City of Waco Stormwater Management Regulations

Similar documents
MANUAL OF DESIGN, INSTALLATION, AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS

When planning stormwater management facilities, the following principles shall be applied where possible.

WQ-23 MOUNTAINOUS AND STEEP SLOPE SITES

5. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS

Washington County, Maryland Division of Public Works Policy Manual

STREAM BUFFERS

SITE PLAN REVIEW ITEMS - REFERENCE CHECKLIST

SEMSWA s Role in the Land Development Process

CHECKLIST FOR PHASE II DRAINAGE REPORT

Lincoln 270. City of Lincoln. Stormwater Management Plan. April 2, 2013

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CODES ANALYSIS RICHLAND COUNTY, SC SITE PLANNING ROUNDTABLE

Erosion & Sediment Control Plan Application Form & Checklist

A. Regional Detention Requirements

Stormwater Management Resource Type:

Draft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

Chapter 1: General Program Information

TOWNSHIP OF LOGAN SOIL & FILL IMPORTATION AND PLACEMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

Pollutant Removal Benefits

City of Stoughton Erosion Control Permit Application (effective 2/6/2018)

SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST

Checklists. Project Name: Location: File Number: Date of Submittal: Reviewer: Date: Applicant: Contact Name: Phone Number:

Chapter 3 Site Planning and Low Impact Development

Zoning Ordinance Article 3

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT LATHAM 200 MMSCFD GAS PROCESSING PLANT

6.1. INTRODUCTION 6.2. EXISTING CONDITIONS

Chapter 4 - Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans

STORMWATER REPORT FOR WALMART SUPERCENTER STORE # SIOUX FALLS, LINCOLN COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA BFA PROJECT NO

Town of Windsor. Stormwater Manual

IMPLEMENTING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT

Section 11 Grading and Drainage Standards

Existing Conditions and Environmental Consequences Floodplains

Problem Understanding

MASTER DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE PLAN FOR MONUMENT HEIGHTS

Part 4: CRS Stormwater Management Activity (450) and Urban Flooding Best Practices

Huntington Stormwater Utility

CHAPTER 5: SITE DEVELOPMENT

ST. MARY S SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT (SMSCD) AND DPW&T CONCEPT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES AND CHECKLIST

Section 3 Non-Structural BMPs

Zoning Ordinance Chapter 10

SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES Drainage Design Options for street right of ways.

ORDINANCE NUMBER DRAFT. An ordinance amending Title 12 Environmental Protection of the Los Angeles County

APPENDIX A SIMPLIFIED APPROACH TO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FOR SMALL PROJECTS. In West Sadsbury Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania

Stormwater Regulations & Considerations Morse Study Area. Pam Fortun, P.E. CFM Senior Stormwater Treatment Engineer Engineering Services Division

Appendix I. Checklists

Tennessee Stormwater Management Program. Stormwater Management Site Assessment and Inventory Checklist. Quick Check o Vicinity Map within Watershed

Article 20 Stormwater Management

CHAPTER 9 STORM DRAINAGE. Minimum Requirements for New Development and Redevelopment

DRAFT DESIGN CRITERIA STORMWATER TREATMENT STANDARDS CITY OF OVERLAND PARK

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY STORMWATER PROGRAM

County Council Of Howard County, Maryland

City of Fort Worth. December 1, 2004

STREAM BUFFER PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT

STAFFORD TRACT NORTH OF US90A 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 OBJECTIVE

4. CONCEPT PLAN DEVELOPMENT

STORMWATER SITE PLAN INSTRUCTIONS AND SUBMITTAL TEMPLATE Medium and Large Projects

Table of Contents G.1.a Water Resources - Surface Water - Drainage

Stormwater Retrofitting: The Art of Opportunity. Presented by the Center for Watershed Protection

Floodplain Technical Memorandum

8.5 FLOODING. Environmental Setting

NAPA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Standards & Specifications

6.1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

Plan Review Checklist

PAVING PARKING AREAS AND ROADS DESCRIPTION. Alternate Names: Pavement Practices, Impervious Paving

APPENDIX E. Flood Plain Management

Understanding Drainage Options What s Feasible and Legal. February 2019

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY STORMWATER PROGRAM

DIVISION E ENGINEERING STANDARDS

LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN. APPENDIX G - Stormwater Study Findings & Stormwater Solutions

SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL

October 7, City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303) RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report

STORMWATER UTILITY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Appendix E Preliminary Location Hydraulic Study

Section General Tree Preservation Requirements for New Nonresidential and Residential Development

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

Stormwater Management Techniques WMPF LAND USE TRAINING INSTITUTE MARCH 14, 2018

Tools for Managing Local Drainage Issues: Land Use Regulations / Driveway Standards.

