Section 106 Consulting Parties Kick-off Meeting

Similar documents
Section 106 Consulting Party Meeting Summary Report March 29, 2018

Chicago Plan Commission. Obama Presidential Center May 17, 2018

FACT SHEET: COMMUNITY INPUT S IMPACT ON THE DESIGN FOR THE OBAMA PRESIDENTIAL CENTER

Section 106 Historic Properties Identification Report

2.1.8 Cultural Resources Regulatory Setting. Affected Environment, Environmental

Corridor Management Committee. September 29, 2017

California Preservation Foundation Historic Resources 101 HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP

HISTORIC BRIDGE FOR SALE COLUMBIA BRIDGE IN JACKSON PARK, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS

CEQA and Historic Preservation: A 360 Degree Review

CULTURAL LANDSCAPES: IDENTIFICATION, EVALUATION, IN 106 PROCESS

Public Information/Cultural Resources Committee Workshop August 15, Florida Department of Transportation District One

Appendix E Memorandum of Agreement between FHWA and the SHPO

January 29, 2015 Page 1 of Annual Status Report St. Elizabeths Programmatic Agreement. PA Ref. Line Begin End. Description Timeframe Category

DRAFT SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION INTERSTATE 73 FEIS: I-95 to I-73/I-74 in North Carolina

April 11, 2016 Park Board Chair and Commissioners General Manager Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation New Brighton Salt Marsh - Preferred Concept

Beckett Bridge PD& E Study. Presentation to: Board of County Commissioners

Appendix E Section 4(f) Evaluation

Bassett Creek Valley Working Group. October 4, 2017

2013 Annual Status Report St. Elizabeths Programmatic Agreement. January 29, 2014 Page 1 of 8. PA Ref. Line Begin End. Description Timeframe Category

Three Views on Landscape Documentation

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

Summary of Other State Archeological Guidelines

APPENDIX I PUBLIC MEETING AT PROJECT INCEPTION

7.0 SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION

SUMMARY. Support the Southeast Arkansas Regional Intermodal Facility.

New Jersey and National Registers of Historic Places. Jonathan Kinney Senior Historic Preservation Specialist NJ Historic Preservation Office

Jackson Park Design Evolution

Design Alternatives Workshop. Hilfiker Park Master Plan Workshop #2

Ashland BRT Environmental Assessment: logos of CTA, CDOT, Chicago Department of Housing and Economic Development

What We Heard Public Engagement - Stage 1

HUMBER BAY PARK PROJECT - BUILDING CONCEPT

systems is available on the Colorado Wetland Information Center (CWIC) website.

Stewardship. Streamlining. Consensus

The Illinois Department of Transportation and Lake County Division of Transportation. Route 173, including the Millburn Bypass

December 1, 2014 (revised) Preliminary Report -- Thomas Jefferson Site Evaluation

ITS Concept Development Activity Descriptions

Don Mills Crossing Study and Celestica Lands Development Application Community Meeting, Open House, and Breakout Discussions

Jackson Park Watch. P.O. Box 15302, Chicago, Illinois

West Dennis Center: Bass River to Old Main Street. West Dennis Business District: Old Main Street to Dennis Commons

Transportation Improvements

Scarborough Waterfront Project

I. STAFF POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS. The following RMP policy strategies are proposed by staff in support of a Scenic Resource Protection Program:

Countywide Green Infrastructure

NOMINATIONS TO THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES:

PROJECT BACKGROUND. Preliminary Design Scope and Tasks

Rapid Transit Implementation Working Group September 14, 2017

WARM SPRINGS PARK MASTER PLAN

PUBLIC HEARING. Thursday, December 14, 2017 FDOT Urban Office 2198 Edison Avenue Jacksonville, FL 32204

Page. I. Introduction 1. II. Project Purpose and Need 2. IV. Description of Section 4(f) Property 2. V. Impacts to Section 4(f) property 3

Inform you of the purpose and scope of the study for PTH 100 and a proposed future St. Norbert Bypass;

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code 3S, 3CS, 5S3 Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Request for Proposal

Planning Commission Report

The Village of Sugar Grove, in partnership with Kane County, the Illinois Department of Transportation, and the Illinois Tollway welcomes you to the

Meeting Display Boards for Public Hearing on the Wilson Transfer Station Project held Tuesday, February 18, 2014.

