Preliminary Port Towns Sector Plan and Proposed Sectional Map Amendment March 2009

Similar documents
Subregion I. Proposed Sectional Map Amendment, August Preliminary Master Plan and

Branch Avenue Corridor

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

PRINCE. APPROVED Transit District Development Plan. and Transit District Overlay Zoning Map Amendment

Seabrook Lanham & VICINITY. March Approved Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment $9.00

Largo Town Center. Approved Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment. December 2013

Preliminary Transit District Development Plan and Proposed Transit District Overlay Zoning Map Amendment. March 2009

Henson Creek South Potomac Planning Area

RECOMMENDED GOALS, CONCEPTS, GUIDELINES PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAM

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND, SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL ORDER AFFIRMING PLANNING BOARD DECISION, WITH AMENDED CONDITIONS

Morgan Boulevard and Largo Town Center Metro Areas

ABSTRACT. Approved Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment for the Greenbelt Metro Area. The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND, SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL ORDER AFFIRMING PLANNING BOARD DECISION, WITH CONDITIONS

Comprehensive Blueprint for Our Future. Adopted 4/2/18

2010 Plan of Conservation and Development

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 2010 Legislative Session. Council Members Dernoga and Olson

master plan of highways bus rapid transit amendment

John M. Fleming Managing Director, Planning and City Planner. Old East Village Dundas Street Corridor Secondary Plan Draft Terms of Reference

Kenilworth Avenue and Town of Cheverly Industrial Study Briefing

FOUR MILE RUN VALLEY WORKING GROUP AND CHARGE

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

JANUARY 19, 2011 CENTRAL AVENUE-METRO BLUE LINE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMMUNITY FORUM

SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:

Resource Conservation Plan

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

WOODMONT TRIANGLE AMENDMENT TO THE SECTOR PLAN FOR THE BETHESDA CBD

ELK GROVE GENERAL PLAN VISION

Purpose of the Master Plan

Cumberland Comprehensive Plan Town Council adopted August 2003, State adopted June 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Plan Overview. Manhattan Area 2035 Reflections and Progress. Chapter 1: Introduction. Background

Laberge Group. Town of Coeymans. Draft Comprehensive Plan. Overview of Planning Process

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2040 LUP is a part of the Comprehensive Plan and carries the same legal authority. Economic Challenges

Foreword. Sincerely, Elizabeth M. Hewlett. Approved Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment for the Tuxedo Road/Arbor Street/Cheverly Metro Area

PSRC REVIEW REPORT & CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION

Purpose of the Master Plan

FOUR MILE RUN VALLEY WORKING GROUP AND CHARGE Adopted April 16, 2016 Amended July 19, 2016

Chapter 2: Vision, Goals and Strategies

Prepared by: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission. Approved by: The Montgomery County Council January 17, 2006

South Norfolk Municipal Facilities Study

Living in Albemarle County s Urban Places

Scope of Services. River Oaks Boulevard (SH 183) Corridor Master Plan

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 2017 Legislative Session

SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION. introduction

South of Eastern Strategic Direction Status Update

PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA OCTOBER

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA TRANSIT DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TRANSIT DISTRICT OVERLAY ZONE UPDATE

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George s County Planning Department Development Review Division

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

7Page 1 CLEMMONS COMMUNITY COMPASS 1 PLAN OVERVIEW

Receive recommendations from representatives of the Future Land Use Plan Advisory Committee regarding their review of the Land Use Element of the

Rappahannock- Rapidan Regional Commission

CHAPTER VIII Implementation

PREPARED FOR: PLATTEVIEW ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

S C O P E O F W O R K A P R I L

City Center Neighborhood Plan

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND, SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL ORDER AFFIRMING PLANNING BOARD DECISION (CORRECTED)

WELCOME. The Yonge-Eglinton area has experienced significant growth and change in the last decade.

