TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C.

Similar documents
BRISBANE BAYLANDS INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FEBRUARY 2011 APPENDIX O DRAFT


PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT

STAFFORD TRACT NORTH OF US90A 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 OBJECTIVE

Pollutant Removal Benefits

PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT

DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS

STORMWATER REPORT FOR WALMART SUPERCENTER STORE # SIOUX FALLS, LINCOLN COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA BFA PROJECT NO

ARIZONA WATER COMPANY

CHECKLIST FOR PHASE II DRAINAGE REPORT

PCE PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR WESTWOOD MIXED USE NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT 772 NORTH FOREST ROAD TOWN OF AMHERST, ERIE COUNTY, NEW YORK

Bioretention cell schematic key

26 Attachment 2. Township of New Britain APPENDIX B STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN CRITERIA

APPENDIX B. Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis

October 7, City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303) RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report

Evaluating Low Impact Development Practices for Stormwater Management on an Industrial Site in Mississippi

July 19, City of Watertown Attn: Justin Wood, City Engineer Room 305, City Hall 245 Washington Street Watertown, NY 13601

Draft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT STUDY. Johnson County Park and Recreation District Verhaeghe Park

Table of Contents G.1.a Water Resources - Surface Water - Drainage

Three Rivers Park District Administration Center Rain Garden

MANUAL OF DESIGN, INSTALLATION, AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS

City of Richmond. Engineering Design Specifications

Outfall Flow Analysis for the Oswego Canal and Blue Heron Canal

Appendix K. Stormwater Management Plan

Modeling Cumulative LID Features for Floodplain Impacts in an Urban Watershed in Houston, TX

Land Development Characteristics (Module 6)

City of Waco Stormwater Management Regulations

NAPA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Standards & Specifications

Going Green with the NYS Stormwater Design Standards

Session 1E Non-Structural BMPs. Chesapeake Bay Stormwater Training Partnership 1

Washington County, Maryland Division of Public Works Policy Manual

2I-5 Bioswales (Numbering pending)

Chapter 1 GENERAL SOUTH DAKOTA DRAINAGE MANUAL

User s Guide for the BMP Sizing Tool. Revised December 2017

Managing Stormwater within the Road Right-of-Way: An Urban NAI Approach

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT LATHAM 200 MMSCFD GAS PROCESSING PLANT

West Virginia Stormwater Management Manual: Methods.

Old Mill Community Association Bioretention Facility

Lincoln 270. City of Lincoln. Stormwater Management Plan. April 2, 2013

ENVISIONING THE POSSIBILITIES OF A DIGITAL CITY: A CASE STUDY OF RAIN GARDENS AS FLOOD CONTROL IN AUSTIN, TEXAS CE 394K FALL 2011 PROF.

Project Name: Project Address or Location: Principal Designer Name and Company: Principal Designer Phone Number:

Stormwater Retrofitting: The Art of Opportunity. Presented by the Center for Watershed Protection

Figure 1 Cypress Street Study Area Location Map

Appendix I. Checklists

DFH JOINT VENTURE. Stormwater Management Report for Proposed Residential Subdivision at Graham Block, Pokeno

City of Elmhurst. City of Elmhurst. Storm Sewer System Workshop November 22, 2010

PHASE III DRAINAGE REPORT

ANSWER KEY MGSFlood v WWHM2012 (released 5/15/2015)

North Branch of Cypress Creek Ecological Restoration: A Comprehensive Approach to Stream Restoration

WQ-23 MOUNTAINOUS AND STEEP SLOPE SITES

PLAN SUBMITTER'S CHECKLIST

Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Oneonta Heights Oneonta, NY TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE

Chapter 4 - Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans

ARTICLE III COMBINED SEWERS

5. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS

Attachment 2: Permeable Pavement Design Guidelines

MEMORANDUM. September 10, 2018

When planning stormwater management facilities, the following principles shall be applied where possible.

