TRIPR FLAMMABLE LIQUID UNIT TRAINS

Similar documents
Emergency Planning and Release Reporting. Farmington Hills Fire Department James Neufeld

Answer: B Objective: NFPA 472, (c), 4.2.3, 5.2.3(1); Level: Awareness, Operations Subject: Introduction; Chapter 1; Page 5

Structural Firefighting Policy

FIREFIGHTER II MANIPULATIVE SKILL OBJECTIVES

Chapter 5. Multiple Choice

Essentials of Fire Fighting, Fourth Edition Transition Guide. Chapter 1: The History of the Fire Service (Essentials, Chapter 1)

SUBJECT FIRE OPERATIONS GUIDELINE (F.O.G.) #F510 Issued: 1/2014 Last Revision: 1/2014 Pages: 9 By Order Of: J.S. Thompson, Fire Chief

TITLE: Offensive and Defensive Operations

Prereq: FOD 131 or Instructor Permission

CLARK COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Prevention Bureau

Township Of Jackson, Fire District 3, Station 55 Standard Operating Guidelines FIRE GROUND STRATEGY

Rapid Intervention Team

Hazard Zone Locations: HAZARD ZONE CHECKLIST

Assignment Sheet Apply the NIMS-ICS Model to an Emergency Scene

Working With Emergency Response Agencies

Above Ground Fuel Tank Requirements

As agreed to by the members of the Routt County Multi-Agency Coordinating (MAC) Advisory and Policy Groups on March 15, 2018.

5.0 CONTINGENCY PLAN. It is necessary to amend the plan if:

Based on NFPA 1001: Standard for Fire Fighter Professional Qualifications, 2013 Edition.

Outline. Standards of Coverage. ICS Features 2/12/2016 ICS

Chapter 17 Test. Directions: Write the correct letter on the blank before each question.

CLARK COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Hazard & Prevention Services 575 E. Flamingo Road, Ls Vegas, NV (702) FAX (702)

SCALES NW EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN

Chapter 3 FF II Fire Department Communications

ASTM E Standard Practice for Radiological Response. ASTM E Standard Practice for Radiological Response

LABC Gas Well Incident City Council Report

Carbon Monoxide Poisoning

SAGINAW FIRE DEPARTMENT SAFER

NATIONAL COMPETENCY STANDARD

Foam Application for High Hazard Flammable Train (HHFT) Fires

... Williams Gas Pipeline

Environmental emergency preparedness and response

Deployment of IBP material caused by the sinking of a floating roof of large oil storage tank

FIRE PROTECTION BUREAU ACCREDITATION AND CERTIFICATION PO Box Olympia WA (360) FAX: (360) AIRPORT FIREFIGHTER

STANDARD OPERATING GUIDELINE Standard Response

1 Pre-Burn Plan Mandatory. 2 Pre-Burn Inspection Mandatory. 3 Pre-Burn Briefing Mandatory. 4 Instructor In Charge Mandatory

POSITION PAPER ON WATER MIST FOR FIRE FIGHTING APPLICATIONS

Citizens Gas Uncontrolled Well Head Leak

EASTERN ARIZONA COLLEGE Fire Department Operations II

ELEVATOR RESCUE PROCEDURE

Travis County Emergency Services District #1 Standard Operating Guidelines

FIRE PREVENTION PLAN EMERGENCY ACTION

WILLIAM HICKS. MSc, CFEI, CFPS, IAAI-CFI, MIFireE, EFO, CFOD, F-IAFI. Associate Professor Eastern Kentucky University

Fire Prevention Plan for Alter Hall 3743 Ledgewood Drive

SOUTHERN AFRICAN EMERGENCY SERVICES INSTITUTE NPC Registration No. 2014/162285/08. Interior Industrial Fire Brigade Member- NFPA 1081, 2007

INTERIOR FIRE BRIGADE MEMBER MANIPULATIVE SKILL OBJECTIVES GENERAL

Fire Prevention Plan for Campus Services Building 1630 Musketeer Drive

5.3.5 Personnel accountability. Performance Test. Overhead transparencies, overhead projector, TV/VCR, exercise

October 1, Full *2 Sprinkler System

FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM

Annex 2 - Shelter-in-Place

FIRE EMERGENCY POLICY

Emergency Action Plan. Emergency Response Plan. Emergency

3330 N Clayton. C - Side Date: 11/18/2017 Time: 21:48 Incident Number: Address: 3330 N Clayton

BP U.S. Pipelines and Logistics (USPL) Safety Manual Page 1 of 6

Emergency Action Fire Prevention Plan

MIT Emergency Response Guide

Emergency Evacuations What you need to know

Based on NFPA 1003: Standard for Airport Fire Fighter Professional Qualifications 2015 Edition

Fire Prevention Plan for Residence Life 1625 Musketeer Drive

ADVANCED EXTERIOR FIRE BRIGADE MEMBER MANIPULATIVE SKILL OBJECTIVES GENERAL

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTE EMERGENCY CONTINGENCY PLAN University of Southern Maine Portland Campus

