MPA Conservation Advice Coastal Partnership Network - 4th Nov 14. Jamie Davies Project Manager

Similar documents
PPS5: Planning for the Historic Environment

7. DOES THE PLAN OR PROJECT NEED AN APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT?

Wildlife and Planning Guidance: Neighbourhood Plans

Proposal to designate the Queen of Sweden Historic Marine Protected Area - Partial Business Regulatory Impact Assessment (BRIA)

Call for Proposals. Heritage, natural capital and ecosystem services: case studies. Project No: Date of Issue: Tuesday 14 th November 2017

Screening neighbourhood plans for strategic environmental assessment. A toolkit for neighbourhood planners

Wildlife and Planning Guidance: Local Plans

The UK National Radon Action Plan From Directive to Publication

Cotswolds AONB Landscape Strategy and Guidelines. June 2016

Statutory and Non-Statutory Designated Sites and Ecology

ROCHFORD LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK: Sustainability Appraisal/ Strategic Environmental Assessment. Rochford Core Strategy Preferred Options Document

TOPIC PAPER 2: Links to other sustainability tools

SHORELINE, FLOOD AND COASTAL DEFENCE MANAGEMENT PLANS

Aebhin Cawley (Scott Cawley Ltd.) Appropriate Assessment in Practice A Consultant s Perspective

The Moors at Arne Project, Managing Coastal Change

Ebbsfleet Development Corporation

Policy DM19: Development and Nature Conservation

Development of green infrastructure in EU regions Nature-based solutions delivering multiple benefits

Rhode Island Shoreline Change Special Area Management Plan

Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) Screening Determination. May 2017

CORRECTIONS WITHIN DESIGN MANUAL FOR ROADS AND BRIDGES AUGUST 2009

Natural Environment White Paper & new partnerships to deliver green infrastructure. Henry Smith, Project and Policy Assistant, TCPA

Neighbourhood Planning Local Green Spaces

volume 11 environmental assessment section 2 environmental impact assessment Part 7 ha 218/08

Appropriate Assessment in relation to County Donegal Draft Heritage Plan

Thank you for your letter of 26 June regarding the Committee s scrutiny of building regulations in Scotland.

INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND

Policy and Resources Committee 10 th October Green Infrastructure Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) Summary. Title

Great Easton Neighbourhood Plan Statement of Basic Conditions

Land Use Regional Planning in Alberta Collaborating with Stakeholders

3. Neighbourhood Plans and Strategic Environmental Assessment

Scottish Natural Heritage. Better places for people and nature

South West Nature Map - A Planners Guide

Marine Spatial Planning and the Historic Environment

EU nature directives & Natura 2000

Balcombe Neighbourhood Plan. Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening Report

Town of Cobourg Heritage Master Plan. Statutory Public Meeting

Scarborough Waterfront Project

Settlement Boundaries Methodology North Northumberland Coast Neighbourhood Plan (August 2016)

Variation No. 2 Introduction & Explanatory Document Variation made on 19th May 2014

Local Development Plan for Glasgow

Workshop on Area-based Management and Regional Cooperation for the Implementation of Ocean-related Sustainable Development Goals

South Worcestershire Development Plan. South Worcestershire Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document

Strategic Environmental Assessment Screening Report. Dublin Port Masterplan Review 2017

Pathway to 2020 Protected Areas Workshop for New Brunswick

for Biosphere Reserves

Guidance for Local Authorities on Implementing the Biodiversity Duty

Plumpton Neighbourhood Development Plan Revised Pre Submission Document - Regulation 14 Consultation

Local Development Scheme

Scotland s 2020 Biodiversity Challenge: Loch Lomond & The Trossachs National Park Authority Delivery Agreement

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT

Management Plan Review Strategic Environmental Assessment Environment Report Cotswolds AONB

CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY

BUSINESS PLAN CEN/TC 164 WATER SUPPLY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EUnetHTA The European network for Health Technology Assessment

Making Space for Nature A Leicester Case Study. Dr Helen O Brien Leicester City Council

North Somerset Council Local Development Framework

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES and TEN-T PROJECTS Key elements for a sustainable network development

Blue/Green Infrastructure Study Accomack County, VA

BLEWBURY NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN STATEMENT OF BASIC CONDITIONS

BOA s and planning. Vanessa Evans Planning and Policy Officer Kent Wildlife Trust

River Basin Management Plans & Spatial Planning in N.Ireland. A land use planner s perspective

SUDS: Innovation or a Tried and Tested Practice?

