PG: 82B , Nottingham School House, Nottingham Road

Similar documents
Cottage City (68-096)

College Park (66-021)

Calvert Hills (66-037)

Maryland Historical Trust Inventory No. PG: 87B-026 Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties Form

Maryland Historical Trust Inventory No. PG: 71A-006 Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties Form

Historic and Cultural Resources

Glenarden (PG:72-026/PG: )

Maryland Historical Trust Inventory No. PG: 85B-007 Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties Form

Maryland Historical Trust Inventory No. PG: Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties Form

C h a p t e r 3 E V A L U A T I O N A N D D E S I G N A T I O N. Background

HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES

Maryland Historical Trust Inventory No. PG: Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties Form

Landover Metro CONCEPT PLAN 2008 Landover Metro

September 26, Ms. Elizabeth Hughes State Historic Preservation Officer Maryland Historical Trust 100 Community Place Crownsville MD

Riverview Road Fort Washington, MD. 163 Waterfront Street, Suite #450 National Harbor, MD (301)

DEPARTURE FROM DESIGN STANDARDS DDS-586

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code 3S, 3CS, 5S3 Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

APPENDIX F CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCE ASSESSMENT

Minnesota Architecture-History Inventory Form

Baby Point Heritage Conservation District Study. Kick-off Community Meeting March 27, 2017 Humbercrest United Church

CHAPTER 3 DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT CHARACTER AREA

National Museum of African American History & Culture ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT & SECTION 106 CONSULTATION

NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION FORM CONTINUATION SHEET ASSOCIATED PROPERTY TYPES

Chapter IV: Development Pattern

Note: Staff reports can be accessed at Zone: I-3. Tier:

National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior. The National Park Service in the Chesapeake Bay

6: 2417 Fourth Line, Sixteen Hollow, Lion Valley Park

Appendix 1: Site Inventory Form

Protecting Farmland. The Future of Agriculture in Prince George s County

11.1 INTRODUCTION. The characteristics of these areas are briefly discussed below.

RURAL AREA. It s Our Future

L 3-1. Heritage Report: Reasons for Heritage Designation. Wiley Bridge Gorewood Drive, Claireville Conservation Area

HISTORIC CONTEXT. Places, William Bushong, Rock Creek Park, Historic Resource Study, National Park Service, 1990.

4.3 Dudley Area Plan. Introduction. History and Existing Character. Desired Future Character for Dudley

Fredericksburg Historic Resources Survey

History of the Mayo Pennisula

Appendix D. Cultural Heritage Assessment Report

Conservation Area Designation, amendments and Review

BUILDING PLOT ADJACENT TO 21 NOTTINGHAM ROAD, BOTTESFORD LEICESTERSHIRE NG13 0AP GUIDE PRICE 120, Market Place Bingham Nottingham NG13 8AR

Supplemental Historic Resources Survey Report Industrial Zone Properties in the Southeast Los Angeles Community Plan Area

main line terminus at Camden Station to a northern line to Philadelphia at Bay View Junction. The line includes the NRHP-listed Howard Street

FIRST COCONUT GROVE SCHOOLHOUSE

MILTON HEIGHTS COMMUNITY January 2006 Revised February 2015 Revised November 2015

SUE ROSEN ASSOCIATES. Re: DA DA/485/2016. Thank you etc

VILLAGE OF BOLTON HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

INTRODUCTION. Land south of Bishopswood Lane, Tadley

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

Joint Public Hearing. Preliminary Subregion 5 Master Plan and Proposed Sectional Map Amendment

National Colonial Farm in Piscataway Park: Green History, Farming, and the Quest for Relevance

Historical Affairs and Landmark Review Board Arlington County, Virginia

WANSFORD. Village Design Statement. Supplementary Planning Guidance adopted by Peterborough City Council on 22 nd August 2003

CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES POLICIES

Friends Meeting House, Broughton. Meeting House Lane, Little Broughton, Cockermouth, CA13 0YQ. National Grid Reference: NY

Town of Washington, New Hampshire Master Plan 2015

Mayfield West Phase 2 Secondary Plan

Glenbrooke North. New Westminster s Neighbourhoods Identifying Historical Contexts. Historical Neighbourhood Context Statements 2008

Original License Report. Submitted to: New Horizon Development Inc. 69 John Street South, Suite 304 Hamilton, Ontario L8N 2B9 Phone (905)

HERITAGE CONSERVATION STRATEGY REPORT VISION GEORGETOWN SECONDARY PLAN PHASE 3 TOWN OF HALTON HILLS REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF HALTON, ONTARIO

Page 1 of 19 URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK FOR BOLTON STREET WATERFORD

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division

Bridgedale, Bridgetown Request for Expressions of Interest to Lease and/ or Develop

City of Burlington Official Plan Review: Indian Point Character Area Study. April 2, 2013 Public Visioning Workshop

ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 404 MASTER PLANNING

Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment Review Update of the Mayfield West Phase II Secondary Plan TOWN OF CALEDON, ONTARIO.

