New Town Project of Seoul

Similar documents
Case Study of Integrated Housing and Railway Development (Kohoku New Town and Yokohama City Metro Development)

10 Implementation. Implementation. Responsibility for Implementation. Blueprint for Bloomsburg. Town of Bloomsburg Comprehensive Plan 10-1

Outline of Presentation

Making TOD Work in the Heart of Suburban Sprawl

SCARBOROUGH SUBWAY EXTENSION. Scarborough Subway Extension. Final Terms of Reference

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

City Planning based on Green Space Development in Major Asian Cities

CDAC. Update: Downtown Dartmouth Update: CDAC July 25 th Motion

2018 Northampton Township Comprehensive Plan

Strategies to Connect and Integrate Urban Planning and Environmental Planning Through Focusing On Sustainability : Case Study of Cheongju City, Korea.

Noblesville Unified Development Ordinance Audit

5 TOWN OF MARKHAM OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 144 MILLIKEN MAIN STREET SECONDARY PLAN

Planning Districts INTRODUCTION

8implementation. strategies

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION

Laberge Group. Town of Coeymans. Draft Comprehensive Plan. Overview of Planning Process

1-17 Anndale Drive, Bales Avenue and Glendora Avenue Zoning Amendment Application Preliminary Report

Planning Department. Director of Planning. Manager of Planning. Planning Technician/ Sustainability Coordinator. Planner II/ Heritage Coordinator

MAIN STREET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

Matthew F. Craigie, Project Manager

Town of Cobourg Heritage Master Plan. Statutory Public Meeting

ARISE: The Rock Renaissance Area Redevelopment & Implementation Strategy

Fossumdumpa Stovner, Oslo

Dyersville Downtown Plan. Open House October 24, 2017

TOD 101 CREATING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES WITH TRANSIT

Downtown Whitby Action Plan

Stafford County Strategic Plans

Streets for People, Place-Making and Prosperity. #TOcompletestreets

Joint Meeting City Council and the Plan Commission. September 1st, 2015

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

Richard H. Bradley Board of Directors Meeting April 25, A 21st Century Sustainability Framework

THE POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR WALKABLE COMMUNITIES. Community Technical Assistance Program Building Active Communities Institute March 2016

SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND COHESION POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Urban Policy within the framework of EU Cohesion Policy

Thailand s Eastern Seaboard Development

Vietnam Scaling up Urban Upgrading Project (SUUP)

Cambie Corridor Planning Program Phase Two Draft Plan. Standing Committee on City Services and Budgets May 5, 2011

LAND USE AMENDMENT DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL CORE (WARD 7) MACLEOD TRAIL SE AND 5 AVENUE SE BYLAW 254D2017

2016 Comprehensive Plan

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

Indonesia: Towards Habitat III and the New Urban Agenda

Economic Development & Housing Council Committee Comprehensive Plan Update September 20, 2005

FORMER CANADIAN FORCES BASE (CFB) ROCKCLIFFE SECONDARY PLAN. Official Plan Amendment XX to the Official Plan for the City of Ottawa

TOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION

City of Westbrook. 2 York Street Westbrook, Maine (207) Fax:

Mountain Resort Community Success Factors: Whistler, Canada Case Study

Allen Street Civic District Redevelopment Area Plan Redevelopment Plan & Proposal State College Planning Commission State College Redevelopment

LOS ANGELES CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

6 Strategic Vision and Vision Matrix

Welcome to the Oakridge Centre Open House

Governance Arrangements in Commercial City Districts. Some thoughts from the UK

HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Rio de Janeiro - Brazil. Urban Regeneration & Climate Change

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 TH 14 WEST STUDY AREA Project Description Functional Classification Purpose of the Project

Parks Master Plan Implementation: Phase I Waterfront Use and Design REPORT #: September 7, 2016 File #

Port Lavaca Future Land Use

Executive Summary. The Mebane CLP is not a regulatory document, but is intended to guide land development decisions. The plan includes:

MONTGOMERY COUNTY METRO STATION AREA DESIGN CHARRETTE

FOUR MILE RUN VALLEY WORKING GROUP AND CHARGE

Roosevelt Corridor. R e i n v e s t m e n t P l a n. Public Meeting Gilbert Elementary School May 12, :00 pm

The Dreispitz in Basel / Switzerland: New economy on old sites

Recent UN and EU Sustainable Development Policies (Post 2015): What challenges for city planning and governance

Encouraging collaboration:

NEW YORK AND CONNECTICUT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES. Fair Housing & Equity Assessment & Regional Planning Enhancement

Sorted citizen input comments in review of Blount County plans July, August, and September 2007

Status Update (2006 vs. Now) Citizen s Advisory Committee February Plan for Prosperity

Kinzie Industrial Corridor

Public Open House. Overview of the Downtown Plan Official Plan Amendment April 23, 2018

Town of Peru Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary

SUMMARY. An Attractive, Competitive and Sustainable GREATER MONTREAL. Draft Metropolitan Land Use and Development Plan. April 2011

Kensington Center. Public Meeting # Transit-Oriented Development, Town of Berlin, CT

City of Welland Commercial Policies. Public Information Centre March 25 th, 2009

12 Intergovernmental Coordination

Vancouver. Title of the Initiative. Initiative Duration. Submitted by. Comments by the Jury

20. Ballysadare Mini-Plan

The Five Components of the McLoughlin Area Plan

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

City of St. Thomas New Official Plan

THE TOWN OF WASAGA BEACH

A study on the regional landscape planning framework on the relationships between urban and rural areas: case study of Tokachi region, Hokkaido, Japan

WAC #7 3/14/14. Coachella General Plan Update

Intergovermental Coordination

China. City and Regional Planning in. Absorbing 50 Years of ISOCARP. Statutory Planning System In China. Planning Legislation in China

OFFICIAL CONTROLS IMPLEMENTATION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

Getting and Giving the Most

Integrated Multi Modal Public Transit Hub

6 Sub-Sector Strategies

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

Lunch Talk by ACEHK. Leveraging Consultants Innovation to Enhance Quality of Urban Renewal

IMPLEMENTING SOMERSET COUNTY S INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK

Unprecedented CBD sustainably built upon Public-Private Partnerships

Kinzie Industrial Corridor

Fareham Right to Build Expo. Richard Bacon MP. Why support Custom and Self-Build Housing?

Department of Environment and Urban Planning - We develop Linköping!

Cumberland Region Tomorrow is a private, non-profit, citizen based regional organization working with Greater Nashville Regional Council

12 AMENDMENT NO. 149, TOWN OF MARKHAM HIGHWAY 404 NORTH SECONDARY PLAN

Sustainably Repositioning Greyfield Sites. Greyfield Sites Anywhere

Transcription:

New Town Project of Seoul May 2006 Seoul Metropolitan Government (New Town Development Bureau)

CONTENTS 1 Background of New Town Development Project 2 Concept and Features of the project 3 Project Plans 4 Special Act for Urban Renewal Facilitation 5 New Town Project in Eunpyong

1 Background Seoul, the capital of the Republic of Korea seoul 01

1 Background Seoul Capital of the Chosun Dynasty - 600 years old capital dating back to the beginning of the Chosun dtnasty in 1394 - Originally a walled city situated north of Han river 1960~1970 : Rapid Urbanization and Urban Growth - Rapid urbaniztion resulted in population concentration in Seoul - Launched development of southern part of the city (south of Han river) in 1968 - Cheonggyecheon Stream in the CBD was covered with concrete 1980~mid 1990 : Urban Expansion and Sprwal - Hosted Asian Game in 1986, the Olympic Game in 1988 - Completion of development of southern part and beginning of urban sprawl Mid 1990~2003 : Imbalance between regions - Northern part of Seoul is underdeveloped compared to southern part Need for a new policy agenda setting Changes in administrative districts of Seoul 02

1 Background Gangbuk, the old center of the city In the past Gangbuk(northern part of Seoul) was the center (CBD) of Seoul 03