Risk Management Services

SPEARFISH FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Fire Prevention Plan for St. Barbara Hall 3904 Winding Way

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SAFETY

Xavier Field Office Fire Prevention Plan. for. Xavier Field Office Dana Avenue

DEPARTMENTAL GUIDELINES CHAPTER 6 TACTICAL OPERATIONS

SANTA ROSA FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU INSPECTION CHECKLIST

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTE EMERGENCY CONTINGENCY PLAN University of Southern Maine Portland Campus

Enactment Date: Rapid Intervention Team and RIT Officer

Update on Company Emergency Response Team : Roles, Responsibilities & Requirements. MAJ THIYAGARAJAN RRS CERT Audit Team Leader HazMat Dept SCDF

Ref : NTU/OHS/SOP/06.2 Date of issue : 24 July Updated by : Wong Zhi Hao Next review date : 23 July 2014

ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL STORAGE & SPILL CONTINGENCY PLAN

ESCONDIDO FIRE DEPT TRAINING MANUAL Section Truck Module Page 1 of 5 High Rise On Scene Revised

Public Comment No. 3-NFPA [ Chapter 7 ]

CENTRAL STATE HOSPITAL PLAN SAFE USE HANDLING AND STORAGE OF FLAMMABLE AND COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS

Course Outline Cover Page

OUTLINE FOR FIRE PREVENTION ACTIVITY

DCN: ENGINE COMPANY OPERATIONS CHAPTER 4 March 15, 1997 FIRE SCENE OPERATIONS

ESCONDIDO FIRE DEPT TRAINING MANUAL Section Truck Module Page 1 of 6 Utilities Electrical Emergencies Revised

Firefighting operations on multi-tiered vehicle stacking buildings F5-13 GD

4 ESF 4 Firefighting

DEVELOPING RESPONSE TACTICS

HAZARDOUS WASTE CONTINGENCY PLAN

Fire Prevention Plan for Bellarmine Parish Center 3832 Ledgewood Avenue

ASBESTOS POLICY. 2. Authority. 3. Scope. 4. Definitions. 4. Responsibilities. 1. Purpose. Department supervisors

IMPLEMENTING RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE ANGELLALA CREEK AMMONIUM NITRATE VEHICLE EXPLOSION

Evacuation Procedures

Appendix 3 Fire Suppression Systems For AASA sanctioned events V0.1

Savard Labor & Marine Staffing, Inc. Fire Prevention Program Rev3/14

The University of Washington Nanofabrication Facility (WNF) at Fluke Hall 125 Fluke Hall Seattle, WA 98195

TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 6 Legal Basis for Fire Safety Planning... 2

4.13 Security and System Safety

I. It shall be the responsibility of the department officers to implement this operating guideline.

A Guide for Meeting NFPA 10 Subsection

SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PLAN

BNSF Rail Safety Overview

polyurethane & polyisocyanurate foam Six Steps for

Firefighters Support Foundation. v1 1

Transcription:

CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE TRIPR FLAMMABLE LIQUID UNIT TRAINS 7.0 SELECT AND IMPLEMENT RESPONSE OBJECTIVES v

CLICK TO OBJECTIVES EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE Outline incident management principles and critical size-up questions responders will need to consider when identifying response objectives for a rail incident involving Hazard Class 3 flammable liquids such as ethanol and crude oil. Review considerations in determining the response strategies and modes of operation (i.e., offensive, defensive or non-intervention) for rail incidents involving Hazard Class 3 flammable liquids such as ethanol and crude oil. List the potential response scenarios involving flammable liquid unit trains that may be encountered by emergency responders.

INITIAL CLICK TO RESPONSE EDIT MASTER OBJECTIVES TITLE STYLE Incident may be a complex event. Use the ERG for initial response guidance. Approach and manage as a Hazmat problem. Notify and request outside technical assistance and support early.

INITIAL CLICK TO RESPONSE EDIT MASTER OBJECTIVES TITLE STYLE Coordinate and communicate with: Railroad Shipper/Consignee Shipper s 24-hour emergency contact EPA USCG State Personnel Utilize Railroad Technical Specialists to assist with size-up and damage assessment process. State and Federal response officials may provide technical assistance prior to arrival on the scene.

INCIDENT CLICK TO MANAGEMENT EDIT MASTER PRINCIPLES TITLE STYLE Establish site management and control: Assume command and establish an Incident Command Post (ICP) Establish an initial isolation perimeter Establish initial hazard control zones Identify / verify the materials involved Size-up the problem Implement the local Emergency Operations Plan Establish a Unified Command Expand the ICS organization based upon the nature of the problem and amount / type of resources on-scene.

CRITICAL CLICK TO EDIT SIZE-UP MASTER QUESTIONS TITLE STYLE Are there any life threatening issues for the public, train crew or responders that must be immediately addressed? Can responders safely approach the incident? Do responders fully understand the nature and scope of the problem?

CRITICAL CLICK TO EDIT SIZE-UP MASTER QUESTIONS TITLE STYLE Determine what is happening: Has product been released? Is there fire involved? What type? Is the fire impinging on other tank cars? Is it a pressure fed fire? Are there breached tank cars with product burning inside of the container?