Cranfield University Masterplan

VCA Guidance Note. Contents

Enclosures Appendix 1: Draft Golders Green Station Planning Brief. Summary

The UK-MAB Urban Forum

Agenda 21. Arthur Lyon Dahl. Contents

Guidance for Public Authorities on Implementing the Biodiversity Duty

What now for home building?

COMMUNITY LED REGENERATION CURRENT & FUTURE INITIATIVES FRANK RALLINGS - UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON

Design, implementation and cost elements of Green Infrastructure projects

INCORPORATING ICM INTO REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS

1. There are several important factors when discussing climate change, which the RCEP needs to understand for this study:

BlueHealth Environmental Assessment Tool (BEAT):

The Surveillance Camera Code of Practice (PoFA Code) Time for Voluntary Adoption? Implications for owners and operators

Interact capitalisation plan July Summary. What is capitalisation in Interreg?

UK Government perspective on natural capital

Newcastle upon Tyne. Ub Urban development perspectives: Innovative strategies for sustainable planning

Circular L8/08 2 September Water Services Investment and Rural Water Programmes Protection of Natural Heritage and National Monuments

Enabling a resilient future: exploring the leadership and governance of urban design

TERMS OF REFERENCE MALASPINA COMPLEX COASTAL PLAN

Policy for management and protection of the coast

Environmental Report incorporating the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Screening Report and consultation responses

HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT SCOTLAND

Ref: A073350/SM/sm Date: 13 September 2013

OVERVIEW OF PLANNING POLICY AND PROCEDURE RELATING TO BIODIVERSITY IN ENGLAND

Fixing the Foundations Statement

MPAs, protection and sustainability of marine ecosystems

Table of Contents. 3. Name and Location of Natura 2000 sites Description of the Project or Plan 5

How keep.eu can be used? Baiba Liepa, Interact Programme

Preparing a Sustainable Tourism Strategy

volume 11 environmental assessment section 2 environmental impact assessment Part 2 ha 202/08 environmental impact assessment

Implementation Guidance for ISO 9001:2008

Sustainability. Calverton Neighbourhood Plan. SEA Screening Statement & HRA

Research to Support the Implementation. of the. European Landscape Convention in England. Contract No. PYT02/10/1.16. Final Report

Richard Lemon Spatial Project Manager. Biodiversity and Green Infrastructure

BUSINESS PLAN CEN/TC 250 STRUCTURAL EUROCODES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CDAC. Update: Downtown Dartmouth Update: CDAC July 25 th Motion

Green Infrastructure. IENE 2012 International Conference

Transcription:

MPA Conservation Advice Coastal Partnership Network - 4th Nov 14 Jamie Davies Project Manager Jamie.Davies@naturalengland.org.uk 0300 0602261

Overview 1. Why do we produce Conservation Advice? 2. What does Conservation Advice include? 3. Overview of the new approach we are taking 4. Timetable we are working to 5. Our aspirations for the future

Why do we have an MPA Conservation Advice Project? 1. Statutory responsibility to produce Regulation 35 Advice for SPAs & SACs: a. Conservation objectives b. provide Advice on Operations that may cause deterioration to the habitats or disturb the species 2. Ramsar Convention UK government policy to treat same as SPAs 3. Marine & Coastal Access Act (Section 127) we must provide advice when asked

Why do we have an MPA Conservation Advice Project? Habitats & Wildbirds Directive Implementation Review (Defra, 2012), EC guidance & stakeholder feedback 3 tests: 1.up-to-date 2.easily accessible 3.allows applicants to assess the impact of their proposed development against the conservation objectives for a site (i.e. quantified targets)

