JACKSON PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT

Similar documents
OLD MAIN HISTORIC DISTRICT

Streetscape Patterns. Design Guidelines, Ridgewood Village Center Historic District, Ridgewood, N.J. page 20

Landscape Design Guidelines

BUSINESS DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES

Town Center Design Guidelines

CHAPTER 12 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS

FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist

SUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA

Landscaping And Site Details

Chapter 5: Mixed Use Neighborhood Character District

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM

Analysis of Environs of 1000 New York Street, German Methodist Episcopal Church

8. Guidelines for Landscapes and Streetscapes

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion

The open space system should provide connective elements, relate to natural resources, and enhance the suburban character of the landscape..

Figure Example of out door dining in the public right-of-way.

CENTERS AND CORRIDORS

ZONING. 300 Attachment 1. City of Oneonta. Design Guidelines ( )

VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use

VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION

2.5 Walkways, Driveways, and Offstreet Parking: Guidelines

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

Motor City Re-Store Design Guidelines

FREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

CHAPTER 6 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR INDIVIDUAL BUILDING ELEMENTS. Commercial Facades

Resolution : Exhibit A. Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003

Historic District Commission

Multi family Residential Development Permit Area

Table of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2.

II. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

Landscape and Streetscape Design 2.5

INSTITUTIONAL USE DESIGN COMPATIBILITY TECHNIQUES

SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines

13. New Construction. Context & Character

Design Guidelines. Roosevelt. Mike Podowski DPD Design Guidelines Ordinance ATT 13 August 13, 2012 Version #1

V. Gateways GATEWAYS / V-1

GUIDELINES REPLACEMENT HOUSING GUIDELINES LOCATION INTRODUCTION URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Architectural and Appearance Design Manual. Town of Lexington, SC 1

Design Guidelines Checklist

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Front Yard Terracing PLNHLC South 1200 East Meeting Date: August 7, 2014

Urban Design Brief 1576 Richmond Street City of London

Chapter 4: Jordan Road Character District

CHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses

Site Planning. 1.0 Site Context. 2.0 Pedestrian Circulation Systems. Pag e 2-23

CITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN

Greater East Wenatchee Urban Growth Area. Design Standards & Guidelines

Zoning Code Issues Prioritization

Building and Site Design Standards

MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES Site Plan and Design Review Principles Checklist

City of Bellingham. Multifamily Residential Design Handbook

Wayfinding. North Gateway: Integrate a vertical gateway marker on the west side of Ward Street at the south corner of Vernon Street.

Design Guidelines for the Route 30 Corridor Master Plan: Subdivision and Land Development Elements

R STREET CORRIDOR NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Supplemental Guidelines Checklist

Residential Design Guidelines

City of Redlands Architectural Guidelines for Non-Residential Development

The George Washington University Streetscape Concept Plan. May 6 th 2009 Public Presentation for Discussion EHRENKRANTZ ECKSTUT & KUHN ARCHITECTS

BUILDING SCALE AND SETBACKS 5 ELEMENTS:... 5 FAÇADES (COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL) 5

The Vision. Photo provided by The Minervini Group. 46 Vision, Objectives & Strategies

BYLAW TOWN OF BLACK DIAMOND

TOWN CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CITY OF. August, MOUNTLAKE TERRACE TOWN CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS August,

Mixed Use Centres Development Permit Guidelines

5.1.1 The streetscape along US Highway 64 (Brevard Road); and, The built environment within new residential developments; and,

Corridor Identity. Section 9. Introduction. Corridor Guiding Principles

Carlsbad Village Redevelopment Concept Summary of Features

Community Design Plan

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF REPORT

Appendix A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Fences STANDARDS Illustration #12

Cha p t e r 2: Ge n e r a l De s i g n Gu i d e l i n e s

City of Aurora Planning Department DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL DISPENSING STATION. August 3, 1998

180 ZONING 180. ARTICLE XLII STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENT OVERLAY ( SEO ) DISTRICT [Added Ord. No. 1086]

Commercial Development Permit Area

REZONING APPLICATION MPD SUPPLEMENT

PROJECT SITE The Proposed Project includes the Allen and Pike Street malls between Delancey and South Streets (see Figure 2C-1).

