AUDITORY SYSTEMS LABORATORY HEARING PROTECTION DEVICE ATTENUATION TEST REPORT

Similar documents
Sound Performance Rating of Outdoor Unitary Equipment

LAB ID and/or LABORATORY NAME: ASSESSOR NAME: ALPHA TRACK. Method Number: ELAP method number SOP Number: Revision Number: SOP Date:

PRODUCT NUMBER: Leightning L0Ns Neckband Earmuff

S TAR-ORION S OUTH D IAMOND P ROJECT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT S TATEMENT APPENDIX A FUNDAMENTALS OF ACOUSTICS

Sound Performance Rating of Non-ducted Indoor Airconditioning

Acoustical Test Methods and Sound Power Rating Procedures for Transport Refrigeration Equipment

Effects of hearing protection on detection and reaction thresholds for reverse alarms

Chalk, Cheese, Fish and Fowl: Comparing noise criteria - A Northbridge example. Peter Popoff-Asotoff

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

LAB ID and/or LABORATORY NAME: ASSESSOR NAME: ELECTRET by Voltametry. Method Number: ELAP method number SOP Number: Revision Number: SOP Date:

PRODUCT NUMBER: Leightning L3s Headband Earmuff

Refrigerating Appliance DOE Test Report

PRODUCT PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Report No.: D Test Date: May 29, Rendered to: Natural Light Energy Systems Phoenix, Arizona

SIGMADEK, LTD. FIRE TEST REPORT

Room Acoustics, PA Systems and Speech Intelligibility for Voice Alarm Systems using the example of the Cruise Center Steinwerder

CHARCOAL CANISTER (Activated Charcoal Adsorption Device) by Proportional Counting

RF TEST REPORT. ZTE Corporation SRQ-VFD510 ZTE LTE/WCDMA/GSM GPRS RXC RF07

Sunlight Supply, Inc.

John Jay College of Criminal Justice HOT WORK PERMIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

FABRITRAK SYSTEMS, INC. FIRE TEST REPORT

BURNING BRAND PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: VELUX AMERICA, INC. SERIES/MODEL: TGF/TGR (Acrylic Dome) VELUX SUN TUNNEL

REPORT 3933 US ROUTE 11 CORTLAND, NEW YORK 13045

draft dated 9/17/2015 page 1

TEST REPORT. Report No.: D Rendered to: 3M COMPANY St. Paul, Minnesota

USER APPROVAL OF SAFETY INSTRUMENTED SYSTEM DEVICES

1 Introduction - The rating level. 3 Subjective or objective analysis? 2 Determination of the adjustment for annoying tones

Test Report. Appliance EMF Testing

INTRODUCTION. Page 1 of 5

Vibration tests on a TNAML Luminaire

Performance Rating of Heat Pump Pool Heaters

Emergency Vehicle Auditory Warning Signals: Physical and Psychoacoustic Considerations

Updates to Section 608 ODS Management Program

Report No 288/ Part 1 of 2 This report consists of 22 pages. Maxitone ZAMT Type A Addressable Sounder. See Assessment Summary for details

Access Controls for High Radiation Areas NISP-RP-05

Acoustics in open-plan offices A laboratory study

AcoustiFlo Fans: Retrofit Solutions and Beyond

Performance Rating of Heat Pump Pool Heaters

Declaration of Conformity

Report Number BTC 15450A

HALON FLIGHTLINE EXTINGUISHER EVALUATION: DATA SUPPORTING STANDARD DEVELOPMENT [INCLUDES NOVEMBER 2007 ADDENDUM]

GLOSSARY OF ACOUSTICAL TERMS

PRODUCT NUMBER: Viking V1 Multiple-Position Earmuff

Flow Capacity Rating of Suction Line Filters and Suction Line Filter Driers

Evaluation of the Red Jacket Fx1, Fx2, Fx1V and Fx2V Line Leak Detectors For Hourly Monitoring on Rigid Pipelines. Final Report

TEST REPORT. Report No.: E Test Date: May 6, Rendered to: FUNDERMAX GMBH A-9300 St. Veit an der Glan, Austria

