ROSOLEM Ciro A., WITACKER João P. T., VANZOLINI Silvelena, RAMOS Valdir J.

Similar documents
Mechanisms of Nutrient Uptake: Is Fertilization Enough?

Availability of Calcium, Magnesium and Sulphur and Their Uptake by Amaranthus as Influenced by Composts and Fertilizers

Effect of Nitrogen and Potassium on Growth and Development of Curcuma alismatifolia Gagnep.

Demonstrate that inoculation can increase the yield of legumes.

ROOT GROWTH OF SODDED CREEPING BENTGRASS AS INFLUENCED BY

Effect of soil structure on phosphate nutrition of crop plants

Crop Management Practices. By Simon Bedasie

The Plastic Plant. Root Architectural Responses to Limited and Altered Nutrient Availability. Bahar Aciksöz May 17 th 2018, Rome

Brian Arnall Oklahoma State Univ. Dept. Plant and Soil Science

Soils. Nutrients needed by plants 10/21/2013. Consists of a series of layers called. Soils consists of: Topsoil (A horizon) upper most layer

Recirculating Nutrient Solution in Strawberry

Root Systems How they transport nutrients

Know Your Soil Getting the Dirt on Your Dirt FWAA. Dr. Steve Petrie Director of Agronomic Services

Soils and Fertilizers. Leo Espinoza Soils Specialist

Evaluating rootzone stresses and the role of the root system on rose crop productivity and fertilizer-water use efficiency:

Effect of Soil Amendment with Dry and Wet Distillers Grains on Growth of Canola and Soil Properties

Relationships between soil characters and nutrients uptake of three sugar beet varieties grown in newly reclaimed soil

Monitoring Nutrition for Crops

Fertilizers and nutrient management for hops. Diane Brown, Michigan State University Extension

PASTURE AND HAY FIELDS: SOIL FUNDAMENTALS. Sanders County April 8, Clain Jones

Intro t to S Soilils and S d Soi lil Fertility

What s in Your Media? Analysis of media components for micronutrient content

Growth and Quality of Oriental Lilies at Different Fertilization Levels

Soil is the Key (Chapter 3)

Nutrient Management And Nutrient Cycling Raymond C. Ward, President Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences V1(1)2010

FERTILITY MANAGEMENT FOR TOMATOES AND PEPPERS

Effect of different salinity levels on In vitro and Ex vitro growth of potato. Students: Ahmed Abu-Madi, Ali Nawsreh, Mutaz Arfat andmusab Bani Oedhe

Salinity stress effects changed during Aloe vera L. vegetative growth

Optimisation of the nutritional composition for the cultivation of

GROW & GROWTH. Products BROCHURE. Keeping together is Progress Working together is Success EVERGROW FOR SPECIALITY FERTILIZERS

Soils and plant nutrients

Managing Phosphorus to Optimize Potato Tuber Yield in the San Luis Valley

Proceedings of the 2 nd Annual Nitrogen: Minnesota s Grand Challenge & Compelling Opportunity Conference

ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL DESCRIPTORS

High frequency irrigations as means for reduction of pollution hazards to soil and water resources and enhancement of nutrients uptake by plants

Sunlight. Chlorophyll

Soil. Acidic soils... 1/19/2014

Inherent Factors Affecting Soil ph. Soil ph Management

The Dirt on Soil Science

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Soil test recommendations

Soils of Palau. Diversity and Fertility. Palau Livestock Management Workshop March 23-25, Jonathan Deenik, PhD University of Hawaii

Soil quality indicators & plant growth

Simulation for Year-Round Nutrient Uptake of Greenhouse Roses over Flowering Cycles

EFFECT OF GROWING MEDIA ON THE CORMELIZATION OF FREESIA UNDER THE AGRO-CLIMATIC CONDITIONS OF PESHAWAR

Evaluating rootzone stresses and the role of the root system on rose crop productivity and fertilizer-water use efficiency:

