Planning Commission Staff Report March 15, 2007

Similar documents
Planning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008

Planning Commission Staff Report February 19, 2009

7700 College Town Drive, Suite Ninth Street, Suite 212 Sacramento, CA Sacramento, CA 95814

4.0 LAND USE 4.1 EXISTING SETTING CITY OF ELK GROVE PROJECT AREA

Staff Report and Recommendation

PLANNING COMMISSION. Submitted

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

2 Project Description

CHAPTER 2 SUMMARY 1. PROJECT SUMMARY DATA

4.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED

Land Use element LAND USE POLICY AREAS ESTATE AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL AREAS/RURAL SHELDON AREA OLD TOWN ELK GROVE

01 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Land Use Element. policy areas are discussed in this Element:

Southeast Policy Area Community Plan

Parks, Trails, and Open space Element

5.1 AESTHETICS, LIGHT, AND GLARE

Parks, Trails, and Open Space Element

Planning Commission Staff Report February 20, 2014

EXHIBIT A. Chapter 2.7 SPECIAL PLANNED DISTRICTS. Article XVIII 15th Street School Master Planned Development

BROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION

NOTICE OF PREPARATION

VANDEN MEADOWS SPECIFIC PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION SUMMARY Schools Foxboro Parkway

Access Management: An Overview

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

VANDEN MEADOWS SPECIFIC PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION SUMMARY Schools Foxboro Parkway

CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - CITY OF MARYLAND HEIGHTS

Planning Commission Staff Report February 5, 2015

KEIZER STATION PLAN INTRODUCTION

PC RESOLUTION NO

City Of Sparks Planning Commission Item

Northwest Rail Corridor and US 36 BRT Development Oriented Transit Analysis 4.4 STATION AREA FINDINGS

LOS ANGELES CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

Green Gables. April 24, 2013

Jackson Highway Master Plans

Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner

SPECIFIC PLAN Requirements

CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION

Planning and Design Commission Report

Be it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Guilderland that the following new A (Transit Oriented Development (TOD) District) is adopted:

Southeast Policy Area Community Plan

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017

#8) T-1409 CENTENNIAL & LAMB TENTATIVE MAP

Rapid City Planning Commission Rezoning Project Report

CONSENT CALENDAR CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM NO: A.1, A.2 STAFF: LARRY LARSEN

A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 9, KAUAI COUNTY CODE 1987, RELATING TO STREET REQUIRE:MENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS

Baumgarten MPUD. Exhibit 3 Evaluation Criteria

Planning Districts INTRODUCTION

Mitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative. Introduction

14 October 10, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MPB, INC

Drexel, Barrell & Co.

MINUTES OF THE TOWN COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 1, 2016

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

Design Review Application *Please call prior to submittal meeting to determine applicable fees*

SUSSEX COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WORKSHOP

3. Project Description

PROTOTYPE DESIGN/INTRODUCTION

Planning Commission Staff Report January 21, 2016

Planning Commission Staff Report May 7, 2015

Property Profile 2954 WEST FRANKLIN ROAD MERIDIAN, ID

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND SCOPING MEETING FOR THE LAND PARK COMMERCIAL CENTER PROJECT

THAT the attached Terms of Reference for the Thornhill Centre Street Study be approved.

Bylaw No. B-03/2011 Adopted by Airdrie City Council February 21, 2012

I. INTRODUCTION. Project Background and Study Area

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Conduct Public Hearing to vacate certain public right of way adjacent to Sycamore Avenue and San Pablo Avenue

Development Guidelines - Florin-Vineyard Community Plan Administrative Draft

RRW Stonebrook, LLC Tentative Map Findings

ADOPTED AT NOVEMBER 15, 2012 PACC MEETING

ARGENTA TRAIL (CSAH 28/63) REALIGNMENT SOUTH PROJECT (CP 63-25)

SOUTH NATOMAS COMMUNITY PLAN

III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Introduction T. This Background Report does not include goals, policies, or programs

Department of Community Development. Planning and Environmental Review Division Revised Notice of Preparation

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

Selected Area Study. Vision Plan Draft

Drexel, Barrell & Co.

