Low Impact Development in the Transportation Environment: Lessons Learned in North Carolina

Similar documents
Low Impact Development and Bioretention: Lessons Learned in North Carolina

Evaluating Urban Stormwater Retrofits in the SE US Coastal Plain

4.6. Low Impact and Retentive Grading

Bioretention. Matt Scharver Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District. #ProjectCleanLake

Map Reading 201: Where Does the Water Go?? Map Reading Map Reading 201. Interconnected Systems

Evaluating Low Impact Development Practices for Stormwater Management on an Industrial Site in Mississippi

Figure 1. Bioswale along roadside. Photo courtesy of CalTrans. Figure 2. Diagram of typical bioswale (adapted from UDFCD 1999)

Bioretention cell schematic key

Low Impact Development. Charlene LeBleu Auburn University Landscape Architecture (334)

Pollutant Removal Benefits

DEALING WITH STORM WATER MANAGEMENT

Appendices: Glossary. General Terms. Specific Terms. Low Impact Development Approaches Handbook

Green Street BMP Matrix

LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT FILTER STRIPS AND SWALES

Action Plan for Retrofitting Structural BMPs

Patrick E. Lindemann INGHAM COUNTY DRAIN COMMISSIONER. Towar Rain Garden Drains A Low-Impact Urban Retrofit

What is YOUR biggest challenge in stormwater control measure accounting/planning?

Kearney Post-Construction Stormwater Program

Monitoring Flow and Quality for Stormwater Control Measures

The Benefits and Challenges Associated with Green Infrastructure Practices

EROSION PREVENTION BMP SUGGESTED USES MATRIX

MDOT Stormwater BMPs: The Challenge of Design. Janeen McDermott, PE Dan DeVaun, PE

Moon Brook FRP BMP Summary Sheet. Ownership of Land where BMP is Located

FACT SHEET: Pervious Pavement with Infiltration

C-12. Dry Pond. Design Objective

12/14/2015. Annette Lucas, PE Sediment and Erosion Control Workshop December 10, Department of Environmental Quality

Beyond Rain Gardens Advancing the Use of Compost for Green Infrastructure, Low Impact Development, & Stormwater Management

Jill Stachura STORMWATER BMP AND STREAM RESTORATION IN A CITY PARK. October 2013 Southeast Stormwater Association Annual Conference, Charlotte, NC

Draft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for West Long Branch Borough, Monmouth County, New Jersey

Use of Best Management Practices

KENT COUNTY STORMWATER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT STORMWATER BMPs MAINTENANCE TASKS AND RESPONSIBILITIES GUIDANCE DOCUMENT BIO-RETENTION FACILITIES

Post Construction BMPs

Building Green: An Update on Atlanta's Green Infrastructure Approach

Table 4.7.1: Swales Potential Application and Storm Water Regulation

Stormwater Management Techniques WMPF LAND USE TRAINING INSTITUTE MARCH 14, 2018

Draft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for West New York, Hudson County, New Jersey

Appendix D - Technical Design Criteria for BMPs

The following general requirements will be met for all planter box installations:

Putting a LID on Stormwater Pollution. Michele Loudenback, RPES Stormwater Enforcement Water Quality Division

Old Mill Community Association Bioretention Facility

Bioretention and Permeable Pavement Maintenance

Lesson 2: Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs)

J. Paul Guyer, P.E., R.A.

Post-Construction BMPs

Lilburn, GA STORMWATER BMP AND STREAM RESTORATION IN A CITY PARK. July 2013 Jill Stachura

Attachment 2: Permeable Pavement Design Guidelines

Rainwater and Land Development Manual Bioretention Design Specification Updates. Jay Dorsey & John Mathews ODNR-DSWR June 18, 2014

Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for City of Vineland, Cumberland County, New Jersey

Selecting Appropriate Stormwater Control Measures for Your Development Project

Bioswales: A Guide to Low-Impact Development Design and Maintenance. Introduction and Compilation by: Leslie D. Bartsch And Jennifer S.

Green Roof Benefits. Green Roof Media Selection for the Minimization of Pollutant Loadings in Roof Runoff

Charles County, MD Low Impact Development (LID)/ Environmental Site Design (ESD) Ordinance & Design Manual

Draft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for Newark, Essex County, New Jersey Volume 2

Contents. Adapted/abbreviated from GSWMM Coastal Stormwater Supplement, August

Bioretention Designs to Meet Different Goals. Jay Dorsey & John Mathews ODNR-DSWR June 18, 2014

R1a: REINFORCED TURF TO REPLACE GRAVEL /GRASS PARKING ADJACENT TO SOUTH PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE.