Anorganic Fertilizer. Lenny Sri Nopriani, SP.MP

Improving Your Grass With Calcium Sulfate

Grid or Zone sampling Unfertilized Soybean Fields in the Spring/Summer is Increasing (topsoil only)

Keeping greenhouse soils fertile: nutrients, compost and salt. Rupert Jannasch, Ironwood Farm ACORN Greenhouse Workshop Feb 28, 2012

POTATO VARIETY RESPONSE TO PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER

8. Fertility Management

Understanding Soil Variability to Utilize Variable Rate Fertilizer Technology

COVER SHEET. AUTHOR S NAME: Daniel Lloyd. MAJOR: Soil Science Agricultural Systems Production. DEPARTMENT: Soil Science. MENTOR: Doug Soldat

THE USE OF A SMALL HYDROPONIC SYSTEM FOR PRODUCING MARIGOLDS

Bio-solubilization of Rock Phosphate and Plant Growth Promotion by Aspergillus niger TMPS1 in Ultisol and Vertisol

USE OF SOME SELECTED WASTES AS SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL INPUTS

Soil Management Site Selection, Soil Fertility. Warren Roberts George Kuepper

Chapter 8: Soil ph and Lime Management

MSU Extension Publication Archive. Scroll down to view the publication.

Inherent Factors Affecting Soil ph. Soil ph Management

Management strategies for fertigation of sweet cherry

RESIDUAL LIME IN COMMERCIAL MEDIA DURING CROP PRODUCTION

Nutrient Management of Irrigated Alfalfa and Timothy

Growth Inhibitor Accumulates in the Nutrient Solution of Closed System Rose Cultivation

Site Selection. The #1 Most Important Step in Planting Anything Soils a major component. Physical Characteristics. Chemical Composition

NUTRITION FOR GREENHOUSE TOMATOES

Effects of Nitrogen Supply on the Root Morphology of Corn and Velvetleaf

Key words: physiological processes, hybrids, irrigated systems, chlorophylls, photosynthesis

General concept of fertilizer efficiency

THE INVESTIGATION BEGINS!

Class 3: Soil Sampling and Testing. Chris Thoreau

Soil Test Report. HOME GARDEN VEGETABLE GARDEN Analysis Results

Response of Nitrate and Ammonium on Growth of Prosopis Velutina and Simmondsia Chinensis Seedlings

Soil: We Can t Grow without it!

CHAPTER 4 EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE AND SOIL MOISTURE CONTENT ON CUTTING ESTABLISHMENT

Extending the Vase Life of Gerbera (Gerbera hybrida) Cut Flowers Using Chemical Preservative Solutions

GALLATIN GARDENER CLUB APRIL 6, Clain Jones

Developing and Implementing a Fertilizer Program. Marc van Iersel. mixed with substrate components before planting

Understanding Your Virginia Soil Test Report

+id 1:;~ T. C. Juang and G. Uehara Taiwan Sugar Experiment Station Taiwan and Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station Honolulu, Hawaii

1 Introduction. Keywords: Aeroponics, nutrient concentration, minituber, rapid multiplication, Ethiopia. , 252 g KNO 3 PO 4.

Getting the Most out of Your Strawberry Soil Test Report. General Information

The Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Inoculation on the Quality of Seedlings for the National Greening Program in the Philippines

Unlock your soil s potential with K-humate

Simulation of nutrient uptake by a growing root system considering increasing root density and inter-root competition

Research Report Row Spacing Effect on Forage Sorghum Yield and Quality at Maricopa, AZ, 2015

Nutrient Management for Tree Fruit. Mary Concklin Visiting Extension Educator Fruit Production and IPM University of Connecticut

Transplant Growth and Stand Establishment of Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Plants as Affected by Compost-Amended Substrate

Effects of Phosphorus and Calcium on Tuber Set, Yield, and Quality in Goldrush Potato