Design Guidelines for PRINCESS ANNE COMMONS

5.1 Site Plan Guidelines

Clairtrell Area Context Plan

AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK

Regency Developments. Urban Design Brief. Holyrood DC2 Rezoning

Chapter 7: Streetscape & Design Elements

Community Design Guidelines. Port Wallace DRAFT

Othello Neighborhood Design Guidelines

Buildings may be set back to create small plazas provided that these setbacks do not substantially disrupt the street wall s continuity.

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES

FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project

Highland Village Green Design Guidelines

Chapter 14 Streetscape Improvements

Architectural Style. The utilization of forms from any of the following traditional styles are acceptable: Craftsman Prairie French Country

Fifth and Detroit Street Design May 2017 Capital Improvements Committee. DOWNTOWN Street Design

Broadway Avenue Streetscape Project City of Albert Lea. Streetscape Design Committee Meeting October 29, 2012

RESIDENTIAL GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

Design Guidelines for Residential Subdivisions

Chapter PEDESTRIAN COMMERCIAL (PC) ZONING DISTRICT

SECTION 24 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR LARGE COMMERCIAL AND RETAIL DEVELOPMENTS INTRODUCTION & PROCEDURE 24-2

D. Landscape Design. 1. Coverage Intent: To provide adequate landscaping materials that enhance the appearance of development projects.

The Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN

4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon

Transcription:

JACKSON PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT

SETTING AND SITE SETTING The building setting is the area or environment in which an historic property is found. It may be an urban or suburban neighborhood or a natural landscape in which a building has been constructed. The elements of setting, such as the relationship of buildings to one another, property setbacks, fence patterns, views, driveways and walkways, together with street trees and other landscaping features create the specific character of a neighborhood or district. Historic photograph at 11 th Street between Bluff and Locust. The character of this area is defined by large homes on corner lots, combined with urban features such as uniform setbacks, higher density of development, concrete sidewalks, and mature street trees in the right-of way. JP-1 Identify, retain and preserve landscape features that are important in defining the historic character of the setting, such as roads and streets, furnishings and fixtures, natural or topographic features, and key views or vistas. Retain historic relationship between buildings, between buildings and streets, and between buildings and landscape features. Evaluate condition and integrity of existing landscape and streetscape features. Devise plans for repair, maintenance, and long-term protection of these features. ACCEPTABLE Removal and replacement of existing historic features with substitute materials that simulate the original in appearance, when replacement inkind is not economically feasible.* Removal and replacement of existing historic features with new or common materials, when it is not economically viable to save and repair originals or to use substitute materials that simulate the original in appearance.* NOT Removal, relocation, or radical alteration of any streetscape or landscape element that contributes to the historic character of the district. Failing to maintain the historic relationship of buildings and setting features through inappropriate new construction of streets, parking lots, or building infill. Permitting damage or deterioration of existing features through inadequate protection or maintenance. Removal and replacement of existing historic features with new materials, when it is economically feasible to save and repair originals. *Review with PSD and HPC

SETTING JP-2 Greenspaces are highly visible features in some districts. In this photo from 1878, Jackson Park has just been transformed from a graveyard to a public park.the landscaping, paths, and fencing is in place, although the central oriental gazebo is under construction. District is notable for its more urban character, as defined by the mix of commercial, public and residential uses, as well as the higher density of development, resulting in residential version of the streetwall. These features can be seen in both the historic (left) and contemporary (right) photos of the west side of Main Street.

SETTING NOT A combination of insensitive urban renewal, road construction, and deferred maintenance have taken their toll on the once dense residential and commercial areas in downtown. Having lost their historic context, the surviving structures do not relate well to their new surroundings, and seem out of place. JP-3 Contemporary parking lots in the district generally signify the loss of structures that contributed to the overall setting and character of the area. The resulting gaps in the historic fabric have a negative visual impact, as in the case of the imposing Greystone, seen at right, which once dominated its block at the bluff base. It is now the site of a large parking lot (at left).

