The Return of the Greens in Abuja, Nigeria s New Capital City

The Return of the Greens in Abuja, Nigeria s New Capital City Ibrahim Usman JIBRIL, Nigeria Key words: Green Area, Recreational, Parks, Gardens a city-beautiful Master Plan restoration. SUMMARY When the decision to establish a new Capital City for Nigeria was taken in 1976, the founding fathers thought of creating a city-beautiful that would be sustainable in the long run. Accordingly the International Planning Associates (IPA) was commissioned to prepare a Master Plan that would guide in the development of the new City. IPA submitted it report along with the Master Plan for the City of Abuja to the Federal Government of Nigeria in 1979. The Master Plan of Abuja became the guiding principle for the orderly development of the city and has been in use in the last 30 years. Massive construction work has been going on since the early 1980s and the City has grown rapidly within this period. The implementation of this Plan is the key to the orderly development of the City. Part of the provisions of the Master Plan is the development of adequate recreational and Green Areas within the Federal Capital City (FCC) of Abuja. The City is to be developed in phases on an area of about 250 squared kilometres. The total land area for Phase I of the City is about 7076 hectares. Out of this about 1260 hectares is reserved for Greens development. This includes Open spaces, Recreational facilities, Parks, Gardens, Children playgrounds, Out door games, Sport Centers, National and District/Neighborhood parks. Others include Green stretches along valleys, Riverbeds, Hilly patches and some incidental open spaces. However, as the City grows the provisions of these Green Areas became a subject of abuse and a lot of the areas were taken over by developers and converted to other land uses thereby leading to the abuse and distortion of the Master Plan of the City. In 2003 a serious effort was embarked upon to restore the greens as per the provision of the Master Plan. This concerted effort continued up to the middle of the year 2007. This attempt at the restoration of the Master Plan, the reclaimation of the green areas and what follows after is the subject of this paper. The paper also attempts to x-ray the successes recorded, the challenges been encountered, the sustainability of the programme and the possible way forward. 1/14

The Return of the Greens in Abuja, Nigeria s New Capital City 1. INTRODUCTION Ibrahim Usman JIBRIL, Nigeria The Master Plan for the City of Abuja was prepared for the Federal Government of Nigeria by the International Planning Associates (IPA) and accepted in 1979. Full implementation of the Plan commenced in the early 1980s. This Plan is the guiding principle for the orderly development of the City and has been in use in the last 30 years. The founding fathers thought of creating a city-beautiful that would be sustainable in the long run. Massive construction work has been going on since the early 1980s and the City has grown rapidly within this period. The implementation of this Plan is the key to the orderly development of the City. Part of the provisions of the Master Plan of Abuja is the development of adequate Green Areas and other recreational facilities within the Federal Capital City (FCC) of Abuja. The City is to be developed on an area of about 250 squared kilometres. The total land area for Phase I of the City is about 7076 hectares. Out of this, about 1260 hectares is reserved for Greens development. This includes Open spaces, Recreational facilities: - such as Parks, Gardens and Children playgrounds, Out door games, Sport Centers, National and District/Neighborhood Parks. Others include Green stretches along valleys, Riverbeds, Hilly patches and some incidental open spaces. However, as the City grows the provisions of these Green Areas became a subject of abuse and a lot of the areas were taken over by developers and converted to other land uses thereby leading to the abuse and distortion of the Master Plan of the City. In 2003 a serious effort was embarked upon to restore the greens as per the provision of the Master Plan. This attempt at the restoration of the Master Plan and what follows after is the subject of this paper. The paper also attempts to x-ray the successes recorded, the challenges been encountered, the sustainability of the programme and the possible way forward. 2. PROVISIONS OF THE MASTER PLAN The basic concept of the Abuja Master Plan is the Neighbourhood Concept. The Plan provides for Residential enclave with a threshold population of 5000 people served with common facilities. This allows its inhabitants get the basic urban needs within the proximity of their varied homes. A group of neighbourhoods however form a district and the districts in turn are served by district centers with several facilities such as schools, hospitals, fire stations, etc. The Abuja Central Area Urban Design produced by the Consulting firm of Messers Kenzo- Tange and Urtec of Tokyo Japan and approved by the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) in 1981, described Open Spaces, landscaping and vista planning as closely inter-related elements. Open spaces are therefore categorized in the urban design of Abuja as:- Street Space, 2/14