Response of Cymbidium Pine Clash Moon Venus to major nutrient at vegetative growth stage

Inbred Planting Technique for Nakhon Sawan 3 Hybrid Maize Seed Production

Turfgrass Fertility. Soil Test Reports. Why Soil Sample? Interpretation & Understanding

EFFECT OF PHOSPHATIC FERTILIZER RATES LEVEL ON GROWTH, CRUDE PROTEIN CONTENT AND NITROGEN FIXATION ABILITY OF ALFALFA AT SOWING YEAR

Effect of Method of Application of Double Superphosphate on the Yield and Phosphorus Uptake by Sugar Beets 1

Assessing and Amending Your Garden Soil Craig Cogger, Soil Scientist Emeritus Washington State University Puyallup

Fertility and Crop Nutrition Jonathan Deenik Assistant Specialist, Soil Fertility Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Sciences

Making Sense of Soil Tests

EFFECT OF THE PACKING DENSITY ON THE MECHANICAL IMPEDANCE OF ROOT MEDIA

Transcription:

Scientific registration n o : 0881 Symposium n o : 13B Presentation : Poster Root growth and nutrition of cotton as affected by phosphorus and liming Effet du phosphore et du chaulage sur la croissance racinaire et la nutrition du coton ROSOLEM Ciro A., WITACKER João P. T., VANZOLINI Silvelena, RAMOS Valdir J. Department of Agriculture and Plant Breeding, São Paulo State University, CP 237, 18603-970 Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil. INTRODUCTION Cotton root length increases up to flowering (80-90 days after plant emergence). After this there is not a significant increase in length but there is an increase in root dry matter (Nayakekorala and Taylor, 1990). The root length density is low when compared to other crop species, which leads to a low exploitation of the soil nutrients (Brouder and Cassman, 1990). The root growth pattern is genetically controlled but can be modified by the environment, as well as by soil characteristics (Taylor and Arkin, 1981). Besides the physical characteristics of the soil, toxic Al, low Ca and low P are known to affect root growth (Adams and Pearson, 1970; Barber, 1984; Rosolem et al., 1995). These chemical constraints can be overcome by liming, which neutralizes toxic Al, increases Ca levels and sometimes can make P more available to plants in tropical intemperized soils (Raij, 1991). Root growth of cotton was reduced when the soil Ca saturation was below 17% (Adams and Moore, 1983). Rosolem et al. (1996) noticed no increase in cotton root growth when the soil base saturation was raised from 40 to 52 % (Ca contents increased from 16 mm (c) kg -1 to 20 mm (c) kg -1 ), but in the higher base saturation the roots were able to penetrate in compacted layers of the soil. However, when the base saturation was increased to 67 %, and Ca contents to 26 mm (c) kg -1, there was a decrease in root growth due to Zn deficiency. Positive effects of Ca on root growth were observed in peanuts (Caires and Rosolem, 1991) and soybean (Rosolem et al., 1995) when the soil had 15 mm (c) dm -3 of Ca. The root surface of two corn hybrids were also increased when soil Ca was increased from 6 mm (c) dm -3 to 16 mm (c) dm -3 (Rosolem et al., 1994). Phosphorus uptake is dependent on root length, diameter and surface area in contact with the soil (Anghinoni and Barber, 1980). The soil P content also affect root morphology (Zhang and Barber, 1992). An increase in soil P can lead (Hajabbasi and Shumacher, 1994) or not (Rosolem et al., 1994) to an increase in corn root length and surface. The corn root morphology response to soil P depends also on the cultivar (Rosolem et al., 1994). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the initial growth and nutrition of cotton plants as related to root morphology and growth in response to phosphorus and lime application. 1

