APPENDIX B SOIL SURVEY INFORMATION

Similar documents
SOIL DATA: Avondale. in Allen, TX. This information was taken from NRCS web soil survey of Collin County, Texas.

Soils and Land Use Test

Road Soil. Curtis F. Berthelot Ph.D., P.Eng. Department of Civil Engineering. Road Soil Introduction

Soil characteristics that influence nitrogen and water management

STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MISSOURI ASSESSOR MANUAL

Iowa FFA Soil Career Development Event 2008

Soil Interpretations Erosion and Sedimentation Control Planning and Design Workshop

(Refer Slide Time: 03:23)

2018 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam 1. Landscape positions characterizes the location of the soil on the landscape and identifies potential risks.

2011 Wisconsin Envirothon Soils and Land Use Exam

Horner-McLaughlin Woods: Soil Types

SOIL ENGINEERING (EENV 4300)

2016 Iowa FFA Soils Evaluation CDE Exam

2014 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam

Unit II Soil Management

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

IOWA FFA STATE SOILS CDE SATURDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2007 AMES, IOWA


Hydrologic Soil Group

Team number Page 1 of Canon Envirothon Soils Station Test. Soils and Climate Change

2016 Area 3 Envirothon Muskingum County Soils Test ANSWER KEY

ASCE - Philadelphia. Soils & Stormwater Management. Matthew C. Hostrander, CPSS, SEO Soil Scientist. Gilmore & Associates, Inc.

2012 FINAL SOILS AREA 2 Envirothon Questions Answer KEY

URBAN SOILS & SEATTLE EXAMPLES

Raingardens. Conserving and Protecting Water L

Soil Properties That Distinguish Ecological Sites

ATLANTIC TESTING LABORATORIES

DO YOU KNOW YOUR SOILS? (Rev. 10/11)

2 Older farm homes on the land

RaC. RaD GlG. GlF. RaD GlE. CeA. RaE. RcD. GoF. GoF SkC. SkD. CfA. AdA. GoF. GoF. GoF. RcD. GgD. GoF. RaE GlE. RaE DbF. GoF. DbE. RaC.

Examining soils in the field. Examining soils in the field. Environment Agency thinksoils examining soils in the field

2014 Envirothon Georgia Soil Study Guide

Subsoil conditions are examined using test borings, provided by soil engineer (geotechnical).

ON LANDSCAPING, SOILS, SOIL AMENDMENTS AND PROPER SEED ESTABLISHMENT (BOTH GRASS LAWNS AND MEADOWS).

2017 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam

Section 1. Judging the soil pit (questions 1-4)

ARIZONA WATER COMPANY

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

SOIL SEPARATES. Soil Evaluator Day 2, Presentation 3-3/27/2018. Soil Texture, Page 1 TITLE 5 SOIL EVALUATOR CERTIFICATION TRAINING SOIL TEXTURE

If you are not able to turn in your notebook see me or Dan ASAP

-AIHL NOISE UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM. Aqx. R CORPS OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY APPENDIX A

Land Capability Classifications

September 20, 2016 Soils Investigation for Agricultural Designation Windemere Place, Missoula County, Montana

4.0 EROSION AND SEDIMENT PROCESS. 4.1 Mechanics of Erosion

An Introduction to Soil Stabilization for Pavements

Custom Soil Resource Report for Craighead County, Arkansas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin

CONNECTICUT ENVIROTHON 2012 SOILS QUESTIONS

Custom Soil Resource Report for Southampton County, Virginia

Site Evaluation and Considerations for Design and Review of Bioretention. Jay Dorsey & John Mathews ODNR-DSWR June 18, 2014

Soil Physical Properties

Indirect Design Comparison of the structural strength of the pipe (Three- Edge-Bearing Test) to the field supporting strength of a buried pipe.

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

The Nature of Soil Soil Conservation Sustainable Ag.