Town of Windsor. Stormwater Manual

CHAPTER 9 STORM DRAINAGE. Minimum Requirements for New Development and Redevelopment

Predicting Design Storm Runoff for the Six Mile Creek Watershed: Effects of the Potential Sprawl-Is-Us, Inc. Development

Assessing Directly Connected Impervious Areas in Residential Subdivisions in Western Sydney, NSW

4. CONCEPT PLAN DEVELOPMENT

Village of New Maryland. Storm Water Management Master Plan

Portland and Progressive Stormwater Design

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION...

Erosion & Sediment Control Plan Application Form & Checklist

General Technical Guidance for Treatment Measures

Development and Design of Cost-Effective, Real-Time Implementable Sediment and Contaminant Release Controls

APPENDIX APPENDIX 6 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT

GREATER NEW HAVEN WPCA. GREEN REDEVELOPMENT REDUCES CSOs IN NEW HAVEN. Tom Sgroi, P.E. Director of Engineering, GNHWPCA

Evaluating Urban Stormwater Retrofits in the SE US Coastal Plain

Article 20 Stormwater Management

GIS Training of Undergraduates: Campus Stormwater Mapping. Joanne Logan, University of Tennessee. Gordie Bennett, University of Tennessee

MASTER DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE PLAN FOR MONUMENT HEIGHTS

Hydrologic Assessment of using Low Impact Development to Mitigate the Impacts of Climate Change. Chris Jensen, AScT Master of Science Thesis

GIS-Enabled Rain Garden Design: A Case Study in Austin, Texas. GIS in Water Resources (C E 394K-3) Clint Smith, E.I.T.

Blake C. Kronkosky, PE, Ph.D.

City of Columbia BMP Manual. Volume Calculation Tool and Examples


4. Contractor (and subcontractors if applicable) certification statement(s)

General Technical Guidance for Treatment Measures

Keele Campus Storm Drainage. Presented by Mark Hagesteijn September 24, 2013

Drainage Analysis-Newgate/Phelps & Hatchett Hill Road Areas Rev. 0 Erosion & Sediment Control Measures

City of Elmhurst. Comprehensive Flood Plan. City of Elmhurst. City Council Meeting September 15, 2014

Albert R. Jarrett. Annual and Individual-Storm Green Roof Stormwater Response Models

CITY OF FORT LUPTON STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA SECTION 10 STREETS

South Bismarck Watershed Model Update and Stormwater Improvement Project

County Council Of Howard County, Maryland

City of Troutdale South Troutdale Road Storm Drainage Plan

Gloucester County PLAN SUBMITTER'S CHECKLIST

C. WATER. 1. Surface Water Runoff. See Section C.3, Flood Hazard/Mudflow Hazard, page Ground Water

Post Construction BMPs

URWH at various scales

1. Project Description

Green Infrastructure Modeling in Cincinnati Ohio. Small Scale Green Infrastructure Design Using Computer Modeling

A. Regional Detention Requirements

Village of Forest Park. July 27, Sewer Separation Evaluation

Preliminary Sediment & Stormwater Management Plan Review Checklist DATE RECEIVED: PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME:

Transcription:

TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C. HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS FOR ACCESS ROADS ALONG THE CONNECTICUT PIPELINE EXPANSION PROJECT CONNECTICUT LOOP Submitted by: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. Louisiana St, Suite Houston, TX 77 APRIL

The attached hydrologic and hydraulic calculations were performed for all field surveyed waterbodies crossed by the Connecticut Pipeline Extension (Project) Hartford County Connecticut. The Project would consist of installing approximately. miles of pipeline looping:. Miles of 6-inch Pipeline Loop in Albany County, New York ( NY Loop ).8 Miles of 6-inch Pipeline Loop in Berkshire County, Massachusetts ( MA Loop ). 8. Miles of -inch Pipeline Loop in Hampden County, Massachusetts and Hartford County, Connecticut ( CT Loop). The primary objective of the attached calculations was to evaluate the amount of runoff due to the construction of permanent access roadways to the pipeline, and to size flume pipes at each waterbody crossing to convey, at a minimum, normal flow safely under the access roads. A typical flume installation will consist of sand bag cofferdams placed at the upstream and downstream limits of the construction workspace and the installation of the pipe specified in the design.