MATERIAL AND METHODS The experiment was conducted in greenhouse conditions in Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil, in 4 L pots containing a Dark Red Latosol (Acrortox, 20% clay, 72% sand). Originally the soil showed ph (CaCl 2 ) 4.0, 19 g kg -1 of Organic Matter, 3.2 mg kg -1 of P (resin), 7 mmol (c) kg -1 of Ca, 3 mmol (c) kg -1 of Mg and 0.5 mmol (c) kg -1 of K. Burnt dolomitic lime (450 g kg -1 of CaO and 150 g kg -1 of MgO) was applied at 2.24, 4.48 and 6.72 g pot -1. After a 35- day period of wet incubation, phosphorus was added at 0.0, 50, 100 and 150 mg kg -1 as KH 2 PO 4 and NH 4 H 2 PO 4. After 10 days the pots were fertilized with 100 mg kg -1 of K as KCl, 30 mg kg -1 of N as urea, 2 mg kg -1 of B as H 3 BO 3 and 3 mg kg -1 of Zn as ZnCl 2 and 4 pregerminated (germination chamber, 25/30 ºC, 72 hours) cotton (cv. IAC 22) seeds were planted to each pot. One week after plant emergence, the pots were thinned to 2 plants. The soil was sampled and analyzed at planting (Table 1). The pots were watered daily to maintain soil water around 80% of the water holding capacity. The average temperature in the greenhouse during the experiment was 23.6 ºC and the average Relative Humidity was 78%. The plants were grown for 42 days. At harvest, the plants were separated in tops and roots. The roots were separated from the soil with tap water over a 0.5 mm screen. Dry weight of the roots was determined in a subsample. In another subsample we determined root length (Tennant, 1975), diameter and surface (Hallmark and Barber, 1984). The tap root was separated from the secondary and analyzed separately. The top and root tissues were ground, wet digested and analyzed for P, K, Ca and Mg contents. The experimental design was a factorial 3 x 4 with 4 replicates in randomized blocks. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Liming caused an increase in ph, soil Mg, Ca, base saturation and Ca saturation The potential acidity (H + Al) was decreased (Table 1). In this soil, at a ph (CaCl 2 ) of 4.8 Al should not be in toxic concentrations (Raij, 1991). Table 1: Selected soil chemical characteristics at planting time. Lime ph H + + Al +3 Mg Ca Ca Base Saturation g kg -1 --------- mmol (c) kg -1 ---------- -------------- % ------------------ 2.24 4.8 40 11 18 24 46 4.48 5.2 32 15 24 32 58 6.72 5.5 26 20 29 36 68 The application of 0, 50, 100 and 150 mg kg -1 of P resulted in 14, 34, 83 and 88 mg kg -1 of soil P, respectively, by planting time. The only P x lime significant interaction was observed in K nutrition. As regarding the other parameters, the effects of P and lime are presented and discussed separately. There was no effect of liming on dry matter yield, root length and surface (Table 2), but the root diameter was decreased from 0.33 to 0.30 mm with the increase in soil Ca. The smallest lime rate increased the Ca content of the soil to 18 mmol (c) kg -1, what was not 2

