Northfield and Willowbrae Community Council

Similar documents
LETTER OF OBJECTION LAND TO THE SOUTH WEST OF FORGE GARAGE, HIGH STREET, PENSHURST, KENT, TN11 8BU

Reference: 16/1447/FUL Received: 7th March 2016 Accepted: 7th March 2016 Ward: East Finchley Expiry 2nd May 2016

3 Tretawn Gardens London NW7 4NP

49 Broughton Avenue London N3 3EN

3 Abbey View Mill Hill London NW7 4PB

1. Listed Building and Conservation Area considerations 2. Protection of Known Archaeological Remains 3. Parking

Derry City and Strabane District Council Planning Committee Report

Garages To Rear Of The Willows 1025 High Road London N20 0QE

1 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans:

BLACKHEATH SQUASH CLUB Blackheath Sports Club, Rectory Field, Charlton Road, London, SE7 7EY. Planning, Design and Access Statement

PARISH / WARD: Peacehaven / Peacehaven East PROPOSAL:

Report Author/Case Officer: Paul Keen Senior Planning Officer (Dev Control) Contact Details:

18 Birkbeck Road London NW7 4AA. Reference: 15/02994/HSE Received: 14th May 2015 Accepted: 26th May 2015 Ward: Mill Hill Expiry 21st July 2015

6B Bertram Road London NW4 3PN

Perth and Kinross Council Development Management Committee 24 April 2013 Report of Handling by Development Quality Manager

Derry City and Strabane District Council Planning Committee Report

Reference: 15/06961/RCU Received: 13th November 2015 Accepted: 17th November 2015 Ward: Coppetts Expiry 12th January 2016

REFERENCE: B/03745/12 Received: 02 October 2012 Accepted: 05 October 2012 WARD(S): Totteridge Expiry: 30 November 2012.

Reference: 16/1234/HSE Received: 25th February 2016 Accepted: 2nd March 2016 Ward: High Barnet Expiry 27th April 2016

Ground Floor Flat 15 Redbourne Avenue London N3 2BP

Case Officer: Sarah Kay File No: CHE/14/00515/REM Tel. No: (01246) Plot No: 2/6132 Ctte Date: 15 th September 2014 ITEM 1

CA//16/00504/FUL. Canterbury City Council Military Road Canterbury Kent CT1 1YW. Crown copyright and database rights 2016 Ordnance Survey

6 Site Framework Strategies

Newcourt Masterplan. November Exeter Local Development Framework

DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUNGALOW AND REPLACEMENT BUNGALOW. Ms Sukhi Dhadwar

Commenting on Planning Applications: MHPRA Policy

PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT

Your ref: 1608 My ref: PA16/03150/PREAPP Date: 7 December 2016

Statement of Community Involvement LAND OFF SOUTHDOWN ROAD HORNDEAN, HAMPSHIRE

CHANGE OF USE FROM PADDOCK TO RESIDENTIAL GARDEN LAND AT Yew Tree Cottage, Timpson Lane, Clifton Reynes FOR Iain Morrison

1 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans:

Parish of Repton NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Housing development on the edge of Forres

Cookham Parish Council s Response to The Draft Local Borough Plan

DELEGATED DECISION on 1st September 2015

Derry City and Strabane District Council Planning Committee Report

BARCLAY SQUARE & MARGARET DRIVE

New Homes at Winton East

Change Paper / Date CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY

INTRODUCTION CURRENT APPLICATION

PLANNING COMMITTEE DATE: 07/09/2015 REPORT OF THE SENIOR MANAGER PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT SERVICE CAERNARFON. Number: 4

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

Planning and Regulatory Committee 20 May Applicant Local Councillor Purpose of Report

Proposed Student Accommodation Development

Section Three, Appendix 16C Medium Density Housing, Design Assessment Criteria (Residential 8A zone)

By to: 30 March Thank you for the opportunity to respond to this important consultation.

List of Policies. SESPlan. None applicable. Consolidated Scottish Borders Local Plan 2011: POLICY G1 - QUALITY STANDARDS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT

Construction of 9 dwellings and associated infrastructure.