CRITICAL CLICK FACTORS EDIT & CONSIDERATIONS MASTER TITLE STYLE (FIRE) Do responders have immediate access to sufficient water supplies for cooling? Do responders have access to Class B foams and agents for effective vapor suppression or fire control operations? Can cooling water be effectively applied to any tank cars impacted by direct flame impingement? Can fire suppression agents be effectively applied to the tank car(s) and spill involved? Will extinguishment improve or worsen the incident? What is the environmental impact of doing so?

CRITICAL CLICK FACTORS EDIT & CONSIDERATIONS MASTER TITLE STYLE (FIRE) Potential Rail Car Failure: Heat Induced Tears DOT-111 tank cars involved with intense pool fires or torch fires are subject to container failure.

CRITICAL CLICK FACTORS EDIT & CONSIDERATIONS MASTER TITLE STYLE (SPILL) Determine what is happening: What is spilled and how much? Where is it going? How fast is it moving? What will it impact and when? What can we do about it? Keep it in the container Keep it to a small footprint as possible Keep it out of the water Minimize the spread of the product

CRITICAL CLICK FACTORS EDIT & CONSIDERATIONS MASTER TITLE STYLE (SPILL) Determine if there is spill control equipment readily available to: Protect the safety and health of people by securing the perimeter, eliminating ignition sources, and establishing air monitoring. Stop the source of a spill as quickly as possible. Minimize environmental and community impact by limiting the amount spilled and limiting the spread the spill.

OPERATIONAL CLICK TO EDIT MODES MASTER OF RESPONSE TITLE STYLE Operational Modes: Offensive, Defensive, Nonintervention The selected operational mode is based upon: Level of available resources. Level of emergency responder training and operational capabilities. Potential harm created by the incident.

CLICK OFFENSIVE TO EDIT RESPONSE MASTER MODE TITLE STYLE All available resources are committed to fire control objectives to control and extinguish the fire. Increases risk to responders. Rely on having sufficient water, Class B foam concentrate or extinguishing agents, and foam appliances available.

OFFENSIVE CLICK RESPONSE TO EDIT MASTER CONSIDERATIONS TITLE STYLE Derailment scenarios involving spill fires can be different and challenge the ability to achieve fire control Product may pool or flow away from the derailment Product may flow and be trapped in the rail bed ballast Railroad track structure, tank car position and other obstructions can impact foam application and effectiveness Foam effectiveness and recognition potential may be dependent on the ability to initially cool the tank car shells BEFORE foam application NFPA 11 foam calculations are based upon two-dimensional fire scenarios as compared to three dimensional fires seen in several incidents

OFFENSIVE CLICK RESPONSE TO EDIT MASTER CONSIDERATIONS TITLE STYLE Critical Questions: Do you have sufficient quantities of Class B foam concentrate, water, and application devices? Do you have trained personnel capable of initiating and sustaining Class B foam operations? Can you maintain the integrity of the foam blanket?

CLICK DEFENSIVE TO EDIT RESPONSE MASTER MODE TITLE STYLE Commit response resources to less aggressive response objectives to limit the overall size or spread of the problem. Protect exposures and ensure the incident does not spread. Expose responders to less risk than offensive operations.

DEFENSIVE CLICK TO MODE EDIT MASTER CONSIDERATIONS TITLE STYLE Critical Questions: Are there any life safety exposures in danger? Do responders have immediate access to sufficient foam and water supplies for effective fire control/suppression operations? What are the impacts to the environment?

NON-INTERVENTION CLICK TO EDIT MASTER RESPONSE TITLE MODE STYLE Taking no action other than isolating the area. Allow flammable liquids to burn until the bulk of the product has been consumed by the fire. Railroad responders and fire fighting contractors can determine when to extinguish the remaining fires.

NON-INTERVENTION CLICK TO EDIT MASTER CONSIDERATIONS TITLE STYLE Critical Questions: Are there critical exposures nearby? Do you have the resources to extinguish or control the fire? Will extinguishing the fire improve or worsen the incident? Can responders safely approach the incident? Do responders fully understand the nature and scope of the problem?

LESSONS CLICK LEARNED TO EDIT & MASTER RESPONDER TITLE TIPS STYLE The goal of every responder should be to favorably change or influence the outcome of the incident. If you can t change the outcome safely then consider nonintervention. Air monitoring is an integral part of site safety operations and a cornerstone of a risk-based response philosophy.

CLICK TO EDIT SUMMARY MASTER TITLE STYLE In this module we presented the following information: Incident management principles and critical size-up questions responders will need to consider when identifying response objectives for a rail incident involving Hazard Class 3 flammable liquids such as ethanol and crude oil. Considerations in determining the response strategies and modes of operation (i.e., offensive, defensive or non-intervention) for rail incidents involving Hazard Class 3 flammable liquids such as ethanol and crude oil. The potential response scenarios involving flammable liquid unit trains that may be encountered by emergency responders.