DESIGN CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGY The following design criteria and methodology was used to perform the calculations:. Hydrologic Methodology Hydrologic calculations were performed using a combination of the Rational Method, the NRCS (SCS) Peak Flow Method, USGS StreamStats, and USGS StreamStats with HydroCAD v... The specific method used to calculate the design flows for each waterbody varied based on parameters such as the watershed size, waterbody slope, basin elevation, and ground cover type (e.g. pasture, forest, urban). a. Rational Method: Q=CIA Q = flow (cubic feet per second - cfs) C = runoff coefficient A = drainage area (acres ac) I = rainfall intensity (inches per hour in/hr) This method was used for drainage areas up to acres in size NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS Hydro- was used to determine I in Connecticut County of Hartford. The following Runoff Coefficients were used: Cover Type Slope Range (%) Hydrologic Soil Group* Runoff Coefficient Pasture % - 6% D. Forest % % D. Forest > % D.8 Gravel %-% N/A.8 *Hydrologic Soil Group D was used for a conservative approach. Time of Concentrations were calculated using the following: o Sheet Flow: Manning s Kinematic Solution Maximum (max) sheet flow length of ft

o Shallow Concentrated Flow The travel time for shallow concentrated flow was calculated by dividing the travel path length by a calculated velocity. The velocity for specific cover types were calculated using Manning s equation. o Channel Flow As upstream channel morphology is not constant, the travel time for Channel flow was calculated by assuming a channel velocity of. ft/s and applying it to the shallow concentrated flow formula. b. NRCS (SCS) Peak Flow Method: The computer program HydroCAD, Version., was used to determine the peak flow discharges for the watershed. HydroCAD is a program which employs TR- methodology which uses the unit-hydrograph runoff procedure. As with TR-, the HydroCAD peak flow discharges are dependent upon parameters such as watershed size, the curve number for a given watershed, time of concentration, available flood storage, rainfall storm type, rainfall intensity and storm duration. The following curve numbers were used: Cover Type Hydrologic Soil Group* Curve Number (CN) Woods D 8 Pasture D 89 Urban D 98 *Hydrologic Soil Group D was used for poor soil conditions, and a conservative approach. Depths were used in conjunction with a -hour storm duration. The Time of Concentration was calculated using the same methodology used for the Rational Method. c. USGS StreamStats for Connecticut StreamStats is a Web-based tool developed by the USGS and Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI). This map-based Web application was designed to make it easy for users to obtain stream flow statistics, drainage-basin characteristics, and other information for userselected sites. StreamStats utilizes previously published information from gaging stations and previously gathered basin characteristics to develop stream flow statistics utilizing the

appropriate regression equations to compute the stream flows. The StreamStats flows will only be utilized where the drainage area falls within the acceptable ranges for Mean/Base-Flow or for Peak Flow. Drainage areas outside the acceptable ranges generate flows that are based on extrapolations with unknown errors. d. Design Frequency: The design frequency utilized in the design varied based on the U.S. Weather Bureau Technical Paper. A -year design, a -year, and a -year maximum design storm were utilized for all watershed classifications. Average daily flow calculations were also performed for larger watersheds where the - and -year storms resulted in flows that cannot be completely passed within the designed pipes and it is unlikely that a -year or -year storm event will occur during the crossing.. Hydraulic Calculations The temporary flume pipes were sized using the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) HY-8 computer program. HY-8 is a culvert analysis program that automates the design methods described in HDS No., Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts.. Summary and Results The post construction hydrology of the access road areas are not significantly altered by the construction of the access roadways. The flows, summarized in the table below, are not significantly higher due to the construction of the access roadways and will not negatively impact the surrounding areas. See attached table on the next page, for flume pipe and stream crossing details. Pre-Development Flow CT PAR- Post-Development Flow Difference Difference (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) ( % ) -Year.9.79. 7. -Year 7.89 8.8.9 7. -Year.76.78. 7.

