REQUIRED CHECKLIST FOR Better Streets Plan Section 138.1(c)(2)

Similar documents
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN)

City of Reedley Community Development Department 1733 Ninth Street Reedley, CA (559) FAX

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY (NOA) OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 2190 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project

Bayshore Boulevard Home Improvement District Design Guidelines

Application for Site Plan Review

CONSENT CALENDAR September 27, 2005

City of Burlington Downtown Street Design & Construction Standards

Chapter PEDESTRIAN COMMERCIAL (PC) ZONING DISTRICT

Mary Hills Nature Area. Roadway Lighting. The Minneapolis Clinic of Neurology Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute

4.500 Preston Road Overlay District

CITY CLERK. Consolidated Clause in North York Community Council Report 8, which was considered by City Council on October 26, 27 and 28, 2004.

CITY OF ZEELAND PLANNING COMMISSION

TOP TEN LIST OF COMMUNITY CONCERNS REGARDING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 42

BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MERCER ISLAND, WA

Design Review Application *Please call prior to submittal meeting to determine applicable fees*

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

4780 Eglinton Avenue West - Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

The following two (2) checklists verify what information is being provided and required.

EUREKA VALLEY / HARVEY MILK MEMORIAL BRANCH LIBRARY COMMUNITY MEETING 3 WEDNESDAY, APRIL 5, 2017

PARKLET PROPOSAL PACKAGE & PROCESS

D ESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE

Commissioners Road West Realignment Environmental Assessment

Planning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008

7437, 7439 and 7441 Kingston Road - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications - Preliminary Report

I Street, Sacramento, CA

CENTERS AND CORRIDORS

KASPER. City of Georgetown, Texas PUD Planned Unit Development. December 30, 2015 Revised January 27, 2016

1173 W. University Dr. Request to construct a new Alumni Center.

5.1.1 The streetscape along US Highway 64 (Brevard Road); and, The built environment within new residential developments; and,

Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool

Executive Summary General Plan Amendment Initiation

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM

Construction and Landscaping on Public Property

COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION

STAFF REPORT FOR STANDARD COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT #CDP FEBRUARY 26, 2015 CPA - 1 PO BOX 238 APTOS, CA 94001

COMPLETE GREEN STREET CHECKLIST

The subject site plan amendment proposes the following revisions to the approved site plan:

Bloor St. W. Rezoning - Preliminary Report

Yonge-Summerhill: Urban Square Design (Midtown)

CRESCENT RESOURCES INC.

Design Guidelines and Standards for Sight Triangles. Sight Triangle MANUAL

open house 3 CITY OF SALEM Downtown Streetscape Plan

Note: Staff reports can be accessed at Special Permit Application No.

REZONING APPLICATION MPD SUPPLEMENT

Net Land Area (NLA): Area within zoning lot boundaries NLA= sq. ft. a) Credited Street Area (total adjacent frontage) x ½ width of public rightof-way

APPLICATION FORM SITE PLAN REVIEW REGULATIONS TOWN OF CONWAY, NH

TENNESSEE STATE ROUTE 109 CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT ALONG STATE ROUTE 109

2900 Steeles Avenue East at Don Mills Road in the Town of Markham

CITY OF SANTA ROSA PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 23, 2016 APPLICANT. Joseph Rubin MJP15-005

Carson Street Streetscape Improvements. Request for Proposals

VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion

Technical Advisory Committee

R STREET CORRIDOR NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Supplemental Guidelines Checklist

Toronto and East York Community Council

S000 SITE REVIEW APPR NO. FIRE CODE COMPLIANCE ITEM

Access Aisle (Van) (Flow Test) Water Mains (Location & Sizes) Building Entrances. Building, Facilities, Element. Curb Ramps (Built-up)

DENVER DESIGN DISTRICT GDP

Sec Development design approval and procedures.

Title 11 Streets and Sidewalks

St. Clair Avenue West Area Transportation Master Plan

EXHIBIT B PROJECT NARRATIVE POULSBO MEADOWS

MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

STAFF REPORT TO COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist

5959 Yonge Street Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report

ARTICLE 13 STREETS General

Chapter 1 - General Design Guidelines CHAPTER 1 GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES

Seneca Meadows. Block 4 Locate office, technology, and medical development adjacent to I Screen views of garage structures from I-270.

M E M O R A N D U M. Chair and Members of North West Planning Advisory Committee

CITY OF CYPRESS 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California (714) DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PERMIT PROCESS

Department of Community Development Engineering Office NJDOT Municipal Aid Program - Cottrell Road Pedestrian Safety

ARTICLE 13 STREETS General

SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO

This page left intentionally blank.