1 Background Development of Gangnam In 1970s Gangnam(southern part of Seoul) was developed 04

1 Background Development of Gangnam The government implemented policies to facilitate Gangnam development Restriction of Gangbuk Development - Banned specific facilities in Gangbuk - Strengthened land use and building regulations - Facilities causing population concentration ( educational institutions, public institutions etc.) were relocated into Gangnam Incentives for Gangnam Development - Offered tax relief for real estate development, while imposing tax on vacant land - Encouraged construction of medium to large-sized buildings in strategic locations - Zoned certain areas exclusively for multi-family housing complex - Invested intensively in infrastructure 05

1 Background Gangbuk marginalized in development Shortened public investment, dependence on private sector for development Insufficient urban infrastructure (roads, parks), deterioration of living condition 06

1 Background Current Status of Seoul Non- Gangnam Region Land Area : 605.41km2 Administrative districts : 25 autonomous districts Population : 3,624,000 households 10,281,000 people Land Area : 484.95km2 Administrative districts : 22 autonomous districts Population : 3,060,000 households 8,727,000 people City Hall 한 강 Gangnam Region Land Area : 120.46km2 Administrative districts : 3 autonomous districts Population : 564,000 households 1,554,000 people 07

1 Background Comparison of living quality among districts stark contrast Housing Condition(Aged housing) Ratio of housing older than 30 years - Average : 4.5% - Max : 23.4% (Jongno) - Min : 0.1 % (Gangnam) Housing prices Price of apartment(condominium) unit - Average : 7.217m Won/3.3m2 - Max : 14.58m Won (Gangnam) - Min : 4.74m Won (Geumcheon) Residents Educational background Ratio of Residents with college education and above - Average : 23.4% - Max : 40.0% (Seocho) - Min: 15.0% (Geumcheon)` Local Public Finance Financial independence index - Average : 62.4 - Max : 197.4 (Gangnam) - Min : 32.4 (Gangbuk) 08

1 Background Reasons of interregional imbalance Old downtown(gangbuk) Underdeveloped Poor urban infrastructure Financial deficit (lagged Investment) Less competitive for further development Decentralization of population Planning/Development Dependence on property tax Undeveloped land New downtown(gangnam) Development launched in 1970s High quality infrastructure Financially independent (continuous Investment) Sufficient Momentum/ Potential for development A mixture of reasons originating from policies, institutional system, and investment 09

2 Concepts and Features of New Town Project What s New Town Project? New Town In Town Not a mere redevelopment or reconstruction of old buildings, but a comprehensive renewal of built-up area (downtown and residential area) Building a community bringing people from all walks of life together Encouraging private sector to take on phased and consecutive development by block after setting up masterplan and guidelines in order to prevent disorderly development Creating high quality living environment focusing on education, culture and welfare 10

2 Concepts and Features of New Town Project Principles of development plan Environment friendliness and sustainability - Reflecting local conditions and characteristics - Ensuring consistency with upper level plans and relevant plans Advanced planning for large-scale area by public sector, followed by phased development by private sector - Urban design faithful to principles Creating multi-cores of urban activities, while giving design priority to pedestrian, bicycle and public transport - Minimizing traffic generating factors - Encouraging Mixed-used development - Ensuring concurrency between land use and inftrastructure Creating inclusionary living environment for low-income households - Diversifying public housing - Ensuring resettlement of existing residents after redevelopment 11

2 Concepts and Features of New Town Project Types of New Town Project Residential Area type Targeting residential areas packed with old housing that need improvement of living environment and basic infrastructure Urban Core type Targeting commercial or industrial areas around subway stations or along main roads to enhance efficiency of land use and rejuvenate urban functions 12

2 Concepts and Features of New Town Project Features of the Project Current state New Town Project Planning Standard Development Initiator Role of public sector Development Unit Minimun requirement Private sector Issuing necessary permissions and approvals Dispersed plots determined by profitability Comprehensive provision of infrastrucure Publi-Private Partnership Actively involved Community (Sub District) Development Method Housing redevelopment/ reconstruction method Adopting diverse methods 13