expected, since the original content was 7 mmol (c) kg -1. Ca saturation was increased to 24 %, higher than the threshold of 17 % defined by Adams and Moore (1983). In a similar soil, Rosolem et al. (1996) found that an increase in the soil Ca content over 16 mmol (c) kg -1, corresponding to a soil base saturation over 40%, led to an increase in cotton root growth only when the soil was compacted. In corn, increases in root surface were noticeable when Ca contents in the soil were raised up to 16 mmol (c) kg -1, with no further change when Ca was increased up to 54 mmol (c) kg -1 (Rosolem et al., 1994). In this experiment, cotton roots were less responsive to Ca than soybeans or peanut roots (Caires and Rosolem, 1991; Rosolem et al., 1995). Table 2: Cotton plants characteristics as affected by liming Lime Dry matter yields Root characteristics Root Shoot Total Length Surface Diameter g kg -1 ----------------- g plant -1 -------------- m cm 2 mm 2.24 0.44 1.44 1.88 1480 300 0.33a 4.48 0.41 1.07 1.48 1500 295 0.32ab 6.72 0.41 1.24 1.65 1540 302 0.30b F test ns (1) ns ns ns ns * (2) (1) ns - not significant (2) * - significant (P< 0.05) There was no effect of liming on the amount of P, Ca and Mg uptake per unit of root surface. There was an increase in root and shoot dry mater yields due to P fertilization with the increase in P contents from 14 to 83 mg kg-', which corresponds to the application of 100 mg kg-' of P (Fig. 1). The increase in shoot dry matter was proportionally higher in the shoots than in the roots, resulting in a higher shoot/root ratio in the higher soil P contents, respectively 2.5, 3.1, 3.4 and 3.6 with the application of 0, 50, 100 and 150 mg kg -1 of P. Root length and surface were also increased by P fertilization up to 83 mg kg -1 of P in the soil (Fig. 2). Root diameter was increased from 0.317 to 0.328 with P rates up to 100 mg kg -1, and than decreased to 0.298 with the highest P rate. The increase in root surface was mainly due to the increase in length, because the curves are very similar. Figure 1:Dry matter of cotton roots, shoots and total as affected by Phophorus fertilization An increase in root length due to P fertilization was expected (Brouder and Cassman, 1994), but the root length and diameter response depends on the amount of available P and also on the cultivar (Hajabbasi and Shumacher, 1994). 3

On the other hand, P concentration in the roots and shoots were increased by P fertilization up to 50 mg kg -1 (33 mg kg -1 in the soil), with no further increases in the higher P rates (Fig. 3). P fertilization led to a higher efficiency in nutrient acquisition by the cotton plants (Table 3). Root length Root Surface Figure 2: Root length and surface as affected by Phophorus fertilization Figure 3: P contents in cotton roots and shoots as affected by Phophorus fertilization Looking at Fig. 3 and Table 3, it can be inferred that, at low soil P contents, the response to P was due to an increase in root length and in the efficiency of P absorption. At the higher P contents, the increase in nutrient uptake was related mainly to root growth. With low soil P. the transport of the nutrient to the root surface was limiting the process and the root growth rate was not big enough to compensate for the low P levels. The plants were P deficient, limiting the amount of the available energy for ion uptake in general. Phosphorus fertilization causes an increase in the P concentration in the soil solution, in the buffer power of the soil and also in the effective diffusion coefficient (Barber, 1984). At high soil P levels the transport the nutrient to plant roots allowed for an uptake rate close to Imax (Barber 1984: maximum influx of nutrients), overcoming the P deficiency and allowing for high uptake rates of P and also of the other nutrients. In this case the nutrient uptake was closely related to root growth (Fig. 2 and 3, Table 3). Table 3: Phosphorus, calcium and magnesium accumulation per unit of root surface as affected by P fertilization and potassium accumulation as affected by P fertilization and lime application. P applied P Ca Mg K Lime = 2.24 Lime = 4.48 Lime = 6.72 mg kg -1 ------------------------------ mg cm -2 -------------------------------------------- 0 7.2c (1) 34.1b 199.8d 291.6c 228.7b 50 14.8b 39.8ab 270.3c 373.2b 248.1b 100 19.6a 48.7 a 547.7a 401.8b 306.2a 150 19.4a 49.7 a 491.4b 452.3a 240.1b 4