SETTING AND SITE SITE The landscape surrounding a historic building and contained within an individual parcel of land is considered the building site. The site, including all of its associated features, contributes to the overall character of the property. As a result, the relationship between the building and the landscape features within the site s boundaries should be considered in the overall planning of rehabilitation work. JP-4 Identify, retain and preserve landscape features that are important in defining the historic character of the site, such as sidewalks and paths, furnishings, light fixtures, sculpture, and water features, natural or topographic features, and potential archaeological resources. Retain historic relationship between buildings and secondary structures, between buildings and streets, and between buildings and landscape features. Evaluate condition and integrity of existing buildings and landscape features. Devise plans for repair, maintenance, and long-term protection of these features. NOT Removal, relocation, or radical alteration of any building or landscape element that contributes to the historic character of the site. Failing to maintain the historic relationship of buildings and landscape features through inappropriate new construction of streets, pathways, parking lots, secondary buildings, or building infill. Permitting damage or deterioration of existing features through inadequate protection or maintenance. Historic photograph of house on Locust Street showing relationship of the structure to its site. Notable features include the setback of the property on its site, a limestone retaining wall capped with iron fencing, street trees in the right-of-way, gas lighting, and mature landscaping. Removal and replacement of existing historic features with new materials, when originals can be saved and repaired.

SITE The relationship of the building façade to its lot, to the street and the sidewalk, and to its neighbors helps define the nature of the building site. The two photos on the right show large freestanding homes on large lots, which is common in this district. The fences, low plantings, retaining walls, and large scale landscaping all contribute to the character of the site. JP-5 NOT The photo on the left is an example of a site that has been altered in a way that is incompatible with the surrounding sites in the neighborhood. It is an insensitive use of limestone in a historic district, especially in this residential setting. Appropriate vegetation has been recently restored, as seen in the photo on the right.

*Review with PSD and HPC STREETSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES DRIVEWAYS, PARKING, PAVING - RESIDENTIAL The majority of the areas contained within the historic districts were platted in a period that relied on pedestrian, trolley, and carriage traffic as the primary means of transportation. Streets were narrow and paved with planks, and later with pavers, if they were paved at all. In the more urban areas of, Old Main, and Cathedral districts, housing patterns were dense, and rear alleys provided access to sheds, carriage houses, or garages at the back or side of the property. With the coming of the automobile, these structures were increasingly converted to or replaced by garages. The insertion of driveways, parking areas, and curb cuts in these districts is generally inconsistent with their historic character. Within the districts the traditional paving materials should be saved and restored. The insertion of new curb cuts and parking both garages and driveways should be kept to a minimum. Preservation of driveways and their original designs, materials, and placements. Materials for new drives that are consistent with the historic materials, including crushed-limestone aggregate concrete and brick pavers. Parking areas located near the rear of the property, and screened with landscaping when visible from the street. Preservation and renovation of historic secondary structures for continued use. Access to garages from side or rear of property. ACCEPTABLE Substitute materials that simulate the original in appearance, such as tinted asphalt and stained and/or stamped concrete, or common materials such a plain asphalt.* As a last resort, new or common materials, such as standard concrete, when it is not economically viable to save and repair originals or to use substitute materials which simulate the original in appearance.* NOT Insertion of new semi-circular or drive-thru drive designs in front yards. Demolition of an existing secondary structure for the creation of a new garage. Insertion of a new drive or garage adjacent to or in front of the primary façade of the primary structure. Insertion of gravel or dirt drives, which violates City codes. JP-6 Insertion of new drives or parking areas without provision of proper landscape screening from the street(s).

DRIVES, PARKING LOTS, PAVING - COMMERCIAL The majority of the areas contained within the historic districts were platted in a period that relied largely on pedestrian, trolley, and carriage traffic as the primary means of transportation. Streets originally were paved with planks, and later with pavers, if they were paved at all. In the downtown areas of Old Main, West 11 th Street,, and portions of the Cathedral districts, construction patterns were dense, and rear alleys provided access to the back of the property. The insertion of prominent driveways, curb cuts, and parking lots in these areas of the district is generally inconsistent with their historic character. Within the districts the traditional paving and materials should be saved and restored, and the insertion of new curb cuts and parking kept to a minimum. JP-7 Location of new parking lots for commercially-used houses, churches, apartments, schools in the rear of the properties. Screening parking areas at corner lots with landscaping on both streets. Aligning new parking areas on vacant lots with the front edge of the adjacent property to allow for a proper landscaping screen. Preservation and renovation of historic secondary structures for continued use. Access for delivery from the side or rear of property. Preservation and repair of brick paving where existing. ACCEPTABLE Substitute materials that simulate the original in appearance, such as tinted asphalt and stained and/or stamped concrete, or common materials such a plain asphalt.* As a last resort, new or common materials, such as standard concrete, when it is not economically viable to save and repair originals or to use substitute materials which simulate the original in appearance.* NOT Demolition of an existing primary or secondary structure for the creation of parking areas. Insertion of a new drive or garage adjacent to or in front of the primary façade of the primary structure. Insertion of new drives or parking areas without provision of proper landscape screening from street. *Review with PSD and HPC