REFERENCE: B/00601/12 Received: 11 February 2012 Accepted: 21 February 2012 WARD(S): High Barnet Expiry: 17 April 2012

THE WORTHING SOCIETY. 18 Mill Road Angmering BN16 4HT

EXTRACT FROM THE CUDDINGTON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN The Policies

PART 2 SOUTH DOWNS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY SECTION 1 SCHEDULE OF APPLICATION RECOMMENDATIONS

CHAPTER FOUR: Alternatives to the Proposed Action

2014/0590 Reg Date 26/06/2014 Chobham

LONDON BOROUGH OF WALTHAM FOREST

5 Gratton Terrace London NW2 6QE. Reference: 17/5094/HSE Received: 4th August 2017 Accepted: 7th August 2017 Ward: Childs Hill Expiry 2nd October 2017

Rev John Withy, Sion House, 120 Melmount Road, Sion Mills

2014/0943 Reg Date 06/11/2014 Lightwater

Ward: West Wittering. Proposal Change of use from public highway pavement to residential garden use.

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Planning and New Communities Director

Ullswater Court 92 Holders Hill Road London NW4 1LN

Land Adj. 63 Sunny Bank Road, Sutton Coldfield, Birmingham, B73 5RJ

Fixing the Foundations Statement

Chapter 2: OUTLINE PLANNING APPLICATION PROPOSALS. A New Garden Neighbourhood Matford Barton 17

Canterbury City Council Military Road Canterbury Kent CT1 1YW. Title: CA/16/02745/ADV. Author: Planning and Regeneration.

Longbridge Town Centre Phase 2 Planning Application

NORTH CIRCULAR ROAD - REGENERATION IN ACTION

RULE 6 (6) STATEMENT OF CASE

Section Three, Appendix 17C Multiple Unit Housing Design Assessment Criteria

Committee Date: 19/03/2015 Application Number: 2014/06414/PA Accepted: 06/01/2015 Application Type: Full Planning Target Date: 03/03/2015

Ebbsfleet Development Corporation

PHASE III: Reserved Matters Submission

Description Details submitted pursuant to discharge of condition 5 (Design Code) attached to planning permission 13/01729/OUT.

APP/G1630/W/15/

4 RESIDENTIAL ZONE. 4.1 Background

Tennis Court Rear Of 3-5 Corringway London NW11 7ED

Building Distinctive Safe and Pleasant. Better

PLANNING COMMITTEE. 14 October 2014

Mendip Local Plan Part II: Sites and Policies - Issues and Options Consultation MDC LPP2 consultation response.pdf

MATURE SUBURBS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Executive Director (Operational Services) Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities)

80 residential units with associated garages, roads and sewers. Land off South Meadow Road, Northampton,

STATEMENT OF OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF LAND AT CHURCH CLIFF DRIVE FILEY

4.3 Dudley Area Plan. Introduction. History and Existing Character. Desired Future Character for Dudley

BLETCHLEY PARK AREA - DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK

MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING HELD MONDAY 19 TH JANUARY PM BURBAGE MILLENNIUM HALL

LAND SECURITIES REDEVELOPMENT OF NEWNHAM COURT SHOPPING VILLAGE, MAIDSTONE

Site Location Plan. Land on the North West of Epsom Road Waddon Croydon. 1 : A4 September The. Waddon. Waddon.

WELLINGTON HOSPITAL DESIGN GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS

DONCASTER METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL. PLANNING COMMITTEE - 15th October Expiry Date:

Report Author/Case Officer: Joanne Horner Contact Details:

AOTEA SUPERMARKET ZONE. Zone Introduction

Tree Removal Procedure

4 Residential and Urban Living Zones

DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Director of Development Services

CAERNARFON DEPENDENCY CATCHMENT AREA

an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

Introduction to MP3. MP3 H4 Park Central (North)

2 Nelson City Council Dear Cottages

Transcription:

Northfield and Willowbrae Community Council Head of Planning and Building Standards, Services for Communities, Waverley Court, 4 East Market Street, Edinburgh, EH8 8BG 30 Piershill Terrace, Edinburgh, EH8 7BQ 12 December 2016 Dear Sir PLANNING PERMISSION: 16/05399/FUL STUDENT ACCOMMODATION AND RETAIL UNITS: 235 WILLOWBRAE ROAD 1. I refer to your letter of 22 November and now write on behalf of the Northfield and Willowbrae Community Council to convey the views of our community on this application for planning permission for development on this site. Our Consultation 2. The Community Council has only recently formed and has yet to develop the full range of systems for community engagement that it would wish to use and are enjoyed by neighbouring community councils. 3. In order to gauge public reaction, we sought views via Facebook, with a request seen by almost 1700 people with 38 reactions. These reactions were substantially about alternative uses for the site so are not directly relevant to this application. 4. We convened a public meeting, open to all, which was attended by a number of local people none of whom supported the application. We have received no representations of support. Community council members also consulted within their own neighbour networks and received no representations of support for the application. 5. Therefore, while we would have preferred a stronger community response, the views we have received are consistent in opposing the development. 6. We propose to consider the application under these headings: The Willowbrae area The site The effect on adjacent properties Conformity with Local Development Plan Policies 1

Parking Listed Buildings The Willowbrae Area 7. Willowbrae and, indeed, the whole of the community council area, is primarily a residential area of moderate density with a mixed population of retired or elderly people and families. As the application shows, it has very few higher education students and those who are here are likely to be living at home. There is little or no student community nor the facilities that students would expect to find. 8. There are 4 primary schools and a denominational high school, the Portobello High School having recently moved out of the area but its catchment covers much of the area. 9. There are few development sites and those that become available tend to be used for private housing. There is a perceived need for social housing. We suggest that the proposed of student accommodation does not reflect local housing needs; the introduction of a transient student community does not sit with the established character and residential amenity of the locality. The Site 10. There have been garages, including filling stations, on this site for many decades reflecting that the road is the A1 trunk road out of Edinburgh and carries substantial traffic at all times. Although the filling station has gone, the traffic has not. The flow past the site is heavy and is made more difficult to negotiate because of the bus lane and imminent traffic lights. It is already hazardous because of cars stopping in the bus lane to make quick purchases at the adjacent shops. 11. The retail units in the proposed development will attract a higher volume of car traffic, given the parking spaces to be provided. The significant flow of traffic leads to concerns about increase in cars turning into and out of the site. In our view, there will be more traffic for the expected retail offering than the limited number of visits to the current specialist retail operations. It is difficult to see what can be done to make this traffic safer. 12. The site is sloped falling away to the flats of Northfield Grove and the cottages of Duddingston Mill. It has been artificially levelled, presumably to provide underground space for fuel tanks in the days of the filling station. The natural land levels can be appreciated from the way the cottages in Duddingston Mills are well below the current level of the application site. Effect on Adjacent Properties 13. The size and bulk of the building is greater than anything nearby. To one side the pubs and shops are two storey, the Northfield Grove flats (some distance behind) are 5 storey but built on much lower ground and do not impact on Willowbrae Road. From behind the building will present as its full 7 storey mass. From Willowbrae Road it will 2

create a canyon effect. Overall the proposed building is well out of scale with its surroundings. Conformity with Policies 14. The Local Development Plan has a number of policies which need to be considered in relation to the proposed development. Policy Hou 8 Student Accommodation Planning permission will be granted for purpose-built student accommodation where: - The location is appropriate in terms of access to university and college facilities by walking, cycling or public transport - The proposal will not result in an excessive concentration of student accommodation (including that in the private rented sector) to an extent that would be detrimental to the maintenance of balanced communities or to the established character and residential amenity of the locality. 235. It is preferable in principle that student needs are met as far as possible in purposebuilt and managed schemes rather than the widespread conversion of family housing. Increasing the amount of purpose-built student accommodation assists the growth of the universities and the attractiveness of the city as a centre for Higher Education. In general such provision can take place at relatively high densities. Open space and car parking provision can be tailored to reflect the nature of the proposed use. However these considerations should not compromise design quality. 236 Developments should be close to the universities and colleges and accessible by public transport. In assessing the degree of concentration of student accommodation, the Council will take into account the nature of the locality in terms of mix of land use and housing types, the existing and proposed number of students in the locality. Further advice is provided in Council guidance. 15. It is not clear that there are any higher education establishments which meet the transport requirement, the walking and cycling routes to city centre facilities are not evident nor safe. Paragraph 235 carries the clear intention that purpose-built student accommodation would be in the city centre given its reference to improving the attractiveness of the city as a centre for Higher Education. Willowbrae is not in any sense close to universities and colleges. 16. We believe that Policy Hou 8 is not met. 3