Urban Planning and Land Use

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT PLACERVILLE OFFICE:

ELK GROVE TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES

STAFF SUMMARY FOR S17-02 SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION

Planning Commission Staff Report May 31, 2007

SECTION 2.0 INTRODUCTION

General Location Courtyard at LMH Final Development Plan and Final Plat

Major Subdivision Sketch Plan Checklist

AVANTI SOUTH. SPECIFIC PLAN June Prepared for: Applicant: Royal Investors Group, LLC

Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan

O Dell Parkway PUD Association, Inc. PO Box 1335

OP Council Resolution June 16, Planning and Development Services

Planning Commission Staff Report Agenda Item No. 4 March 7, 2019

4.500 Preston Road Overlay District

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PUD For The Proposed Antietam Subdivision Escambia County, Florida. Introduction

elk grove design guidelines Table Contents

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH STAFF REPORT. THROUGH: Marisa Lundstedt, Director of Community Development

PDR /21/15 Noah Beals 1/7/15 xx

SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')

Chapter Master Planned Communities (MPC) District

REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION City of Sacramento

Burton Station Village Community Meeting February 26, 2014

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

Transcription:

Planning Commission Staff Report Project: Request: Madeira East Tentative Subdivision Map, Design Review for Subdivision Layout & Abandonment of Easements Location: Phase IV of the Laguna Ridge Specific Plan encompassing 239.3 acres at the northwest corner of West Stockton Blvd. and future Whitelock Parkway APN: 132-0280-008, 014, 015 & 132-0290-029 File: Planner: EG-03-481 Darcy Goulart Applicant / Owner Reynen & Bardis Development LLC Mr. Mike Winn 10660 Mather Blvd. Mather Field, CA 95655 Representative MacKay and Somps Mr. Bruce Walters 1771 Tribute Road, Suite E Sacramento, CA 95815 Staff Recommendation The Planning Commission approve the Tentative Subdivision Map, Design Review for subdivision layout and Abandonment of various easements for Madeira East (EG-03-481) subject to the findings and conditions of approval contained in the staff report. Project Description The project consists of a Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide the 239.3 acre site to create 875 single family lots consisting of 331 RD-7 lots lots, 433 RD-5 lots, and 111 RD-4 lots consistent with the adopted Laguna Ridge Specific Plan. The map will also create 3 park lots, 4 parkway lots, 6 landscape lots, 15 BP zoned lots for future office development, 1 SMUD substation reservation lot, 2 interchange reservation lots and 1 Water Treatment Plant reservation lot. The project also includes a Design Review for subdivision layout for consistency with the City-wide Design Guidelines as well as the Laguna Ridge Supplemental Design Guidelines. This project also consists of the abandonment of utility easements, road easements and ingress/egress easements within the boundaries of the project site. Background The Laguna Ridge Specific Plan (LRSP), approved by City Council in June 2004, encompasses approximately 1,900 acres and is located in the southwestern portion of the City. The LRSP lies west of Highway 99, south of Elk Grove Boulevard, east of Bruceville Road and the East Franklin Specific Plan area, and north of Bilby Road. Future land uses within the LRSP include single and multi-family residential, commercial, office, and a civic center set amongst connective paseos, pedestrian corridors, and world class parks. The LRSP is divided into four phases of development. With the exception of Phase I (combination Middle School/High School), phases will be planned with a village concept, consisting of a school and park as the main focal element, surrounded by a number of neighborhoods. Each phase will be served by adequate infrastructure before a single residence can be occupied.

Page 2 Following approval of the LRSP, staff coordinated with the Owner s Group to develop a composite map for the entire Laguna Ridge area. The purpose of the composite map was to ensure that the build out of the LRSP is accomplished in a manner that ensures various subdivisions are well integrated and create neighborhoods with a strong sense of community. Circulation facilities, including roadways and pedestrian facilities, are provided throughout the LRSP to create a cohesive and interconnected community notwithstanding individual project boundaries. Laguna Ridge Specific Plan Land Use Map Project Site