DRIVEWAYS, PARKING LOTS, PAVING JP-8 Public parking with an adequate setback, decorative fencing, and appropriate plantings for screening. NOT Historic brick street. This area was recently repaired and the pavers were retained. Contemporary parking lots (at left) in the districts create gaps in the historic architectural fabric that have a negative visual impact on the district as a whole. At left the parking lot is prominently located at a corner, it does not respect the setback of the neighboring building, and there is little to blend it into its surrounding or hide it from pubic view with the fencing or landscaping. At right, the large open space of the parking lot interrupts the architectural row. The density necessitates on-street or alley parking for both commercial and residential structures. Garages are accessed from the rear alley.

SIDEWALKS, WALKWAYS, AND CURBS Sidewalks throughout the Cathedral District were either wood plank in their earliest form, which was later replaced with brick pavers in different patterns, or poured concrete with a crushed limestone aggregate. It is currently City policy to remove and replace these materials during new construction, either with broom finish poured concrete or, more recently, stained concrete pavers or stained and stamped concrete. Preservation and replication of any of the historic masonry materials for sidewalks would be appropriate in the District and adjacent neighborhoods, and is the recommended treatment. Substitute materials can be considered for issues of cost and code compliance, however. Limestone was the traditional curb material throughout the city. As with the sidewalks, it has been City policy to remove and replace these curbs with poured concrete curbs and gutters as they deteriorate, or when they interfere with street or utility repairs. Limestone is recommended for use as a straight curb material in these areas due to its historic presence, but alternate materials may be considered for ease of maintenance, reduced cost and increased durability. Identification and preservation of original historic paving and limestone curbing materials where they survive, particularly in areas where the curbing has a substantial visual impact on the view from the street. Materials for new sidewalks and crosswalks that are consistent with the historic materials, such as brick pavers and crushed-limestone aggregate concrete. Replacement of deteriorated limestone curbs with new limestone. New sidewalks that restore the historic width of the walkways, where contemporary usages and City codes allow. ACCEPTABLE Substitute materials that simulate the original paving, such as colored concrete pavers and stamped and/or stained concrete.* Substitute materials that simulate the original limestone curbing in color, texture, and shape, such as straight curbs of tinted concrete poured with a textured form liner.* As a last resort, new or common materials, such as standard concrete, when it is not economically viable to save and repair originals or to use substitute materials which simulate the original in appearance.* NOT Removal of historic curbs and gutters without an appropriate replacement. Use of pebble-surface concrete sidewalks. Use of asphalt for a paving material on sidewalks. JP-9 *Review with PSD and HPC

SIDEWALKS, WALKWAYS, AND CURBS JP-10 Limestone curbs in historic (left) and contemporary (right) photos. These survive rather sporadically due to the City s replacement policy. They should be maintained whenever possible. ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATES Three types and patterns of brick sidewalk paving and limestone aggregate concrete (foreground) Concrete pavers Stamped concrete

GRADE CHANGES AND RETAINING WALLS Any addition or removal of ground material on the property is considered to be a change in grade. As a general rule this should be avoided. Such changes generally result in the alteration of the visual character of the property, and also may damage the site and its structures through erosion or improper drainage. Every residential historic district exhibited some form of retaining wall constructed from large, rough-hewn blocks of the local limestone. These retaining walls are characteristic of Dubuque, and the massive examples seen in the Cathedral,, and West 11 th Street districts represent one of the city s most distinctive features. Smaller scale versions are common for individual properties, and groups of properties, throughout the districts. As with the curbs and gutters, limestone retaining walls have been replaced in some areas with new poured concrete versions. The historic walls should be retained and repaired where they exist, and new walls should be built with the same finish materials as the historic walls. GRADE CHANGES JP-11 Minor changes in grade that will improve drainage of a site, or that will serve to direct moisture away from a structure. Minor changes in grade for the purpose of site or landscape improvements or restoration. GRADE CHANGES NOT Changes in grade that obscure or conceal portions of the primary structure. Changes in grade that may have an adverse effect on the site s structures, or neighboring structures through the redirection of moisture or storm water. Changes in grade that have an impact on the character of the streetscape or the relationship of the buildings to their sites. RETAINING WALLS Identifying and preserving historic limestone retaining walls. Constructing new retaining walls that replicate the size, scale, and materials of the historic limestone walls. RETAINING WALLS ACCEPTABLE As a last resort, new or common materials, such as standard concrete, when it is not economically viable to save and repair originals or to use substitute materials which simulate the original in appearance.* RETAINING WALLS NOT Damaging or removing an historic retaining wall that can be salvaged or repaired. Constructing new retaining walls of poured concrete, railroad ties, or standard concrete block. *Review with PSD and HPC