Clay Street Bridge Replacement Project

PUBLIC HEARING. DRAFT Environmental Impact Statement. Matthews Memorial Baptist Church Washington, DC October 18, National Capital Region

Environmental Resources Branch

KING GEORGE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. Update on Governor Harry W. Nice Bridge Replacement Project February 6, 2018

2035 General Plan Update and Belmont Village Specific Plan. Joint Study Session with the City Council and Planning Commission April 12, 2016

General Terms Property, as used to describe eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL RFP PRESERVATION MASTER PLAN FOR THE ELAM MARTIN FARMSTEAD CITY OF WATERLOO RIM PARK TERMS OF REFERENCE

Public Workshop #2 Summary

Streets for People, Place-Making and Prosperity. #TOcompletestreets

Overview of Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission s (SPC) 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)

SECTION 4(f) DE MINIMIS DOCUMENTATION

APPENDIX L3. Table of Contents. SWP EA Information Sheets

Chapter 19: Cultural Resources

Development Reviews. An overview of the Commission s review process, primarily in Klickitat County. March 13, 2018

7.5 Impacts on the Section 4(f) Properties

TOWN OF BETHLEHEM OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION PLAN PUBLIC MEETING: OCTOBER 12, 2017

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

Preliminary concept information. Green cities fund

FOUR MILE RUN VALLEY WORKING GROUP AND CHARGE

Shoreline Master Program Town of La Conner, Washington

Draft Environmental Assessment

Architectural Inventory Form

Open House Public Involvement Meeting Howland High School Cafeteria, 200 Shaffer Drive NE, Warren, Ohio. Informational Handout

Architectural Inventory Form (page 1 of 5)

BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study

Elfrida Growth Area Study

Presentation August 20, 2013

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

Architectural Inventory Form (page 1 of 5)

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Phase 2 Eden Landing Ecological Reserve Scoping Meeting for EIS/EIR. June 30, 2016

I-290 Eisenhower Expressway

PennDOT. single spann lanes and 3- mayy need to be to accommodate. any bridge. addition to III. Date: CRP 07/27/2015 CRP.

Ashbridges Bay Erosion and Sediment Control Project

The following principles guide the development of goals and strategies to protect and promote these amenities:

HAZARD MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Cultural Landscape Heritage Impact Statement Terms of Reference

Decision Notice. Proposed Action

SHORELINE, FLOOD AND COASTAL DEFENCE MANAGEMENT PLANS

MISSISSIPPI GORGE REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN

Vaughan Metropolitan Centre (VMC) Black Creek Renewal CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

DRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4

Page. I. Introduction 1. II. Project Purpose and Need 1. IV. Description of Section 4(f) Property 2. V. Impacts to Section 4(f) Property 3

WELCOME! 8 8:30 6: TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Open House. Presentation & Q&A

SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:

Transcription:

OPC Mobility Improvements to Support the SLFP Update Section 106 Consulting Parties Kick-off Meeting December 1, 2017 South Side YMCA 6330 S Stony Island Ave 10 AM 12 PM 1

Project Contacts and Website Chicago Department of Planning and Development: Eleanor Gorski Abby Monroe Chicago Department of Transportation John Sadler Project Website URL https://tinyurl.com/jpimprovements Other Websites http://www.achp.gov/regsflow.html https://southlakefrontplan.com/ 2

Agenda For Today Section 106 Consulting Parties Meeting #1 1. Background Project Introduction Federal Reviews and Timeline Public Participation 2. Section 106 Review Section 106 Area of Potential Effect Archaeology Architecture (Buildings, Structures and Landscape) History of Jackson Park and the Midway Plaisance Historic Features 3. Next Steps 4. Participant Feedback 3

Meeting Expectations for All Participants 1. To explain the Section 106 process and its relationship to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 2. To describe the various participant roles and opportunities for input 3. To share historic information gathered to date and refine with participant input 4

Section 106 Participant Expectations We encourage open and honest dialogue, and ask that you please respect every group member s time and input. To start and end on time, please arrive promptly and plan to stay for the duration of the meeting. If you are unable attend, we encourage you to ask another representative from your group to fill in for you. Please silence your cell phones. We ask that conversations remain focused on project-related issues. We ask that participants recognize that we are very early in the process, and any materials that are shared should be considered DRAFT. 5

