CITY OF SACRAMENTO GENERAL PLAN. UC Davis ESP 171 Urban and Regional Planning April 21, 2011

Similar documents
2040 LUP is a part of the Comprehensive Plan and carries the same legal authority. Economic Challenges

Blueprint Denver A BLUEPRINT FOR AN INCLUSIVE CITY. Executive Summary

Remi Mendoza City Planning Academy March 13, 2017

Visioning Statement and Guiding Principles

Plano Tomorrow Vision and Policies

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

S A C R A M E N T O C O U N T Y JACKSON HIGHWAY & GRANT LINE EAST VISIONING STUDY

Urban Design Manual PLANNING AROUND RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS (PARTS) Introduction. Station Study Areas

Trends and Best Practices in Comprehensive Plans. Ben Herman Clarion Associates

Concord Community Reuse Project Goals and Guiding Principles. Overarching Goals (OG)

Broken Arrow Comprehensive Plan Update Public Workshop Meeting #3 January 23,

Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG)

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

What s in a Name Sustainability, Smart Growth, New Urbanism

ELK GROVE GENERAL PLAN VISION

Living in Albemarle County s Urban Places

Silverdale Regional Center

CHAPTER 2: PLANNING PRINCIPLES

A BLUEPRINT FOR BROCKTON A CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Prepared for the Citizens of Forsyth County by the City-County Planning Board

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

Introduction and Overview

South Central Connecticut Region Plan of Conservation & Development 2018 Update. Municipal Planners

4 Sustainability and Growth Management

City of Long Beach. creating vibrant and exciting places

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

4- PA - LD - LIVELY DOWNTOWN. LD - Background

WAC #7 3/14/14. Coachella General Plan Update

PSRC REVIEW REPORT & CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION

Cumberland Region Tomorrow is a private, non-profit, citizen based regional organization working with Greater Nashville Regional Council

Ridgefield and the Growth Management Act

Create Policy Options Draft Plan Plan Approval. Public Consultation Events. Phase 2

Natomas Vision Plan and PLNP

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PINELLAS COUNTY MPO LIVABLE COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

Appendix 1 Structure plan guidelines

OKEFORD FITZPAINE NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN

Applicant Name Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code . Property Owner Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code

DRAFT PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT GC81

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW. Game Plan for a Healthy City

Planning Charlotte s Future. Planning Committee June 21, 2016

DALY CITY VISIONING PROCESS COMMUNITY WORKSHOP 3 MAY 8, 2008

Port Lavaca Future Land Use

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

Rezoning Issues Setting a Foundation for Zoning Decisions

The Five Components of the McLoughlin Area Plan

Citizen Advisory Group Meeting 5: Land Use April 14, 2011

Official Plan Review

V. Vision and Guiding Principles

Preliminary Plan Framework: Vision and Goals

Land Use Policy & Development Ordinance Update

Chapter IV: Development Pattern

Public Open House #1

1 Introduction. 4 Environmental Integrity. 7 Community Facilities

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

Joint Study Session of the Sutter County. March 2, 2009

New Official Plan Quest November 2013

Preliminary Recommendations Tk Takoma/Langley Crossroads Sector Plan

TOD 101 CREATING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES WITH TRANSIT

WELCOME and introduction

Welcome to the Oakridge Centre Open House

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Elfrida Growth Area Study

Blueprint Denver Task Force Meeting #

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

International Blvd. TOD Plan Public Workshop #1

City of St. Thomas New Official Plan

EXPO LINE COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS NOVEMBER 27 TH & DECEMBER 3 RD Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Smart Growth Development Checklist

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

Community Design Guidelines. Port Wallace DRAFT

Planning Charlotte s Future. Transportation & Planning Committee March 14, 2016

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

KEY FINDINGS. Community Engagement + Research

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

Executive Summary. The Mebane CLP is not a regulatory document, but is intended to guide land development decisions. The plan includes:

Employment and Commercial Review Analysis of Policy Directions

Midtown Greenway Land Use and Development Plan Executive Summary

Municipal Development Plan 2013

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION

2030 Comprehensive Plan VISION STATEMENT

GUIDING PRINCIPLES IN THIS CHAPTER

K. SMART ASSOCIATES LIMITED

Chapter 1. Community Context. Vision Statement Population and Housing Trends Legislative Context Regional Context Statement

Elliot Park 2. Neighborhood Master Plan. Historical Perspective

WEST OAKLAND SPECIFIC PLAN & DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

A community driven catalyst for an equitable, healthy, (economically viable and environmentally) sustainable corridor

Chapter 1 Vision Statement & Goals

CHAPTER 3 VISION, GOALS, & PLANNING PRINCIPLES. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Vision Statement. Growth Management Goals.

