Supplementary Planning Information

Similar documents
01 Application Number: APP/11/00184 Ward: Hayling East

ROYAL BOROUGH OF WINDSOR & MAIDENHEAD

Tennis Court Rear Of 3-5 Corringway London NW11 7ED

Ground Floor Flat 15 Redbourne Avenue London N3 2BP

Reference: 15/06961/RCU Received: 13th November 2015 Accepted: 17th November 2015 Ward: Coppetts Expiry 12th January 2016

REFERENCE: B/03745/12 Received: 02 October 2012 Accepted: 05 October 2012 WARD(S): Totteridge Expiry: 30 November 2012.

Brookside Walk Children's Play Area, London, NW4

Reserved Matters application for a site that straddles the boundary between CBC and BBC

Planning and Regulatory Committee 20 May Applicant Local Councillor Purpose of Report

REFERENCE: B/00601/12 Received: 11 February 2012 Accepted: 21 February 2012 WARD(S): High Barnet Expiry: 17 April 2012

49 Broughton Avenue London N3 3EN

Case Officer: Sarah Kay File No: CHE/14/00515/REM Tel. No: (01246) Plot No: 2/6132 Ctte Date: 15 th September 2014 ITEM 1

PART 1 EAST HAMPSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL SECTION 1 SCHEDULE OF APPLICATION RECOMMENDATIONS

Everton s Neighbourhood Plan. Site Allocation - Assessment Criteria

18 Birkbeck Road London NW7 4AA. Reference: 15/02994/HSE Received: 14th May 2015 Accepted: 26th May 2015 Ward: Mill Hill Expiry 21st July 2015

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Planning and New Communities Director

3 Tretawn Gardens London NW7 4NP

Reference: 16/1447/FUL Received: 7th March 2016 Accepted: 7th March 2016 Ward: East Finchley Expiry 2nd May 2016

Reference: 16/1234/HSE Received: 25th February 2016 Accepted: 2nd March 2016 Ward: High Barnet Expiry 27th April 2016

Garages To Rear Of The Willows 1025 High Road London N20 0QE

5 Gratton Terrace London NW2 6QE. Reference: 17/5094/HSE Received: 4th August 2017 Accepted: 7th August 2017 Ward: Childs Hill Expiry 2nd October 2017

3 Abbey View Mill Hill London NW7 4PB

Perth and Kinross Council Development Management Committee 24 April 2013 Report of Handling by Development Quality Manager

1 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans:

Useful Studio 1st Floor, The Clove Building 4 Maguire Street, Butler s Wharf London SE1 2NQ

6B Bertram Road London NW4 3PN

Final Revisions: Provision of single storey modular classroom and associated works.

COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION Parks and Recreation Department. Chair and Members of the Community and Corporate Services Committee

EAST OF ENGLAND OFFICE

PLANNING COMMITTEE. 14 October 2014

Applicant: Mr C Fletcher Agent: Ms B Stala Case Officer: Sally Smith (HBC) Jill Lee (WCC) Ward: Stakes Parish Southwick and Widley

1 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans:

PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT

Rev John Withy, Sion House, 120 Melmount Road, Sion Mills

CA//17/02777/FUL. Scale 1:1,250. Planning Services Canterbury City Council Military Road Canterbury Kent CT1 1YW

Derry City and Strabane District Council Planning Committee Report. Plinth restoration to include steam cleaning of ashlar walling and

Memorials, Plaques & Interpretive Signs Policy

Perth and Kinross Council Development Management Committee 20 February 2013 Report of Handling by Development Quality Manager

1 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans:

DONCASTER METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL. PLANNING COMMITTEE 3 rd May Expiry Date:

37 NAGS HEAD LANE BRENTWOOD ESSEX CM14 5NL

Burlington. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION Parks and Recreation Department. To be completed by the Clerks Department

App Type: Listed building consent Case officer: Andrew Collins. Address: Wareham Railway Station, Access Road to Railway, Northport, Wareham, BH20 4AS

Appropriate Assessment in relation to County Donegal Draft Heritage Plan

DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT

DONCASTER METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL. PLANNING COMMITTEE - 15th October Expiry Date:

An Introduction to Heritage

WOKING DESIGN SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT (SPD)

Proposal: Proposed new access road. The application site is Council owned land and the decision level is at Planning and Licensing Committee.

Derry City and Strabane District Council Planning Committee Report

Ward: West Wittering. Proposal Change of use from public highway pavement to residential garden use.

Ullswater Court 92 Holders Hill Road London NW4 1LN

PARISH / WARD: Peacehaven / Peacehaven East PROPOSAL:

Designations protecting the historic designed landscape

City of Kingston Heritage Commemoration Program Guidelines: 7 May 2010

Ebbsfleet Development Corporation

Report Author/Case Officer: Joanne Horner Contact Details:

Examination of South Cambridgeshire Local Plan

Reference: DC/18/00717 & DC/18/00718 Case Officer: Samantha Summers Ward: Sudbury South. Ward Member/s: Cllr Simon Barrett. Cllr Luke Cresswell.

