reduce peak discharge runoff rate for the 1- and 2-year storm flows. Provide water quality management for the first flush of pollutants. Three design alternatives were evaluated. The selected alternative 2.1 acre-feet stormwater wetland.

Headwater Wetland Peak Discharges for Design Storms 1-Year 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year Inflow (cfs) 93.8 142.1 334.1 588.4 Outflow (cfs) 57.7 107.8 322.2 586.9 Attenuation 38% 24% 4% 0.2%

Upper Reach Step-Pool Channel Design Approach Channel design in this area had to accommodate the narrow valley and steep slope. Accomplished by constructing the upper reach as a B2 channel with a series of log/boulder step pools. Construction of this reach required that the floodplain along the reconstructed channel be raised as well.

Upper Reach E3 Channel Design Approach Floodplain widens and valley gradient flattens downstream of the step pool reach. A short transition E3 channel was constructed. This was accomplished by raising the existing streambed and stabilizing the stream banks.

Anastomosed Reach Design Approach Area of old impoundment. Remnants of old dam in place. Reconstructed as anastomosed or DA channel - multiple channels and stable islands. Primary channel in anastomosed system existing channel. Secondary channels excavated along existing forested floodplain. Trees preserved on islands. Streambed along primary channel raised to reconnect the floodplain. Stream banks stabilized.

Anastomosed Reach Design Approach Minimal sediment supply (Headwater Wetland). Maximum stream power and shear stress consistent with reference reach and research literature. Low gradient Wide floodplain

Floodplain Wetlands Design Approach General The middle reaches along the mainstem were excavated/filled to create floodplain wetlands. Multiple floodplain wetland impoundments provided a method for transitioning from one old floodplain level to the next. Shallow Wetland and Open Water Impoundment Areas Wetland impoundments maximize water quality treatment of storm flows. Depth = 0.5-1.0 foot in shallow wetland areas Depth = 2.0-3.5 feet in open water areas Sized to maximize water quality volume 2.43 acre-feet

Floodplain Wetlands Design Approach Wetland Embankments Broad landform constructed to impound water in the wetlands. Top elevation 1.0 foot above upstream permanent pool. Embankment width equal to width of existing floodplain to minimize flow velocity and shear stress. Boulder Cascades Water conveyed from one wetland area to the next via boulder armored single thread channel constructed through wetland embankment. Boulder cascade sized to convey 1-year storm all other flows spreading across the entire width of the embankment/floodplain.

Floodplain Wetlands Design Approach Islands and Peninsulas Fine grading established islands, peninsulas, and microtopography. Produced a variety of hydrologic regimes within the wetland areas. Top elevations set at 0.5 to 1.0 foot above permanent pool.

Tidal Channel Reach Design Approach Last floodplain wetland embankment raised crest of outlet several feet above tidal area. Existing alignment maintained. Streambed raised by installing constructed riffles. Provided a gradual transition from crest of embankment to tidal area. Reconnected the tidal channel to its floodplain. Provides fish passage from tidal area into floodplain wetland impoundments.

Tributaries and Stormwater Design Approach Drainages Addressed storm flow from outfalls along perimeter of project and along tributaries. Provided water quality treatment and conveyed in a non-erosive manner. Utilized Regenerative Step-pool design.

Environmental Benefits Restored 2,750 LF of mainstem and 880 LF of tributaries Water Quality Volume 5.6 acre-feet 60 acres of Equivalent Impervious Treatment Reduction in sediment and nutrient loadings Created/Restored 7.4 acres of wetlands with a net gain of 3.3 acres including: In-line headwater wetland Forested wetlands Emergent wetlands Tidal wetlands Seepage wetlands Creation of 4.5 acre riparian forest In-stream and riparian habitat enhanced/diversified

Construction Cost $1.7 million