Contact: Alex Taranu ( ) or Karl Walsh ( )

NEW REGIONAL OFFICIAL PLAN HIGH LEVEL PROCESS & FRAMEWORK

1 Introduction. Chapter. In this chapter:

Functional Areas of Practice AICP EXAM REVIEW. February 20, 2009 Georgia Tech Student Center

Sustaining Places & The Scales of Planning

FINAL WEST OAKLAND SPECIFIC PLAN & FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

East Central Area Plan

Status Report: MD 355 Project

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Transcription:

CITY OF SACRAMENTO GENERAL PLAN UC Davis ESP 171 Urban and Regional Planning April 21, 2011 1

OUTLINE Background Growth and Change Placemaking Sustainability and Climate Change Economic Development 2

City of Sacramento General Plan BACKGROUND 3

SACRAMENTO LOCATION Graphic from Wikipedia, authored by Arkyan. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/file:sacramento_county_california_incorpo rated_and_unincorporated_areas_sacramento_highlighted.svg This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. 4

Capitol City 5

Sacramento s Historic Framework - 1902 6

Sacramento s Neighborhoods 7

Population Growth Year City County Difference % City 1900 29,000 45,000 16,000 64% 1940 106,000 170,000 64,000 62% 1950 137,000 277,000 140,000 49% 1960 191,000 503,000 312,000 38% 1970 257,000 632,000 375,000 41% 1980 275,000 783,000 508,000 35% 1990 369,000 1,041,000 672,000 35% 2000 407,000 1,223,000 816,000 33% 2010 466,000 1,420,000 954,000 33% Source: City of Sacramento, SACOG. 8

WHAT S A GENERAL PLAN? Comprehensive & long-term (2005 2030) Required by state law Must address land use, circulation, housing, conservation, open space, noise, and safety May address other topics (economic development, community design, historic preservation, sustainability, energy, air quality) Must be internally consistent Must be implemented through zoning, subdivision approvals, public infrastructure projects, etc. 9

ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN Required Land Use Circulation Housing Noise Open Space Conservation Safety Optional Economic Development Urban Design Historic Preservation Public Health 10

IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS General Plan Community Plans Specific Plans Zoning Subdivision Maps Conditional Use Permits Variances Building Permits Grading Permits How to Make General Plan Policies a Reality?

HOW THE GENERAL PLAN AFFECTS DEVELOPMENT Development must be consistent with General Plan policies Changes to General plan policies and land use diagram require Commission and Council approval General Plan and zoning code must be internally consistent Lays the framework for other detailed studies, policies and regulations 12

WHY UPDATE THE PLAN? Continued Regional Growth Development Since Previous Plan (1988) SACOG s Regional Blueprint Emergent Best Practices & Adopted Initiatives Smart Growth, Livable Communities, Sustainability, Economic Development New Generation of Community Needs & Visions 13

POLICY FOUNDATION Sustainability 2030 General Plan Climate Change SACOG Blueprint (2004) Infill Strategy (2002) Transit for Livable Communities (2002) Economic Development Strategy (2000) Sacramento Smart Growth Principles (2001) Adopted/Draft Master Plans Existing General Plan (1988) and existing Community Plans 14

GENERAL PLAN PROCESS Fall 2005 Fall 2005 Spring 2007 Spring 2007 Fall 2007 Summer 2007 Summer 2008 Fall 2008 Winter 2009 DATA ISSUES VISION ALTER- NATIVES POLICIES & PLAN EIR PUBLIC HEARINGS & ADOPTION 15