Derry City and Strabane District Council Planning Committee Report. Environmental Improvement Scheme. Derry City & Strabane District Council

Planning, Taxi Licensing and Rights of Way Committee Report. Application No: P/2018/0725 Grid Ref:

Persimmon Homes Thames Valley Date received: 2 nd April week date(major): 2 nd July 2014 Ward: Nascot

Planning Committee 04/02/2015 Schedule Item 6. Smith Farm Estate, Old Bridge Close, Northolt, UB5 6UA.

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Executive Director (Operational Services) Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities)

APP/G1630/W/15/

Statement of Community Involvement LAND OFF SOUTHDOWN ROAD HORNDEAN, HAMPSHIRE

26 September 2014 CONSULTATION EXPIRY : APPLICATION EXPIRY : 22 July 2014 SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION: PERMISSION

Babergh and Mid Suffolk Joint Draft Local Plan Consultation, August 2017, Public Consultation

by Jennifer Tempest BA(Hons) MA PGDip PGCert Cert HE MRTPI IHBC an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

Canterbury City Council Military Road Canterbury Kent CT1 1YW. Title: CA/16/02745/ADV. Author: Planning and Regeneration.

2015/1020 Mr Edward Cockburn Caravan storage on hardcore base (Retrospective) Ranah Stones, Whams Road, Hazlehead, Sheffield, S36 4HT

Fixing the Foundations Statement

Mr & Mrs Connolly per Pump House Designs Pump House Yard The Green SEDLESCOMBE, East Sussex. TN33 0QA

TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT SECTION 79 AND TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (INQUIRIES PROCEDURE) (ENGLAND) RULES 2000 STATEMENT OF CASE OF

Description Details submitted pursuant to discharge of condition 5 (Design Code) attached to planning permission 13/01729/OUT.

St Michaels C of E Junior & Infant School, Nantmel Grove, Bartley Green, Birmingham, B32 3JS

Derry City and Strabane District Council Planning Committee Report

2014/0590 Reg Date 26/06/2014 Chobham

CA//16/00504/FUL. Canterbury City Council Military Road Canterbury Kent CT1 1YW. Crown copyright and database rights 2016 Ordnance Survey

UTT/17/2075/FUL - (BERDEN) (Referred to Committee by Councillor Janice Loughlin. Reason: In the Public Interest)

Heritage Action Zone. Explanatory Notes and Guidance

Derry City and Strabane District Council Planning Committee Report

Application Recommended for Approval Hapton with Park Ward

5 Eastlake Close, Petersfield, Hants, GU31 4ES SDNP/18/01399/TPO

UPPER GORDON ROAD TO CHURCH HILL, CAMBERLEY CONSERVATION AREA

08 MARCH 2016 PLANNING COMMITTEE. 6N 15/1330 Reg d: Expires: Ward: GE. of Weeks on Cttee Day:

Peter Brett Associates LLP (PBA) act on behalf of db symmetry ltd in respect of the proposed symmetry park, Kettering development (the Site).

Perth and Kinross Council Development Management Committee 8 June Pre-Application Report by Development Quality Manager

YMCA Erdington (Phase 2), 300 Reservoir Road, Erdington, Birmingham, B23 6DB

St Barnabas C of E Primary School, Spring Lane, Erdington, Birmingham, B24 9BY

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING ON MONDAY AUGUST 28, 2017 JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER

PLANNING STATEMENT. Market House Market Place Kingston upon Thames KT1 1JS

Test Valley Borough Council Southern Area Planning Committee 8 January 2019

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. REPORT TO: Planning Committee 1 April 2015 Planning and New Communities Director

What I am going to cover

MID SUFFOLK DISTRICT COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE A - 09 November (1) The application site is owned by Mid Suffolk District Council.

INTRODUCTION CURRENT APPLICATION

2014/0943 Reg Date 06/11/2014 Lightwater

DELEGATED REPORT. LOCATION Land At Hawley Common Minley Road Blackwater Camberley Surrey

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Planning and New Communities Director. Linton. Yes

Transcription:

Supplementary Planning Information HAVANT BOROUGH COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE 18 August 2016 I am now able to enclose, for consideration by the Development Management Committee on 18 August 2016, the following supplementary planning information that was unavailable when the agenda was printed. Agenda No Item 8(1) APP/16/00707 - War Memorial, St Faiths Church, West Street, Havant, PO9 1EH Proposal: Variation of Condition 2 of Listed Building Consent APP/15/011356 for the retention of font type Copperplate Gothic Bold in respect of existing and future commemorations. 1-12 Supporting Documents: http://tinyurl.com/gm3g8zw and http://tinyurl.com/hfesuxt