C. WATER. 1. Surface Water Runoff. See Section C.3, Flood Hazard/Mudflow Hazard, page Ground Water

CITY OF ST. AUGUSTA STEARNS COUNTY MINNESOTA ORDIANCE NO AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Part 5. Environmental Protection Overlay District Regulations

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: FINAL PLAN REVIEW- PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP)

COLUMBIA COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COURTHOUSE 230 STRAND ST. HELENS, OREGON (503) General Application

Figure 1 Cypress Street Study Area Location Map

New Development Stormwater Guidelines

CITY OF TUMWATER 555 ISRAEL RD. SW, TUMWATER, WA (360) (360) (FAX)

South Bismarck Watershed Model Update and Stormwater Improvement Project

Understanding Stormwater Drainage Maintenance

City of O Fallon, Missouri Stormwater Management Policy

Sanford/Lee County Technical Review Committee (TRC) DEADLINES & MEETING DATES

Project: Mooney Lake Preserve Received: Location: 300 Sixth Ave. N., Orono Complete: Noticed:

Please highlight flow chart where applicable and return with Form 2 and Form 3 (tab 1) to the City of St. Charles Engineering Department.

Gloucester County PLAN SUBMITTER'S CHECKLIST

Review Zone Application for D&R Canal Commission Decision

Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual

Chapter 14. Stormwater Quality Introduction

HIGHLAND LAKES WATERSHED ORDINANCE WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL MANUAL

What Can We Do to Reduce the Impact of Floods? Joe Barron, P.E. Fletcher Group, Inc. 148 River St. Suite 220 Greenville, S.C.

Protocol for Sustainable Roadsides

Preliminary Sediment & Stormwater Management Plan Review Checklist DATE RECEIVED: PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME:

Florence County Small Commercial Land Disturbance Permit Application

Plat Requirements CHECKLIST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW

Transcription:

1.0 Applicability: City of Waco Stormwater Management Regulations These regulations apply to all development within the limits of the City of Waco as well as to any subdivisions within the extra territorial jurisdiction of the City of Waco. Any request for a variance from these regulations must be justified by sound Engineering practice. Other than those variances identified in these regulations as being at the discretion of the City Engineer, variances may only be granted as provided in the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Waco or Chapter 28 Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Waco, as applicable. 1.1 Definitions: 100 year Floodplain Area inundated by the flood having a one percent chance of being exceeded in any one year (Base Flood). (Also known as Regulatory Flood Plain) Adverse Impact: Any impact which causes any of the following: Any increased inundation, of any building structure, roadway, or improvement. Any increase in erosion and/or sedimentation. Any increase in the upstream or downstream floodplane level. Any increase in the upstream or downstream floodplain boundaries. Floodplane Elevation Drainage System Treatment The calculated elevation of floodwaters caused by the flood of a particular frequency. System made up of pipes, ditches, streets and other structures designed to contain and transport surface water generated by a storm event. Removal/partial removal of pollutants from stormwater. Watercourse a natural or manmade channel, ditch, or swale where water flows either continuously or during rainfall events 1.2 Adverse Impact No preliminary or final plat or development plan or permit shall be approved that will cause an adverse drainage impact on any other property, based on the 2 yr, 10 1

yr, 25 yr and 100 yr floods. Potential damage must be assessed downstream from the site until the site drainage area comprises 10% or less of the total drainage area. 1.3 Design Storm Frequency All streets, curb and gutter, roadside ditches, inlets, and storm drains shall be designed to intercept and convey the peak discharge from a 5 year frequency storm. Inundation of streets will be allowed subject to the requirements of the appropriate section of the Storm Drainage Design Manual. In addition to the above, the drainage system shall be designed to convey the peak flow generated from the 100-year frequency storm within dedicated rights-of-way or easements. Culverts shall be designed on the storm frequency shown in the appropriate section of the Storm Drainage Design Manual. 1.4 Stormwater Detention Predeveloped peak flows from the site generated from the 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year storm frequencies shall not be increased. For developments of two acres or more, the peak flows from the 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year storms shall be detained in on-site stormwater detention basins with release rates equal to, or less than the flows generated from the site for the 2, 10, and 100-year storm events when the site was in its pre developed state. Development sites within a watershed where a regional detention facility exists or is planned shall be eligible to participate in that regional facility. Fees for participation shall be assessed based on the area of the development compared to the total area of the watershed. The City Engineer shall have the authority to waive the requirement for on-site detention, provided that at least one of the following conditions is met: 1. The development is eligible, and commits to financially participate in an approved Regional Stormwater Management Program. Under this provision, the applicant shall demonstrate that the peak, post-developed runoff generated from the 100-year storm can be conveyed downstream to the Regional Facility and not impact adversely any downstream properties 2. The development is near Lake Waco, Lake Brazos, the North Bosque River, the Middle Bosque River, the South Bosque River, or the Brazos River, and lies immediately adjacent to a drainage system that has sufficient capacity to convey the site s post-developed peak discharge from the 100-year storm event without creating an adverse impact (as previously defined) on any other properties. The discharge in the system shall be determined by using the 100-year storm event with the post- 2