The following general requirements will be met for all planter box installations:

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

Hydric Soils - Overview

NYC Envirothon 2017 Soil Science Review. Richard K Shaw USDA-NRCS

SECTION PLANTING SOIL for SOIL CELLS. This specification defines material and performance requirements for soils which are to be used

DIRT! APES Laboratory Activity

ATT-19/95 MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATION, Standard Compaction, µm Material

CHECKLIST BMPs for FIELD NURSERIES REGULATIONS, SITE SELECTION, WATER MANAGEMENT

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION WITTON PARK, COUNTY DURHAM PROPOSED QUARRY EXTENSION DECEMBER 1992

Soil testing Page 1. Contrary to what is widely believed, the colour of the soil reveals very little about its fertility.

In 1983, the town evacuated and purchased by government for $36 million

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hinds County, Mississippi

2.1.4 Roof Downspout Rain Gardens

BENNING ROAD & BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS NRCS SOIL RESOURCE REPORT DRAFT MAY 2016

EDULABZ. Ans. (b) 7. The soft, porous layer with a good water-retaining capacity forms the

Wisconsin Contractors Institute Continuing Education

Pits 1 & 3 Questions. 7. Subsurface: Texture (5 pts) A. Coarse B. Moderately course C. Medium D. Fine E. Very Fine

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gallia County, Ohio

Specifying Soils for Plant Growth

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kane County, Illinois

UNIFIED FACILITIES GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS

Area 3 Envirothon Soils Questions Key

Post Construction BMPs

Custom Soil Resource Report for Daviess County, Missouri

Understanding Soils. 1. What is Soil? 2. What does soil do for us?

My Soil Won t Drain, Can I Still Use LID? Rob Buchert, John Knutson, Erik Pruneda

Custom Soil Resource Report for Columbia County, New York

Sydney Road Reclaimed Water Main, Plant City, Florida. Prepared for: Jones Edmunds & Associates, Inc.

Soils and their Relationship with Agriculture

Construction Site Erosion Control

1. Position (2 pts.) 2. Parent Material (2 pts.) 3. Slope Characteristics (2 pts.) 4. Surface Stoniness or Rockiness (2 pts.)

SOIL SCIENTIST REPORT FOR THE CONNECTICUT PORTION OF THE CONNECTICUT EXPANSION PROJECT. Prepared for:

LANDPKS TEACHING MANUAL

Custom Soil Resource Report for Pope County, Illinois

7. NATURAL RESOURCES IN THE GRAZING LEASE AREA

EXAMPLE Point A: Sandy Loam: 65% Sand _ 20% Silt _ 15% Clay. Point B: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point C: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point D: %Sand % Silt % Clay

Scheduling Irrigation for Horticultural Crops. Patrick Byers Regional Horticulture Specialist Greene County

Scheduling Irrigation for Horticultural Crops

Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States: For All Soils. Field Indicators. Indicators for all soils regardless of texture

Loam: About 40% sand, 40% silt, 20% clay. Mixture of pore sizes to balance water retention and aeration. Considered the best soil for growing crops.

Soil Survey of San Luis Obispo County, California Paso Robles Area

Appendix E Soils Information

The relationship between soil (growing

Sustainable Sites. hblanarc.ca. RDN Workshop June 25, David Reid, FCSLA, Landscape Architect, Environmental Designer

New Development Stormwater Guidelines

APPENDIX E COMPACTION CHARACTERISTICS AND EQUIPMENT

Transcription:

Oregon DEQ APPENDIX B SOIL SURVEY INFORMATION OREGON MANUAL-APPENDICES.DOC Erosion and Sediment Control Manual