57: 2031 North Service Road West, Hilton Farm

Interpretive Planning Toolkit for Trails National Trails Conference May 2011

Fort Wellington National Historic Site

New England Archaeology

PHASE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ERF 3 ROBERTSON WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE

SECTION I BACKGROUND

Planning Board Action Limit: 2/1/06 Plan Acreage: Location: R-R Southwest of Ritchie Marlboro Road, Dwelling Units: Zone:

Kenilworth Avenue and Town of Cheverly Industrial Study Briefing

HISTORIC SITE FORM -- HISTORIC SITE INVENTORY PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (06-09) 1 IDENTIFICATION

Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Conservation Plan

History of American Landscapes and Architecture

Houses on the Forest Edge

INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF THE DESIGN GUIDELINES HISTORY OF CALVERT COUNTY

Derry City and Strabane District Council Planning Committee Report

Presentation of the Staff Draft. July 17, 2014 SSRVP Team, Area 3

INTRODUCTION PLANNING HISTORY

CHAPTER 2: HISTORIC BACKGROUND

Section. Corridor Context & History

Foreword. Sincerely, Elizabeth M. Hewlett. Approved Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment for the Tuxedo Road/Arbor Street/Cheverly Metro Area

Case Studies; Meitheal Clusters Applied to Villages and Rural Settlements

Karen Wiggen, RLA PGM/Planning Bob Harrington, P.E. PGM/CPIS Michael Clar, P.E. - ECOSITE

Examination of South Cambridgeshire Local Plan

Municipal Inventory of Cultural Heritage Properties - St. Joseph Inventory of Designated and Potential Heritage Properties

Rural Historic Structural Survey of New Lenox Township Will County, Illinois

Authorization to Study Potential Heritage Conservation Districts (HCD) under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act

Appraisal of proposed alterations to the boundary of Helmsley Conservation Area

Preservation Study for Bristoe Station and Kettle Run Battlefields Prince William County, Virginia

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George s County Planning Department Development Review Division

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Preparation of National Register of Historic Places. Nominations for the following:

APPENDIX 9 HERITAGE CHARACTER

Bureau for Historic Preservation s Guidance for Historic Preservation Planning

Tazewell Pike. Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District Design Guidelines

master plan of highways

Using the Past to Understand the Present Emerging Lessons for Environmental Planning in the Santa Clara Valley

24. ARCHAEOLOGY & BUILT HERITAGE

HISTORIC SITE FORM - HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (10-08) 1 IDENTIFICATION

Transcription:

Nottingham (82B-035) Located in southeastern Prince George s County, the community of Nottingham was established when the General Assembly of the Province of Maryland passed the Act for the Advancement of Trade and Erecting Ports and Towns in 1706 and 1707 in order to establish commercial centers along the rivers in Maryland. In 1747, Nottingham was designated as an inspection site for tobacco. In order to protect the quality of tobacco being shipped to England, all tobacco grown in Maryland had to pass through inspections sites at Nottingham, Piscataway, Upper Marlboro, or Bladensburg before it was allowed to be publicly sold. 1 Between 1791 and 1801, Nottingham exported more than 8,340 hogsheads of tobacco. 2 These small landing communities grew as commercial activity was drawn to tobacco warehouses located on the banks of rivers and nearby creeks. Beginning in the late eighteenth century, Baltimore began to develop as a large port, with more farmers using Baltimore for the inspection, sale, and shipping of their tobacco. As Baltimore grew, the smaller river communities began to diminish as centers of commercial activity. 3 The Patuxent River became more shallow, which limited the size of ships that could navigate the waters. By the late nineteenth century, Nottingham began to decline and the population steadily decreased as families relocated to other areas. A devastating fire in 1901 destroyed most of the buildings in the small community, leaving only a few extant structures. 4 The 1861 Martenet map shows a small town situated on the banks of the Patuxent River. Within the town there were several non-residential buildings, including the Stamp & Son Store and Post Office, a blacksmith shop, and a hotel run by William Quinn. 5 The 1878 Hopkins map shows some changes in Nottingham. The map indicates the addition of a schoolhouse located in the northern part of the town, as well as several warehouses on the river banks. 6 There are two Historic Sites in Nottingham: PG: 82B-035-17, Turton-Smith House, 17414 Nottingham Road PG: 82B-035-20, E. Plater House, 17415 Watershed Drive There is one Historic Resource in Nottingham: PG: 82B-035-16, Nottingham School House, 17410 Nottingham Road 1 Marina King, The Tobacco Industry in Prince George s County, 1680-1940, in Historic Contexts in Prince George s County: Short Papers on Settlement Patterns, Transportation and Cultural History (Upper Marlboro, MD: Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, 1991), 69-71. 2 John Sherwood, On the Banks of the Patuxent, Maryland Journal, 16 October 1986. 3 King, The Tobacco Industry in Prince George s County, 69-71. 4 Susan G. Pearl, Early Towns in Prince George s County, 1683-1787, in Historic Contexts in Prince George s County: Short Papers on Settlement Patterns, Transportation and Cultural History (Upper Marlboro, MD: Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, 1991), 1-6. 5 Simon J. Martenet, Atlas of Prince George s County, Maryland, 1861, Adapted from Martenet s Map of Prince George s County, Maryland (Baltimore: Simon J. Martenet C.E., 1861). 6 G.M. Hopkins, Atlas of Fifteen Miles Around Washington, Including the County of Prince George Maryland (Philadelphia: G.M. Hopkins, C.E., 1878).