Policy Des 4 Development Design Impact on Setting Planning permission will be granted for development where it is demonstrated that it will have a positive impact on its surroundings, including the character of the wider townscape and landscape, and impact on existing views, having regard to: - height and form - scale and proportions, including the spaces between buildings - position of buildings and other features on the site - materials and detailing 154 This policy applies to all new development of one or more buildings. Where the built environment is of high quality and has a settled townscape character, new development proposals will be expected to have similar characteristics to the surrounding buildings and urban grain. Where the surrounding development is fragmented or of poor quality, development proposals should help repair the urban fabric, establish model forms of development and generate coherence and distinctiveness a sense of place. The siting and design of development should also be guided by views within the wider landscape and an understanding of local landscape character, including important topographical features, e.g. prominent ridges, valleys and patterns of vegetation. 17. It cannot be said that putting a 7 storey modern building within a few metres of single storey buildings which are on the level of proposed building s basement meets any part of this policy. 18. We believe that Policy Des 4 Development Design Impact on Setting is not met. Parking 19. The 2009 Parking Standards for Development Management suggest that for student accommodation there should be 1 space per 10 beds in Zone 4. The proposed building does not provide this specifically for students the bulk of the parking is for the use of the retail units. Furthermore, Policy Hou 8 presumes that student accommodation would be in the city centre, where students would be much more likely to walk, cycle or use public transport. For Willowbrae, one of the attractions for students would be using a car for which there would be almost no parking. The local area is already used as informal park and ride making life difficult for residents adding in students to the mix would be very difficult. 20. Providing 120 cycle spaces is worthy but the bike is unlikely to be used to anything like that extent. 4

Listed Buildings 21. Centred on Duddingston Forge (listed Category B) is a group of buildings including the Duddingston Mill Cottages (listed Category C). The single storey cottages, in particular, will suffer heavily from the presence of a 7 storey neighbour the context is destroyed. It may be said that the context is already marred by the housing developments in Duddingston Mills but in reality the cottages, which form a single entity can still be appreciated as they were intended. This will be lost entirely when the backdrop is a single slab of building rising to 5 or 6 times their height. This puts their designation at risk. 22. Some adaptation to modern life have been made to the cottages with extensions to the rear. It is difficult to see that the enjoyment of these home can continue with a large commercial development so close. While they are north-facing the light available is important to these rear rooms. 23. Given the slope of the site, there are concerns about drainage into the gardens if the lie of the land is changed. There are also concerns about the effect of construction on the more fragile buildings of Duddingston Mills. Mitigations 24. The size and form of the proposed building is so incompatible with the surrounding area and its effect on traffic and road safety so uncertain that is hard to see what could be done to make this application acceptable. However, were the Council minded to give approval, we suggest the following should be included in the conditions applied: The height should be reduced to five storeys visible as only 4 from the road. Careful consideration should be given to the boundary with the cottages, averting overlooking. Landscaping may be required. The site should be managed to require that students may not reside there and own cars as has been done in some parts of Gorgie/Dalry A Planning Obligation should be imposed to fund a Road Safety Audit and implementation of ensuing recommendations to improve cycle safety and traffic access to and egress from the site. This might involve traffic lights linked to those at the Duddingston Crossroads. Preferred routes for cyclists, to Holyrood Park, Jock s Lodge and Queen Margaret University should be marked and signposted. Further study should be undertaken of how the retail space should be managed. While the application has hopes of quality retailers, it is not clear that such businesses would be interested in this location. Fast or hot food outlets should not be permitted. During vacations, when the rooms may be let to people other than students there should be no relaxation of the rules applied so limited numbers of cars allowed and a presumption that access will be by public transport. 5

Conclusion 25. We conclude that the Council cannot approve this application as it clearly contravenes the planning policies adopted in the Local Development Plan, intended to apply specifically to this kind of development. The location does not meet the guidelines for student accommodation of this type (Policy Hou 8 Student Accommodation). The building is alien to the area and takes no account of the existing community and environment (Policy Des 4 Development Design Impact on Setting) The building is damaging to the context of the adjacent listed buildings. Yours faithfully Geoff Pearson Secretary 6