North Fair Oaks Community Plan Summary and Information

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

Sector Plan. Planning Board Draft. montgomery county planning department The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

master plan of highways

Project Profile BAR HARBOR

I. INTRODUCTION. Project Background and Study Area

1INTRODUCTION. Purpose of the Truckee Railyard Master Plan

Approved Countywide Master Plan of Transportation. November 2009

Prepared by the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 8787 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, Maryland

Arlington, Virginia is a worldclass

Sewanee Village + Request for Builder/Developer Proposals

MacDonnell Heights Town Center

Welcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION

Parks Master Plan Implementation: Phase I Waterfront Use and Design REPORT #: September 7, 2016 File #

THAT the attached Terms of Reference for the Thornhill Centre Street Study be approved.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

TEMPLE MEDICAL & EDUCATION DISTRICT

Comprehensive Plan. Faribault, Minnesota. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Claybaugh Preservation Architecture Inc. Howard R. Green Company Bonz/REA

38 Queen s University Campus Master Plan Part 1

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

LAND USE AMENDMENT DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL CORE (WARD 7) MACLEOD TRAIL SE AND 5 AVENUE SE BYLAW 254D2017

Town of Peru Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary

Growth Management Planning in the Central Puget Sound Region. Today s Presentation. Puget Sound Region. New Partners for Smart Growth

This application has been applied for with support of an Outline Plan to provide the technical details for the site s development.

The transportation system in a community is an

A guide to preparing the land use element of a local comprehensive plan. Land Use. Resource guide

VILLAGE OF BOLTON HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

hermitage town center

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

Acknowledgments. City of East Peoria. City of Washington. Aldermen. Commissioners. Staff. Staff. Planning Consultant. David Mingus, Mayor

In surveys, Dallas residents say what they want to change most

The Five Components of the McLoughlin Area Plan

PART 1. Background to the Study. Avenue Study. The Danforth

Executive Summary. The Mebane CLP is not a regulatory document, but is intended to guide land development decisions. The plan includes:

Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG)

Atlanta BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study. Scoping Meeting August 2008

AGENDA 7:00 p.m. Welcome 7:15 p.m. Staff Presentation 7:45 p.m. Questions and Responses 8:00 p.m. Open House

Area Plans. September 18, 2012

Transcription:

Preliminary Port Towns Sector Plan and Proposed Sectional Map Amendment March 2009 BLADENSBURG u COLMAR MANOR u COTTAGE CITY u EDMONSTON The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George s County Planning Department www.mncppc.org/pgco i

The Maryland National Capital Park and Planning Commission Royce Hanson, Chairman Samuel J. Parker, Jr., Vice Chairman Officers Oscar Rodriguez, Executive Director Patricia Colihan Barney, Secretary-Treasurer Adrian R. Gardner, General Counsel The Maryland National Capital Park and Planning Commission is a bicounty agency, created by the General Assembly of Maryland in 1927. The Commission s geographic authority extends to the great majority of Montgomery and Prince George s Counties: the Maryland-Washington Regional District (M NCPPC planning jurisdiction) comprises 1,001 square miles, while the Metropolitan District (parks) comprises 919 square miles, in the two counties. The Commission has three major functions: The preparation, adoption, and, from time to time, amendment or extension of the General Plan for the physical development of the Maryland Washington Regional District; The acquisition, development, operation, and maintenance of a public park system; and In Prince George s County only, the operation of the entire county public recreation program. The Commission operates in each county through a Planning Board appointed by and responsible to the county government. All local plans, recommendations on zoning amendments, administration of subdivision regulations, and general administration of parks are responsibilities of the Planning Boards. The Prince George s County Department of Planning (M NCPPC): Our mission is to help preserve, protect and manage the county s resources by providing the highest quality planning services and growth management guidance and by facilitating effective intergovernmental and citizen involvement through education and technical assistance. Our vision is to be a model planning department of responsive and respected staff who provide superior planning and technical services and work cooperatively with decision makers, citizens and other agencies to continuously improve development quality and the environment and act as a catalyst for positive change. Prince George s County Planning Board Samuel J. Parker, Jr., Chairman Sylvester J. Vaughns, Vice Chairman Sarah Cavitt Jesse Clark John H. Squire Montgomery County Planning Board Royce Hanson, Chairman John M. Robinson, Vice Chairman Joseph Alfandre Jean B. Cryor Amy Presley ii