Performance Rating of Unit Ventilators

This document is a preview generated by EVS

MINIMUM PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT FOR AIR FORCE FLIGHTLINE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS:

NFPA Changes

Ultrasonic Clamp-On Flow Meter Testing

11:00 to 12:00 Secrets to achieving code-compliant strobe installations. Ralph Coco, Potter Canada Paul Jewett, Mircom Group of Companies

FUNDERMAX GMBH FIRE TEST REPORT

Addressing Sound Masking Requirements in the National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code and UL Standards

PRODUCT NUMBER: Thunder T3s Headband Earmuff

Wayside horn noise investigation

Standard ECMA th Edition - December Declared Noise Emission Values of Information Technology and Telecommunications Equipment

Evaluation of the Incon TS-LLD Line Leak Detection System

The attached report presents the results of the observations and monitoring performed on April 10, 11, and 19, 2018 by Devin Porter of ATC.

THEORETICAL EQUILIBRIUM MOISTURE CONTENT OF WOOD UNDER VACUUM Zhangjing Chen? Fred M. Lamb1

REPORT COMMERCENTRE DRIVE, LAKE FOREST, CA 92630

REPORT 3933 US ROUTE 11, CORTLAND, NEW YORK 13045

PRODUCT NUMBER: AirSoft (Red Vinyl Cord)

POWERING SURROUND SPEAKERS

PCT Workshop Before you leave the office

KWA. Evaluation of the Morrison Bros. Co. Liquid Sensor, Adjustable Level Sensor and Multi-Level Sensor. Final Report

SLIP RESISTANCE TESTING OF ENDURO-MESH PANEL

Virginia TrueAllele Validation Study: Casework Comparison. One person, one genotype. DNA data. Cybergenetics

TECHNICAL GUIDE. Description SPLIT-SYSTEM AIR-COOLED CONDENSING UNITS YD360, 480 & THRU 50 NOMINAL TONS YTG-B-0811

Classification of Fire Performance of Wall and Ceiling Lining Materials

QATAR STANDARD QS SASO 2692/201 QS SASO 2692 ENERGY LABELLING REQUIREMENTS OF HOUSEHOLD ELECTRICAL CLOTHES WASHING MACHINES

ANSI/AHRI Standard 911 (SI) 2014 Standard for Performance Rating of Indoor Pool Dehumidifiers

Feniex Hammer S Distributed By: Feniex Hammer Instruction Manual / feniex.com

Brief Synopsis of the Japanese MOE Sponsored Evaluation of Wind Turbine Noise

Fairfax County Parkway (Route 286) Widening Project

THE EFFECT OF BUILDING CODES AND HOUSE AGE ON RADON CONCENTRATIONS IN MINNESOTA

MARTIN Insertable Dust Collector

PRODUCT NUMBER: Quiet (Corded) Easy handling and better fit

ASBESTOS ROOF INSPECTION REPORT

REPORT COMMERCENTRE DRIVE, LAKE FOREST, CA 92630

VERIFICATION OF FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS

PRODUCT NUMBER: Bilsom AM/FM Radio Hi-Vis Earmuff

505 Petaluma Boulevard South Petaluma, California Tel: Fax:

Fan Arrays. White Paper. Energy Labs White Paper Series Volume 0412 Issue 001 April 2012 Rev. 0. Series

Refrigerated Cylinder Testing Procedures

OHIO UNIVERSITY RADIATION SAFETY REVIEW

Susan Wakil Health Building. Noise and Vibration Monitoring Report 26 September 24 November S180787RP1 Revision 0 Monday, 17 December 2018

Submittal Data PERFORMANCE DATA CERTIFIED DIMENSION PRINTS CERTIFIED ROOF CURB DIMENSION PRINTS SERVICE OPTION DIMENSION PRINTS

F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S

Identification of Aberrant Railroad Wayside WILD and THD Detectors: Using Industry-wide Railroad Data. June 10, 2014

Refrigerating Appliance ErP Test Report

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: SOLATUBE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