GRADE CHANGES AND RETAINING WALLS JP-12 Historic limestone retaining walls. Such walls are common in Dubuque, and define its character. Every effort should be made to preserve them. A new retaining wall on Bluff street recalls the construction of historic examples. NOT Large poured concrete retaining wall is incompatible in its form, materials, and finish Railroad tie retaining walls are not appropriate Substitute materials (left of stair) do not match the color, texture, and scale of the original limestone wall (right of stair)

FENCES AND GATES Every residential area of the historic districts exhibited some form of low historic fences and/or gate. The high density of the residential areas combined with the complexities of the local topography limited fences primarily to large, flat plots, usually those of the larger upper class homes. Elaborate wrought and cast iron examples were common on the larger properties constructed in the latter half of the nineteenth century in the, West 11 th Street, and Cathedral districts. These were often erected atop a limestone retaining wall that served as a base, and several examples survive in good condition. More utilitarian mesh-type fences precursors to modern chain link also are visible in these areas, although they survive less frequently. In the Langworthy and southern Cathedral districts simple wooden picket fencing and gates, and wooden balustrade style fences were a popular choice for larger homes or groups of properties. After 1945 chain link became a popular fencing option, but this material is incompatible with the historic character of the districts. Original fences should be preserved and repaired where they exist, and new fences should be based upon historic prototypes whenever possible. JP-13 Identification and preservation of original cast and wrought iron fences and gates. Replication and installation of new fences based upon identified historic prototypes. Replication and installation of different types of historic fences for different exposures, based upon identified prototypes. New fences that are sensitive to historic precedents in their scale, transparency, color, and materials. Fences that are in compliance with City codes. Installation of privacy fences at the rear of the property only. Removal of inappropriate chain link or privacy fences. Installation of the same appropriate material for fences wherever they occur on the property, unless different historic materials are extant. Installation of fences with the decorative face presented to the public way. Planting of windbreaks or hedgerows to function as a privacy fence on primary facades, where adequate historic documentation exists. NOT New fences constructed of chain link, horizontal board, split rails, plastic, concrete block or other solid masonry. Fences that are not in compliance with City codes. Privacy fences that are set forward of the rear wall of the structure, or that are prominently visible from the street(s).

FENCES AND GATES - Wood JP-14 NOT

FENCES AND GATES - Metal JP-15 NOT

AMENITIES - RESIDENTIAL A variety of amenities are required in public areas for the convenience of all. Historically these would include items such as benches or other forms of seating, clocks, hitching posts, and street signs. Due to intensive usage and constant exposure to the elements, few of these items survive except in historic photographs. Where historic features survive, they should be preserved and maintained. Where evidence for historic features is available, an effort should be made to replicate them in newer, more durable materials that will reduce maintenance and replacement costs. The City has recently installed new strap iron benches in public spaces in the downtown area and at Cable Car Square, and they would like to continue the use of this style throughout the historic districts. This style is suitable for public areas in residential and commercial areas of the districts. In the more residential areas of the district it is advisable to consider the introduction of trash and ash receptacles, and possibly planters in residential areas as well for public benefit. To minimize the costs of maintenance and replacement for the City, it is advisable to utilize one or two styles for all features throughout the historic districts and their neighboring areas. JP-16 Identification and preservation of existing historic features, such as hitching posts, benches or other seating, trash receptacles, etc. that were provided for public use. Damage or flaws may prevent the retention or continued use of these items, but they should be documented and preserved in storage to serve as a guide for new features. New features based upon historical precedents. These can be executed in contemporary materials and finishes to increase durability. Note that amenities such as benches and signs that are constructed largely or entirely of wood will be more easily damaged and will require regular maintenance. New features that reference the style of historic features, to establish a unified appearance and general historic character among the public amenities in the historic districts. Installation of amenities purchased through the City, or through the City s suppliers, for use on private property. One group or party should be designated for the maintenance of plantings in planters. NOT Removal or destruction of existing historic features, either deliberately or through deferred maintenance. Installation of new features that do not reference historical features, or that are not coordinated with the features recommended by the Guidelines. Benches and waste receptacles composed largely or entirely of smooth or pebblefaced concrete or plastic. Installation of features that do not meet current City codes.