Prince George s County Jack B. Johnson, County Executive County Council The County Council has three main responsibilities in the planning process: (1) setting policy, (2) plan approval, and (3) plan implementation. Applicable policies are incorporated into area plans, functional plans, and the general plan. The Council, after holding a hearing on the plan adopted by the Planning Board, may approve the plan as adopted, approve the plan with amendments based on the public record, or disapprove the plan and return it to the Planning Board for revision. Implementation is primarily through adoption of the annual Capital Improvement Program, the annual Budget, the water and sewer plan, and adoption of zoning map amendments. Council Members Thomas E. Dernoga, 1st District, Council Vice Chair Will Campos, 2nd District Eric Olson, 3rd District Ingrid M. Turner, 4th District Andrea C. Harrison, 5th District Samuel H. Dean, 6th District, Camille Exum, 7th District Tony Knotts, 8th District Marilynn Bland, 9th District, Council Chairwoman Clerk of the Council Redis C. Floyd iii

iv

Table of contents Foreword... ix Plan Highlights...1I Introduction Plan Purpose.................................................................................. 3 Planning Area Boundary and Regional Setting.................................................. 3 Other Plans and Studies...3 Public Participation Program...8 Demographic Profile........................................................................... 9 Market Analysis...13 Development Pattern Element Vision Statement...17 Overall Sector Area........................................................................... 17 Port Towns Waterfront Character Area........................................................ 22 Bladensburg Road Gateway/Main Street Character Area....................................... 28 Edmonston Road Main Street Character Area.................................................. 33 Edmonston-North Workshop Character Area.................................................. 37 Annapolis Road Gateway Character Area...................................................... 41 Bladensburg Town Center Character Area..................................................... 45 Infrastructure Elements Environmental Infrastructure................................................................. 49 Transportation...59 Transit.................................................................................... 60 Roadway.................................................................................. 61 Trails...70 Public Facilities............................................................................... 77 Schools...77 Libraries.................................................................................. 80 Public Safety...80 Parks and Recreation......................................................................... 83 v

Community Development and Character Economic Development........................................................................ 87 Historic Preservation.......................................................................... 91 Community Health and Wellness.............................................................. 107 Fundamental Urban Design Principles...109 Implementation Introduction.................................................................................. 113 Revitalization Tools........................................................................... 119 Public Facilities Report...121 Sectional Map Amendment...131 Development District Standards Introduction.................................................................................. 151 Character Area Summary...151 Applicability of Standards and the Permit and Site Plan Review Process...153 Building and Site Standards Introduction.................................................................................. 161 Urban Space Standards...162 Street Type Specifications...162 Streetscape Standards........................................................................ 170 Squares and Civic Greens...171 Tree Lists...172 Building Envelope Standards...174 Kenilworth Avenue...197 Architectural Standards...198 Definitions........................................................................................ 201 Permitted Uses...207 Appendices I. Procedural Sequence Chart................................................................ 215 II. Guide to Zoning Categories...217 vi

Maps 1. Sector Plan Boundary......................................................................4 2. Regional Setting...5 3. Illustrative Framework Vision Plan....................................................... 19 4. Existing Land Use........................................................................ 20 5. Proposed Land Use... 21 6A. Port Towns Waterfront Character Area................................................... 25 6B. Port Towns Waterfront Character Area Visualization... 26 7A. Bladensburg Road Gateway/Main Street Character Area Part I............................ 30 7B. Bladensburg Road Gateway/Main Street Character Area Part II... 31 8A. Edmonston Road Main Street Character Area............................................. 35 8B. Edmonston Road Main Street Character Area Visualization... 36 9. Edmonston North Workshop Character Area... 39 10A. Annapolis Road Gateway Character Area................................................. 43 10B. Annapolis Road Gateway Character Area Visualization... 44 11. Bladensburg Road Town Center Character Area... 48 12. Green Infrastructure Network............................................................ 50 13. Transit... 64 14. Access and Circulation... 65 15A. Reconfigured Alt. US 1 and Annapolis Road... 66 15B. Reconfigured Alt. US 1 and Annapolis Road Cross Sections... 67 16A. Reconfigured Annapolis Road Intersection............................................... 68 16B. Reconfigured Annapolis Road Intersection Cross Sections................................ 69 17. Existing and Proposed Trails............................................................. 75 18. Pedestrian Circulation... 76 19. Existing and Proposed Public Facilities................................................... 82 20. Parks and Recreation... 85 21. Colmar Manor... 95 22. Cottage City... 97 23. Edmonston... 99 24. Bladensburg............................................................................ 104 25. Existing Zoning...135 26. Proposed Zoning........................................................................ 136 27. Bladensburg Road Gateway/Main Street Urban Design Plan...157 28. Annapolis Road Gateway Urban Design Plan............................................. 158 29. Edmonston North Workshop Urban Design Plan and Edmonoston Road Main Street Urban Design Plan...159 30. Port Towns Waterfront Urban Design Plan and Bladensburg Town Center Urban Design Plan....160 vii