Three Arms Gardens, (the three arms implies the Executive, Legislative and Judicial arms of the Federal Government of Nigeria and the locations of these buildings in the City of Abuja are known as the three arms zone ). Green Buffer Zone in the Three Arms Zone, Ministries Gardens, National Mall, National square/city Squares, Green Areas in the Cultural Zone, Pedestrian Ways (including squares and porticos), Courtyards in Ministries Zone and the Central Business District Zone, Green Zone along Expressways. The Green Areas provided for in the Master Plan made provisions for both developable and un-developable green areas. The Developable Green Areas includes:- Open Spaces, Recreational Facilities, Parks and Gardens, Children Playgrounds, Out Door Games, Sport Centers, National, District/Neighborhood Parks, While the Un-developable Green Areas includes:- Green stretches along valleys, Riverbeds, Hilly patches and Some incidental open spaces This concept of un-developable green areas does not in any way connote lack of technology or financial muscles by would-developers to turn these areas round for some form of economic activities. It is rather aimed at preserving the environment and enhancing the beauty of the City of Abuja. 3. SELECTED PARKS AND OPEN SPACES WITHIN ABUJA CITY, PHASE I As at 1998 AEPB had a list of about 41 organised open spaces in its inventory. Prominent among these list are the:- Kwame Nkurma Park in Asokoro District, ECOWAS Park in Asokoro District, AREA 1 PARK Along Ring Road 1 in Garki District, AREA 1 Mini Zoo and Park in Garki District, Area 2 Children s Park in Garki District, Sokoto Street Park in Garki District, Old Parade Ground in Garki District, Wuse Amusement Park in Wuse District, Wuse Zone 6 Park in Wuse District, Maitama Sport Complex in Maitama District, Maitama Amusement Park in Maitama District, 3/14

Figure I:- Green Overview Map Phase I Of The City Of Abuja (Source Agis 2006) Minister s hill in Maitama District. 4. WHY DO WE NEED GREENS? The motives behind the provision of the Greens in the City Plan are for good habitation, beautification and Conservation purposes. They were also created to protect hill-tops, hillsides and streams/rivers courses in their natural form. Therefore tampering with them could result in generating soil erosion, landslides, deforestation and their effects on the natural 4/14

ecology of the environment and climate protection. At the recent International Summit on Climate Change held in Copenhagen Denmark, it became clear that in addition to serious funding by Developed Economies of the World, concerted and coordinated efforts are needed by all concern in order to save the environment. Therefore the provisions of the Abuja Master Plan as it concern the preservation of the Green and the foresight shown is a commendable step, bearing in mind the fact that this effort started over thirty years ago. 5. HOW IT ALL STARTED When the initial planning and development of Abuja City started in the early 1980s, a unit for landscaping activities was set up under the Planning and Architecture Department. It was then referred to as Parks and Gardens Unit and was headed by Landscaping Architect/Planner. It was charged with the responsibilities of planting and maintenance of trees, shrubs and flowers all over the first phase of the City as it was been developed. The first public park at area one along ring road one and Tafawa Balewa way was developed. It was located at Garki District. (See figure 2 below). Figure 2: the 1 st park developed in abuja (the commercial development was cleared in 2005 but the park is yet to be restored to its proper use) (source: - ago & jibril 1999). Subsequently a plant nursery for Abuja City was developed along with other parks, as well as the soft landscaping of all major streets within the built up areas of Abuja. The activities of this unit became more pronounced with the establishment of Abuja Environmental Protection Board (AEPB) in 1985. The AEPB took over the functions of Parks and Gardens unit. With a full pledge agency the development and maintenance of Open Spaces, Parks, Gardens and other recreational facilities became more purposeful and more pronounced. 6. WHAT WENT WRONG? The AEPB continued with its activities of development and maintenance of these Green Areas of Abuja. The Board is also responsible for waste management both solid waste and 5/14