AMENITIES COMMERICIAL A variety of public amenities are required in public areas for the convenience of the public. Historically these would include items such as benches or other forms of seating, trash receptacles, clocks, hitching posts, and street signs. Due to intensive usage and constant exposure to the elements, few of these items survive except in historic photographs. Where historic features survive, they should be preserved and maintained. Where evidence for historic features is available, an effort should be made to replicate them in newer, more durable materials that will reduce maintenance and replacement costs. The City has recently installed new strap iron benches in public spaces in the downtown area and at Cable Car Square, and they would like to continue the use of this style throughout the historic districts. This style is suitable for public areas in residential and commercial areas of the districts. In the more commercial areas of Old Main and south Cathedral district, it is advisable to consider the introduction of trash and ash receptacles, clocks, and possibly planters as well for public benefit. To minimize the costs of maintenance and replacement for the City, it is advisable to utilize one or two styles for all features throughout the historic districts and their neighboring areas. JP-17 Identification and preservation of any existing historic features, such as hitching posts, benches or other seating, etc. that were provided for public use. Damage or flaws may prevent the retention or continued use of these items, but they should be documented and preserved in storage to serve as a guide for new features. New features based upon historical precedents. These can be executed in contemporary materials and finishes to increase durability. Note that amenities such as benches and signs that are constructed largely or entirely of wood will be more easily damaged and will require regular maintenance. New features that reference the style of historic features, to establish a unified appearance and general historic character among the public amenities in the historic districts. One group or party should be designated for the maintenance of plantings in planters. NOT Removal or destruction of existing historic features, either deliberately or through deferred maintenance. Installation of new features that do not reference historical features, or that are not coordinated with the features recommended by the Guidelines. Benches and waste receptacles composed largely or entirely of smooth or pebble-faced concrete or plastic. Installation of features that do not meet current City codes.

AMENITIES JP-18 New strap iron bench at 3 rd and Main Detail of strap iron bench at Cable Car Square Detail of planter and light in Cable Car Square Bollards Two examples of appropriate wood and iron benches Historic property marker/hitching post

AMENITIES JP-19 Appropriate Litter receptacles and ash urns Strap iron litter receptacles Examples of appropriate bicycle rack designs

SIGNS AND GRAPHICS The commercial areas of the historic districts including all of the Old Main district and the central portion of the Cathedral district near Cable Car Square have exhibited a wide array of signs from the late nineteenth century through the present day. Few examples from the nineteenth century survive, but there is photographic evidence for signs on Main Street throughout the twentieth century. It is desirable that new signs attempt to reference the historic signs of the early twentieth century in is size, scale, style, and coloration, but substitute materials are acceptable for the purposes of increased durability. Several examples of appropriate signs can be seen in Cable Car Square. Given its age and cultural significance, neon signs from the mid-century are now considered to be historic in their own right. The retention and/or replication of these materials for contemporary use should be evaluated by the Preservation Commission on a case-by-case basis. All signs also should follow regulations outlined in City ordinances. JP-20 Identification, repair, and preservation of existing signs from the first half of the twentieth century or earlier. Identification and preservation of signs from the 1950s and 1960s, where appropriate. Signs constructed of traditional and historic materials such as carved and painted wood, cast bronze, or painted metal. Signs that replicate or reference historic signage in their style, scale, and materials. Signs that replicate symbols or logos associated with the business, product or trade. Coordination of sign colors with overall scheme of building exterior. Placement of signs at traditional locations, such as storefront belt courses, upper façade walls, hanging or mounted inside the windows, or projecting from the face of the building. NOT Removal or destruction of historic signs either through deliberate action or neglect. Signs that are out of scale with the building, and with neighboring buildings and signs. Signs of inappropriate materials, such as plastic or vinyl. Insertion or attachment of signs in such a way as to inflict damage to the building. Internally lit signs.