FAN WALL Technology. Product

Sound Pressure Level Test Report Report No. : PH2_09_ Date : 2009/6/30

AFMG. Design for Speech Intelligibility Using Software Modeling. Stefan Feistel, Bruce C. Olson AHNERT FEISTEL MEDIA GROUP

FORM ACCL-PC1 ACCL WITNESS TEST PROCEDURE AND CHECKLIST

ETSI TS V1.2.1 ( )

TEST REPORT IEC Safety of household and similar electrical appliances Part 2: Particular requirements for massage appliance

Australian/New Zealand Standard

MPE TEST REPORT 2APNR-GW631Q R1805A0254-M1V1

Transcription:

AUDITORY SYSTEMS LABORATORY HEARING PROTECTION DEVICE ATTENUATION TEST REPORT! AUDITORY SYSTEMS LABORATORY GRADO DEPT. OF INDUSTRIAL & SYSTEMS ENGINEERING Dr. John G. Casali, Professor and Director COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING Office Phone: (540) 231-5073 VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY Facsimile: (540) 231-3322 Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 WWW: http://www.casali.org.vt.edu/audio_lab.pdf Test Report Date: July 2, 2014 Client: Alvin Halfaker 20134 Bluebird Drive Grand Rapids, MN 55744 Test Report Number: VTEA-7/2/14-1HP-M The client may not use this report to claim product endorsement by Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech). This report may be reproduced only in its entirety. It may not be reprinted for use in advertising copy. Copyright by Auditory Systems Laboratory, Virginia Tech (John G. Casali), 2014. All rights reserved.

Page 1 of 4 VIRGINIA TECH AUDITORY SYSTEMS LABORATORY HEARING PROTECTOR ATTENUATION TEST REPORT* HEARING PROTECTOR: Quiet Ride Helmet motocross helmet model PROTECTOR TYPE: earmuff for inside motocross helmet MANUFACTURER: Quiet Ride Helmet, Inc TEST DATE: 06/16/14 07/02/14 TEST STANDARD USED: ANSI S3.19-1974 FITTING METHOD: Experimenter Fit 5 NO. OF SAMPLES TESTED: 1 helmet NO. & SEX OF SUBJECTS TESTED: 6 M, 4 F SUBJECT AGE RANGE/MEAN: 20-42 yrs; 30.3 yrs HEADBAND FORCE: N/A TEST POSITION: N/A COMMENTS: Earmuffs were tested inside a motocross helmet model from Quiet Ride Helmet, Inc. Earmuffs were mounted with velcro, and an air bladder between the muff's earcups and the helmet was inflated using a pressure bulb to obtain a "best-appearing" fit. These procedures and helmet were as per manufacturer's instructions. Attenuation presented herein are valid only for the aforementioned helmet and earmuff system. TESTER: Kichol Lee 7/2/14 Name Signature Date APPROVED John G. Casali 7/2/14 SIGNATORY: Name Signature Date NOISE-REDUCTION RATING (NRR) (per NIOSH, http://www2a.cdc.gov/hp-devices/usehpdc.html): 17 (calculations on page 3) ATTENUATION MEANS AND STANDARD DEVIATIONS (from 30 trials) 1/3 octave band center (Hz) 125 250 500 1000 2000 3150 4000 6300 8000 mean attenuation (db) 13.9 13.6 20.8 34.2 42.4 46.3 46.0 48.8 48.5 standard deviation (db) 3.2 3.0 4.4 3.9 4.3 3.7 2.7 3.3 4.0 *Test report data relate only to those protector units and subject sample tested. The client may not use this report to claim product endorsement by Virginia Tech. For labeling purposes, only the following statement may be used in regard to testing in the Virginia Tech facility; no other references to the university or to personnel may be used. "These attenuation data were obtained in accordance with ANSI Standard S3.19-1974 in an independent university testing laboratory at Virginia Tech.