liquid sewage - of Abuja. As the City kept growing at an alarming rate, the Board started getting some problems. It was increasingly becoming more difficult to maintain these Green Areas. There was also the problem of inadequate funding as a result of competing needs. Therefore some of the green areas started receiving less attention from the Board. At the initial stage of Abuja City s development the Government was keen in developing these areas in order to set the pace and encourage private and Corporate Organizations. Therefore it was the desire of government to do- it- alone and the unwillingness of people to participate in such ventures that led to these initial problems. The few private sector participants that got involved at the initial stage did not see any economic sense in the development of greens for recreational purposes. It was discovered that most of the developers were more interested in purely commercial activities rather than recreational purposes that the areas were designated for as per the provisions of the Master Plan. A lot of the places were turned into drinking joints which in turn generated so much noise and other social vices. It was clear that the operators of most of these parks were lacking the technical know-how of running and maintaining such areas for their intended uses and put their profit motives over and above all other considerations. By the time the seat of the Federal Government moved from Lagos to Abuja in 1991, the tempo of development increased tremendously within the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). There was therefore a corresponding increase in the demand for service plots of land within the Phase I of Abuja City. The lack of such facilities within the other phases of the City contributed significantly to the pressure on the Phase 1 of Abuja City. Since this is the area that has most services roads, sewers, water, power, communications, schools and many more- the pressure became unbearable and these areas became easy targets of abuse. This scenario provided a perfect setting for series of abuses and distortions of the provisions of Abuja Master Plan as it affects the Green Areas. 7. NATURE OF THE ABUSE When it became clear that the AEPB could no longer continue with more development and management of these facilities it had no viable option than to lease these facilities out to private operators in order to optimize the uses and for the citizens to equally derive maximum benefits of the facilities. Therefore by 1998 AEPB had leased about 41 organised open spaces to various Developers and some NGOs within Phase I of Abuja City. The leases were for an initial term of 5 years. Eighteen special terms and conditions were spelt out for the beneficiaries of this arrangement. Prominent among these are that:- The space shall be developed to beautify its immediate environment. The major activities in the area must be recreational. Not more than 25% of the space shall be devoted to light commercial activities which must be hidden within the garden and must not constitute a nuisance in whatever form. The space is not convertible to other uses other than those of beautification and recreation. 6/14

There should be no permanent or residential structures at the site. Perimeter fencing that demarcates the park/garden must be of wire mesh and or chain links. Concrete or block fencing is not allowed. Pets and unguided animals as well as other until societal activities - such as smoking are not allowed into the parks. The operations of these parks must be between the hours of 6 to 22 daily. As the pressure on serviced land continued to mount on Abuja City Managers particularly through out the 1990s, AEPB started given out permission for shops to be developed on these green areas. This was in direct contravention of its own terms and conditions. As a result of this, buildings started springing up in most of these areas thereby leading to increased commercial activities. (See figure 4 below). Some of the areas were converted to residential uses while some were taken over by informal activities such as Car dealers and Auto related activities - Auto mechanics and spare parts dealers. Figure 3:squatters in one of the parks (source: ago & jibril, 1999) 8. THE TURNING POINT Figure 4: commercial development in a park (source: ago & jibril, 1999) v Such was the trend through out the 1990s up to 2003. A study conducted in 1999 for the FCDA/FCTA concluded that Phase I of Abuja City is stretched beyond acceptable limit and recommended reversal of the dangerous trend. (Ago & Jibril, 1999). It specifically recommended the recovery of most of the green areas of the City. Government accepted the recommendations. It should however be noted that though most of these types of recommendations were frequently submitted at different times in the past and often accepted by Government, the lack of political will on the part of the leadership of the FCTA prevented their implementation. 7/14

