Irrigation Management in Walnut. Allan Fulton, Farm Advisor UC Cooperative Extension Tehama, Glenn, Colusa, and Shasta Counties

Similar documents
Irrigation management in a drought year. What drought means to the tree, and how best to deal with it

Effects of Regulated Deficit Irrigation on Walnut (Juglans regia) Grafted on Northern California Black (Juglans hindsii) or Paradox Rootstock

Walnut Marketing Board Final Project Report December Project Title: Irrigation Management and the Incidence of Kernel Mold in Walnut

Training Young Walnut Trees

University of California Cooperative Extension Butte County. Walnut Notes

GROWTH AND PERFORMANCE OF OWN-ROOTED CHANDLER AND VINA COMPARED TO PARADOX ROOTED TREES

Walnut Hedgerow Trial on Marginal Soils. Bill Krueger, John Edstrom and Wilbur Reil

2010 Crop in Review. Bill Krueger, UC Farm Advilsor, Glenn County

EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR PISTACHIO PRODUCTION

Training and Pruning Almond Trees

Registration & Trade Show. Trade show hosted by West Coast Nut.

walnuts on system and

EVALUATION OF CHANDLER CLONE WALNUT TREES ON VARIOUS ROOTSTOCKS INCLUDING ITS OWN ROOTS

Tree water use and irrigation

Walnut Newsletter. Early Walnut Tree Training: How to Handle Different Nursery Products. In this issue:

Fruit and Nut Notes. March Richard P. Buchner UC Farm Advisor -Orchard Crops, Tehama County Director

In a Nutshell Fresno County

Sacramento Valley Walnut News Summer, 2018

WALNUT BLIGHT CONTROL INVESTIGATIONS TEHAMA 2007

APR C:CEIVED. Objectives: Results : Project No : 94-PBB. Project Leader: PATRICK H. BROWN

Nitrogen and Potassium Utilization in Almond Orchards. F.J.A. Niederholzer UC ANR CE Farm Advisor, Colusa/Sutter/Yuba Counties February 7 th, 2017

Canopy Management Strategies

Pomology Notes. *Put on by USDA NRCS (Natural Resource Conservation Service). Please call ext. 3 for more information.

Sacramento Valley Walnut News Summer, 2018

Louise Ferguson, Extension Pomologist, University of California, Davis at Kearney Agricultural Center

FIRST YEAR RECOVERY FOLLOWING A SIMULATED DROUGHT IN WALNUT. D. A. Goldhamer, R. Beede, S. Sibbett, D. Ramos, D. Katayama, S. Fusi, and R.

Healthy Garden Tips Web site: Telephone: University of California Cooperative Extension Napa County

Tree Physiology: Young Trees and Orchard Management. December 8, 2016

Canopy Management Strategies

University of California Cooperative Extension Butte County

SACRAMENTO VALLEY REGIONAL ALMOND NEWSLETTER IN THIS ISSUE:

Paul Vossen University of California Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor. Dealing with Drought

In a Nutshell Tulare County

Project Leader: Gary S. Bender* 1

South Sacramento Valley Winter Almond Meeting. Franz Niederholzer, UC Farm Advisor, Colusa/Sutter/Yuba Counties

In a Nutshell Kern County

Irrigating Olives. Janet Caprile UCCE Farm Advisor Alameda & Contra Costa Counties

A COMPARISON STUDY OF MICRO-PROPAGATED CLONAL WALNUT ROOTSTOCK GROWTH FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS OF MICROBIAL AND HUMECTANT SOIL AMENDMENTS

KATHERINE JARVIS SHEAN, UC Coopera ve Extension Farm Advisor, Sacramento, Solano & Yolo Coun es;

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION GLENN COUNTY P.O. Box 697 (821 E. South St.), Orland, CA (530) FAX (530)

FUTURE ORCHARDS Crop Loading. Prepared by: John Wilton and Ross Wilson AGFIRST Nov 2007

Responses of Primocane Blackberries to Varying Mow-down and Tipping Regimes. Mark Gaskell, Farm Advisor San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties

Almond Culture and Orchard Management

Avocado Irrigation. Gary S. Bender Subtropical Horticulture

Developing and Optimizing Sweet Cherry Training Systems for Efficiency and High Quality Fruit Part 1. Gregory Lang Michigan State University

FRUIT AND NUT NOTES SACRAMENTO VALLEY REGIONAL WALNUT NEWSLETTER

Sacramento Valley Almond News October, 2018

Walnut Notes Volume 37 May 19, 2008

Sacramento Valley Almond News Fall, 2018

Pruning Blueberry Plants in Florida 1

Nutrient Considerations for Olives

Evaluation of grafting for the mature green tomato production system

Growing Berries in Carson Valley

Richfield Prunes, Pistachios & Walnuts

UCCE Statewide Prune Day March 2, 2005 Vets Building, 1425 Veterans Circle Dr., Yuba City

