A Preliminary Report on Asparagus Harvest Duration

Similar documents
Asparagus Response to Water and Nitrogen

Effect of Method of Application of Double Superphosphate on the Yield and Phosphorus Uptake by Sugar Beets 1

Asparagus investigations in south Louisiana

POTATO VARIETY RESPONSE TO PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER

Vegetable Report 1 from Experiment Station, HARC December 1998

Lesco Fertilizer Evaluation

Effect of Five Planting Dates on Yield of Six Sweet Onions

Project Report ROOT GROWTH DURING SOD TRANSPLANTING. Bingru Huang, Associate professor

Sugarbeets Enjoy Warm Winter

Hawaii Agriculture Research Center -1- Vegetable Report 2. Hawaii Agriculture Research Center Vegetable Report 2 January 2000

Vegetarian Newsletter

Quantifying Limitations to Balanced Cropping

HealthyGro Fertilizer Trials

Soil moisture extraction and physiological wilting of cotton on Mississippi River alluvial soils

Asparagus Year-Round IPM Program Annual Checklist (9/11)

Temperature and Dose influence Phoma macrostoma efficacy on seedling broadleaf weeds.

Annuals and Perennials. Ursula Schuch School of Plant Sciences University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

Evaluation of Foliar Insecticide Approaches for Aphid Management in Head Lettuce

AL TERNA TE BEARING OF CITRUS IN FLORmA

'HICKSII' YEWS AS A SUSTAINABLE SOURCE OF ANTICANCER COMPOUNDS

Finding the Balance: Calcined Clay Rate Effects in Pine Bark Substrates

Effects of Fall Fertilization on Frost Hardiness of Azaleas

General Principles. Figure 1. Nitrogen uptake pattern for winter wheat grown in the Coastal Plain region of Virginia.

Managing Phosphorus to Optimize Potato Tuber Yield in the San Luis Valley

Effects of Adjusting Night Temperatures on Growth

California Avocado Society 1960 Yearbook 44: NITROGEN FERTILIZATION OF THE MacARTHUR AVOCADO

Section 5: Vegetables and Bulbs

Monopotassium Phosphate-Based Starter Fertilizers Enhance Snapbean Yield in Florida George J. Hochmuth 1

Timing Kerb Applications in Lettuce

FERTILIZER, IRRIGATION STUDIES ON AVOCADOS AND LIMES ON THE ROCKDALE SOILS OF THE HOMESTEAD AREA

Effects of Pre-chilling and Pre- and Post-budbreak Temperature on the Subsequent Growth and Cut-flower Quality of Forced Tree Peony

EC Growing Asparagus, Rhubarb and Horseradish in Nebraska Gardens

EFFECTS OF SALINITY ON GROWTH AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS OF 'HASS' AVOCADO ON THREE ROOTSTOCKS.

Raspberries have an exceptionally. Raspberries: A New Greenhouse Crop. A New Greenhouse Crop. crop cultivation. By Meriam Karlsson and Jeffrey Werner

Responses of Primocane Blackberries to Varying Mow-down and Tipping Regimes. Mark Gaskell, Farm Advisor San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties

Utilization of Phosphorus From Various Fertilizer Materials By Sugar Beets in Colorado 1

Evaluating Suitable Tomato Cultivars for Early Season High Tunnel Production in the Central Great Plains

Campanula Champion and Champion Pro. Plugs and Production

Introduction. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences North Florida Research and Education Center Suwannee Valley

Effect of Nitrogen and Potassium on Growth and Development of Curcuma alismatifolia Gagnep.