Planning Commission Draft Motion No HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 2010

ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE ZONED UNINCORPORATED AREAS ARTICLE 1150 OF PUTNAM COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA Page 95 ARTICLE 1150 SITE PLAN REVIEW

APPENDIX G: TOWN ORDINANCE REVIEW

WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Zoning OBJECTIVE: in the zoning. is to make. projects for. the Planning and. are attached ITTALS: Department

ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 404 MASTER PLANNING

Adoption of the Rosslyn Sector Plan Site Plan Review Committee (SPRC) Meeting October 26, 2015

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

Community Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU)

3. Additional driveways may be permitted where determined by the Planning Commission to adequately accommodate traffic or ensure public safety.

The transportation system in a community is an

2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

TOWNSHIP OF LOGAN SOIL & FILL IMPORTATION AND PLACEMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

2016 REVISIONS COMMENT FORM RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE PUBLIC WAY COMMENT PERIOD: JUNE 1 TO JUNE 30, 2015

3.1 Survey Monument Preservation Guidelines for New and Reconstruction Projects. B. After construction and prior to recording Notice of Completion:

Corporate Report. Further, that Legal Services be directed to prepare the necessary amendments to the City s Delegation By-law.

Section 9 NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN

TENTATIVE MAP CHECKLIST

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

2 Project Description

Transcription:

REQUIRED CHECKLIST FOR Better Streets Plan Section 138.1(c)(2) Planning Department 1650 Mission Street Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103-9425 Pursuant to Planning Code Section 138.1 and Administrative Code Section 98.1, many large construction projects trigger requirements for a Streetscape Plan. Planning Department staff are available to advise you in the preparation of this checklist. Call (415) 558-6377 for further information. T: 415.558.6378 F: 415.558.6409 WHAT DOES THIS CHECKLIST DO? This checklist describes applicable streetscape plan related requirements and will help you design a Code-compliant project. Completion of this checklist is a requirement for projects meeting the criteria identified below. No permit will be approved by the Planning Department before satisfying all applicable streetscape plan requirements, including receiving clearance from the Department s Streetscape Design Advisory Team (SDAT). WHY IS A STREETSCAPE PLAN REQUIRED? Streets make up 25% of San Francisco land area. In 2010, the City adopted the San Francisco Better Streets Plan, a unified set of standards, guidelines, and implementation strategies to govern how the City designs, builds, and maintains its pedestrian environment. The Better Streets Plan provides a blueprint for building streets that continue to function as corridors of movement while at the same time are improved to reach their potential for enhanced community life, recreational opportunities, and ecological benefits. Developers often propose or are required to improve the streets adjacent to their development. This creates a unique opportunity to completely re-make the street environment. Projects that meet the criteria below are required to make improvements consistent with the Better Streets Plan (http://www. sfbetterstreets.org). WHEN IS A STREETSCAPE PLAN REQUIRED? If the project meets any one of the criteria from Category 1, and any one of the criteria from Category 2, then Section 138.1(c)(2) applies. CATEGORY 1: PROJECT LOCATION CATEGORY 2: PROJECT SCOPE Is greater than ½-acre in total area; or New construction; or Contains 250 feet of total lot frontage on one or more publicly-accessible rights-of-way; or Addition of 20% or more of gross floor area to an existing building; or The frontage encompasses the entire block face between the nearest two intersections with any other publicly-accessible rights-of-way. Alteration to greater than 50% of the existing square footage of a building www.sfplanning.org INSTRUCTIONS An applicant for a project which meets the criteria identified above must complete this checklist and submit a copy of it to the Planning Department along with the building permit or other application(s) required for the project. Not all projects meeting the criteria above will be subject to making streetscape improvements. For example, if the street abutting the project already includes all of the streetscape improvements identified in the Better Streets Plan, SDAT may determine that no additional improvements are necessary.

FOR MORE INFORMATION: Call or visit the San Francisco Planning Department Central Reception 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103-2479 TEL: 415.558.6378 FAX: 415.558.6409 WEB: http://www.sfplanning.org Planning Information Center (PIC) 1660 Mission Street, First Floor San Francisco, CA 94103-2479 TEL: 415.558.6377 Planning staff are available by phone and at the PIC counter. No appointment is necessary.