Page 2 of 4 VIRGINIA TECH AUDITORY SYSTEMS LABORATORY HEARING PROTECTOR ATTENUATION TEST REPORT PROCEDURES USED a) Test subjects were randomly selected from a pool of qualified listeners maintained by the Auditory Systems Laboratory. All listeners were empirically qualified as per the requirements of ANSI S3.19-1974 1 or ANSI S12.6-1997(R2002) 3, according to the particular standard specified for testing. b) Where ANSI S3.19-1974 1 was the test method, experimenter-fit was used, according to section 3.3.3.1 (2) of the standard, as per EPA (1990) 5 requirements. Where ANSI S12.6-1997(R2002) 3 was the test method, Method A (experimenter-supervised fit in section 8 of the standard) or Method B (subject fit in section 9 of the standard) was used, as requested by the client and as indicated on page 1 of this report. c) Room ambient noise levels were continuously monitored during the tests using a real-time spectrum analyzer to verify that allowable levels of the standards 1,3 were not exceeded during threshold determination. d) The psychophysical procedure used in the tests was Békésy tracking, presented and scored on-line by computer. The scoring criteria programmed on the computer met the requirements of section 11.2 of ANSI S12.6-1997(R2002) 3. Detail concerning the implementation of this psychophysical procedure appears in Casali, Robinson and Hankins (2000a, 2000b) 2,4. e) Where the protector under test was an earmuff or semi-insert device, headband compression force values were obtained from the test samples before attenuation testing commenced. Measurements were arithmetically averaged across the samples and the result (in Newtons, N) reported on page 1 of this report. The measurements were obtained using a Headband Force Rig Model 3.02.B manufactured by INSPEC Laboratories, Ltd, Manchester, England. The force measurements were obtained at a separation of 14.35 cm and a 13.08 cm headband height for tests conducted under S3.19-1974 1 and at a separation of 145 mm and a 130 mm headband height for tests conducted under S12.6-1997(R2002) 3. REFERENCES CITED 1 ANSI S3.19-1974. Method for the measurement of real-ear protection of hearing protectors and physical attenuation of earmuffs. New York, NY: American National Standards Institute, 1974. 2 Casali, J. G., Robinson, G. S. and Hankins, S. E. (2000a). A reverberant computer-controlled facility for hearing protection research and attenuation testing: Verification re ANSI S3.19-1974 (Report No. 20002). Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering. 3 ANSI S12.6-1997(R2002). Methods for the measurement of the real-ear attenuation of hearing protectors. New York, NY: American National Standards Institute, 1997. 4 Casali, J. G., Robinson, G. S. and Hankins, S. E. (2000b). A computer-controlled facility for hearing protection research and attenuation testing: Verification re ANSI S12.6-1997 (Report No. 20003). Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering. 5 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Product noise labeling. Code of Federal Regulations, 40 CFR Part 211, 128-144, July 1, 1990. (Requires ANSI S3.19-1974 and "Experimenter-Fit" protocol of section 3.3.3.1 (2).)

Page 3 of 4 HEARING PROTECTOR: Quiet Ride Helmet motocross helmet NOISE REDUCTION RATING (NRR) CALCULATION (per EPA,1990) 1/3 octave band center (Hz) 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 1. assumed pink 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 noise (db) 2. C-weighting -0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.2-0.8-3.0 corrections (db) 3. unprotected ear 99.8 100.0 100.0 100.0 99.8 99.2 97.0 107.9 Logarithmic C-weighted level (db) Sum 4. A-weighted -16.1-8.6-3.2 0.0 1.2 1.0-1.1 (log base 10) corrections (db) 5. unprotected ear 83.9 91.4 96.8 100.0 101.2 101.0 98.9 A-weighted level (db) (step 1 + step 4) 6. mean attenuation 13.9 13.6 20.8 34.2 42.4 46.2 48.7 at frequency (db)* 7. standard deviation at 6.4 6.0 8.8 7.8 8.6 6.4 7.3 frequency (x2) (db)* 8. protected ear 76.4 83.8 84.8 73.6 67.4 61.2 57.5 87.9 Logarithmic A-weighted sound levels (db) (step 5-step 6+step 7) 9. NRR = (step 3 log sum)-(step 8 log sum)- (3dB correction factor)= 17.0 Sum (log base 10) NRR = 17 Fitting Procedure: Experimenter-Fit All values/calculations in rows 1-5 are from EPA (1990) * 4000 Hz values are mean of 3150 Hz and 4000 Hz data. 8000 Hz values are mean of 6300 Hz and 8000 Hz data FREQUENCY (Hz) 125 250 500 1000 2000 3150 4000 6300 8000 attenuation mean 13.9 13.6 20.8 34.2 42.4 46.3 46.0 48.8 48.5 attenuation std. dev. 3.2 3.0 4.4 3.9 4.3 3.7 2.7 3.3 4.0