Page 3 The Madeira East site within the LRSP has historically been used for agricultural purposes and is currently occupied by several rural residences. The presence of sensitive species and wetland resources in the Plan area is limited due to previous agricultural disturbance. A number of oak trees, located along fence lines and property boundaries, will be retained and/or relocated as part of development of the plan and evaluated on a project-specific basis. Analysis Tentative Subdivision Map The LRSP identifies several different land uses within Madeira East project site. Zoning for the site includes RD-4, RD-5, RD-7, BP, LP and Parkway. The proposed tentative subdivision map is consistent with the Elk Grove General Plan, the Laguna Ridge Specific Plan, and all applicable zoning code requirements and subdivision regulations. Approval of the tentative subdivision map would create the following lots: 875 Single Family Residential Lots o 131 42-44 x 80 typ lots o 200 45 x 105 typ lots o 308 55 x 105 typ lots o 125 60 x 105 typ lots o 111 70 x 122 typ lots 3 Local Park Lots 4 Parkway Lots 6 Landscape Corridor Lots 15 BP zoned lots 1 SMUD Substation Reservation Lot 2 Interchange Reservation Lots 1 Water Treatment Plant Reservation Lot The project site encompasses approximately 239.3 acres of Phase IV of the LRSP area. The general project site location is south of Auto Mall Phase III, east of the High School/Middle School and west of Highway 99. There is a portion of Madeira East located south of Whitelock Parkway which includes 83 of the 875 residential lots and one of the three local parks. Proposed development within the boundaries of the tentative map will consistent of low density single family residential uses and lots to accommodate three local parks, a SMUD substation and a Water Treatment Plant. The map also includes 15 lots to accommodate future development of office buildings. Of the 875 residential lots shown on the map, 34 of those lots are lotted out in the event that the Water Treatment Plant is no longer needed. Including these lots on the map allows the applicant to submit a final map without having to go through the tentative map approval process if the WTP is no longer needed. The layout provided would extend F Way to the south, which would then loop back up to H Way. The proposed lotting pattern fits in with the surrounding lots and would create lots of sufficient size for residential development. The 0.56 acre SMUD substation is located in the southwest corner of the map. The residential layout of the project has been designed cohesively so that unpleasing, visible separation of neighborhoods does not occur, in accordance with the subdivision design standards of the LRSP. Pedestrian connectivity is provided throughout the project through the proposed installation of sidewalks, landscape corridors with pedestrian pathways, and a north/south parkway that runs through the middle of the project site. This parkway leads to a centrally located 5.1 acre local park. Pedestrian access will also be provided within the

Page 4 drainage corridor along Whitelock Parkway. This corridor runs the entire length of Whitelock Parkway from Bruceville Road to Lotz Parkway allowing pedestrians to utilize all of the open space amenities that the LRSP has to offer. Vehicular access through the project site will be provided in several locations along two major arterial roadways, including three entries on Lotz Parkway, and three entries on Whitelock Parkway. Internal streets have been planned to achieve efficient access throughout the various neighborhoods. Staff realized that D Drive was approximately 80 off set to the west of the future extension of Auto Center Drive from the north of the project site. The intersection of Auto Center Drive has already been set with left-out movements and the 80 off set between the two intersections would pose ingress/egress conflicts. Therefore, staff has included a condition to require the applicant to align D Drive and Lotz Parkway with the existing Auto Center Drive where it intersects with Lotz Parkway. This will become a signalized intersection with full ingress/egress movements for Madeira East and the Auto Mall. Staff does have concerns with the layout of that portion of Madeira East that is located south of Whitelock Parkway. This area includes 83 single family residential lots and a 1.3 acre local park. The properties surrounding this portion of Madeira East are nonparticipating property owners. Staff believes that the site and surrounding properties would be best served if the park were centrally located on the Madeira East piece with several road connections to the east and west. Staff would recommend that the project be approved with modifications to this portion of Madeira East to include a centrally located park and road connections to the east and west.

Page 5 Madeira East Tentative Subdivision Map Infrastructure Conditions The conditions of approval included in Attachment A require the Madeira East project to provide infrastructure adequate to meet the demands of the project. As previously mentioned Madeira East is located within Phase IV of the LRSP. At the request of the applicant, Public Works staff reviewed the infrastructure requirements included in the Infrastructure Phasing Matrix in relation to Phase IV projects. The Infrastructure Phasing Matrix assumed that Phase III would develop prior to Phase IV and so all Phase III infrastructure was required for development of Phase IV. It was determined by Public Works staff that the infrastructure need of Phase IV are independent of Phase III, within the exception of the off-site roadway connection to the south. Madeira East has been conditioned accordingly to provide only that infrastructure that is needed for the project site. This includes water, sewer and road improvements to Big Horn (Whitelock Parkway to Bilby Road), Whitelock Parkway (Big Horn to West Stockton), Laguna Springs Drive (full width improvements) and the off-site roadway connection to the south, which