GROWTH AND PERFORMANCE OF OWN-ROOTED CHANDLER AND VINA COMPARED TO PARADOX ROOTED TREES

Hybrid Seed Carrot. (Central Oregon) J. Hart and M. Butler. Yield, growth, and nutrient accumulation. NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT EM 8879-E November 2004

Imperial County Agricultural Briefs

BRAMBLES RASPBERRIES, BLACKBERRIES, & TISSUE CULTURE PLANTS

Controlled Release Container Nursery Fertilizer Evaluations. Dr. James T. Midcap

The Dutch Potato Report 2016 With Micosat mycorrhizae, fungi and bacteria

THE EFFECTS OF HUMATE AND ORGANIC FERTILIZER ON ESTABLISHMENT AND NUTRITION OF CREEPING BENT PUTTING GREENS

Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis) is a

CHAPTER 4 EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE AND SOIL MOISTURE CONTENT ON CUTTING ESTABLISHMENT

Strawberry Star Caladium A Spotted, Fancy-Leaved Variety for Use in Containers and Landscapes 1

gardens Growing Asparagus

SHADING AND PERIODIC REPLACEMENT OF NUTRIENT SOLUTION IMPROVE PRODUCTION OF HYDROPONICALLY-GROWN WATERCRESS

A&L Canada Laboratories Inc.

Further Evaluation of Biological Control Agents for Verticillium Wilt in Peppermint. Sai Sree Uppala, Bo Ming Wu, Mark Hagman and Jim Cloud

Unit B: Establishing a Fruit Garden. Lesson 3: Growing and Maintaining Small Fruits

Homeowner s Guide to Basic Landscape Care in Colorado

Managing Phosphorus Fertilization of Citrus using Soil Testing 1

Timing of Collection and Seed Source Affects Rooting of White Fir Stem Cuttings 1

Use Rooting Hormones, or Not? Multiple Applications May Be Best

Fertilization, Soils and Cultural Practices EFFECTS OF FLOODING ON SUGARCANE GROWTH. 2. BENEFITS DURING SUBSEQUENT DROUGHT

Eliminating Alternate Bearing of the Hass Avocado

Getting Started with Your Vegetable Garden

Alternate Irrigation of Avocados: Effects on Growth, Cropping, and Control of Rosellinia Necatrix

DROUGHT STRESS ON TURF. By R. E. Schmidt Associate Professor of Agronomy Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

INTRODUCTION OF GRAFTING AS A NEW IPM TOOL IN ARIZONA MELON PRODUCTION

Project Leaders Curt R. Rom University of Arkansas Dept of Horticulture 316 PTSC, Fayetteville AR

Effects of Planting Date and Density on Tuber Production in Sandersonia aurantiaca

+id 1:;~ T. C. Juang and G. Uehara Taiwan Sugar Experiment Station Taiwan and Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station Honolulu, Hawaii

Pan-African Soybean Variety Trial Protocol Training. I

SOIL TEST HANDBOOK FOR GEORGIA

Growth and nutrient absorption of grapes as affected by soil aeration. I. With non-bearing Delaware grapes A. KOBAYASHI, K. IWASAKI and Y.

Research Progress Report Southern Region Small Fruit Consortium

Research Report Row Spacing Effect on Forage Sorghum Yield and Quality at Maricopa, AZ, 2015

IRRIGATION CONTROL IN SUGARCANE FIELD BASED ON NEUTRON PROBE MEASUREMENTS

Soil characteristics that influence nitrogen and water management

Paul Vossen University of California Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor. Dealing with Drought

Corn Nematode Sampling Guidelines from United Soils

How to Propagate Hybrid Hazelnuts by Mound Layering

CULTIVATION PRACTICES FOR COMPACTED SOILS. J. A. Murphy and P. E. Rieke Crop and Soil Sciences, M.S.U.

Seasonal soil moisture and nitrogen availability

Integration of Tree Spacing, Pruning and Rootstock Selection for Efficient Almond Production

Availability of Calcium, Magnesium and Sulphur and Their Uptake by Amaranthus as Influenced by Composts and Fertilizers

Vegetarian Newsletter

Potassium Fertigation In Highbush Blueberry Increases availability of K and other nutrietns in the root zone.