Tables 1. Population and Households.................................................................9 2. Household Trends... 10 3. Household Income........................................................................ 10 4. Industrial Supply Characteristics.......................................................... 13 5. Office Supply Characteristics.............................................................. 13 6. Residential Supply Characteristics... 14 7. Retail Supply Characteristics.............................................................. 14 8. Hotel Supply Characteristics... 15 9. Entertainment Supply Characteristics..................................................... 16 10. Existing AADT, Daily Service Volumes, and Levels of Service................................ 62 11. Prince George s County Public Schools Within the Port Towns... 78 12. 3DI Ranking of Prince George s County Public Schools with Port Towns... 78 13. Projected School Enrollment and Capacity Needs.......................................... 79 14. Identified Historic Resources, Historic Sites, Documented Properties, and Surveyed Areas within the Port Towns Sector Plan Area... 93 15. Action and Phasing Plan...114 16. Public Facilities Cost Analysis and Estimates.............................................. 122 17. Cumulative Zoning Inventory............................................................. 134 viii

foreword The Prince George s County Planning Board is pleased to make available the Preliminary Port Towns Sector Plan and Proposed Sectional Map Amendment. The preliminary plan contains recommendations on future land uses and development for a new Port Towns destination center focused on the Anacostia waterfront that links the four Port Towns of Bladensburg, Colmar Manor, Cottage City, and Edmonston. Policy guidance for this plan came from the 2002 Prince George s County Approved General Plan. The plan is a continuation of the community efforts begun over a decade ago to encourage reinvestment and redevelopment in the Port Towns. The plan contains recommendations for future development within targeted areas of the Port Towns and development standards specifically tailored to meet the goals and objectives of the Port Towns. Community participation and input were vital to the development of this plan. Fourteen focus group meetings were held prior to a planning charrette process to provide the community with the opportunity to share visions and proffer feedback on planning issues. The pre-charrette held in April 2008 was an opportunity for key stakeholders to refine and define the issues and opportunities and begin developing the vision for the area. A six-day charrette was held in June 2008 to allow the community, along with the planners, designers, and elected officials, to craft a vision for the Port Towns. The results of these efforts were presented to the community on September 17, 2008. The Port Towns of Bladensburg, Colmar Manor, Cottage City, and Edmonston envision their communities as thriving with social and economic revitalization. Through collective thinking, these cities pioneered a plan to answer the needs of their communities enhancing quality of life. Today, the Port Towns are reviving their communities using their wealth of diversity and historic uniqueness to build an even stronger community for tomorrow s generation. We are continuing this effort countywide through an Envision Prince George s initiative to engage a broad cross section of stakeholders in developing a shared vision for the county s future direction and growth. We invite you to visit the Envision Prince George s web site at www.mncppc.org/envision to learn more about how to participate in this exciting initiative. On April 14, 2009, the District Council and the Planning Board will hold a joint public hearing on the preliminary sector plan. The Planning Board and the District Council appreciate the contributions of community members and stakeholders throughout the plan development phase and at the public hearing. We look forward to receiving your testimony at the public hearing. Sincerely, Samuel J. Parker, Jr., AICP Chairman Prince George s County Planning Board ix

x