Required Checklist for Streetscape Plan BUILDING PERMIT OR CASE NUMBER: For Staff Use only REQUIRED CHECKLIST FOR Section 138.1(c)(2) Better Streets Plan 1. Applicant Information CONTACT FOR PROJECT INFORMATION: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: ( ) EMAIL: 2. Location and Classification of Property STREET ADDRESS OF PROJECT: CROSS STREETS: ASSESSORS BLOCK/LOT: LENGTH OF ALL LOT FRONTAGE(S): LOT SIZE: ZONING DISTRICT: / RELATED BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION AND/OR CASE NO.: 3. Scope of Project Requirements for a streetscape plan apply to the types of projects identified in the table below. Please check all boxes that apply to your project. If one or more boxes are checked in both Category 1 and Category 2, then a streetscape plan is required and you need to complete this form. CATEGORY 1: PROJECT LOCATION I. Is greater than ½-acre in total area; or CATEGORY 2: PROJECT SCOPE I. New construction; or II. Contains 250 feet of total lot frontage on one or more publicly-accessible rights-of-way; or II. Addition of 20% or more of gross floor area to an existing building; or III. The frontage encompasses the entire block face between the nearest two intersections with any other publicly-accessible rights-of-way. III. Alteration to greater than 50% of the existing square footage of a building 3

Required Checklist for Streetscape Plan 4. Streetscape Information For all project street frontages, what is the street type? FRONTAGE STREET NAME CROSS STREETS SEGMENT LENGTH STREET TYPE Frontage 1 Frontage 2 Frontage 3 Frontage 4 For map of street types, see http://www.sfbetterstreets.org/design-guidelines/street-types/ For each project street frontage, does the proposed sidewalk meet the Recommended Width for the street type? FRONTAGE EXISTING WIDTH (IN FEET) PROPOSED WIDTH (IN FEET) MEETS RECOMMENDED WIDTH? Frontage 1 % YES % NO Frontage 2 % YES % NO Frontage 3 % YES % NO Frontage 4 % YES % NO For recommended sidewalk width by street type, see http://www.sfbetterstreets.org/design-guidelines/sidewalk-width/ Does the proposed streetscape design include all standard streetscape improvements for the appropriate street type? ELEMENT INCLUDED IN PROPOSAL? Curb ramps % YES % NO % N/A Corner curb extensions % YES % NO % N/A Street trees % YES % NO % N/A Sidewalk plantings % YES % NO % N/A Pedestrian lighting % YES % NO % N/A Special sidewalk paving (furnishing zone) % YES % NO % N/A EXPLAIN Site furnishings (benches, bike racks, etc.) % YES % NO % N/A EXPLAIN Other % YES % NO % N/A See http://www.sfbetterstreets.org/design-guidelines/streetscape-elements-by-street-type/ All improvements in the public right-of-way are subject to all applicable City permits and approvals. 4 SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT V.01.09.2014

Required Checklist for Streetscape Plan 5. Streetscape Plan If the project triggers Section 138.1(c)(2) of the Planning Code, please attach a Streetscape Plan showing the location, design, and dimensions of all existing and proposed streetscape elements in the public right-of-way for all property frontages, and the relation of such elements to proposed new construction and site work on the subject property. Streetscape Plan Checklist PROPOSED STREETSCAPE ELEMENTS SHOWN IN STREETSCAPE PLAN Property line % YES % NO Proposed building edge and any features overhanging the right-of-way (e.g. bay windows) % YES % NO Curb lines (existing and proposed) % YES % NO Roadway dimensions, including lane dimensions if available % YES % NO Street trees % YES % NO Sidewalk landscaping % YES % NO Street and pedestrian lighting % YES % NO Site furnishings % YES % NO Paving materials % YES % NO Utilities % YES % NO Driveways % YES % NO 5

Planning Department Determination TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF ONLY. DO NOT LEAVE ANY SECTION BLANK BUILDING PERMIT / CASE NO PLANS DATED Does the project trigger Section 138.1(c)(2) Better Streets requirements? Category 1: Project Location Is the project located on a lot that: I. Is greater than ½-acre in total area; or II. Contains 250 feet of total lot frontage on one or more publicly-accessible rights-ofway; or III. The frontage encompasses the entire block face between the nearest two intersections with any other publicly-accessible rights-of-way. Category 2: Project Scope Does the project include: I. New construction; or II. Addition of 20% or more of gross floor area to an existing building; or III. Alteration to greater than 50% of the existing square footage of a building. If the project meets any one of the criteria from Category 1 and any one of the criteria from Category 2, then Section 138.1(c)(2) applies, and the applicant must submit a Streetscape Plan. The Streetscape Plan will be reviewed by the Streetscape Design Review Team (SDAT). The project planner is responsible for scheduling a SDAT meeting, and should bring the Streetscape Plan and this filled-out form to the meeting. At the meeting, there will be an opportunity to review the project against other street designations that may be applicable, including high injury corridors. STAFF TO SIGN. Signature: Print Name: Date: SDAT Meeting Date : Once the SDAT meeting has taken place, the Planner should attach the SDAT meeting notes to this form. Staff Checklist The applicant has completed this entire checklist. Once signed, a copy of this checklist has been returned to the applicant. The original has been included in the project file. The Streetscape Plan and SDAT notes should be included in the project file. 6 SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT V.05.07.2012