Nottingham (82B-035) 2 Windshield Survey A windshield survey of Nottingham was conducted in July 2007. Virtually nothing remains of the oncebustling eighteenth-century port town. The survey district comprises approximately eleven primary structures and several secondary buildings. The majority of buildings are late-twentieth-century infill, some constructed as recently as 2002. There is only one remaining nineteenth-century building (the Turton-Smith House), although several other residences were constructed immediately after the fire in 1901. The Colonial Revival is the predominate style in Nottingham, whether a vernacular or modern interpretation. Most buildings sit close to the road and are oriented to face the Patuxent River. The topography of Nottingham is gently sloping towards the river. The Patuxent River continues to erode the banks of Nottingham. One Historic Resource, Stamp s Store & Post Office Site (PG: 82B-035-18), located at 17416 Nottingham Road, was demolished in 2002. A new single dwelling house was constructed on the site. Historic District Evaluation In 1975, the Nottingham Site was listed in the National Register of Historic Places as an archaeological site. The site is noted for its collection of materials from the Middle Archaic (ca. 6000 B.C.) through the Late Woodland (A.D. 1600) periods. Also significant is the Middle Woodland Selby Bay and Late Woodland component that may correspond to the village of Mattpament, which was shown on John Smith s 1608 map. Nottingham represents several of Prince George s County Heritage Themes including: Early Towns, Landings and River Crossings, War of 1812, and Education. Despite these themes, Nottingham is not eligible as a historic district. Nottingham s historic significance is as an eighteenth-century port town. However, there are no eighteenth-century buildings remaining in Nottingham to reflect this period of significance. As the Patuxent became unnavigable and new transportation routes bypassed the village, Nottingham no longer functioned as a port town, but as a small rural village. There is only one extant building from the nineteenth century, and it alone does not convey the significance of an eighteenthcentury rural village. Several buildings from the early twentieth century remain, and the most significant of these has been individually recognized as a local historic site. In addition, the few early-twentiethcentury buildings have been compromised by the late-twentieth and early-twenty-first-century structures. Any archaeological potential for information has been compromised by the erosion caused by the Patuxent River. In addition, the community fails to retain its integrity of location, design, materials, workmanship, setting, association, and feeling. Because of these issues, Nottingham is not eligible for listing as a local historic district, or as a National Register Historic District. Individual Designation The Nottingham School, a one-room schoolhouse constructed circa 1911, is currently listed as a Prince George s County Historic Resource (PG: 82B-035-16). This building should be considered for evaluation as a Prince George s County Historic Site. It is representative of one of the few remaining one-room schoolhouses in the county, dating from the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Prepared by EHT Traceries, Inc. November 2007

Nottingham (82B-035) 3 Nottingham, 2005 Aerial = 2007 survey area

Nottingham (82B-035) 4 Nottingham, Martenet, 1861 = 2007 survey area

Nottingham (82B-035) 5 Nottingham, Hopkins, 1878 = 2007 survey area

Nottingham (82B-035) 6 Nottingham, 1938 Aerial = 2007 survey area

Nottingham (82B-035) 7 North elevation, 17309 Tanyard Road (EHT Traceries, 2007)

Nottingham (82B-035) 8 Looking southeast, E. Plater House (PG: 82B-035-20), 17415 Watershed Drive (EHT Traceries, 2007)

Nottingham (82B-035) 9 Looking northeast, 17500 Watershed Drive (EHT Traceries, 2007)

Nottingham (82B-035) 10 Looking south, 17416 Nottingham Road (EHT Traceries, 2007)

Nottingham (82B-035) 11 Looking northeast, Nottingham School House (PG: 82B-035-16), 17410 Nottingham Road (EHT Traceries, 2007)

Nottingham (82B-035) 12 Looking northeast at Patuxent River (EHT Traceries, 2007)

Nottingham (82B-035) 13 Looking southeast, Turton-Smith House (PG: 82B-035-17), 17414 Nottingham Road (EHT Traceries, 2007)