developed site and the remainder of the watershed in its existing state at the time of development (first come - first served). 3. It can be demonstrated, by Engineering calculations, that there will be no adverse impact on other properties if detention is not provided. 4. The development is single family residential, involves no street construction and consists of no more than two single family residential structures. All stormwater detention facilities (on-site and regional) shall be designed to enhance stormwater quality in addition to reducing peak flows. All detention facilities shall be dual purpose for detention and treatment and shall, at a minimum, be designed to retain the first one half inch per impervious acre of run off permanently and allow it to percolate into the soil. If the soil conditions are such that the runoff will not percolate into the soil within 24 hours then other methods, based on accepted Best Management Practices, must be utilized. In earthen detention/retention facilities and in open channels, the preferred ground cover is grass. The following varieties are acceptable: Full Sun Buffalo Grass Curly-Mesquite Blue Grama Seep Muhly Partial Shade Sideoates Grama Eastern Gamagrass Little Bluestem Green Sprangletop Regional and on-site detention facilities and a 5 ft strip around the perimeter for access shall be contained within dedicated rights-of-way or easement. All weather access drives from a public street must be provided and contained within dedicated right-of-way or an easement. Detention/Retention facilities must operate by gravity; no pumping will be allowed. Dams/Berms for detention facilities must be designed by a licensed professional engineer with specifications for construction materials. 1.5 Floodplain Management The intent of these regulations is to leave watercourses in a natural condition. While this is the intent, the developer may, upon approval of the City Engineer, change the location of existing channels and thus the location of the floodplain subject to the requirements of Section 1.7 of these regulations. 3

All development must comply with Chapter 11 Flood Prevention and Protection of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Waco, Texas. Fences will not be allowed inside floodplains. If development is planned within a floodplain the developer must mitigate any adverse impact on any other property and redelineate the floodplain based on the mitigation implemented. The ultimate floodplain delineation shall be based on the watershed contributing to the design point assuming upstream properties provide adequate detention. All floodplains shall be computed utilizing the computer software and methodologies outlined in the Storm Drainage Design Manual. 1.6 Survey Control Delineation of drainage areas may be based on City of Waco aerial topographic maps. Cross sections for determining depth and width of flow in channels must be based on field surveys (on the ground) U.S.G.S. Quadrangle Maps will not be allowed. All field surveys shall be related to FEMA approved vertical datum and Horizontal State Plane Coordinates (SPC). 1.7 Open Channels As stated in Section 1.5, the intent of these regulations is to leave watercourses in their natural state. If the developer desires to alter the natural drainage channel, developer must justify the request to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. If alteration is approved by the City, the channel should follow the existing course as much as possible. Channelization of watercourses shall be in accordance with all state and federal laws. In detention/retention facilities and open channels, the preferred ground cover is grass. The following varieties are acceptable: Full Sun Buffalo Grass Curly-Mesquite Blue Grama Seep Muhly Partial Shade Sideoates Grama Eastern Gamagrass Little Bluestem Green Sprangletop 4

Channels must be designed so there is no adverse impact on the upstream, downstream, or adjacent properties. (See Section 1.2). The maximum side slope on earthen drainage channels will be six horizontal to one vertical (6:1). Open channels shall be designed to convey the peak discharge from the storm event shown in the appropriate section of the Storm Drainage Design Manual with one foot of freeboard. This peak discharge will be based upon watershed contributing to the point of consideration assuming upstream properties provide adequate detention. Open channels shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City of Waco Storm Drainage Design Manual so as to promote stormwater quality by limiting erosion and sedimentation. The use of concrete channel lining shall be prohibited (not including drop structures and pilot channels). The City Engineer is authorized to accept, or mandate, concrete channel lining in severe conditions on a case-by-case basis. Open channels and detention facilities shall be wholly contained within dedicated rights-of-way or easements with an additional 5 easement on each side for access. A driveway access must be provided from a public street and must be contained within dedicated right-of-way or an easement. 1.8 Grading Plan All development plans must include an overall site grading plan showing existing and proposed contours for the entire development. The plan must also include finish floor elevations for all proposed structures. Final building plans must conform to the overall plan. 1.9 Drainage Systems Storm drains must be extended to connect to the nearest existing receiving facility such as another storm drain, roadside ditch, or natural stream. If the receiving facility is a storm drain or roadside ditch, designed to meet the design criteria in place at the time that facility was constructed, there will be no requirement to upgrade that facility to meet new standards unless the new development itself causes the receiving facility to be undersized. 1.10 Maintenance 5

The City will maintain drainage facilities that serve more than one property. The property owner will maintain drainage facilities that serve one property. Mowing will not require a permit; however no excavation may be performed nor fill placed in an easement or floodplain without a permit. The City will perform major maintenance (e.g. dam maintenance, dredging) on detention facilities. The City will maintain drainage facilities, including mowing, within dedicated parks. No maintenance may be performed within an identified wetlands prior to obtaining a permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers. 1.11 Dam Safety Act Any berm that is over 25 feet high and impounds more than 15 acre feet OR is over 6 feet high and impounds over 50 acre feet is subject to the dam safety act and will require a permit from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. 1.12 Redevelopment Any area that has been previously developed and is being resubdivided or redeveloped must meet the requirements of these regulations to the extent practicable. The City Engineer will review redevelopment on a case by case basis and determine the extent to which compliance with these regulations will be required. 6