FUTURE ORCHARDS Crop Loading. Prepared by: John Wilton and Ross Wilson AGFIRST Nov 2007

Alpine Russet Management Recommendations Idaho

PERENNIAL RYEGRASS & KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS ATHLETIC FIELD RESPONSE TO NUTRILIFE AF-TREATED NITROGEN FERTILIZER: 2012 FIELD EVALUATION

Effects of Phosphorus and Calcium on Tuber Set, Yield, and Quality in Goldrush Potato

THE EFFECTS OF MINITUBER SIZE AND HARVEST DATE ON GERMINATION, TUBER SET, AND YIELD OF RUSSET BURBANK POTATOES. Steven R. James '

BANANA SOIL, CLIMATE, PLANTING, HIGH DENSITY PLANTING, NUTRIENT AND WATER MANAGEMENT, INTER CULTURAL SPECIAL OPERATIONS

ERADICATION OF THE WHITE ROT FUNGUS FROM INFESTED SOIL BY STIMULATION OF SCLEROTIA IN THE ABSENCE OF HOST CROPS.

Unit D: Fruit and Vegetable Crop Production. Lesson 3. Growing and Maintaining Small Fruits

FERTILITY MANAGEMENT FOR TOMATOES AND PEPPERS

Avocado sensitivity to salinity revisited Akko Experiment

IRRIGATION AND NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT IN TREE FRUIT PRODUCTION SYSTEMS.

Arnold Schumann, Kevin Hostler, Laura Waldo, Wije Bandaranayake (UF/IFAS, CREC) 2015 Fluid Forum February 17, 2015 Scottsdale, AZ

The Effects of Precooling Temperatures and Durations on Forcing of Lilium longiflorum, Nellie White

The goal of cranberry fertilization, as for any

CMG GardenNotes #711 Vegetable Gardens: Soil Management and Fertilization

Effect of Fruit Crop Load on Peach Root Growth

Transcription:

A Preliminary Report on Asparagus Harvest Duration Effects on Storage Carbohydrates and Yield John McGrady and Phil Tilt INTRODUCTION In the Yuma, Arizona, area, asparagus has surpassed broccoli as the third leading crop in acreage planted; in 1989 over 3,700 acres were in production. There have been several studies on the effects of the length of the cutting season on storage root carbohydrate levels and subsequent yield (1,3,4). Our objectives were 1) to establish the optimum length of cutting season in the desert southwest and, 2) to determine whether storage root carbohydrate levels might be useful predictors of subsequent yield. This current study has extra relevance due to the current interest in fall- harvested asparagus in southern and western states. One -year -old crowns of 'Mellowland Select' asparagus were planted 15 cm deep on May 21, 1986. The crowns were spaced 30 cm apart in a single row on 15.7cm beds to yield a population of 32,278 plants /ha. Plots were furrow irrigated as needed with Colorado River water containing approximately 800 ppm total dissolved salts. The soil is a Superstition sand, and a soil test indicated adequate or high levels of all nutrients except nitrogen; this was supplied as UN -32 at 168kg/ha in 1986 with 56kg /ha increments each succeeding year so that 336kg /ha was applied in the 1989 fern growing season. MATERIALS AND METHODS The fern was irrigated through October each year and then water shut off to induce senescence and dormancy. After drying, fern was either removed manually or burned. A heavy irrigation in late December or early January was the only irrigation until the completion of harvest; generally, cutting commenced in early February. Asparagus spears were harvested daily, trimmed to 23 cm and graded based on spear diameter. The intensity of cutting pressure was classified as a light, moderate or heavy depending on the duration of the harvest each year. The first year (1987) the crop was harvested for 0 (light), 2 (moderate), or 4 (heavy) weeks. The length of harvest was increased each year by two weeks within each harvest regime and the two week difference between harvest regimes was maintained; thus, in 1990 we shall harvest for 6, 8 and 10 weeks. There are six 15.3m -long beds per treatment with the three treatments arranged in a randomized complete block replicated four times. Storage roots were sampled by inserting a 6.8cm diameter steel core into the soil bed approximately 15cm from the crown center at three locations per plot. Only 2 randomly selected beds were used for root core samples each year. Samples were taken once /week during harvest and for two weeks following harvest and monthly thereafter. Storage root segments were dried at 98 C for 2h and an additional 46h at 70 C then ground in a Wiley Mill. Soluble carbohydrate were extracted from 250mg tissue, and total carbohydrates determined by a modified anthrone reagent method (2); concentrations were determined from a fructose standard curve with optical density measured at 620nm in a Bausch and Lomb Spectronic 20 spectrophotometer. 54