Conservation Advice - Why it matters 1. Conservation Objectives define what condition we want protected features to achieve (i.e. defines favourable condition ) 2. It communicates our understanding of current condition of the protected features 3. It identifies what activities features are sensitive too 4. It identifies the evidence that we have, our confidence in it, and where there are gaps

Why it matters Therefore it: 1. Informs pro-active management (e.g. fisheries/ recreational management measures) 2. Provides a framework for assessing development (e.g. determining LSE, AAs for Habitat Regulation Assessments) 3. Identifies where there are evidence gaps and informs our monitoring programme

What are we providing from March 2015? Each MPA will have a dedicated Conservation Advice page on GOV.UK that includes/links to: 1. Detailed guide (web page) Site overview High-level Conservation Objectives 2. Supplementary Advice (PDF) feature descriptions Seasonality tables when are protected species present? Supplementary Advice Tables expand on the high-level Conservation Objectives to describe what favourable condition is for each feature

What are we providing from March 2015? 4. Interactive maps of features/supporting habitats MAGIC websystem 5. Advice on Operations (PDF) Provides a direct link between the activities that a protected feature is sensitive to Justifications and references 6. Publication of draft Advice for ~47 sites 31 March 2015 Do we have the latest evidence? 7. Publication of final Advice 30 June 2015?

Out of scope Favourable condition tables: how condition will be monitored and assessed; Vulnerability assessments to inform the general management approach (sensitivity x exposure to activities): Responsibility of management authorities [with advice and support from Natural England].

What s new? High-level Conservation Objectives Kingmere MCZ, W Sussex The first conservation objective of the Zone is that, in relation to the protected habitats: so far as already in favourable condition, remain in such condition; and so far as not already in favourable condition, be brought into and remain in such condition. Favourable condition with respect to each protected habitat within the Zone means that: its extent is stable or increasing; its structure and function, its quality, and the composition of its characteristic biological communities are such as to ensure that it remains in a condition which is healthy and not deteriorating.

Detailed objectives - providing Supplementary Advice Tables that describe what favourable condition looks like Targets Features Attribute Supporting and/or explanatory notes Maintain the total extent (2644 hectares) of infralittoral rock and thin mixed sediment as defined on the conservation advice mapping document. Moderate energy infralittoral rock and thin mixed sediments Extent: extent of feature The current extent is used where there is no historical data. The total extent captures all the features where it is patchy. The extent of infralittoral rock and subtidal chalk is unlikely to change significantly over time unless as a result of anthropogenic activities, although the mixed sediment veneer on the infralittoral rock could vary. The subtidal chalk is in the form of distinctive outcrops Sources of site based evidence James et al., 2011; Clark, 2012; Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC), 2004; Balanced Seas, 2011; Ware and Kenny, 2011 Maintain the total extent (2 hectares) of subtidal chalk as defined on the conservation advice mapping document. Subtidal chalk

Advice on operations draft output

Maps

Timetable of Advice production FY 14/15 47 sites FY15/16 44 sites FY16/17 60 sites FY17/18 - XX sites (Advice for new MCZs & SPAs yet to be designated) Prioritised Advice production: National Strategic Infrastructure Projects (NSIPs), Defra s Top 40 Infrastructure Projects / City Deals features in unfavourable condition; risk of damage to protected features IFCA Article 6 work new MPAs with no existing conservation advice;

Summary Does the approach meet Government three key advice tests? 1. up-to-date Yes and aim for a process of constant review and update as evidence improves; 2. be easily accessible Yes available through web; 3. allow applicants to assess the impact of their proposed development against them Yes improved mapping, sensitivity and objectives will improve likely significant effect screening and appropriate assessment.

Challenges to the timetable 1. Resources: 50% of our team may be cut by April 2015 2. MCZ & SPA designation remains Defra s marine priority 3. Smarter guidance project and GOV.UK writing principles aim to ensure advice is easily understood for all users, clear and concise. a. Result: shorted, clearer Advice that identifies what it s for b. Implications: i. Not allowed to publish a glossary of terms ii. Not allowed to publish How to use MPA Conservation Advice document for users

Aspirations for the future Fully interactive web-platform that can be interrogated by feature, site or activity.

Questions