Page 4 of 4 HEARING PROTECTOR: Quiet Ride Helmet motocross helmet ATTENUATION DATA (in db) BY TRIAL BY INDIVIDUAL SUBJECT 1/3 octave band center (Hz) subject trial 125 250 500 1000 2000 3150 4000 6300 8000 1 1 15.8 21.5 27.0 37.5 43.2 46.0 45.7 49.5 53.8 1 2 22.3 17.6 23.4 38.0 44.6 50.5 46.0 47.4 53.1 1 3 19.2 18.9 21.0 37.6 45.6 44.4 48.8 51.9 54.0 2 1 13.1 12.3 26.4 38.5 44.6 49.6 43.8 49.9 51.1 2 2 13.8 9.4 21.4 38.9 44.6 44.9 48.3 48.8 51.4 2 3 10.5 16.0 25.2 34.5 41.9 47.7 44.4 48.7 49.4 3 1 12.6 16.6 20.6 33.9 40.2 53.0 48.8 46.5 47.2 3 2 15.4 14.5 19.5 36.3 40.5 50.4 47.5 48.0 47.4 3 3 17.5 14.2 21.6 35.7 41.5 46.5 46.5 48.8 46.9 4 1 11.0 8.5 11.2 26.5 33.3 45.2 43.3 41.9 43.1 4 2 15.7 13.7 17.6 29.1 38.9 51.3 41.1 46.3 43.6 4 3 11.0 11.1 20.9 35.7 42.5 46.5 41.0 44.3 47.1 5 1 10.3 14.6 19.5 33.4 35.7 43.8 49.0 46.8 39.6 5 2 11.3 13.9 16.4 31.1 39.0 40.6 45.1 45.6 44.4 5 3 10.2 9.8 15.1 29.8 37.0 39.3 46.2 48.3 46.0 6 1 8.5 10.1 14.0 32.2 45.1 38.8 41.6 47.9 42.6 6 2 14.8 12.5 17.4 30.6 45.7 39.9 40.9 41.5 41.7 6 3 9.0 14.5 15.2 34.4 39.3 43.0 44.5 43.3 44.4 7 1 14.2 9.6 19.6 32.8 40.1 46.2 45.2 51.6 46.3 7 2 12.4 11.7 15.9 29.9 45.4 51.5 49.1 51.6 46.5 7 3 12.3 13.7 18.1 33.3 42.4 44.3 46.9 54.0 52.1 8 1 14.2 15.6 26.5 36.1 46.4 48.3 47.5 48.1 50.5 8 2 17.5 15.8 26.2 37.7 53.3 48.5 47.1 52.2 52.0 8 3 16.2 16.3 24.9 40.4 52.4 46.1 47.8 51.6 52.9 9 1 17.8 13.0 26.0 33.9 45.9 46.7 45.5 52.6 50.2 9 2 12.1 12.0 22.6 28.5 41.4 46.8 48.3 49.0 50.3 9 3 11.6 10.6 16.3 26.8 37.9 42.7 42.0 49.3 53.4 10 1 14.5 11.5 22.2 38.6 40.9 49.3 47.4 52.4 52.3 10 2 18.2 14.2 25.2 40.2 41.0 49.8 50.1 53.0 50.1 10 3 13.1 13.5 25.7 35.1 41.5 47.8 49.7 53.6 51.6 attenuation mean 13.9 13.6 20.8 34.2 42.4 46.3 46.0 48.8 48.5 attenuation std. dev. 3.2 3.0 4.4 3.9 4.3 3.7 2.7 3.3 4.0