SIGNS AND GRAPHICS Signage should recognize the scale, style, materials, and colors of the building and the district. Shown are several examples of contemporary signs indicating the recommended styles, scale, materials, hangers, and points of placement for sign features in the historic districts. JP-21 Lighting of signs is both a practical and attractive addition. Lighting should be done in a manner that is inconspicuous, and focuses light directly on the signage (below).

SIGNS AND GRAPHICS NOT JP-22 Street and directional signage should make an attempt to recognize the stylistic features and characteristics of the historic districts in their materials and graphics. Signage should recognize the scale, style, materials, and colors of the building and the district. Signage should not dominate the façade (above), nor should it cover or damage important architectural features. Plastic internally-lit signs (left) are a late twentieth-century phenomenon, and generally are not considered appropriate for historic districts due to their graphics, materials, and overall appearance

WAYFINDING FEATURES The nature and appearance of street signs and wayfinding materials are determined to a certain extent by code. The size, shape, and graphics of street signs may not be altered in certain instances. However, the City has recently installed decorative signposts in the area around the City Hall. It is recommended that this type of post, or a variant of it, be used for new signs. Kiosks and information boards are not historic features of Dubuque, but they are important assets in serving both the local population and visitors to the city. New wayfinding materials should be in keeping with the style, materials and colors established for other public amenities such as benches and waste receptacles. It may be desirable to alter the wayfinding materials slightly in color, material, or style for each district as a means of clearly separating and defining them according to their historic character. JP-23 Maintain a consistency of style, color, and scale in all wayfinding features to contribute to the overall historic character of each district in general, and the amenities in particular. Maintain a consistency in style of text and graphics within each district, or within the districts as a whole. Decorative signposts that reference historic street features. New gateways or banners that are consistent with the styles, colors, and materials selected for each district s wayfinding materials, or for the districts in general. NOT New signs, kiosks or boards that are incompatible with the other streetscape amenities. New wayfinding materials that are out of scale with the surrounding buildings and streetscape, or with the other streetscape amenities. Installation of wayfinding materials in such a manner as to disrupt or block critical vistas or views. Installation of wayfinding features in such a way as to damage existing historic streetscape materials, or the surrounding structures. Banners or other gateway markers may be desirable as a means of defining each district. Historic examples are recorded in photographs, and these should be replicated or referenced.

WAYFINDING FEATURES JP-24 Contemporary marker for Cable Car Square incorporating historic fencing and typical retaining wall materials Typical new street sign with decorative post used near City Hall Directional sign variants, with street names and attractions Welcome and information sign NOT Street and directional signage should make an attempt to recognize the stylistic features and characteristics of the historic districts in their materials and graphics.

STREET LIGHTING Several examples of historic lighting in the Old Main district are recorded in historic photographs, and several examples of street light fixtures dating from the early twentieth century have been preserved and reused in the downtown area. It is not feasible to retrofit these fixtures for continued use throughout the downtown due to problems of repair and long-term maintenance. Recently the City has installed new street lighting posts in the downtown, and they would like to continue using this style for durability and ease of maintenance. Street lights may represent another area where districts can express their historic character through differing styles, materials, or colors of lamp posts and globes. This will need to be balanced with issues of cost and upkeep for the City. Preservation, repair and reuse of original fixtures whenever possible. JP-25 Documentation and storage of historic fixtures for reference or protected usage. New lighting that is consistent with the historic lighting in its scale, style, materials, and colors. New lighting that is installed at a height appropriate for the streetscape. Purchase and use of City-approved lighting fixtures by private property owners for installation on their property. Consider color-corrected metal halide lighting to provide better color rendition of the historic materials. NOT Destruction or removal of existing historic light fixtures that can be salvaged or repaired. Installation of new lighting in such as way as to block key vistas or views. Installation of lighting in such a way as to damage existing historic streetscape elements, or surrounding buildings.

STREET LIGHTING JP-26 New light installed by the City in Old Main and Cathedral Districts New lighting installed at a pedestrian scale height on taller light posts Historic photo showing original gas lights NOT Contemporary photo showing historic lighting reinstalled on bridge in downtown Historic photo showing specialty lighting for chemist shop in the shape of a mortar and pestle