However by the year 2003 it was clear that the situation could not be allowed to continue any further if the greens are to be preserved and maintained. Accordingly a Task team on Greening of Abuja was set up in the year 2003 and its first major assignment was to embark on the planting of one million trees along most of the major high ways of Abuja before the end of the year 2003. The success of this team later led to its transformation into a full pledge department - renamed Park and Recreation Department. The hitherto abandoned plant nursery was rehabilitated and serious attention was given to the development of the greens. It was a big turning point even though at a very high cost to the people and Government. The Authorities then turned it attention fully on the recovery of the loss green areas of Abuja City. The recovery of the green became part of the larger programme of the restoration of Abuja Master Plan. This programme though highly controversial as a result of the destructions of properties that were developed in most of these areas, (see figure 5 below) to a large extent succeeded in restoring some of the greens in Abuja. The cost implication of the destruction is a matter for another study. Fig.5 Debris In One Of The Green Areas Recovered In 2005 (Source:- Jibril, 2006) 9. THE JOURNEY SO FAR When the programme took up in 2003, the target was for the recovery of all the lost green areas of Abuja and restoring them to their original uses i.e. for recreational purposes. Therefore virtually all the shops and residential developments within these areas were cleared. (See figure 5 above). Similarly clearance of squatters that have invaded road corridors / reservations and other green open spaces were carried out. The Parks and Recreation Department after the clearance, secured all the recovered areas by way of fencing and planting of trees, shrubs and other ornamental flowers. The steps taken not only assisted in the beautification drive of the Government it also effectively prevented a repeat of the past abuses of these important areas of Abuja City. (See Figure 5). 8/14

To further give a boost to the restoration drive the Department embarked on partnership with private concerns in the development and management of some of the parks and open spaces. (See Figures: 5 & 6). Figure 5 suez park in wuse district (source jibril, 2006) Figure 6: millenium park (developed and donated for public use by a private company- the most popular public park in abuja)(source jibril, 2006) 10. THE CHALLENGES AHEAD It is over two years now since the demolition exercise stopped. There is no doubt that this exercise was a source of concern both at home and internationally too. A part from the massive destructions of properties running into millions of dollars during the recovery of these green areas in Abuja there were a lot of anguish on the side of the affected people as result of the dislocations and the attendant lost of income. In a report from an International Organization, Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE, 2008, Geneva Switzerland), that did a post demolition study in Abuja the Government was heavily criticized for the seeming lack of compassion for the affected citizens. FIGURE 7: CHILDREN S PARK & ZOO LOCATED AT THE FOOT OF ASO ROCK (SOURCE JIBRIL, 2006) FIGURE 8: A TYPICAL LOCAL STREET IN ASOKORO DISTRICT (SOURCE JIBRIL, 2006) 9/14