Site Address: War Memorial, St Faiths Church, West Street, Havant, PO9 1EH Proposal: Variation of Condition 2 of Listed Building Consent APP/15/01356 for the retention of font type 'Copperplate Gothic Bold' in respect of existing and future commemorations. Application No: APP/16/00707 Expiry Date: 02/09/2016 Applicant: Mrs D Pink Havant Borough Council Agent: N/A Case Officer: Rachael McMurray Ward: St Faiths Reason for Committee Consideration: Havant Borough Council application HPS Recommendation: GRANT PERMISSION 1 Site Description 1.1 The application site is located at St Faiths Church in Havant Town Centre and within the St Faiths Conservation Area and comprises a monument which serves as a war memorial. The monument is positioned at the junction of North, South, West and East Streets in front of St Faiths Church. 1.2 The monument is a Grade II listed structure made from stone with flint brick work detailing. It was erected in 1922 to commemorate the fallen of WWI and originally comprised 8no. bronze panels. Further panels were added to the monument after WWII. 1.3 Following a recent listed building consent (see Section 2 for full details) two further plaques have been erected on the War Memorial. One of these replaced an existing plaque. 2 Planning History APP/15/01241 Listed Building Consent for additional plaque for War Memorial and change fixings to some of existing plaques. Approved on 20/1/16 APP/15/01356 Listed Building Consent for 2no. additional plaques (one to replace existing). Approved on 20/1/16 3 Proposal 3.1 Following the grant of Listed Building Consent APP/15/01356, two plaques have recently been installed on the War Memorial. Condition 2 of Planning Permission APP/15/01356 stated: 'The font size and style to be used on the plaques shall match that used on other World War II commemorative plaques on the War Memorial. Reason: In the interests of the architectural and historic interest of the listed building and having due regard to Policy CS16 of the Havant Borough Local Plan (Core Strategy)

2011, Policy DM20 of the Havant Borough Local Plan (Allocations) 2014 and the National Planning Policy Framework 2012'. 3.2 However, the font used on the new plaques is 'Copperplate Gothic Bold' which does not match in style that on the existing WWII plaques. This application therefore seeks to regularise the situation by seeking consent for the variation of Condition 2 of Listed Building Consent APP/15/01356 to enable the retention of font type 'Copperplate Gothic Bold' in respect of existing and future commemorations. 4 Policy Considerations National Planning Policy Framework 2012 Havant Borough Local Plan (Core Strategy) March 2011 CS11 (Protecting and Enhancing the Special Environment and Heritage of Havant Borough) Havant Borough Local Plan (Allocations) July 2014 DM20 (Historic Assets) Listed Building Grade: Grade II Conservation Area: St Faiths 5 Statutory and Non Statutory Consultations Conservation Officer: This proposal is for a variation of condition 2 of Listed Building Consent APP/16/00707. Following my site visit the following inconsistencies exist between the WWII plaques and recently added Post WWII plaques: The typeface is not the same The colour (patina) of the plaques is brown as opposed to black, although this may weather slightly over time The size of the lettering for the regiment and rank of each individual commemorated is not in the same proportion to the name as per the WWII plaques There are no commas after the names as per the WWI and WWII plaques Whilst there are clear inconsistencies between the new plaques and WWII plaques it should also be noted that there are clear inconsistencies between the WWI and WWII plaques. It could therefore be argued that precedence for adding new plaques in an authentic manner has been established. The historic significance of the War Memorial lies largely in its appearance and design. I do not believe the proposals as submitted greatly detract from this significance as this appears to have been previously compromised with the addition of the WWII plaques. The position of the proposed plaques on the flanks of the war memorial has also helped to reduce any harm that might have been considered.