(1) Different letters in the columns show significant differences (P<0.05) Potassium uptake per unit of root volume was increased by P fertilization up to 100 mg kg -1, and was decreased by liming at the higher P rates (Table 3). The Ca x K interaction is well known. At the lower P rates there was a general limitation to nutrient uptake, which may have avoided the interaction. On the other hand, we could not find an explanation for the decrease in K uptake with the highest P rate, what was observed in the lowest and highest lime rates. CONCLUSIONS Soil Ca contents of 18 mmol (c) kg -1 and higher provided for a good root and shoot development of cotton plants. Phosphorus concentrations in cotton shoots and roots were increased when the soil P was increased up to 33 mg kg -1, but the maximum root length, root surface and root and shoot dry matter yields were observed only when soil P contents were raised to 83 mg kg -1, when the plants showed a higher shoot/root ratio. Besides an increase in root length and surface, there was an increase in P uptake efficiency as soil P was increased. REFERENCES Adams, F. and Moore. 1983. Chemical factors affecting root growth in subsoil horizons of coastal plain soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 47: 99-102. Adams, F. and Pearson, R.W. 1970. Differential response of cotton and peanuts to subsoil acidity. Agron. J., 62: 9-12. Anghinoni, I. and Barber, S.A. 1980. Phosphorus influx and growth characteristics of corn roots as influenced by P supply. Agron. J., 72: 685-688. Barber, S.A. 1984. Soil nutrient bioavailability: a mechanistic approach. John Willey and Sons, New York. 308 p. Brouder, S.M. and Cassman. K.G. 1990. Root development of two cotton cultivars in relation to potassium uptake and plant growth in a vermiculitic soil. Field Crops Res., 23: 187-203. Brouder, S.M. and Cassman. K.G. 1994. Cotton root and shoot response to localized supply of nitrate, phosphate and potassium: Split-pot studies with nutrient solution and vermiculitic soil. Plant and Soil, 161: 179-193. Caires, E.F. and Rosolem, C.A. 1991. Root growth of peanut cultivars and soil acidity, pp. 239-244. In: Wright, R.J.; Baligar, V.C.; Murrmann, R.P. (eds). Plant soil interactions at low ph. Kluwer Ac. Publ., Dordrecht. Hajabbasi, M.A. and Shumacher, T.E. 1994. Phosphorus effects on root growth and development in two maize genotypes. Plant and Soil, 158: 39-46. 5

Hallmark, W.B. and Barber, S.A. 1984. root growth and morphology, nutrient uptake and nutrient status of early growth of soybeans as affected by soil P and K. Agron. J., 76: 209-212. Nayakekorala, H. and Taylor, H.M. 1990. Phosphorus uptake rates of cotton roots at different growth stages from different soil layers Plant and Soil, 122:105-110. Raij. B. van. 1991. Fertilidade do solo e adubação. Piracicaba: Ed. Agronômica Ceres ltda. 181 p. Rosolem, C.A.; Assis, J.S.; Santiago, A.D. 1994. Root growth and mineral nutrition of corn hybrids as affected by phosphorus and lime. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant An. 25: 2491-1499. Rosolem, C.A.; Bicudo, S.J.; Marubayashi, O.M. 1995. Soybean yield and root growth as affected by lime rate and quality. p.543-547. In: Date, R.A.; Grandon, G.E.; Rayment, G.E.; Probert, M.E. (eds). Plant and soil interactions at low ph: principles and management. Kluwer Ac. Publ., Dordrecht. Rosolem, C.A.; Schiochet, M.A.; Souza, L.S.; Whitacker, J.P.T. 1996. Root growth and cotton nutrition as affected by liming and soil compaction. p. 160, In: International Symposium on Plant-Soil Interactions at Low ph, 4, Belo Horizonte, MG Brazil. Program and Abstracts. Taylor, H.M. and Arkin, G.F. 1981. Root zone modification: fundamentals and alternatives. In: Taylor, H.M. and Arkin, G.F. Modifying the root environment to reduce crop stress. St. Joseph, Michigan, ASAE. p.3-16. Tennant, D. 1975. A test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length. J. Ecology. 63: 995-1001. Zhang, J. and Barber, S.A. 1992. Maize root distribution between phosphorus fertilized and unfertilized soil. Soil Sci. Am. J., 56: 819-822. Keywords: Lime, nutrient bioavailability, soil calcium, soil phosphorus, root length Mots clés : calcaire, biodisponibilité des éléments, calcium du sol, phosphore du sol, longueur des racines 6