Current Activities In Jackson Park Ongoing Obama Foundation Stakeholder Meetings South Lakefront Framework Plan Public Meetings Starting Today! Section 106 Consulting Party Meetings Starting Soon NEPA Public Meetings Starting Next Year Plan Commission and City Council Hearings 6

PROJECT INTRODUCTION Section 106 Federal Undertaking Proposed roadway improvements Potential conversion of park land to non-recreation use 7

PROJECT INTRODUCTION Section 106 and the South Lakefront Framework Plan (SLFP) Update Chicago Park District is currently facilitating the South Lakefront Framework Plan (SLFP) Update Only some recommendations in the SLFP require Federal review: 1. Roadway improvements due to roadway closures Federal Highway Administration 2. Potential conversion of parkland to non-recreational use under the Urban Parks Recreation and Recovery Program (UPARR) National Park Service 8

PROJECT INTRODUCTION Proposed Roadway Improvements 9

PROJECT INTRODUCTION Proposed Obama Presidential Center 10

Federal Reviews and Timeline 11

FEDERAL REVIEW National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 Requires federal agencies to assess the environmental effects of their proposed actions prior to making decisions. Essential Elements of NEPA Purpose and Need Alternatives Impacts Mitigation Public Involvement Interagency Coordination Documentation 12

FEDERAL REVIEW Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 Section 106 requires Federal Agencies to: Take into account the effects of their undertakings on historic properties; and Afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation a reasonable opportunity to comment on such undertakings. What is the undertaking? Roadway improvements (potential federal funding), and OPC and related SLFP improvements (potential conversion of parkland to non-recreation use within the meaning of UPARR) Section 106 regulations describe the process for identifying historic properties, assessing effects to historic properties, and mitigating adverse effects. Historic properties: either listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Section 106 review is completed under the umbrella of NEPA. 13

FEDERAL REVIEW NEPA and Section 106 NEPA Historic Resources Noise Traffic Wildlife/ Habitat Air & Water Quality Socioeconomics Section 106 Archeology Architecture The NEPA process is being led by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) in coordination with other Federal, State and Local agencies. DPD and CDOT will facilitate the Section 106 review process in coordination with FHWA. 14

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Section 106 Process (as outlined by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP)) 1. INITIATE the process Completed Determine the undertaking Coordinate with other reviews Identify consulting parties Develop public input opportunities 2. IDENTIFY historic resources Today through Spring 2018 Determine Area of Potential Effect (APE) Reasonable identification of historic resources & eligibility Review with consulting parties 3. ASSESS if adverse effects Spring/Summer 2018 Apply criteria of adverse effects Review with consulting parties 4. RESOLVE adverse effects (if needed) Summer/Fall 2018 See handout for more detail Develop alternatives to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects Review with consulting parties Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) PROCEED WITH PROPOSED PROJECT https://tinyurl.com/jpimprovements 15

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Section 106 and NEPA Parallel to Section 106 meetings, the project team will host public meetings to discuss additional topics under NEPA and provide updates on Section 106 progress. The NEPA process will culminate in a formal public hearing, which will be advertised in newspapers, by email and online at: https://tinyurl.com/jpimprovements 16

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Section 106 Participants Federal Agencies (FHWA, NPS, USACE) Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Consulting Parties Entitled Consulting Parties Illinois Department of Transportation State Historic Preservation Officer Indian Tribes Local governments Applicant(s) for federal funds or authorization (CDOT, DPD) Invited Consulting Parties Others with a demonstrated legal or economic interest, or concern about historic properties The Public 17

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Role of a Consulting Party Participate in consulting party meetings Share information and cultural context about historic resources within the project study area Provide comments on project documents at key project milestones 76 entities have been invited 50 have accepted to date See handout for more detail 18

Section 106 Area of Potential Effect 19

SECTION 106 REVIEW Establishing the Areas of Potential Effect (APE) Definition: The APE is the geographic area where the project could potentially have an effect on historic resources. Archaeology: Method of Determination Consider areas of disturbance Architecture: Method of Determination - Consider the full range of effects that might occur, including direct physical effects as well as visual and audial effects. 20