This criticism both at home and abroad somehow slowed down the pace and zeal of the present FCT administration on further development of the green areas. There is no doubt that a lot has been recovered but a lot has also been lost. The tempo has slowed down quite significantly in the last two years for obvious reasons. Figure 9: land use map of national arboretum - the only green area in abuja that has so far not been tempered with (source agis, 2006) Figure 10: 2006 satelite image of national arboretum - the only green area in abuja that has so far not been tempered with (source agis, 2006) There is also a new dimension to further development of these green areas. A conflict has arisen between the Department of Parks / FCT administration on one side and the Private Park operators on the other. While the later favour little or no restrictions in their activities within the parks leased to them particularly on the type of items to be sold, the FCTA on the other hand is insisting on the closure of such parks on or before 22hours daily. It is also insisting on alcohol and tobacco-free parks at all times. This tussle is now a subject of litigation between the two parties. This is also another factor that may be militating against further orderly development and management of green areas of Abuja. As earlier seen a lot has been achieved but a lot of the greens were also lost to either residential or commercial development. See Figures 11-14 T 1283 DANFODIO CRESCENT 1045 1247 861 053 1046 860 1047 859 1052 846 858 5 1051 1048 857 1064 1050 1049 856 1063 492 493 855 062954 667 854 060 668 853 058 848 849 852 056 850 1291 QUEEN AMINA STREET 1292 1054 1302 1300 1301 1299 1293 1290 297 1298 1294 1296 A04 1295 ASOKORO 1284 398 1329 901 902 900 904 905 903 1304 1251 1305 1250 1330 1249 1252 1320 1248 584 865 1306 864 585 962 1319 1321 28 5 906 4 1322 3 29 1318 UDO UDOMA 956 30 1311 9 1317 1328 7 8 1312 32 11 27 33 1327 1323 12 26 34 1326 1324 13 25 14 957 1325 40 41 24 955 15 1331 37 39 42 43 23 961 16 22 53 54 56 44 17 51 52 57 45 21 63 58 18 64 46 20 65 48 49 50 960 59 62 47 19 60 72 66 67 61 87 958 83 84 88 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 959 85 89 90 QUEEN IDIA STREET UKPABI ASIKA STREET AKENZUA STREET ADEKUNLE FAJUYI CLOSE AJAYI CROWTHER STREET ISA KAITA CLOSE 1283 DANFODIO CRESCENT 1045 1247 861 053 1046 860 1047 859 1052 846 858 5 1051 1048 857 1064 1050 1049 856 1063 492 493 855 062954 667 854 060 668 853 058 848 849 852 056 850 1291 QUEEN AMINA STREET 1292 1054 1302 1300 1301 1301 1299 1293 1290 297 1298 1294 1296 A04 1295 ASOKORO 1284 3028 1912 1913 1911 1910 1909 398 1907 2647 2646 1914 2648 2725 1329 2702 2729 2726 2701 2697 2698 1777 2727 901 2699 2711 902 2728 900 2713 904 2684 1781 2686 905 903 1304 1251 1742 1305 1250 1330 1741 2689 2681 1249 1252 1320 1809 2485 2690 2680 1248 584 865 1306 864 585 962 1319 1321 28 2691 2679 5 906 4 1322 3 29 1318 2692 2678 1904 1902 1901 UDO UDOMA 956 30 1309 1311 2693 2677 9 1317 1328 7 8 1312 2487 2694 2676 32 11 27 33 1327 1323 12 26 34 1326 1324 2696 13 25 14 957 1325 40 41 2674 24 2671 2672 955 15 1331 37 39 42 43 23 961 2673 16 22 53 54 56 44 2667 2668 17 51 52 57 45 21 63 58 18 64 46 20 65 48 49 50 960 59 62 19 1726 47 60 72 66 67 61 87 958 83 84 88 73 77 78 79 80 81 82 959 2442 1731 74 75 76 85 89 2412 90 QUEEN IDIA STREET UKPABI ASIKA STREET AKENZUA STREET ADEKUNLE FAJUYI CLOSE AJAYI CROWTHER STREET ISA KAITA CLOSE 1885 1896 0 60 120 180 240 300 m 399 ABUBAKAR KOKO STREET Figure 11:asokoro district park lost to commercial development (source: jibril, 2004) 402 966 390 396 392 393 394 395 124 391 973 125 92 120 112 126 111 93 119 113 127 110 PATRICK L WILLIAM TORBAH CLOSE 533025 0 60 120 180 240 300 m 399 1612 ABUBAKAR KOKO STREET 1762 Figure 12 :asokoro district park lost to commercial development (source: jibril, 2004) 402 966 1886 2417 390 396 1769 392 393 394 395 124 391 973 1780 125 1735 92 120 112 126 111 93 119 113 127 110 PATRICK L WILLIAM TORBAH CLOSE 3017 3018 2939 10/14