ROOT GROWTH DYNAMICS AND CONSTRAINTS ON ABOVE GROUND GROWTH AND YIELD IN WALNUTS

High Tunnel Tomato Production Horticulture and Armstrong Farms 2007

California Pistachio Research Board. Workgroup/Department: Pistachio Work Group / Plant Sciences Department at UC Davis

Integration of Tree Spacing, Pruning and Rootstock Selection for Efficient Almond Production

Pruning Ornamental and Fruit Trees

Cooperative Extension, University of California FRUIT & NUT NOTES

2007 North San Joaquin Winegrape Seminar

Acidic, sandy soils where leaching with low salt irrigation water occurs may exhibit Zn as well as B deficiencies.

Sweet Cherry Rootstock Traits Lynn E. Long, Oregon State University

Sacramento Valley Walnut News

Pistachio rootstocks. Elizabeth J. Fichtner Farm Advisor: nuts, prunes, olives UCCE Tulare and Kings Counties

Vineyard Irrigation with a Limited Supply of Water. Glenn McGourty UCCE Mendocino and Lake Counties

Steps in the Solution of Avocado Problems

UPDATE ON CHERRY ROOTSTOCKS

Crop Management Details Start from Parameters settings Emergence Planting Seed brand: Settings Parameter settings Hybrid-specific Generic

July-August 2007 Volume 13 / NO. 7. Walnut Rootstock Clones. page 4. PACIFIC NUT PRODUCER / July-August 2007

FRUIT AND NUT NOTES SACRAMENTO VALLEY REGIONAL WALNUT NEWSLETTER

Optimizing Cherry Production: Physiology-Based Management. Gregory Lang Michigan State University

High Tunnel Bramble Production

Evaluation of Pistachio Breeding Selections Annual Full Report

Pruning is one of the oldest

Light Management in Pecan Orchard in Semi-Arid Regions. Jim Walworth, University of Arizona & Richard Heerema, New Mexico State University

CLONAL PROPAGATION OF WALNUT ROOTSTOCK GENOTYPES FOR GENETIC IMPROVEMENT

Asparagus Response to Water and Nitrogen

Fruit Production in Utah

D. A. Goldhamer,R. Beede,S. Sibbett, E. Fereres, T. M. DeJong, D. Ramos,D. Katayama,J. Doyle, and K. Day

Managing Orchard Salinity During and After Drought. December 9, 2015

Dried Plum News Tulare County

Project Leaders Curt R. Rom University of Arkansas Dept of Horticulture 316 PTSC, Fayetteville AR

Sacramento Valley Walnut News

Dani Lightle UC Orchard Systems Glenn County Advisor Office: (530) Mobile: (530) Text messages ok-

CLASS NOTES ON WATERING YOUR VEGETABLE GARDEN

Avocado Tree Pruning in Chile

Deciduous Fruit Trees Fall & Winter Care

Fruit Production in Utah

Who Are We? Today s Topics for Discussion. Our Berry Farm. Why Do We Grow Berries? Our Options. Growing Berries in Northern Nevada, 2/20/2014

ANR NONDISCRIMINATION AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY STATEMENT:

Home Orchard Care for Master Gardeners. Jeff Schalau Associate Agent, ANR University of Arizona Cooperative Extension, Yavapai County

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums 1

Introduction. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences North Florida Research and Education Center Suwannee Valley

Salinity Management in Alfalfa Fields

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums 1

EVALUATION OF RELATIVE RESISTANCE OF DIFFERENT STRAWBERRY CULTIVARS TO PHYTOPHTHORA

Watering Your Landscape

Intensive Orchard Systems for High Quality, High Efficiency Sweet Cherry Production

Transcription:

Irrigation Management in Walnut Allan Fulton, Farm Advisor UC Cooperative Extension Tehama, Glenn, Colusa, and Shasta Counties aefulton@ucdavis.edu

Acknowledgements Locally: Crain Ranch Rick Buchner Cayle Little Cyndi Gilles Lisa Humphries Scott Spinner Lisa Miller Becky Bianchi Steve Cheyne UC Davis: Bruce Lampinen Ken Shackel Sam Metcalf UCCE: Larry Schwankl Terry Prichard Joe Grant Funding: Walnut Marketing Board

Topics: Walnut response to irrigation Time permitting An irrigation management reminder