YARD AND PARK FEATURES The historic districts contain a large percentage of green space scattered throughout in the form of private yards and public parks, most notably and Washington Park. Historic documentation has allowed for the recreation of the pathways and pergola in Washington Park, and similar documentation is available for Jackson Park. It is desirable that this park be restored to its appearance in the early twentieth century. This does not preclude the insertion of contemporary outdoor sculpture or outdoor installations in these spaces, however. Yard space that is on private property is not generally regulated by the City. It is recommended that private property owners remain aware of the views of their property from the public way, and to maintain these views in a manner that is consistent with the historic character of their district. JP-27 Restoration of public parks and greenspaces to their original layout and landscaping plans (if appropriate), including the restoration or recreation of pergolas or grandstands. Evaluation of later changes to public parks and greenspaces to determine their historical significance. Installation of amenities and wayfinding materials in public greenspaces that are in keeping with the rest of that district. Maintaining private property that is visible from the public way in a manner that is in keeping with the historic character of the district. Installation of public sculpture or other displays of outdoor art in public greenspaces. Installation of artwork on publicly-visible private property that is in keeping with the scale of its surroundings. Installation of fountains or other water features on publicly-visible private property that is keeping with the scale and character of the surrounding district s streetscape. NOT Removal of any existing historic landscaping or park feature. Installation of new features on public greenspaces that do not respect the scale or character of their surrounding district. Installation of new artwork, fountains, or pergolas, etc. on publicly-visible private property that does not respect the scale or character of the surrounding district.

YARD AND PARK FEATURES JP-28 Park-like treatment of the large lot surrounding this property includes ample plantings, low transparent fences, and appropriately styled and scaled signs. Historic photo of, c. 1878 Washington Park in the Cathedral District has been revived and portions of its original landscaping features restored to their historic appearance, most notably the gazebo in the center. A similar treatment is recommended for Jackson Park.

LANDSCAPING Some photographic evidence exists for the various forms of landscaping that have existed in the historic districts over time. These schemes may not be appropriate for restoration. Landscaping in the historic districts will be guided largely by the existing landscaping ordinance, which designates tree and shrub species, sizes, and appropriate locations on public and private property. Where evidence of a historic landscape feature exists, and can contribute to the historic character of the district, efforts should be made to preserve or restore these features. Such work should be carried out with the consultation of the City Forester to ensure that it meets the City ordinance, and does not pose a threat to the health of the surrounding landscape, or the safety of the public. JP-29 Identification, preservation, and restoration of historic landscape features whenever possible. New landscaping that meets the requirements of the landscaping ordinance. Restoration or recreation of landscaping features that have local historical or cultural significance for the district or the city in general. Preserve and maintain mature trees, replacing them when they become diseased or die. NOT Insertion of new landscaping features that may pose a hazard to the health of surrounding landscape features, or to public safety. Installation of new landscape features that will contribute to the deterioration of nearby structures or streetscape features.

LANDSCAPING JP-30 Street trees on Main Street in the 1880s Two examples of historically sensitive landscaping treatments Street trees and landscaping on north Main (left) and landscaping above a retaining wall for a freestanding house (right)

UTILITIES The standard procedures for utilities govern the size, appearance, and location of their services. It is recommended that an attempt be made to provide more inconspicuous service boxes in the historic districts, either through the modification of the covers, the location of the boxes themselves, or through screening with landscape elements. Some common streetscape amenities, such as bollards, planters, and ash urns, may be able to be modified to conceal certain equipment, provided that they will be easily removable or have doors to allow access for maintenance. Always contact telephone, gas, and electrical utilities companies with your proposal for screening or disguising their equipment prior to beginning work. They may have clearance requirements related to the equipment s safety and accessibility that must be considered. JP-31 New utility boxes that are less invasive in their appearance and/or their location. Burying all new or upgraded utility service to reduce the number of overhead lines in the historic districts. Using plantings to disguise or screen utilities equipment. Consider modifying common landscape and streetscape amenities to disguise utilities equipment, as shown in the Recommended section on the following page. Confirming clearance and access requirements with utilities companies before beginning work around their equipment. NOT Placing utility service boxes in open areas that are prominently visible from the street, as shown in the Not Recommended section on the following page. Obstructing maintenance access to utilities with covers, fences, landscape elements or plantings, potentially causing a safety hazard. Existing electrical service runs above ground, creating a network of wires over the streets and the historic properties. The City may consider the option of burying utilities on all new construction, and on all repairs in the historic districts.

UTILITIES JP-32 Ash Urn Bollard Planter Landscaping elements that could potentially be modified and used to disguise or screen utilities equipment. Ash Urn NOT Utilities equipment, placed in prominent areas and without screening of any kind.