Draft. Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for Dunellen Borough, Middlesex County, New Jersey

Reducing Runoff with Green Infrastructure. Lake George, NY May 5, 2011

Urban Stormwater Management

Tong Yu,* Xiangfei Li,** Miao Yu,* Yunxiu Liu,* Yan Zhang* * Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta ** Drainage

DCBP APPENDIX B Action Plan for Retrofitting Structural BMPs

Sustainable Stormwater Retrofit Best Practices

C.3 STORMWATER TECHNICAL GUIDANCE. Table of Contents. Glossary... viii. Chapter 1 Introduction/How to Use this Handbook

County of Prince Edward. Stormwater Management Plan. Agreement in lieu of a Stormwater Management Plan

4. CONCEPT PLAN DEVELOPMENT

JCCC Campus Stormwater Project: Retrofitting Yesterday s Parking Lots With Today s Best Management Practices

Huntington Stormwater Utility

Key elements : Filter Strips must be designed within parameters required by the Fort Wayne s Development Standards/Criteria Manual.

Grass Buffer T-1. Description. Site Selection. Designing for Maintenance

Chapter 1 Introduction

Introduction to Low Impact Development. Fred Milch. East Central Florida Regional Planning Council

understanding Bioretention Areas Fact Sheet green infastructure WHAT IT IS

Brian Friedlich, PE. Jeremiah Bergstrom, LLA

Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavement A Low Impact Development Tool Training for Developers

The use of low head weirs to. perennial streams with their floodplains:

A New Approach to LID We all know we don t want when it comes to urban streams

Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for Hampton Township, Sussex County, New Jersey

Going Green with the NYS Stormwater Design Standards

Draft. Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for Fair Haven, Monmouth County, New Jersey

Final Report: Appendix F. LID Driveway Retrofit at Ocean Spray Processing Facility, Middleboro Supporting Information


C-9. Level Spreader-Filter Strip (LS-FS)

Green Infrastructure Stormwater Management Options in an Ultra-Urban Redevelopment. Sandy Doyle-Ahern

4.5 City of Indianapolis Stormwater Green Infrastructure Guidance: Bioretention (rain gardens) Bioretention Fact Sheet Bioretention Technical Design

Development and Design of Cost-Effective, Real-Time Implementable Sediment and Contaminant Release Controls

Sustainable Site Development and Conservation Design Considerations for Stormwater Control

West Virginia Stormwater Management Manual: Methods.

VA DCR STORMWATER DESIGN SPECIFICATION NO. 11 WET SWALE. VERSION 2.0 January 1, 2013 SECTION 1: DESCRIPTION

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CODES ANALYSIS RICHLAND COUNTY, SC SITE PLANNING ROUNDTABLE

Green Infrastructure and Low-Impact Development Technologies

Impervious Cover Assessment for Salem City, Salem County, New Jersey

92 Minnesota Stormwater Manual

Low Impact Development (LID) and Bioretention Techniques

SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES Drainage Design Options for street right of ways.

Urban Water Management and Soils (ESRM 311 & SEFS 507)

Using Runoff Reduction Practices to Shrink the Water Quality Volume (WQv) September 18, 2018 Jay Dorsey

Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems. Diederik Rousseau Tineke Hooijmans

Slow it, Spread it, Sink it using Green Stormwater Infrastructure

CAPE ELIZABETH, MAINE TOWN CENTER STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE

WQ-07 INFILTRATION TRENCH

Transcription:

Low Impact Development in the Transportation Environment: Lessons Learned in North Carolina Ryan Winston, M.S., P.E. Extension Associate Biological and Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State University ODOT Stormwater Workshop Columbus, Ohio December 12, 2014

Appalachian State University

Presentation Outline Case Studies: Highway Runoff Treatment Bioretention Enhanced (bio)swales Check Dams Main Street SCMs Street retrofits Street tree stormwater filters Maintenance of Highway SCMs

NCDOT Bioretention Cells BR Cells with 3 ft+ deep ponding Grassed systems Plant health has Suffered 3.5 ft Benefit for peak flow reduction

Plant Health with Deep Ponding?

NCDOT Interchange Bioretention Cells

Carolina Stalite(Expanded Shale)

Stalite Expanded slate aggregate Fired in kiln at 2000 F, creates porous, lightweight, high strength material Used in ROW when structural support is needed (within clear recovery zone and in medians)

Other Swale Retrofits Check dams Wetland swales Underdrained or Bioswales Regenerative Stormwater Conveyance

Grassed vs. Wetland Swale Dry Swale Wetland Swale Grassy (sites A/D) Vegetated (sites B/C)

Study Site Locations

Swale TN Concentrations Winston et al. 2012, Journal of Environmental Engineering

Winston et al. 2012 Effluent Type Comparing Dry and Wetland Swales Nitrogen Concentrations Wetland- Swale B Wetland Swale C Dry Swale A Dry Swale D TN 1.22 1.15 1.65 1.62 TAN 0.07 0.09 0.14 0.14 ON 1.05 0.81 1.11 1.26

Some Wet(land) Swale Guidance

Manning s Roughness Coefficient (n) Liner n Grass/ Turf 0.030 Fully Vegetated Wetland Swale 0.070 Moderately Veg. Wetland 0.050 Swale http://www.humboldt.edu/geology/for_download/fl uvial/arcement_wsp_2339_netvers.pdf

What Else Can We do to Improve Performance? Check Dams!

