SAMPLE DOCUMENT USE STATEMENT & COPYRIGHT NOTICE

Similar documents
SAMPLE DOCUMENT USE STATEMENT & COPYRIGHT NOTICE

Planning Commission. DATE: February 9, 2017

THE AUSTRALIA ICOMOS CHAR- TER FOR THE CONSERVATION OF PLACES OF CULTURAL SIGNIFI- CANCE (THE BURRA CHARTER)

HERITAGE POLICY...Safeguarding the Built Heritage. Conservation Plans. A Guide to the Preparation of Conservation Plans

11.1 INTRODUCTION. The characteristics of these areas are briefly discussed below.

Landscape Design Guidelines

The Burra Charter The Australia ICOMOS charter for the conservation of places

VILLAGE OF BOLTON HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

The Athens Charter for the Restoration of Historic Monuments

ICOMOS NEW ZEALAND CHARTER FOR THE CONSERVATION OF PLACES OF CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE

CITY OF DES MOINES LANDMARK REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Tuesday, June 13, 2017

Part A. District Overview. Thornhill-Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan 1

SUE ROSEN ASSOCIATES. Re: DA DA/485/2016. Thank you etc

Section IV. Impacts to Cultural Resources

TOWN OF AURORA ARCHITECTURAL SALVAGE PROGRAM GUIDE

Hendersonville Historic Preservation Commission Main Street Local Historic District Design Guidelines

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

City of Mahtomedi Park System Plan Public Hearing Draft: September 13, 2006

Cookham Parish Council s Response to The Draft Local Borough Plan

Purpose of the Master Plan

Chapter 6 cultural heritage

Incentive Zoning Regulations Florida Municipal City of Orlando

Town of Cobourg Heritage Master Plan. Statutory Public Meeting

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

Cotswolds AONB Landscape Strategy and Guidelines. June 2016

ICOMOS New Zealand Charter For The Conservation of Places Of Cultural Heritage Value

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Front Yard Terracing PLNHLC South 1200 East Meeting Date: August 7, 2014

Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo. Design Review Panel DRAFT REPORT

CEQA and Historic Preservation: A 360 Degree Review

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment

Purpose of the Master Plan

DATE ISSUED: March 12, 2014 REPORT NO: 101. Old Globe Way Improvements and San Diego Zoo Employee Parking Structure

Mr. Craig Young, Managing Principal Tidewater Capital 25 Taylor Street San Francisco, CA October 27, 2014

PARTF Scoring System for Grants

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL RFP PRESERVATION MASTER PLAN FOR THE ELAM MARTIN FARMSTEAD CITY OF WATERLOO RIM PARK TERMS OF REFERENCE

Thailand Charter on Cultural Heritage Management

CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES POLICIES

SUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA

TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND CONSERVATION PLANS GUIDE

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

City of Norwich Policy Regarding Monuments on City Property

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

Executive Summary and Introduction

ESTABLISH AN EFFICIENT TOWN CENTER

METHODOLOGY FOR IMPACT ASSESSMENT ON HERITAGE ASSETS IDENTIFICATION OF THE RECEPTOR ASSESSMENT OF THE RECEPTOR S IMPORTANCE

CHAPTER 21 NC-PUD NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL PUD DISTRICT

Yonge-Summerhill: Urban Square Design (Midtown)

HeritageCollectiveLLP

Existing Built Form By-Law (R1) Lot size 954 sq m, median 540 sq m, minimum Coverage 15%, median 35%, maximum Height 6.5m, maximum 9.