General strategy for evaluating water stress in walnut field trial Crop Development Stage 3.5 ac-ft/ac 2.4 ac-ft/ac 1.9 ac-ft/ac Root Growth (Feb/Mar) Low Low Low Bloom (Apr) Low Low Low Shoot Growth (Apr/May) Low Low Low Fruit Sizing (May/June) Low Mild Mild Kernel Development (Jul/Aug) Low Mild Moderate Bud Development (July/Aug) Low Mild Moderate Root Growth (Aug/Sept) Low Mild Moderate Post-harvest (Oct/Nov) Low Moderate Moderate Range in Midday SWP (bars) -3 to -7-3 to -10-3 to -12 Range in Soil Water Tension -20 to -80 cb -20 to -200 cb -20 to -200 cb

Irrigation Effect on Shoot Growth

Effect of irrigation on shoot growth of bearing Chandler Walnut on Paradox, 2002-2003 Two-year Average Applied Water (ac-ft/ac) Average Seasonal Shoot Growth * (feet per season) 3.5 (low stress) 3.5 a 2.4 (mild stress) 3.3 a 2.0 (moderate) 2.4 b * Average of about 64 pruned Shoots per irrigation level

Walnut Response to Irrigation 1. Water stress is likely to decrease shoot growth.

Effect of Irrigation on Fruitfulness and Yield

Effect of water stress on bud break and bloom, Chandler walnut grown on Paradox rootstock, 2004. Applied Water 3.6 acft/ac 2.2 acft/ac 1.9 acft/ac Reduction in buds that opened (%) Reduction in floral buds (%) Reduction of flowers per floral bud (%) Reduction in nut load (%) 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a -1 a -18 b -3 a - 24 b -12 b -12 b -9 b - 31 b Remember Shoot Growth

Effect of irrigation on dry in-shell yield of Chandler walnut on Paradox Rootstock, 2002 2005. Year Applied Water (ac-ft/ac) Yield (lbs/acre) Percent less Yield 2004 3.6 (low) 5046 a ----- 2.2 (mild) 3770 b 25 1.9 (mod) 3068 c 39 Four-Year Total 3.5 (low) 21,508 a ----- 2.4 (mild) 18,066 b 16 2.0 (mod) 15,737 c 27

Effect of irrigation on dry in-shell yield of Chandler walnut on NCB Rootstock, 2002 2005. Year Applied Water (ac-ft/ac) Yield (lbs/acre) Percent less Yield 2004 3.6 (low) 3614 a ----- 2.2 (mild) 2586 b 28 1.9 (mod) 2044 c 43 Four-Year Total 3.5 (low) 14,323 a ----- 2.4 (mild) 11,248 b 21 2.0 (mod) 10,007 b 30

Walnut Response to Irrigation 1. Water stress is likely to decrease shoot growth. 2. Crop water stress can reduce the number of buds that open and that are fruitful. Results in less nut load and near 40 percent less yield in some situations.

Chandler Walnut Yield Response to Increased Irrigation, Paradox Rootstock, 2006 2007. Year Applied Water (ac-ft/ac) Yield (lbs/acre) Four-Year Total 3.5 (low) 21,508 a (2002 2005) 2.4 (mild) 18,066 b 1.9 (mod) 15,737 c 2006 3.1 (low) 5253 a 3.1 (mild) 5529 a 3.1 (mod) 5132 a 2007 3.3 (low) 6867 a 3.3 (mild) 6038 a 3.3 (mod) 6134 a

Chandler Walnut Yield Response to Increased Irrigation, NCB Rootstock, 2006-2007 Year Applied Water (ac-ft/ac) Yield (lbs/acre) Four-Year Total 3.5 (low) 14,323 a (2002 2005) 2.4 (mild) 11,248 b 1.9 (mod) 10,007 b 2006 3.1 (low) 4513 a 3.1 (mild) 3564 a 3.1 (mod) 4001 a 2007 3.3 (low) 4994 a 3.3 (mild) 4730 a 3.3 (mod) 4216 a

Walnut Response to Irrigation 1. Water stress is likely to decrease shoot growth. 2. Crop water stress can reduce the number of buds that open and that are fruitful. Results in less nut load and near 40 percent less yield in some situations. 3. Irrigation effects on walnut yield may carry over one or more years after water stress is corrected.

Effect of Irrigation on Walnut Quality

Effect of irrigation on quality of Chandler Walnut grown on Paradox Rootstock Year Applied Water (ac-ft/acre) Relative Value 1 $/1000 lbs 2003 3.7 (low) 1116.75 a 2.2 (mild) 1012.33 b 1.8 (mod) 959.35 c Four-Year Average 3.5 (low) 972.60 a 2.4 (mild) 927.32 b 2.0 (mod) 922.95 b 1 Darker kernel color and higher off-grade main quality parameters affecting walnut value. Significant differences 3 out of 4 years.