PUBLIC OUTREACH & INVOLVEMENT 16

PUBLIC OUTREACH & INVOLVEMENT COMMUNITY CONVENTION: CELEBRATING THE GENERAL PLAN 17

PUBLIC OUTREACH & INVOLVEMENT COMMUNITY CONVENTION: CELEBRATING THE GENERAL PLAN? 18

City of Sacramento General Plan GROWTH & CHANGE 19

SACOG BLUEPRINT PROCESS Sacramento Area Council of Governments Extensive public outreach effort Adopted by SACOG in 2004 Endorsed by most of SACOG s cities and counties 20

REGIONAL GROWTH TRENDS 21

SACOG BLUEPRINT Growth Principles Transportation Choices Mixed Use Developments Compact Development Housing Choice and Diversity Use of Existing Assets Quality Design Natural Resources Conservation 22

KEY ISSUES Where Do You Put? 200,000 more people 140,000 more jobs 100,000 housing units How Do You Grow? Expand Out Build Inward What Should that Growth Look Like? Community Design Neighborhood Character

GENERAL PLAN ALTERNATIVES Three Alternatives Significant Trade-offs Focus on neighborhoods, centers and corridors Areas of change Land Uses Identifies Distribution, Densities & Intensities Urban Form Focus on Design, Form & Character

ALTERNATIVE 1: 1988 GENERAL PLAN

ALTERNATIVE 2: COMPACT / REINVESTMENT

ALTERNATIVE 3: MULTI-CENTERED, NEW GROWTH

LAND USE & URBAN FORM: GROWTH DIAGRAM Open Space: agriculture, habitat protection, or regional recreation. Preserve and Enhance: retain current form and character, with minor infill and reuse. Improve and Evolve: significant change through infill, reuse, and redevelopment. Transformation Urban: major development and redevelopment projects. Transformation - New Growth: major new greenfield development areas. 28

City of Sacramento General Plan PLACEMAKING 29

LAND USE & URBAN FORM SCHEME Character Types Rural Suburban Traditional Urban Place Types Neighborhoods Centers Corridors Employment Open Space 30

LAND USE & URBAN FORM POLICIES Neighborhoods Centers Corridors Employment Open Space, Recreation, & Parks Public/Quasi-Public & Special Uses 31

LAND USE & URBAN FORM POLICIES Special Study Areas Not planned for growth Possible annexation areas Require GPA, Community Plan, & applicable master plans & financing plans Must provide community benefits Planned Development Must be developed consistent with Vision & GP policies No new PD areas after adoption of GP 32

LAND USE & URBAN FORM POLICIES 33

COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS 34

COMMERCIAL STREETS Parking located to the side or behind buildings Limited number of curb cuts, shared access Attractive pedestrian streets: landscaping, lighting, amenities 35

RESIDENTIAL STREETS 36

SITE PLANNING 37

BUILDING HEIGHT, ORIENTATION TO STREET Building façades and entrances directly on the street Pedestrian-oriented uses such as outdoor cafes at street level Horizontal and vertical residential mixed use 38

City of Sacramento General Plan SUSTAINABILITY & CLIMATE CHANGE 39

CEQA & CLIMATE CHANGE Adoption of a General Plan is a Discretionary Act Impacts to Environment Must Be Mitigated to Maximum Extent Attorney General Lawsuit and Guidance 40

MAJOR GHG EMISSIONS SECTORS Transportation Building Energy Waste-In-Place Water Use 41

HOW PLANNING ADDRESSES CLIMATE CHANGE Priority for Infill & Density Complete Streets and Neighborhoods Healthy Communities Green Building and Design Economic Development Moving People, not Cars Urban Forest Energy Efficiency Water and Open Space Conservation 42

City of Sacramento General Plan ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 43

BARRIERS TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Inadequate land supply Zoning restrictions Uncertainty of permit process/political support Toxic contamination Environmental mitigations High costs of development 44

ADEQUATE SITES FOR JOBS 45

HOW PLANNING AFFECTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Land supply for employment-generating uses Adequate public facilities Costs of development: design standards permit fees Policies to subsidize development Availability of affordable housing Policies to favor local workers 46

SHOVEL READY FACTORS Key development areas Access to transit Existing infrastructure Developer Interest Market acceptance Community Support 47

THANK YOU Thomas Pace, Long Range Planning Manager, City of Sacramento Community Development Department (916) 808-6848 tpace@cityofsacramento.org General Plan: www.sacgp.org 48