Page 6 includes Big Horn from Bilby to Kammerer and Kammerer from Big Horn to West Stockton Blvd. Overall, the project will provide adequate infrastructure to support the demands associated with the development of Phase IV. Environmental Analysis The Laguna Ridge Specific Plan was approved and an Environmental Impact Report adopted by the City council on June 16, 2004. The EIR adequately addressed environmental issues related to the development of the subject property. The Madeira East project is being undertaken pursuant to and in conformity with the approved Specific Plan. No special circumstances exist and no changes in the project have occurred that would necessitate the preparation of subsequent environmental review. No additional environmental impacts have been identified for the project site other than those previously disclosed and analyzed in the Laguna Ridge Specific Plan EIR. Madeira East is subject to the Laguna Ridge Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and a condition of approval is included which requires recordation of the MMRP. Consequently, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182, no further environmental review is required for this project. Summary Staff reviewed the applicant s request for a Tentative Subdivision Map, Design Review for subdivision layout and the abandonment of numerous easements for the Madeira East project. The project has been analyzed according to the policies and goals of the Elk Grove General Plan and the Laguna Ridge Specific Plan. The project design as well as the attached conditions of approval ensures that the project will be compatible with the surrounding land uses. Staff recommends approval of the Madeira East project, subject to the attached conditions of approval and recommended design modifications to the portion of Madeira East that is located south of Whitelock Parkway. Recommended Motions I move that the Planning Commission approve the Tentative Subdivision Map, Large Lot Map, Design Review for subdivision layout and abandonment of easements for the Madeira East project (EG-03-481) subject to the findings and attached conditions of approval contained in the staff report. Findings CEQA Finding: The project will not have a significant impact on the environment because all potentially significant effects have been adequately analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report previously prepared for the Laguna Ridge Specific Plan project (EG-00-062) in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Evidence: The Laguna Ridge Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report was adopted by the City Council in June 2004. The EIR adequately addressed environmental issues related to the development of Madeira East, which conforms to the approved Specific Plan. No additional environmental impacts have been identified for Madeira East other than those previously disclosed and analyzed in the Laguna Ridge Specific Plan EIR. The project is subject to the Laguna Ridge Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and a condition of approval is

Page 7 included which requires that the MMRP be recorded. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182, no further environmental review is required for this project. General Plan Finding: The project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Elk Grove General Plan. Evidence: The General Plan identifies the site as being located within the Laguna Ridge Specific Plan. Land uses throughout the project site include Low Density Residential, Office/Multi-family, and Open Space. The project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan as well as those development policies and standards established by the Laguna Ridge Specific Plan. Tentative Subdivision Map Finding: None of the findings (a) through (g) in Section 66474 of the California Subdivision Map Act requires a City to deny approval of a tentative map apply to this project. Evidence: The above Findings #a. through #g. do not apply to the proposed Tentative Subdivision Map. a. The proposed map is consistent with the density limits as specified in the Laguna Ridge Specific Plan b. The design or improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the Laguna Ridge Specific Plan. c. The site is physically suitable for the development. The applicant is proposing a large lot/small lot subdivision that conforms to the allowable densities in the Laguna Ridge Specific Plan. d. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. The applicant is proposing a large lot/small lot subdivision that conforms to the allowable densities of the underlying zoning designations of the Laguna Ridge Specific Plan. e. The Environmental Impact Report prepared for the project determined that potential environmental impacts related to the proposed project can be mitigated less than significant levels. For those impacts which mitigation cannot reduce impacts to less than significant levels, a statement of overriding considerations has been adopted. The project will comply with all mitigation measures adopted for the Laguna Ridge Specific Plan. f. The proposed map was reviewed to ensure safe traffic flow. There are no known potentially serious health problems that will result from project implementation. g. No conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision, have been identified. Design Review Finding: The proposed layout is consistent with the Citywide Design Guidelines. Evidence: The site layout has been reviewed against the Citywide Design Guidelines for residential subdivisions and meets all applicable design requirements. The project is subject to conditions of approval that will ensure consistency with all standard requirements. Finding: The proposed site design, layout, and landscaping are suitable for the purposes of the subdivision and the site and will enhance the character of the neighborhood and community.

Page 8 Evidence: The proposed subdivision map and related plans provide all the design elements required by the Citywide Design Guidelines and the Supplemental Design Guidelines for Laguna Ridge. This includes interconnected street system, pedestrian connectivity, and sufficient open space and landscaping. The conditions of approval and subsequent design review of future residential development will ensure consistency with all standard requirements. Finding: The architecture, including the character, scale and quality of the design, relationship with the site and other buildings, building materials, colors, screening of exterior appurtenances, exterior lighting and signing and similar elements establishes a clear design concept and is compatible with the character of buildings on adjoining and nearby properties. Evidence: The project does not propose any structures. Subsequent design review of future residential and office development is required and will ensure consistency with all standard requirements. Finding: The proposed project will not create conflicts with vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian transportation modes of circulation. Evidence: The proposed subdivision and layout provides adequate off-site access and on-site circulation for vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian modes and sufficient parking for vehicles and bicycles consistent with applicable requirements. The project is subject to conditions of approval that will ensure consistency with all standard requirements and the safe integration of the project into the local transportation network. Attachments Attachment A Resolution Attachment B Project Correspondence Attachment C Project Exhibits