Oregon DEQ Appendix B - Soil Survey Information Soil Survey Information The USDA/NRCS Soil Survey tables contain valuable information to assist with design and selection of site BMPs. A typical Soil Survey contains three tables of particular interest: Physical Properties of the Soils; Water Features; and Engineering Index Properties. Relevant information available from each of these tables is discussed below. Soil Survey Table J1b Physical Properties of Soils Erosion factors are shown in Table J1b (presented below for select Multnomah County Soils) and include the K factor (labeled as K f in Table J1b), the Kw factor and the T factor. The erosion factor Kf indicates the erodibility of the fine-earth fraction, or the material less than 2 millimeters in size. Erosion factor Kw indicates the erodibility of the whole soil. The estimates are modified by the presence of rock fragments. Value listed for Kf factor should be used for factor K in the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) as discussed below. Erosion factor K indicates the susceptibility of a soil to sheet and rill erosion by water. K is one of six factors used in RUSLE to predict the average annual rate of soil loss by sheet and rill erosion in tons per acre per year. The estimates are based primarily on percentage of silt, sand, and organic matter and on soil structure and permeability. The Soil Erodibility Factor K (K f in Table J1b) is used in RUSLE and indicates the susceptibility of the fine-earth fraction, or the material less than 2 millimeters in size, of the soil to sheet and rill erosion by rainfall. Rocks and rock fragments in the soil profile are not considered (hence why the factor Kw is not used in the RUSLE equation). Values for K range from 0.02 to 0.69. The higher the value, the more susceptible the soil is to sheet and rill erosion by rainfall. Erosion factor T is an estimate of the maximum average annual rate of soil erosion by wind or water that can occur without affecting crop productivity over a sustained period. Values of T range from 1 to 5 tons/acre/year and are based on depth of soil to bedrock and the type of bedrock. The T factor is not used for construction site erosion. Wind erodibility groups are made up of soils that have similar properties affecting their susceptibility to wind erosion in cultivated areas. The soils OREGON MANUAL-APPENDICES.DOC B-1 Erosion and Sediment Control Manual

Oregon DEQ Appendix B - Soil Survey Information assigned to group 1 are the most susceptible to wind erosion, and those assigned to group 8 are the least susceptible. The groups are as follows: Group Soil Description Number 1 Coarse sands, sands, fine sands, and very fine sands. 2 3 4L 4 5 6 7 8 Loamy coarse sands, loamy sands, loamy fine sands, loamy very fine sands, ash material, and sapric soil material. Coarse sandy loams, sandy loams, fine sandy loams, and very fine sandy loams. Calcareous loams, silt loams, clay loams, and silty clay loams. Clays, silty clays, noncalcareous clay loams, and silty clay loams that are more than 35 percent clay. Noncalcareous loams and silt loams that are less than 20 percent clay and sandy clay loams, sandy clays, and hemic soil material. Noncalcareous loams and silt loams that are more than 20 percent clay and noncalcareous clay loams that are less than 35 percent clay. Silts, noncalcareous silty clay loams that are less than 35 percent clay, and fibric soil material. Soils that are not subject to wind erosion because of coarse fragments on the surface or because of surface wetness. Wind erodibility index is a numerical value indicating the susceptibility of soil to wind erosion, or the tons per acre per year that can be expected to be lost to wind erosion and is used in the Wind Erosion Equation (WEQ) and is based on soil texture and the relationship of dry soil aggregates greater than 0.84 mm to potential erosion rates of 0 to 310 tons/acre/year from a wide, bare field. This value applies only to the surface layer. There is a close correlation between wind erosion and the texture of the surface layer, the size and durability of surface clods, rock fragments, organic matter, and a calcareous reaction. Soil moisture and frozen soil layers also influence wind erosion. Soil Survey Table K1 Water Features Table K1 (presented below for select Multnomah County Soils) gives estimates of various water features. The estimates are used in land use planning that involves engineering considerations. OREGON MANUAL-APPENDICES.DOC B-2 Erosion and Sediment Control Manual

Appendix B - Soil Survey Information Oregon DEQ Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from longduration storms. The four hydrologic soil groups are: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. The months in the table indicate the portion of the year in which the feature is most likely to be a concern. Wetness refers to a saturated zone in the soil. Table K1 indicates, by month, depth to the top (upper limit) and base (lower limit) of the saturated zone in most years. Estimates of the upper and lower limits are based mainly on observations of the water table at selected sites and on evidence of a saturated zone, namely grayish colors or OREGON MANUAL-APPENDICES.DOC B-3 Erosion and Sediment Control Manual