RESULTS There was no difference in the mean weight of spears for the 1987 and 1988 harvests in response to the three harvest treatments (Table 1). However, in 1989 both the light and heavy cutting pressure regimes resulted in spears weighing 2.0 and 15 grams less than those receiving moderate cutting pressure. For clarity of comparison the harvest season was broken down into early, mid or late harvest based on the established cutting regimes for the respective year. For the first and second years after planting there was no apparent cutting pressure effect on the number of spears produced by each plant (Table 2). In the third year fewer spears were produced early in the harvest season when the plants had been subjected to either light or heavy cutting pressure the previous two years. As expected, this reduction in mean spear weight and spears per plant is reflected in the marketable yield of the third harvest season (Table 3). From 587 to 670 fewer kg/ha were produced in the light and heavy cutting pressure treatment plots respectively. There are no significant differences in asparagus storage root carbohydrate levels for 1987 and 1988 but the 1989 data (not shown) indicate a response to the cutting pressure. There is a typical pattern of slowly declining levels of carbohydrates prior to and during harvest that is shared by all three cutting regimes. After cessation of harvest of each harvest regime there is a precipitous drop in level of fructans for three or four weeks as new fern is produced. Of significance in 1989, however, is the level of fructans before the beginning of harvest in January and again after fern has been reestablished in June. Both the light and heavy cutting pressure treatments have lower carbohydrate levels in the storage roots. It is possible that the lower carbohydrate levels may be due to lack of stimulation of bud production on the crowns in the lightly harvested plots and to carbohydrate reserve depletion in the storage roots of the heavily harvested plants due to overcutting. This may be the result of fewer spears, and consequently less fern, per plant and might indicate that the plants are in a stressed condition. Intense cutting pressure applied early in the life of the crop may result in reduced yields after only two or three years harvest, place additional stress on the plants, and contribute to asparagus decline and increased susceptibility to damage from Fusarium and European asparagus aphid. LITERATURE CITED 1. Benson, B. L. and J. E. Motes. 1982. Influence of harvesting asparagus the year following planting on subsequent spear yield and quality. HortSci 17 (5): 744-745. 2. Morris, D. L. 1948. Quantitative determination of carbohydrates with Dreywood's antrone reagent. Science 107: 254-255. 3. Shelton, D. R. and M. L. Lacy. 1980. Effect of harvest duration on yield and on depletion of storage carbohydrates in asparagus roots. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 105: 332-335. 4. Takatori, F. H., J. I. Stillman and F. D. Souther. 1970. Asparagus yields and plant vigor as influenced by time and duration of cutting. Cal. Agr. 24 (4): 8-10. 55

TABLE L Mean weight of marketable asparagus spears harvested for 0, 2 or 4 weeks in 1987, 2, 4 or 6 weeks in 1988 and 4, 6 or 8 weeks in 1989 in Yuma, Arizona. Planting * Light Moderate Heavy Spear weight (g) 1 14.1 15.0 2 19.6 19.9 19.2 3 17.8 19.8 18.3 * One -year -old crowns planted May 21, 1986. 56

TABLE 2. Number of asparagus spears per plant in early, midseason or late harvests when subjected to three successive years of light, moderate or heavy cutting pressure. Planting * Harvest Light Moderate Heavy Spears /plant (no.) Early 1.4 1.4 1 Mid 0.9 Late Early 2.0 1.9 1.9 2 Mid 2.8 2.8 Late 2.4 Early 4.4 5.3 3.9 Mid 3.5 2.7 Late 3.2 * One -year -old crowns planted May 21, 1986. 57

TABLE 3. Early, midseason or late marketable yield of 'Mellowland Select' asparagus subjected to three successive years of increasing light, moderate or heavy cutting. Planting Harvest Light Moderate Heavy Yield (Kg /ha) Early 460 451 1 Mid -- 344 Late -- Early 832 895 876 2 Mid 1268 1287 Late -- 1160 Early 1804 2391 1721 3 Mid 1682 1252 Late 1362 58