Whilst it would have been preferable to have faithful reproduction of the WWII plaques the proposals continue the evolution/change that has previously occurred on the war memorial. As the War Memorial Trust state there is an acceptable rationale behind adding additional plaques in an authentic style. As such I have no objection to the variation of condition 2. Historic England: No objections War Memorials Trust: Having looked at the plaques, there are the following inconsistencies between the WWII and Post-WWII plaques: The typeface is not the same The colour (patina) of the plaques is brown as opposed to black, although this may weather slightly over time The size of the lettering for the regiment and rank of each individual commemorated is not in the same proportion to the name as per the WWII plaques There are no commas after the names as per the WWI and WWII plaques Replication issues One of the issues which has arisen as part of the project to replicate the original WWII plaques is the difficulty of producing a similar design. Following discussions with the Estates Team, WMT is aware that considerable effort has been made to find a way to match the original plaques as close as possible. The majority of bronze plaques are now produced using standard typefaces with a computer, which would have been done by hand when the WWII plaques were originally added to the war memorial. This would very much have depended on the skill of the original engraver and could potentially be difficult to replicate. WMT has been involved in a number of cases previously where an original typeface has been reproduced. However, in these instances the plaques were cast bronze plaques with raised lettering as opposed engraved plaques. As a result, it may be difficult to reproduce the original typeface. Historic addition of plaques WMT s advice regarding adding names to war memorials is based on the principle that names from subsequent conflict have been added in the same style as the First World War names. This is the case at Fareham war memorial where names were inscribed on inset stone panels in the same typeface. However, at Havant the WWII names were engraved onto bronze plaques as opposed to the original cast plaques. As a result, Havant war memorial has a history of authentic addition of names for subsequent conflicts. If the plaques which are being considered as part of this Listed Building Consent application were for further WWII names WMT would advise these must in the same style. WMT feel that this history of authentic addition of names should be taken into account in response to the request to vary condition 2. The addition of dissimilar WWII plaques following the end of the war provides a precedent for adding plaques in an authentic manner which avoids adversely affecting the architectural significance of the war memorial. It should be noted that if these WWII plaques were cast in bronze as opposed to engraved, WMT would insist these should be in the same style.

Decision Based on the above comments, WMT do not wish to raise any objections to the variation of condition 2 of Listed Building Consent application APP/16/007/07. Although we do not think the current situation is ideal there is an acceptable rationale behind adding additional plaques in an authentic style. 6 Community Involvement This application was publicised in accordance with the Council's Code of Practice for Publicity of Planning Applications approved at minute 207/6/92 (as amended), as a result of which the following publicity was undertaken: Number of neighbour notification letters sent: 9 Number of site notices: 1 Statutory advertisement: 22/07/2016 Number of representations received: 0 7 Planning Considerations 7.1 When making a decision on a listed building consent application, a local planning authority must have special regard to the desirability of preserving the building or its setting or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses. Preservation in this context means not harming the interest in the building, as opposed to keeping it utterly unchanged. This obligation, found in sections 16 and 66 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, applies to all decisions concerning listed buildings. 7.2 Having regard to this legislative background, and relevant policies of the development plan, it is considered that the main issue arising from this application is: (i) Effect on the listed monument s preservation and its features of architectural or historic interest 7.3 Policy DM20 (Historic Assets) advises that planning permission will be granted for development that conserves and enhances the historic assets of Havant Borough. Protecting and enhancing the historic environment is also one of the core principles of the NPPF. Both the Council's Conservation Officer and the War Memorials Trust have identified inconsistencies between the WWII plaques and the post WWII plaques, one of these being that the typeface is not the same which was a requirement of Condition 2 of Planning Permission APP/15/01356. However, both consultees point out that there are inconsistencies between the WWI and WWII plaques and therefore it could be argued that precedence for adding new plaques in an authentic manner has been established. 7.4 The historic significance of the War Memorial lies largely in its appearance and design and it considered that the font used on the new plaques does not in itself greatly detract from this significance as this appears to have been previously compromised with the addition of the WWII plaques. Whilst it would have been preferable to have faithful reproduction of the WWII plaques, the consultees are of the view that the proposals continue the evolution/change that has previously occurred on the war memorial. As the War Memorial Trust state there is an acceptable rationale behind adding additional plaques (with the Copperplate font) in an authentic style.

7.5 It is therefore considered that the proposal to retain the existing typeface on the plaques will still preserve the special architectural and historic interest of the monument and accords with Policies CS11 and DM20 of the Local Plan and Section 12 of the NPPF. and as such is recommended for approval. 8 Conclusion 8.1 Having had special regard to the desirability of preserving the war memorial and its features of special architectural or historic interest, the proposal to retain the existing typeface on the plaques is considered to be acceptable for the reasons discussed above and is therefore recommended for listed building consent. 9 RECOMMENDATION: That the Head of Planning be authorised to GRANT PERMISSION for application APP/16/00707 subject to the following condition: 1. The font size to be used on the plaques shall match that used on other World War II commemorative plaques on the War Memorial; the font style shall be 'Copperplate Gothic Bold'. Reason: In the interests of the architectural and historic interest of the listed building and having due regard to Policy CS11 of the Havant Borough Local Plan (Core Strategy) 2011, Policy DM20 of the Havant Borough Local Plan (Allocations) 2014 and the National Planning Policy Framework 2012. Appendices: Appendix A Site Plan Appendix B1 Memorial front elevation Appendix B2 Memorial front elevation Appendix C1 Photograph of plaque on War Memorial Appendix C2 Photograph of plaque on War Memorial

MEMORIAL FRONT ELEVATION APPENDIX B

MEMORIAL FRONT ELEVATION

APPENDIX C PHOTO IMAGES OF EXISTING PLAQUES

PHOTO IMAGES OF EXISTING PLAQUES