Appendix B - Soil Survey Information Oregon DEQ mottles (redoximorphic features) in the soil. A saturated zone that lasts for less than a month is not considered a water table. Ponding is standing water in a closed depression. Unless a drainage system is installed, the water is removed only by percolation, transpiration, or evaporation. Table K1 indicates surface water depth and the duration and frequency of ponding. Duration is expressed as very brief if less than 2 days, brief if 2 to 7 days, long if 7 to 30 days, and very long if more than 30 days. Frequency is expressed as none, rare, occasional, and frequent. None means that ponding is not probable; rare that it is unlikely but possible under unusual weather conditions (the chance of ponding is nearly 0 percent to 5 percent in any year); occasional that it occurs, on the average, once or less in 2 years (the chance of ponding is 5 to 50 percent in any year); and frequent that it occurs, on the average, more than once in 2 years (the chance of ponding is more than 50 percent in any year). Flooding is the temporary inundation of an area caused by overflowing streams, by runoff from adjacent slopes, or by tides. Water standing for short periods after rainfall or snowmelt is not considered flooding, and water standing in swamps and marshes is considered ponding rather than flooding. Duration and frequency are estimated. Duration is expressed as extremely brief if 0.1 hour to 4 hours, very brief if 4 hours to 2 days, brief if 2 to 7 days, long if 7 to 30 days, and very long if more than 30 days. Frequency is expressed as none, very rare, rare, occasional, frequent, and very frequent. None means that flooding is not probable; very rare mean that it is very unlikely but possible under extremely unusual weather conditions (the chance of flooding is less than 1 percent in any year); rare that it is unlikely but possible under unusual weather conditions (the chance of flooding is 1 to 5 percent in any year); occasional means that it occurs infrequently under normal weather conditions (the chance of flooding is 5 to 50 percent in any year); frequent means that it is likely to occur often under normal weather conditions (the chance of flooding is more than 50 percent in any year but is less than 50 percent in all months in any year); and very frequent means that it is likely to occur very often under normal weather conditions (the chance of flooding is more than 50 percent in all months of any year). The information is based on evidence in the soil profile, namely thin strata of gravel, sand, silt, or clay deposited by floodwater; irregular decrease in organic matter content with increasing depth; and little or no horizon development. Also considered are local information about the extent and levels of flooding and the relation of each soil on the landscape to historic floods. Information on the OREGON MANUAL-APPENDICES.DOC B-4 Erosion and Sediment Control Manual

Appendix B - Soil Survey Information Oregon DEQ extent of flooding based on soil data is less specific than that provided by detailed engineering surveys that delineate flood-prone areas at specific flood frequency levels. Soil Survey Table H Engineering Index Properties Table H (presented below for select Multnomah County Soils) provides the engineering classifications and the range of index properties for the layers of each soil in the survey area. Depth to the upper and lower boundaries of each layer is indicated. Texture is given in the standard terms used by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. These terms are defined according to percentages of sand, silt, and clay in the fraction of the soil that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. "Loam," for example, is soil that is 7 to 27 percent clay, 28 to 50 percent silt, and less than 52 percent sand. If the content of particles coarser than sand is 15 percent or more, an appropriate modifier is added, for example, "gravelly." Classification of the soils is determined according to the Unified soil classification system (ASTM, 1998) and the system adopted by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO, 1998). The Unified system classifies soils according to properties that affect their use as construction material. Soils are classified according to particle-size distribution of the fraction less than 3 inches in diameter and according to plasticity index, liquid limit, and organic matter content. Sandy and gravelly soils are identified as GW, GP, GM, GC, SW, SP, SM, and SC; silty and clayey soils as ML, CL, OL, MH, CH, and OH; and highly organic soils as PT. Soils exhibiting engineering properties of two groups can have a dual classification, for example, CL-ML. The AASHTO system classifies soils according to those properties that affect roadway construction and maintenance. In this system, the fraction of a mineral soil that is less than 3 inches in diameter is classified in one of seven groups from A-1 through A- 7 on the basis of particle-size distribution, liquid limit, and plasticity index. Soils in group A-1 are coarse grained and low in content of fines (silt and clay). At the other extreme, soils in group A-7 are fine grained. Highly organic soils are classified in group A-8 on the basis of visual inspection. If laboratory data are available, the A-1, A-2, and A-7 groups are further classified as A-1-a, A-1-b, A-2-4, A-2-5, A-2-6, A-2-7, A-7-5, or A-7-6. As an additional OREGON MANUAL-APPENDICES.DOC B-5 Erosion and Sediment Control Manual