SECTION 106 REVIEW Area of Potential Effect (Archaeology) 21

SECTION 106 REVIEW Archaeology Survey Illinois State Archaeological Survey (ISAS) is conducting the archaeology survey to identify potential underground historic resources. Archaeology work is focusing on locations where there could be potential for ground disturbance. Archaeology work started on 11/13/17 and will conclude in the Spring. 22

SECTION 106 REVIEW Area of Potential Effect (Architecture) 23

SECTION 106 REVIEW Architecture Scope within Jackson Park and the Midway Buildings and structures Landscape features Sculpture/art Site furnishings Area of Scope All of Jackson Park Sections of Midway located within Study Area 24

SECTION 106 REVIEW Architecture Scope outside Jackson Park and the Midway (EAST of Metra Viaduct) Potentially eligible buildings will be researched to provide: Description History/ Development National Register Eligibility 25

SECTION 106 REVIEW Architecture Scope outside Jackson Park and the Midway (WEST of Metra Viaduct) Hyde Park Area Majority already included in the Hyde Park- Kenwood National Register district Woodlawn Area Reconnaissance-level survey to identify historic properties 26

SECTION 106 REVIEW National Register of Historic Places Eligibility Criteria Properties must be 50 years old or older*, and meet with at least one of the following criteria: (A) that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or (B) that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or (C) that embody distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or (D) that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. AND a property must also possess sufficient integrity to convey its significance. *Properties less than 50 years old must possess exceptional significance to be listed. 27

History of Jackson Park and the Midway Plaisance 28

HISTORY Historic Development of Jackson Park The park reflects layers of important architectural and landscape designs, historic changes and events, including: Original Olmsted & Vaux Plan, 1871 Olmsted, Codman, Burnham & Root, 1893 design for the World s Columbian Exposition Olmsted, Olmsted & Eliot, 1895-97 (third full plan) to transform the site back to parkland after the Fair Golf Course Added, 1899 (First public golf course west of the Alleghenies) Beaches Added, 1880s- 1919 (Granite beach, two bathing beaches, Bathing Pavilion at 63 rd St.) Fine Arts Palace transformed, 1893-1933 (becomes Field Columbian Museum/Museum of Science and Industry) Paul Douglas Nature Sanctuary created and community rallies for removal of Nike Site, late 1960s Jackson Park and Midway Plaisance listed on the National Register of Historic places, 1972 29

HISTORY Jackson Park and Midway Plaisance Midway Plaisance (90 acres) Eastern Division Jackson Park (593 acres) Frederick Law Olmsted (1822 1903) Father of American Landscape Architecture Western Division Washington Park (372 acres) An artist, he paints with lakes and wooded slopes; with lawns and banks and forest covered hills; with mountain sides and ocean views." - Daniel H. Burnham 30

HISTORY Olmsted s Design Principles 1895 Olmsted, Olmsted & Eliot Plan emphasized: THE LAKE with broad views of Lake Michigan from a Shore Drive. FIELDS of pastoral landscapes designed for strolling, tennis and croquet, and baseball (Golf was later added to meadow areas). LAGOONS that were almost completely secluded and provided scenery from the shore and boats. FIELD COLUMBIAN MUSEUM (now MSI) added formal design for architectural harmony. 31

Historic Features in Jackson Park and the Midway 32

HISTORIC FEATURES See handout for details Currently Identified Historic Features 1. IOWA BUILDING 2. MUSIC COURT COMFORT STATION 3. BOWLING GREEN CLUBHOUSE 4. MUSIC COURT BRIDGE 5. EAST BRIDGE (C. DARROW BRIDGE) 6. MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY (CHICAGO LANDMARK) 7. PERRENIAL GARDEN 8. CHENEY GOODE MEMORIAL BENCH 9. 59TH/60TH STREET VIADUCT 10. MASARYK MONUMENT 11. LINNE MONUMENT 12. ENGLISH COMFORT STATION 13. JAPANESE GARDEN 14. SHELTER/COMFORT STATION (DRIVING RANGE COMFORT STATION) 15. 59TH STREET INLET BRIDGE 16. MIDDLE BRIDGE (HAYES DRIVE BRIDGE) 17. SOUTHERN SHORE YACHT CLUB 18. LIFE SAVING STATION (COAST GUARD STATION 19. STATUE OF THE REPUBLIC (CHICAGO LANDMARK) 20. CECIL PARTEE GOLF SHELTER 21. MAINTENANCE BUILDING 22. JACKSON PARK FIELD HOUSE 23. JACKSON PARK YACHT CLUB 24. LA RABIDA CHILDREN S HOSPITAL 25. GOLF SHELTER 26. SOUTH HAVEN BRIDGE (ANIMAL BRIDGE) 27. 63RD STREET BEACH HOUSE (CHICAGO LANDMARK) 33