X 6 7 6 PP X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X AREA: CT PAR- // // // AREA: CT PAR-A // // // // // // // // //

S S S S CT PAR-a PRE CT PAR- PRE CT PAR- Post CT PAR-a POST R 6R PRE POST Subcat Reach Pond Link Routing Diagram for C-ENG-C78CT-PAR, Printed 7// HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC

C-ENG-C78CT-PAR CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=. in/hr Printed 7// HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Time span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs, points Runoff by Rational method, Rise/Fall=./. xtc Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment S: CT PAR- PRE Subcatchment S: CT PAR- Post Subcatchment S: CT PAR-a PRE Subcatchment S: CT PAR-a POST Reach R: PRE Reach 6R: POST Runoff Area=9.8 ac.8% Impervious Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=,7' Tc=9.6 min C=. Runoff=.67 cfs.6 af Runoff Area=9.8 ac.8% Impervious Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=,7' Tc=9.6 min C=. Runoff=.96 cfs.8 af Runoff Area=. ac.% Impervious Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=9' Tc=. min C=. Runoff=.7 cfs. af Runoff Area=. ac.% Impervious Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=9' Tc=. min C=.8 Runoff=.8 cfs.7 af Inflow=.9 cfs. af Outflow=.9 cfs. af Inflow=.79 cfs.7 af Outflow=.79 cfs.7 af Total Runoff Area =.788 ac Runoff Volume =.6 af Average Runoff Depth =." 99.6% Pervious =.66 ac.7% Impervious =.6 ac

C-ENG-C78CT-PAR CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=. in/hr Printed 7// HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Subcatchment S: CT PAR- PRE.67 cfs Runoff CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=. in/hr Runoff Area=9.8 ac Runoff Volume=.6 af Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=,7' Tc=9.6 min C=.

C-ENG-C78CT-PAR CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=. in/hr Printed 7// HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Subcatchment S: CT PAR- Post.96 cfs CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=. in/hr Runoff Area=9.8 ac Runoff Volume=.8 af Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=,7' Tc=9.6 min C=. Runoff

C-ENG-C78CT-PAR CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=. in/hr Printed 7// HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Subcatchment S: CT PAR-a PRE.8.7.7 cfs Runoff.7.6.6.......... CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=. in/hr Runoff Area=. ac Runoff Volume=. af Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=9' Tc=. min C=..

C-ENG-C78CT-PAR CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=. in/hr Printed 7// HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Subcatchment S: CT PAR-a POST.9.8.8.7.7.6.6..........8 cfs CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=. in/hr Runoff Area=. ac Runoff Volume=.7 af Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=9' Tc=. min C=.8 Runoff..

C-ENG-C78CT-PAR CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=. in/hr Printed 7// HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Reach R: PRE 6.9 cfs Inflow Area=.89 ac Inflow Outflow

C-ENG-C78CT-PAR CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=. in/hr Printed 7// HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Reach 6R: POST 6.79 cfs Inflow Area=.89 ac Inflow Outflow

C-ENG-C78CT-PAR CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=. in/hr Printed 7// HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Time span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs, points Runoff by Rational method, Rise/Fall=./. xtc Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment S: CT PAR- PRE Subcatchment S: CT PAR- Post Subcatchment S: CT PAR-a PRE Subcatchment S: CT PAR-a POST Reach R: PRE Reach 6R: POST Runoff Area=9.8 ac.8% Impervious Runoff Depth=.9" Flow Length=,7' Tc=9.6 min C=. Runoff=6.8 cfs.86 af Runoff Area=9.8 ac.8% Impervious Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=,7' Tc=9.6 min C=. Runoff=7.7 cfs. af Runoff Area=. ac.% Impervious Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=9' Tc=. min C=. Runoff=. cfs.9 af Runoff Area=. ac.% Impervious Runoff Depth=.8" Flow Length=9' Tc=. min C=.8 Runoff=. cfs.68 af Inflow=7.89 cfs.6 af Outflow=7.89 cfs.6 af Inflow=8.8 cfs.79 af Outflow=8.8 cfs.79 af Total Runoff Area =.788 ac Runoff Volume =.9 af Average Runoff Depth =." 99.6% Pervious =.66 ac.7% Impervious =.6 ac

C-ENG-C78CT-PAR CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=. in/hr Printed 7// HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Subcatchment S: CT PAR- PRE 7 6 6.8 cfs CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=. in/hr Runoff Area=9.8 ac Runoff Volume=.86 af Runoff Depth=.9" Flow Length=,7' Tc=9.6 min C=. Runoff

C-ENG-C78CT-PAR CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=. in/hr Printed 7// HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Subcatchment S: CT PAR- Post 8 7.7 cfs Runoff 7 6 CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=. in/hr Runoff Area=9.8 ac Runoff Volume=. af Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=,7' Tc=9.6 min C=.