Appendix B - Soil Survey Information Oregon DEQ refinement, the suitability of a soil as subgrade material can be indicated by a group index number. Group index numbers range from 0 for the best subgrade material to 20 or higher for the poorest. The AASHTO classification for soils tested, with group index numbers in parentheses, is given in table R. Rock fragments larger than 10 inches in diameter and 3 to 10 inches in diameter are indicated as a percentage of the total soil on a dry-weight basis. The percentages are estimates determined mainly by converting volume percentage in the field to weight percentage. Percentage (of soil particles) passing designated sieves is the percentage of the soil fraction less than 3 inches in diameter based on an ovendry weight. The sieves, numbers 4, 10, 40, and 200 (USA Standard Series), have openings of 4.76, 2.00, 0.420, and 0.074 millimeters, respectively. Estimates are based on laboratory tests of soils sampled in the survey area and in nearby areas and on estimates made in the field. Liquid limit and plasticity index (Atterberg limits) indicate the plasticity characteristics of a soil. The estimates are based on test data from the survey area or from nearby areas and on field examination. The estimates of particle-size distribution, liquid limit, and plasticity index are generally rounded to the nearest 5 percent. Thus, if the ranges of gradation and Atterberg limits extend a marginal amount (1 or 2 percentage points) across classification boundaries, the classification in the marginal zone is generally omitted in the table. OREGON MANUAL-APPENDICES.DOC B-6 Erosion and Sediment Control Manual

Appendix B - Soil Survey Information Oregon DEQ List of Soil Survey Areas in Oregon - Soil surveys are available for the following areas: OR007 Clatsop County OR009 Columbia County OR011 Coos County OR015 Curry County OR021 Gilliam County OR049 Morrow County OR051 Multnomah County Area OR053 Polk County OR055 Sherman County OR057 Tillamook County OR067 Washington County OR601 Alsea Area OR604 Baker County Area OR605 Deschutes National Forest OR606 Benton County OR607 Umatilla National Forest OR608 Mt Hood National Forest OR610 Clackamas County Area OR618 Crook County Area OR620 Upper Deschutes River Area OR622 Umpqua National Forest OR625 Union County Area OR626 Malheur National Forest OR627 Grant County Northwestern Part OR628 Harney County Area OR629 Hood River County Area OR633 Grant County Central Part OR637 Lane County Area OR638 Lincoln County Area OR639 Linn County Area OR641 Malheur County Northeastern Part OR643 Marion County Area OR649 Douglas County Area OR654 Prineville Area OR657 Willamette National Forest OR663 South Umpqua Area OR666 Trout Creek-Shaniko Area OR667 Umatilla County Area OR670 Wallowa County Area OR673 Wasco County Northern Part OR674 Warm Springs Indian Reservation OR677 Wheeler County Area OR679 Yamhill Area OR681 Klamath County Northern Part OR682 Crater Lake National Park OR683 Winema NF Area OR683 Rogue River-Winema National Forest Area Additional soil information and select soil surveys available online may be found at the following web link: http://www.or.nrcs.usda.gov/pnw_soil/or_data.html Not all soil surveys have been published or are available through the NRCS website presented above. If additional information regarding site specific soils or to identify a location of a soil survey for your site, contact your state or local NRCS District Conservationist or soil scientist. A list of contacts is presented below. OREGON MANUAL-APPENDICES.DOC B-7 Erosion and Sediment Control Manual