The FCTA is currently in the process of formulating a standard policy that would be a guiding principle for the maintenance of all the recovered greens in Abuja. When finally prepared it is expected to guide against future development and maintenance of greens in subsequent phases of Abuja City development. 0 60 120 180 240 300 m Figure 13:maitama sport complex lost to residential development(source jibril, 2004) 2825 2826 2827 2873 2872 2849 2828 2832 2871 2848 1999 2870 1221 2850 2846 2847 2829 2835 1993 2830 28331995 1378 41998 2851 2844 2845 2831 2834 2836 1220 860 2852 1994 3143 1222 2853 2837 3169 1219 1217 1216 1223 2859 2842 2843 1224 2838 3192 1218 1226 2854 1228 2858 2841 2840 2839 1264 1265 1266 1246 1230 2086 1996 1225 1232 1227 1234 54 2857 2000 3194 1263 1247 1229 1236 1262 1268 1231 349 2855 3196 1248 1379 1233 1237 2348 1261 1235 1238 2275 1245 2347 1276 1267 1260 1249 1244 1239 1278 2343 2856 1154 3195 1250 1243 1274 346 2342 1350 3443 1273 2345 2208 1251 1241 1252 1279 2344 2341 2366 1272 3120 2338 1997 3170 1190 1280 1286 2363 1253 1365 1240 1314 2340 2337 1281 1191 1285 1315 57 2339 2336 2276 2087 1242 1192 1271 1282 1284 2458 2335 1326 1275 1283 1195 1195 1254 1316 2459 2334 2095 2533 2088 618 1368 1331 1327 2460 2361 1372 1304 3440 1255 3444 3441 1194 1305 1290 2534 1330 1193 1193 1289 1333 1256 1288 1328 2333 3446 3445 1257 1287 1306 1291 1332 1258 3447 3437 1352 1307 1294 1293 1292 1337 2332 2096 1329 2768 1336 2097 2767 1313 1335 1339 1353 3448 2098 2763 3438 1351 2570 1678 2102 1308 1295 1038 1297 1334 2766 2764 2536 3449 1296 1340 1338 1679 60 450 2765 3176 1309 1298 1300 1341 1354 3451 2331 2492 1541 1310 1299 1301 1342 1355 3116 1302 1356 619 3499 2636 1385 2403 1311 1312 2099 1303 1343 1359 3507 3497 3016 2644 2635 2643 2632 1349 1344 2611 3491 1384 2399 3498 2634 2633 2253 1366 1348 1347 13461345 1367 1597 1624 1627 2222 640 1596 2114 1625 1626 52 2625 2594 2628 2601 2631 2103 2252 2398 2642 2242 2590 2641 2251 2624 2629 2248 2223 2626 26272645 2630 2243 2211 2250 1037 2591 2598 2241 1388 2244 1389 2249 2240 2247 2224 2245 1038 2649 2613 2614 2582 2256 2238 2239 2234 2246 2255 1387 1386 2225 2230 703 2233 2653 2235 1329 2581 2237 2236 2232 2228 1328 2652 26512650 2579 2580 2231 2226 918 2229 705 1034 1027 2499 3266 0 60 120 180 240 300 m 2498 2130 2500 2450 3121 2227 704 706 826 707 709 710 711 Figure 14:maitama sport complex lost to residential development(source jibril, 2004) 53 418 11. THE WAY FORWARD It is clear that the FCTA can not run away from the lion share of the blame for what happened in the past. In order to avoid the costly mistakes of the past, a concerted effort must be made to sensitize the private sector park operators to realize the environmental value of what their activities on this parks means to the citizenry. What they do a fail to do in these parks could have an adverse effect on the environment. Though they operate these parks as business venture and the profit motive might be strong, it should be seen as a long term investment that would definitely be profitable in the long run. The FCTA through Park & Recreation Department should continue to regulate and enforce the rules governing the operations and management of these parks with out any fear or favour. The new policy been developed in this respect is therefore a step in the right direction and it should hasten action towards the completion of the document so that operators and the general public would have a much clearer picture of what is expected of them. The FCTA should place less emphasis on negative development control activities within the City and concentrate on preventive measures. In other words areas meant for green development should never be given out to developers for any other uses other than what it is intended for in the Plan. Strict controls must also be put in place to prevent land use conversion as it affects green areas of the City. To this end closer cooperation is needed between the key Government departments, i.e. Parks & Recreation, Urban Planning, Surveys & Mapping, Abuja Environmental Protection Board (AEPB), Development Control and AGIS. Information sharing is therefore very important between these key operators and should be improve from its present level to a much higher one. 11/14