2 Concepts and Features of New Town Project Process of New Town Project Designation of target sub districts Preparing proposal for application Notice to district residents Finalization of development plan Appointing Master Planner Drawing up development plan Notice to target sub district residents Consulting with district council Submitting application to city government Screening and review and by city planning committee Notice of the final result (city government) Consultation with district planning committee Consultation with relevant organizations Consulting with district council Public hearing (target district) Request for approval of development plan (District City government) Consultation with relevant organizations Review by joint city committee of planning and architecture` Final Notice (City government) Consultation with district planning committee Project approval 14

2 Concepts and Features of New Town Project Decision-making system - Decision-making process of New Town project Relevant departments of city government consultation Working level support team consultation MP(Master Planner) -Executive MP(1) - Advisory MP(2) Advise on specialized areas Review of plans Committee for balanced regional development (Urban renewal committee) Practical comments Opinion exchange Engineers (Impact analyse etc.) consultation Engineers Land use and development plan consultation Architects (Master Plan) 15

2 Concepts and Features of New Town Project Features of New Town project The public takes the lead in establishing community development plans and designating target areas - With financial support for setting up project plans and providing infrastructure Accumulated financial support : 238.2b Won (= US$ XXX ) - 2003 : 26.8b Won - 2004 : 67.4b Won - 2005 : 130.5b Won - 2006 : 13.5b Won Additional support will be offered as detailed project plans are available 16

2 Concepts and Features of New Town Project Features of New Town project Improving quality of development plan by appointing relevant specialists as Master Planner Commissioning design work to private sector to improve design quality Minimizing dismantlement of old neighborhoods by adopting gradual and phased development scheme Strengthening public support system for the projects of public interest Task forces for New Town project are set up in both city and district governments and Project Support Centers in sub-district to provide technical advices and conciliate various conflict of interests. 17

2 Concepts and Features of New Town Project New Town Project Task Force New Town Development Bureau: 1 headquarters, 2 departments, 5 divisions 82 staffs Overall coordination of projects, sub-district designation, administrative/budget support, planning support and decision making 21 of 25 districts set up task forces and support centers Plan-making, conflict management, technical advices 102 Master Planners (34 Executive MPs, 68 Advisory MPs) General management of plan-making process, technical advices, control of contractors, concilation of interests Committee for balanced regional development : 25 members (municipal officials, city councilors and specialists) Revew and advice of development and project plans, technical advices, project area selection 18

3 Project Plans Project areas New Town Project Pilot scheme : 3 areas, 4,782,448 m2 (23 Oct. 02) - Eunpyong (3,495,248 m2 ), Gilem (950,000 m2 ), Wangsimni (337,200 m2 ) 2nd phase : 12 areas, 8,069,117 m2 (18 Nov. 03) 3rd phase : 11 areas, 10,318,829 m2 (15 Dec. 05) Location of New Town areas Location of 3rd New Town 19

3 Project Plans Expected impacts of New Town in Gangbuk Housing-to -houehold ratio(%) Gangbuk 2002 97.3 2012 103.6 (+6.3) Housing older than 30 years(%) Gangbuk 2002 5.2 2012 5.7 (+0.5) Southeast Seoul 104.5 107.3 (+2.8) Southeast Seoul 0.4 6.5 (+6.1) Road rate(%) Gangbuk 2002 20.6 2012 23.9 (+3.3) Per capita park space ( m2 /person) Gangbuk 2002 4.6 2012 6.1 (+1.5) Southeast Seoul 21.7 23.6 (+1.9) Southeast Seoul 5.8 6.3 (+0.5) 20

4 Special Act for Urban Renewal Facilitation Background - Complex legal system and administrative processes have prolonged project implementation - Diverse measures are needed to be systemized for project incentives and quality control - Flexible development methods are needed to be adopted to reflect housing market conditions Legislation Process - Special Act enacted : 05. 12. 30 - Task force for implementation launched : 06. 1. 13 - Proposal for Enforcement Decree submitted : 06. 2. 15 - Municipal Ordinance enacted : 06. 6. - Special Act effectively implemented : 06. 7. 21