Oregon DEQ Statewide McGrath, Chad (503) 414-3003 State Soil Scientist, USDA: NRCS 101 SW Main, Suite 1600 Portland, OR 97204-3221 Baird, Brandi (541) 258-3109 Soil GIS Specialist, OSU - NRCS: Dept. of Crop & Soil Science Ag & Life Sci. Bldg, Rm 3017 Corvallis, OR 97331-7306 Snake River Basin, John Day / Umatilla Basin Gerig, Allen (541) 523-4438 x116 Resource Soil Scientist, USDA: NRCS 3330 Pocahontas Rd. Baker City, OR 97814-2108 Lower Willamette, Central Coast/Upper Willamete, and North Coast Basins, Deschutes, High Desert, and Southwest Basins No Contact Information is Available Contact your State Soil Scientist Benton County Soil Survey Office USDA - NRCS Tangent Service Center 33630 McFarland Road Tangent, OR 97389 Fillmore, Matthew (541) 967-5925 x116 Soil Survey Project Leader Paup-Lefferts, Kelley (541) 967-5925 x115 Soil Scientist NRCS: Crook Co. SS USDA - AG Service Center 625 SE Salmon Road, Suite 4 Redmond, OR 97756 Weinheimer, Jerry (541) 923-4358-X121 Soil Survey Project Leader Clark, Thomas (541) 923-4358-X118 Soil Scientist Kern, Dick (541) 923-4358 X117 Soil Scientist Appendix B - Soil Survey Information NRCS: Grant Co. SS 721 S Canyon Blvd John Day, OR 97845-1084 Kienzle, Jamie (541) 575-0135 x102 Soil Survey Project Leader Winther, Stan (541) 575-0135 x107 Soil Scientist NRCS: North Lake and Harney Co. SS PO Box 848 HC-74 12858 Hwy 20 West Hines, OR 97738-0701 Keller, Mark (541) 573-7550 x102 Soil Survey Project Leader North Klamath Soil Survey/EUI USFS- Winema N.F. 2819 Daliah St. Klamath Falls, OR 97601 Sue Malone (541) 883-6880 Soil Survey Project Leader Jim Dorr (541) 883-6891 EUI Project Leader NRCS: Tillamook Co. SS 6415 Signal Street Tillamook, OR 97141-2417 Shipman, John (503) 842-2848 x112 Project Leader Ducey, Cory (503) 842-2848 Soil Scientist NRCS: Willamette Valley Soil Survey Update/Yamhill Co. SS 3867 Wolverine St., NE Salem, OR 97305-4267 Willamette Valley Soil Survey Update Johnson, Dave (503) 399-5746 x120 Soil Scientist OREGON MANUAL-APPENDICES.DOC B-8 Erosion and Sediment Control Manual

Table H. - Engineering Index Properties Multnomah County Area, Oregon Absence of an entry indicates that the data were not estimated. 1A: Map Symbol and Soil Name Classification Fragments Depth USDA Texture >10 3-10 Unified AASHTO Inches Inches 4 10 In Pct Pct Percent Passing Sieve Number 40 200 Aloha 0-9 Silt Loam ML A-4 0 0 100 100 95-100 80-90 25-30 NP-5 9-48 Silt Loam Loam ML A-4 0 0 100 100 95-100 80-90 25-30 NP-5 48-60 Loam Silt Loam Very Fine Sandy Loam ML A-4 0 0 100 100 85-100 60-90 25-30 NP-5 Liquid Limit Pct Plasticity Index 1B: Aloha 0-9 Silt Loam ML A-4 0 0 100 100 95-100 80-90 25-30 NP-5 9-48 Silt Loam Loam ML A-4 0 0 100 100 95-100 80-90 25-30 NP-5 48-60 Loam Very Fine Sandy Loam Silt Loam ML A-4 0 0 100 100 85-100 60-90 25-30 NP-5 2A: Aloha 0-9 Silt Loam ML A-4 0 0 100 100 95-100 80-90 25-30 NP-5 9-48 Loam Silt Loam ML A-4 0 0 100 100 95-100 80-90 25-30 NP-5 48-60 Very Fine Sandy Loam Loam Silt Loam ML A-4 0 0 100 100 85-100 60-90 25-30 NP-5 Urban Land 0-6 Variable 3D: Distribution Generation Date: 8/13/02 Page 1 of 40