Walnut Response to Irrigation 1. Water stress is likely to decrease shoot growth. 2. Crop water stress can reduce the number of buds that open and that are fruitful. Results in less nut load and near 40 percent less yield in some situations. 3. Irrigation effects on walnut yield may carry over one or more years after water stress is corrected. 4. Irrigation management may influence walnut value. Darker kernel color and higher off-grade can be more common in water stressed trees.

Importance to Rootstock Performance

Effect of irrigation on performance of Paradox and Northern California Black Rootstock, 2002 2005 Rootstock Four-year Average Applied Water (ac-ft/ac) Four-year Total Dry Inshell Yield (lbs/acre) Paradox 3.5 (low) 21,508 a Paradox 2.4 (mild) 18,066 b Paradox 2.0 (mod) 15,737 c Black 3.5 (low) 14,323 c Black 2.4 (mild) 11,248 d Black 2.0 (mod) 10,007 d

Walnut Response to Irrigation 1. Water stress is likely to decrease shoot growth. 2. Crop water stress can reduce the number of buds that open and that are fruitful. Results in less nut load and near 40 percent less yield in some situations. 3. Irrigation effects on walnut yield may carry over one or more years after water stress is corrected. 4. Irrigation management may influence walnut value. Darker kernel color and higher off-grade can be more common in water stressed trees. 5. If mismanaged, irrigation can negate investments in other walnut culture i.e. hybrid rootstock, etc

Irrigation, Crown Rot, and Tree Longevity

Effect of irrigation on longevity of trees grown on Paradox and Northern California Black Rootstocks Rootstock Average Applied Water (ac-ft/ac) Percentage trees in severe decline Paradox 3.5 0.0 Paradox 2.4 1.3 Paradox 1.9 1.3 Black 3.5 24.2 a Black 2.4 3.0 b Black 1.9 0.0 b

Walnut Response to Irrigation 1. Water stress is likely to decrease shoot growth. 2. Crop water stress can reduce the number of buds that open and that are fruitful. Results in less nut load and near 40 percent less yield in some situations. 3. Irrigation effects on walnut yield may carry over one or more years after water stress is corrected. 4. Irrigation management may influence walnut value. Darker kernel color and higher off-grade can be more common in water stressed trees. 5. If mismanaged, irrigation can negate investments in other walnut culture i.e. hybrid rootstock, etc 6. Tree loss on Paradox rootstock was not influenced by irrigation. Tree loss on Black rootstock increased significantly with more intense irrigation.

Irrigation, Crown Rot, and Tree Longevity

Effect of Irrigation on Tree Longevity Crown Rot

Walnut Response to Irrigation 1. Water stress is likely to decrease shoot growth. 2. Crop water stress can reduce the number of buds that open and that are fruitful. Results in less nut load and over 40 percent less yield in some seasons. 3. Irrigation effects on walnut yield may carry over one or more years after water stress is corrected. 4. Irrigation management may influence walnut value. Darker kernel color and higher off-grade can be more common in water stressed trees. 5. If mismanaged, irrigation can negate investments in other walnut culture i.e. hybrid rootstock, etc 6. Tree loss on Paradox rootstock was not influenced by irrigation. Tree loss on Black rootstock increased significantly with more intense irrigation. 7. Cutting back on irrigation reduced tree loss on Black rootstock but at the expense of walnut yield and quality. Possibly some practices affecting water placement such as stream splitters might address problem.

Topics: Walnut response to irrigation An irrigation management reminder

THANK YOU! Walnut Day weed control.ppt

Happy Valley Times Anderson Valley Post Red Bluff Daily News Corning Observer Orland Press-Register Chico Enterprise Record Willows Journal Colusa County Sun Herald Newspaper Distribution http://cetehama.ucdavis.edu Web Distribution Irrigation and Water Resources Page Irrigation Scheduling Tools Menu Item

If hourly irrigation rate = 0.05 inches per hour 2.09 inches weekly use 0.05 inch/hr = 42 hours Then, estimated hours of weekly irrigation run time = 42 hours during week of July 20 26, 2007 * May add hours in consideration of Irrigation Uniformity

Irrigation application rate is unknown? OPTIONS: Contact Tehama County RCD Mobile Irrigation Lab 527-3101 x 119 Estimate it yourself based upon irrigation system design

Make your own estimate of hourly irrigation rate Example: 81 microsprinklers per acre 16.8 gph emission per sprinkler 81 x 16.8 gph = 1358 gph per acre 1358 27,154 = 0.05 inch/hr Conversion factor from gph per acre to inches per acre per hour

THANK YOU! Walnut Day weed control.ppt