Personal Emergency Response (PERS) Verification and Notification Procedures

Gemma Delves Planning Officer City of London, Guildhall, PO Box 270, London, EC2P 2EJ 25 th April 2013

The Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (notified 30 September 2013)

CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE OF DESIGN GUIDELINES

Phase 1 : Understanding the Campus Context. Phase 2 : APPROACHES - Alternates & Preferred Plan

Plan for Restoration of the Cottage

June 7, Mr. Brian. 150 North. Third Streett. Foote. On behalf. Master Plan Project. Disney Studios. I. Final EXHIBIT Q-1

CITY CLERK. Parkland Acquisition Strategic Directions Report (All Wards)

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

BRITISH ACCREDITATION COUNCIL INSPECTION REPORT. INTERIM VISIT (Short Course Provider)

Garden District Heritage Conservation District Study

July 12, Columbus City Council City Hall 90 West Broad Street Columbus, OH RE: I-70/71 Columbus Crossroads Project

Cookstown Heritage Conservation District Study Public Consultation March 26, 2013

2.1 Decision Making Matrix

Sec Development design approval and procedures.

58: 1285 Sedgewick Crescent, Rotary Gardens

California Preservation Foundation Historic Resources 101 HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP

Architectural Inventory Form (page 1 of 5)

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

Municipal Heritage Awards Program

7.0 Conservation Policy

Section 6A 6A Purpose of the Natural Features and Landscapes Provisions

CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE

APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS

Landscape Design Requirements and Guidelines for Private Lots in the Old Town North Neighborhood

KITSAP COUNTY REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES NOMINATION FORM

San Francisco General Plan Preservation Element: Objectives 7-9. Historic Preservation Commission August 20, 2014

Architectural Inventory Form

Architectural Inventory Form

21: Sovereign Street, Streetscape

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

City of Kingston Heritage Commemoration Program Guidelines: 7 May 2010

Architectural Woodwork Standards. historic restoration. s e c t i o n

52: 2182 Lakeshore Road East, Horizons

9: 204 & 240 Front Street, George Street Parkette & Dingle Park. 1. Description of Property. Name (if applicable) Legal Description

ROYAL PINES SECURITY REVIEW - REPORT TO PBC

Heritage Property 70 Liberty Street (Central Prison Chapel)

PDA SUBMISSION: Queen s Wharf, Brisbane (DEV2017/846)

HE VISION. Building a Better Connected Place

DESIGN GUIDELINES. Planning Commission Re-Submittal. December 23, 2014 Revised to include Mixed-Use Design District Guidelines

Receive recommendations from representatives of the Future Land Use Plan Advisory Committee regarding their review of the Land Use Element of the

The Vision. Photo provided by The Minervini Group. 46 Vision, Objectives & Strategies

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

Downtown. Design Review. City of Bartlesville Bartlesville welcomes and encourages Special Events. Special Events build a sense of

Architectural Inventory Form

HISTORIC SITE AND MONUMENT COMMISSION (HSMC) Instructions for Historical Markers, Monuments, and Public Art Application

NZS 4517:2010. New Zealand Standard. Fire sprinkler systems for houses. Superseding NZS 4517:2002 NZS 4517:2010

ARTICLE XIX SCREENING, LANDSCAPING AND TREES

HISTORIC SITE FORM - HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (10-08) 1 IDENTIFICATION

DESIGN REVIEW STANDARDS CITY OF LANGLEY

Transcription:

SAMPLE DOCUMENT Type of Document: Preservation Policies Museum Name: Colonial Williamsburg Foundation Date: unknown Type: Historic Site/Landscape Budget Size: Over $25 million Budget Year: 2006 Governance Type: Private, Nonprofit Organization Accredited: Yes Notes on strengths or special features: The document addresses the following issues: Preservation of: Objects Structures Landscapes Philosophy Priorities Roles & Responsibilities Preventive Care Security Conservation/Preservation Treatment Access Exhibition Loans Documentation Definitions Other: Research USE STATEMENT & COPYRIGHT NOTICE The AAM Information Center has provided this sample document. It serves as an example of how one museum addresses a particular issue. Museums should compose original materials based on their unique circumstances. Any document produced by the recipient should not substantially use the contents of this sample as the basis. Materials in the AAM Information Center are provided "as is," without any guarantee or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied. NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS Under certain conditions specified in the copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code), libraries and archives may furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. The photocopy or reproduction may not be used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship or research. If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of fair use, that user may be liable for copyright infringement.

COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG FOUNDATION Guidelines for Architectural and Landscape Preservation Colonial Williamsburg has been a leader in the historic preservation movement in the United States from its beginning. However, its activities differ from those of the current mainstream of preservation practice in that the Foundation s primary goal is educational-- to teach about eighteenth-century life in all its aspects. These guidelines address the preservation and enhancement of the environment in which this history is taught. The town of Williamsburg, including its structures, fences, street furniture, landscaping, paving, etc., is the backdrop for teaching, but is also an important statement in and of itself. Its buildings and their surroundings not only serve as a proper setting, but are themselves significant artifacts and teaching tools. As such, it is important to refine and augment the townscape of eighteenth-century Williamsburg as authentically as possible through the continued reconstruction of eighteenth-century structures on their original sites and reevaluation of extant reconstructions and restorations as new documentation is uncovered. I. PREVIOUS PRACTICE, ARCHITECTURAL PRESERVATION In 1928, the Advisory Committee of Architects met and passed twenty resolutions to guide the restoration of Williamsburg, which William G. Perry then condensed into ten guiding principles that governed the original restoration of Williamsburg. They were: 1. That all buildings or parts of buildings in which Colonial Tradition persists should be retained irrespective of their actual date. 2. That where the Classic Tradition persists in buildings or parts of buildings great discretion should be exercised before destroying them. 3. That within the Restoration Area all work which no longer represents Colonial or Classical tradition should be demolished or removed. 4. That old buildings in Williamsburg outside the Restoration Area wherever possible should be left and if possible preserved on their original sites and restored there rather than moved within the Area. 5. That no surviving old work should be rebuilt for structural reasons if any reasonable additional trouble and expense will suffice to preserve it. 6. That there should be held in the mid of the architects and in the marking of buildings the distinction between preservation where the object is scrupulous retention of the surviving work by ordinary repair, and restoration where the

object is the recovery of the old form by new work; and that the largest practicable number of buildings should be preserved rather than restored. 7. That such preservation and restoration work requires a slower pace than ordinary modern construction work and that in our opinion a superior result should be preferred to more rapid progress. 8. That in restoration the use of old materials and details of the period and character, properly marked, is commendable when they can be secured. 9. That in securing of old materials there should be no demolition or removal of buildings where there seems a reasonable prospect that they will persist intact on their original sites. 10. That where new materials must be used, they should be of a character approximating the old as closely as possible, but that no attempt should be made to antique them by theatrical means. These became known as the Decalogue and governed the Restoration for sixty-two years. Although there has been some straying from time to time, they have generally been followed. Today, however, some of these principles are no longer relevant. II. CURRENT PRESERVATION GUIDELINES, HISTORIC AREA BUILDINGS The following broad guidelines are adopted to assist future generations in their mission to preserve the Historic Area: 1. That all structures within the Historic Area shall be maintained and preserved to the fullest degree possible. No architectural change shall be made in an Historic Area building unless the evidence supporting the change, when due consideration is given to research, expense, and interpretive program, is deemed to justify significant architectural alterations. The new evidence must be of the following order of magnitude: A. discovery of original documentation whose authenticity is convincing and whose information is specific and unambiguous. B. as assessment of cumulative evidence which in pattern and volume leads to an authoritatively consensual view regarding the most probable expression of the architectural features in question. C. a reevaluation of the original evidence with minor or modest additions from current scholarship which depends on a carefully integrated deductive line of argument to arrive at an alternative conclusion. 2