C-ENG-C78CT-PAR CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=. in/hr Printed 7// HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Subcatchment S: CT PAR-a PRE. cfs Runoff CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=. in/hr Runoff Area=. ac Runoff Volume=.9 af Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=9' Tc=. min C=.

C-ENG-C78CT-PAR CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=. in/hr Printed 7// HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Subcatchment S: CT PAR-a POST. cfs Runoff CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=. in/hr Runoff Area=. ac Runoff Volume=.68 af Runoff Depth=.8" Flow Length=9' Tc=. min C=.8

C-ENG-C78CT-PAR CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=. in/hr Printed 7// HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Reach R: PRE 8 7 7.89 cfs Inflow Area=.89 ac Inflow Outflow 6

C-ENG-C78CT-PAR CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=. in/hr Printed 7// HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Reach 6R: POST 9 8 8.8 cfs Inflow Area=.89 ac Inflow Outflow 7 6

C-ENG-C78CT-PAR CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=.9 in/hr Printed 7// HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Time span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs, points Runoff by Rational method, Rise/Fall=./. xtc Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment S: CT PAR- PRE Subcatchment S: CT PAR- Post Subcatchment S: CT PAR-a PRE Subcatchment S: CT PAR-a POST Reach R: PRE Reach 6R: POST Runoff Area=9.8 ac.8% Impervious Runoff Depth=.8" Flow Length=,7' Tc=9.6 min C=. Runoff=.9 cfs.67 af Runoff Area=9.8 ac.8% Impervious Runoff Depth=.9" Flow Length=,7' Tc=9.6 min C=. Runoff=.67 cfs.76 af Runoff Area=. ac.% Impervious Runoff Depth=.88" Flow Length=9' Tc=. min C=. Runoff=.8 cfs. af Runoff Area=. ac.% Impervious Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=9' Tc=. min C=.8 Runoff=. cfs.9 af Inflow=.76 cfs.777 af Outflow=.76 cfs.777 af Inflow=.78 cfs.8 af Outflow=.78 cfs.8 af Total Runoff Area =.788 ac Runoff Volume =.6 af Average Runoff Depth =.89" 99.6% Pervious =.66 ac.7% Impervious =.6 ac

C-ENG-C78CT-PAR CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=.9 in/hr Printed 7// HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Subcatchment S: CT PAR- PRE 9 8 7 6.9 cfs CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=.9 in/hr Runoff Area=9.8 ac Runoff Volume=.67 af Runoff Depth=.8" Flow Length=,7' Tc=9.6 min C=. Runoff

C-ENG-C78CT-PAR CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=.9 in/hr Printed 7// HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Subcatchment S: CT PAR- Post 9 8 7 6.67 cfs CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=.9 in/hr Runoff Area=9.8 ac Runoff Volume=.76 af Runoff Depth=.9" Flow Length=,7' Tc=9.6 min C=. Runoff

C-ENG-C78CT-PAR CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=.9 in/hr Printed 7// HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Subcatchment S: CT PAR-a PRE.8 cfs Runoff CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=.9 in/hr Runoff Area=. ac Runoff Volume=. af Runoff Depth=.88" Flow Length=9' Tc=. min C=.

C-ENG-C78CT-PAR CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=.9 in/hr Printed 7// HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Subcatchment S: CT PAR-a POST. cfs Runoff CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=.9 in/hr Runoff Area=. ac Runoff Volume=.9 af Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=9' Tc=. min C=.8

C-ENG-C78CT-PAR CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=.9 in/hr Printed 7// HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Reach R: PRE.76 cfs Inflow Area=.89 ac Inflow Outflow 9 8 7 6

C-ENG-C78CT-PAR CT- -yr Duration= min, Inten=.9 in/hr Printed 7// HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Reach 6R: POST 6.78 cfs Inflow Area=.89 ac Inflow Outflow 9 8 7 6