HISTORIC FEATURES Landscape Features Circulation Roads + Paths Golf Course Berms + Sunken Lawn Panels Historic Walls + Balustrades Paved Granite Beach/Beaches Japanese Garden Perennial Garden Naturalistic Designs Plantings and waterway systems including lagoons, harbors and islands 34

HISTORIC FEATURES Buildings + Structures Museum of Science and Industry; 1893 Designated Chicago Landmark 63 rd Street Bathing Pavilion; 1919 Designated Chicago Landmark Music Court Comfort Station; 1888/1936 La Rabida Children s Hospital; 1932 Jackson Park Fieldhouse; 1957 Iowa Building; 1936-40 9 th Hole Golf Shelter; 1912 English Comfort Station; 1934 35

HISTORIC FEATURES Buildings + Structures Jackson Park Yacht Club; 1906-30 Life Saving (Coast Guard) Stn; 1906 Bowling Green Clubhouse, 1927 Southern Shore Yacht Club; 1934 Cecil Partee Golf Shelter; 1900 Shelter/Comfort Station; 1936 (Driving Range) Maintenance Building; 1936 36

HISTORIC FEATURES Bridges C. Darrow Bridge; 1880; 1893-5; 1957-63 59 th Street Inlet Bridge; 1895 South Haven Bridge (Animal Bridge); 1904 59 th /60 th Street Viaduct; 1893 Hayes Drive Lagoon Bridge; 1901 Music Court Bridge; 1904-06 37

HISTORIC FEATURES Monuments Masaryk Monument; 1955 Linne Monument; 1891/1976 Statue of the Republic; 1918 Designated Chicago Landmark Cheney Goode Memorial Bench; 1932 38

Next Steps 39

NEXT STEPS Section 106 Process (as outlined by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP)) 1. INITIATE the process Completed Determine the undertaking Coordinate with other reviews Identify consulting parties Develop public input opportunities 2. IDENTIFY historic resources Today through Spring 2018 Determine Area of Potential Effect (APE) Reasonable identification of historic resources & eligibility Review with consulting parties 3. ASSESS is adverse effects Spring/Summer 2018 Apply criteria of adverse effects Review with consulting parties 4. RESOLVE adverse effects (if needed Summer/Fall 2018 See handout for more detail Develop alternatives to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects Review with consulting parties Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) PROCEED WITH PROPOSED PROJECT https://tinyurl.com/jpimprovements 40

NEXT STEPS Historic Properties Inventory Report Project team identifies potential historic properties (eligible and listed in the NRHP) in the APE Prepares document (Historic Properties Inventory Report) Photos of resources Analysis of historic eligibility Report reviewed by public and consulting parties provide comments In consultation with the SHPO, FHWA makes eligibility determinations All Consulting Parties will receive a copy of the Historic Properties Inventory Report by email at least a week prior to the next meeting 41

NEXT STEPS Next Meeting 1. Please Come Prepared to discuss the Historic Properties Inventory Report 2. Group discussion on Historic Properties Inventory Report 3. Start to assess effects to historic properties 42

NEXT STEPS Additional Information Website URL (for questions and comments): https://tinyurl.com/jpimprovements Be sure we have your email address in order to receive Section 106 updates All Section 106 and NEPA meeting dates will be posted online as confirmed DPD and CDOT Contacts Eleanor Gorski and Abby Monroe John Sadler 43

Participant Feedback 44

PARTICIPANT FEEDBACK Are there any questions about the Section 106 process? 45

PARTICIPANT FEEDBACK See handout for detailed list Are there any historic features to add to the list? 46

PARTICIPANT FEEDBACK Display Posters Historic Maps of Jackson Park and the Midway Draft Area of Potential Effect Maps Proposed Roadway Improvements Proposed OPC Site Plan Currently Identified Historic Features Map 47

Thank you! 48