With the establishment of the Abuja Geographic Information Systems (AGIS) as the only official source of geo-spatial data in the FCT, the Parks & Recreation Department has a willing partner that could assist in the monitoring of all the existing parks within the City. With the data available in AGIS it is much easier to detect any form of landse abuse or mismanagement. It is now easy to find out when a green area is being proposed for other land uses and prevent the conversion. It is therefore strongly recommended that the Parks and Recreation Department should increase its level of cooperation with AGIS in order to avail it with all the available data that it needs in its operations. It is also recommended that the practice of offering short leases of five years to park operators should be stopped. This is because park development is capital intensive. A short lease period may not be attractive to some financial institutions that could be approached for some loans facilities. This short-lease-regime has been found to be the main reason behind park operators always wanting to convert the green area land use to commercial uses in order to make more profit at short time. Therefore a much longer lease period of between 40 60 years is recommended. That way a developer could be able to invest and recoup his investment with little or minimal stress. 12. CONCLUSION So far the greens have returned to the city landscape of Abuja even though at an extremely high cost to both the Government and the Citizens. It is regrettable that such a high cost was incurred in the process. It is clear that a little more care, a little discipline, a strong political will and above all a strong sense of responsibility in obeying planning regulations could have prevented the abuse in the first place. The fact that this development was allowed to take place over a long period of time speaks volume of our concern and respect for planning regulations. It does not make any sense for Government to spent huge tax payers money in order to get a policy document (such as A Master Plan) prepared by Consultants and then shy away from implementing the provisions of the Plan. So far the present administration has been very cautious over this sensitive matter and has tried to stay away from any controversy. While it is clear that not all the green areas could be recovered within the Phase 1 of Abuja City, the provisions of such areas within the remaining Phases of the City could be preserved and developed as per the provisions of the Master Plan. That way the FCTA can avoid the costly mistakes of the past. It is double jeopardy for government to spent tax payers money on preparing a Plan and then spends money to demolish citizens property as result of its own lapses. The pain of the past is gradually healing. It is hope that such a costly mistake would be avoided in future. LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AEPB AGIS FCC FCDA FCT Abuja Environmental Protection Board. Abuja Geographic Information System. Federal Capital City (of Abuja). Federal Capital Development Authority. Federal Capital Territory. 12/14

FCTA GIS COHRE SERAC IPA Federal Capital Territory Administration. Geographic Information System. Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions. Social and Economic Rights Action Center LAGOS. International Planning Associates. REFERENCES Ago, U.S. & Jibril, I.U. (eds.)(1999), Report of the Ministerial Committee for the Appraisal of Physical Planning and Development Issues in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, MFCT/FCDA. Ayileka, O. & Kalgo, M.S.U.(eds.) (2001), The Review of Abuja Master Plan;- Proceedings of an International Workshop for the Review of the Abuja Master Plan, held in Abuja, 29 November 2 December 1999. Ministry of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja-Nigeria. Doxiadis Associates (Nig.) Ltd. (1983), Regional Development Plan for the FCT, FCDA Abuja - Nigeria. COHRE & SERAC, (2008) The Myth of the Abuja Master Plan: Forced Evictions as Urban Planning in Abuja, Nigeria, Geneva, Switzerland www.cohre.org/nigeria. IPA, (1979). The Master Plan for Abuja, the New Federal Capital of Nigeria. FCDA, Abuja - Nigeria. Kenzo-Tange & Urtec, (1981) Central Area Urban Design of Abuja, FCDA, Abuja - Nigeria. BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES Educational qualifications: B.A.ED (Geo/Educ.) & M.Sc. (Land Resources with specialization in Land Administration) Working experience: Has put in 25 years in the Administration of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja as a Land Officer in the Department of Land Administration FCTA. Has worked (during my National Service year) as an Instructor in Map Reading with the Nigerian Army School of Artillery, Kachia Kaduna State, Nigeria, Has worked as a Geography Teacher in many Secondary Schools and a Polytechnic in Nigeria. Attended advance training programme in Gavle Sweden on Land Administration and Geographical Information, organized by Swedesurvey (the Overseas Agency for the National Land Survey of Sweden) sponsored by SIDA, has served at various times as Secretary of the, Technical Committee on Rural Lands within the FCT, Ministerial Committee for the Appraisal of Physical Planning and Development Issues within the FCT, Land Use and Allocation Committee of the FCT, Taskforce on the Computerisation of the Cadastral and Land Registry of the FCT, Currently working with the Department of Land Administration & AGIS of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja Nigeria. CONTACTS Ibrahim Usman JIBRIL Department of Land Administration, 13/14

Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA), AGIS Building, No. 4 Peace Drive, Central Area (CBD), Abuja NIGERIA Tel. +234 8(0)6541 0011 Fax + Email: ijibril@gmail.com Web site: www.abujagis.com 14/14