4 Special Act for Urban Renewal Facilitation Special Act for Urban Renewal Facilitation Target areas: residential areas(500,000 m2 ), urban cores (200,000 m2 ) Providing national, municipal or provincial budget support to cover whole or partial costs of infrastructure investment Deregulating conditions for target area designation, floor area and building coverage ratios, requirements for school, parking space, small-sized housing units etc. Simplyfing Administrative Processes by allowing legal mandate and fiction Introducing private finance initiatives for building core facilities e.g. cultural/welfare facilities built on plots prepared for infrastructure provision 22

4 Special Act for Urban Renewal Facilitation Special Act for Urban Renewal Facilitation Appointing General Project Manager for development management Appointing Master Planner to support plan-making and implementation Preparing measures to recapture capital gains of project Offering preferential treatment to induce private schools by exempting from local taxes and development charge and allowing special account in the case of lease/sale of municipal land Preparing anti-speculation measures by regulating land transactions and building permission with target area designation 23

5 Eunpyong New Town Eunpyong New Town Project 24

5 Eunpyong New Town Location & Site 고양시덕양구 은평구 site - 10km from downtown Gateway to northwest Seoul ( Surrounded by Bukhan mountain ) - Residents : 8,721households 25,100 people` ( No. of houses: 4,691 No. of tenants: 4,030 )` 2.5km 5.0km 7.5km 25

5 Eunpyong New Town Project outline Land Area : 3,495,248m2 Project Period : Oct 2002 ~ Dec 2008 Planned Population : 15,200 households, 42,560 people Housing by types : 365 detached houses (single-family housing), 14,835 apartment units (multi-family housing) - rental units : 4,783 Housing by size (A total of 14,835 units) (1pyeong=3.3m2) - Less than 27pyeong (Net area: 18pyeong) : 3,530 units - 34 pyeong(25.7) : 6,153 units - 41 (32) ~ 65( 54) pyeong : 5,152 units 26

5 Eunpyong New Town Project objectives Resort style, eco-friendly city - Country garden-type houses in downtown - Harmonizing with nature by creating green networks and water front Futuristic community - Providing various types of housing to encourage social mix - Creating futuristic housing types of flexiblity Improving qualty of living environment - Adopting housing types that reflect life style of the 21 century - Offering state-of-the-art ICT services 27

5 Eunpyong New Town Land Use Plan District 3-1 District 1 District 2 District 3-2 Total area : 3,495.000 m2 Residential use : 1,553,000 m2 (44.5%) Commercial use Public use : 95,000 m2 (2.75%) : 1,847,000 m2 (52.8%) 29

5 Eunpyong New Town Planning Concept for District 1 Moonseong Yetgol town A town where the top of the Bukhan Mt. could be overlooked Town with residential roads Patio houses Resort style town Country houses In downtown Jingwan valley Incorporating ordinary life and leisure 30

General view 31

Patio houses 32

Linear park 33

Motjari-gol (pond village) 34

Night view (from Changneung Stream) 35

Thank you!

3 Project Plans Areas for 3 rd Phase Project Area 1,000 m2 4 1 Changshin 845 2 Emum 1001 3 3 Jangwi 1,851 5 6 1 2 3rd Phase 4 Sanggye 643 5 Susaek 877 6 Bukahyun 821 7 8 9 10 11 7 Siheung 634 8 Shingil 1,469 9 Heuksuk 898 10 Shinrim 537 11 Gyoyeo 738 Go to the previous page 19-2

1. Background Changes in administrative districts of Seoul 1394~1914 1914~1963 1973 1995 Go to the previous page 25 autonomous districts, 605.41 km2 2-1

3 Project Plans Areas for pilot scheme/ 2 nd phase new town project Area 1,000 m2 1 5 Pilot scheme 1 Eunpyong 3,495 2 Gilem 950 3 Wangsimni 337 1 Gyonam 200 2 4 2 Hannam 1,095 9 6 1 3 3 3 Jeonnong 903 4 Joonghwa 510 7 5 Mia 606 8 11 10 2 12 2nd phase 6 gajwa 1,073 7 Ahyun 1,088 8 Sinjung 700 9 Banghwa 490 10 Noryangjin 762 11 youngdengpo 12 Cheonho 226 412 Go to the previous page 19-1