D. there appears a single piece of evidence, or architectural judgment, which so contradicts the use of the features in question that the appropriateness of its use must be denied. 2. The interpretation of an Historic Area structure should always reflect the current knowledge we have of the building and its features. In the event that current research clearly reveals some past feature as no longer supportable, we are obligated to take that face into account in the interpretation offered the public. 3. That structures important to the recreation of the Historic environment shall be preserved, restored and/or reconstructed through thorough and intensive scholarly research, with a minimum of conjecture. 4. That where feasible, features of the eighteenth-century urban landscape of Williamsburg, including streets, gardens and topography, greens, fences, and other physical evidence of life in the capital, shall be preserved. 5. That no structure shall be erected in the Historic Area for which no physical evidence exists, except where research strongly suggests that such structure might typically have existed on that site in the eighteenth century and enough evidence exists for an historically-acceptable design. Amenities necessary for visitors comfort (such as trash receptacles, water fountains, etc.) shall be kept as unobtrusive as possible. 6. That old buildings on Colonial Williamsburg property within and without the Historic Area shall, whenever possible, be left and preserved on their original sites, that no surviving old work shall be rebuilt for any reason if additional trouble and expense will suffice to preserve it, and that every effort shall be made to protect the historical integrity of all structures. 7. That it shall be understood that reconstruction and restoration work requires a slower pace than ordinary modern construction work and that a superior result should be preferred to more rapid progress. 8. That the Foundation shall not encourage the demolition of old buildings for the securing of old materials. Old materials shall be used only where new materials will not suffice, such as patching original floors, and these materials shall not be removed from a standing structure. 9. That where new materials are used, they shall be of a character approximating the old techniques as closely as possible. When new material is installed in original buildings, it shall have the year it was installed inscribed on an unexposed surface. 3

10. That post-colonial buildings not owned by Colonial Williamsburg within the Historic Area are, by their very nature, representatives of their periods. At such time that any of these buildings come into the possession of the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, a determination shall be made regarding the value of their contribution to the streetscape. 11. That all reconstructions, restorations and changes, to both buildings and sites, shall be documented with drawings, photographs and written accounts and that all architectural conservation activities shall also be recorded. III. CURRENT PRESERVATION GUIDELINES FOR BUILDINGS OUTSIDE THE HISTORIC AREA. 1. The preservation practices that apply to eighteenth century structures inside the Historic Area shall apply to eighteenth century structures outside the Historic Area. A high level of maintenance shall be performed to avoid deterioration of these buildings, and special consideration shall be given to preserving early fabric. 2. Preservation practices applicable to non-eighteenth century structures outside the Historic Area shall depend upon each structure s architectural significance, historical significance, and contextual contribution to the neighborhood. The Foundation Architect shall be included in the process of determining each structure s value. However, cost/benefit analyses may be of greater importance in making decisions about those structures deemed not of special value for architectural, historical, or contextual reasons. 3. All structures shall be documented prior to demolition, the extend of documentation to be based on the importance of the structure. 4. Where a well-defined, desirable neighborhood character exists, consideration shall be given to retaining and enhancing that character through a combination of preservation and compatible new construction, balanced against the economic viability of the established pattern and the needs of the community at large. IV. CURRENT LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES FOR THE HISTORIC AREA 1. All present landscape features, including garden layouts and physical elements contained therein, will be retained as originally designed by the Foundation s landscape architects, unless more authentic interpretation of the site is undertaken. 2. When additional research leads to original documentation, cumulative evidence in pattern and volume, or other positive evidence of a convincing character concerning lost landscape or garden features, recreation of those features will be considered on a site-by-site basis. In all such cases, before any changes or revisions are made, all existing site conditions and features must be 4

photographically and graphically recorded for the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation Archives. 3. Only those plants native to tidewater Virginia and those plants known to have been available to and/or planted by the colonists in the eighteenth century will be used in the gardens. These plants will be grown according to cultural practices known to have been in use in the eighteenth century. Where the original plantings of a recreated garden have since become seriously threatened by disease or other natural disaster, replacements may be made using different plants in accordance with these guidelines. 4. Landscape plant material, having a transitory and evolutionary cycle according to its genus and/or species, will be replaced individually as each specimen visibly enters decline, so that the total garden or site in question will evolve naturally never having all of its planting components completely new or old. 5. As additional buildings or sites are reconstructed, or where extant gardens are redesigned for interpretive purposes, landscape and site development will derive from study of all available research materials, and will recreate all known features as closely as possible to currently-accepted ideas about eighteenth-century appearances. Where hypothetical landscapes are developed, features should reflect known socio-economic circumstances associated with the occupants of that site at the period in which it is being interpreted and be based on comparable eighteenth-century precedents in the tidewater area. 5