Table J1b. - Physical Properties of the Soils Multnomah County Area, Oregon Entries under "Erosion Factors--T" apply to the entire profile. Entries under "Wind Erodibility Group" and "Wind Erodibility Index" apply only to the surface layer. Absence of an entry indicates that data were not estimated. 1A: Map Symbol and Soil Name Depth In Sand Silt Clay Pct Pct Pct Moist Bulk Density g/cc Permeability (Ksat) In/Hr Available Water Capacity In/In Linear Extensibility Pct Organic Matter Pct Erosion Factors Kw Kf T Aloha 0-9 15-20 1.35-1.55 0.6-2 0.19-0.21 0.0-2.9 2.0-3.0.32.32 5 5 56 9-48 18-27 1.40-1.55 0.2-0.6 0.19-0.21 0.0-2.9 0.5-2.0.43.43 48-60 10-25 1.45-1.60 0.2-0.6 0.16-0.21 0.0-2.9 0.0-0.5.55.55 Wind Erodibility Group Wind Erodibility Index 1B: Aloha 0-9 15-20 1.35-1.55 0.6-2 0.19-0.21 0.0-2.9 2.0-3.0.32.32 5 5 56 9-48 18-27 1.40-1.55 0.2-0.6 0.19-0.21 0.0-2.9 0.5-2.0.43.43 48-60 10-25 1.45-1.60 0.2-0.6 0.16-0.21 0.0-2.9 0.0-0.5.55.55 2A: Aloha 0-9 15-20 1.35-1.55 0.6-2 0.19-0.21 0.0-2.9 2.0-3.0.32.32 5 5 56 9-48 18-27 1.40-1.55 0.2-0.6 0.19-0.21 0.0-2.9 0.5-2.0.43.43 48-60 10-25 1.45-1.60 0.2-0.6 0.16-0.21 0.0-2.9 0.0-0.5.55.55 Urban Land 0-6 --- 3D: Aschoff 0-12 7-10 0.85-0.95 0.6-2 0.07-0.10 0.0-2.9 7.0-12.20.24 5 8 0 12-60 10-18 0.85-0.95 0.6-2 0.07-0.10 0.0-2.9 0.2-7.0.10.28 3E: Aschoff 0-12 7-10 0.85-0.95 0.6-2 0.07-0.10 0.0-2.9 7.0-12.20.24 5 8 0 12-60 10-18 0.85-0.95 0.6-2 0.07-0.10 0.0-2.9 0.2-7.0.10.28 3F: Aschoff 0-12 7-10 0.85-0.95 0.6-2 0.07-0.10 0.0-2.9 7.0-12.20.24 5 8 0 12-60 10-18 0.85-0.95 0.6-2 0.07-0.10 0.0-2.9 0.2-7.0.10.28 4F: Distribution Generation Date: 8/13/02 Page 1 of 21

Table K1. - Water Features Multnomah County Area, Oregon Depths of layers are in feet. Estimates of the frequency of ponding and flooding apply to the whole year rather than to individual months. Absence of an entry indicates that the feature is not a concern or that data were not estimated. 1A: Map Symbol and Soil Name Hydrologic Group Month Upper Limit Ft Water Table Lower Limit Ft Surface Depth Ft Ponding Duration Frequency Aloha C January 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 February 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 March 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 April 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 December 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 1B: Aloha C January 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 February 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 March 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 April 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 December 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 2A: Aloha C January 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 February 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 March 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 April 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 December 1.5-2.0 1.7-3.3 Urban Land --- Jan-Dec 3D: Aschoff B Jan-Dec 3E: 3F: Aschoff B Jan-Dec Aschoff B Jan-Dec Duration Flooding Frequency Distribution Generation Date: 8/13/02 Page 1 of 23