Lake Taupo New Zealand

Fancy Check Dam to Improve Hydrology

Check Dam Material Metal Wood Grass Concrete

Staggeet al. (2012) Water Research Highway runoff study looking at swale performance w/ & w/o filter strips and check dams No Filter Strip (No-FS) site

Staggeet al. (2012) Water Research Highway runoff study looking at swale performance w/ & w/o filter strips and check dams Filter Strip (FS) site

Check Dam Retrofit Swales monitored from Nov 2004-May 2006 for total of 18 events Retrofitted with 2 sets of 3 ft wide Panicum Virgatum check dams. Each check dam had three rows 1 ft apart (2007-2009, 27 storms) Designated FS-CD and No-FS-CD

TSS Performance No significant improvement in TSS concentration with check dam Similar results observed for heavy metals

Phosphorus Performance Swales in this study showed little capability for decreasing total phosphorus (TP) levels Inclusion of a check dam had negligible effect on TP concentrations

Check Dam Hydraulic Performance For smallest and largest events no impact of check dams

Performance of CDs Varies By storm event size: Complete capture (smallest events) Reducing runoff volume (mid-size events) Negligible volume attenuation (largest events) Complete Capture 0 0.9 Runoff Reduced 0.9 1.3 Flow Conveyance 1.3 +

Check Dam Studies for NCDOT Two studies are ongoing: Standard rock check composed of class B riprap and #57 stone (Mango Creek) Straw wattle check dams (I-40) Incorporated virophos-amended check dams into study

Mango Creek Swale Monitoring Schematic Rock Check Dam #1 Inlet Sampling Point Rock Check Dam #2 Outlet Sampling Point Forebay

Mango Creek: Installation Before Retrofit After Retrofit

I-40 Swale Monitoring Schematic Inlet Sampling Point Middle Sampling Point Standard Wattle Check Dam #1 Road Runoff Sampling Point Outlet Sampling Point P-Sorb Media Standard Wattle Check Dam #2 P-Sorb Media Standard Wattle Check Dam #3

I-40 Swale: Check Dam Photos CD #2 May 2014 CD #1 CD #3

Mango Creek Post-Retrofit Data Constituent Median Inlet Median Outlet % Reduction (mg/l) (mg/l) TKN 0.49 0.85-73 NO 2,3 -N 0.17 0.36-111 TN 0.68 1.25-84 NH 3 -N 0.02 0.10-400 TP 0.10 0.15-50 TSS 55.5 23.6 57.4 Extremely low influent nutrient concentrations affected swale performance TSS reduction did improve slightly from 45.7% to 57.4%. Median effluent concentration pre- vs. post-retroft (25.5 vs. 23.6 mg/l) also improved

Bioswales Typically have an underdrain and designer soil media mix

Introducing Bioswales Ingvertsen et al. (2012). Journal of Environmental Quality

Bioswalesin Charlotte, NC

ARC Guidance for Bio-Swale

Brunswick County Bioswale Lockwoods Folly River TMDL for Bacteria and closed shellfishing waters

Outlet Structure High Flow Media Bioswale Concrete Channel

Construction of Bioswale

Construction of Bioswale

Construction of Bioswale

Construction of Bioswale

Construction of Bioswale

Construction of Bioswale

Design Specifications Parameter Value Drainage Area 1.83 ac % Impervious 44% Surface Storage Volume 500 ft3 Media Void Storage 800 ft3 Media Infiltration Rate 100 in/hr Underdrain Diameter 8 in

Design Specifications Bacterra-type media

Data Collection Through the end of November (2014), ten storm event samples have been collected 5 of 10 storms produced overflow (>1.5 RF) Typically 1-2 log reductions in indicator bacteria (fecal coliform and enterococcus) Complete monitoring in April 2015, full data analysis & final report

Enterococci Probability Plot Most Probable Number 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 Inlet Underdrain Overflow 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Cumulative Probability

Fecal coliform Probability Plot Most Probable Number 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Inlet Underdrain Overflow 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Cumulative Probability

Comparing Against Human Health Thresholds Geometric Mean Sampling Location enterococci (MPN/100 ml) fecal coliform (MPN/100 ml) IN 11258 1168 UD 3619 190 OF 5322 150 Swimming Limit 35 126

Future Research on Bioswales Look at nutrient/sediment load reduction on DOT right-of-ways Studies needed in Piedmont (tight soils) Difficult to cite other SCMs in the typical section Source: CALTRANS

Conclusions Wetland swales perform better for nutrient removal than dry swales Maintenance is key to prevent swales from eroding and forming head cuts Water quality studies to be completed in 2015 on check dams and bioswalesin NC Additional design guidance is expected from these studies